The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBURGER KING AT RIVERSIDE PUD - PRELIMINARY - 37-89 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - APPLICATIONPLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FORM City of Fort Collins Project Name: Burger King at Riverside Land Use Information: Project Number: 2-9012 Project Location or Street Address: Today's Date: 7-5-89 726 South Lemav Avenue Gross Acreage/Sq. Footage: Existing Zoning: I G Proposed Use Fast Food Restaurant Total Number of Dwelling Units N.A. Total Commercial Floor Area: 2720 SQ . FT. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owners Name: B & M Roofing Applicants Name:Edward G. Zdenek, Architect Contact Person: Ed Zdenek Address: 726 South Lemay Address: 223 Linden St. , Suite 105 Address: 223 Linden St., Suite 105 Telephone: 482-5964 Telephone: 493-4105 Telephone: 493-4105 CONTAC11': NOR —MAR Development (303)449-1600 is TYPE OF REQUEST: Please indicate type of application submitted by checking the box preceding appropriate request(s). Combined requests, except for Final PUD and Final Subdivision, require the combined individual fees. No application will be processed until all required information is provided. Additional handouts are available explaining information requirements for each of the following review processes. Annexation with Initial Zoning Fee: $50.00 + $10,00 per sheet of annexation plat "+ $3.00* per sheet of annexation petition Requested Zone Rezoning Requested Zone Fee: $50.00 + $3.00* per sheet of rezoning petition Planned Unit Development - Master Plan Fee: $60.00 Planned Unit Development - Preliminary Plan XX Fee: $50,00 Planned Unit Development - Final Plan (including final subdivision) Fee: $110.00 + $10.00 per sheet of subdivision plat PUD Administrative Change Fee: $5.00 Minor Subdivision Fee: $150,00 Preliminary Subdivision Fee: $50.00 Final Subdivision - 1 to 4 lots Fee: $75.00 Final Subdivision - more than 4 lots Fee: $110.00 + $10.00 per sheet of plat Multiple -Family Use Requests in the R-M and R-H Zoning District Fee: $85.00 Non -Residential Use Requests in the R-H Zoning District Fee: $85.00 Non-Gon#arming Use Requests Fee: $tit# Imo" Group Home Review Fee: $85.00 IL/IP Site Plan Review Fee: $110.00 Other Special Site Plan Review Fee:$100.00 Vacation of ROW or Easement Fee: $3.00* per sheet of filing document Street Name Change Fee: $3.00* per Sheet of filing document 5/1987 *Please make check Davable to Larimer Countv Clerk and Recorder. PUD ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE Description of the change and reason(s) for the request: Planning Department: Action: Date: By: Building Inspection: Action: Date: By: Engineering: Action: Date By: CERTIFICATION I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Name: Edward G. Zdenek, Architect Address: 223 Linden Street, Suite 105 Fort Collins, CO 80524 Telephone: 493-4105 ��an PLANNING OBJECTIVES Burger King at Riverside P.U.D. Preliminary P.U.D. July 5, 1989 The Burger King at Riverside PUD submission is the culmination of lengthy nego- tiations with the City of Fort Collins. While statt determined the land use to be appropriate (a use by right in the existing IG zone) several site design issues were identitied that needed to be addressed in the site planning. Because of the critical location of the site, and the ditticulty of coordinating the project with existing development, it was determined to pursue a PUD appro- val rather than a site plan approval based on a use by right. The issues iden- titied as critical to the proper development of the site include: Trattic access to site Existing trattic tunctions at the intersection of Riverside and Lemay Internal circulation for the drive-thru Coordinated access and internal circulation with adjacent property owners Adequate project identification Trattic access to the site has been addressed in a trattic studv prepared by Matt Delich for this submission. It was determined that the City currently requires an additional through lane for trattic movement east on Riverside, and that the single lets turn lane on Lemay Avenue is working at maximum capacity presently and that an additional lett turn bay will be required in the near tuture. While neither of these improvements are caused by the redevelopment of the site, we have addressed their solutions in the PUD plan. Internal circulation for the drive-thru tunction was designed to internalize the trattic tlow and to minimize the impact on the entrances to Lemay and Riverside. Adjacent property