HomeMy WebLinkAboutNE PROSPECT & I-25 ODP - MA210006 - - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEW  Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6689
970.224.6134 ‑ fax
fcgov.com
November 20, 2020
Roger Sherman
Fort Collins, CO
Re: Prospect & I‑25 ODP Minor Amendment
Description of project: This is a request to amend the Prospect & I‑25 Overall
Development Plan (ODP) originally approved in 2004. The ODP includes the area directly
northeast of the I‑25 and Prospect Road interchange (parcel # 8715000021, 8715000022,
8715000009, 8715300003, 8715300002, and 8715300004). The intent of the proposed
minor amendment is to reflect changes to parcel boundaries, the devolved CDOT frontage
road, and the connections to Fox Grove that have occurred since the time of the original
approval. The site is within the Industrial (I), General Commercial (CG), and Urban Estate
(UE) zone districts and the process would be subject to a Minor Amendment (MA) process.
Please see the following summary of comments regarding Prospect & I‑25 ODP Minor
Amendment. The comments offered informally by staff during the Conceptual Review will
assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. Modifications and
additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. If you
have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process,
please contact your Development Review Coordinator, Brandy Bethurem Harras via phone at
970‑416‑2744 or via email at bbethuremharras@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary
Development Review Coordinator
Contact: Brandy Bethurem Harras, 970‑416‑2744, bbethuremharras@fcgov.com
1. I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting
process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or
need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your
team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me
informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! Response: Acknowledged
2. As part of your submittal you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter
is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses
to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color.
When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be
thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why
comments have not been addressed, when applicable. Response: Acknowledged
3. The request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule:
https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/fees.php.
I will provide estimated fees, which are due at time of project submittal for formal review.
This is an estimate of the initial fees to begin the development review process based on
your Conceptual Review Application. As noted in the comments, there are additional fees
required by other departments, and additional fees at the time of building permit. The City
of Fort Collins fee schedule is subject to change ‑ please confirm these estimates before
submitting. If you have any questions about fees, please reach out to me. Response: Acknowledged
4. Minor Amendment Submittals are accepted any day of the week and are normally routed within
one business day. The reviewers will have two weeks to review your project. You can expect a
comment letter and any electronic redlines from me a full business day following the comments due date.
Response: Acknowledged
Planning Services
Contact: Kai Kleer, 970‑416‑4284, kkleer@fcgov.com
1. The Overall Development Plan is required to show street pattern/connectivity standards
both within and adjacent to the boundaries of the plan as required pursuant to Sections
3.6.1 and 3.6.3(A) through (F). The overall development plan must show appropriate
transportation improvements to be constructed and must demonstrate how the
development, when fully constructed, will conform to the Transportation Level of Service
Requirements as contained in Section 3.6.4 by submittal of a Master Level Transportation Impact Study.
The plan should show connections into the site at least every 660 feet along the parcel
boundary (along Carriage Parkway). Show all internal vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle movement.
Block pattern should be established for ‘Activity Center’( aka Commercial zoned area of
the ODP). Block size not to exceed 10 acres. Response: The local internal street pattern is not established with the approved ODP and is not indicated with this amendment however, the
access locations are indicated with arrows generally spaced per LCUSS Requirements along the revised current approved street pattern. The block size requirements are listed on the proposed
amended ODP.
2. An Overall Development Plan must provide for the location of transportation connections
to adjoining properties in such manner as to ensure connectivity into and through the
overall development plan site from neighboring properties for vehicular, pedestrian and
bicycle movement, as required pursuant to Section 3.6.3(F) and Section 3.2.2(C)(6).
The plan does demonstrate the correct alignment and connection into the site, however
the internal framework of streets is missing from the plan. Response: The local internal street pattern is not established with the approved ODP and is not indicated with this amendment
however, the access locations are indicated with arrows generally spaced per LCUSS Requirements along the revised current approved street pattern
3. An Overall Development Plan is required to show the general location and approximate
size of all natural areas, habitats and features within its boundaries and shall indicate the
applicant's proposed rough estimate of the natural area buffer zones as required pursuant to Section 3.4.1(E).
