Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMPASS COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE CHARTER SCHOOL - SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - SPA180001 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYTraffic Impact Study Compass Community Collaborative School Fort Collins, Colorado Prepared for: ML-3, LLC T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y Compass Community Collaborative School Fort Collins, Colorado Prepared for ML-3, LLC PO Box 270695 Fort Collins, 80527 Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4582 South Ulster Street Suite 1500 Denver, Colorado 80237 (303) 228-2300 March 2018 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 03/02/2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... i APPENDICES .................................................................................................................. i LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................ii 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS .................................................................. 5 3.1 Existing Roadway Network ................................................................................................5 3.2 Existing and Future Study Area .........................................................................................7 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................7 3.4 Unspecified Development Traffic Growth ...........................................................................7 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................. 11 4.1 Trip Generation................................................................................................................11 4.2 Trip Distribution ...............................................................................................................12 4.3 Traffic Assignment ...........................................................................................................13 4.4 Total (Background Plus Project) Traffic............................................................................14 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ...................................................................... 18 5.1 Analysis Methodology ......................................................................................................18 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis .............................................................................19 5.3 State Highway Turn Bay Length Analysis ........................................................................22 5.4 Queuing Analysis .............................................................................................................24 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... 27 APPENDICES Appendix A – TIS Base Assumptions Appendix B – Intersection Count Sheets Appendix C – Traffic Growth Information Appendix D – Trip Generation Worksheets Appendix E – Intersection Analysis Worksheets Appendix F– Queue Analysis Worksheets Appendix G – Conceptual Site Plan Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Compass Community Collaborative School Traffic Generation..................................12 Table 2 – Level of Service Definitions .......................................................................................18 Table 3 – Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue LOS Results ...................................................20 Table 4 – College Avenue Right-In/Right-Out Access LOS Results ..........................................21 Table 5 – Queuing Analysis Results ..........................................................................................24 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................4 Figure 2 – Existing Lanes and Control ........................................................................................6 Figure 3 – Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................8 Figure 4 – 2020 Background Traffic Volumes..............................................................................9 Figure 5 – 2040 Background Traffic Volumes............................................................................10 Figure 6 – Project Trip Distribution ............................................................................................13 Figure 7 – Project Traffic Assignment .......................................................................................15 Figure 8 – 2020 Total Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................16 Figure 9 – 2040 Total Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................17 Figure 10 – Recommended Lane Configurations and Control ...................................................26 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A new charter school, Compass Community Collaborative School, is proposed within the northwest quadrant of the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue (US-287) intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. The project is anticipated to occupy an existing building with 15,025 square feet of building area. The school proposes to have a capacity of 400 students on site. It is expected that the project will be completed by 2020; therefore, analysis was completed for the 2020 short term horizon as well as the 2040 long term horizon per City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) requirements. Of note, Compass Community Collaborative School is not anticipated to meet student compacity by 2020, but full capacity was assumed in 2020 to provide a conservative and full buildout scenario. The purpose of this study is to identify project traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential project traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. The intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue was incorporated into this traffic study in accordance with City of Fort Collins and CDOT standards and requirements. In addition, the existing right-in/right-out access along College Avenue to be shared with the proposed development was evaluated. Primary access to the site will be provided by Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue. Direct access to the project is proposed from the existing signalized intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue, and an existing right-in/right-out driveway along College Avenue. The existing right-in/right-out access along College Avenue is located approximately 300 feet (measured center to center) north of the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue intersection. The Compass Community Collaborative School project is expected to generate approximately 992 daily weekday trips with 130 of these trips occurring during the morning peak hour of the generator and 139 trips during the afternoon peak hour of the generator based on the staggered start times. Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns, anticipated surrounding development areas, and the Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 2 proposed access system for the project. Assignment of project traffic was based upon the trip generation described previously and the distributions developed. Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Compass Community Collaborative School will be successfully incorporated into the existing roadway network. The west leg of the College Avenue (US-287) right-in/right-out access intersection is anticipated to have traffic volumes increase by more than 20 percent, and therefore it is believed that CDOT will require an access permit for this access intersection. All off-site and on- site improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to standards of the City of Fort Collins, CDOT, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and the Manual on Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – 2009 Edition. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) has prepared this report to document the results of a Traffic Impact Study of future traffic conditions associated with the proposed Compass Community Collaborative School to be located near the northwest of the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue (US-287) intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. A vicinity map illustrating the project site location is shown in Figure 1. The project is anticipated to occupy an existing building with 15,025 square feet of building space. The charter school proposes to include a capacity of 400 students on site. It is expected that the project will be completed by 2020. Analysis was therefore conducted for the 2020 short term horizon, as well as the 2040 long-term horizon per City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) requirements. A conceptual site and circulation plan illustrating the development and access locations is shown in Appendix G. The purpose of this study is to identify project traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential project traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. The intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue was incorporated into this traffic study in accordance with City of Fort Collins and CDOT standards and requirements. In addition, the existing right-in/right-out access along College Avenue to be shared with the proposed development was evaluated. The City of Fort Collins Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form is shown in Appendix A. Primary access to the site will be provided by Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue. Direct access to the project is proposed from the existing signalized intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue, and an existing right-in/right-out driveway along College Avenue. The existing right-in/right-out access along College Avenue is located approximately 300 feet (measured center to center) north of the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue intersection. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 5 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Existing Roadway Network Rutgers Avenue provides one lane of travel each direction, eastbound and westbound, and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour east of College Avenue. West of College Avenue, the Rutgers Avenue alignment provides access to an existing commercial center. This access provides two through lanes in each direction west of College Avenue to the existing Whole Foods grocery store. College Avenue (US-287) is owned and maintained by CDOT. The State Highway Access Category Schedule categorizes the segment of College Avenue (US-287) through the study area as NR-B: Non Rural Arterial. College Avenue provides three lanes of travel each direction, northbound and southbound, and has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour. College Avenue has a raised median through the project study area. The existing intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue operates with a traffic signal and permissive only left turn phasing on all approaches except for the northbound left turn movement which operates with protected-permissive phasing. The eastbound approach consists of a left turn lane and shared through/right turn lane. The westbound approach to the frontage road providing residential access includes a single lane approach. Beyond this point at the intersection with College Avenue there is adequate width for separate left turn and through/right turn lanes. The northbound approach consists of a left turn lane and three through lanes with the outermost being a shared through/right turn lane. The southbound approach consists of a left turn lane, three through lanes, and a right turn lane. An existing right-in/right-out access is located approximately 300 feet north of the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue intersection, measured center to center. This existing access is anticipated to remain and provide shared access with the proposed development. This existing College Avenue driveway is an unsignalized “T”-intersection with stop control on the eastbound approach. The eastbound approach consists of a single right turn lane, with controlled right turn movements only due to a raised median island within College Avenue. The intersection lane configuration and control for these study area key intersections are shown in Figure 2. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 7 3.2 Existing and Future Study Area The existing site is comprised of two existing multi-tenant specialty retail buildings. The surrounding area contains a mix of uses. Directly to the north of the site is A’s Storage. Directly to the west of the site is the MAX BRT line. Directly to the east of the site (between the site and College Avenue) are retail uses. Directly to the south of the site are commercial uses (Whole Foods Shopping Center). Outside of these uses, residential areas exist to the east, while Colorado State University exists to the west and northwest. 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the key intersections on Wednesday, February 14, 2018. The counts were conducted in 15-minute intervals during the morning and afternoon peak hours of adjacent street traffic from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM, respectively, on this count date. Existing turning movement counts are shown in Figure 3 with count sheets provided in Appendix B. 3.4 Unspecified Development Traffic Growth According to information provided on the website for the Colorado Department of Transportation, the 20-year growth factor along College Avenue (US-287) within the study area is 1.02. This value equates to an annual growth rate of approximately 0.10 percent. Upon discussions with the City of Fort Collins, it was determined that an annual traffic volume growth rate of one percent was more appropriate to represent anticipated future traffic volumes along College Avenue and Rutgers Avenue. Therefore, an annual traffic volume growth rate of one (1) percent was used in this traffic analysis for all movements not being generated by the retail along the west side of College Avenue as this traffic is anticipated to remain constant in the future. Traffic information from the CDOT Online Transportation Information System (OTIS) website is included in Appendix C for information purposes only. The City recommended annual growth rate of one percent per year was used to calculate future traffic volumes for the near term 2020 and long term 2040 traffic volume projections at the key intersections, as shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. 62(110) 1561(1597) 11(11) 85(252) 1142(2208) 4(22) 96(224) 4(18) 44(146) 3(11) 3(13) 6(10) 1687(1839) 11(24) 1232(2464) 2(14) 62(110) 1592(1629) 11(11) 85(252) 1165(2252) 4(22) 96(224) 4(18) 44(146) 3(11) 3(13) 6(10) 1721(1876) 11(24) 1257(2514) 2(14) 62(110) 1943(1988) 14(14) 85(252) 1421(2748) 5(27) 96(224) 4(18) 44(146) 4(14) 3(13) 7(12) 2100(2289) 11(24) 1533(3067) 2(14) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 11 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 Trip Generation Site-generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate traffic generated by the development during a specific time interval. Using the ITE Trip Generation Manual Trip Generation Report1 published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is the industry standard for determining site-generated traffic estimates. ITE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. Compass Community Collaborative School is a proposed charter school expected to have an enrollment capacity of 400 students. Based on this, Kimley-Horn used the ITE Trip Generation Report average rate equations that apply to Private School (536) for traffic associated with the proposed development. The school will have staggered start and release times. The first start (which is anticipated to occupy 40 percent of the school population) will begin at 7:55 AM and be released at 3:10 PM. The second start (which is anticipated to occupy 30 percent of the school) will begin at 8:40 AM and be released at 4:00 PM, while The third start (which is anticipated to also occupy 30 percent of the school population) is scheduled to begin at 9:25 AM with a release time of 4:45 PM. Trip generation reduction factors were utilized due to the staggered start and release times for the school. It was determined through evaluation of the existing traffic counts that the morning peak hour of traffic occurred from 8:15 AM to 9:15 AM while the afternoon peak hour of traffic occurred from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM, as it relates to the peak hour of the school generator. The morning peak hour coincides with the second start which is anticipated to occupy 30 percent of the school; however, 40 percent of the anticipated trips generated by the school in the morning were used in the analysis to be conservative. The afternoon peak hour coincides with the release of both the second and third waves which are anticipated to combine to occupy 60 percent of the school population. Therefore, 60 percent of the anticipated trips generated by the school in the afternoon peak were used in the analysis. The trip generation worksheet is 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation: An Information Report, Tenth Edition, Washington DC, 2017. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 12 included in Appendix C. These calculations illustrate the equations used and directional distribution of trips based on ITE studies. The proposed school is a redevelopment of previous uses; however, the existing retail shops are primarily vacant and a reduction of trips already being generated by the retail uses was not utilized to provide a conservative analysis. Taking into account the staggered bell schedule reduction factors, Compass Community Collaborative School is expected to generate approximately 992 daily weekday trips with 130 of these trips occurring during the morning peak hour of the generator and 139 trips during the afternoon peak hour of the generator. Calculations were based on the procedure and information provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition – Volume 1: User’s Guide and Handbook, 2017. Table 1 summarizes the estimated trip generation for the proposed development. Table 1 – Compass Community Collaborative School Traffic Generation Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Private School (K-12) – 400 Students (ITE 536) 992 198 126 324 97 135 232 Staggered Bell Schedule Factors (40% AM – 60% PM) 992 79 51 130 58 81 139 Site Trip Generation 992 79 51 130 58 81 139 4.2 Trip Distribution Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns, anticipated surrounding development areas, expected roadway improvements, and the proposed access system for the project. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site-generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direction and departs the site back to the original source. Figure 6 illustrates the expected trip distribution for the site. [50%] 5% 45% [20%] [10%] 10% 40% 5% [50%] [20%] [70%] 55% [20%] Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 14 4.3 Traffic Assignment Traffic assignment was obtained by applying the project trip distributions to the estimated traffic generation of the school shown in Table 1. Traffic assignment for the project is shown in Figure 7. 4.4 Total (Background Plus Project) Traffic Site traffic volumes were added to the background volumes to represent estimated traffic conditions for the short term 2020 and long term 2040 horizons. These total traffic volumes for the site redevelopment with the project are illustrated for the 2020 and 2040 horizon years in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. 32(23) 4(3) 10(16) 26(41) 5(8) 10(16) 8(6) 26(41) 36(26) 4(3) 10(16) 94(133) 1592(1629) 11(11) 89(255) 1175(2268) 4(22) 122(265) 9(26) 54(162) 3(11) 11(19) 6(10) 1747(1917) 47(50) 1261(2517) 12(30) 94(133) 1943(1988) 14(14) 89(255) 1431(2764) 5(27) 122(265) 9(26) 54(162) 4(14) 11(19) 7(12) 2126(2330) 47(50) 1537(3070) 12(30) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 18 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Kimley-Horn’s analysis of traffic operations in the site vicinity was conducted to determine potential capacity deficiencies in the 2020 and 2040 development horizons at the identified key intersection and access driveway. The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)2. 5.1 Analysis Methodology Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway during a specific time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). For intersections and roadways in this study area, typical standard traffic engineering practice recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations for overall intersections and LOS E for movements and approaches of unsignalized intersections. Table 2 shows the definition of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 2 – Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Signalized Intersection Average Total Delay (sec/veh) Unsignalized Intersection Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 and ≤ 20 > 10 and ≤ 15 C > 20 and ≤ 35 > 15 and ≤ 25 D > 35 and ≤ 55 > 25 and ≤ 35 E > 55 and ≤ 80 > 35 and ≤ 50 F > 80 > 50 _______________ Definitions provided from the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010. Study area intersections were analyzed based on average total delay analysis for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Under the unsignalized analysis, the level of service (LOS) for a two-way stop controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled 2 Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Washington DC, 2010. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 19 intersection is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Level of service for a signalized and all-way stop controlled intersection is defined for each approach and for the overall intersection. 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the level of service at the key intersection and project access driveway for the study area are provided in Appendix E. The signalized intersection analysis utilizes the observed cycle lengths of 110 seconds for the morning peak hour and 120 seconds for the afternoon peak hour with existing phasing and timing splits of the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue intersection. The existing year analysis is based on the lane geometry and intersection control shown in Figure 2. LOS for the intersections was calculated using Synchro software presenting the HCM results. Existing peak hour factors were utilized at the study area intersections with exception of the movements to and from the school from the right-in/right-out access. Movements to and from a school typically have lower peak hour factors due to students arriving and departing in a timeframe spanning less than a full hour. For these movements, a peak hour factor of 0.50 and 0.70 was used during the morning and afternoon peak hours. The afternoon peak hour factor is higher due to coinciding with two release times whereas the morning peak hour only coincides with one start time. The peak hour factors should be conservative due to staggered school start times and the right-in-right-out access being a shared access. Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue The existing intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue operates with a traffic signal and permissive left turn phasing on all approaches except for the northbound left turn movement which operated with protected-permissive phasing. With the existing configuration, the intersection currently operates at LOS A during the morning peak hour and LOS B during the afternoon peak hour. With or without the addition of school traffic, this intersection is expected to continue operating acceptably with LOS C or better during the peak hours throughout the 2040 horizon. Therefore, no modifications are anticipated to be needed at this intersection due to construction of the project. Table 3 provides the results of the level of service at this intersection. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 20 Table 3 – Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2018 Existing – Overall Eastbound Left Eastbound Through/Right Westbound Left Westbound Through/Right Northbound Left Northbound Through Southbound Left Southbound Through Southbound Right 8.0 49.3 43.5 44.7 41.7 4.6 4.3 6.2 6.8 5.3 A D D D D A A A A A 19.3 54.1 43.2 48.6 36.9 46.3 8.9 14.7 19.4 11.9 B D D D D D A B B Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 21 College Avenue Right-In/Right-Out Access The existing College Avenue access is an unsignalized “T”-intersection with stop control on the eastbound approach. This existing right-in/right-out access is located approximately 300 feet (measured center to center) north of the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue signalized intersection. The southbound right turn lane at the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue intersection is constructed back to this right-in/right-out access, which can serve as an acceleration lane for right turn exiting movements out of the driveway. For purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that all right turn exiting traffic operates with stop control and not the use of this southbound right turn lane. With the existing configuration, the eastbound right turn currently operates acceptably at LOS C during the morning peak hour and LOS E during the afternoon peak hour. With the addition of project traffic in 2020 and 2040, the eastbound right turn movement may operate at LOS F during the afternoon peak hour. As noted, the operational analysis was performed with all eastbound right turn traffic coming to a stop on the eastbound approach and waiting for a gap in southbound College Avenue traffic. Delays are anticipated to be less than predicted due to the existing southbound right turn deceleration lane constructed from the Rutgers Avenue signalized intersection to this access. This right turn deceleration lane will allow right turning traffic to use this lane for acceleration to facilitate improved right turn movements. If high delays and poor level of service are realized in the future on this exiting right turn movement, traffic is anticipated to reroute on the street network and use