HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE QUARRY BY WATERMARK - PDP200019 - DOCUMENT MARKUPS - ROUND 3 - DRAINAGE REPORT
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
March 3, 2021
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM
970.221.4158
FORT COLLINS
GREELEY
This Drainage Report is consciously provided as a PDF. Please
consider the environment before printing this document in its entirety.
When a hard copy is necessary, we recommend double-sided printing.
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 FINAL DRAINAGE MEMO: THORNBURG HAMILTON FIFTH SUBDIVISION
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY COVER LETTER
March 3, 2021
City of Fort Collins
Stormwater Utility
700 Wood Street
Fort Collins, CO 80521
RE: PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR
THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
Dear Staff,
Northern Engineering is pleased to submit this Preliminary Drainage Report for your review. This report
accompanies the combined Preliminary Plan submittal for the proposed The Quarry by Watermark
This report has been prepared in accordance with the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) and
serves to document the stormwater impacts associated with the proposed The Quarry by Watermark housing
project. We understand that review by the City of Fort Collins is to assure general compliance with standardized
criteria contained in the FCSCM.
If you should have any questions as you review this report, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
MASON RUEBEL, EI DANNY WEBER, PE
Project Engineer Project Manager
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT: THORNBURG HAMILTON FIFTH SUBDIVISION
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................ 1
II. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS ..................................................................... 3
III. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA ................................................................................ 4
IV. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN ................................................................................. 6
V. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 10
VI. REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 10
TABLES AND FIGURES
Figure 1 – Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................1
Figure 2 – Aerial Photograph ..............................................................................................2
Figure 3 – FEMA Firmette (Map Numbers 08069CO978G and 08069CO979H) ..................3
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS
APPENDIX B – HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS
APPENDIX C – WATER QUALITY COMPUTATIONS
APPENDIX D – DETENTION POND & SWMM MODEL
APPENDIX E – EROSION CONTROL REPORT
APPENDIX F – USDA SOILS REPORT
APPENDIX G – FEMA FIRMETTE
MAP POCKET
DR1 – DRAINAGE EXHIBIT
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 1 | 21
I. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A. LOCATION
Vicinity Map
Figure 1 – Vicinity Map
The Quarry by Watermark project site is located in the northwest quarter of Section 23, Township
7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State
of Colorado.
The project site (refer to Figure 1) is bordered to the north by Hobbit Street; to the east by Canal
Importation Ditch; to the south by Spring Creek; and to the west by Shields Street.
Spring Creek and Canal Importation Ditch are a major drainageways located adjacent to the
project site. The confluence of Spring Creek and Canal Importation Ditch is in the southeast
corner of the site.
B. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Quarry by Watermark comprises of ± 19.38 acres.
The site is currently an undeveloped parcel surrounded by multi-family to the north, west, and
south and single-family homes to the east
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 2 | 21
Figure 2 – Aerial Photograph
The existing groundcover consists of short grasses. The existing on-site runoff generally drains
from the northwest to the southeast across flat grades (e.g., <1.00%) into the Canal Importation
Ditch. From there, the drainage continues through Canal Importation Ditch to Spring Creek, and
on to the Cache La Poudre River.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey website:
(http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx),
the site consists primarily of Altvan-Satanta loams (Hydrologic Soil Group B) and Nunn clay loam
(Hydrological Soil Group C).
Springs Creek and Canal Importation Ditch are the only major drainageways within or adjacent to
the project site.
The proposed development will consist of seventeen (17) townhome buildings containing a total
of 313 units with detached garages. Other proposed improvements include parking lots,
sidewalks, pool, clubhouse, and landscaping.
The proposed land use is multi-family. This is a permitted use in the Medium-Density Mixed-Use
Neighborhood District (MMN).
C. FLOODPLAIN
1. The eastern and southern edges of the site is in a FEMA regulatory floodplain; however, the
developable project area is outside of the FEMA floodplain. In particular, the FEMA designated
100-year floodplain Basins E1 and E2 on the Drainage Exhibit includes the FEMA regulatory
floodplains for Spring Creek and Canal Importation Ditch (Map Numbers 08069CO978G and
08069CO979H and effective date of May 2, 2012). The eastern portion on this site, along the Canal
Importation Ditch, is located within the City of Fort Collins Regulatory floodplain/floodway. No
development is proposed within Basins E1 and E2. A copy of the FEMA Firmette is provided in
Appendix G.
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 3 | 21
2. We have analyzed the FEMA Floodplain map and cross sections for Spring Creek and Canal
Importation Ditch and determined that the highest base flood elevation adjacent to the project
site is 5016 (NAVD88). All buildings have been elevated 1.5’ above this elevation. Furthermore, the
buildings all maintain a minimum of 12” between the finished floor elevation and the top of bank
along the south and east side of the property.
II. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS
A. Major Basin Description
The north and east halves of The Quarry by Watermark is located within the City of Fort Collins Canal
Importation major drainage basin. The southwest quarter of the site is located within the City of Fort
Collins Spring Creek major drainage basin. Specifically, the project site is situated at the confluence
of the Spring Creek and Canal Importation major drainage basins. Detention requirements for this
basin are to detain the difference between the 100-yr developed inflow rate and the historic 2-year
release rate.
B. Sub-Basin Description
The outfall for the project site is at the confluence of Springs Creek and Canal Importation Basins.
The existing subject site can be defined with twelve (22) sub-basins that encompasses the entire
project site and three (3) offsite basins that drain onto the project site.
The existing site runoff generally drains from northwest-to-southeast and into the Canal
Importation Ditch.
The project site receives runoff from Shields Street and Hobbit Street.
Figure 3 – FEMA Firmette (Map Numbers 08069CO978G and 08069CO979H)
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 4 | 21
III. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
A. Optional Provisions
There are no optional provisions outside of the FCSCM proposed with the Quarry by Watermark.
B. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
The overall stormwater management strategy employed with The Quarry by Watermark utilizes the
“Four Step Process” to minimize adverse impacts of urbanization on receiving waters. The following
is a description of how the proposed development has incorporated each step.
Step 1 – Employ Runoff Reduction Practices. The first consideration taken in trying to reduce the
stormwater impacts of this development is the site selection itself. By choosing an already developed
site with public storm sewer currently in place, the burden is significantly less than developing a
vacant parcel absent of any infrastructure.
The Quarry by Watermark aims to reduce runoff peaks, volumes and pollutant loads from frequently
occurring storm events (i.e., water quality (i.e., 80th percentile) and 2-year storm events) by
implementing Low Impact Development (LID) strategies. Wherever practical, runoff will be routed
across landscaped areas or through a rain garden or water quality pond. These LID practices reduce
the overall amount of impervious area, while at the same time Minimizing Directly Connected
Impervious Areas (MDCIA). The combined LID/MDCIA techniques will be implemented, where
practical, throughout the development, thereby slowing runoff and increasing opportunities for
infiltration.
Step 2 – Implement BMPs that Provide a Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) with Slow
Release. The efforts taken in Step 1 will help to minimize excess runoff from frequently occurring
storm events; however, urban development of this intensity will still have stormwater runoff leaving
the site. The primary water quality treatment will occur between underground vaults located at the
south end of the project and a single rain garden along the east side of the property. The remaining
runoff will be treated for water quality in the proposed detention ponds along the Spring Creek.
Step 3 – Stabilize Drainageways. As stated in Section I.B.6, above, the Spring Creek and Canal
Importation drainage is adjacent to the subject site, however no changes to the channel are proposed
with this project. While this step may not seem applicable to The Quarry by Watermark, the proposed
project indirectly helps achieve stabilized drainageways, nonetheless. Once again, site selection has a
positive effect on stream stabilization. By developing an infill site with stormwater infrastructure,
combined with LID and MDCIA strategies, the likelihood of bed and bank erosion and the frequency of
erosive flows are reduced. Furthermore, this project will pay one-time stormwater development fees,
as well as ongoing monthly stormwater utility fees, both of which help achieve Citywide drainageway
stability.
