HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVERBEND STABLES PUD - PRELIMINARY - 39-89 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - APPLICATION(lid .
i
City of Fort Collins
Project Name: i-i\' &EIELC
Project Number:
Project Location or Street Address: L-.kr t�jI4_ra
Today's Date: 7—�2 -�W
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Owners Name: �t)1ai4 0 �x , � lF
Address
Telephone
0
A
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FORM
Land Use Information:
(o,13
Gross Acreage/Sq. Footage:
Existing Zoning: �—
Proposed Use:
Total Number of Dwelling Units:
Total Commercial Floor Area:
Applicants Name: J/_2 1 W EW4
Address: , L hT
Telephone: NTL
� /3 -
TYPE OF REQUEST:
Contact Person: Jn44W V,6WFrr
Address: Z)rno LET
Telephone:
-7
Please indicate type of application submitted by checking the box preceding appropriate request(s). Combined requests, except for Final
PUD and Final Subdivision, require the combined individual fees. No application will be processed until all required information is provided.
Additional handouts are available explaining information requirements for each of the following review processes.
Annexation with Initial Zoning
Fee: $50.00 + $10.00 per sheet of annexation plat + $3.00* per sheet
of annexation petition Requested Zone
Rezoning Requested Zone
Fee: $50.00 + $3.00* per sheet of rezoning petition
Planned Unit Development - Master Plan
Fee: $60,00
Planned Unit Development - Preliminary Plan
Fee: $50.00
Planned Unit Development- Final Plan (including final subdivision)
Fee: $110.00 + $10.00 per sheet of subdivision plat
PUD Administrative Change
Fee: $5.00
Minor Subdivision
Fee: $150,00
Preliminary Subdivision
Fee $50.00
Final Subdivision - 1 to 4 lots
Fee: $75.00
Final Subdivision - more than 4 lots
Fee: $110.00 -+ $10.00 per sheet of plat
Multiple -Family Use Requests in the R-M and R-H Zoning District
Fee: $85.00
Non -Residential Use Requests in the R-H Zoning District
Fee: $85.00
Non -Conforming Use Requests
Fee: $110.00
Group Home Review
Fee: $85.00
IL/IP Site Plan Review
Fee: $110.00
Other Special Site Plan Review
Fee: $100.00
Vacation of ROW or Easement ^
Fee: $3.00* per sheet of filing document
Street Name Change
Fee- $3.00* per sheet of filing document
5/1987 *Please make check payable to Larimer Countv Clerk and Recorder.
PUD ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE
Description of the change and reason(s) for the request:
Planning Department:
Action:
Date:
By:
Building Inspection:
Action:
Date:
By:
Engineering:
Action:
Date:
By:
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that
in filing the ap'plication I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property without whose consent the requested
action cannot lawfully be accomplished:-, 1 Z"
Name:
Address: 7-`� ✓U'� �fr�a'= l -! i`f�/� t /�" l�L�i � (� /f�—�� ��
Telephone:
��=a
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
RIVERBEND STABLES
A tract of land situate in the North 1/2 of Section 17, Township 7 North,
Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., County of Larimer, State of Colorado, which
considering the North line of said Section 17 as bearing South 88043'30", and
with all bearings contained herein, relative thereto is contained within the
boundary line which begins at a point which bears South 65021'36" East
1,047.91 feet and again South 00024'30" West 400.00 feet from the Northwest
corner of said Section 17; thence South 00024'30" West 51.16 feet; thence
North 85051' East 250.00 feet; thence South 00024'30" West 250.00 feet; thence
South 36016'30" East 368.87 feet; thence South 89009'30" East 328.91 feet;
thence North 00024'30" East 423.10 feet; thence South 85051' West 230.00 feet;
thence North 00024'30" East 170.00 feet; thence South 85051' West 171.00 feet;
thence North 00024'30" East 50.16 feet; thence South 85051' West 400 feet to
the point of beginning.
8904
7-5-89
John Barnett, ASLA
Landscape Architect/Planner
■
2500 Dorset Court
Fort Collins, CO 80526
3031493-7023
July 6, 1989
Fort Collins Planning Office
300 LaPorte Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Re: Riverbend Stables Preliminary PUD
Dear Friend:
We are submitting the preliminary PUD application for Riverbend Stables
PUD.