For this site, the Lake Canal and any other natural resource identified through the ECS
memo will require delineation on the ODP. Response: The general location and size of natural areas, habitats, and features within the boundary are indicated on the amended ODP.
4. Please ensure the proposed ODP amendment is consistent with the appropriate
Drainage Basin Master Plan. Please coordinate closely with City of Fort Collins and
Town of Timnath Staff to determine the correct approach for this site. Response: The release rates and detention pond volumes are based on the Town of Timnath Master Drainage Plan.
All other drainage criteria will be per the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual.
5. Any standards relating to housing density and mix of uses will be applied over the entire
overall development plan, not on each individual project development plan review. Response: Acknowledged. The ODP does not address housing density and future development will be required
to meet current land use requirements as applicable at the time of application for development.
6. Please show phasing and land‑use breakdown. Response: Land use data by zone is provided as per the current approved ODP. Phasing is shown however sequence of development is subject
to market demand.
7. The ‘Activity Center’ boundary should be depicted on the ODP. The boundary is depicted
in the I‑25 Subarea Plan for your reference. Response: Activity Center boundary has been added to the ODP Amendment.
8. Generally, the ‘Project Notes’ should carry over and be updated as necessary for the
amended ODP with the addition of the following notes:
“All development that falls within the planning area for the Prospect Road Streetscape
Program shall comply with the Streetscape Program Standards as adopted by the City.”
Please add the boundary of the Prospect Road Streetscape Program to the ODP
“Development located within one thousand three hundred twenty (1,320) feet (one‑quarter
[¼] mile) of the centerline of I‑25 shall be subject to the requirements of Division 3.9 of the
City of Fort Collins Land Use Code.” Please add the I‑25 subarea boundary on the ODP. Response: The I-25 subarea boundary line has been added to the amended ODP and notes added.
9. Though nothing is shown on the master street plan, please work with Transfort to
determine and callout the general location of any future bus stops on site. Response: Approximate locations of bus stops have been added to the ODP along carriage Parkway.
10. There was some conversation at the Conceptual Review of amending the Urban Estate
zoning along Carriage Parkway on the NE portion of the site. Generally, staff would likely
support this amendment based on the devolution of the frontage road and realignment of carriage parkway.
To start the rezoning process, the applicant will be required to submit a rezoning
application and provide a narrative and legal description of the zoning boundary that
addresses the criterion located under 2.9.4 of the City's Land Use Code. The rezoning
would be required to seek a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Board and
approval by City Council. It is anticipated that there would be little to no controversy based
on the nature of the rezoning. Response: A separate rezone petition is being submitted for the I/UE interface.
11. There was conversation regarding the annexation and zoning of the devolved CDOT
ROW. More conversation is needed internally with staff to determine if this would be a
City‑initiated annexation and zoning.
The annexation and zoning of any portion of the site would require a recommendation by
the planning and zoning board and final review and approval by City Council (much like a
rezoning application). This process is governed by State Statute and typically requires a
105‑130‑day timeline to complete. Response: A separate annexation and rezone petition is being submitted for the devolved ROW.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Dave Betley, 970‑221‑6573, dbetley@fcgov.com
1. Future projects will have to dedicate right of way and address infrastructure issues. Response: Acknowledged
2. The elimination of the frontage road reduces access alternatives to the overall
development property. The applicant is being required to update the traffic study to
address circulation patterns. Response: An updated traffic study is provided with this application
3. If the applicant has not done so, they should reach out to Poudre Fire to coordinate access issues. Response: Access is limited by current approved roadways. Future development
will need to coordinate access at time of PDP.
