HomeMy WebLinkAboutLAURIE SUBDIVISION PUD - PRELIMINARY - 44-89D - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - APPLICATIONPLANNING DEPARTMEN
APPLICATION FORE
CIQ f (Put&n/ 44eeeq A L�L - agal
City of Fort Collins
Project Name: Laurie Subdivision P.U.D. Land Use Information:
Project Number:
Project Location or Street Address:
Shields Street
Today's Date: May 31, 1991
co
m
m GENERAL INFORMATION:
*Owners Name: Dr. Bill Muss 1 ewh i to
o Address: 3041 N. Taft Ave, Loveland,
z 663-0220
x Telephone:
Q
m
Approximately 4951 South
Gross Acreage/Sq. Footage
Existing Zoning: RLP
6.46 ac. / 281,651 s.f.
Proposed Use: _Si ng 1 e Fami 1 y 1 ots _
Total Number of Dwelling Units: 9
Total Commercial Floor Area: -0-
Applicants Name: same as owner
Address:
Telephone:
TYPE OF REQUEST:
Contact Person: same as owner
Address:
Telephone:
Please indicate type of application submitted by checking the box preceding appropriate request(s). Combined requests, except for Final
PUD and Final Subdivision, require the combined individual fees. No application will be processed until all required information is provided.
Additional handouts are available explaining information requirements for each of the following review prooesses.
�nriexalionAvitti• I nitiaGZor�ng ` ; �",� . '� :' �-
<9'
vM•
fe:r5ti*,Ot)�-+a51t7,00per•ghe®torenrTexaoi�Fai .$3;ti0ikperstfeet°
ol`rannex$tiora;:petitlott+egc;ested'Zorse '..
°�tezgniwg :;, � "� �" "" -, ;w :�•., Regiaissied �Orie q
ek
,$xq0* per Sfaeacof `teZ6l i6q Pulltft "r
Punned tlnitetsplCfprr�ent - Mast�xpPia �� �� `
$60.00 10.
('tannedur* Deve!apr%en> F!fetlirairiary pfan "� " .�;
X
FLO—. $5040" M
..'Plaftnec) Unit,Devalopmcunt <Firt�11 Rian�mcluCiu►g�inat utl ivi re 4"
$'10 t� per'SMeea.of�subdivlsii�, peat, � �; , -�, „,• ..
POD-AdmJ1nislralive;Ghange
.'
Yl�tjr106' $idbC�VIS�n s.• `" ..m ". •'• .- w• , �. ..,y. �• r� •, ..w
Pretunfnary,5tjbdWisign
5i 1987
mat Sttbdivis - l o 4101�
f4nar -51 ivtsio►i<- mate lhan-4t
Fla: $170.0�' +'•$t0.t10 per sfie+et[ lat~•: ''' `""' � � :`�
M itiple arr{f y U6 Requests frt he i•M_Wd Fy It Zorlfng rs y -
dor-Rgsiden a ,Use�wRequTts, RH`Znj)irgB qL strfd � •�" '
F e!ytS85.0a
t��n�oralormir���s+�'i`lequesis;s, a. _`.�. �, � '•� � .. ��,^°• ..
.,t'aiaDup'f•fRm�;#ievi'8w� .:.� •� ;„.� -' m `�; ;,� �„„ �> �°"• <
F
ILAP Site-PIafi lReview .. �-^ `�WA
ireeY;$:1IO
t71h@P Spectti�tlaft Plan Review
Vacafionvf F OW far Easernegr
:Fe6: $ii.00*' jper stwet:of fiii ngrdocurr�ent . "°^ -�. ,:,,"w•
:Street4qame Chang a. ': ` ,,,: - :• '• -. ;��,•
&C shftt Oil filing iocurn It : M 4"" '"
PUD ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE
M
O
Description of the change and reason(s) for the request:
Planning Department: '
Action;
co
r Date:
m
co
ey:
CV
N_
o Building Inspection:
x Action:
L Date.