Riverbend Stables is proposed to be a rental stable for up to 50 horses
with an open arena, three lunges, and appropriate holding corrals and facili-
ties for storage of feed, hay, and bedding. Liquid waste will be handled by
routing it through an artificial wetland along the west side of the property.
Landscaping will include wildlife planting of this wetland and adjacent City
property to the west.
Located immediately north of the City -owned Riverbend Ponds Open Space
one-half block south of Highway 14, the site has some unique constraints. The
site is accessed via county roads with no possibility of city street access
until the construction of the Timberline Road Extension during the late 1990s.
The proposed alignment of Timberline Road will destroy the stables, making
them a temporary land use and paving the way for future development opportuni-
ties. The specific location of the stable structure is currently the only
area outside the floodway.
The temporary nature of the land use and location of the site form the
basis for the only variances being requested. We are requesting two variances:
1) that the adjacent street not be paved to a 36-foot width;
2) that vehicular circulation and parking areas on site be gravel rather
than be paved or have curb and gutter.
This variance will relieve the hardships of the temporary nature of the
use and access from county roads. It will also reduce acquisition and con-
struction costs when Timberline Road is constructed.
We look forward to working with City staff and the Fort Collins Planning
and Zoning Board during the approval process. If any additional information
is necessary, please let me know.
Sincerely,
r�
John L. Barnett, ASLA
Enclosure
JLB/ps
•
•
July 5, 1989
Project No: 1157-1-89
City of Fort Collins Planning Department S H E A R
300 Laporte Ave. ENGINEERING
CORPORATION
Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524
Re: Riverbend Stables Preliminary Submittal; Ft. Collins, Colorado.
Dear Planning Department,
This letter serves to summarize preliminary drainage and floodplain
issues, and issues concerning wetland mitigation of nitrate contamination
from livestock wastes for Riverbend Stables.
Our understanding is that a new floodplain study for the Poudre River has
been prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, this study has
not yet been adopted by Larimer County and has not been acquired by this
firm. Therefore, information from the Floodplain Study for the Poudre
River currently being utilized by Larimer County, was referred to, and
relied upon, for all preliminary floodplain information. The study was
prepared by the Corps of Engineers and dated October, 1973. The nearest
floodplain data reference section from the study indicates that the 100
year floodplain elevation across the project site is at or near 4912.1.
Final grades of structures will be determined at the final design stage.
Generally, final grades of structures will be 18" above the anticipated
100 year flood elevation as determined from the floodplain study for the
Paudre River in effect with Larimer County and the City of Fort Collins at
the time of final design and submittal for Riverbend Stables.
Because of the proposed land use, State of Colorado Water Quality
regulations concerning runoff from facilities connected with livestock use
have been considered. These regulations require the retention of a 25 year
storm. The design of the retention facility would generally follow the
State guidelines contained in the document titled "Guidelines for design
of feedlot containment facilities" adopted by the State May 3, 1978.
Approximately 1 acre of the site has been reserved for retention
requirements. Preliminary calculations indicate that 1 acre will be
adequate to provide the necessary retention volumes, as well as meet
sedimentation area and freeboard requirements.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is currently in the process of
developing nation wide storm water quality criteria to reduce the impact
of pollutants an receiving waters. Part of these criteria is the
development of wetlands for extraction of nitrates, phosphates, organics
and heavy metals. Wetlands are mentioned as the "best management"
practice. Nitrates from livestock wastes make the wetlands concept
attractive for this site. The wetlands concept, though on a small scale in
this particular instance, seems to have been received well by all parties
associated with this project thus far. Wetlands design will be
incorporated in the final design of the retention facility. The City of
Fort Collins has expressed interest in participating in a wetlands area in
connection with this project. We anticipate that future negotiations with
the City concerning the extent of wetlands development, on and adjacent to
the Riverbend Stables property, will be considered and possibly,
4431 Hollyhock, Ft. Collins, CO 80526 (303) 226.5334
PACE 2 • •
Project No: 1157-1-89
Riverbend Stables
incorporated into the final submittal package and final design for
Riverbend Stables. We anticipate that the wetlands to be provided will
consist of a two level or benched system with a sedimentation basin
upstream. The benched concept allows for the establishment of plants and
also provide habitat for mosquito predator species. Further detail on the
design of wetlands for the mitigation of nitrate contamination will be
provided at the final design stage. We anticipate the involvement and
input from the City of Fort Collins Department of Natural Resources during
final design of the wetlands, especially related to wetland concepts and
experience with wetlands performance.
