Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS - PDP - PDP180015 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview November 02, 2018 Deanne Frederickson Baseline Engineering 4007 S Lincoln Suite 405 Loveland, CO 80538 RE: Allied Building Products, PDP180015, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane, at 970-224-6119 or tbeane@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Kai Kleer, 970-416-4284, kkleer@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: Chainlink fence is not permitted along Midpoint Drive. The plan must use architectural elements such as brick or stone columns. An example of a fence that meets the code is a recently approved and built storage facility across the street from the site. A detail view and specifications of the of the fence and columns will be required as part of the plan set. Code reference - 3.8.11 Response: The chain-link fence has been removed from the design in the plan and has been replaced with a cast iron fence and brick columns. Specifications and details are provided. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: The proposed fence on the west site of building should be removed. The rear wall of the building acts as security for the site making the fence redundant. Any fending that is needed can be extended from the southeast corner of the building. More information is needed on the fencing height and material. Please consider a welded wire fence. Response: Fencing has been removed from the west side of the building. A cast iron fence with brick columns has replaced the chain-link fence. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: Why are trees on west side of site being removed? Work with forestry to assign mitigation values on site and provide replacement trees in same approximate location as ones that are proposed to be removed. A significant tree that is removed shall be replaced with not less than one (1) or more than six (6) replacement trees. Code reference - 3.2.1(F)(1) Response: We have worked with forestry to determine the condition of the existing trees. They were determined to be diseased and in poor to fair condition. Replacement trees have been identified on the plan as those trees with a 3” caliper per code. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: There is a note that all ash trees to remain shall receive EAB treatment … However, all of them are indicated to be removed is there an ash tree on the site that will remain? Response: Notes have been updated. The note about EAB treatment has been removed. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: Landscaping of north and west side of building is needed. Planting bed must be a minimum of 5 feet wide placed directly along at least 50% of the wall. Code reference 3.2.1(E)(2)(e). Response: Landscaping added to north of building to account for screening and a minimum 5 foot wide planting bed. Landscaping immediately along the west side of the building isn’t possible due to a gas line that runs the length of the building from 1.5 feet to 6 feet from the edge of the building (it tapers from one end to the other). Shade trees and ornamental grasses that will grow to 3-5 feet along the Keystone wall have been designed to accommodate requirement. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 INFORMATION ONLY (UPDATED 11/1/2018): An irrigation plan will be required for the site at time of building permit. Code Reference - 3.2.1(3)(b)(1) and 3.2.1(J)(2) Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: A connecting walkway to the main building’s existing walkway is required from Midpoint Drive. Please show on plan how this will extend through the west side of the site, cross the drive aisle and connect into the existing walkway. Code reference 4.27(E)(2) Response: A walkway connecting the buildings existing walkway from Midpoint Drive has been added to the plan. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: The proposed asphalt loading area must be a minimum of 20 feet from Midpoint right of way. Code reference - 3.5.1(I) Response: Proposed asphalt landing has been updated to reflect the 20 foot minimum requirement. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: The storage, truck parking and any use that will be taking place on the 'asphalt loading area' must be 100% screened from public view. This will require the additional landscaping on the area fronting Midpoint Drive. Please add evergreen material to bolster year-round screening. Code reference - 3.5.1(I) Response: Evergreen trees have been added to increase the screening along Midpoint Drive. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018: One of the primary purposes of our landscape regulations is to create a tree canopy cover with "full tree stocking" in all areas within 50ft of any building or structure. Please provide informal groupings of trees dispersed through both the west, south, and southeast portions of the site at a minimum of 20ft and max of 40ft of separation. Code reference - 3.2.1(H)(3) and 3.2.1(D)(1) (c) Response: Trees have been added to the west and south of the building to satisfy the “full tree stocking” requirement. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 BEFORE HEARING: Please provide material and color details for what is being proposed for the building. Is the base CMU? What color will the walls and roof be? Response: The walls and roof of the building will be Butler made metal panels. The walls will be a Shadowall panel in an ivory or beige color (https://butlerpartsonline.com/product-category/wall-systems/shadowall-system/). The roof will be the Butlerib II panel in a white or off-white (ivory) color (https://butlerpartsonline.com/product-category/roof-systems/butlerib-ii-roof-system/). Stone accents will be used from the Allied Building Projects catalogue (https://alliedbuilding.com/productDetail/CORONADO_OLD_COUNTRY_LEDGE_FLAT_15SQUARE_FEET_BOX_MONARCH_431554 05). Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: For LID: please note that for a "grass swale" to meet the LID requirement, it will need to be designed and constructed with a rain garden sub-section. Also, you need to show me where this grass swale is located - I don’t see a swale anywhere on these plans. Response: The swale is now shown with a line type added to the legend. The grass swale will have an underdrain with a rain garden sub-section. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: For LID: please note that for a "grass buffer" to meet the LID requirement you will need to adhere to the vegetated buffer standards in the new criteria manual. Based on the existing site soils, this doesn't seem like it’s going to work for a grass or vegetated buffer. Response: The ~1’ high retaining wall will have an underdrain and “rain garden” soil section and amended well drained soils in vegetation areas. The underdrain ties into the underdrain under the grass swale, these perforated underdrains tie into a non-perforated underdrain and discharge into the water quality pond to the west. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: The entire area east and south of the drive aisle looks to drain offsite to the property to the east. Per the previous drainage report, this entire lot is to drain to the west and into the existing water quality pond, but this doesn’t appear to be what you are showing. You can’t show runoff toward the easterly property unless their stormwater design has already accounted for this. Also, I’m struggling to understand why you raised the site by ~5’ and still don’t show a drainage swale routing flow back to the south and west like it was previously assumed to do in the Centerpoint drainage analysis. Response: The natural slope of the lot is to the east. Fill is added to force drainage west, to the WQ pond. The east and south pervious areas historically drain to the east and then south along the property line. The proposed pervious area is 0.366 acres versus the historic area of approximately 1.420 acres. A table of runoff comparisons has been added to the Drainage Report. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR FINAL: The outlet structure detail is hard to follow. The detail needs to more clearly illustrate the existing outlet box and how its being modified. Also, the WQCV perforation holes are incorrect. See the note in the redlines. Response: A hatch has been added designating the removal area of the face of the outlet box and of the existing WQC plate. The WQCV perforation hole size calcs have been checked and corrected. The existing holes are slightly larger 11/16” vs 5/8” of what was calc’ed and it seems preferable to modify the existing plate that fits and functions than fabricate a new one unless the existing plate is damaged and no longer usable. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR FINAL: The Bioretention detail is very blurry. Please include a readable version of this detail or the new bioretention detail. Response: The detail was downloaded from the City website, another detail has been downloaded and inserted into the detail sheet. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: Drainage Report: On page 5 of the report you state that there are no deviations from criteria, but it looks like there is a large portion of the site that is not draining toward the WQC pond or receiving any LID treatment. This would be a deviation from criteria. Perhaps we should have a meeting to discuss. Response: The section has been re-written, as we discussed the runoff to the south is greatly reduced and it is not practical to import enough fill to drain the pervious areas to the WQ pond. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: On page 9, it is stated that a minimum of 50% of the impervious area must be treated using LID systems; however, this is the requirement if you are using pavers. The requirement without pavers is that 75% of any newly added or modified impervious areas need to be treated using an LID system. The remaining areas of the site, pervious or impervious, are required to be treated using a standard water quality treatment. Response: This section has been corrected to state that 75% of the impervious area must be treated using LID systems. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: The report does not appear to show that the developed runoff from this development project is equal to or less than the assumed runoff shown in the Centerpoint Plaza drainage analysis. This comparison needs to be clearly shown to verify that no detention is needed. Response: A comparison table has been added to section III.E. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: The runoff coefficients shown in the rational method analysis are shown to be greater than 1 when multiplied by the Cf factor. This is incorrect. Please update calculations accordingly. Response: The rational method analysis has been corrected. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR FINAL: There is an existing water service to the existing building on this lot. The existing curb stop, meter and service line should be shown on the plans to verify that this line is not going to be disturbed with the proposed improvements to the front of the lot. Response: This water service was not found when locates were called in. A note has been added to the utility sheet to locate and pothole the meter and service line before the start of construction. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR FINAL: There is an existing future fire service line stubbed into this lot. If this future fire service stub is not to be used with this improvement project, it is required to be abandoned at the main. A note shall be added to the plans that states this. Response: This fire service line stub has been shown on the plans in the approximate location of a valve located by survey. A note has been added to abandon the stub at the water main. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/30/2018 10/30/2018: FOR FINAL: There is a utility easement across the middle of the lot that you show to be vacated. What is this utility easement for? does it currently house an existing utility? We will not allow for the vacation of this easement unless it can be verified that its not needed. Response: The existing utility easement will not be abandoned unless it is determined that the water service to Lot 3 was installed elsewhere. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018 10/24/2018: For Final: Please resubmit Erosion Control Plans based upon redlines to meet City Criteria. Response: The redline comments have been addressed and the Erosion Control Plan has been updated. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018 10/24/2018: For Final: Please resubmit Erosion Control Report based upon redlines to meet City Criteria. Response: The redlines comments have been addressed and the report has been updated. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018 10/24/2018: Development Agreement: Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation based upon changes to the Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria. Response: The Erosion Control Escrow/Security Calculation has been updated in the revised report. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501, kandrews@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: On Utility Plan Sheet C3, the property line and existing ROW labels don't seem to be pointing to the same place - please clarify. Response: Leaders have been corrected as necessary. The property line label was pointing to the old property line which has been previously vacated and is now turned off. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: The minimum drive approach width for driveways in the ROW to private property is 24' - please increase driveway width 2 feet to meet the standard. Response: The driveway width label did not include gutter width, this has now been included for the corrected width of 24 feet. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: BY HEARING: For utility plan details: please remove the intersection/cross pan detail and replace with LCUASS Drawing 707.1, standard drive approach detail. Response: Detail D-14 was replaced with Detail 707.1. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please include all applicable pedestrian ramp construction details. Response: Details have been added. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please include spot elevations where the sidewalk ties into the existing and at the tops and bottoms of any new ped ramps. Response: Spot elevations have been added. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please add the following note to the utility plan: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City of Fort Collins Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with city street repair standards. Response: The note has been added. The Site Plan has been combined with the Utility Plan. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: FOR APPROVAL: No new plat was submitted, Engineering understands that there will be 2 easement vacations and 1 easement dedication by separate document. Please note that these will be subject to separate TDRF fees and will need to be completed prior to Final Plan approval. Please see the following website for more information on the dedication/vacation by separate document process: https://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php Response: Comment noted. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: INFORMATION ONLY: Please note that there may be additional final plan level comments for this project with the final plan (FDP) submittal. Response: Comment noted. Department: PFA Contact: Andrew Rosen, 970-416-2599, arosen@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/25/2018 10/25/2018: ACCESS >Access is required to within 150ft of all exterior portions of the perimeter of this building. Midpoint drive is a collector street so can be used for this measurement. However, this planned building is approximately 90ft out of compliance for this requirement therefore a fire lane will be established on the property to provide this required access. The driveway to the existing building would be appropriate if it complies with the fire lane specifications shown in comment 2 and shown on the Plat as an Emergency Access Easement (EAE) or dedicated by separate legal document. >This proposed storage building development triggers a re-evaluation of the fire access for the existing building which is also required to be in compliance with the 150ft access. If there is no pre-existing EAE for the existing building, then one shall be established to provide access to within 150ft of all external portions of that building. Response: An EAE will be dedicated by separate legal document prior to approval of the FDP. Response: There are existing easements around the building on Lot 3. An all-weather surface access will be provided to connect the northeast corner of Lot 3 to the new access for this project. Additional EAE’s will be provided as necessary. No Parking Fire Lane signs will be added to the access as well. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/25/2018 10/25/2018: FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS >The Access Easement shown on the site plan should be shown as an Emergency Access Easement. >There are no signs shown on the Site Plan but it is understood signage will be provided by FDP. Prior response: Requirements and signage noted. This will be finalized once the site plan has been fixed by City and Owner review. An Easement is shown access to access, signs are noted on the site plan. Response: EAE will be provided by FDP, signs (5) are shown on the Site Plan. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/25/2018 10/25/2018: FIRE SPRINKLER >Any building greater than 5,000sqft is required to be designed with an approved fire sprinkler system or method of fire containment. This storage building is 6,600sqft but has a fully open side to the east. >A fire sprinkler or plan for fire containment will not be required at this time. >Should this building be redesigned to fully or partly enclose the east side, then this will trigger the requirement for a sprinkler system or fire containment. Response: Comment noted. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/25/2018 10/25/2018: GATES The gate shown at the Northeast corner shall be fitted with a Knox Key Switch. Response: Comment noted. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/25/2018 10/25/2018: ADDRESSING/WAYFINDING >It is noted on GIS that this lot is actually addressed as 2145 Midpoint Drive but owned by the same entity as 2155 Midpoint Drive. It is suggested that 2155 be used until such time as the property is sold or developed further . >To assist with prompt emergency response, the address shall be clearly visible from the street on the existing building and proposed new building. Due to the setback of the existing building, the full address in 14" high letters and numerals should be attached to the north elevation of the existing building so it is clearly visible from Midpoint Drive. The proposed storage building should have the address in 8" numerals including unit identifier. Response: Comment noted. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018 10/24/2018: BY FINAL PLAN ROUND 1: Please change references from Non-irrigated Turf to Native Seed Mix. Response: All references to “non-irrigated turf” have been changed to “Native Seed Mix.” Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018 10/24/2018: BY FINAL PLAN ROUND 1: Please update Native Grass Seed Notes to the following. NATIVE SEED MIX NOTES 1. PREPARE SOIL AS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE FOR NATIVE SEED MIX SPECIES AND AS OUTLINED IN MUNICIPAL CODE 12-130 THROUGH 12-132. IN NATIVE AREAS THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE TYPICALLY SATISFIED THROUGH SOIL SAMPLES SHOWING QUALITY OF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF TOP SOIL IN CODE 12-131. THROUGH LOOSENING THE TOP 8 INCHES OF SOIL AND APPLYING 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL THEN SOIL AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS CAN BE FULFILLED. 2. AFTER SOIL HAS BEEN PROPERLY PREPARED THEN SEED EVENLY IN TWO DIRECTIONS TO DISTRIBUTE SEED OVER ENTIRE AREA. SEED ALL INDICATED AREAS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS. 3. IF CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE TO SEED MIX BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS THEN APPROVAL MUST BE PROVIDED BY CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER. 4. APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEEDING EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED (STANDARD TURF SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR AGRICULTURE EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE USED). 5. GENERALLY DRILL SEED APPLICATION RECOMMENDED PER SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE TO NO MORE THAN ½ INCH DEPTH (OR APPROPRIATE DEPTH FOR SELECTED SPECIES). WHEN USING BROADCAST SEEDING INSTEAD OF DRILL SEEDING METHOD DOUBLE SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE. REFER TO NATIVE SEED MIX TABLE FOR SPECIES, PERCENTAGES AND APPLICATION RATES. 