By:
z
Engineering:
Action:
0
Date:
F--
By:
0
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true
in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owr
action cannot lawfully be a000mplished.
Name:
Address:
Telephone: - 7�"
f c' orrect to the best of my knowledge and that
of the property without whose consent the requested
No Text
w aw
6arto.R1' ra �� '�S
tit
,s,at-poi
A�
i -
la 21 lle iNu6 PLO la 23 The Wqp
Statement of Planning Objectives
.......
Maa1 lw eavr• sling mw, x. •letud-a txa altt tla Gsnatene•l . t^allltx lwu ae on etl r•aemces.
e b x.weutw. rrleaewa�l i =' wG�ra xtt•r• Genera= w_1ttx. lm tpptewe •Y
t. .ante .. ,...� ..�..,M..p��... In t• . axw t� ;;�,.�;�e _ . _la-lxa axGta... .=x wxr.
.. e...la .at. •� ;^;; ^;e';t, xaa ;,t."`w uu.`�*::i,%�.: �.eW
evti�ir°s: �x.
�,rylxa'a w el eipi. :.n.e to rxt. ,n Z. ue. wl3
1 e t a _a,tc,a,w °itx`d xt chew at i a�llw^ea�an9`vatr-e 1e�ie
..axt tar te. ,_ lx.Gt raw. • x- • e el.,�.r te.e . c-lo�raitrlM TM
e. w^ ^yM sv,tea n,uw�ilsi axalw —It art tou, at w WuIY
rGv'o®tMMxtrHi tRu�`Sa`r
om`ll' u
WNW— OW. I.Pd t"
_.T
o;aiS I —zags
Owner Certification
oe`u °�:ee` x,trlcttaa. .:: rer n e. tee
vei6t.wy wsp,a
�
burM-r �Gu+Ey�r
i
nY �
4.
ray A6 �.
Dotes:
21�
Scale: T=50'
Tabulations
e[i.uty wning i• n.lev.ato bt to
xa[lm buueitg a
Parcel Size, Cross
«t.
. Ptlevtrlen 1, to b• md• op
Parcel Size, Net
of .-fwt via• eldavalk• a]onq each
lid...
•la• n: potl.a cr..e cenrc
Total Single Fan*Lots
.ei,q of a•aaopewtt w wn•i.c of
t au[im erea• et privet• arlvvey.
fb,c,h�
Resldeneal D&isity
lota 1, e, a W 6 e[e to be
egeipptl vlN en eppravtl c•e1amL1e1
Driveway CoVerage
ire mrint]•r •Nvto.
arty w t[uctien Lo conm�
lym•n n+wuaY aNl
.0 c:::.t.m.m•.
tl
ibt1[tl•a, ev/
itpYabtlwIn••
Pubic Street ROW
bMaal
toHowliav[otasout•ra
"W Space
nlatalrnqancws
aetip
n
relp6avurtivetl
oo[c
el
la[tEtle
dovw W r•epibllLy of
nmcin.
a%ol Vaa•prcM tltP Liotwe
yy
s
U0g
4U, -$
F) •
O
a U
0 L
JI8
6.46 ac 281,651 sf
6.14 ac 267,507 at
9
1 A uses/acre
Preininary
15,475 sf 5%e Slte Plan/Plat
14,144 sf 5%t
44248 sf 16%`
a 31 Mey 11:91
1 F`
t%1* F�ft
Notes
'• z:181 Ne.vmq trrl.r Nnee�r.twtNpr.
antng Schedule - Proposed
1 1 S —,-,r s rry. due P ^ra T I} ti'P'
1 �j Iq�eC��esFr, Ic:Wn...s v�¢�..�rr�Av.�. I B-1c' �Ai'J •. �tw'sTLL i w�Pm>�T G....s Rei..