Should there be any
issues, or wetlands
office of John Barnett,
Sinc
questions concerning floodplain or storm drainage
issues, please call our office at 226-5334 or the
ASLA at 453-7023.
Shear Engineering Corporation
Brian W. Shear, P.E.
cc: John Barnett
I IS7-i- 8,-)
2NE ZBFi-yU ST4Bv�,
e
�d
C1
J
I ?
J
Ci d
IIS'1-1-P,'
• r"vE28EuD STn sl
7VU-4 , Ie)P,a
13
111
0
0
-4�)
0
��o r� �nLLV`1�lvy�
No Text
ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART
ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
CRITERION
vV.11 thg �r,teripr
IS t^e C"'en0� OPPIc OCI9� Ce SC!i Sf,64o
If no, please explain
`tea 1
Q,O,F �� � I Yes No
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY
1. Social ComputabilityIx
Ix
2. Neighborhood Character
3. Land Use Conflicts
4. Adverse Traffic Impact
PLANS AND POLICIES
5. Comprehensive Plan
PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY
6. Street Capacity
7. Utility Capacity
8. Design Standards
9. Emergency Access
10. Security Lighting
11. Water Hazards
RESOURCE PROTECTION
12 Soils & Slooe Hazard
13. Significant Vegetation
14. Wildlife Habitat
%
I
15. Historical Landmark
16. Mineral Deposit
17. Eco-Sensitive Areas
18. Agricultural Lands
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
19. Air Quality
20, Water Quality
21. Noise
22. Glare & Heat
23. Vibrations
24. Exterior Lighting
25. Sewages & Wastes
SITE DESIGN
26. Community Organization
27. Site Organization
28, Natural Features
29. Energy Conservation
30. Shadows
31. Solar Access
32. Privacy
33. Open Space Arrangement
34. Building Height
35. Vehicular Movement
36. Vehicular Design
37 Parking
38. Active Recreational Areas
39. Private Outdoor Areas
40. Pedestrian Convenience
41. Pedestrian Conflicts
42. Landscaping/Open Areas
43, Landscaping/Buildings
ie
44. Landscaping/Screening
45. Public Access
46. Signs
ACTIVITY: Auto- Related and
Roadside Commercia
DEFINFION
Those retail and wholesale commercial activities which are generally con-
sidered and typically found along highways and arterial streets. Uses
include: free standing department stores; auction rooms; automobile service
stations, repair facilities, car washes; boat, car, trailer, motorcycle
showrooms, sales and repair; fuel and ice sales; greenhouses and nurseries;
warehouses and storage; repair or rental of any article; exterminating
shops; drive-in restaurants; adult book stores; eating places with adult
amusement or entertainment; adult photo studios; adult theatres; any uses
intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment; and, other uses which
are of the same general character.
CRITERIAEach of the following applicable criteria must be
answered "yes" and implemented within the develop-
ment plan.
YC-3 ,No DNA
1. Does the project gain its primary ❑
vehicular access from a street other
than South College Avenue?
2. Are all repair, painting and body work ❑ Elactivities, including storage of refuse
and vehicular parts, planned to take
place within an enclosed structure?
3. If the project contains any uses intended 11110
to provide adult amusement or entertainment,
does it meet the following requirements:
a. Is the use established, operated or maintained no less than 500
feet from a residential neighborhood, church and/or school meeting
all the requirements of the compulsory education laws of the State
of Colorado?
b. Is the use established, operated or maintained no less than 1,000
feet from another similar use?
