HomeMy WebLinkAboutNEC LAKE AND SHIELDS - FDP190008 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
October 26, 2018
Cathy Mathis
TB Group
444 Mountain Ave.
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: NEC Lake and Shields, PDP180012, Round Number 2
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Development Review Coordinator, Todd Sullivan, at 970-221-6695 or tsullivan@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR HEARING, Site Plan: There is one parking space in the NW corner of the
lot that does not meet the 2-foot overhang requirements without encroachment
into the sidewalk.
RESPONSE: The walk has been adjusted.
Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR HEARING, Landscape Plan/Civil Plans: For the walls – the civil plans
reference the landscape plans, and the landscape plans reference the civil
plans for construction and material information. Different materials are indicated
on both plans. Please update the plans.
RESPONSE: Revised. The landscape plan should have the correct detail and label and references on the
civil plans have been removed.
Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR HEARING, Landscape Plan: Section shown on sheet 2 shows a 7’
dimension. I believe this would be around 6 feet. Please update this dimension.
RESPONSE: Revised to 6’.
Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
2
FOR HEARING, James Court is misspelled on the landscape plans.
RESPONSE: Revised.
Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Landscape Plan/Civil Plans: Some portions of the playground area
are at 10 to 12 percent grade. Is this useable for the kids, and also will there be
issues with the playground mulch staying evenly in place at this grade.
RESPONSE Slopes have been revised to be more kid friendly. A landscaping wall was required to make
this possible.
Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Landscape Plan: At the NW corner of the site along the sidewalk,
lower plantings along the interior edge of the sidewalk are preferred, in the 2’ to
3’ tall range so that the corner is more open visually and to provide greater
visibility around the sidewalk.
RESPONSE: Shrubs were pulled back towards the existing evergreen trees. The plant selection along
the edge has been revised to plants that do not get as tall.
Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Landscape Plan: staff is concerned that some of the plant material
will crowd the sidewalk long term. Along the interior edge of the sidewalk, if the
plants symbols can be pushed away from the sidewalk 12 inches this will work
better long term with more open mulch space along the sidewalk edge.
RESPONSE: Revised. A foot of clear space has been provided along the walk.
Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Landscape Plan: Text on the sheet one is too small, less than 1/8”,
3/32 is recommended.
RESPONSE: Revised.
Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Landscape Plan: With the final plans details on sheet two, clarify
with the construction details and labeling that the sod and mulch edges will be
not more than 1 inch below the finish surface of the sidewalk. that along the
sidewalk.
RESPONSE: Please see #14 under general notes. A note has also been added to the shrub detail.
Comment Number: 43 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Landscape Plan: Something to think about for final, the north shrub
beds along the north pond, these might be better as small river cobble due to
the slope in this area so that the mulch does not wash out.
RESPONSE: The cedar mulch has been changed to rock mulch.
Comment Number: 44 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Landscape Plan: Walls shown on the plans – provide a final
construction detail for these walls that indicate the general specifications. See
hardscape design details section in the submittal application requirements.
Show how a block wall system can work when both sides of the wall are visible.
Show the proposed wall pattern and finish texture/treatment. Coordination with
the architecture is recommended. Remove references to civil plans if no civil
information is provided. Final manufacturer specification can be or approved
equal.
3
RESPONSE: A detail of the double-sided retaining/seat wall has been added to Sheet 2 of the landscape
plan. The type and color selection has been coordinated with the Architect.
Comment Number: 45 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Architectural Plans: Please add general specification information
for the synthetic stone.
RESPONSE: A specification for the synthetic stone manufacturer, model and color has been added to the
elevations.
Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 10/17/2018
FOR FINAL, Lighting plans and site plan: Lighting plans and specs look great,
thank you. We would like to ensure that the overall pole heights are minimized
and that the installation is coordinated. Sometimes we see that the concrete
base that is installed is very tall, and this raises the overall height of the
luminaire. For the parking lot lighting, please clarify on the plans how the
luminaire, pole and base is positioned in relation to the ground. Only the top of
the fixture and pole is shown. Ideally, the site plan should reference a detail that
shows generally how the parking light fixtures should be installed, with a not to
exceed dimension for the base and the fixture that relates to the photometrics.
