HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOOTHILLS PARKWAY PUD - PRELIMINARY - 36-89 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - APPLICATIONPLANNING DEPARTMENT
/ APPLICATION FORM
City of Fort Collins
Project Name: FOOTHILLS PARKWAY PUD AND MASTER PLAN Land Ilse Information
Project Number: 2-9014, 2-9015
Project Location or Street Address: Northwest corner
of College Avenue and Foothills Parkway
Today's Date: 7-5-89
Gross Acreage/Sq. Footage: 1.4709 AC / 64,074 SQ. FP.
Existing Zoning: - n,5
Proposed Use: Drive —up Restaurant / Auto Tune & Lube
Total Number of Dwelling Units: N.A.
• Total Commercial Floor Area: 3550 SQ.FT.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Owners Name: Steeles Markets
AHHroce. 309 West Mountain Avenue
Telephone
.40
482-2522
Applicants Name: Edward G. Zdenek, Architect
Address: 223 Linden Street, Suite 105
Telephone:
493-4105
TYPE OF REQUEST:
Contact Person: Ed Zdenek
Address: 223 Linden
Telephone:
Street, Suite 105
493-4105
Please indicate type of application submitted by checking the box preceding appropriate request(s). Combined requests, except for Final
PUD and Final Subdivision, require the combined individual fees. No application will be processed until all required information is provided.
Additional handouts are available explaining information requirements for each of the following review processes.
Annexation with Initial Zoning
Fee: $50.00 + $10.00 per sheet of annexation plat + $3.00* per sheet
of annexation petition Requested Zone
Rezoning Requested Zone
Fee: $50.00 + $3.00* per sheet of rezoning petition
Planned Unit Development - Master Plan
XX
Fee: $60.00
Planned Unit Development - Preliminary Plan
XX
Fee: $50.00
Planned Unit Development - Final Plan (including final subdivision)
Fee: $110.00 + $10.00 per sheet of subdivision plat
PUD Administrative Change
Fee: $5.00
Minor Subdivision
Fee: $150.00
Preliminary Subdivision
Fee: $50.00
Final Subdivision - 1 to 4 lots
Fee: $75.00
Final Subdivision - more than 4 lots
Fee: $110.00 + $10.00 per sheet of plat
Multiple -Family Use Requests in the R-M and R-H Zoning District
Fee: $85.00
Non -Residential Use Requests in the R-H Zoning District
Fee: $85.00
Non -Conforming Use Requests
Fee: $110.00
Group Home Review
Fee: $85.00
IVtP Site Plan Review
Fee: $110.00
Other Special Site Plan Review
Fee: $100.00
Vacation of ROW or Easement
Fee: $3.00* per Sheet of filing document
Street Name Change
Fee: $3.00* per sheet of filing document
5/1987
PUD ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE
Description of the change and reason(s) for the request:
Planning Department:
Action:
Date:
By:
Building Inspection:
Action:
Date:
By:
Engineering:
Action:
Date:
By:
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that
in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property without whose consent the requested
action cannot lawfully be accomplished.
Name: Edward G. Zdenek, Architect
Address: 223 Linden Street, Suite 105
Fort Collins C- 80 4
Telephone:
493-4105
4, ,
Lam, ,
Im,0
�— ds,
Sowl
job r
_ � I, ■r ■fir lm 61�['].:[Z7�� ■
iL
I WIN
ism pgmmg
Noma
mill Oij floor
IN - SaMM
\i
:�=a
Mims
M ft
PLANNING OBJECTIVES
Foothills Parkway P.U.D.
Master Plan and Preliminary P.U.D. Plan
July 5, 1989
Development of two (2) lots at the intersection of two major streets
(College Avenue and Foothills Parkway) is a ditticult task. The project is
being considered as a Master Plan that includes the existing Steeles Supermarket
to the west. Adjacent to the PUD are Colorado National Bank to the south,
Dellenbach Chevrolet to the north, and Good Year Tire Store to the east.
Important issues in the design of this project are:
Transportation
Architectural Compatibility
Landscape Continuity
Transportation solutions have been addressed in a trattic study prepared by
Matt Delich. Included are an additional right in, right out access to College
Avenue directly north of the PUD, a design in conformance with the south Fort
Collins access plan. The trontage road to the east of the project will be aban-
doned along with a portion of the right of way and replaced with private drives
on the north and west of the project, providing easier, sater access to adjacent
properties. In conjunction with this project the adjacent land owners have been
approached and are negotiating additional access to Swallow Drive to the north
of the project, turther improving circulation in the immediate area.
Architectural compatibility is a ditticult issue since both users of the
plan have unique architectural expressions as part of their marketing approach.
We have coordinated the colors and textures of the buildings with those of
Steeles Market. The unique shape of Good Times will be sheathed in 'drivit',
the same color and material that exists on Steeles while the upper portion of
the building will be colored similarly. Econo Lube and Tune will use similar
materials and textures. A common outdoor dining area will be provided between
the two buildings and be used as a landscaped element that is intended to tie
two buildings together at a pedestrian level.
Landscaping is an important issue in any commercial development and espe-
cially this one. The design of the site must incorporate strong continuity with
adjacent landscaping while borrowing parking and service areas and allowing
identitication of the communicable uses and visibility consistant with satety
for both pedestrians and vehicles. We have continued the regularly spaced
street trees with trees of similar genus. The internal landscaping has been
selected to screen unsightly areas (relocated pine trees located on the west of
the building adjacent to the trash area) while providing an environment of
changing color and texture throughout the growing season.