Step 4 – Implement Site Specific and Other Source Control BMPs. This step typically applies to
industrial and commercial developments.
C. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA REFERENCE AND CONSTRAINTS
The subject property is not part of any Overall Development Plan (ODP) drainage study or similar
“development/project” drainage master plan.
The site plan is constrained to the north and west by public streets, to the south by Spring Creek,
and to the east by the Canal Importation Ditch.
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 5 | 21
D. HYDROLOGICAL CRITERIA
The City of Fort Collins Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves, as depicted in Figure 3.4-1
of the FCSCM, serve as the source for all hydrologic computations associated with The Quarry by
Watermark development. Tabulated data contained in Table 3.4-1 has been utilized for Rational
Method runoff calculations.
The Rational Method has been used to estimate peak developed stormwater runoff from
drainage basins within the developed site for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year design storms.
Peak runoff discharges determined using this methodology have been used to check the street
capacities, inlets, swales, and storm drain lines.
Two separate design storms have been utilized to address distinct drainage scenarios. The first
event analyzed is the “Minor,” or “Initial” Storm, which has a 2-year recurrence interval. The
second event considered is the “Major Storm,” which has a 100-year recurrence interval.
E. HYDRAULIC CRITERIA
The drainage facilities proposed with The Quarry by Watermark project are designed in
accordance with criteria outlined in the FCSCM.
As stated in Section I.C.1, above, the subject property is located next to a FEMA designated
floodplain but is not located within the floodplain limits.
F. FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE
As previously mentioned, this project is adjacent to a FEMA regulated floodplain. The
developable area of the project is located outside of the floodplain, and as such, it will not be
subject to any floodplain regulations. However, the storm outfall will be located within the
floodway, and that work will be subject to the applicable floodplain regulations of Chapter 10 of
the City Municipal Code.
Despite most of the project not being located within the floodplain, consideration has been given
to the floodplain elevations as they relate to the proposed buildings and the finished floors have
been elevated accordingly.
G. MODIFICATIONS OF CRITERIA
There are no optional provisions outside of the FCSCM proposed with the Quarry by Watermark.
H. CONFORMANCE WITH WATER QUALITY TREATMENT CRITERIA
City Code requires that 100% of runoff from impervious surfaces in a project site shall receive some
sort of water quality treatment. This project proposes to provide water quality treatment using
several methods. A single rain garden will be located along the east edge of the site. Two separate
areas along the south side of the site will use underground chambers for treatment. Both areas will
discharge into two proposed detention ponds that will provide water quality for the remainder of the
site before discharge into the Canal Importation Basin. Due to the physical constraints associated
with an infill project of this nature and the prohibition of providing water quality facilities within the
public right-of-way, there are some small, narrow areas around the perimeter of the project that
cannot be captured. The uncaptured areas tend to be narrow strips of concrete flatwork that link the
building entrances to the public sidewalks as well as small planter beds between the building and
public sidewalks or property lines.
While these small areas will not receive formal water quality treatment, most areas will still see some
treatment as runoff is directed across through the landscaped areas or across the landscaped
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 6 | 21
parkways before reaching the roadway curb and gutter.
I. CONFORMANCE WITH LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID)
The project site will conform with the requirement to treat a minimum of 75% of the project site using
a LID technique. A single rain garden and underground chambers will be used to capture and filter or
infiltrate the water quality capture volume.
J. SIZING OF LID FACILITIES
Rain Gardens/Underground Chambers
1. The rain gardens and chambers were sized by first determining the required water quality
capture volume (WQCV) for Basins B1-B7 for the rain garden and Basins A2 & D4-7 for the
chambers. A 12-hour drain time was used in this calculation.
2. Once the WQCV was identified, each rain garden and chamber area were sized for its respective
WQCV. The rain gardens will be constructed with a biomedia filter and underdrain. An
overflow drain will be provided in each rain garden and weir for chambers to pass storms
greater than the WQCV.
Water Quality Pond
1. The water quality pond was sized by first determining the required water quality capture
volume (WQCV) for Basins D1 and A3. Offsite flows from Basins OS1 and OS2 (Shields Street)
will be treated in the water quality ponds. A 40-hour drain time was used in this calculation.
2. Once the WQCV was identified, the water quality pond was sized to provide the WQCV. An
outlet control structure with overflow will be provided to pass storms greater than the WQCV.
IV. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
A. GENERAL CONCEPT
1. The main objective of The Quarry by Watermark drainage design is to maintain existing
drainage patterns, while not adversely impacting adjacent properties
2. A list of tables and figures used within this report can be found in the Table of Contents at the
front of the document. The tables and figures are located within the sections to which the
content best applies.
3. Drainage for the project site has been analyzed using twenty-one (22) onsite drainage sub-
basins, designated as sub-basins A1- A2, B1-B7, C1-C2, D1-D7, E1-E2, and F1-F2. Furthermore,
there are three (3) offsite drainage sub-basins designated as sub-basins OS1, OS2, and OS3.
The drainage patterns anticipated for the basins are further described below.
Sub-Basins A1
Sub-Basins A1 encompasses approximately 7% of the total site area. Basin A1 contains
Detention Pond 1 which is the collection point of every sub-basin on site before release into the
Canal Importation Ditch. This pond, in conjunction with Detention Pond 2, will moderate the
release rate into the ditch during the Major Storm. An outlet structure with a restrictor plate will
be installed with Pond 1 and an outfall pipe will be used for the discharge into the Canal
Importation Ditch. Emergency Overflow from this pond will be directed into the Canal
Importation Ditch.
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 7 | 21
Sub-Basins A2
Sub-Basin A2 encompasses approximately 9% of the total site area. Basin A2 is comprised
primarily of roof area, concrete flatwork, parking lot and landscaped areas. This basin will drain
into a valley pan and curb and gutter located in the parking lot and be captured by an inlet and
storm drain. This area will be treated by Stormtech Chambers 2, located just south of the
collection point. The WQCV will be captured in these chambers during the minor storm and flow
from larger storms will then proceed to Detention Pond 1 and the Canal Importation Ditch.
Sub-Basin B1 – B7
Sub-Basins B1 through B7 encompasses approximately 36% the total site area. Basin B1 mainly
comprises of Rain Garden A, which will be the main treatment method for the B sub-basins. Minor
flows will be treated in this rain garden, while flows from larger storms will proceed to Detention
Pond 1 and to the Canal Importation ditch. The remaining sub-basins (B2-B7) are comprised
primarily of roof area, concrete flatwork, parking lot, and landscaped areas. The sub-basins will
drain into a valley pan and curb & gutter located within each sub-basin and towards a common
storm sewer. This common storm sewer will discharge into Rain Garden A. Storm sewers will be
sized to convey major storms.
Sub-Basin C1
Sub-basin C1 is comprised of an existing ditch along the north property line (Ditch C). This
existing ditch conveys runoff from OS3 (Hobbit Street) and discharges directly into the Canal
Importation Ditch. This is an existing condition and there will be no added flows or change in
drainage patterns.
Sub-Basin C2
This sub-basin is comprised primarily of roof area, concrete flatwork, and landscaped areas.
Flows from the sub-basin will flow north into curb and gutter along Hobbit Street. Hobbit Street
will convey runoff, along with drainage from Sub-Basin OS3 to Ditch C. Flows will then proceed
to the Canal Importation Ditch.
Sub-Basin D1
Sub-Basins D1 encompasses approximately 5% the total site area. This basin contains Detention
Pond 2, which will collect runoff from Sub-Basins D, F, and the offsite flows from Shields (OS1 &
OS2). Detention Pond 2 will serve as the water quality pond for the remaining basins that are not
treated with LID. An outlet structure will be constructed with a water quality plate and restrictor
plate. The outfall for Pond 2 will discharge into Pond 1. The combination of the detention ponds
will lower the release rate into the Canal Importation Ditch. Emergency overflow from detention
pond 2 will spill into detention pond 1 prior to discharging into the Canal Importation Ditch
Sub-Basin D2
Sub-Basin D2 encompasses approximately 1% the total site area. This sub-basin is comprised
primarily of primarily of landscaped areas. No development is proposed in this area and flows
from the sub-basin will discharge directly into Spring Creek.