��i IIF11111 I E 91214I
u� u n \—A
—19—
•
•
AUTO -RELATED AND
ROADSIDE COMMERCIAL
POINT CHART D
For All Critera
Applicable Criteria Only
Criterion
Is The
Criterion
Applicabie
Yes No
I II III N
Circle
The
Correct
Score
Yes VW No
Multiplier
Points
Earned
1x11
Maximum
Applicable
Points
a. Notattwoarterials
X
X
2
1 0
2
4
b. Part of planned center
X
X
2
0
3
(j
6
c. On non -arterial
X
X
210
4
8
d. Two acres or more
X
X
2
0
3
6
e. Mixed -use
X
X
2
0
3
d
6
f. Joint parking
1
210
3
g. Energy conservation
X
1
2
0
4
8
h. Contiguity
X
X
2
0
5
IL?
10
i. Historic preservation
J)K
1
2
0
2
1
1
2
0
k.
5112001
I
1112101
' VW — Very Well Done Totals Z8 AA
V VI
Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points VNI = VII ,�B %
—21—
ACTIVITY Business Service Uses
DEFINF ON;
E
Those activities which are predominantly retail, office, and service uses
which would not qualify as or be a part of a neighborhood or commu-
nity/regional shopping center. Uses include: retail shops; offices; per-
sonal service shops; financial institutions; hotels/motels; medical clin-
ics; health clubs; membership clubs; standard and fast-food restaurants;
hospitals; mortuaries; indoor theatres; retail laundry and dry cleaning
outlets; limited indoor recreation uses; small animal veterinary clinics;
printing and newspaper offices; and, other uses which are of the same gen-
eral character.
CRTERIAEach of the following applicable criteria must be
answered "yes" and implemented within the develop-
ment plan.
Yes No
1. Does the project gain its primary
vehicular access from a street other
than South College Avenue?
2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST 50%
OF THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED ❑
ON "POINT CHART E" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA?
a. Is the activity contiguous to an existing transit route (not appli-
cable for uses of less than 25,000 square feet GLA or with less
than 25 employees) or located in the Central Business District?
b. Is the project located outside of the "South College Avenue Corri-
dor?"
c. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a part of a neighbor-
hood or community/regional shopping center, an office or industrial
park, located in the Central Business District or in the case of a
single user, employ or will employ a total of more than 100 full-
time employees during a single 8-hour shift?
d. Is the project on at least two acres of land or located in the Cen-
tral Business District?
-22-
r- coritr►_ ed �..R
e. Does the project contain two or more significant uses (such as
retail, office, residential, hotel/motel, and recreation)?
f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site
parking areas and adjacent existing or future off -site parking
areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces?
g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage, through the
application of alternative energy systems, use of existing build-
ings, and through committed energy conservation measures beyond
that normally required by City Code?
h. Is the project located with at least 1/6th of its property boundary
contiguous to existing urban development?
i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event
occurred, which has special public value because of notable archi-
tecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill
the following criteria.
i. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation;
ii. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping
with the character of the building or place. Imitation of
period styles should be avoided; and
iii. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will
lead to its continuance, conservation and improvement in an
appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the
neighborhood.
-23-
0
•
BUSINESS
SERVICE USES
POINT CHART E
For All Critera
Applicable Criteria Only
Criterion
Isfie
Criterion
Apolicable
Yes No
l u lu r�
Circle
The
Correct
Score
Yes VW No
Muffiplier
Points
Earned
1x11
Maximum
Applicable
Points
a. Transit route
I><
X
2
0
2
b. S. College corridor
X
X
2
0
4
8
c. Part of center
X
X
2
0
3
Q
6
d. Two acres or more
X
X
2
0
3
6
e. Mixed -use
X
X
2
C
3
6
f. Joint parking
1
2
0
3
O
a
g. Energy conservation
X
1
2
0
4
d
8
h. Contiguity
X
X
2
0
5
10
10
i. Historic preservation
1
2
0
2
j,
1
2
0
k,
1
2
0
I.
1
2
0
' VW — Very Well Done Totals 4-et A-q
V VI
Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points VM =V11 5;5 %
VII
—24—