HomeMy WebLinkAboutFAIRWAY APARTMENTS - PDP210005 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN
TO: City of Fort Collins Forestry Department
DATE: June 9, 2021
RE: Tree Removal Feasibility Letter for Fairway Apartments, Fort Collins CO
The following trees are proposed to be removed and mitigated at the Fairway Apartments property
located at the northwest corner of West Fairway Lane and South College Avenue. An intensive design
effort was made to save as many trees on the site as possible. We were able to preserve a majority of
the Honey locust trees along the northern perimeter of the site that will function as a buffer between the
project and the adjacent Spradley/Barr Ford dealership.
The site will include 262 mitigation trees as required by the City Forester and Fort Collins Municipal
Code.
Please refer to the tree exhibits on landscape sheets LS04 and LS05 that correspond to this list.
1. Honey locust (37”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#1 per tree inventory plan). This tree
does not conflict with the development of the property.
2. Honey locust (16”) – Mitigation Required: 1.5 Trees, poor condition (#2 per tree
inventory plan This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was
determined that due condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
3. Honey locust (22”) – Mitigation Required: 1.5 Trees, poor condition (#3 per tree
inventory plan). This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was
determined that due condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
4. Honey locust (19”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#4 per tree inventory plan). This tree
does not conflict with the development of the property.
5. Honey locust (30”) – Retain, fair condition (#5 per tree inventory plan). This tree does not
conflict with the development of the property.
6. Honey locust (21”) – Retain, fair condition (#6 per tree inventory plan). This tree does not
conflict with the development of the property.
7. Honey locust (21”) – Retain, fair condition (#7 per tree inventory plan). This tree does not
conflict with the development of the property.
8. Black locust (17”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#8 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the parking lot.
9. Black locust (13”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor condition (#9 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the parking lot.
10. Black locust (16”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#10 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the proposed parking lot.
11. Black locust (18”,18”) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, fair condition (#11 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the proposed
parking lot.
12. Black locust (10”,4”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor condition (#12 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the proposed
parking lot.
13. Black locust (7”-13”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#13 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the proposed
parking lot.
14. Black locust (6”-7”) – Retain, poor condition (#14 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
15. Green Ash (9”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair plus condition (#15 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflicts with the location of
Building 5, as well as grading and construction efforts. Due to the site constraints, there
are limited options for building orientation, all of which conflict with this tree.
16. Mulberry (6”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#16 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
17. Black locust (9”,10”) – Retain, fair condition (#17 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
18. Honey locust (21”,19”) – Retain, fair condition (#18 per tree inventory plan). This tree
does not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
19. Honey locust (15”) – Retain, fair condition (#19 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
20. Ponderosa pine (14”) – Retain, fair condition (#20 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
21. Ponderosa pine (19”) – Retain, fair condition (#21 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
22. Honey locust (12”,13”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#22 per tree inventory plan). This
tree does not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
23. Honey locust (18”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#23 per tree inventory plan). This tree
does not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
24. Honey locust (8”-22”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#24 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with the proposed
emergency access road on the north side of property.
25. Honey locust (28”) – Retain, poor condition (#25 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
26. Honey locust (24”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#26 per tree inventory plan). This tree
does not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
27. Honey locust (20”) – Retain, poor condition (#27 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
28. Honey locust (24”) – Retain, fair condition (#28 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
29. Honey locust (31”) – Retain, fair condition (#29 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
30. Honey locust (23”) – Retain, fair condition (#30 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
31. Honey locust (19”,27”) – Retain, fair condition (#31 per tree inventory plan). This tree
does not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
32. Honey locust (13”,14”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor condition (#32 per tree
inventory plan). This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was
determined that due condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
33. Honey locust (22”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor condition (#33 per tree
inventory plan). This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was
determined that due condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
34. Honey locust (20”) – Retain, fair condition (#34 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
35. Honey locust (27”) – Retain, fair condition (#35 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
36. Honey locust (18”,20”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#36 per tree inventory plan). This
tree does not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
37. Honey locust (20”,15”, 20”) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, poor condition (#37 per tree
inventory plan). This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was
determined that due condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
38. Honey locust (22”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#38 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with a utility line.
39. Scotch pine (25”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#39 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the sidewalk. Multiple
meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The walk is required
per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
40. Scotch pine (13”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#40 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to close proximity of grading and
construction efforts on the east side of Building 6.
41. Scotch pine (11”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#41 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the sidewalk. Multiple
meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The walk is required
per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
42. Scotch pine (15”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#42 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the sidewalk. Multiple
meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The walk is required
per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
43. Scotch pine (12”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#43 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the sidewalk. Multiple
meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The walk is required
per Staff as depicted on the current plans
44. Pear (16”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair plus condition (#44 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the proposed parking lot.
45. Green ash (15”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#45 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the proposed parking lot.
