HomeMy WebLinkAboutALPINE BANK - FDP210009 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
6162 S. Willow Drive, Suite 320
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
303.770.8884 • GallowayUS.com
July 8th, 2021
Todd Sullivan, Development Review Coordinator
City of Fort Collins, Community Development and Neighborhood Services
281 N. College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
Fort Collins, CO
Dear Todd,
Thank you for the written comments from our second round Final Development Plan (FDP) for the
referenced location. Please find below our responses to comments received June 18, 2021. Please
note that the written comments received were actually dated June 30, 2021 which we believe was an
error. Responses and revised plans are based on these written comments as well as our meeting
Wednesday, Jube 16, 2021. Please note that the written comments received were actually dated June
30, 2021 which we believe was an error. To better facilitate your review, we have included the original
comments in italicized font, and have provided our responses in bold.
Comment Summary:
Department: Development Review Coordinator
Contact: Todd Sullivan, 970-221-6695, tsullivan@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/21/2021
Response: None required.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/15/2021
06/15/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: For the recording documents submittal,
please revise the owner certification block to match the content in the
attached example exactly, and also, include the city signature block.
Response: The owner certifications block has been updated to match the
provided example. Thank you.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/15/2021
06/15/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: The resolution of the Parks department
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 2 of 10
comment is unclear and this would need to be resolved prior to mylar. Please
coordinate this comment with Parks staff.
Response: See response below. Thank you.
Department: Parks
Contact: Aaron Wagner, , aawagner@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
04/26/2021: FOR FINAL
The Parks Dept. has concerns regarding the streetscaping along Prospect Rd.
We understand that Alpine Bank has stated that they will be handling all
landscaping and ongoing maintenance for the ROW as part of their property
upkeep. Thank you for providing that clarification and including the note on
sheet C0.1 -- note 12. This location is unique for the Parks Dept. and we would
like to see some uniformity in the flower design to match the rest of the
intersection’s annual flowerpots that Parks designs and maintains. To ensure
that the ROW landscaping is addressed for potential future owners and is
somewhat uniform in design and upkeep; please update the note and include it
on the Site and Landscape Plans stating:
"The design and installation of all Parkway/tree lawn and median areas in the
Right-of-way shall be in accordance with the City Standards. Unless otherwise
agreed to by the city with the Final Plans, all ongoing maintenance of such
areas is the responsibility of the owner/developer. Annual/perennial plantings
in the planter pots along Prospect Rd. shall be kept well maintained and thriving
in a manner that is consistent with the city owned and maintained plantings of
the intersection. The owner/developer shall maintain these landscape features
in perpetuity in order to keep the intersection features presentable."
Moving forward, the Parks Dept. will more than likely approach the
owner/developer of the site and present a flower design in late Fall of each year
for Alpine Bank to consider matching in the following summer. We look forward
to working with Alpine Bank on these features and appreciate your partnership.
Response: The ROW landscaping note has been added to the plans as
directed. Thank you.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 3 of 10
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Spencer Smith, 970-221-6603, smsmith@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/27/2021
06/15/2021: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA)
I have all DA language from other City staff and am working to complete the
draft of the agreement.
04/27/2021: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA)
Thank you for the Development Agreement information form submittal. I will be
working with City staff to get a draft DA prepared after our review of your 2nd
FDP submittal. That draft will go to our City Attorney for review and a revised
(if necessary) draft will be provided to your team at that time to review.
Response: Noted. Please continue to expedite as we understand this is
critical path to begin pulling permits. Thank you.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/27/2021
06/15/2021: DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (DCP)
Thank you for submitting the cost estimate. If there are no City comments that
will impact site design/layout after this second submittal review, I will forward
the plans and cost estimate to our Chief Engineering Inspector for review.
