HomeMy WebLinkAboutOAK RIDGE WEST 1ST FILING HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL - FINAL - 23-87B - - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
AUGUST 24, 1987
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at
6:33 p.m. in Council Chambers of New City Hall, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort
Collins, Colorado. Board members present were Dave Edwards, Sanford Kern,
Laurie O'Dell, Don Crews, Linda Lang (arriving at 6:37 p.m.), Bernie Strom,
and Alternate Jim Klataske.
Board members who attended the August 21 work session included Don Crews,
Laurie O'Dell, Bernie Strom, Dave Edwards, and Jim Klataske. Excused were
Linda Lang, Sharon Brown, and Sanford Kern.
Staff members present at the Board meeting included Tom Peterson, Joe
Frank, Debbie deBesche, Ted Shepard, Gail Ault, Jim Newell and Mike Herzig.
Legal representative was Paul Eckman.
Planning Director, Tom Peterson, reviewed the Consent Agenda noting staff
was requesting item 69-84E Fort Ram Village PUD, 1st Filing - Final be
pulled. Items remaining on the Consent Agenda were 1) Minutes of the July
27, 1987 meeting, 2) #25-81D Villages at Harmony West, 2nd Filing, Tracts
B,C,D,F,H, and G - Preliminary - One Year Extension, 4) #23-87B Oak Ridge
West, 1st Filing, Healthcare International- Final, 5) #17-87 Ponderosa Park
PUD Replat - Final, 6) #47-87,A Vine Drive Business Park Annexation and
Zoning 7) #12-87,A Albrecht Annexation and Zoning, 8) #49-87,A Link-N-
Greens Annexation and Zoning, and 9) #46-87 Kissell Investments Rezoning
-County Referral. Board Member Edwards indicated he would abstain from item
4 due to conflict of interest. Member O'Dell moved to approve the Consent
Agenda items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. Member Edwards seconded. Motion car-
ried 7-0. Member Kern moved to approve item r on -the Consent Agenda. Mem-
ber Strap seconded. Motion passed 6-0.
FORT RAM VILLAGE PUD, 1st FILING - Final - #69-84E
Chairman Crews and Sandy Kern noted a perceived conflict and abstained from
the vote.
Staff member Debbie deBesche gave project description.
Frank Vaught stated he was representing the developer. He commented he did
not have a presentation ready since he felt there would not be opposition
in regards to the project. He explained the proposed reduction in density
for the project. He stated there would be approximately a 20% decrease in
units, f rom 312 to 218. He indicated there would be adequate parking
available. The required spaces for parking were 401 but they would be pro-
viding 491 spaces.
Debbie deBesche stated staff recommends approval with one condition: that
the project would be contingent upon the developer closing the transaction
with CSU before December 31, 1987. She stated if the project was not
closed before this date the approval would be considered void.