4. At the time of development, a development agreement will be required. Response: Acknowledged
Department: Traffic Operations
Contact: Steve Gilchrist, 970‑224‑6175, sgilchrist@fcgov.com
1. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: An updated Traffic Impact Study has been requested prior
to this submittal detailing the changes in this area and the improvements that are
occurring with other projects. This will need to be reviewed for approval of this Minor Amendment. Response: An updated traffic study is provided with this application
Department: Stormwater Floodplain
Contact: Claudia Quezada, (970)416‑2494, cquezada@fcgov.com
1. Portions of this property are currently located in the FEMA‑regulated, 100‑year Boxelder
Creek floodway and floodplain and erosion buffer and must comply with the safety
regulations of Chapter 10 of City Municipal Code. A FEMA Flood Risk map is attached. Response: The Natural Habitat Buffer Zone and 100-Year Boxelder Creek Floodway and Floodplain are
shown on ODP drawings. The FEMA Flood Risk map and excerpts from the Boxelder Creek 6 CLOMR are included in the drainage report.
2. Any construction activities in the floodplain (e.g. grading, fill, structures, sidewalk or curb
& gutter installation/replacement, roadway construction, utility work, landscaping, etc.)
must be preceded by an approved floodplain use permit, the appropriate permit
application fees, and approved plans. Response: A note is added to the drainage plan and report.
3. From the submittal materials provided, it appears that the development is laid out so
that the floodway will be located within an open area on the northwest. Please keep in
mind that any work in the floodway requires a No‑Rise Certification prepared by a
Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer. Response: A note is added to the drainage plan and report.
4. There is also a mapped erosion buffer in the open space parcel, please keep in mind
that detention ponds or water quality ponds are not allowed in an erosion buffer and any
disturbance to said buffer will require a stability study. Response: Detention pond locations and sizes shown on the drainage plan are approximate. Actual location of detention and
water quality ponds will be located during Project Development Plan to avoid the erosion buffer areas.
5. INFORMATION ONLY: Please show both floodway and floodplain boundaries, as well
as the erosion buffer zone, on site drawings as applicable. The submitted drawing does
not accurately depict the boundary lines. Contact Beck Anderson of Stormwater Master
Planning at banderson@fcgov.com for floodplain CAD line work. Response: Floodway and floodplain boundaries and well as the erosion buffer zone have been added to the ODP.
Department: Erosion Control
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970‑218‑2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
6. Annexations, Overall Development Plans (ODPs), Basic Development Reviews (BDRs)
w/ only lot line changes, or Minor Amendments to prior ODPs alone does not trigger
erosion control requirements. Any future projects or planned work after annexation, that
disturbs greater than 10,000 square feet will trigger erosion control requirements. The
erosion control requirements are located in the Stormwater Design Criteria in Chapter 2
Section 6.0 a copy of the requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/erosion Response: Required erosion control plan and documents will be provided during Project Development Plan and
Final process per the City of Fort Collins requirements.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Matt Simpson, (970)416‑2754, masimpson@fcgov.com
7. Stormwater criteria manual compliance and ODP Stormwater requirements (site specific comment):
The design of this site must conform to the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual
(FCSCM). Chapter 2, Section 3, presents Overall Development Plan (ODP) submittal
requirements for Stormwater. The stormwater criteria manual is available on our website here:
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders‑and‑developers/development‑forms‑gu
idelines‑regulations/stormwater‑criteria Response: A drainage plan and drainage memo is included as part of the ODP submittal.
8. Drainage Master plan (site specific comment):
This site is located outside of the City of Fort Collins stormwater master planning area;
however, it is within the Town of Timnath’s drainage master planning area. The Town of
Timnath will need to be consulted for additional drainage and discharge requirements. Response: The release rates and detention pond volumes are based on the Town of Timnath Master
Drainage Plan. All other drainage criteria will be per the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual.
9. Documentation requirements (site specific comment):
A drainage report and drainage map, prepared by a Colorado Professional Engineer,
will be required for the updated ODP. The ODP Drainage Report must show drainage
feasibility and design parameters for the proposed development. It must also show
general compliance with the appropriate Drainage Basin Master Plan. Response: A drainage plan and drainage memo is included as part of the ODP submittal.
10. Stormwater outfall (site specific comment):
The northern portion of this site appears to discharge existing surface flows into the
Timnath Reservoir Inlet Canal. The southern portion of this site appears to discharge
existing surface flows into Lake Canal or to a local surface flow path. For this
development project to proceed an adequate outfall will need to be determined. Any
formalized or developed drainage into irrigation facilities will require an agreement with
the irrigation company owning the ditch. Response: Outfall locations are identified in the drainage plan and memo. The development will coordinate with relevant ditch owners to obtain
necessary authorization during Project Development Plan.