the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue signalization intersection to exit the site. Therefore, no modifications are anticipated to be needed at this intersection with development of the project. Table 4 provides the results of the level of service. Table 4 – College Avenue Right-In/Right-Out Access LOS Results Scenario AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS 2018 Existing Eastbound Right 16.5 C 39.2 E 2020 Background Traffic Eastbound Right 16.8 C 41.3 E 2020 Total Traffic Eastbound Right 18.5 C 53.2 F 2040 Background Traffic Eastbound Right 20.1 C 69.6 F 2040 Total Traffic Eastbound Right 22.7 C 106.1 F Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 22 5.3 State Highway Turn Bay Length Analysis Since the College Avenue (US-287) is a state highway and maintained facility, it is recommended that auxiliary turn lanes along US 287 be constructed in accordance with the current CDOT State Highway Access Code (SHAC). The following discusses requirements for turn lanes along College Avenue (US-287) with the roadway posted speed limit being 40 miles per hour through the project study area. The State Highway Access Category Schedule categorizes the segment of College Avenue (US-287) through the study area as NR-B: Non-Rural Arterial. According to the State Highway Access Code for category NR-B roadways with a speed limit of less than or equal to 40 miles per hour, the following thresholds apply: • A left turn deceleration lane with storage length plus taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour left ingress turning volume greater than 25 (vph). • A right turn deceleration lane with storage length plus taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour right ingress turning volume greater than 50 (vph). • Right turn acceleration lanes are generally not required. Based on existing and future traffic projections, the auxiliary turn lane requirements were calculated per the SHAC for the intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue as well as the project access along College Avenue (US-287). The west leg of the US-287 right-in/right-out access intersection is anticipated to have traffic volumes increase by more than 20 percent with the Compass Community Collaborative School redevelopment project; therefore, it is believed that CDOT will require an access permit for this intersection. The Rutgers Avenue signalized intersection along College Avenue (US-287) is not anticipated to have traffic volumes increase by more than 20 percent with the project, and therefore an access permit is not believed to be needed at this intersection. Through the existing access intersections, the State Highway provides three lanes of travel in each direction (northbound and southbound) with a 40 mile per hour posted speed limit. As such, right turn acceleration and deceleration lanes aren’t generally needed, but were identified herein to determine if they could provide a benefit. Turn lane requirements at the College Avenue signalized intersection with Rutgers Avenue and the right- in/right-out access are as follows: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 23 Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue (US-287) Signalized Intersection • A northbound left turn lane is currently warranted at the existing Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue (US-287) intersection with existing traffic being 110 vehicles per hour (vph) and the threshold for requiring a left turn deceleration lane being 25 vph. The projected northbound left turn volume with the project is anticipated to be 133 vph. The northbound left turn deceleration length requirement is 150 feet of storage plus a 144- foot taper. This lane exists today and provides a length of 225 feet with a taper of approximately 100 feet. It isn’t believed that it would be beneficial to shorten the length of the turn lane to increase the taper length (especially since it is a reverse curve taper instead of a straight taper). Therefore, it is believed that this existing northbound left turn deceleration lane is in compliance with the SHAC and no modifications are needed. • A southbound right turn deceleration lane is warranted at the existing Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue (US-287) intersection with the existing right turn volume being 252 vph with the threshold for requiring a right turn deceleration lane being 50 vph. The southbound right turn volume with the project is anticipated to increase to 255 vph. The SHAC southbound right turn deceleration length requirement is 250 feet storage plus a 144-foot taper. This lane currently exists with a length of 225 feet that extends to the project right-in/right-out access. The calculated extension per SHAC is due to the existing traffic volumes (252 right turns), but this storage lane is constructed to the maximum length available due to the location of the driveway to the north; therefore, no mitigation is recommended at this location. Providing a continuous lane through the existing driveway location is not feasible due to the sloped wall located along the west side of College Avenue north of the right-in/right-out access location. Therefore, it is believed that this existing southbound right turn will not require any modifications. College Avenue (US-287) right-in/right-out access intersection • A southbound right turn deceleration lane is not warranted at the existing College Avenue (US-287) right-in/right-out access intersection with the projected right turn volume being 50 vph and the threshold for requiring a right turn deceleration lane being greater than 50 vph. As mentioned previously, a right turn lane is not feasible due to the grade separated sloped wall located north of the project access driveway. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 24 5.4 Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis was conducted for the signalized study area intersection of Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue (US-287) and the existing College Avenue right-in/right-out access intersection. The queuing analysis was performed using the Synchro analysis software presenting the results of the 95th percentile queue lengths. Results are shown in the following Table 5 with calculations provided within the level of service operational sheets of Appendix E for the unsignalized intersection and Appendix F for signalized intersection. Table 5 – Queuing Analysis Results Intersection Turn Lane Existing Turn Lane Length (feet) 2020 Calculated Queue (feet) 2020 Recommended Turn Lane Length (feet) 2040 Calculated Queue (feet) 2040 Recommended Turn Lane Length (feet) Rutgers Avenue & College Avenue Eastbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Left Southbound Left Southbound Right 250’ C 225’ 225’ 225’ 345’ 25’ 116’ 33’ 93’ 250’ C 225’ 225’ 225’ 391’ 21’ 124’ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 25 existing onsite configuration and layout will successfully accommodate this queue length with a throat of 75 feet provided. Based on the results of the level of service operational analysis and turn lane analysis, the recommended lane configurations and control of the study area intersections are shown in Figure 10 for both the 2020 and 2040 horizons. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School Page 27 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Compass Community Collaborative School project will be successfully incorporated into the existing roadway network. The west leg of the College Avenue (US-287) right-in/right-out access intersection is anticipated to have traffic volumes increase by more than 20 percent, and therefore it is believed that CDOT will require an access permit for this access intersection. All off-site and on-site improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to standards of the City of Fort Collins, CDOT, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and the Manual on Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – 2009 Edition. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDICES Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDIX A TIS Base Assumptions North: South of Arthur Dr South: Rutgers Avenue East: West: S. College Avenue Short Range: 2020 Long Range: 2040 Sat NA Passby: Overall Trip Distribution Mode Split Assumptions Date: Local Entity Engineering: Attachement A Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions S. College Avenue Compass Community Collaborative School Near NWC South College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue Project Information Type of Study Intermediate: Study Area Bounderies Areas Requiring Special Study 2. S College Ave/Rutgers Ave 3. S. College RIRO 4 5 6 7 8 NA AM: 7:30 - 9:30 PM: 3:00-5:00 Study Years 3/1/2018 Traffic Engineering: Curtis Rowe Project Name Project Location Full: X Committed Roadway Improvements Other Traffic Studies Captive Market: NA See Attached Figure 1.0 Percent per year TIS Assumptions NA Trip Adjustment Factors Future Traffic Growth Rate Study Intersections 1. All access drives Time Period for Study Trip Generation Rates See attached ITE Calc Sheet / Staggered Bell Schedule Factors Project Compass Collaborative Community School Subject Trip Generation for Private School (K-12) Designed by Jeff Planck Date February 28, 2018 Job No. 096707000 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - Private School (K-12) (ITE Land Use Code 536) Independant Variable - Students (X) Students = 400 X = 400.0 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Weekday (Series 500 Page 81) Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting (T) = 2.48 (X) T = 992 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T) = 2.48 * (400.0) 496 entering 496 exiting 496 + 496 = 992 AM Peak Hour of Generator (500 Series Page 84) Directional Distribution: 61% ent. 39% exit. T = 0.81 (X) T = 324 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 0.81 * 400 198 entering 126 exiting 198 + 126 = 324 PM Peak Hour of Generator (500 Series Page 85) Directional Distribution: 42% ent. 58% exit. T = 0.58 (X) T = 232 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 0.58 * 400 97 entering 135 exiting 97 + 135 = 232 Compass Community Collaborative School Trip Generation In Out Total In Out Total Private School (K-12) 400 Students 992 198 126 324 97 135 232 Staggered Bell Schedule Factors (40% AM - 60% PM) - - 992 79 51 130 58 81 139 992 79 51 130 58 81 139 PM Site Trip Generation Land Use Quantity Daily AM Units [50%] 5% 45% [20%] [10%] 10% 40% 5% [50%] [20%] [70%] 55% [20%] Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDIX B Intersection Count Sheets File Name : College Ave and Rutgers Ave AM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 1 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School AM Peak College Ave (US-287) and Rutgers Ave Groups Printed- Automobiles Rutgers Ave Eastbound Rutgers Ave Westbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 15 1 8 0 24 3 0 2 0 5 7 399 2 0 408 3 266 25 0 294 731 07:45 AM 20 1 9 0 30 1 1 1 0 3 14 426 1 0 441 1 285 17 0 303 777 Total 35 2 17 0 54 4 1 3 0 8 21 825 3 0 849 4 551 42 0 597 1508 08:00 AM 17 2 10 0 29 0 0 2 0 2 10 350 2 0 362 4 220 21 0 245 638 08:15 AM 21 1 12 0 34 1 1 1 0 3 18 383 4 0 405 1 244 12 0 257 699 08:30 AM 36 1 12 0 49 2 1 0 0 3 15 398 3 0 416 0 252 26 0 278 746 08:45 AM 19 1 8 0 28 2 1 0 0 3 11 443 3 0 457 1 339 24 0 364 852 Total 93 5 42 0 140 5 3 3 0 11 54 1574 12 0 1640 6 1055 83 0 1144 2935 09:00 AM 20 1 12 0 33 1 0 2 0 3 18 337 1 0 356 2 307 23 0 332 724 09:15 AM 20 0 17 0 37 0 0 1 0 1 10 298 2 1 311 3 257 34 0 294 643 Grand Total 168 8 88 0 264 10 4 9 0 23 103 3034 18 1 3156 15 2170 182 0 2367 5810 Apprch % 63.6 3 33.3 0 43.5 17.4 39.1 0 3.3 96.1 0.6 0 0.6 91.7 7.7 0 Total % 2.9 0.1 1.5 0 4.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 0.4 1.8 52.2 0.3 0 54.3 0.3 37.3 3.1 0 40.7 Morrison, CO 80465 File Name : College Ave and Rutgers Ave AM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 2 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School AM Peak College Ave (US-287) and Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) Rutgers Ave Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) Right 182 Thru 2170 Left 15 U Turns 0 Out In Total 3211 2367 5578 Right 9 Thru 4 Left 10 U Turns 0 Out In Total 41 23 64 Left 103 Thru 3034 Right 18 U Turns 1 Out In Total 2268 3156 5424 Left 168 Thru 8 Right 88 U Turns 0 Out In Total 289 264 553 2/14/2018 07:30 AM 2/14/2018 09:15 AM Automobiles North File Name : College Ave and Rutgers Ave AM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 3 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School AM Peak College Ave (US-287) and Rutgers Ave Rutgers Ave Eastbound Rutgers Ave Westbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 09:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM 08:15 AM 21 1 12 0 34 1 1 1 0 3 18 383 4 0 405 1 244 12 0 257 699 08:30 AM 36 1 12 0 49 2 1 0 0 3 15 398 3 0 416 0 252 26 0 278 746 08:45 AM 19 1 8 0 28 2 1 0 0 3 11 443 3 0 457 1 339 24 0 364 852 09:00 AM 20 1 12 0 33 1 0 2 0 3 18 337 1 0 356 2 307 23 0 332 724 Total Volume 96 4 44 0 144 6 3 3 0 12 62 1561 11 0 1634 4 1142 85 0 1231 3021 % App. Total 66.7 2.8 30.6 0 50 25 25 0 3.8 95.5 0.7 0 0.3 92.8 6.9 0 PHF .667 1.00 .917 .000 .735 .750 .750 .375 .000 1.00 .861 .881 .688 .000 .894 .500 .842 .817 .000 .845 .886 College Ave (US-287) Rutgers Ave Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) Right 85 Thru 1142 Left 4 U Turns 0 Out In Total 1660 1231 2891 Right 3 Thru 3 Left 6 U Turns File Name : College Ave and Rutgers Ave PM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 1 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School PM Peak College Ave (US-287) and Rutgers Ave Groups Printed- Automobiles Rutgers Ave Eastbound Rutgers Ave Westbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total 03:00 PM 44 1 25 0 70 3 1 1 0 5 25 391 2 0 418 6 511 47 0 564 1057 03:15 PM 39 4 32 0 75 3 2 3 0 8 33 409 3 0 445 3 490 55 0 548 1076 03:30 PM 57 3 37 0 97 0 2 5 0 7 21 412 4 0 437 5 505 41 1 552 1093 03:45 PM 46 0 29 0 75 6 2 4 0 12 25 403 0 0 428 3 518 48 0 569 1084 Total 186 8 123 0 317 12 7 13 0 32 104 1615 9 0 1728 17 2024 191 1 2233 4310 04:00 PM 50 8 36 0 94 1 3 1 0 5 23 360 4 0 387 5 550 64 1 620 1106 04:15 PM 48 3 27 0 78 3 1 2 0 6 40 397 0 0 437 5 566 62 0 633 1154 04:30 PM 67 3 44 0 114 1 6 4 0 11 26 405 2 0 433 6 498 62 0 566 1124 04:45 PM 59 4 39 0 102 5 3 4 0 12 21 435 5 0 461 6 594 64 0 664 1239 Total 224 18 146 0 388 10 13 11 0 34 110 1597 11 0 1718 22 2208 252 1 2483 4623 Grand Total 410 26 269 0 705 22 20 24 0 66 214 3212 20 0 3446 39 4232 443 2 4716 8933 Apprch % 58.2 3.7 38.2 0 33.3 30.3 36.4 0 6.2 93.2 0.6 0 0.8 89.7 9.4 0 Total % 4.6 0.3 3 0 7.9 0.2 0.2 0.3 0 0.7 2.4 36 0.2 0 38.6 0.4 47.4 5 0 52.8 Morrison, CO 80465 File Name : College Ave and Rutgers Ave PM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 2 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School PM Peak College Ave (US-287) and Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) Rutgers Ave Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) Right 443 Thru 4232 Left 39 U Turns 2 Out In Total 3646 4716 8362 Right 24 Thru 20 Left 22 U Turns 0 Out In Total 85 66 151 Left 214 Thru 3212 Right 20 U Turns 0 Out In Total 4523 3446 7969 Left 410 Thru 26 Right 269 U Turns 0 Out In Total 677 705 1382 2/14/2018 03:00 PM 2/14/2018 04:45 PM Automobiles North File Name : College Ave and Rutgers Ave PM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 3 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School PM Peak College Ave (US-287) and Rutgers Ave Rutgers Ave Eastbound Rutgers Ave Westbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 50 8 36 0 94 1 3 1 0 5 23 360 4 0 387 5 550 64 1 620 1106 04:15 PM 48 3 27 0 78 3 1 2 0 6 40 397 0 0 437 5 566 62 0 633 1154 04:30 PM 67 3 44 0 114 1 6 4 0 11 26 405 2 0 433 6 498 62 0 566 1124 04:45 PM 59 4 39 0 102 5 3 4 0 12 21 435 5 0 461 6 594 64 0 664 1239 Total Volume 224 18 146 0 388 10 13 11 0 34 110 1597 11 0 1718 22 2208 252 1 2483 4623 % App. Total 57.7 4.6 37.6 0 29.4 38.2 32.4 0 6.4 93 0.6 0 0.9 88.9 10.1 0 PHF .836 .563 .830 .000 .851 .500 .542 .688 .000 .708 .688 .918 .550 .000 .932 .917 .929 .984 .250 .935 .933 College Ave (US-287) Rutgers Ave Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) Right 252 Thru 2208 Left 22 U Turns 1 Out In Total 1832 2483 4315 Right 11 Thru 13 Left 10 U Turns 0 File Name : College & RIRO North of Rutgers Ave AM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 1 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School AM Peak College Ave RIRO North of Rutgers Ave Groups Printed- Automobiles RIRO Eastbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru U Turns App. Total Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 457 0 457 287 1 0 288 745 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 441 0 441 308 7 0 315 756 Total 0 0 0 0 0 898 0 898 595 8 0 603 1501 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 341 0 341 240 1 0 241 582 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 410 0 410 251 3 0 254 664 08:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 464 0 464 320 2 0 322 787 08:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 449 0 449 358 4 0 362 812 Total 0 2 0 2 0 1664 0 1664 1169 10 0 1179 2845 09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 364 0 364 303 2 0 305 669 09:15 AM 0 2 0 2 0 325 0 325 305 4 0 309 636 Grand Total 0 4 0 4 0 3251 0 3251 2372 24 0 2396 5651 Apprch % 0 100 0 0 100 0 99 1 0 Total % 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 57.5 0 57.5 42 0.4 0 42.4 Morrison, CO 80465 File Name : College & RIRO North of Rutgers Ave AM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 2 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School AM Peak College Ave RIRO North of Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) RIRO College Ave (US-287) Right 24 Thru 2372 U Turns 0 Out In Total 3251 2396 5647 Left 0 Thru 3251 U Turns 0 Out In Total 2376 3251 5627 Left 0 Right 4 U Turns 0 Out In Total 24 4 28 2/14/2018 07:30 AM 2/14/2018 09:15 AM Automobiles North Morrison, CO 80465 File Name : College & RIRO North of Rutgers Ave AM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 3 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School AM Peak College Ave RIRO North of Rutgers Ave RIRO Eastbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru U Turns App. Total Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 09:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:15 AM 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 410 0 410 251 3 0 254 664 08:30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 464 0 464 320 2 0 322 787 08:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 449 0 449 358 4 0 362 812 09:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 364 0 364 303 2 0 305 669 Total Volume 0 2 0 2 0 1687 0 1687 1232 11 0 1243 2932 % App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 99.1 0.9 0 PHF .