46. Cottonwood (15”-20”) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, fair minus condition (#46 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to close proximity of grading and
construction efforts on the northeast side of Building 3.
47. Cottonwood (7”-11”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#47 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
48. Cottonwood (9”,12”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#48 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
49. Russian Olive (13”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, fair minus condition (#49 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict proposed building.
50. Russian Olive (11”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, fair minus condition (#50 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
51. Russian Olive (11”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, fair minus condition (#51 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
52. Cottonwood (5”-10”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#52 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction efforts of proposed building.
53. Cottonwood (9”,10”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#53 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction efforts of proposed pedestrian walkway.
54. Cottonwood (16”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#54 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and construction
efforts of proposed building.
55. Cottonwood (13”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#55 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and construction
efforts of proposed building and walkway.
56. Cottonwood (10”-13”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#56 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking
lot.
57. Cottonwood (9”-13”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#57 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed walkway,
as well as grading and construction efforts.
58. Green ash (28”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair condition (#58 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the pedestrian walkway.
Multiple meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The walk is
required per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
59. Ponderosa pine (18”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#59 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the pedestrian
walkway. Multiple meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The
walk is required per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
60. Cottonwood (9”,10”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#60 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
61. Honey locust (9”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, fair plus condition (#61 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
62. Green ash (29”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, poor condition (#62 per tree inventory
plan). This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was determined
that due to poor condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
63. Green ash (17”, 23”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#63 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
64. Spruce (25”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#64 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
65. Pinyon pine (12”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#65 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking
lot.
66. Boxelder (19”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor condition (#66 per tree inventory
plan). This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was determined
that due to poor condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
67. Spruce (11”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor condition (#67 per tree inventory plan).
This tree is proposed for removal due to close proximity of grading and construction
activities on the north side of Building 7.
68. Green ash (18”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair plus condition (#68 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to close proximity of grading and
construction efforts on the north side of Building 7.
69. Spruce (9”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor condition (#69 per tree inventory plan).
This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was determined that
due to poor condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
70. Green ash (26”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, poor condition (#70 per tree inventory
plan). This tree was evaluated during an on-site meeting with Forestry. It was determined
that due to poor condition of the tree that it was best to remove and mitigate.
71. Green ash (21”-25”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair condition (#71 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with a utility line.
72. Maple (3”-9”) – Retain, fair condition (#72 per tree inventory plan). This tree does not
conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site (right-of-way
tree).
73. Western Catalpa (32”) – Mitigation required:4 Trees, fair condition (#73 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
74. Green ash (21”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#74 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
75. Green ash (23”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#75 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
76. Green ash (23”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#75 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
77. Green ash (26”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#77 per tree inventory plan). This tree
does not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site (right-
of-way tree).
78. Green ash (33”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#78 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to close proximity of grading and
construction activities on the south side of Building 7 and a pedestrian walkway.
79. Honey locust (28”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#79 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the sidewalk that
runs along College Avenue. Multiple meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering
and Forestry. The walk is required per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
80. Green ash or Siberian Elm (5”-9”, 8 stem) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor plus
condition (#80 per tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict
with the sidewalk that runs along College Avenue. Multiple meetings have been held with
Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The walk is required per Staff as depicted on the
current plans.
81. Green ash (24”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#81 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with grading and
construction activities of the proposed detention pond.
82. Crabapple (13”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#82 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with grading and
construction activities of the proposed detention pond.
83. Crabapple (8”-10”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#83 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with proposed parking
lot.
84. Green ash (36”) – Mitigation required: 4 Trees, fair minus condition (#84 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with proposed parking
lot.
85. Ponderosa pine (21”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#85 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with proposed parking
lot.
86. Ponderosa pine (22”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#86 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with proposed parking
lot.
87. Ponderosa pine (26”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair plus condition (#87 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with proposed parking
lot.
88. Cedar (18”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair condition (#88 per tree inventory plan).
This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and construction activities of
proposed walkway.
89. Spruce (22”) – Retain, fair minus condition (#89 per tree inventory plan). This tree does
not conflict with the development of the property and will be preserved on site.
90. Silver Maple (59”) – Mitigation required: 5 Trees, fair minus condition (#90 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the pedestrian
spine. Multiple meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The
walk is required per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
91. Green ash (9”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair plus condition (#91 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to a conflict with the pedestrian
spine. Multiple meetings have been held with Planning, Engineering and Forestry. The
walk is required per Staff as depicted on the current plans.
92. Siberian Elm (24”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor plus condition (#92 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with development
(amenity area).
93. Green ash (18”, 20”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#93 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed walkway.
94. Boxelder (32”, 8”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor plus condition (#94 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
95. Honey locust (15”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#95 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with development
(amenity area).
96. Honey locust (15”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#96 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking lot.
97. Crabapple (18” base, < 4.5’ tall) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition
(#97 per tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with
grading and construction efforts of proposed building and walkway.