t.Ur"
__—
A 3'1 Y �T IT ^1"eeiM �.�.M4✓ Rya. I�L.AR'�c. S..ry.. �r _ _-
rasa Sawn My "q ,Xfe--.weor, KU
.ems•, W _--rae� _ _ .ewer., w�+, •�s.y,� _ '_-e _ ._
s. m+_T-Y"r✓. 'w+.rwl �nr� n�, e,_ae.e,�•e+*.-."w.�+�T _ — �� _ _
w�c cf.e• wean+, w.++�a. - _— _ - �^ - _ —
�y—
r..W,...r.nrr e
eaa.a� v+tE: 2� us� 4eac iNTeonsc.�e+)..w_. smywl-m ma+p�rt W/ pr ra.-u� �+*tA�s
00
Legend - EXIStflg VegetatlOn
4+4- + T?E-�
[mira'IH+me
I.tYrJ4u r
cP °od
—141o.b +r arr arMgs.
Generall
LandsWhq
Plan
e \
Pot-eN+ia( �.
Access � i��
Fo+evi_ I io,�
,Access
J. �mo
ie
�evt%'ral 1
ccess
1
/ Hepplewh'.4-e
Poi-eN�-�a1
,d,ccess
I
J
I I
HeFf)ewki+e
r;vie 0a+uv`,A( Av_eA
"Ou
-LAUR HE ION
ION
ProjeC� Si�e�
N
•
0
2:
GV 1
/,--}o V 'Lo'
2
el n
Private Driveway
Wooded Creek Court
Street Cross Sections
}O : �L "t---
+VL) Lim
-21
%&7111-1-1
Laurie Subdivision PUD JACK JOHNSON
OV
Ft. Collins, Colorado COMPANYLand Planning • Arch,twure • Civil Engineering
1910 P—p .r Ave., Suite 200 • Park City, Utah 84W
31 May 1991 801-645-9000 • FAX 801-649-1620
•
•
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
PROPOSAL: 44-89C SOUTH SHIELDS VETERINARY CLINC, 2nd FILING PUD
DESCRIPTION: 9 sf residences on 6.44 acres
DENSITY: 1.4 du/acre
General Population
9 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 31.5
School Age Population
Elementary - 9 (units) x .450(pupil s/units) = 4.05
Junior High - 9 (units) x •210(pupi1s/unit) = 1.89
Senior High - 9 (units) x .185(pupiIs/unit) = 1.67
Affected Schools Design Enrollment
Capacity
Johnson Elementary 546 660
Blevins Junior High 900 908
Rocky Mountain Senior High 1250 1150
du
ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
CRITERION
Is the CrltenOn apphCOOle,
Will the CrCenOn
be sofistZ)
If no, please explain
0,�`�F�°'°°°a
Yes No
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY
1. Social Compatabllity
2. Neighborhood Character
3. Land Use Conflicts
4. Adverse Traffic Impact
PLANS AND POLICIES
5. Comprehensive Plan
PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY
6. Street Capacity
X
7. Utility Capacity
8 Design Standards
9 Emergency Access
10 Security Lighting
'FIE-7-7
11 Water Hazards
RESOURCE PROTECTION
12 Soils & Slope Hazard
13 Significant vegetation
X
(aLiqtkneMedto
14 Wildlife Habitat
KX
15 Historical Landmark
16 Mineral Deposit
17 Eco-Sensitive Areas
18 Agricultural Lands
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
19 Air Quality
Y,
20 Water Quality
21 Noise
X
22 Glare & Heat
}�
23 Vibrations
24 Exterior Lighting
25. Sewages & Wastes
SITE DESIGN
26. Community Organization
27. Site Organization
28. Natural Features
o
29. Energy Conservation
3C. Shadows
31. Solar Access
32. Privacy
33. Open Space Arrangement
X
34. Building Height
}�
35. Vehicular Movement
36. Vehicular Design
37, Parking
38. Active Recreational Areas
39 Private Outdoor Areas
40. Pedestrian Convenience
41. Pedestrian Conflicts
42. Landscaping/Open Areas
43. LandscapingiBuildings
44. LanascapingrScreening
,1(
45. Public Access
I
4-) Signs
—12—
Aik f ood fU61M ro p
ACTIVITY: fees ident is I Uses
DEFINITION:
All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings,
townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group
homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing
homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec-
reational uses as a principal use; uses providing meeting places and places
for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers.
