The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNEWTON SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED - BASIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - BDR180019 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview August 31, 2018 Nathan Fall 101 MEMORIAL PARKWAY #1185 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 RE: Newton Single-Family Detached, BDR180019, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Newton Single-Family Detached, BDR180019, Round Number 2. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Brandy Bethurem Harras, at (970) 416-2744 or bbethuremharras@fcgov.com. When you are ready to re-submit plans for the next round of review, please schedule a submittal appointment by emailing or calling your Development Review Coordinator. An appointment must be scheduled in advance. Your next submittal has been approved to be electronic only, so no hard copy plan sets will be required. Responses from the Developer follow each current comment in red text. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Kai Kleer, 970-416-4284, kkleer@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 08/28/2018: Please see site plan redlines. Redlines include minor text corrections, recalculation of net and gross lot size, text conflicts and correction of project title, and removal of the erosion control plan from the landscape plan and add to the utility plan set. Response: Agreed and have made these corrections except for gross lot size as it currently matches the recorded plat. Department: Engineering Development Review 2 Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 08/28/2018: The civil portion of the plan set still has general compliance aspects with our requirements. Please look to have City standard utility plan approval blocks on all sheets of the plan set. Please remove the Planning Certification and Ownership Certification on this civil set as well. An example of the City a Utility Plan Approval Block and cover sheet info on this set can be found here: http://citydocs.fcgov.com/?cmd=convert&vid=185&docid=3078976&dt=SUBMITTAL+DOCUMENTS+- +ROUND+2 Response: Agreed and have removed the certifications and added the proper utility plan approval block to each sheet on the civil plans. 07/17/2018: The plan set does not provide distinct separate civil and site plan documents and tends to mix components of each. A separate civil set requires items specified in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards noted in the Appendix E checklist along with a Utility Plan Approval Block on each page. Comment Number: 3 08/28/2018: Please add the following note to sheet 3. Street Cut Note: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Response: Agreed and have added the note. Comment Number: 4 08/28/2018: Either the water and sewer taps will need a utility easement dedicated to the City for the portion of utilities that are in Larimer County (off-site of the lot) and be shown on the plans, or the plans should perhaps be redesigned to bring the utilities off of the emergency driveway. More information on the dedication process can be found here under Easement and Right of Way Dedication: https://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php Response: The services have been redesigned so they are now located near the emergency access and inside the property boundary. Easements are no longer needed. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 08/28/2018: A utility easement is required for the water and sewer services that cross other properties before entering the proposed lot. This is required before signing of mylars. Another option is to relocate the services to enter the lot along the driveway entrance which would not require any easements. 3 Response: The services have been redesigned so they are now located near the emergency access and inside the property boundary. Easements are no longer needed. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 4 08/21/2018: The Erosion Control Materials will need to be submitted. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report as the recently received materials has comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as the recently received materials has comments and redlines, that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria and as a result may have changed the Escrow. If you need clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented above, please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015 jschlam@fcgov.com Response: The report, escrow and erosion control plan have been revised to address all the comments. 07/11/2018: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. The erosion control requirements can be located in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. a copy of the erosion control requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/eroison. The Erosion Control Materials will need to be submitted at time of the first round of FDP. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report as the recently received materials has comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as the recently received materials has comments and redlines, that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria and as a result have changed the Erosion Control Plans and would require a recalculation of the Escrow. If you need clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented above, please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015 jschlam@fcgov.com Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 8 08/28/2018: No additional comments. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 4 08/28/2018: Please include seed mix and scientific and common names, percentages and seeding rate needs to be included on landscape plan. Refer to seed mix examples emailed 8/1/2018. Response: The seed mix, application rate, and seeding notes have been included on the landscape plan. Department: Light and Power Contact: Austin Kreager, 970-224-6152, akreager@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 07/17/2018: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers. Comment Number: 5 08/22/2018: It does not appear at this time that Light and Power will be serving the new residence with electricity. I believe Xcel Energy will be your service provider at this time. At some point in the future Light and Power may take over this area, and we will work with you at that time to perform the work necessary. Response: Noted and will coordinate in the future if needed. Department: Street Oversizing Contact: Kyle Lambrecht, 970-221-6566, klambrecht@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 07/02/2018: Both Transportation Capital Expansion and Larimer County Regional Road fees will be collected for this development. Please contact Kyle Lambrecht for more information: klambrecht@fcgov.com or 970.221.6566. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 8 08/28/2018: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Response: Sheet titles and sheet index have been corrected. 07/17/2018: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. 5 Comment Number: 9 08/28/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Line over text issues have been corrected. 07/17/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 10 08/28/2018: The Benchmark Statement has an incorrect elevation. Response: The benchmark elevation has been corrected. 07/17/2018: There are some issues with the notes referencing elevations. Please make changes as marked. See redlines. Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 - X.XX¿. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 6 08/28/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Line over text issues have been corrected. 07/17/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 08/28/2018: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Response: Line over text issues have been corrected. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 4 08/27/2018: The Benchmark Statement has an incorrect elevation. Response: The benchmark elevation has been corrected. 07/16/2018: There are some issues with the notes referencing elevations. Please make changes as marked. See redlines. Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 6 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 - X.XX¿. Comment Number: 5 08/27/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Line over text issues have been corrected. 07/17/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines.