HomeMy WebLinkAboutSYMBIOS LOGIC OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 5-94D - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESCouncil Liaison: Gina Janett Staff Liaison:
Chairperson: Gwen Bell Phone: (H) 221-3415
Vice Chair: Glen Colton Phone: (H) 225-2760 (W) 679-3201
The meeting was called to order at 6:34 p.m.
Roll Call: Davidson, Gavaldon, Strom, Byrne, Mickelsen, Colton. Chairperson
Bell was absent.
Staff Present: Ludwig, Shepard, Ashbeck, Wamhoff, Stanford, Herzig, Bracke,
Frank, Vosburg, Duvall, Mapes, Baker, Frazier, Blanchard, Deines.
Agenda Review: Bob Blanchard, Director of Current Planning reviewed the Consent
and Discussion Agenda's, which consisted of the following:
1.
Minutes of March 25, 1996 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
(Continued).
2.
#5-94D
Symbois Logic - Overall Development Plan
3.
#5-94E
Symbois Logic PUD, Phase I - Preliminary
4.
#55-84G
Ridgewood Hills, 2nd Filing - Final
5.
#3-90C
Villages at Harmony West PUD - Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints - Amended Final
6.
#13-96
1435 South College Avenue PUD - Preliminary and Final
7.
#8-96
The Greens at Collindale PUD - Preliminary (Continued)
8.
#50-95A
Jefferson Commons PUD - Final
9.
Modifications of Conditions of Final Approval
10.
Resolution PZ96-7 Easement Vacation
11.
Resolution PZ96-8 Easement Vacation
12
Resolution PZ96-9 Easement Vacation (Continued)
13.
Recommendation to City Council Regarding Amending Article
VI of Chapter 29 of the City Code.
Discussion Agenda:
14. #55-95A Recommendation to City Council Regarding the Preferred City
Structure Plan Alternative/City Plan.
15. Recommendation to City Council Regarding the Master Street
Plan.
16. Recommendation to City Council Regarding Proposed New
Street Width Standards.
17. Recommendation to City Council Regarding the Increase in
Street oversizing Fees.
Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
June 24, 1996
Page 2
Member Mickelsen moved for approval of Consent Agenda Items 2, 3 (with
variance for height over 40 feet), 4, 5, 6 (with variance from the Business uses
point chart), 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13.
Member Gavaldon seconded the motion.
The motion was approved 6-0.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE STRUCTURE PLAN AS
PART OF CITY PLAN
Joe Frank, Director of Advance Planning gave the staff report. Mr. Frank stated this
was the next step in the City Plan process after the Visions and Goals 2015 document.
He stated this plan would establish more precise and take some of the vision contained
in the 2015 document adopted in April and put it onto a map. Mr. Frank stated there
would be several spokes persons that would take the Board through the vision in the
plan, activity centers, the corridors, districts and edges.
Lou Stitzel, CPAC Member gave a presentation on the vision of the plan. She stated
that all the parts of the plan were necessary to have a community in which there are
positive choices, not only now, but in the future. Although the Structure Plan deals with
land, the second point is in reality to what we are working toward in providing a place
on the land for people. As such, with a vision it is that we are planning new ways to
which people can live together more comfortably. Ms. Stitzel spoke on the things that
we need in our community to make it a comfortable place to live. The Structure Plan is
the foundation for moving toward that. In order to check on does this Structure Plan
meet our realities, we have to first look at what is different here from what we have
been working on, our regular classic planning and zoning, and the way we have been
doing business.
Ms. Stitzel stated the first thing to think about was that this has Activity Centers that
have linkages, corridors, green spaces, and transportation; but, they also form hubs for
transportation and the various activity centers. In the activity centers, there are more
than just trade and commerce, grocery and convenience stores. There are parks,
places for people to go and gather and that they fee; comfortable going to. This
Structure Plan is an effort to balance different parts of the City to have a mix of housing,
a mix of incomes that are satisfied by various types housing, so that it is suitable quality
housing for people of all income levels.
Ms. Stitzel spoke on the development and balancing of the growth of the community.
She spoke on the function of the activity centers and the variety of services they would
have. She felt that this was an opportunity for us, using the basic foundation, the
structure of the Structure Plan to build something that people would be drawn to make