04/27/2021: DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (DCP)
A DCP will be required for this project. Please refer to the City Engineering
Development Review website for more information:
https://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php. The City will need a DCP
application and fee to be submitted prior to scheduling your DCP meeting. We
will also need an engineer's opinion of cost to be submitted for review by our
Engineering Inspections staff. This cost estimate will provide the basis for the
inspection fees and Engineering public infrastructure surety that will need to be
provided prior to issuance of the DCP. Please use the cost estimate template
(recently updated) available on the Engineering Development Review website
listed above.
Response: Please provide comments on the cost estimate at your earliest
convenience. We have included a copy of what was provided with the 2nd
FDP submittal for reference but have not made any changes. We will
coordinate with GC on DCP. Thank you.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 4 of 10
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/27/2021
06/15/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
I realized that the Engineering redlines mentioned throughout the previous
submittal comments were not provided. I emailed those redlines to Mike Shaw
on 6/14. Please work with me on a follow-up submittal directly to me, to review
my previous redlines.
04/27/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Please see site plan redlines (sheets 1-3) for site plan comments.
Response: Thank you for sending these. Redline responses have been
created and sent to Spencer Smith on June 23rd for an expedited review.
We received a few additional comments via email on June 30th and send
back redlines responses and revised drawings on July 1st. Should there
be any remaining discrepancy, please reach out to us privately to
coordinate on last minute comments.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/27/2021
06/15/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
I realized that the Engineering redlines mentioned throughout the previous
submittal comments were not provided. I emailed those redlines to Mike Shaw
on 6/14. Please work with me on a follow-up submittal directly to me, to review
my previous redlines.
Response: Redlines received via email on 6/14 addressed and
coordinated via email to confirm. See above response for additional
detail. Thank you!
04/27/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
The rest of my comments can be found in my redlines. Please thoroughly
review the entire redline set and address all comments. It will be helpful if you
continue to provide specific responses to each comment that indicate how the
comment/redline was addressed. Since the majority of the comments are in
the redlined pdf, a pdf submittal that includes responses to the redlines directly
on
the pdf sheets would probably be the most useful. Please include something to
the effect of "Redline Responses" in the file name.
Response: Thank you for sending these. Redline responses have been
created and sent to Spencer Smith on June 23rd for an expedited review.
We received a few additional comments via email on June 30th and send
back redlines responses and revised drawings on July 1st. Should there
be any remaining discrepancy, please reach out to us privately to
coordinate on last minute comments.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 5 of 10
Department: Stormwater Engineering – Erosion and Sediment Control
Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-222-1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14/2021
06/14/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL [UPDATED]: Please see/address
updated redlines to the utility plans.
INFORMATION ONLY:
Stormwater and Erosion Control inspection fees and Erosion Control escrow
are due prior to DCP issuance.
Response: Acknowledged. Erosion Control Escrow Cost Estimate has
been included again with this submittal for determining these estimated
fees for the DCP. Please reach out to us directly to coordinate any
discrepancies that may need to be addressed.
04/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please address all comments provided on the redlined Erosion and Sediment
Control Plans.
Response: All Erosion & Sediment Control plan redlines have been
addressed. A concrete washout has been designated away from the
existing/proposed inlets as requested. And, inlet protection is now shown
for the existing inlet on College Avenue.
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
06/15/2021: FOR APPROVAL UPDATED:
A relocation of this sewer service line may be needed with the expansion of the
Stormtech system reducing the separation distances.
Response: The sanitary sewer line connecting to the relocated historic
building has been shifted to avoid conflict with the new StormTech
system.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 6 of 10
04/26/2021: FOR APPROVAL:
The sanitary sewer service for the historical building is still not centered
between the StormTech chambers and the trash enclosure. It looks loke 10
is the total space provided and placing the service at 5 feet separation should
work.
Response: The sanitary sewer line connecting to the relocated historic
building has been shifted to avoid conflict with the new StormTech
system.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
06/15/2021: FOR APPROVAL:
Please show the water line all the way to the building to ensure 6 -foot
separation
Response: The line has been extended all the way to the building to
confirm the 6-foot separation is provided between the line and the
adjacent tree.
from the tree.