RESPONSE: Light pole heights as well as the fixture heights on indicated on the Luminaire Locations
Schedule on sheet PM.2 and called out on the Site Photometric Plans. A detail for the light pole based has
also been added.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Spencer Smith, 970-221-6603, smsmith@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/19/2018: FOR FINAL:
Thank you for adding the proposed easements. Please make sure that all
easements (existing and proposed) are labeled/called out on the plat and all
plans.
RESPONSE: Easements called out on plans.
09/10/2018: Existing drainage infrastructure may need to have drainage
easements dedicated, since the property is being subdivided and multiple lots
will be draining into storm sewer, swales, etc.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/19/2018: FOR FINAL:
Thank you for including typical street sections. See redlines for some minor
comments that should be addressed during the final review period.
RESPONSE: Redlines have been addressed
09/10/2018: Include typical street sections for all adjacent roadways, that show
interim and ultimate conditions, as applicable.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/19/2018: INFORMATION ONLY:
I didn't realize that I had never sent over the redlines from the first submittal
review. There will be redlines for this submittal as well. If for some reason they
are not included with the packet of comments and other redlines from the
Development Review Coordinator, please let me know.
4
09/10/2018: See sheet C0.01 for various comments on notes.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/19/2018: FOR FINAL:
It does not look like the proposed lots are labeled on the plans.
RESPONSE: Lot numbers are now on plans.
09/10/2018: Label all proposed lots and adjacent properties. Show all
proposed and existing lot and property lines as well.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/19/2018: FOR FINAL:
The utility plans look much better. The site plan still has some issue with the
hatching scale or something.
RESPONSE: Thank you.
09/10/2018: Depict existing infrastructure (walks and ramps especially) more
clearly on plans. It is a bit hard to follow how the proposed walks tie into existing
concrete and ramps at James Ct./Shields and Lake/Shields. Also, it needs to
be more clear that the existing walk along Shields will remain and how that ties
into proposed improvements.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/19/2018: FOR FINAL:
Just following up on this comment since there was no written response. If there
will be adjustments to the existing striping, that can be shown on the final utility
plans.
RESPONSE: The TIS indicates that changes to signal timing could be made to improve and shorten the
queue in addition to potential stripping changes. We look forward to working with staff to determine the best
option.
09/10/2018: The TIS identifies a deficiency in the length of the westbound left
turn lane on Lake St. There may be an opportunity to lengthen the striped turn
lane to get closer to the required length.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 09/11/2018
10/19/2018: FOR INFORMATION:
Please see Engineering redlines (Utility Plan, Site Plan and Plat) for additional
comments.
09/11/2018: Please see Engineering redlines (Utility Plan and Plat) for
additional comments.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 09/12/2018
09/12/2018: FOR FINAL:
We will need to see spot elevations (existing and proposed) and slope labels
on all pedestrian ramps. This is a request for all projects, from our Engineering
inspection staff.
RESPONSE: Slope labels have been added
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR HEARING:
The ramp configurations at the intersections of Shields/Lake and
Shields/James Ct. will need to be looked at in more detail prior to PDP hearing.
5
We want to ensure that the configuration accommodates the raised bike lane and
sidewalk. We don't necessarily need to have all the details worked out, but
would like to at least have an agreement on the way that we will address these
corners. See redlines for more details and an example of one solution that was
used for Suniga
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR FINAL:
City Street Maintenance has requested that the proposed detached walk be
maintained by the property owner (particularly for snow removal). This would be
addressed in the DA for the project.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR FINAL:
There appears to be a sidewalk/tree conflict near the Shields/James Ct.
intersection. I believe Forestry is providing comments regarding this as well.