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .909 .000 .909 .860 .688 .000 .858 .903 College Ave (US-287) RIRO College Ave (US-287) Right 11 Thru 1232 U Turns 0 Out In Total 1687 1243 2930 Left 0 Thru 1687 U Turns 0 Out In Total 1234 1687 2921 Left 0 Right 2 U Turns 0 Out In Total 11 2 13 Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM Automobiles Peak Hour Data File Name : College & RIRO North of Rutgers Ave PM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 1 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School PM Peak College Ave RIRO North of Rutgers Ave Groups Printed- Automobiles RIRO Eastbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru U Turns App. Total Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total 03:00 PM 0 2 0 2 0 436 0 436 570 4 0 574 1012 03:15 PM 0 1 0 1 0 452 0 452 536 4 0 540 993 03:30 PM 0 2 0 2 0 464 0 464 575 5 0 580 1046 03:45 PM 0 1 0 1 0 430 0 430 550 9 0 559 990 Total 0 6 0 6 0 1782 0 1782 2231 22 0 2253 4041 04:00 PM 0 2 0 2 0 425 0 425 629 3 0 632 1059 04:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 433 0 433 628 5 0 633 1068 04:30 PM 0 5 0 5 0 499 0 499 559 10 0 569 1073 04:45 PM 0 5 0 5 0 482 0 482 648 6 0 654 1141 Total 0 14 0 14 0 1839 0 1839 2464 24 0 2488 4341 Grand Total 0 20 0 20 0 3621 0 3621 4695 46 0 4741 8382 Apprch % 0 100 0 0 100 0 99 1 0 Total % 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 43.2 0 43.2 56 0.5 0 56.6 Morrison, CO 80465 File Name : College & RIRO North of Rutgers Ave PM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 2 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School PM Peak College Ave RIRO North of Rutgers Ave College Ave (US-287) RIRO College Ave (US-287) Right 46 Thru 4695 U Turns 0 Out In Total 3621 4741 8362 Left 0 Thru 3621 U Turns 0 Out In Total 4715 3621 8336 Left 0 Right 20 U Turns 0 Out In Total 46 20 66 2/14/2018 03:00 PM 2/14/2018 04:45 PM Automobiles North Morrison, CO 80465 File Name : College & RIRO North of Rutgers Ave PM Site Code : IPO 309 Start Date : 2/14/2018 Page No : 3 Fort Collins, CO Compass Community Collaborative School PM Peak College Ave RIRO North of Rutgers Ave RIRO Eastbound College Ave (US-287) Northbound College Ave (US-287) Southbound Start Time Left Right U Turns App. Total Left Thru U Turns App. Total Thru Right U Turns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 2 0 2 0 425 0 425 629 3 0 632 1059 04:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 433 0 433 628 5 0 633 1068 04:30 PM 0 5 0 5 0 499 0 499 559 10 0 569 1073 04:45 PM 0 5 0 5 0 482 0 482 648 6 0 654 1141 Total Volume 0 14 0 14 0 1839 0 1839 2464 24 0 2488 4341 % App. Total 0 100 0 0 100 0 99 1 0 PHF .000 .700 .000 .700 .000 .921 .000 .921 .951 .600 .000 .951 .951 College Ave (US-287) RIRO College Ave (US-287) Right 24 Thru 2464 U Turns 0 Out In Total 1839 2488 4327 Left 0 Thru 1839 U Turns 0 Out In Total 2478 1839 4317 Left 0 Right 14 U Turns 0 Out In Total 24 14 38 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Automobiles Peak Hour Data Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDIX C Traffic Growth Information Compass Collaborative Community School Traffic Projections ROUTE REFPT ENDREFPT LENGTH UPDATEYR AADT YR20FACTOR DHV LOCATION 287C 343.187 344.194 0.997 2015 39000 1.02 9 ON SH 287 COLLEGE AVE N/O HORSETOOTH RD FT COLLINS 287C 344.194 345.212 1.002 2015 37000 1.02 9.5 ON SH 287 COLLEGE AVE N/O DRAKE RD FT COLLINS Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDIX D Trip Generation Worksheets Project Compass Collaborative Community School Subject Trip Generation for Private School (K-12) Designed by Jeff Planck Date February 28, 2018 Job No. 096707000 Checked by Date Sheet No. 1 of 1 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - Private School (K-12) (ITE Land Use Code 536) Independant Variable - Students (X) Students = 400 X = 400.0 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Weekday (Series 500 Page 81) Average Weekday Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting (T) = 2.48 (X) T = 992 Average Vehicle Trip Ends (T) = 2.48 * (400.0) 496 entering 496 exiting 496 + 496 = 992 AM Peak Hour of Generator (500 Series Page 84) Directional Distribution: 61% ent. 39% exit. T = 0.81 (X) T = 324 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 0.81 * 400 198 entering 126 exiting 198 + 126 = 324 PM Peak Hour of Generator (500 Series Page 85) Directional Distribution: 42% ent. 58% exit. T = 0.58 (X) T = 232 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 0.58 * 400 97 entering 135 exiting 97 + 135 = 232 Compass Community Collaborative School Trip Generation In Out Total In Out Total Private School (K-12) 400 Students 992 198 126 324 97 135 232 Staggered Bell Schedule Factors (40% AM - 60% PM) - - 992 79 51 130 58 81 139 992 79 51 130 58 81 139 PM Site Trip Generation Land Use Quantity Daily AM Units Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDIX E Intersection Analysis Worksheets HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2018 Existing AM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 4 44 6 3 3 62 1561 11 4 1142 85 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 4 44 6 3 3 62 1561 11 4 1142 85 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 143 4 48 8 4 8 72 1774 16 8 1360 104 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.38 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.50 0.84 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 240 16 194 203 72 144 353 4089 37 243 3587 1116 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.79 0.79 0.71 0.71 0.71 Sat Flow, veh/h 1393 123 1475 1344 549 1099 1774 5198 47 263 5085 1582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 143 0 52 8 0 12 72 1157 633 8 1360 104 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1393 0 1598 1344 0 1648 1774 1695 1854 263 1695 1582 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 3.2 0.6 0.0 0.7 1.1 12.2 12.2 1.1 11.8 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.7 0.0 3.2 3.8 0.0 0.7 1.1 12.2 12.2 4.3 11.8 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 240 0 210 203 0 217 353 2667 1459 243 3587 1116 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.00 0.25 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.20 0.43 0.43 0.03 0.38 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 430 0 429 387 0 442 450 2667 1459 243 3587 1116 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 0.0 42.9 44.6 0.0 41.8 4.3 3.8 3.8 5.9 6.5 5.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.5 5.8 6.5 0.1 5.5 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.3 0.0 43.5 44.7 0.0 41.9 4.6 4.3 4.7 6.2 6.8 5.3 LnGrp LOS D D D D A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 195 20 1862 1472 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.7 43.0 4.5 6.7 Approach LOS D D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 91.0 19.0 8.9 82.1 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 71.5 29.5 10.5 56.5 29.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.2 13.7 3.1 13.8 5.