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 8 | 21
Sub-Basin D3
These sub-basins are comprised primarily of roof area, concrete flatwork, parking lot, and
landscaped areas. The sub-basins will drain into a common storm sewer via valley pans and curb
and gutter. The storm sewer will collect drainage from all the sub-basins, including Sub-Basins
OS1 and OS2, and discharge into Detention Pond 2. Flows will then proceed to the Canal
Importation Ditch.
Sub-Basin D4-D7
Sub-Basin D2 encompasses approximately 14% the total site area. These sub-basins are
comprised primarily of roof area, concrete flatwork, parking lot, and landscaped areas. The sub-
basins will drain into a common storm sewer via valley pans and curb and gutter. The storm
sewer will collect drainage from all the sub-basins and discharge into Stormtech Chambers 1.
The WQCV will be captured in these chambers during minor flows. Larger flows will bypass the
chambers and discharge directly into Detention Pond 2. Flows will then proceed to the Canal
Importation Ditch. Storm sewer will be sized to convey major storms.
Sub-Basin E1
Sub-basin E1 encompasses approximately 17% the total site area. This sub-basin comprises of
the Spring Creek flood plain. No improvements, except for storm sewer outfalls, are proposed
within this sub-basin
Sub-Basin E2
Sub-basin E2 encompasses approximately 7% the total site area. This sub-basin comprises of the
Canal Importation flood plain. No improvements, except for storm sewer outfalls, are proposed
within this sub-basin
Sub-Basins F1 & F2
Sub-basins F1 and F2 encompasses approximately 1% the total site area. These sub-basins are
comprised primarily of concrete flatwork and landscaped areas. Flows from the sub-basin will
drain into curb and gutter along Shield Street. The curb and gutter will then convey the flows to
the intersection of Shields Street and Stuart Street (also the west entrance of the site), into Sub-
Basin D3, and ultimately Detention Pond 2. Flows will then proceed to the Canal Importation
Ditch.
Sub-Basin OS1 & OS2
Offsite Sub-Basins OS1 and OS2 consists of the west edge of Shields Street that directly impacts
the project site. These sub-basins are comprised primarily of asphalt, concrete flatwork, and a
landscaped parkway. Flows from the sub-basin will drain into curb and gutter along Shield
Street. The curb and gutter will then convey the flows to the intersection of Shields Street and
Stuart Street (also the west entrance of the site), into Sub-Basin D3, and ultimately into Water
Quality Pond D. Half of the flow from these basins will be treated in Detention Pond 2 and will
then proceed to Pond 1 and the Canal Importation Ditch.
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 9 | 21
Sub-Basin OS3
Offsite Sub-Basins OS3 consists of Hobbit Street north of the project site. This sub-basin is
comprised primarily of asphalt and concrete flatwork. Flows from the sub-basin will drain into
curb and gutter along Hobbit Street. The curb and gutter will then convey the flows to Ditch C
and ultimately into the Canal Importation Ditch.
A full-size copy of the Drainage Exhibit can be found in the Map Pocket at the end of this report.
B. SPECIFIC DETAILS
Two detention ponds are proposed with this development and will detain up to the 100-yr storm
event and release at or below the caluclated release rate. A SWMM model was created to deterim
the detention volumes. See Appendix C for more detail. See table 1 for detention summary.
Table 1 – Detention Summary
LID treatment is being provided within Rain Garden 1 and Stormtech Chambers 1 & 2. These
provide mare that the required LID treatement of 75% of the impervious site runoff. Please see
the LID exhibt and calculations in Appendix C.
Detention allowable release rate is based on computed 2-year historic flow for the overall
property. We have added historic flow from Right of Way area in addition to the property. Basins
OS1 and OS2 (Please see Historic Drainage Exhibit), with a combined area of 2.28 acres, will be
taken into Pond 2 and will be detained. Thus, we have added 2-year historic flow from these
basins to the site allowable release. Based on historic flow computations provided in the
appendix, the summation of onsite historic 2-year flow and 2-year flows from Basins OS1 and OS2
is 11.5 cfs. We propose to release slightly below this rate as shown in Table 1, above.
Stormwater facility Standard Operations Procedures (SOP) will be provided by the City of Fort
Collins in the Development Agreement.
Final Design details, and construction documentation shall be provided to the City of Fort Collins
for review prior to Final Development Plan approval.
Pond ID
100-Yr. Detention Vol.
(Ac-Ft) Peak Release (cfs) WQCV (Ac-Ft)
Pond 1 1.99 5.10 n/a
Pond 2 0.89 5.60 0.13
POND SUMMARY TABLE
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT: THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY 10 | 21
V. CONCLUSIONS
A. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS
The drainage design proposed with The Quarry by Watermark complies with the City of Fort
Collins Master Drainage Plan for the Spring Creek and Canal Importation Basins.
The project is adjacent to the Spring Creek and Canal Importation FEMA regulatory floodplains.
However, the development is constructed outside of the floodplains, and buildings are located
18-inches above the base flood elevation. No improvements are proposed within the FEMA
regulated floodplains. All applicable provisions within Chapter 10 of the City Municipal Code
shall be adhered to.
The drainage plan and stormwater management measures proposed with The Quarry by
Watermark project are compliant with all applicable State and Federal regulations governing
stormwater discharge.
B. DRAINAGE CONCEPT
The drainage plan and stormwater management measures proposed with The Quarry by
Watermark project are compliant with all applicable State and Federal regulations governing
stormwater discharge.
The Quarry by Watermark will not impact the Master Drainage Plan recommendations for the
Canal Importation and Spring Creek major drainage basin.
VI. REFERENCES
Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual, City of Fort Collins, Colorado, as adopted by Ordinance No. 159,
2018, and referenced in Section 26-500 of the City of Fort Collins Municipal Code.
Soils Resource Report for Larimer County Area, Colorado, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United
States Department of Agriculture.
Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volumes 1-3, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Wright-
McLaughlin Engineers, Denver, Colorado, Revised April 2008.
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT: THORNBURG HAMILTON FIFTH SUBDIVISION
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS
Runoff
Coefficient1
Percent
Impervious1
0.95 100%
0.95 90%
0.50 40%
0.50 40%
0.20 2%
0.20 2%
Basin ID Basin Area
(sq.ft.)
Basin Area
(acres)
Asphalt,
Concrete (acres)Rooftop (acres) Gravel (acres) Pavers (acres)
Undeveloped:
Greenbelts,
Agriculture
(acres)
Lawns, Clayey
Soil, Flat Slope <
2% (acres)
Percent
Impervious
C2*Cf
Cf = 1.00
C5*Cf
Cf = 1.00
C10*Cf
Cf = 1.00
C100*Cf
Cf = 1.25
H-A1 44,062 1.012 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.012 0.000 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
H-A2 6,773 0.155 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.155 0.000 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
H-B1 110,004 2.525 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.525 0.000 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
H-B2 170,633 3.917 0.015 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.902 0.000 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
H-B3 19,023 0.437 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.417 0.000 6%0.23 0.23 0.23 0.29
H-C1 32,204 0.739 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.739 0.000 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
H-C2 238,190 5.468 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.459 0.000 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
H-D1 7,509 0.172 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.172 0.000 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
H-E1 147,424 3.384 0.283 0.019 0.000 0.000 3.082 0.000 11%0.27 0.27 0.27 0.33
H-E2 60,287 1.384 0.143 0.002 0.000 0.000 1.239 0.000 12%0.28 0.28 0.28 0.35
H-F1 1,947 0.045 0.028 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.017 64%0.67 0.67 0.67 0.84
H-F2 7,695 0.177 0.094 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.082 54%0.60 0.60 0.60 0.75
OS1 21,067 0.484 0.407 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.077 84%0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00
OS2 78,428 1.800 1.706 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.094 95%0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00
Comb
OS1,
OS2 99,495 2.284 2.113 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.171 93%0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00
OS3 20,406 0.468 0.405 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.063 87%0.25 0.25 0.25 0.31
Total-
Onsite 849,927 19.512 0.167 0.000 0.000 0.000 14.209 0.099 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
EXISTING RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CALCULATIONS
Asphalt, Concrete
Rooftop
Gravel
Pavers
The Quarry by Watermark
A.Cvar
March 2, 2021
Project:
Calculations By:
Date:
Character of Surface
Streets, Parking Lots, Roofs, Alleys, and Drives:
Lawns and Landscaping:
Combined Basins
2) Composite Runoff Coefficient adjusted per Table 3.2-3 of the Fort Collins
Stormwater Manual (FCSM).
Lawns, Clayey Soil, Flat Slope < 2%
USDA SOIL TYPE: C
Undeveloped: Greenbelts, Agriculture Composite Runoff Coefficient2
1) Runoff coefficients per Tables 3.2-1 & 3.2 of the FCSM. Percent impervious per Tables 4.1-2 & 4.1-3 of the FCSM.
Page 1 of 1
Project:
Date:
Where:
Length
(ft)
Elev
Up
Elev
Down
Slope
(%)
Ti
2-Yr
(min)
Ti
10-Yr
(min)
Ti
100-Yr
(min)
Length
(ft)
Elev
Up
Elev
Down
Slope
(%)Surface Roughness
(n)
Flow
Area3
(sq.ft.)
WP
3
(ft)
Hydraulic
Radius (ft)
Velocity
(ft/s)
Tt
(min)
Max.
Tc
(min)
Comp.
Tc 2-Yr
(min)
Tc
2-Yr
(min)
Comp.
Tc 10-Yr
(min)
Tc
10-Yr
(min)
Comp.
Tc 100-Yr
(min)
Tc
100-Yr
(min)
h-a1 H-A1 200 15.34 10.61 2.37%17.9 17.9 16.9 159 10.61 7.95 1.67%Swale (4:1)0.025 4.00 8.25 0.48 4.76 0.56 11.99 18.42 11.99 18.42 11.99 17.43 11.99
h-a2 H-A2 45 15.23 14.59 1.42%10.0 10.0 9.5 N/A Swale (4:1)4.00 8.25 N/A N/A 0.00 10.25 10.04 10.04 10.04 10.04 9.48 9.48
h-b1 H-B1 200 14.80 13.63 0.59%28.5 28.5 26.9 278 13.63 11.74 0.68%Swale (8:1)0.025 8.00 16.12 0.50 3.08 1.50 12.66 29.96 12.66 29.96 12.66 28.38 12.66
h-b2 H-B2 148 17.33 16.31 0.69%23.1 23.1 21.8 365 16.31 13.44 0.79%Swale (8:1)0.025 8.00 16.12 0.50 3.31 1.84 12.85 24.94 12.85 24.94 12.85 23.63 12.85
h-b3 H-B3 52 17.33 16.20 2.17%9.0 9.0 8.4 180 16.20 15.20 0.56%Swale (4:1)0.025 4.00 8.25 0.48 2.74 1.09 11.29 10.11 10.11 10.11 10.11 9.50 9.50
h-c1 H-C1 90 17.23 10.63 7.33%8.2 8.2 7.8 175 10.63 10.10 0.30%Swale (4:1)0.025 4.00 8.25 0.48 2.02 1.44 11.47 9.66 9.66 9.66 9.66 9.20 9.20
h-c2 H-C2 60 17.48 16.29 1.98%10.4 10.4 9.8 826 16.29 13.33 0.36%Swale (8:1)0.025 8.00 16.12 0.50 2.24 6.16 14.92 16.52 14.92 16.52 14.92 15.94 14.92
h-d1 H-D1 60 19.31 17.33 3.30%8.8 8.8 8.3 N/A Swale (4:1)4.00 8.25 N/A N/A 0.00 10.33 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.26 8.26
h-e1 H-E1 65 17.28 11.43 9.00%6.0 6.0 5.6 1272 11.43 3.16 0.65%Floodplain 0.045 46.50 23.32 1.99 4.23 5.01 17.43 11.05 11.05 11.05 11.05 10.57 10.57
h-e2 H-E2 40 14.10 7.58 16.30%3.8 3.8 3.5 735 7.58 4.17 0.46%Floodplain 0.035 18.00 13.00 1.38 3.60 3.40 14.31 7.23 7.23 7.23 7.23 6.91 6.91
h-f1 H-F1 22 18.47 17.99 2.18%2.9 2.9 1.8 175 17.99 17.00 0.57%Gutter 0.012 3.61 19.18 0.19 3.07 0.95 11.09 3.84 5.00 3.84 5.00 2.70 5.00
h-f2 H-F2 40 20.24 19.49 1.88%4.8 4.8 3.4 570 19.49 16.79 0.47%Gutter 0.012 3.61 19.18 0.19 2.81 3.38 13.39 8.18 8.18 8.18 8.18 6.74 6.74
os1 OS1 30 22.53 21.47 3.53%1.8 1.8 0.7 420 21.47 16.95 1.08%Gutter 0.012 3.61 19.18 0.19 4.23 1.65 12.50 3.47 5.00 3.47 5.00 2.33 5.00
os2 OS2 26 36.00 34.55 5.58%1.0 1.0 0.5 1738 34.55 16.79 1.02%Gutter 0.012 3.61 19.18 0.19 4.12 7.02 19.80 8.04 8.04 8.04 8.04 7.56 7.56
Comb
OS1,
OS2
Comb
OS1,
OS2
26 36.00 34.55 5.58% 5.9 5.9 5.9 1738 34.55 16.79 1.02% Gutter 0.012 3.61 19.18 0.19 4.12 7.02 19.80 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.94 12.94
os3 OS3 32 20.10 20.05 0.16%16.7 16.7 15.5 615 20.05 12.88 1.17%Gutter 0.012 3.61 19.18 0.19 4.40 2.33 13.59 19.02 13.59 19.02 13.59 17.79 13.59
Total-
Onsite
Total-
Onsite 60 17.48 16.29 1.98% 12.7 12.7 12.7 826 16.29 13.33 0.36% Swale (8:1) 0.025 8.00 16.12 0.50 2.24 6.16 14.92 18.84 14.92 18.84 14.92 18.84 14.92
EXISTING TIME OF CONCENTRATION COMPUTATIONS
Overland Flow, Time of Concentration:
Calculations By:
The Quarry by Watermark
A.Cvar
R = Hydraulic Radius (feet)
S = Longitudinal Slope, feet/feet
Maximum Tc:
Combined Basins
Design
Point Basin
Overland Flow Channelized Flow Time of Concentration
Channelized Flow, Velocity:Channelized Flow, Time of Concentration:
V = Velocity (ft/sec)
n = Roughness Coefficient
March 2, 2021
(Equation 3.3-2 per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual)
𝑇 =1.87 1.1 −𝐶∗𝐶𝑓𝐿
𝑆ଵ ଷൗ
𝑉=1.49
𝑛∗𝑅ଶ/ଷ ∗𝑆(Equation 5-4 per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual)
𝑇𝑐=𝐿
180 + 10
(Equation 3.3-5 per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual)
𝑇𝑡=𝐿
𝑉∗ 60
(Equation 5-5 per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual)
Notes:
1) Add 5000 to all elevations.
2) Per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual, minimum Tc = 5 min.