CRITERIAEach of the following applicable criteria must be
answered "yes" and implemented within the develop-
ment plan.
Yes No
1. On a gross acreage basis, is the
average residential density in the
project at least three (3) dwelling
units per acre (calculated for
residential portion of the site only)? ❑
2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM
PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON
THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR
THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESI-
DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED
CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ® ❑
SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
100 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE.
—29—
•
phllp'o --,In T� r IT-)
w�■ sv vvvr I ..w
DENSITY CHART
Maximum
Earned
Criterion
Credit
If All Dwelling Units Are Within:
Crec,,*
a
20 0
2000 feet of on existing or acorovea nejgnoornooc motor,; center.
b
100,0
650feet ofonexjmngtransit sioc
C
10 /0
4000 feet of an emstng or aoorovea regional sn000tng center
d
20%
3500 feet of an existing or reservea netgnoornooa car,& community Dark or communnv faakty
_1
LLJ
U)of
e
10%
1000 fear of 0 5ChOp4. meeting all me reoujrements of fne comoucsory eaucanon Ipws of ins Stare CdIXOOo.
Qf
20%
3000feet ofamaroremoKwmentcenter
co9
55%
1000tee, ofacneocore center
h
20%
worm-FonCoillru
I
20%
TneCentral 6ustrjessDismct.
A protect wnosa Dourspary Is contiguous to ens tr+g urban oevoiap rent. Creaft rnov be earnea as fbsl
0% — For Drotects wnose DrODarty bounoory its 0 to 10% cbrrtqulry.
j
30or
10 to 15% — For protects whose Dtooerry OOurXX ry nos 10 to 20% c vvuM.
io
15 to 20% —For oraecn whose brooem Dounoary nos 20 to 30%connquty
20 to 25% — For projects whose Drooenv baxloory nas 30 to 40% conttgwoy
25 to 30%— For protects wnos property ooursaaN nos 4o to 5o% con"wry
k
I I con me oemonstrctee mot e
me crotecr will reauce ran-renwaoee energy useoge ermer mMe �� �
Day
systems or mrougn COfnnvtrea energy conservation measures Devon that f-Crrno, reb r.fea C&v Coos. a 5% Donus may be eamea
10<every 5%reauCtiOn in energy use.
ss'
I
CCiculate a 1% bonus for every 50 acres inclucea in me crolect.
m
CCIaulate the DerCentOge at me total OCtes m me project mat are Oeyomc to recreanoncii use. enter V2 of that percentage as a o0nui
n
tt the aDOI Cant COMMM to oresenrN perrnOnent OflLte Open SOOCe mar meets the cnVs mtntmun rW"fernenm C.Ilculate the percentage
oil Ober, sooce acreage to me total oevetocr t acreage, enter ma oercenttope as a Dona:.
tt can Of the total aeyefobmenr touaget Is to be scent On nejgnDornooe Duck Ortvt taGl t es wncn are not otrwwtse reaurea by City Cope.
O
enter 2% borku for every S 100 per awemng unit investec.
tt pan at?" total Oevetooment buaget is to be scent on nergntoornooa facilities ano services wnjU+ are not orwwr se required by Citv Cone.
p
enter 01% bonus for every S100 per awelkrlg unit trwestei
q
tt a Cor vnMItfenl Is betng micoe to oeyetoo a soecrlfea percentage or the tarat nurnew at aryl W1g uvfs for Iow income tom.10s. enter Mat
to 30%.
oercentoge as a conu& uc a mox+mum of
Z
If a cortmNnent is being moos to aevdoo a sicec tiiea oercentoge of me ta" NJTCW of 0-Mil ure for Type -A- ana Type T- hondic000eo
rroustng m oetinea by the ON of Fort Catuu calcwate tre Darks as toil
O
r
type A - Stfines Type
Trmunm
Type-r—Infuses Type-rurvh
Total urvts
In no case stsau the cornbtnea bonus be greotef man 30%.
tt"vie or oataccenr Droberry conttnns an r)=rtc Oulang or plai a bocci may be eorne0 for the foam—q
3% — For oreventing or mftK;artng ourvoe infkrences B.¢ erworvnernoL Iona use. aiii econortvc OnC social factors) OWeRe to m
preservation:
S
3% — For assuring tnar new struc-aes vnu be to kaeang wrtn me cnaroclw of me oukf ng or oloce. wnde avotong rota untts
3 _ — For DroboslN oocattve use or the ouilaing or oloce ttsot wui eac -a rrs contirxlonca. preservation Ono jmplovert-enr In an
oloorotxtcre mannef
tt a carton or all of"reourea parking In the mumote tamlry Drbjeal IS DaJoao unOergrbuIna wnmin the bulays¢ or n an ew.,atea pon ng
structure as an occessory use fo fie Dnmary structure. a bonus mcy be eofnec as tolio+ri
t
o% — For oroylaing 75%or more of me parking In a sructure.
6% — For provtaing 50-74%at the corking Ina smrcture.
3% — For Drc.ia,ng 25-40% of me parking in a structue.
u
t o commrrtrjenr Is D&,g rnoae to orovtoe aporcvea CJrOrnatic lire exnnguaning systems tar me awellIng unni enter a bonus Of 10%
TOTAL
Laurie Subdivision 8/05/91
Second Filing
Statement of Planning objectives
A. The objective of the clan is to effectively utilize the 6.44
acre site for low densitv residential development while
maintaining the environmental qualities of the site.
B. All portions of the site will be maintained by individual
owners or the home owners association.
C. There are no businesses or employees proposed for the second
filing.
p, The site design is is intended to mitigate the impact of the
access road accross the irrigation runoff revine that is located
on the site. The relocation of the access road is the most
feasible location for the road and allows the development of the
site without destruction of the treeline hillside. The access
road will not appear intrusive to the site from the lower visible
locations in The Ridge subdivision. Building envelopes will be
selected that create the least -disruption to the site. A height
restriction will be imposed based on terrain characteristics of
the site that insure that both on and off site property owners
have an unrestricted view accross the site.
E. The master plan for the property was approved at a density of
1.5 dwelling units an acre. This density was 1/2 the lowest
recommended density of the land development guidance system, but
was selected to achieve a conformity with a surrounding land use
in The Ridge subdivision. The enclosed point chart indicates
that the residential portion of the project can achieve an earned
credit of 357. if each dwelling unit is required to have in their
Energy Score Rating of 80 versus the city minimum requirement of
G-70 for homes heated with gas fuel.
F. Conflicts between land uses are being mitigated by using
similar densities as the subdivision to the west. Other elements
that will be incorperated in the Laurie subdivision to mitigate
land use conflicts are the following:
1. Shake shingles will be required on all residences
2. No clearing of trees will be allowed unless approved by
the home owners association and the city forester, as stated on
the plat of the subdivision.
3. There will be minimum of 1400 square feet required for a
single level home and a minimum total of 2200 square feet
required on multi floors of a structure.
4. The finish of the exterior on the homes is required to
be earth tone with all exterior features approved prior to
construction.
•
0
5. There will be a maximum heightspecified on each building
envelope to restrict the height of buildings.
G. The method used to reduce energy consumption will be a
requirement that each residence prior to construction be
designed using City of Ft. Collins Energy Score System. A rating
of G-80 or above will be required on each residence. This is 10
points higher than a G-70 rating. The total annual energy
savings for the nine residential units is estimated at
approximately $150.00/dwelling unit or a total of approximately
$1400.00 annually.
Development Phasing Schedule
This proiect will be completes in one phase with the start of
construction estimated in the spring of 1992.