RESPONSE: Forestry’s comments have been addressed
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR FINAL:
There is one parking space that may still have a conflict with the detached walk.
Please adjust site to eliminate the vehicle overhang conflict.
RESPONSE: Sidewalk and parking stall conflict has been revised.
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR FINAL:
There is a discrepancy in the proposed utility easement along Lake St. between
the plat and utility and site plans. See redlines.
RESPONSE: Easement now extends all the way to the property line.
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR FINAL:
The sidewalk that jogs around the proposed undergrounded electrical switch
cabinet vault needs to be contained in an access easement.
RESPONSE: Vault is within the right of way
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR FINAL:
The proposed electrical vault in the Lake St. ROW may need an encroachment
easement from Engineering. I am following up with Engineering Inspections
staff to confirm.
RESPONSE: Vault is within the right of way.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR HEARING:
We don't want stormwater runoff concentrating against the edge of the
proposed detach walk along Shields St. (where the existing berm impedes
flow). I'd like to see an exhibit and discuss with Engineering consultant to see
how this can or is being addressed.
RESPONSE: A swale has been added with inlets to capture this trickle flow.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR FINAL:
6
Please ensure that proposed landscaping does not interfere with intersection
sight distance.
RESPONSE: Revised.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/24/2018: FOR FINAL
We'll get you an approximate amount in the next few weeks.
09/10/2018: The project will need to contribute a proportional share of funding
for the NB right turn lane at Lake and Shields.
RESPONSE: Thank you.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/24/2018: FOR INFORMATION
The comment response is that the driveway to the south was not surveyed, and
drawn in approximately. That is fine and no additional survey is needed. The
drives still appear to be offset. We can live with that if needed, but if it's easy,
aligned drives are more ideal.
RESPONSE: They are still slightly off center but we need all the space we can get to the west of our drive
isle for both rain gardens and our detention pond.
09/10/2018: Please align the access point with the driveway to the south.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018
10/24/2018: FOR FINAL
We'll need to take a look at the corner ramp design. Our typical design is to use
directional ramps, but we may need to refine that for the bikes. On the north
end, use a directional ramp to the north only (no crosswalk across Shields). On
the south end, perhaps some type of radial design would be best.
RESPONSE: We are tying into the back of the existing ramps at these locations. Are you proposing that
we redo these ramps entirely? We will continue to work with you to resolve this issue.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018
10/24/2018: FOR FINAL
Please take a look at the landscaping on the northwest corner of the lot. No tall
plants / grasses should be planted where they may impact sight distance for
vehicles on James Court to be able to see vehicles, bikes or peds on Shields.
RESPONSE: Revised.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018
10/24/2018: FOR FINAL
We'll need to review the striping along Lake to determine whether any changes
are warranted. We may also ask for some bike / ped markings on the multiple
walks / lanes.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/25/2018
10/25/2018: READY FOR HEARING
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 70-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com
Topic: General
7
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/11/2018
09/11/2018: Based upon the species listed in the seed mix included on
landscape plan - this is not considered a native grass seed mix. A list of
appropriate native seed mixes will be provided. Drill seed rate should be
minimum 15lbs/acre and double that for a broadcast application method.
RESPONSE: Revised seed mix was included with the 10.3.18 submittal.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/11/2018
09/11/2018: Environmental Planning is ready for Hearing. By Final Plan first
round all comments here should be addressed. Thank you.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Molly Roche, 224-616-1992, mroche@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/22/2018:
The following edits have not been incorporated into the most recent landscape
plan submittal:
Please update the following tree sizes and conditions on both the tree removal
plan and the existing tree schedule:
Tree # 1: Austrian Pine – 9.5”
Tree #11: Austrian Pine – 10.5”
Tree # 13: Hackberry – Fair Minus
Tree #15: Green Ash – 11.5”
RESPONSE: Revised.
09/10/2018:
There appear to be some discrepancies on sheet 2 between the tree inventory
and mitigation plan.
