The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTAFT CANYON SECOND ANNEXATION & ZONING - 22-87, A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES• PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MAY 18, 1987 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was calleA t.o order. at 6:33 p.m. in Council Chambers of New City Hall, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members present were Dave Edwards, Sanford Kern, Laurie O'Dell, Don Crews, Tim Dow, Sharon Brown, Linda Lang (arriving at 6:37 p.m.), and Bernie Strom. Board members who attended the work session on May 15, 1987, included Don Crews, Laurie O'Dell, Bernie Strom, and Dave Edwards. Excused were Linda Lang, Sharon Bn-mn, Tim Dow, and Sanford Kern. Staff members present at the Board meeting included Tom Peterson, Joe Frank, Ken Waido, Debbie deBesche, Ted Shepard, Gail Ault and Renee Joseph. Legal representative was Paul Eckman. Planning Director, Tom Peterson, reviewed the Consent Agenda noting staff was requesting several items be pulled. Pulled by staff were item 9) #17-87 Amendment to Ponderosa Paris PUD - Preliminary, and items 21 and 22) #21-87 & 21-87A Taft Canyon First Annexation and Zoning and #22-87 & 22-87A Taft Canyon Second Annexation and Zoning. Interested parties also pulled items 2 and 3) #57-86E Sunstone Village PUD, Phases 2 & 3 - Prelimi- nary, #57-86F Sunstone Village PUD, Phase 2 - Final, and item 12) #40-79F Mountain Range Subdivision - Preliminary. Item 6) #25-81H Regency Park PUD, Phase 1 -Final, was continued to the June 22 meeting. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda were 1) Minutes of the April 20, 1987 meeting, 4) #25-811 Villages at Harmony West - Amended Master Plan, 5) #25-81G Regency Park PUD of Villages at Harmony West - Revised Preliminary, 7) #3-87C Oak Ridge Estates Subdivision - Final, 8) #110-79F South Glen PUD 3rd Filing -Amended Preliminary, 10) #13-82AB Oak Ridge Business Park PUD 8th Filing -Preliminary and Final, 11) #13-82AC Oak Ridge Business Park PUD 9th Filing -Preliminary, 13) #116-80A Bank Center Square - Kelly Moore Paints PUD -Amended Preliminary and Final, 14) #13-82X Oak Ridge Village PUD, 3rd Fil- ing - Final, 15) #13-82Y Oak Ridge Village PUD, 4th Filing - Final, 16) #13-82Z Oak Ridge Village PUD, 5th Filing - Final, 17) #71-84B Alta Vista Subdivision, 4th Filing - Preliminary and Final, 18) #9-82S Southridge Greens, Fairway Five PUD, Tracts D & F - Final, 19) #65-820 Fairbrooke III Subdivision - Final, 20) #64-86 & 64-86A East Vine 8th Annexation and Zon- ing, and 23) #27-87 The Point PUD, Terry Points Estates - County Refer- ral. Board Member O'Dell moved to approve the Consent Agenda and Member Kern seconded. Motion carried 7-0. SUNSM E VILLAGE PUD, Phases 2 & 3 - Preliminary - #57-86E SUNS1M VILLAGE PUD, Phase 2 - Final - #57-86F Staff member Ted Shepard gave project description. Glenn Stephens, repre- senting the applicant, indicated he was available to answer any questions. 3 Planning & Zoning Boa*inutes • May 18, 1987 page 7 TAFT CANYON FIRST ANNExATION AND ZONING - #21-87, 21-87A TAFT CANYON SECOND ANNEXATION AND ZONING - #22-87, 22-87A Member Dow indicated a conflict of interest on these two items and he would be refraining from the discussion and vote. Ken Waido gave staff description noting two letters had been received May 14 from property owners in the area: Mr. & Mrs. Rinne expressed concern with the design of the subdivision streets, access and safety. Since this did not deal with the annexation_ issue the letter was forwarded to the County Commissioners. A letter from Thomas Fay expressed concern over the City's involuntary annexation of two 10-foot wide lots on the periphery of this subdivision. Mr. Waido explained the City agreed not to involuntarily annex Taft Canyon prior to March 1, 1991. John Sample, 4204 Trowbridge, stood up and indicated his opposition to the annexations. He was on a fixed inane and felt improvement costs would impose a hardship, building permit prices would rise, property would be harder to sell. Mr. Waido explained the infrastructure would not require upgrading, the sub- division could retain its present water and sewer arrangement unless the residents wanted to upgrade or if sanitary systems failed and the health department required upgrade. At that time a special assessment district could be formed. Building permit costs should not affect market pricing. Davis Fields, 4328 Picadilly, felt the City and developer had agreed to annexing a funny lot to hinder the subdivisions ability to remain in the County. The implications of this proposal should have been explained more fully in the letter. Mr. Waido pointed out these two annexations will not create an enclave as there is an additional 3/4 mile of additional perimeter needed. Mr. Fields indicated he understood the City's intend. Mr. Waido went on to explain the City and the County created the Urban Growth Agreement, of which Taft Canyon was a part, and wanted to annex the UGA as soon as the properties were eligible. The County's responsibility of providing urban services (road maintenance and police protection) would then be released. Member Edwards added that if Mr. Fields' concerns were not adequately addressed the Board was merely making a recommendation to City Council and he could discuss this with Council. Member Crews felt two motions would be required on this item. Member Strap moved to approve Taft Canyon First Annexation and Zoning, 1 Member O'Dell l seconded. Motion carried 7-0. Member Brown moved to approve Taft Canyon Second Annexation and Zoning, Member O'Dell seconded. Motion carried 7-0.