98. Ponderosa pine (18”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair condition (#98 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
99. Silver Maple (24”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#99 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking
lot.
100. Silver Maple (21”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#100 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking
lot.
101. Spruce (20”) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, fair plus condition (#101 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
102. Aspen (4”-6”, 7 stem) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair condition (#102 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking
lot.
103. Siberian Elm (4”-10”, 8 stem) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, fair condition (#103 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking
lot.
104. Crabapple (6”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor plus condition (#104 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to close proximity of proposed
building, as well as grading and construction activities.
105. Cedar (8”-10”, 3 stem) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#105 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed
building.
106. Green ash (14”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#106 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
107. Pear (9.5”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#107 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
108. Cedar (9”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair condition (#108 per tree inventory plan).
This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
109. Siberian Elm (13”) – Mitigation required: 1 Trees, poor plus condition (#109 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
110. Siberian Elm (10”) – No Mitigation Required, fair minus condition (#110 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is in poor conflicts with the proposed building, as well as
grading and construction activities.
111. Siberian Elm (6”,8”) – No Mitigation Required, fair minus condition (#111 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is in poor conflicts with the proposed building, as well as
grading and construction activities.
112. Siberian Elm or Green Ash (4”-12”, 16 stems) – Mitigation Required: 2 Trees, fair minus
to poor plus condition (#112 per tree inventory plan). This tree is in poor conflicts with the
proposed parking lot. This group of trees also conflicts with grading and construction
activities of the proposed detention pond.
113. Cedar (7”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#113 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed walkway.
114. Hackberry (23”) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, fair condition (#114 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and construction
activities of proposed detention pond.
115. Green ash (13”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#115 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
116. Siberian Elm (9.5”) – No Mitigation Required, fair minus condition (#116 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
117. Green ash (8”-16”, 7 stem) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor plus condition (#117
per tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
118. Siberian Elm (17”) – No Mitigation Required, poor condition (#118 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and construction
activities of proposed detention pond.
119. Cedar (8”, 8”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#119 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed building.
120. Green ash (16”, 16”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#120 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed
access road.
121. Siberian Elm (34”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#121 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
122. Green ash (22”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#122 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
123. Green ash (22”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair to fair minus condition (#123 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
124. Bur Oak (20”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#124 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
125. Green ash (24”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor plus condition (#125 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
126. Green ash (28”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#126 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
127. Green ash (13”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor plus condition (#127 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
128. Green ash (24”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#128 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
129. Green ash (11”, 14”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#129 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
130. Green ash (20”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#130 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
131. Green ash (23”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#131 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building.
132. Green ash (16”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#132 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building and walkway.
133. Green ash (15”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#133 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed building and walkway.
134. Green ash (20”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#134 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed walkway.
135. Green ash (14”, 14”) – No Mitigation Required, poor condition (#135 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and construction
activities of proposed walkway.
136. Green ash (22”, 20”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#136 per
tree inventory plan. This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed
access road.
137. Green ash (17”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor plus condition (#137 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
138. Green ash (19”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#138 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
139. Green ash (16”) – Mitigation required: 1 Tree, poor condition (#139 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed walkway.
140. Green ash (21”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#140 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
141. Green ash (24”, 20”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#141 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
142. Green ash (24”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#142 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
143. Green ash (17”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#143 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
144. Green ash (24”, 8”, 8”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#144 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
145. Green ash (20”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#145 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with grading and
construction activities of proposed detention pond.
146. Green ash (16”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#146 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed walkway.
147. Green ash (13”, 18”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#147 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed
parking lot
148. Green ash (8”, 11”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#148 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking
lot.
149. Mulberry (8”, 3 stem) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#149 per
tree inventory plan).
150. Green ash (16”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#150 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
151. Green ash (23”) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, fair condition (#151 per tree inventory
plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed parking lot.
152. Green ash (16”) – Mitigation required: 2 Trees, fair minus condition (#152 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed walkway.
153. Green ash (16”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#153 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
154. Green ash (14”, 16”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#154 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed
walkway.
155. Green ash (31”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#155 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
156. Green ash (26”) – Mitigation required: 1.5 Trees, poor plus condition (#156 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
157. Green ash (20”) – Mitigation required: 2.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#157 per tree
inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed access
road.
158. Green ash (4”-10” varied, 30 stems) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, fair to fair minus
condition (#158 per tree inventory plan). This group of trees is proposed for removal due
to conflict with proposed detention pond.
159. Green ash (23”, 23”) – Mitigation required: 3.5 Trees, fair minus condition (#159 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed
detention pond.
160. Green ash (24”) – Mitigation required: 3 Trees, fair to fair minus condition (#160 per
tree inventory plan). This tree is proposed for removal due to conflict with proposed
detention pond.