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 46.6 0.7 0.1 36.4 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 8.0 HCM 2010 LOS A HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2018 Existing PM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 224 18 146 10 13 11 110 1597 11 22 2208 252 Future Volume (veh/h) 224 18 146 10 13 11 110 1597 11 22 2208 252 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 255 32 176 20 24 16 159 1736 20 24 2374 257 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.56 0.83 0.50 0.54 0.69 0.69 0.92 0.55 0.92 0.93 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 340 55 304 188 234 156 188 3619 42 209 3080 950 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.70 0.70 0.61 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 1346 244 1339 1166 1032 688 1774 5182 60 272 5085 1569 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 255 0 208 20 0 40 159 1136 620 24 2374 257 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1346 0 1583 1166 0 1720 1774 1695 1852 272 1695 1569 Q Serve(g_s), s 22.2 0.0 14.0 1.9 0.0 2.2 4.5 18.2 18.2 5.3 41.4 9.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 24.4 0.0 14.0 15.9 0.0 2.2 4.5 18.2 18.2 12.4 41.4 9.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 340 0 359 188 0 390 188 2368 1293 209 3080 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.58 0.11 0.00 0.10 0.85 0.48 0.48 0.12 0.77 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 366 0 389 210 0 423 260 2368 1293 209 3080 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.4 0.0 41.3 48.4 0.0 36.7 29.6 8.2 8.2 13.5 17.5 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.7 0.0 1.9 0.2 0.0 0.1 16.7 0.7 1.3 1.1 1.9 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.0 0.0 6.3 0.6 0.0 1.1 6.0 8.6 9.6 0.5 19.9 4.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.1 0.0 43.2 48.6 0.0 36.9 46.3 8.9 9.5 14.7 19.4 11.9 LnGrp LOS D D D D D A A B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 463 60 1915 2655 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.2 40.8 12.2 18.7 Approach LOS D D B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 88.3 31.7 11.1 77.2 31.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 81.5 29.5 11.5 65.5 29.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.2 26.4 6.5 43.4 17.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 58.7 0.8 0.2 21.7 1.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.3 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background AM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 4 44 6 3 3 62 1592 11 4 1165 85 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 4 44 6 3 3 62 1592 11 4 1165 85 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 143 4 48 8 4 8 72 1809 16 8 1387 104 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.38 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.50 0.84 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 240 16 194 203 72 144 346 4091 36 237 3588 1116 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.79 0.79 0.71 0.71 0.71 Sat Flow, veh/h 1393 123 1475 1344 549 1099 1774 5199 46 254 5085 1582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 143 0 52 8 0 12 72 1180 645 8 1387 104 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1393 0 1598 1344 0 1648 1774 1695 1855 254 1695 1582 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 3.2 0.6 0.0 0.7 1.1 12.5 12.5 1.2 12.1 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.7 0.0 3.2 3.8 0.0 0.7 1.1 12.5 12.5 4.7 12.1 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 240 0 210 203 0 216 346 2668 1459 237 3588 1116 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.00 0.25 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.21 0.44 0.44 0.03 0.39 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 418 0 414 375 0 427 444 2668 1459 237 3588 1116 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 0.0 42.9 44.6 0.0 41.8 4.3 3.8 3.8 6.1 6.6 5.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.5 5.9 6.7 0.1 5.8 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.3 0.0 43.5 44.7 0.0 41.9 4.6 4.4 4.8 6.3 6.9 5.3 LnGrp LOS D D D D A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 195 20 1897 1499 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.8 43.0 4.5 6.8 Approach LOS D D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 91.1 18.9 8.9 82.1 18.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 72.5 28.5 10.5 57.5 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.5 13.7 3.1 14.1 5.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 47.8 0.6 0.1 37.4 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 8.0 HCM 2010 LOS A HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Background PM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 224 18 146 10 13 11 110 1629 11 22 2252 252 Future Volume (veh/h) 224 18 146 10 13 11 110 1629 11 22 2252 252 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 267 32 176 20 24 16 159 1771 20 24 2422 257 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.56 0.83 0.50 0.54 0.69 0.69 0.92 0.55 0.92 0.93 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 350 57 313 198 241 161 188 3582 40 200 3029 935 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.69 0.69 0.60 0.60 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 1347 244 1340 1166 1032 688 1774 5184 59 263 5085 1570 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 267 0 208 20 0 40 159 1158 633 24 2422 257 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1347 0 1584 1166 0 1720 1774 1695 1852 263 1695 1570 Q Serve(g_s), s 23.3 0.0 13.9 1.8 0.0 2.2 4.8 19.2 19.2 5.7 44.1 9.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 25.5 0.0 13.9 15.7 0.0 2.2 4.8 19.2 19.2 13.5 44.1 9.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 350 0 370 198 0 402 188 2343 1280 200 3029 935 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.00 0.56 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.85 0.49 0.49 0.12 0.80 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 369 0 392 214 0 426 255 2343 1280 200 3029 935 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.0 0.0 40.5 47.5 0.0 36.1 31.0 8.7 8.7 14.5 18.7 11.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.6 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 17.4 0.7 1.4 1.2 2.3 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.5 0.0 6.2 0.6 0.0 1.1 6.1 9.1 10.2 0.5 21.1 4.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.7 0.0 42.2 47.7 0.0 36.2 48.4 9.4 10.1 15.8 21.0 12.5 LnGrp LOS D D D D D A B B C B Approach Vol, veh/h 475 60 1950 2703 Approach Delay, s/veh 49.2 40.0 12.8 20.2 Approach LOS D D B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.4 32.6 11.4 76.0 32.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 81.3 29.7 11.5 65.3 29.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 21.2 27.5 6.8 46.1 17.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 57.9 0.6 0.2 18.9 2.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.3 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Total AM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 122 9 54 6 11 3 94 1592 11 4 1175 89 Future Volume (veh/h) 122 9 54 6 11 3 94 1592 11 4 1175 89 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 182 10 59 8 15 8 109 1809 16 8 1399 109 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.38 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.50 0.84 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 279 39 229 236 189 101 330 3911 35 223 3395 1056 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.75 0.75 0.67 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 1380 234 1382 1324 1138 607 1774 5199 46 254 5085 1582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 182 0 69 8 0 23 109 1180 645 8 1399 109 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1380 0 1616 1324 0 1745 1774 1695 1855 254 1695 1582 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.1 0.0 4.1 0.6 0.0 1.2 1.9 14.5 14.5 1.4 13.9 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.3 0.0 4.1 4.7 0.0 1.2 1.9 14.5 14.5 6.6 13.9 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 279 0 268 236 0 289 330 2551 1395 223 3395 1056 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.26 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.33 0.46 0.46 0.04 0.41 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 445 0 463 395 0 500 470 2551 1395 223 3395 1056 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.3 0.0 40.0 42.0 0.0 38.8 6.0 5.2 5.2 8.2 8.4 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.6 0.0 1.9 0.2 0.0 0.6 1.0 6.9 7.8 0.1 6.6 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.8 0.0 40.5 42.1 0.0 38.9 6.5 5.8 6.3 8.5 8.8 6.7 LnGrp LOS D D D D A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 251 31 1934 1516 Approach Delay, s/veh 45.8 39.7 6.0 8.6 Approach LOS D D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.3 22.7 9.3 77.9 22.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 69.5 31.5 13.5 51.5 31.