Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 20-87A - CORRESPONDENCE - LEGAL COMMUNICATION0 CITY OF FORT COLLINS M E M O R A N D U M TO: James M. Davis, Director Development Se ces FROM: W. Paul Eckman, Assistant City Attorney T DATE: October 23, 1987 RE: Location and Construction of Public Schools You have inquired of me as to the legal rights and obliga- tions of the School District with respect to its decisions regarding the location and construction of public schools. School districts are afforded considerable latitude by the Colo- rado Revised Statutes in the selection of locations, and in the construction of school buildings. Two statutes come particularly to mind, those being Section 22-32-124(1), C.R.S. and Section 31,-23-209, C.R.S. According to the rules of statutory construction, if there are two statutes dealing with the same subject matter, and one statute is general while the other is specific, as far as is possible, the statutes are to be interpreted in such a manner as to give effect to both. In the event there is an irreconcilable conflict, the specific statute controls over the general one. Section 22-32-124, C.R.S. is a specific statute dealing with the construction and location of public schools, while Section 31-23-209, C.R.S. is a general statute dealing with the location of public buildings and how a school board might overrule a dis- approval by a planning commission. (The planning commission has been established in Fort Collins as the Planning and zoning Board,) Section 31-23-209, C.R.S. provides that no public building shall. be constructed or authorized in a city until the location, character and extent thereof has been submitted for approval by a planning commission. In the case of a school district, the planning commission's disapproval may be overruled by two-thirds vote of the membership of the school board. Section 22-32-124(1), C.R.S. requires that, prior to the acquisition of land or any contracting for the purchase of land, 300 Laporte Av. a P.O. Box 580 a Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 9 (303) 221-6515 9 James M. Davis October 22, 1987 Page 2 the school board shall consult with and advise in writing the planning commission, in order that the proposed site shall con- form to the adopted plan of a city insofar as is feasible. Pre- sumably, the purpose of the aforesaid provision is to help to insure that a school district does:not purchase property which would be infeasible for development for school purposes. Prior to construction of any structure or building, a school board must submit a site development plan for review and comment by the planning commission. The planning commission may request a public hearing before the school board relating to the proposed site location or site development plan. Finally, the statute further provides that: Nothing in this subsection (1) shall be construed to limit the authority of a board of education to - finally determine the location of public schools within the district and erect necessary buildings and structures. In reading the two statutes together, with a view toward reconciliation of their provisions so that both statutes may be given effect, it is my opinion that the Planning and Zoning Board is. afforded an opportunity to review and comment upon the site development plan prior to construction of any structure thereon. Since there is no ultimate limitation on the authority of the Board of Education to finally determine the location and con- struction of school buildings, I believe that the "final determi- nation" of the School Board may be made, in accordance with Sec- tion 31-23-209, C.R.S. by a two-thirds vote of the board member- ship if the Planning and Zoning Board should, after its review of the site development plan, determine to disapprove the construc- tion of the school building. In summary, if the School Board is determined to construct a school at a particular location, there is little that the City can do to prohibit such construction; but the City is entitled to review and comment upon the proposal, it is entitled to a public hearing thereon, and, in the event that it should disapprove the construction, the School Board must overrule the Planning and Zoning Board by a vote of not less than two-thirds of its member- ship. WPE:kkg