The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUPERTOTS AT OAKRIDGE WEST, 2ND FILING - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 23-87D - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY0 c° Plemorandum Ln 0 00 0 To: Stuart VIa.c11i I Ian, Everitt Enterprises, Inc. 0 Frank Vaught. Va.ught*Frye, Architects o o Fort Collins Staff J 10 o From: Hatt Del ich 0 z Gate: Flarch 5, 1990 J W 0 O Subject: Supertots Learning Center at Oak Ridge West J traffic analysis W Z) z W Q It is proposed that a Supertots Learning Center z (Day Care) be located at the north end of Oa.k Ridge (.-Jest } in Fort Collins, Colorado. The location is shot%in in z Figure 1 (Site Plan from Oak Ridge PUG Site Access m Study) . Figure 2 shot%is the site plan of the proposed Super -tots Learning Center. Table 1 Trip Generation Gai 1 y A.M. Peak P.Fl Peak Land Use Trips Trip. Trips Trips Tr- ip=_. in out in out Gay Care - 10.5 KSF (P,ate./KSF) (6.70) (6.02) (5..34) (5.='0) (6.40) Trip=. 700 63 56 62 67 CD z cc W z This area was previously proposed as part of Oak CD Ridge kle=.t Office Par -It. A traffic anal > =s i s t,ias prepared w J in October. 1?85 for the Oak Ridge 4Je=.t Off ice Park. > Table 1 =.how s the trip generation rates from Trip Generation. 4th Edition, ITE, 1987, for a day care = • z center. V o a Access to this site is proposed from Lemay Avenue, Wo o viith additional future access to the parcel to the south vlhen it develops.. Figure 3 shot%is the 1 -'88./8? peak hour• z < traffic at the intersections adjacent to Oak Pidge (,,lest. ~ The Lemay/Oakr i dge intersection t-ji 1 1 be impacted the most by the Supertots Learning Center. The Harmony/ Wc� U_ Lemay intersection ,,ill] also be impacted, but due to the cc small increase in traffic and existing level of service A operation during the peak hours, the change in Q operation due to the Supertots Learning Center will be minimal. Since this use was not included in the short range analysis in the Oak Ridge PUD Site Access_. Study, a revised short range analysis is provided. Figure 4 shows the short range (1990) peak hour assignment using the assignment from the Site Access. Study and the Supertots. Learning Center. Consideration was also given to the proposed Office Park located on the east side of Lemay Avenue. Table 2 shows the short range operation at the key intersections related to the Supertots Learning Center. Peak hour operation at these intersec- tions is acceptable (level of service D or better). Calculation forms are provided in Appendix A. The long range (2010) peak hour assignment is shovin in Figure 5 (from Figure S of the Oak Ridge PUD Site Access. Study and the assignment of the Supertots Learn- ing Center trips). Table 3 shot -is the long range peak hour operation at key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Peak hour operation at the Lema>,/Oakridge intersection will be acceptable (from the Oak Ridge PUD Site Access Study). The proposed access to Lemay will not operate acceptably (left -turn exits from the site will be at level of service E) . However. delays vjil1 be confined to only loft -turning vehicles if a loft -turn lane is provided at this access.. This. left - turn lane should be at least 45 feet long_ (enough to store two vehicles). This use wi 1 1 have alternative access to the Lemay/Rule intersection in the future. This intersection is likely to be signalized. The geometric requirements along Lemay Avenue are shown in Figure 6. These requirements are based upon the anticipated long range traffic volumes and can be accommodated in the available space along Lemay Avenue. It is proposed that the access to the existing church to the north will be closed and shared viith the Supertots Learning Center. This will cause the Supertots access to line up with the one to the Office Park on the east side of Lemay Avenue. Peak hours of the Supertots Learning Center and the church are quite different. Therefore, there should be no conflict of traffic between these two uses. Conclusion It is concluded that the proposed Supertots Learning Center can be accommodated on the public streets in this_. area. In the short range future, the Supertots Learning Center access. to Lemay Avenue will operate acceptably during the peak hours with full -turn access. In the long range future (2010), left -turns from this access will operate unacceptably, but delays should be confined to the on -site driveway. Separate exit lanes are recommended at this access. These left. 0 0 turns will have alternative access via the Lemay Pule intersection. �J SUPERTOTS LEARNING CENTER AREA B Business Services HARMONY f I 1 � i� AREA C ' I I I, 1 ►, 1 I r, 1 I i r, 1 1 �. r'j Industrial / 1 I>- Business i �< us ness - Services -`� Park 1 �� ,t4PAREA F Industrial Business Park AREA G ; AREA H / 1 Single / i 1 Single /Multi i� AREA J IMulti '� Family ; Single Family Family I , AREA K - Single Family I AREA A I i Business Services �I 1 AREA E 1 g l r SITE LOCATION FIGURE 1 0 • I � Existing Church i I i Existing Parking :.. 