3) Assume a water depth of 6" and a typical curb and gutter per Larimer County Urban Street Standard Detail 701 for curb and gutter channelized flow. Assume a water depth of 1', fixed side slopes, and a triangular swale section for grass
channelized flow. Assume a water depth of 1', 4:1 side slopes, and a 2' wide valley pan for channelized flow in a valley pan.
Page 1 of 1
Tc2 Tc10 Tc100 C2 C10 C100
I2
(in/hr)
I10
(in/hr)
I100
(in/hr)
Q2
(cfs)
Q10
(cfs)
Q100
(cfs)
h-a1 H-A1 1.012 11.99 11.99 11.99 0.20 0.20 0.25 2.09 3.57 7.29 0.4 0.7 1.8
h-a2 H-A2 0.155 10.04 10.04 9.48 0.20 0.20 0.25 2.21 3.78 8.03 0.1 0.1 0.3
h-b1 H-B1 2.525 12.66 12.66 12.66 0.20 0.20 0.25 2.02 3.45 7.04 1.0 1.7 4.4
h-b2 H-B2 3.917 12.85 12.85 12.85 0.20 0.20 0.25 2.02 3.45 7.04 1.6 2.7 7.0
h-b3 H-B3 0.437 10.11 10.11 9.50 0.23 0.23 0.29 2.21 3.78 8.03 0.2 0.4 1.0
h-c1 H-C1 0.739 9.66 9.66 9.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 2.26 3.86 8.03 0.3 0.6 1.5
h-c2 H-C2 5.468 14.92 14.92 14.92 0.20 0.20 0.25 1.90 3.24 6.62 2.1 3.6 9.1
h-d1 H-D1 0.172 8.75 8.75 8.26 0.20 0.20 0.25 2.35 4.02 8.38 0.1 0.1 0.4
h-e1 H-E1 3.384 11.05 11.05 10.57 0.27 0.27 0.33 2.13 3.63 7.57 1.9 3.3 8.6
h-e2 H-E2 1.384 7.23 7.23 6.91 0.28 0.28 0.35 2.52 4.31 9.06 1.0 1.7 4.4
h-f1 H-F1 0.045 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.67 0.67 0.84 2.85 4.87 9.95 0.1 0.1 0.4
h-f2 H-F2 0.177 8.18 8.18 6.74 0.60 0.60 0.75 2.40 4.10 9.06 0.3 0.4 1.2
os1 OS1 0.484 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.83 0.83 1.00 2.85 4.87 9.95 1.1 2.0 4.8
os2 OS2 1.800 8.04 8.04 7.56 0.91 0.91 1.00 2.40 4.10 8.59 3.9 6.7 15.5
Comb OS1, OS2 Comb OS1, OS2 2.284 12.94 12.94 12.94 0.89 0.89 1.00 2.02 3.45 7.04 4.1 7.0 16.1
os3 OS3 0.468 13.59 13.59 13.59 0.25 0.25 0.31 1.95 3.34 6.82 0.2 0.4 1.0
Total-Onsite Total-Onsite 19.512 14.92 14.92 14.92 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.90 3.24 6.62 7.4 12.6 25.8
EXISTING DIRECT RUNOFF COMPUTATIONS
Intensity Flow
The Quarry by Watermark
A.Cvar
March 2, 2021
Project:
Calculations By:
Date:
Rational Equation: Q = CiA (Equation 6-1 per MHFD)
Design
Point Basin Area
(acres)
Runoff C
Combined Basins
Intensity, I from Fig. 3.4.1 Fort Collins Stormwater Manual
Tc (Min)
Page 1 of 1
Runoff Coefficient 1
Percent
Impervious1
0.95 100%
0.95 90%
0.50 40%
0.85 90%
0.20 2%
0.20 2%
Basin ID Basin Area
(sq.ft.)
Basin Area
(acres)
Asphalt,
Concrete (acres)Rooftop (acres) Gravel (acres)
Residential: High
Density (acres)
Undeveloped:
Greenbelts,
Agriculture
(acres)
Lawns, Clayey Soil,
Flat Slope < 2%
(acres)
Percent
Impervious
C2*Cf
Cf = 1.00
C5*Cf
Cf = 1.00
C10*Cf
Cf = 1.00
C100*Cf
Cf = 1.25
A1 57,578 1.322 0.036 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.277 5%0.23 0.23 0.23 0.28
A2 76,238 1.750 1.220 0.133 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.397 77%0.78 0.78 0.78 0.97
B1 26,648 0.612 0.051 0.152 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.409 32%0.45 0.45 0.45 0.56
B2 23,356 0.536 0.248 0.191 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.098 79%0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00
B3 151,782 3.484 1.890 0.820 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.774 76%0.78 0.78 0.78 0.98
B4 12,548 0.288 0.241 0.022 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.025 91%0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00
B5 20,910 0.480 0.007 0.269 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.205 53%0.63 0.63 0.63 0.79
B6 49,947 1.147 0.666 0.321 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.159 84%0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00
B7 21,377 0.491 0.037 0.241 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.213 53%0.62 0.62 0.62 0.78
C1 4,634 0.106 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.106 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
C2 7,076 0.162 0.007 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.075 50%0.60 0.60 0.60 0.75
D1 42,626 0.979 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.919 8%0.25 0.25 0.25 0.31
D2 9,531 0.219 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.219 2%0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25
D3 9,336 0.214 0.104 0.080 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.030 82%0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00
D4 33,439 0.768 0.600 0.130 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.038 93%0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00
D5 50,568 1.161 0.670 0.300 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.191 81%0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00
D6 2,943 0.068 0.009 0.033 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.026 58%0.67 0.67 0.67 0.83
D7 27,830 0.639 0.067 0.270 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.302 49%0.60 0.60 0.60 0.74
E1 147,424 3.384 0.283 0.019 0.000 0.000 3.082 0.000 11%0.27 0.27 0.27 0.33
E2 60,287 1.384 0.143 0.002 0.000 0.000 1.239 0.000 12%0.28 0.28 0.28 0.35
F1 1,947 0.045 0.028 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.017 64%0.67 0.67 0.67 0.84
F2 7,690 0.177 0.094 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.082 54%0.60 0.60 0.60 0.75
OS1 21,067 0.484 0.407 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.077 84%0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00
OS2 78,428 1.800 1.706 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.094 95%0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00
OS3 38,019 0.873 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.468 87%0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00
Total 845,715 19.415 6.461 3.072 0.000 0.000 4.321 5.562 49%2.25 2.25 2.25 1.00
Lawns and Landscaping:
Combined Basins
2) Composite Runoff Coefficient adjusted per Table 3.2-3 of the Fort Collins
Stormwater Manual (FCSM).
Lawns, Clayey Soil, Flat Slope < 2%
USDA SOIL TYPE: C
Undeveloped: Greenbelts, Agriculture Composite Runoff Coefficient 2
1) Runoff coefficients per Tables 3.2-1 & 3.2 of the FCSM. Percent impervious per Tables 4.1-2 & 4.1-3 of the FCSM.
DEVELOPED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CALCULATIONS
Asphalt, Concrete
Rooftop
Gravel
Residential: High Density
The Quarry by Watermark
M. Ruebel
March 1, 2021
Project:
Calculations By:
Date:
Character of Surface
Streets, Parking Lots, Roofs, Alleys, and Drives:
Page 1 of 11
Project:
Date:
Where: V = Velocity (ft/sec)
n = Roughness Coefficient
R = Hydraulic Radius (feet)
S = Longitudinal Slope, feet/feet
Length
(ft)
Slope
(%)
Ti
2-Yr
(min)
Ti
10-Yr
(min)
Ti
100-Yr
(min)
Length
(ft)
Slope
(%)Surface Roughness
(n)
Flow
Area3
(sq.ft.)
WP
3
(ft)
Hydraulic
Radius (ft)
Velocity
(ft/s)
Tt
(min)
Max.
Tc
(min)
Comp.