11. Detention requirements (site specific comment):
Future development will require onsite detention for the runoff volume difference
between the 100‑year developed inflow rate and the 2‑year historic release rate.
Please note that the City has landscaping requirements for stormwater detention ponds.
These requirements can be found in the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual,
Chapter 8, Section 3.0 and in Appendix B (Landscape Design Standards and
Guidelines for Stormwater and Detention Facilities). Response: The release rates and detention pond volumes are based on the Town of Timnath Master Drainage Plan. All other drainage
criteria will be per the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual.
12. Water Quality and Low Impact Development requirements (standard comment):
Future development will require stormwater quality treatment for all new or modified
impervious areas. In addition, the City requires the use of Low Impact Development
(LID) methods to treat stormwater quality on all new or redeveloping property, including
sites required to be brought into compliance with the Land Use Code. There are two (2)
categories of LID requirements; the development will need to meet one of the two following options:
1. LID with Permeable Pavers: When using the permeable pavers option, 50% of the
new or modified impervious areas must be treated by LID methods. Of the new or
modified paved areas, 25% must be pervious.
2. LID ‑ without Pavers: 75% of all new or modified impervious areas must be treated
by LID methods. This typically consists of a rain garden or bioretention system, but other options are allowed.
The remainder of the water quality treatment can be accomplished ‘standard’ or LID
water quality methods. Accepted methods are described in the Fort Collins Stormwater
Criteria Manual (FCSCM), Chapter 7:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders‑and‑developers/development‑forms‑gui
delines‑regulations/stormwater‑criteria Response: The site will provide water quality and LID per the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual during the Project Development Plan.
13. Offsite Stormwater Flows (standard comment):
The development will need review topography and drainage reports from adjacent
developments and determine if there are any offsite flows that cross onto this property.
The development will need to accept and pass any existing offsite flows. Response: We anticipate minor offsite stormwater flows from adjacent properties. Offsite stormwater flows will
be analyzed during Project Development Plan.
14. Fees (standard comment):
Future development will be required to pay stormwater development fees. The 2020 city
wide Stormwater development fee (PIF) is $9,447/acre of new impervious area over
350 square feet and there is a $1,045/acre of site review fee. No fee is charged for existing impervious area.
These fees are to be paid at the time each building permit is issued. Information on fees can be found at:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders‑and‑developers/plant‑investment‑develo
pment‑fees or contact our Utility Fee and Rate Specialists at (970) 416‑4252 for
questions on fees. There is also an erosion control escrow required before the
Development Construction permit is issued. The amount of the escrow is determined by
the design engineer, and is based on the site disturbance area, cost of the measures, or
a minimum amount in accordance with the Fort Collins Stormwater Manual.
Monthly fees ‑ http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/rates Response: Acknowledged
Department: Water‑Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Matt Simpson, (970)416‑2754, masimpson@fcgov.com
1. Other service district (site specific comment):
This project site is located within the East Larimer County (ELCO) Water District and
the Boxelder Sanitation District for water and sewer service. Please contact them at
(970) 493‑2044 (ELCO) and (970) 498‑0604 (Boxelder) for development requirements. Response: The development will coordinate with East Larimer County Water District and Boxelder Sanitation
District regarding water and sewer improvements during Project Development Plan.
2. Water conservation (standard comment):
Please note that future development will be required to follow the City’s water
conservation standards for landscape and irrigation. Information on these requirements
can be found at: http://www.fcgov.com/standards Response: Acknowledged
Department: Electric Engineering
Contact: Rob Irish, 970‑224‑6167, rirish@fcgov.com
1. Light & Power does not have any comment with regard to amending the parcel boundaries. Response: Acknowledged
2. Light & Power does have existing electric infrastructure running along the NE Frontage
Rd., adjacent to these parcels, and along E Prospect Rd. There are possible future
plans to extend a duct bank through these parcels with the extension of Carriage Pkwy. Response: The development will coordinate with Fort Collins Light and Power regarding utility
improvements during Project Development Plan.