FOOTHILLS/submit
40
ft
We would estimate the peak shift employees to number twelve (12). The land
use conflicts are being mitigated by a combined vehicular and pedestrian access
system. The energy consumption on the proposed Econo Lube facility is being
minimized by use of glass doors to service bays to promote solar gain in winter,
and a radiant heating system that will maintain a lower ambient temperature
while providing comfort for employees working on vehicles. The Good Times Fast
Food Restaurant is small enough that the kitchen equipment provided the majority
of the heating requirement for the facility.
The applicable land use policies that the project meets are as follows:
3a. Promote maximum utilization of land within City
3b. Alternative transportation modes
14. Urban development standards
20. Understandable interrelationships
21. Primary access to College Avenue
22. Continuous development
24. Phased utilities
25. Directed growth
26. Available existing services
29. Services direct development
50. Mass transit used as a tool
FOOTHILLSI/submit
0
ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
CRITERION
Is the criterion applicable?
Will the crlterlon
be Satisfied?
If no, please explain
e.�'`,�'�°�0
Yes No
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY
1 Social Compotability
X
2 Neighborhood Character
3 Land Use Conflicts
4 Adverse Traffic Impact
PLANS AND POLICIES
5 Comprehensive Plan
PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY
6 Street Capacity
7 Utility Capacity
8 Design Standards
9 Emergency Access
10 Security Lighting
11 Water Hazards
RESOURCE PROTECTION
12 Soils & Slope Hazard
X
13 Significant Vegetation
X
14. Wildlife Habitat
x
15 Historical Landmark
16 Mineral Deposit
17 Eco-Sensitive Areas
18 Agricultural Lands
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
19 Air Quality
x
X
20 Water Quality
21 Noise
22. Glare & Heat
23. Vibrations
24 Exterior Lighting
25 Sewages & Wastes
SITE DESIGN
26 Community Organization
X
X
27 Site Organization
X
X
28 Natural Features
}{
20 Energy Conservation
30 Shadows
31 Solar Access
32 Privacy
x
33 Open Space Arrangement
34 Building Height
35 Vehicular Movement
X
X
36 Vehicular Design
X
X
37 Parking
38 Active Recreational Areas
39 Private Outdoor Areas
40 Pedestrian Convenience
X
X
41 Pedestrian Conflicts
X
X
42 Landscaping/Open Areas
43 Landscaping/Buildings
X
X
44 Landscaping/Screening
X
X
45 Public Access
4t Signs
ACTIVITY: Business Service Uses
DEFINITION
F
Those activities which are predominantly retail, office, and service uses
which would not qualify as or be a part of a neighborhood or commu-
nity/regional shopping center. Uses include: retail shops; offices; per-
sonal service shops; financial institutions; hotels/motels; medical clin-
ics; health clubs; membership clubs; standard and fast-food restaurants;
hospitals; mortuaries; indoor theatres; retail laundry and dry cleaning
outlets; limited indoor recreation uses; small animal veterinary clinics;
printing and newspaper offices; and, other uses which are of the same gen-
eral character.
CRITERIA: Each of the following applicable criteria must be
answered "yes" and implemented within the develop-
ment plan.
Yes No
1. Does the project gain its primary
vehicular access from a street other a
than South College Avenue?
2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST 50%
OF THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED T
ON "POINT CHART E" FOR THE FOLLOWING CR,TERIA?
a. Is the activity contiguous to an existing transit route (not appli-
cable for uses of less than 25,000 square feet GLA or with less
than 25 employees) or located in the Central Business District?
b. Is the project located outside of the "South College Avenue Corri-
dor?"
c. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a part of a neighbor-
hood or community/regional shopping center, an office or industrial
park, located in the Central Business District or in the case of a
single user, employ or will employ a total of more than 100 full-
time employees during a single 8-hour shift?
d.
Is the project on at least two acres of land or located in the Cen-
tral Business District?
conhnued--
-22—
*1
contirl-ed 0
e. Does the project contain two or more significant uses (such as
retail, office, residential, hotel/motel, and recreation)?
f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site
parking areas and adjacent existing or future off -site parking
areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces?
g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage, through the
application of alternative energy systems, use of existing build-
ings, and through committed energy conservation measures beyond
that normally required by City Code?
h. Is the project located with at least 1/6th of its property boundary
contiguous to existing urban development?
i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event
occurred, which has special public value because of notable archi-
tecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill
the following criteria.
i. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation;
ii. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping
with the character of the building or place. Imitation of
period styles should be avoided; and
iii. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will
lead to its continuance, conservation and improvement in an
appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the
neighborhood.
-23-
0 i
BUSINESS
SERVICE USES
POINT CHART E
For All Critera
Applicable Criteria Only
Criterion
Is The
Criterion
Applicable
Yes No
I II III IV
Circle
The
Correct
Score
Yes WJ' No
Multiplier
Points
Earned
yl
Maximum
Applicable
Points
a. Transit route
X
2
0
2
0
b. S. College corridor
X
IX
2
0
4
0
8
c. Part of center
X
X
2
0
3
6
6
d. Two acres or more
X
X
2
0
3
0
6
e. Mixed -use
X
X
2
0
3
6
6
f. Joint parking
1
2
0
3
6
g. Energy conservation
X
1
2
0
4
0
8
h. Contiguity
X
X
2
0
5
10
10
i. Historic preservation
1
2
0
2
0
j.
1
210
k.
1
2
0
1.
1
2
0
' WV — Very Well Done Totals 28 50
V VI
Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points VM =V11 56 %
VII
—24—