Tc 2-Yr
(min)
Tc
2-Yr
(min)
Comp.
Tc 10-Yr
(min)
Tc
10-Yr
(min)
Comp.
Tc 100-Yr
(min)
Tc
100-Yr
(min)
a1 A1 5 5.00%2.1 2.1 2.0 570 1.61%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.88 10.76 13.19 12.90 12.90 12.90 12.90 12.76 12.76
a2 A2 50 2.00%3.4 3.4 1.3 915 0.50%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.49 30.94 15.36 34.30 15.36 34.30 15.36 32.26 15.36
b1 B1 240 2.46%14.0 14.0 11.6 0 N/A Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 N/A N/A 0.00 11.33 13.99 11.33 13.99 11.33 11.59 11.33
b2 B2 60 5.00%2.4 2.4 0.8 87 1.03%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.71 2.05 10.82 4.48 5.00 4.48 5.00 2.90 5.00
b3 B3 130 2.46%5.0 5.0 1.9 610 0.79%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.62 16.49 14.11 21.49 14.11 21.49 14.11 18.40 14.11
b4 B4 40 2.00%2.0 2.0 0.9 162 0.68%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.57 4.71 11.12 6.73 6.73 6.73 6.73 5.65 5.65
b5 B5 50 2.80%4.4 4.4 2.9 51 1.06%Swale (8:1)0.038 8.00 16.12 0.50 0.26 3.32 10.56 7.72 7.72 7.72 7.72 6.24 6.24
b6 B6 96 2.29%3.5 3.5 1.4 227 0.97%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.68 5.53 11.79 9.06 9.06 9.06 9.06 6.92 6.92
b7 B7 40 3.00%3.9 3.9 2.6 291 0.69%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.58 8.42 11.84 12.32 11.84 12.32 11.84 11.04 11.04
c1 C1 13 12.85%2.6 2.6 2.4 190 0.87%Swale (8:1)0.038 8.00 16.12 0.50 0.23 13.60 11.13 16.19 11.13 16.19 11.13 16.05 11.13
c2 C2 40 6.33%3.2 3.2 2.2 0 N/A Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 N/A N/A 0.00 10.22 3.19 5.00 3.19 5.00 2.22 5.00
d1 D1 40 15.03%4.1 4.1 3.8 200 0.51%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.50 6.72 11.33 10.81 10.81 10.81 10.81 10.51 10.51
d2 D2 100 1.42%15.0 15.0 14.1 0 N/A Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 N/A N/A 0.00 10.56 14.97 10.56 14.97 10.56 14.14 10.56
d3 D3 40 2.57%2.2 2.2 0.9 60 0.50%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.23 4.33 10.56 6.54 6.54 6.54 6.54 5.20 5.20
d4 D4 82 1.87%2.6 2.6 1.4 185 0.50%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.23 13.33 11.48 15.89 11.48 15.89 11.48 14.70 11.48
d5 D5 40 1.00%3.2 3.2 1.2 277 0.96%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.32 14.46 11.76 17.70 11.76 17.70 11.76 15.65 11.76
d6 D6 40 2.35%3.9 3.9 2.4 25 0.68%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.57 0.73 10.36 4.59 5.00 4.59 5.00 3.10 5.00
d7 D7 40 3.18%4.1 4.1 2.9 280 0.64%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.56 8.40 11.78 12.46 11.78 12.46 11.78 11.26 11.26
e1 E1 65 9.00%6.0 6.0 5.6 1272 0.65%Floodplain 0.056 46.50 23.32 1.99 0.34 62.65 17.43 68.69 17.43 68.69 17.43 68.21 17.43
e2 E2 40 16.30%3.8 3.8 3.5 735 0.46%Floodplain 0.044 18.00 13.00 1.38 0.29 42.51 14.31 46.34 14.31 46.34 14.31 46.01 14.31
f1 F1 22 2.18%2.9 2.9 1.8 175 0.57%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.25 11.88 11.09 14.77 11.09 14.77 11.09 13.64 11.09
f2 F2 40 1.88%4.8 4.8 3.4 570 0.47%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.22 42.29 13.39 47.09 13.39 47.09 13.39 45.65 13.39
os1 OS1 30 3.53%1.8 1.8 0.7 420 1.08%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.34 20.68 12.50 22.49 12.50 22.49 12.50 21.35 12.50
os2 OS2 26 5.58%1.0 1.0 0.5 1738 1.02%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.33 87.80 19.80 88.82 19.80 88.82 19.80 88.34 19.80
os3 OS3 18 2.06%1.1 1.1 0.6 615 1.38%Gutter 0.015 3.61 19.18 0.19 0.38 26.78 13.52 27.88 13.52 27.88 13.52 27.40 13.52
total Total 40 2.35%-10.2 -10.2 0.9 25 0.68%Valley Pan 0.015 6.00 10.25 0.59 0.57 0.73 10.36 -9.50 5.00 -9.50 5.00 1.62 5.00
March 1, 2021
Combined Basins
Design
Point Basin
Overland Flow Channelized Flow Time of Concentration
DEVELOPED TIME OF CONCENTRATION COMPUTATIONS
Overland Flow, Time of Concentration:
Calculations By:
The Quarry by Watermark
M. Ruebel
Maximum Tc:
Channelized Flow, Velocity:Channelized Flow, Time of Concentration:
(Equation 3.3-2 per Fort Collins
Stormwater Manual)
=1.87 1.1 − ∗
=1.49 ∗
/∗(Equation 5-4 per Fort Collins
Stormwater Manual)
=180 + 10
(Equation 3.3-5 per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual)
=∗ 60
(Equation 5-5 per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual)
Notes:
1) Add 5000 to all elevations.
2) Per Fort Collins Stormwater Manual, minimum Tc = 5 min.
