The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTAFT PLACE - FDP180028 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview March 08, 2019 Courtney Lockwood Lockwood Architects, inc 415 E Pitkin St Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Taft Place, FDP180028, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane, at 970-224-6119 or tbeane@fcgov.com. UComment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, Upwray@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 FOR FINAL: Ready for mylars. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501, Ukandrews@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 03/04/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please provide a recorded copy of the offsite grading easements prior to final plan approval.The offsite easements are in process. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 03/04/2019: FOR APPROVAL/REPEAT COMMENT: The flowline profiles on both Harmony and Taft still are not showing how the grades tie into existing – please provide so that the limits of the grading easement can be verified.See revised profiles. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 2 03/04/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Thank you for adjusting for ADA and flowline standards – there is one area that still needs some clarification: on the profile for Taft, at ST 0+76.84, the flowline appears to diverge as if around a corner, however on the plan view this location is only halfway between CR38E and the new private drive. Please clarify what’s happening in this area and note that 0.5% to 1% does exceed the max grade break of 0.4%. Can an additional grade break be provided to smooth this out? Please reach out if this would cause adverse effects elsewhere in the design, etc.That was an error and has been corrected. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 03/04/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Thank you for providing the ultimate striping exhibit as well as the cross sections on the cover; however, there appears to be a disconnect between the two – some of the widths shown on the striping plan don’t match what’s being shown as the ultimate cross section. The ROW dedication appears to be correct, as we had worked out from the beginning, but the exhibit and sections are showing different things – please clarify.See revised typical ultimate cross sections on the cover. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 03/04/2019: INFORMATION ONLY: The City Engineering department is currently reviewing ramp details, particularly for the use of truncated domes. Although domes are included in the driveway detail, staff does not believe that the vehicular crossings at this location will be frequent enough to require the use of truncated domes. These can be removed from the driveway crossings. Also, the CR38E ramp flares can be changed to curb to better direct pedestrians across the driveway.The domes have been removed and the flares have been modified. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 03/04/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Thank you for adding the driveway variance to Note 48, please also add the utility easement reduction to the approved variances list – I apologize for not listing out the variances in my comment last round, this should be the last addition to this note that I am aware of.This variance has been added. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 03/04/2019: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Staff is drafting the DA and will be sending a draft for developer review as soon as possible.Thank you, we will look for this. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 03/05/2019 03/04/2019: DCP: Please feel free to send the public improvements cost estimate when you feel confident about quantities, even ahead of DCP application if desired – this will give us our final security amount. For more information on the DCP and what steps need to be completed prior to application, please see: 30TUhttps://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.phpUThis cost estimate is in progress & will send when 30T complete. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General 3 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2018 03/05/2019: It does not appear that the redlines were addressed. They included pavement markings on both CR 28E and Taft, and conduit needs for the signal. These need to be addressed before mylars. 12/17/2018: final redlines for signing, striping and signal work have been forwarded with the review letter on Friday.These comments on the redlines have been incorporated into the revised drawings. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/01/2019 03/01/2019: The StromTech notes on sheet 6 are for a different size of chamber and not for the SC160LP. Please revise.The notes have been updated to reflect the SC160LP chambers. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/01/2019 03/01/2019: The Utility Plan references the StormTech design on Sheet 5. This should be Sheet 6.This reference has been corrected. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/01/2019 03/01/2019: On Sheet 19, The weir elevation for the water quality volume is incorrect. It looks like it should be 1 foot higher. Please revise.The weir elevation has been corrected. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/01/2019 03/01/2019: There are some conflicts with shade trees and storm sewer. 10 feet is the standard for separation. Please try to maximize the distances close to this standard.The storm layout has been modified to maximize the clearance to trees, etc. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 03/01/2019 03/01/2019: Please label Storm 4 & 5 lines as RCP Class III.A note was added to the storm profile Sheet that all RCP shall be Class III. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2019 03/01/2019: Please relocate the cleanout for the sanitary sewer service at least 2 feet from the sidewalk.The sewer cleanout has been moved. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, 224-616-1992, mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/05/2019 11 3/5/19: FOR APPROVAL Wes Lamarque in Stormwater/Waste Water Utilities informed me that the northern most Shumard Oak is too close to the Storm Drain. Please allow 10 ft between the tree and this utility. Include site distance triangle at this corner to 4 ensure that the canopy shade tree does not encroach with its adjusted location. The Strom Drain has been moved to provide the 10’ separation. In the meeting, traffic confirmed that this tree would not interfere with Sight Distance. Department: PFA Contact: Andrew Rosen, 970-416-2599, arosen@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/13/2018 02/26/2019: >Please confirm the location of the FDC in the south-west corner of the building and show on the Utility or Site plan.The location of the FDC is shown on the utility plan. >The areas for the address are noted on the elevations. Please note that the exact address notated will depend on the final address allocated by GIS. >All other PFA comments have been resolved. When you submit for your building permit though the City of Fort Collins please be advised Poudre Fire Authority is an additional and separate submittal. The link for Poudre Fire Authority’s plan review application can be found at 30Thttps://www.poudre-fire.org/online-services/contractors-plan-reviews-and-permits/new-building-plan-review -application30T Department: Internal Services Contact: Jonathon Nagel, 970-416-2701, jnagel@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/27/2019 02/27/2019: INFORMATION ONLY: Please note because the trash enclosure is over 6' tall it will require a separate building permit. Noted, thank you. Department: Light And Power Contact: Luke Unruh, 9704162724, lunruh@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/18/2018 12/18/2018: Informational; Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges, and any necessary system modification charges will apply at owners expense. Please see the Electric Estimating Calculator and Electric Construction Policies, Practices & Procedures at the following link: 30Thttp://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers30T Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/04/2019 03/04/2019: Before Construction; A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one-line diagram will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering for review. A link to the C-1 form is below: 30Thttp://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- 30Tforms-guidelines-regulations30T Department: Environmental Planning 5 Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/15/2018 12/15/2018: Ready for mylar. No further comments. Thank you. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2019 03/01/2019: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Noted, thank you. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/14/2018 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL-UPDATED: There are spelling issues. See redlines.The spelling has been corrected. 12/14/2018: FOR APPROVAL: The Benchmark Statement has been revised. The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January 1, 2015, all projects are required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 - X.XX¿. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/14/2018 6 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL-UNRESOLVED: There are line over text issues. See redlines.Drawings have been revised. 12/14/2018: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/14/2018 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL-UNRESOLVED: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines.Drawings have been revised. 12/14/2018: FOR APPROVAL: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 03/07/2019 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are sheet numbering issues. See redlines.Drawings have been revised. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/14/2018 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL-UPDATED: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Drawings have been revised. 12/14/2018: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Drawings have been revised. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 03/07/2019 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Drawings have been revised. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/14/2018 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL-UPDATED: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Drawings have been revised. 12/14/2018: FOR APPROVAL: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Drawings have been revised. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/14/2018 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL-UNRESOLVED: Some of the bearings shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Drawings have been revised. 12/14/2018: FOR APPROVAL: Some of the bearings & distances shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. 7 Drawings have been revised. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/14/2018 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL-UPDATED: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Drawings have been revised. 12/14/2018: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Drawings have been revised. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 03/07/2019 03/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There is a note that duplicates notes near it. Is this needed? See redlines. This note has been removed. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Terry Farrill- 970-226-3104 ext 104, tfarrill@fclwd.com, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/20/2018 12/20/2018: The existing 3/4 inch water tap is classified as single family residential. To reclassify to multi-family the tap must be under one ownership and all outside irrigation must be by a separate source. The tap fee would be $32,412.60 for a 1 1/2 inch tap to serve the four dwelling units as multi-family. The existing tap would have to be abandoned at the main and a new 1 1/2 tap installed for the proposed configuration. Tap will be under one ownership. How will the landscape be irrigated? The irrigation line will be off the commercial tap. A reduced pressure principle device is required on the domestic taps. See notes on utility sheet. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.