3. Please contact Light & Power Engineering at ElectricProjectEngineering@fcgov.com if
you have any questions. Please reference our policies, construction practices,
development charge processes, electric services standards, and fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders‑and‑developers. Response: Acknowledged
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Kelly Smith, , ksmith@fcgov.com
1. PRIOR TO APPROVAL
An Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) is required by City of Fort Collins Land Use
Code (LUC) Section 3.4.1 as the site is within 500 feet of LUC defined natural habitats
and features (ditch). Note the buffer standard of 50ft for ditches, 100ft for Boxelder,
50ft‑100ft for wetlands depending on size, as you proceed with your site design
process. Because this is an ODP, a memo‑based ECS can be submitted for this
proposed project. The ECS should address LUC 3.4.1(D)(1) available for view online
and identify "top of bank" of the ditch, edge of wetlands and top of bank for Boxelder
Creek. Please contact me if you wish to discuss the scope and requirements of the
ECS memo further and/or to schedule an onsite meeting. The ECS is due a minimum of
10 working days prior to next submittal.
Online LUC link: https://library.municode.com/co/fort_collins/codes/land_use Response: Defered
2. FOR INFORMATION
According to Section 2.3.2(H)(3)(5) of the Land Use Code, "the overall development
plan shall show the general location and approximate size of all natural areas, habitats
and features within its boundaries and shall indicate the applicant's proposed rough
estimate of the natural area buffer zones as required pursuant to Section 3.4.1(E)." Response: Natural areas, habitats, and features are shown on the amended ODP.
3. FOR APPROVAL
The ODP shall graphically indicate natural resources documented in the ECS, and
general buffer distances, with notes explaining the resource. For example, the ditches,
raptor nests, wetlands, Boxelder Creek, and any other features present on the site. Response: Natural areas, habitats features and buffers are shown on the amended ODP plan.
4. FOR APPROVAL
Please include the following note on the ODP: This Overall Development Plan shows the
general location and approximate size of all natural areas, habitats, and features within
its boundaries and the proposed rough estimate of the natural area buffer zones as
required by Land Use Code Section 3.4.1(E). Detailed mapping of the site's natural
areas, habitats, and features will be provided at the time of individual PDP submittals. General buffer
zones shown on this ODP may be reduced or enlarged by the decision maker during the PDP process Response: Acknowledged
5. FOR APPROVAL
Please add the following statement to the notes on any sheets of the ODP, Master Utility
Plan and Master Drainage Plan that show the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone: Please see
Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the natural habitat buffer zones. Response: Note has been added to the amended ODP.
6. FOR INFORMATION
A site visit with a City Environmental Planner may be necessary to determine which
features require documentation and buffering on the ODP. If you have questions, or
would like to schedule a site visit, please coordinate the scheduling with the project
Development Review Coordinator. Response: Acknowledged
Department: Forestry
Contact: Christine Holtz, , choltz@fcgov.com
1. PRE‑SUBMITTAL: Forestry Tree Inventory
Trees provide many environmental and socioeconomic benefits including reduced
cooling expenses, providing natural wind breaks, improving air quality, and increasing
property values. There appear to be existing trees on‑site and near the limits of
development. After the parcel boundary amendment is confirmed, are there plans to
develop or impact existing trees? If so, regardless of impact please schedule an on‑site
meeting with City Forestry (choltz@fcgov.com) to obtain tree inventory and mitigation
information. Existing significant trees should be retained to the extent reasonably feasible. Response: Acknowledged
Department: Park Planning
Contact: Suzanne Bassinger, 970‑416‑4340, sbassinger@fcgov.com
1. The North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization (NFRMPO) 2013 Bicycle
Plan identifies a future regional trail corridor parallel to the Box Elder Creek on the east
side of I‑25. The Bicycle Plan is available at:
https://nfrmpo.org/wp‑content/uploads/2013‑bicycle‑plan.pdf. The Colorado State Parks
recognizes this corridor as the western leg of the Front Range Trail in the NFRMPO
region. The completed corridor would connect to the Box Elder trail located on the west
side of I‑25 and thereafter heading south to connect to the Poudre Trail. The trail is
recognized by the Colorado State Parks to terminate in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Response: Trail connections are included in the ODP.