3) Assume a water depth of 6" and a typical curb and gutter per Larimer County
Urban Street Standard Detail 701 for curb and gutter channelized flow. Assume a
water depth of 1', fixed side slopes, and a triangular swale section for grass
Page 2 of 11
Tc2Tc10Tc100C2C10C100I2(in/hr)I10(in/hr)I100(in/hr)Q2(cfs)Q10(cfs)Q100(cfs)a1A11.32212.9012.9012.760.230.230.282.023.457.040.61.02.6a2A21.75015.3615.3615.360.780.780.971.873.196.522.64.411.1b1B10.61211.3311.3311.330.450.450.562.133.637.420.61.02.5b2B20.5365.005.005.000.810.811.002.854.879.951.22.15.3b3B33.48414.1114.1114.110.780.780.981.923.296.715.29.022.9b4B40.2886.736.735.650.880.881.002.604.449.630.71.12.8b5B50.4807.727.726.240.630.630.792.464.219.310.71.33.5b6B61.1479.069.066.920.850.851.002.303.939.062.23.810.4b7B70.49111.8411.8411.040.620.620.782.093.577.420.61.12.8c1C10.10611.1311.1311.130.200.200.252.133.637.420.00.10.2c2C20.1625.005.005.000.600.600.752.854.879.950.30.51.2d1D10.97910.8110.8110.510.250.250.312.173.717.570.50.92.3d2D20.21910.5610.5610.560.200.200.252.173.717.570.10.20.4d3D30.2146.546.545.200.840.841.002.604.449.950.50.82.1d4D40.76811.4811.4811.480.910.911.002.133.637.421.52.55.7d5D51.16111.7611.7611.760.830.831.002.093.577.292.03.48.5d6D60.0685.005.005.000.670.670.832.854.879.950.10.20.6d7D70.63911.7811.7811.260.600.600.742.093.577.420.81.43.5e1E13.38417.4317.4317.430.270.270.331.752.996.101.62.76.9e2E21.38414.3114.3114.310.280.280.351.923.296.710.71.33.2f1F10.04511.0911.0911.090.670.670.842.133.637.420.10.10.3f2F20.17713.3913.3913.390.600.600.751.983.396.920.20.40.9os1OS10.48412.5012.5012.500.830.831.002.023.457.040.81.43.4os2OS21.80019.8019.8019.800.910.911.001.632.785.682.74.610.2os3OS30.87313.5213.5213.520.920.921.001.953.346.821.62.75.9totalTotal19.4155.005.005.002.252.251.002.854.879.95124.5212.7193.2DEVELOPED DIRECT RUNOFF COMPUTATIONSIntensity FlowThe Quarry by WatermarkM. RuebelMarch 1, 2021Project:Calculations By:Date:Rational Equation: Q = CiA (Equation 6-1 per MHFD)DesignPointBasinArea(acres)Runoff CIntensity, I from Fig. 3.4.1 Fort Collins Stormwater ManualTc (Min)Combined BasinsPage 3 of 11
Project Number:Project:
Project Location:
Calculations By:Date:
Sq. Ft. Acres
A1 57,578 1.32 5%n/a n/a 0 3,033
A2 76,238 1.75 77%Stormtech 1 Stormtech 2,448 58,703
B1 26,648 0.61 32% Rain Garden A Rain Garden 6,745 8,513
B2 23,356 0.54 79% Rain Garden A Rain Garden 6,745 18,355
B3 151,782 3.48 76% Rain Garden A Rain Garden 6,745 115,150
B4 12,548 0.29 91% Rain Garden A Rain Garden 6,745 11,386
B5 20,910 0.48 53% Rain Garden A Rain Garden 6,745 11,008
B6 49,947 1.15 84% Rain Garden A Rain Garden 6,745 41,739
B7 21,377 0.49 53% Rain Garden A Rain Garden 6,745 11,236
C1 4,634 0.11 2% n/a n/a 0 93
C2 7,076 0.16 50% n/a n/a 0 3,507
D1 42,626 0.98 8% n/a n/a 0 3,414
D2 9,531 0.22 2% n/a n/a 0 191
D3 9,336 0.21 82% n/a n/a 0 7,693
D4 33,439 0.77 93% n/a n/a 0 31,265
D5 50,568 1.16 81% Stormtech 2 Stormtech 2,616 41,113
D6 2,943 0.07 58% Stormtech 2 Stormtech 2,616 1,708
D7 27,830 0.64 49% Stormtech 2 Stormtech 2,616 13,767
F1 1,947 0.04 64% n/a n/a 0 1,241
F2 7,690 0.18 54% n/a n/a 0 4,174
Total 638,004 13.32 387,288
Project Number:Project:
Project Location:
Calculations By:Date:
Sq. Ft. Acres
Rain Garden A 306,568 7.04 71%
B1-7 Rain Garden 5,621 6,745 217,387
Stormtech 1 76,238 1.75 77%
A2 Stormtech 2,040 2,448 58,703
Stormtech 2 81,341 1.87 70%
D5,6,7 Stormtech 2,180 2,616 56,587
Total 464,147 10.66 11,809 332,677
638,004 ft2
387,288 ft2
54,610 ft2
290,466 ft3
332,677 ft2
85.90%
Total Treated Area
Percent Impervious Treated by LID
A1,C,D1-4,E,F
75% Requried Minium Area to be Treated
LID Site Summary - New Impervious Area
Total Area of Current Development
Total Impervious Area
Total Impervious Area without LID Treatment
Subbasin ID Treatment TypeLID ID Volume per
UD-BMP (ft3)
Area Weighted %
Impervious
1079-001 The Quarry
Fort Collins, Colorado
M. Ruebel 2/28/2021
LID Summary
LID Summary per LID Structure
Impervious
Area (ft2)
Vol. w/20%
Increase per
Fort Collins
Manual (ft3)
LID Summary
AreaBasin ID Treatment TypePercent
Impervious LID ID
The Quarry
2/28/2021
1079-001
Fort Collins, Colorado
M. Ruebel
Total
Impervious
Area (ft2)
Required
Volume (ft3)
LID Summary per Basin
Project Title Date:
Project Number Calcs By:
Client
Basins
0.8
WQCV = Watershed inches of Runoff (inches)90%
a = Runoff Volume Reduction (constant)
i = Total imperviousness Ratio (i = Iwq/100)0.321 in
A =1.75 ac
V = 0.0468 ac-ft
V = Water Quality Design Volume (ac-ft)
WQCV = Water Quality Capture Volume (inches)
A = Watershed Area (acres)
The Quarry March 3, 2021
1791-001 M. Ruebel
Basin A2
2040 cu. ft.
Drain Time
a =
i =
WQCV =
Figure EDB-2 - Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV), 80th Percentile Runoff Event
0.231
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91WQCV (watershed inches)Total Imperviousness Ratio (i = Iwq/100)
Water Quality Capture Volume
6 hr
12 hr
24 hr
40 hr
()iii78.019.10.91aWQCV 23 +-=
()iii78.019.10.91aWQCV 23 +-=
AV*
12
WQCV
=
12 hr
Project Title Date:
Project Number Calcs By:
Client
Basins
0.8
WQCV = Watershed inches of Runoff (inches)90%
a = Runoff Volume Reduction (constant)
i = Total imperviousness Ratio (i = Iwq/100)0.321 in
A =1.87 ac
V = 0.0501 ac-ft
V = Water Quality Design Volume (ac-ft)
WQCV = Water Quality Capture Volume (inches)
A = Watershed Area (acres)
2180 cu. ft.
Drain Time
a =
i =
WQCV =
Figure EDB-2 - Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV), 80th Percentile Runoff Event
The Quarry March 3, 2021
1791-001 M. Ruebel
Basin D5,6,7
0.231
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91WQCV (watershed inches)Total Imperviousness Ratio (i = Iwq/100)
Water Quality Capture Volume
6 hr
12 hr
24 hr
40 hr
()iii78.019.10.91aWQCV 23 +-=
()iii78.019.10.91aWQCV 23 +-=
AV*
12
WQCV
=
12 hr
Vault ID
Total
Required
WQ Volume
(cf)
Flow,
WQ
(cfs)
Chamber
Type
Chamber Release
Ratea
(cfs)
Chamber
Volumeb
(cf)
Installed Camber
w/ Aggregatec
(cf)
Mimimum No.
of Chambersd
Total Release
Ratee
(cfs)
Required
Storage
Volume by
FAA Method
(cf)
Mimimum
No. of
Chambersf
Storage
Provided
within the
Chambersg
(cf)
Total
Installed
System
Volumeh
(cf)
Storm Chamber 1 2040 0.01 SC-740 0.024 45.90 74.90 28 0.66 0 0 1285 2097
Storm Chamber 2 2180 0.02 SC-740 0.024 45.90 74.90 30 0.71 0 0 1377 2247
SC-740 *No Detention provided in chambers
a. Release rate per chamber, limited by flow through geotextile with accumulated sediment.
b. Volume within chamber only, not accounting for void spaces in surrounding aggregate.
c. Volume includes chamber and void spaces (40%) in surrounding aggregate, per chamber unit.
d. Number of chambers required to provide full WQCV within total installed system, including aggregate.
e. Release rate per chamber times number of chambers.
f. Number of chambers required to provide required FAA storage volume stored within the chamber only (no aggregate storage).
g. Volume provided in chambers only (no aggregate storage). This number must meet or exceed the required FAA storage volume.
h. System volume includes total number of chambers, plus surrounding aggregate. This number must meet or exceed the required WQCV.