04/26/2021: FOR APPROVAL:
For the existing water service being proposed for reuse to serve the relocated
historical building, the proposed tree is too close to the existing water meter.
This meter pit needs to be relocated to the south so the service after the meter
has the proper 6 feet spacing.
Response: The copper water service line has been routed around the tree
to avoid conflict. Thank you.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
06/15/2021: REPEAT COMMENT
04/26/2021: FOR APPROVAL:
Please remove the pipe fittings for the 1-inch water service on the Utility Plan
as well.
Response: Pipe fittings have been removed on the plans for the 1-inch
water service to the main building.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 7 of 10
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
06/15/2021: The value in the equation is incorrect. It appears that
NGVD29(Adjusted) Datum is being used. The City's old Datum was NGVD29
Unadjusted. Please correct the value.
04/26/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the
EXACT format shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL
DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29
UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR
THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS
DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION
SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF
FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 DATUM - X.XX’.
Response: The benchmark has been updated to show the appropriate
NGVD29 adjustment value. Thank you.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
06/15/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL-UPDATED:
The Subdivision Plat name should be included as the leading line in the legal
description.
04/26/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please revise the legal description to match the legal description on the
Subdivision Plat.
Response: The legal description has been updated to include the
Subdivision Plat name.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 8 of 10
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
06/15/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL-UPDATED:
The Subdivision Plat name should be included as the leading line in the legal
description.
04/26/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please revise the legal description to match the legal description on the
Subdivision Plat.
Response: The legal description has been updated to include the
Subdivision Plat name.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
06/15/2021: The value in the equation is incorrect. It appears that
NGVD29(Adjusted)
Datum is being used. The City's old Datum was NGVD29 Unadjusted. Please
correct the value.
04/26/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the
EXACT format shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL
DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29
UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR
THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS
DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION
SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF
FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 DATUM - X.XX’.
Response: The benchmark has been updated to show the appropriate
NGVD29 adjustment value. Thank you.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 9 of 10
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
04/26/2021: Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended.
Current adopted codes are:
2018 International Building Code (IBC) with local amendments
2018 International Existing Building Code (IEBC) with local amendments
2018 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with local amendments
2018 International Mechanical Code (IMC) with local amendments
2018 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) with local amendments
2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPSC) with local
amendments
2018 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2020 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Copies of current City of Fort Collins code amendments can be found at
fcgov.com/building.
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Loads: Risk Category II (most structures):
· 140mph (Ultimate) exposure B or
Front Range Gust Map published by The Structural Engineer's Association
of Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code: 2018 IECC commercial chapter.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
· Commercial occupancies must provide 10ft setback from property line and 20
feet
between other buildings or provide fire rated walls and openings per
chapter 6 and 7
of the IBC.
· City of Fort Collins amendments to the 2018 IBC require a full NFPA-13
sprinkler system per IBC chapter 9 or when building exceeds 5000 sq.ft. (or
meet fire containment requirements).
· Prescriptive energy compliance with increased insulation values is required for
buildings using electric heat.
A City licensed commercial general contractor is required to construct any new
commercial structure.
Response: Noted. Thank you.
Alpine Bank Redevelopment
SEC of S. College Avenue & E. Prospect Road
July 8th, 2021
Galloway & Company, Inc. Page 10 of 10
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/26/2021
04/26/2021: The relocation of the single-family house must be at least 5ft from
the property lines to avoid additional code requirements.
Response: Noted, this requirement has been met to avoid additional
code requirements. Thank you.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: *Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/28/2021
04/28/2021: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit.
The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the
Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson*.
Response: Noted. Irrigation Plans have been completed and were
forwarded to Eric Olson via email on 7/6/2021 prior to this response
submittal. Thank you.
Thank you again for comments received as well as follow-up discussions and coordination efforts.
Please review our revised plans and let us know if you have any question or require additional
information.
Sincerely,
GALLOWAY
Zell O. Cantrell
Senior Site Development Project Manager
ZellCantrell@GallowayUS.com