Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPIRIT AT THE RIVER (FORMERLY LINCOLN CORRIDOR HOTEL) - FDP - FDP180015 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview November 27, 2017 Studio PBA 1575 Gilpin St Denver, CO RE: Spirit at the River (formerly Lincoln Corridor Hotel), PDP170026, Round Number 3 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501, kandrews@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 11/20/2017: Thank you for addressing PDP level comments, Engineering is ready for the project to go to hearing. The comments below can be resolved with FDP. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 11/20/2017: Please list requested variances. Response: The First Modification of Standard (Section 3.2.1(E)(4), Parking Lot Perimeter Landscaping) meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H) of the Code The Second Modification of Standard (Section 4.20(D)(3)(a)(1), Height/Mass) meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H) of the Code Third Modification of Standard (Section 4.20(D)(3)(a)(2), Parking Lots) meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H) of the Code Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: LCUASS minimum driveway width is 24 feet; it appears that the eastern-most driveway to Lincoln is not being constructed to LCUASS standards. This driveway should be built in accordance with LCUASS Drawing 706.1 and should be labeled with a reference to the drawing. RMS Response: As discussed during staff review this is not a two-way driveway, it is a right only exit drive. The drive has been shown per PFA width requirements. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: Please label the western-most driveway to Lincoln with a reference to LCUASS Drawing 707.1. Response: Callout has been added to plans Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: On the utility plans legend, the proposed concrete pattern doesn’t appear to be what’s being shown on the plans to denote proposed concrete. Response: Plans have been revised per comment Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: I see that a temporary construction easement has been added to the plans for the removal of the existing trail – this can certainly be dedicated by separate document; however, it will be subject to easement dedication TDRF as well as separate recording fees. The City wouldn’t have any issue with this being dedicated on the plat. Response: The client prefers to dedicate by separate documents Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 11/16/2017 11/16/2017: Environmental Planning staff is ready for hearing. Thank you for addressing all PDP comments. Response: Acknowledged. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, , mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/03/2017 11/16/2017: Continued: Thank you for pointing out the labels on LP401. For additional clarity, please specify irrigated turf in the landscape legend. RMS Response: Per standard city landscape notes (refer to note #2) all turf shall be irrigated. 10/03/2017: Please show irrigated turf in the parkway along East Lincoln Ave. Response: Existing tree lawn turf is in place. A note has been added. New turf in tree lawn is shown where second driveway is removed with hatch and will meet and match existing turf, a note has been added. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/17/2017: For clarity, please explain why (6) Narrowleaf Cottonwood are shown at 1” caliper. It should be noted that Narrowleaf Cottonwood produces an abundance of sucker growth and can be difficult to maintain as well as become a nuisance. Please consider whether this species is appropriate where shown. Please also consider the use of Lanceleaf Cottonwood in the native areas. RMS Response: The 1” caliper trees were a request from Rebecca Everette to help establish a mid-story canopy within the buffer area. Because this area is intended to be a natural habitat area having the suckering trees will help to establish more a diverse canopy structure and less structured look to the landscape. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/17/2017: There appears to be one Bur Oak shown in the natural area. City Forestry would like to verify if this was intentional – it seems odd that only one Bur Oak is shown in this area. RMS response: There are 3 additional Bur Oak trees along the eastern boundary to the north. This is the 4th along the property line, and will continue that species distribution along the site. Department: Internal Services Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/11/2017 08/11/2017: Please schedule a pre-submittal meeting with Building Services for this project. Pre-Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new projects should email scarter@fcgov.com to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Response: Acknowledged Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/11/2017 08/11/2017: Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are: 2015 International Building Code (IBC) 2015 International Residential Code (IRC) 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2015 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2015 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2015 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com/building web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 129vult or 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use: 2015 IECC commercial chapter. Response: Acknowledged Department: Light And Power Contact: Austin Kreager, , akreager@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/21/2017 11/21/2017: Thank you for attempting to send in the C-1 form with this submittal. Unfortunately, that form did not make it to light and power. Please send the C-1 form and one-line diagram to me directly at akreager@fcgov.com Response: Acknowledged Contact: Coy Althoff, 970-224-6150, CAlthoff@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/09/2017 08/09/2017: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1Form.pdf Response: Acknowledged, one-line provided Department: Park Planning Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/04/2017 08/08/2017: Please contact Suzanne Bassinger at 970.416.4340 or sbassinger@fcgov.com with any questions about Park Planning comments. Response: Acknowledged. Contact: Suzanne Bassinger, 970-416-4340, sbassinger@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/21/2017 11/21/2017: Correction from 8/8/17 comments: Trail cross-section: 10' width, 5" Portland cement concrete as shown in the "Poudre Trail: Typical Detail" (Detail C, Sheet LS501, dated 10/27/17). Response: noted Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/21/2017 11/21/2017: Please label Regional Trail easement "Public Access and Trail Easement" Response: Label has been updated Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/21/2017 11/21/2017: Please place clarifying notes indicating the trail spur shall not be constructed of Yosemite Brown colored concrete, and will not be maintained by the COFC. Only the regional trail (parallel to the River) shall be Yosemite Brown colored concrete, and will be maintained by COFC. Response: Please refer to sheet LS401, a note is called out on the sheet that the spur will be standard grey. Please also refer to legend: hatches are also shown differently for both trails. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/21/2017 11/21/2017: Please indicate the location of temporary construction easement on the plans and provide a legal description for the easement - as requested in previous comments. Temporary construction easement would expire June 30, 2019. Response: A legal description will be provided in the next submittal due to late notice from client wanting to go with separate documents rather than in the Plat Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 11/17/2017 11/17/2017: FIRE LANE IDENTIFICATION The proposed plan indicates stripping of the fire lane. While stripping is an option allowed by code, maintenance of a stripped fire lane is often cumbersome and costly over time. PFA recommends permanent sign placement rather than stripping and I am happy to work with the applicant to create a successful signage plan if so desired. Response: Fire Lane signs have been added to the plans Department: Planning Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 11/10/2017 11/10/2017: Planning is ready for hearing. Response: Acknowledged. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017 11/20/2017: Repeat Comments from 9/27/2017, these can be addressed at FDP. 09/27/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq.ft., therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted at the latest by final material submittal. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. www.fcgov.com/erosion Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. The materials submitted at this point are sufficient for a PDP level submittal. At final please include in the Erosion Control Report references to the Phase 1 report that was done on this site dated 4/4/2017. The Erosion Control Plan included in the Stormwater Management Plan is hard to decipher due to its small size, but clearly mark the East entrance to the site as a closed access with a silt or construction fence to prevent any access by construction equipment or vehicles to Lincoln. Also please indicate on the plan where the concrete washout is slated to be located. 08/01/2017: (Repeat from PDR160010) The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq.ft., therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted at the latest by final material submittal. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. www.fcgov.com/erosion Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. Response: Erosion control plans and a SWMP are provide in this resubmittal. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: The impervious area used in the rain garden sizing calculations is not consistent with the hydrology table. Basin 1 has a 64 % impervious ratio and 55% was used. Response: The calculations in the report have been updated Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: A 20 to 1 side slope was used in the rain garden calculations when 4 to 1 is proposed on the grading plan. Response: The calculations in the report have been updated Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 11/17/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review. 10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review. 08/08/2017: Please remove addresses from all plan sets. With the project being replatted, the address could change. Response: Acknowledged Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 11/17/2017: All plan sets will be reviewed at the next round of review. 10/05/2017: All plan sets will be reviewed at the next round of review. 08/08/2017: All plan sets will be reviewed at the next round of review. Response: Acknowledged. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 11/17/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. 10/05/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. 08/08/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Response: Changes were made based on the 08/08/17 comments. Are there additional comments that need addressed that we are not aware of? Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/21/2017 11/21/2017: We'll have minor striping comments at final (i.e. the bike lane symbol and arrow in parking lot should be a "sharrow". ) RMS Response: Bike lanes have been shown with sharrow. 08/08/2017: Please include signing plans in the next submittal. This can be done in final. Response: Signage plans are included in this submittal Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/11/2017 08/11/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Response: Acknowledged. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/11/2017 10/04/2017: A Demolition Plan is required to document the existing services to be demolished. Also, the note says to be abandoned or used for irrigation. A determination for each existing water service needs to be made now in the design phase. Response: Demolition Plan has been added to the plan sets. 08/11/2017: Please clarify if any existing water or sewer services exist for this site. If any existing services are to be removed, they would need to be abandoned at the main. An existing water service can be retained as an irrigation service. Response: This will be coordinated with the Landscape Architect in the next submittal Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: A minimum of 5 feet is required between water taps. Please revise. Response: Plans have been revised accordingly. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/20/2017 11/20/2017: Please relocate the gate valves for the fire hydrant and fire service to be connected after the tee. Response: Comment is not applicable with new connections