10,500 s.f. Parking Parking SITE SUPERTOTS LEARNING CENTER SITE PLAN Q N FIGURE 2 - 0- �9 cP d- �458/944 cA �—SZ4/9Z9 - 524/4filo HARMONY 92�/41oZ —� I 10?2/491 1050/544 —� 53/44 —� O Zln/4 —� Z9/4 0/0 NNW OAK RIDGE 0/0 013 o 0/0 —O/tZ RULE o/ 1- o�UN 1�o �-- ZZ/ 110 1 KEENLAND a 9 w No AM/PM J r- 1988 / 89 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC FIGURE 3 s (:SITE:) 0 — I cv4/ 18Z OAKRIDGE o 0 0�o a w J 9 OLo r— I I/4 45/54—� IJoM. N SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ACCESS AM/PM FIGURE 4 Table 2 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Intersection AM PM Lemay/Oaks i dge WB LT D C WB RT A A SB LT A A Lemay/Access WB LT C B VIB T/RT A A EB LT C C EB T/*RT A A NB LT A A SB LT A A Table 3 Long Range Peak Hour Operation Intersection AH PM Lemay/Oakridge (Signal) A D Lemay/Access WB LT E E WB T,' RT A A EB LT E E EB T/RT A A NB LT A B SB LT A A Lema.y/Ru l e (Signal) A A SITE Lo op� � Ln 45/ 80 So/ZZO 40/23o ?o/ss 30/ 150 a w .J L 5/10 35/45 —l"e 00M . ZO/Z5 —1` OAKRIDGE ACCESS Ln o r0 �— 40/110 E— 2o/2.p 15/I10 I5/-70 RULE IS/ZO —'► LD cLo AM/PM LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC FIGURE 5 • I I • OAKRIDGE DRIVE I �t I II W I I D z W I I Proposed Oakridge Office Park Q` I I Existing Church I i 'I I I Il SUPERTOTS ( I I LEARNING I I CENTER I I I I :I I Q W I I J; i I i I :l I�RULE DRIVE LONG RANGE GEOMETRIC / STRIPING PLAN OF LEMAY AVENUE FIGURE 6 • A1=1PE1--jD I X A „'°.5 Mr tlni_".)('NAL)ZEIl 1NTER=ECT!ONS �'zsc xtxxxYxxxxixxxxxx�l xxxtxx.k.Cxx:#xxxaxxiXA. k3A;.Kyxxxxtxxxx)R■xx#xXxx». +..K 1:1 I0ENTIFYINR INEOP.MATION AVERAGE RUNNING. SPEED. MAJOR STREE'.............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION ............................... .. 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... oakridae NAME OF: THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... )emay NAME OF THE ANALYST ............... .............. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 2/19/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. am _nsn short OTHER INFORMATION:--t%Pg INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EC WB N8 5L. ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 10 0 155 THRU -- 0 °02 340 RIGHT -- 164 25 0 NUMBER OF LANES ----------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SF. LANE: -- _ CAPACITY ANc LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Flacie-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIA.L MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITs CAPA ITY CAPACITY. CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcpn) c (ocph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET We. LEFT 11 231 195 195 1 RIGHT 180 ^28 928 926 7 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 171 766 766 166 595 A 1985 HCM• UN•_=IGNALIZE1; Yi i# i X i YYX Z# XX Z Y Y Y# Y#it#flC# Xi # i t XiX Xi i# i X #i i iY >X.X X# XS:X i X X #Y X# #iii #i YXl4 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAG` RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREE- ...... ... .. 5 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................. AREA POPULATION ................................. 8C000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... oakridae NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ............... ... lemav NAME OF THE ANALYST ........... .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy'.................. 2/19/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.............................c;a om snort OTHER INFORMATION: -"i.e INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYP: WESTBOUND: STOP _TGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- ES WE NB S= __- --- -- ---- LEFT 0 THRU -- 0 715 ?62 RIGHT -- )22 10 0 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------------------------- EE WE NB 5E --------- LANE - CA.PI.''',' AND LEVEL--OF-SERVICE Page-' --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAACITY MOVEMENT V(Pcph) c (pcch) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LO'- r. M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOP STREET „F. L=IT is 294 "S ?75 257 r RIGHT 200 92'= 929 929 7296A ^MAJOR STRE T SF LEFT @t 166 168 768 686 A • 195' HCM. VN516NALIZE INTErcLECT:ON'' �aa - ### YY#Y XXX X XY# Y Y YXX Y# XY #Y Y Y XX X # Y YYY Y YY # •:XY YYX XY X X X YX IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET... ....... 