- The existing tree schedule shows tree #4 to removed, but the tree symbol
does not show removal.
RESPONSE: I have verified that both the label and symbol show that it will be removed.
- The existing tree schedule shows tree #11 to be retained, but the tree
symbol and plan shows the tree to be removed.
RESPONSE: The label has been revised to say To Be Removed.
- Please update the following tree sizes and conditions:
o Tree # 1: Austrian Pine ¿ 9.5¿
o Tree #11: Austrian Pine ¿ 10.5¿
o Tree # 13: Hackberry ¿ Fair Minus
o Tree #15: Green Ash ¿ 11.5¿
RESPONSE: Revised
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018:
PROVIDE REVISION FIRST ROUND FDP
In the plant list, please show 2.0” caliper size for (3) Shumard Oak 2.0” that are
not mitigation trees. Currently, only (3) mitigation tree sizes are shown.
RESPONSE: Added.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
8
10/23/2018:
PROVIDE REVISION FIRST ROUND FDP
The total number of trees on-site equals 64. The species diversity percentages
appear slightly off and, in some cases, exceed the maximum 15% of any one
species. For example, (10) Tannenbaum Mugo Pine and (10) Fastigiate
Norway Spruce are both 15.6% of the total diversity on site. Please adjust these
numbers.
RESPONSE: Revised.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018:
PROVIDE REVISION FIRST ROUND FDP
Trees #8, 9, and 14 are still shown on sheet 4 of the landscape plan. Please
remove these symbols.
RESPONSE: Revised.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018:
PROVIDE REVISION FIRST ROUND FDP
There are a few tree symbols that are difficult to see on the plans (see redlines).
Please darken the symbol.
RESPONSE: Revised.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/18:
PROVIDE REVISION FIRST ROUND FDP
With support from City Engineering and Traffic, please pinch the sidewalk to 7’
around the Bur Oak (tree #2) to provide additional space outside of the critical
root zone. This is a nice quality specimen and Forestry would like to see every
attempt made to preserve the root structure of this tree.
RESPONSE: Sidewalk is 7’ around the tree.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018:
UTILITY PLANS: PROVIDE REVISION FIRST ROUND PDP
On sheet C4 of the Utility Plans, please include the following details above each
tree/cross section: tree #, species, existing caliper and associated critical root
zone distance.
Tree # 2 Bur Oak: 13”; critical root zone: 6.5’
Tree #3 Honeylocust: 6”; critical root zone: 3’
Tree #5 Hackberry 8”; critical root zone: 4’
Tree #10 Hackberry 10.5”; critical root zone: 5.5’
RESPONSE: Tree sizes were added to cross sections
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/18:
PROVIDE REVISION FIRST ROUND PDP
According to Rob Irish in Light and Power, an off-site tree might be impacted by
the installation of an underground electrical vault. Please explore shifting the
vault to the east side of this tree to avoid severe root impacts.
RESPONSE: We are simply removing a vault and placing it directly back where it is. We will continue to
work with City light and Power to see if there are other options.
9
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/05/2018
10/23/2018: Information Only:
09/05/2018: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line
diagram will need to be submitted to Light & Power Engineering for all
proposed commercial buildings and multi-family (commercial) buildings larger
than a duplex or greater than 200amps. A link to the C-1 form is below:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo
rms-guidelines-regulations
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/05/2018
10/23/2018: Information Only:
09/05/2018: Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges, and any system
modification charges necessary will apply to this development. Please contact
Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970-221-6700 or
ElectricProjectEngineering@fcgov.com. Please reference our Electric Service
Standards, development charges and fee estimator at the following link:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/05/2018
10/23/2018: For Final: New transformer location shown does not appear to
have enough clearance between the curb and the existing tree. Also, the
transformer and the electric line are not meeting the 10' clearance requirement
from storm line B. Maybe the transformer could be placed on the East side of
the existing tree.
RESPONSE: Transformer has been moved to south side of driveay entrance.