2. The development of the site will be required to provide a Public Access and Trail
Easement to connect to the future Box Elder Creek paved multi‑use trail, located in the
future Fox Grove development to the north. Alignment of the trail to provide access to
the future Poudre School District site and Prospect Road should be included. Park Planning and
Development is available to work with the applicant to locate a suitable alignment and trail location. Response: Trail connections are included in the ODP.
3. A Public Access and Trail Easement of a minimum of 50 feet wide will be required to
accommodate the future construction of a regional multi‑use paved trail. Response: Trail connections are included.
4. The City of Fort Collins Land Use Code Section 3.4.8 Parks and Trails addresses
compliance with the Parks and Recreation Policy Plan (Master Plan). The Master Plan
indicates the general location of all parks and regional recreational trails. Parcels
adjacent to or including facilities indicated in the Master Plan may be required to
provide area for development of these facilities. Response: Acknowledged
5. The 2013 Paved Recreational Trail Master Plan (Trail Master Plan) was adopted by City
Council and provides conceptual locations and general trail design guidelines for future
regional recreational trails. The Trail Master Plan is available at
https://www.fcgov.com/parkplanning/plans‑and‑policies. Response: Acknowledged
6. The Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (“LCUASS”), Chapter 16 Pedestrian
Facilities and Chapter 17 Bicycle Facilities provide additional design guidelines for
multi‑use regional recreational trails. Response: Acknowledged
7. Recreational trails do not function as widened sidewalks adjacent or within street rights‑of‑way. Response: Acknowledged
8. The trail easement may co‑exist within a Natural Habitat Buffer Zone if approval is
obtained from Environmental Planning. Response: Acknowledged
9. A trail easement may not be located within a ditch easement unless the applicant
provides written approval for the trail easement within the ditch easement from the ditch
company. The paved trail surface cannot function as a ditch access road if heavy
equipment will use or cross the trail to maintain the ditch. Response: Acknowledged
10. Local street at grade intersections with a recreational trail are to be avoided. When
necessary, the location of a future recreational trail at‑grade crossing must be
coordinated with Traffic Operations. Response: Acknowledged
11. The future trail alignment cannot be used to provide internal pedestrian circulation and
cannot provide direct access to buildings. Internal access to the recreational trail from
the internal bike/pedestrian system should be provided at limited and defined access points. Response: Acknowledged
12. Grade separated crossings of arterial roadways and major collectors are required
(LUCASS Chapter 17.3) and additional easement area for underpass/overpass
approaches may be required in locations of potential grade separated crossings for the trail. Response: Acknowledged
13. Grading within the designated recreational trail easement should be completed along
with overall site grading. Plans must indicate that the final grade within the easement
can provide a trail alignment that meets the American Disabilities Act (ADA) standards
for cross slopes between 1‑2% and a maximum centerline profile grade of 5%.
Construction documents should
include trail profiles and cross sections to demonstrate the ability to meet ADA standards. Response: Grading will be provided during Project Development Plan. Hard cover trails will
be graded to meet ADA standards.
14. Landscaping within the recreational trail easement shall be provided in accordance with
all applicable City codes, and will remain the responsibility of the underlying landowner.
Landscaping must provide acceptable clearances from the trail surfaces as specified in
the Trail Master Plan. Spray irrigation, if required, shall be designed and maintained to avoid spray on the trail. Response: Acknowledged
Department: Fire Authority
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970‑416‑2869, jlynxwiler@poudre‑fire.org
1. Poudre Fire Authority has no comment regarding amending the overall Prospect & I‑25
Corridor ODP. Subsequent development of the area shall be subject to current
requirements of the adopted version of the International Fire Code at time of construction. Response: Acknowledged
Department: Building Code Review
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970‑416‑2341, rhovland@fcgov.com
No comments Response: Acknowledged
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970‑221‑6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
1. We have no comments at this time but will need to see any future submittals. Response: Acknowledged