6. PREPARE A WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ENSURE THAT WEEDS ARE PROPERLY MANAGED BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER SEEDING ACTIVITIES. 7. AFTER SEEDING THE AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH CRIMPED STRAW, JUTE MESH, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE METHODS. 8. WHERE NEEDED, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. IF IRRIGATION IS USED, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIONAL AT THE TIME OF SEEDING AND SHALL ENSURE 100% HEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE OVER ALL SEEDED AREAS. ALL METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS IN THE APPROVED IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BE FOLLOWED. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR SEEDED AREA FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, EROSION CONTROL, GERMINATION AND RESEEDING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH COVER. 10. THE APPROVED SEED MIX AREA IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A NATURAL LIKE LANDSCAPE AESTHETIC. IF AND WHEN MOWING OCCURS IN NATIVE GRASS SEED MIX AREAS, DO NOT MOW LOWER THAN 6 TO 8 INCHES IN HEIGHT TO AVOID INHIBITING NATIVE PLANT GROWTH. GENERALLY, MOW NO MORE THAN 3 TO 4 TIMES PER YEAR DURING ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD FOR WEED MANAGEMENT WHEN NECESSARY. 11. NATIVE SEED AREA WILL BE CONSIDERED ESTABLISHED WHEN SEVENTY PERCENT VEGETATIVE COVER IS REACHED WITH NO LARGER THAN ONE FOOT SQUARE BARE SPOTS AND/OR UNTIL DEEMED ESTABLISHED BY CITY PLANNING SERVICES AND EROSION CONTROL. 12. THE DEVELOPER AND/OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SEEDLING COVERAGE AND GROWTH AT THE TIME OF FINAL STABILIZATION, AS DEFINED BY STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES. IF FINAL STABILIZATION IS NOT ACHIEVED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE AGENCY, THE DEVELOPER AND/OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO SATISFY FINAL VEGETATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSEOUT. Response: Native Grass Seed Notes have been updated. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018 10/24/2018: INFORMATION ONLY: THANK YOU for selecting 3000K CCT for LED lights and supporting City Night Sky Objectives. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/24/2018 10/24/2018: Environmental Planning is READY FOR HEARING. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, 224-616-1992, mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: PRIOR TO NEXT SUBMITTAL (BEFORE FDP) The percentage of Catalpa trees proposed on the plans exceed the maximum percentage of any one species. There are 11 trees proposed on-site. Per the LUC requirements, if there are 10-19 proposed trees, the maximum percentage of any one species is 50%. Catalpa trees make up 55%. Please incorporate a third canopy shade tree to the plant list and adjust these numbers. Response: An additional species has been added to the list of deciduous trees. Now, no percentage of a single species exceeds 27%. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: PRIOR TO NEXT SUBMITTAL (BEFORE HEARING) Please incorporate a tree inventory and mitigation table, which can be provided by Molly Roche, Forestry Specialist. This should include mitigation values for every species. Please email me to receive the table. Response: Tree mitigation table is now included in the plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: PRIOR TO NEXT SUBMITTAL (BEFORE FDP) The number of Euonymus Green Boxleaf on the plans exceeds the quantity identified in the Plant List. Please update the plant list to reflect the correct number of Euonymus proposed. Response: Euonymus shrubs have been replaced with a taller screening evergreen shrub, a blue juniper. Numbers have been updated to match. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: PRIOR TO NEXT SUBMITTAL (BEFORE FDP) In the landscape plan legend, please identify turf as irrigated turf. Response: Landscape legend has been updated. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: COMPLETE DURING FDP Please include any existing or proposed street lights per Light and Power recommendations. Space street trees at the following distances from street lights: Canopy Shade tree: 40’ Ornamental tree: 15’ Response: Proposed canopy shade trees are at a distance of at least 40’ from proposed street lights, and we have no proposed ornamental trees. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: PRIOR TO NEXT SUBMITTAL (BEFORE HEARING) In addition to stating some of the trees as “to be removed”, please add a bolded X over the symbols for removed trees. Response: A bolded “X” has been added to all trees to be removed. Department: Light And Power Contact: Luke Unruh, 9704162724, lunruh@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/29/2018 10/29/2018: If a new electric service is anticipated for the new lean-to structure, Please call Luke Unruh to discuss power requirements and fees that will be associated. Response: Comment noted. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/26/2018 10/26/2018: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP. Response: Comment noted.