Chamber Configuration Summary
P:\1791-001\Drainage\LID\1791-001 Chamber Summary
Chamber Dimensions SC-160 SC-310 SC-740 MC-3500 MC-4500
Width (in) 34.0 34.0 51.0 77.0 100.0
Length (in)85.4 85.4 85.4 90.0 52.0
Height (in)16.0 16.0 30.0 45.0 60.0
Floor Area (sf)20.2 20.2 30.2 48.1 36.1
Chamber Volume (cf)6.9 14.7 45.9 109.9 106.5
Chamber/Aggregate Volume (cf)29.3 29.3 74.9 175.0 162.6
Flow Rate* 0.35 gpm/sf
1 cf =7.48052 gal
1 gallon =0.133681 cf
1 GPM = 0.002228 cfs
*Flow rate based on 1/2 of Nov 07 QMAX in Figure 17 of UNH Testing Report
SC-160 SC-310 SC-740 MC-3500 MC-4500
Flow Rate/chamber (cfs)0.015724 0.015724 0.023586 0.037528 0.028159
end caps have a volume of 108.7 cu. ft.
StormTech Chamber Data
Chamber Flow Rate
Chamber Flow Rate Conversion (gpm/sf to cfs)
end caps have a volume of 45.1 cu. ft.
P:\1791-001\Drainage\LID\1791-001 Chamber Summary
UDCABLEF.O.
T
MHTTTSS
S
D
F.O.
D
MH
MM
MH
/ / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / / / / / /STSTSSSSSBBBBBBBB BB
BB B
B BBB BB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
B
BB B BBB
B BBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBXXTRACT B
DETENTION POND 2
d7
d1
a1
b1
b2
b4
b5b6
b7
b3
c1
d2
os2
os3
e1
e2
os1
c2
S SHIELDS ST.HOBBIT ST.WALLENBERG DR
.
SPRI
N
G
C
R
E
E
K CANAL IMPORTATIONMCCOY JOHN H/SHERRY P
1900 S SHIELDS ST
HILL POND CONDOMINIUMS
f2
f1
DETENTION POND 1
d4
d3
d5
d6
1.32 ac.
A1
0.98 ac.
D1
0.22 ac.
D2
0.61 ac.
B1
1.75 ac.
A2
0.54 ac.
B2
0.64 ac.
D7
1.15 ac.
B6
0.48 ac.
B5
0.29 ac.
B4
3.48 ac.
B3
0.11 ac.
C1
0.16 ac.
C20.49 ac.
B7 0.47 ac.
OS3
3.38 ac.
E1
1.38 ac.
E2
0.48 ac.
OS1
1.80 ac.
OS2
0.18 ac.
F2
0.05 ac.
F1
1.16 ac.
D5
0.21 ac.
D3
0.77 ac.
D4
0.07 ac.
D6
TRACT A
RAIN GARDEN A
a2
PROPOSED
STORMTECH
CHAMBERS 2 PROPOSED
STORMTECH
CHAMBERS 1
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INLET
ADESIGN POINT
DRAINAGE BASIN LABEL
DRAINAGE BASIN BOUNDARY
A
LEGEND:
FOR DRAINAGE REVIEW ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN BY:
SCALE:
ISSUED:
THE QUARRY BY
WATERMARK
SHEET NO:
FORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521
GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631
E N G I N E E R N GI
EHTRON R N
970.221.4158
northernengineering.com
P:\1791-001\DWG\DRNG\1791-001_LID.DWGLID EXHIBIT
M. Ruebel
1in=150ft
3.1.2021
( IN FEET )
1 inch = ft.
Feet0150150
150
RAID GARDEN LIMITS
STORMTECH CHAMBERS
LID Summary per LID Structure
LID ID
Area Weighted %
Impervious Subbasin ID Treatment Type Volume per
UD-BMP (ft3)
Vol. w/20%
Increase per Fort
Collins Manual
(ft3)
Impervious
Area (ft2)
Sq. Ft.Acres
Rain Garden A 306,568 7.04 71%B1-7 Rain Garden 5,621 6,745 217,387
Stormtech 1 76,238 1.75 77%A2 Stormtech 2,040 2,448 58,703
Stormtech 2 81,341 1.87 70%D5,6,7 Stormtech 2,180 2,616 56,587
Total 464,147 10.66 11,809 332,677
LID Site Summary - New Impervious Area
Total Area of Current Development 638,004 ft2
Total Impervious Area 387,288 ft2
Total Impervious Area without LID Treatment 54,610 ft2
A1,C,D1-4,E,F
75% Requried Minium Area to be Treated 290,466
Total Treated Area 332,677 ft2
Percent Impervious Treated by LID 85.90%
NORTHERNENGINEERING.COM | 970.221.4158 FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT: THORNBURG HAMILTON FIFTH SUBDIVISION
FORT COLLINS | GREELEY APPENDIX
APPENDIX D
DETENTION POND & SWMM
1S
1S
B2B2B1B1 B1B1B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBBBBB
B
BB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBBB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BB B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBB
B
BB
B
B
B
BBB
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B BB
B
B
B
B
BB
B
B
B
B
UD
SM1
SM2
SM2
SM1
POND 1
POND 2
S. SHIELDS ST.
SWMM EXHIBIT
FORT COLLINS, CO
THE QUARRY BY WATERMARK
E N G I N E E R N GI
EHTRON R N
03.02.21
P:\1791-001\DWG\DRNG\1791-001_SWMM.DWG
Project: 1791-001
By: ATC
Date: 03/01/21
Pond ID
100-Yr. Detention Vol.
(Ac-Ft) Peak Release (cfs)
Pond 1 1.99 5.10
Pond 2 0.89 5.60
POND SUMMARY TABLE
Pond Stage-Storage Curve
Pond: 1
Project: 1791-001
By: ATC
Date: 3/1/21
Stage
(FT)
Contour Area
(SF)
Volume
(CU.FT.)
Volume
(AC-FT)
5006.80 2.47 0.00 0.00
5007.00 540.42 38.63 0.00
5007.20 1682.33 250.38 0.01
5007.40 3357.73 744.83 0.02
5007.60 5668.22 1637.40 0.04
5007.80 8663.48 3060.02 0.07
5008.00 12229.92 5139.14 0.12
5008.20 15000.13 7857.43 0.18
5008.40 17067.89 11062.01 0.25
5008.60 18482.35 14616.10 0.34
5008.80 19183.36 18382.45 0.42
5009.00 19807.07 22281.33 0.51
5009.20 20413.20 26303.20 0.60
5009.40 20996.32 30444.02 0.70
5009.60 21565.35 34700.06 0.80
5009.80 22114.54 39067.93 0.90
5010.00 22630.95 43542.38 1.00
5010.20 23367.81 48142.06 1.11
5010.40 24489.98 52927.40 1.22
5010.60 25657.31 57941.67 1.33
5010.80 26634.08 63170.51 1.45
5011.00 27443.71 68578.09 1.57
5011.20 27992.41 74121.61 1.70
5011.40 28545.43 79775.30 1.83
5011.60 29101.90 85539.94 1.96
5011.80 29662.54 91416.30 2.10
Pond Stage-Storage Curve
Pond: 2
Project: 1791-001
By: ATC
Date: 3/1/21
Stage
(FT)
Contour Area
(SF)
Volume
(CU.FT.)
Volume
(AC-FT)
5011.00 13.48 0.00 0.00
5011.20 266.06 22.63 0.00
5011.40 722.70 117.78 0.00
5011.60 1641.13 347.97 0.01
5011.80 2919.21 797.91 0.02
5012.00 4473.39 1531.67 0.04
5012.20 5816.26 2557.70 0.06
5012.40 6984.68 3836.01 0.09
5012.60 8060.75 5339.27 0.12
5012.80 9055.19 7049.90 0.16
5013.00 10006.64 8955.29 0.21
5013.20 10893.75 11044.70 0.25
5013.40 11658.44 13299.48 0.31
5013.60 12380.18 15702.99 0.36
5013.80 13121.41 18252.79 0.42
5014.00 13883.39 20952.91 0.48
5014.20 14668.97 23807.78 0.55
5014.40 15484.34 26822.75 0.62
5014.60 16402.04 30010.94 0.69
5014.80 17338.60 33384.57 0.77
5015.00 18403.47 36958.20 0.85
5015.20 20897.84 40885.74 0.94
5015.40 23715.17 45344.08 1.04