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... .iema; NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)................. 2/19/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. am ma snort OTHER INFORMATION: 3.. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB W8 NE_ SE. ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 1 '3 15 THRU 0 0 250 285 RIGHT 11 2 150 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- F, We. r sp LANES ..AN, TP CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE r"aae-S --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcphl c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R 5H ------- ----------------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 1 303 293 293 29 C THROUGH 0 346 337 > - > 339 6 RIGHT 2 949 949 > 949 949 > 947 947 >A A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 50 317 309 S09 260 C THROUGH 0 357 348 > 348 > 348 > 8 RIGHT 12 924 924 > 0 924 > 0 912 > A MAJOR STREET NO LEFT 14 759 759 759 744 A SO LEFT i 1 803 80S 803 787 A n LJ 195 F:CM: UNS:GNAL1ZEC INTERSECTION`_; Page-i iZYiiiYZXiiXZZYYZZXiiXYiYiXiiZZZiZXZYYXZYIZYZZXiX:t XYXYiXiiiXXZXXiiiii IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING' SPEED. MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............. ••................ ' AREA POPULATION .................................. 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 2/19/90 T'.ME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. se pm short OTHER INFORMATION: wg INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTEP.SECTION TYPE: 4-LEG M:.JOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WF, NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 54 4 12 2 TaR,U a 0 260 i46 RIGHT 13 11 1 50 NUMBER OF LANE!i AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EF. WP. NF. LANF U°,A6- Tr- TP CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE page --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAPED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT .vcph) c (ocoh) c (pcph) c (ocoh) c = - - v LOS - M SH R H MINOR STP.EE' WE. LEFT 4 ::40 33'. THROUGH 0 389 385 RIGHT 12 963 963 MINOR STREET EB LEFT 59 '57 350 THROUGH 0 405 400 RIGHT 14 045 945 MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 13 794 794 SB LEFT 2 829 829 "' 3 B > 385 38 B 963 963 > 951 951 >A A. 350 291 C > 400 > 400 > A 0 945 > 0 930 > A 794 781 A 829 827 A I ArPFEIAD I x t 0135 HCM: (w SIPNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pao(--, #YiiYYYYYXiiYXXtX�tiYXYYYYYYYICYYXiiXXYXYYYYYYYYYYXYIkYYYX7:X MtXYXIkYYYYYXi IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. 1 AREA POPULATION .................................. 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 2/19/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. am OTHER INFORMATION: long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB N8 SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 35 _ 20 10 THRU 0 0 765 550 RIGHT 20 5 15 40 NUMBER OF LANE=; AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EP• WE' NB SE ----- ----- --- - 1 kNES _ LAW 1•:Af .- TP Tr, CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 79 74 THROUGH 0 106 102 RIGHT 6 709 709 MINOR STREET EB LEFT 39 83 79 THROUGH 0 109 104 RIGHT 22 795 795 MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 22 562 562 SB LEFT 11 438 438 74 c 102 > le 0 > 709 709 > 704 704 >A A 79 41 E 104 > 104 > 0 0 795 > 0 773 > A 562 540 A. 438 427 A • 1985 HCM-. (INSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS #YYYX#X#Y###]KY#YYYx#Y#YXYYYX:KY#YYYYXYXYYYYY##YM(Y YYX7lY#YYXXYYYY#YYXYXY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET .............. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................................. I AREA POPULATION .................................. 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 2/19/90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................ OTHER INFORMATION long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 5 20 5 THRU 0 0 '65 3S0 RIGHT 25 10 5 40 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ek WB NF, SE ! ANES _ L.ANt. L i TR _ - TR CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pa4e-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(ocph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 60 56 THROUGH 0 75 72 RIGHT 11 714 714 MINOR STREET ES LEFT 50 60 57 THROUGH 0 75 72 RIGHT 28 657 657 MAJOR STREET NE. LEFT 22 368 368 SB LEFT 6 445 445 56 7* E 72 7 > '14 714 > 703 703 >A A 57 7 E 72 > 72 > E > 0 657 > 0 629 > A 368 346 E. 445 439 A 0