owners have been contacted, and design solutions coordinated, providing for improved access for all developments. The building east of our property is currently being used as a print shop in conjunction with Robinson Press. The three access points currently existing on Riverside have been coor- dinated into one, and a new parking area added. The combined access to Riverside has been continued to provide access to the auto -service development south of the site. The resulting design should be a signiticantly improved internal circulation at the intersection. Project identitication on the site is ditticult because of adjacent development setbacks (titteen (15) teet to the building south of the site and one (1) toot to development east of us) the City has street lights, signal lights, and railway crossing gates all blocking visual access to the site. For this reason we have requested a pole sign be included in the development as well as a monu- ment sign. RIVERSIDE/submit �il r Landscaping is critical to this site it we are to transtorm an existing eyesore into a site that will be pleasing to the people using the tacility as well as passing trattic. The existing site has no landscape improvements, the tacility east of our site has little or no landscaped improvements and the project south of ours was developed as a use by right, providing limited landscape improve- ments. We have included a street tree planting solution with irrigated turt incorporating the latest City standards for landscape adjacent to arterial streets. Drive-thru tacilities and service areas have been screened trom view with evergreen hedge and tree treatments. Evergreen and deciduous shrubs have been liberally used to assure color throughout the growing season. Berms have been used to screen parking trom public view. Internal trees have been selected to provide varied color and shade appropriate to their location. Peak shitt employment will be tourteen (14). The internal solution includes outdoo►- dining and "sott play" areas. The energy consumption of the tacility is minimized by increasing the insulation ratings of the tacility over the City minimum standards. The applicable land use policies that are met by the project include: 3a. Promote maximum utilization of land within the city 3b. Alternative transportation modes 14. Urban development standards 20. Understanding interrelationships 22. Contiguous development 24. Phased utilities 25. Directed growth 26. Available existing services RIVERSIDEI/submit KaR VICINITY MAP d SIGN 2 ■ SIGN 1 SIGN ELEVATIONS • i� Brxr»RrK: Brtl000 TRASH ENCLOSURE waouGHT lnox STUCCO TO MATCH eUMOING FENCE DETAIL •II•'• •'-^' LANDSCAPE LEGEND ' SITE STATISTICS — aa+ xah%'si.i: r�.`I ®IRvuxu / (�jQ��/ z•• G Nu. » . c Q 00 PRINT SHOP LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTES ... - • - •••—•••M •� ••••. - a •--% LANDSCAPENOTES i i OWNER'S CERTIFICATION ..j •.TM.wlw arai� :iu ii:.��i:..+°.«. <.:il« w°•�w�ti M<M! IM wlllw• W .••sT<,,.w s•t < t. a s•IB slu rlu. Islp»•1 ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION t.H IS TB U.'UT rIMT a K Y, a 11 M 611J. IK I%I �TIF'A—,, wrorl i B a .ua. a IM s.1. ,.wtn M c�smN. I. c...$. 1.... tl-t}III, Mt M um MMB. M a LIB M11. LEGEND Beasnuna M. „. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD CERTIFICATION .rn..•• y w rl».q w twM B•«1 N w < """ <'« att •r r«t cants. to«.•.. « u,• a �x<Ilar sRr wr•t«t • ,s M «<. •r• / 1— — - — — — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- LEMAY AVENUE lFAST FOOD PRELIMINARY SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN BURGER KING at RIVERSIDE edward g. .x. 8-..-9 zdenek . OCT N mr�oer B. s HtAH tLtVA I IUN SCALE: 1/41'-0- • srxnlEtic stucco MAIN ENTRANCE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4' 1'-0' DRIVE-THRU ELEVATION SCALE: I/t 1'-0• FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1W 1'-0• C[LTIIIIl'I PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS BURGER KING at RIVERSIDE IIUD Edward g. .. • s� zdenek :-sale rrcn�i el is Dame+ A= Ll ALL DEVELOPMENT; NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion applicable? WIII the criterlon be satisfied? If no, please explain m.�'`,�'�°°0 Yes No NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY 1 Social Compatability X X 2 Neighborhood Character X X 3 Land Use Conflicts X 4 Adverse Traffic Impact PLANS AND POLICIES 5 Comprehensive Plan PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 6 Street Capacity X X 7 Utility Capacity X X 8 Design Standards X X' 9 Emergency Access 10 Security Lighting 11 Water Hazards RESOURCE PROTECTION 12 Soils & Slope Hazard X 13 Significant Vegetation X 14 Wildlife Habitat 15 Historical Landmark 16 Mineral Deposit 17 Eco-Sensitive Areas 18 Agricultural Lands X ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 19 Air Quality X X 20 Water Quality X X 21 Noise X 22. Glare & Heat 23 Vibrations 24 Exterior Lighting X 25 Sewoges & Wastes SITE DESIGN 26 Community Organization X X 27 Site Organization X X 28 Natural Features 29 Energy Conservation 30 Shadows 31 Solar Access 32 Privacy 33 Open Space Arrangement 34 Building Height X 35 Vehicular Movement X X 36 Vehicular Design X 37 Parking 38 Active Recreational Areas 39 Private Outdoor Areas 40 Pedestrian Convenience 41 Pedestrian Conflicts 42 Landscaping/Open Areas 43 Landscaping/Buildings 44 Landscaping/Screening 45 Public Access 46 Signs —12— of 4f ACTIVITY: Business Service Uses DEFINITION: Those activities which are predominantly retail, office, and service uses which would not qualify as or be a part of a neighborhood or commu- nity/regional shopping center. Uses include: retail shops; offices; per- sonal service shops; financial institutions; hotels/motels; medical clin- ics; health clubs; membership clubs; standard and fast-food restaurants; hospitals; mortuaries; indoor theatres; retail laundry and dry cleaning outlets; limited indoor recreation uses; small animal veterinary clinics; printing and newspaper offices; and, other uses which are of the same gen- eral character. C RTERIA Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the develop- ment plan. Yes No 1. Does the project gain its primary vehicular access from a street other ❑ than South College Avenue? El 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST 50% OF THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED ❑ ❑ ON "POINT CHART E" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA? a. Is the activity contiguous to an existing transit route (not appli- cable for uses of less than 25,000 square feet GLA or with less than 25 employees) or located in the Central Business District? b. Is the project located outside of the "South College Avenue Corri- dor?" c. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a part of a neighbor- hood or community/regional shopping center, an office or industrial park, located in the Central Business District or in the case of a single user, employ or will employ a total of more than 100 full- time employees during a single 8-hour shift? d. Is the project on at least two acres of land or located in the Cen- tral Business District? r�nr�tini i� - -22- • ;0 49 r— continued �— r e. Does the project contain two or more significant uses (such as retail, office, residential, hotel/motel, and recreation)? f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off -site parking areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces? g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage, through the application of alternative energy systems, use of existing build- ings, and through committed energy conservation measures beyond that normally required by City Code? h. Is the project located with at least 1/6th of its property boundary contiguous to existing urban development? i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event occurred, which has special public value because of notable archi- tecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill the following criteria. i. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation; ii. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping with the character of the building or place. Imitation of period styles should be avoided; and iii. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will lead to its continuance, conservation and improvement in an appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the neighborhood. -23- so GP BUSINESS SERVICE USES POINT CHART E For All Critera Applicable Criteria Only I II III N Circle Criterion Is The Crtterion Applicable The Correct Score Multiplier Points Earned Maximum Applicable Points Yes No Yes Wd' No I 1x11 a. Transit route X 2 0 2 0 0 b. S. College corridor X X 2 0 4 8 8 c. Part of center ? X X 2 0 3 6 b d. Two acres or more X X 2, 0 3 0 6 e. Mixed -use X X 2 0 3 0 6 f. Joint parking 1 0 3 0 0 g. Energy conservation X 1 2 4 0 8 h. Contiguity X X 2 0 5 10 10 i. Historic preservation 112 0 2 0 0 j. 112 0 k. 1 2 0 I. 11120 ' VAI — Very Well Done Totals 24 44 V VI yg Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points VM =V11 55% V1I -24-