1
No Wtwpf- Shee
LOT uvMBEF 1 of
20 � c\ �o go I accP. k6F' 1 of
\ \ 5090 I < Ff r*T. Fl>z�i FLa R •
py Pvc eGr PEa1; ELG-
i
90 \ \\� 1 of i 1 �� —`�` H F r--
sm
} l 1 sz
F� (,YARD 3 of
\------------ I 4 of
Tim
ghCo Slob. f— — — — — 7 ' r — — � -FIHN& I 5
of
NeD 1,14' 9rPJcfi pwN.ry—` `FFq / `SMP •
PLA
M I" CER
I0 city
Pi' ..R�vGt:1.vR.
-� _
CRUK-C
-
Usecret
.N'Jv,L M _.- ... JFw ��_:. :.1' i--_— E/``3EMEIIr \ \ / /�. \ F� /- Erg" f - ..� ol•r------_---_ _� Cry OW
AML
Yu• ': •'fa`% i 47s°G 12b f MFato
I .06 A1.kfiE: SEL GRs,ANG I SIot aeac=;
\ ,� Y �,AW �a>� 114N I u�INw 0 stte
l LML1 rl-ft� \� fop- -z' 9a1NTa25
i
t l —��
�' WG•73 NO
L— ----- -
\ ._ I No N
s s 2.93
�H15 i
\Im pl 19ae EC
' 40 SD r o jn Lq
N G»I� 32 .41 I � 30 fxreTlWc '
—� S&.V,A r4- lfr- Site Data
�f Z4 R1rr�E PW - �t2bw�,; auvMINAKAICIIDIOND ASSOCIATE'S * Total Acreage 4 at
qb d I LAU R 1 E SUBOIVS 1 O N Arclattecta/PLccnn.era * Lot Total 76 a!
SECOND FILING, A P.U.D. 420 WNST OAK STnetT
fi=o Vpufybsrq
Preliminary Plan/Plat FT. COLLINS, CO 60821 (303)224-3.140 * Public R.O.W. Total .68 al
A. The obiective of the plan is to effectively utilize the 6.44
: Density: 9 D.U. @ 1.4 DU/acre'
acre site for low density residential development while
maintaining the environmental qualities of the siti. * Approximately 3.5 Bedrooms pe',
B. All portions of the site will be maintained by individual
- - owner. of the site. * Building Coverage 6.4X
C. There are. no businesses or employees proposed for the second
- filing. * Driveway Coverage 3.2%
-- P. The site design is the result of trying Co mitigate the
impact of the access road accro.x the irrigation runoff rev ins
that i located on the site. The relocation of the access road * PUb11C R.O.W. 11 .OX
,s then moat feasible location for the road and allows the
development of the site without destruction of the treeline
fl MA-4 tt�IGth' WO of F MN'gH'M. WrfN f Ka'T hillside. The access road wiu not appear intrusive to the nice * Off Street Parking 3.5 pe.
�1 r- LML N� from the lower visible location. ,n The Ridge subdivision.
Bulld ing envelope. will be selected Ghat create the leant
disruption to the site. A height restriction will be ,mponed * Open Area 79.4%
iIOH��J , ,.r��4,/�t 6��1 `Gij�i (�•(I�L based on terrain char acterist is a of tfie Bite that ,nears that
+✓ 1 both on and otf it property owners have an unreatz icted vie,
accro.s the
site—
H. The master plan for the property s s approved et a density oC 6. The finish it the exterior on eae homes will 1
'.'.,:ended
units acre. This density wdA 1/2 the incest to be earth tone with all exterior features approv,
_ recommended density of ache land development guidance system, but construct ion.
I was ae l acted to achieve a conformity with a purr oundimg land use
T. An addition landscape buffer will be ply
in The Ridge aubdiviaion. The enclosed point chart indicated Southwest portion of the site.
!tw _ that the residential portion o[ the Protect can achieve an earned a d. There will be a maximum height specified on sal
•/. credit of 15i of each^dwAn ing quoit to required to have in their envelope to restrict the height of buildings.
c a an oar ud the city minimum requirement of