09/05/2018: Proposed transformer location appears to be out of access
according to Light & Powers Electric Service Standards.
Transformer locations need to be within 10¿ of an asphalt surface accessible
by a line truck. A minimum clearance of 8¿ must be maintained in front of the
transformer doors and a minimum of 3¿ on the sides Transformer and meter
locations will need to be coordinated with Light & Power Engineering. Certain
building materials and or building design may require more clearance. Please
adhere to all clearance requirements in the Electric Service Standards at the
following link.
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo
rms-guidelines-regulations
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/15/2018
10/15/2018: For Final:
Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials
have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City
Criteria.
RESPONSE: I apologize Jesse but I never got the redlines and comments from your previous submittal. I
10
will make all necessary adjustments prior to next submittal.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/15/2018
10/15/2018: For Final:
Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report as the recently received materials
has comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria.
RESPONSE: SWMP resubmitted but see comment above.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/15/2018
10/15/2018: For Development Agreement:
Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation based upon
the latest Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials has
comments and redlines or may have Erosion Control Plan changes which
require a recalculation of the Escrow in order to meet City Criteria.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/23/2018: FINAL: reminder comment.
09/10/2018: Drainage Easements are required for the detention ponds and
rain gardens.
RESPONSE: Easements have been dedicated
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FINAL: More separation is required for the transformer and the
storm sewer. Please provide 6 to 10 feet separation.
RESPONSE: Storm line was moved and separation has been achieved.
Department: PFA
Contact: Andrew Rosen, 970-416-2599, arosen@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/07/2018
10-19-2018 UPDATE
>The requested Autoturn exhibit is required for the next round.
>The EAE is noted on the Plat and is an appropriate location
>The FDC is noted in an appropriate location on the east elevation.
>The Fire Lane No Parking signs are shown in appropriate locations
>It is understood that GIS may not have generated the appropriate address
number but the locations of the addressing and wayfinding signage will be
required at FDP
RESPONSE: This was completed prior to hearing.
9-12-2018 Staff review update
EAE will be shown in its entirety at next submission enabling access to the
hydrant and 150ft access requirement
An Autoturn exhibit will be used to verify entry from Lake Street.
Addressing will be provided at FDP for approval by PFA
11
09/07/2018:
>At the city meeting the project team stated this would be designed as an E
Occupancy. Where the required facility room exits open into fenced playground
areas, gates with appropriate egress hardware will be provided where required.
>The required Fire Lane parallel to the south side of the facility will be designed
to provide the 150ft access to the northwest corner of the building.
>The fire lane will be extended to the north to ensure access to the hydrant at
the entrance from James Ct.
>The project team stated that the facility may be addressed from Lake Street. If
this is the case then in order to assist prompt emergency response the full
address shall be clearly visible on the south elevation of the building in 12"
letters and numerals.
>The full address, including street name shall be attached to the west elevation
in no less than 8" tall numerals
>The FDC is noted at the north part of the east elevation.
>Should there be any cooking activities that produce grease laden vapors then
an approved Class 1 Hood will be required.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/07/2018
09/07/2018:
ADDRESSING/WAYFINDING
To assist with prompt emergency response the address will be on the west and
east elevations of this building since it is addressed off Shields but accessed
from Lake Street. Wayfinding signage, both number and street name, will be
required at the Lake St entrance to indicate correct access. Code language
follows:
>IFC 505.1.8: Buildings that are addressed on one street, but are accessible
from other streets, shall have the address numbers AND STREET NAME on
each side that is accessible form another street.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/22/2018: FOR APPROVAL:
A complete review of all plans will be done at FDP.
RESPONSE: Thank you.
09/10/2018: A complete review of all plans will be done at FDP.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/10/2018
10/22/2018: FOR APPROVAL:
Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree
with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not
made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response
letter.
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.
09/10/2018: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you
12
disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections
were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in
response letter.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018: FOR APPROVAL:
Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot corners
shown. These could be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com
RESPONSE: Acknowledged.