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.5 17.3 3.9 15.9 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 44.5 0.9 0.2 31.6 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 10.0 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2020 Total PM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 265 26 162 10 19 11 133 1629 11 22 2268 255 Future Volume (veh/h) 265 26 162 10 19 11 133 1629 11 22 2268 255 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 315 46 195 20 35 16 193 1771 20 24 2439 260 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.56 0.83 0.50 0.54 0.69 0.69 0.92 0.55 0.92 0.93 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 395 83 353 223 328 150 222 3380 38 184 2690 829 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.65 0.65 0.53 0.53 0.53 Sat Flow, veh/h 1336 305 1292 1133 1201 549 1774 5184 59 263 5085 1567 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 315 0 241 20 0 51 193 1158 633 24 2439 260 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1336 0 1597 1133 0 1750 1774 1695 1852 263 1695 1567 Q Serve(g_s), s 27.7 0.0 15.5 1.8 0.0 2.6 8.1 21.7 21.7 6.4 52.1 11.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 30.3 0.0 15.5 17.4 0.0 2.6 8.1 21.7 21.7 13.2 52.1 11.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 395 0 436 223 0 478 222 2211 1208 184 2690 829 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.00 0.55 0.09 0.00 0.11 0.87 0.52 0.52 0.13 0.91 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 404 0 446 230 0 489 299 2211 1208 184 2690 829 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.0 0.0 37.4 44.8 0.0 32.7 36.0 11.0 11.0 18.4 25.6 16.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.5 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 18.1 0.9 1.6 1.5 5.7 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 11.4 0.0 7.0 0.6 0.0 1.3 7.4 10.2 11.4 0.5 25.6 5.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.5 0.0 38.8 45.0 0.0 32.8 54.1 11.9 12.7 19.9 31.3 17.0 LnGrp LOS D D D C D B B B C B Approach Vol, veh/h 556 71 1984 2723 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.7 36.2 16.3 29.9 Approach LOS D D B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 82.8 37.2 14.8 68.0 37.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 77.5 33.5 15.5 57.5 33.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 23.7 32.3 10.1 54.1 19.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 52.2 0.4 0.2 3.4 2.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 26.7 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2040 Background AM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 96 4 44 7 3 4 62 1943 14 5 1421 85 Future Volume (veh/h) 96 4 44 7 3 4 62 1943 14 5 1421 85 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 143 4 48 9 4 11 72 2208 20 10 1692 104 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.38 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.50 0.84 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 239 16 196 205 58 159 283 4082 37 173 3580 1114 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.79 0.79 0.70 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 1390 123 1475 1344 434 1195 1774 5198 47 171 5085 1582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 143 0 52 9 0 15 72 1440 788 10 1692 104 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1390 0 1598 1344 0 1629 1774 1695 1854 171 1695 1582 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 3.2 0.7 0.0 0.9 1.1 17.4 17.5 2.5 16.2 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.9 0.0 3.2 3.9 0.0 0.9 1.1 17.4 17.5 11.1 16.2 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 239 0 212 205 0 216 283 2663 1456 173 3580 1114 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.00 0.24 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.25 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.47 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 376 0 371 338 0 378 364 2663 1456 173 3580 1114 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.0 0.0 42.8 44.5 0.0 41.7 5.3 4.4 4.4 8.1 7.2 5.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.4 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.6 8.3 9.3 0.2 7.7 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.4 0.0 43.3 44.6 0.0 41.9 5.8 5.2 5.9 8.8 7.7 5.3 LnGrp LOS D D D D A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 195 24 2300 1806 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.8 42.9 5.4 7.5 Approach LOS D D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 90.9 19.1 8.9 81.9 19.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 75.5 25.5 9.5 61.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.5 13.9 3.1 18.2 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 52.5 0.6 0.1 41.1 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 8.4 HCM 2010 LOS A HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2040 Background PM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 224 18 146 12 13 14 110 1988 14 27 2748 252 Future Volume (veh/h) 224 18 146 12 13 14 110 1988 14 27 2748 252 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 267 32 176 24 24 20 159 2161 25 29 2955 257 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.56 0.83 0.50 0.54 0.69 0.69 0.92 0.55 0.92 0.93 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 317 52 284 169 197 164 181 3692 43 150 3098 956 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.07 0.71 0.71 0.61 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 1341 243 1338 1166 928 773 1774 5182 60 179 5085 1569 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 267 0 208 24 0 44 159 1413 773 29 2955 257 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1341 0 1581 1166 0 1701 1774 1695 1852 179 1695 1569 Q Serve(g_s), s 23.0 0.0 14.3 2.3 0.0 2.5 6.3 24.7 24.7 11.5 65.1 9.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 25.5 0.0 14.3 16.6 0.0 2.5 6.3 24.7 24.7 23.8 65.1 9.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 317 0 336 169 0 362 181 2416 1319 150 3098 956 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.00 0.62 0.14 0.00 0.12 0.88 0.58 0.59 0.19 0.95 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 317 0 336 169 0 362 181 2416 1319 150 3098 956 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.9 0.0 42.8 50.4 0.0 38.2 39.0 8.5 8.5 17.4 21.9 11.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.2 0.0 3.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 35.3 1.0 1.9 2.8 8.5 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.4 0.0 6.6 0.8 0.0 1.2 7.0 11.7 13.2 0.7 32.5 4.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 67.2 0.0 46.3 50.8 0.0 38.3 74.2 9.5 10.4 20.3 30.4 11.7 LnGrp LOS E D D D E A B C C B Approach Vol, veh/h 475 68 2345 3241 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.0 42.7 14.2 28.8 Approach LOS E D B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 90.0 30.0 12.4 77.6 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 85.5 25.5 7.9 73.1 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 26.7 27.5 8.3 67.1 18.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 58.4 0.0 0.0 6.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 25.7 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2040 Total AM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 122 9 54 7 11 4 94 1943 14 5 1431 89 Future Volume (veh/h) 122 9 54 7 11 4 94 1943 14 5 1431 89 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 182 10 59 9 15 11 109 2208 20 10 1704 109 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.38 0.86 0.88 0.69 0.50 0.84 0.82 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 278 39 231 238 166 122 271 3904 35 163 3388 1054 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.75 0.75 0.67 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 1377 234 1382 1324 993 728 1774 5198 47 171 5085 1582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 182 0 69 9 0 26 109 1440 788 10 1704 109 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1377 0 1616 1324 0 1721 1774 1695 1854 171 1695 1582 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 0.0 4.1 0.7 0.0 1.4 2.0 20.2 20.3 3.0 18.5 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.6 0.0 4.1 4.7 0.0 1.4 2.0 20.2 20.3 13.9 18.5 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 278 0 270 238 0 288 271 2546 1393 163 3388 1054 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.26 0.04 0.00 0.09 0.40 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.50 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 405 0 419 359 0 446 379 2546 1393 163 3388 1054 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.3 0.0 39.9 41.9 0.0 38.7 7.6 5.9 5.9 11.0 9.2 6.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.9 1.7 0.7 0.5 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.6 0.0 1.9 0.2 0.0 0.7 1.1 9.5 10.7 0.2 8.7 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.9 0.0 40.3 42.0 0.0 38.9 8.6 6.8 7.6 11.7 9.7 6.8 LnGrp LOS D D D D A A A B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 251 35 2337 1823 Approach Delay, s/veh 45.8 39.7 7.2 9.6 Approach LOS D D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.1 22.9 9.3 77.8 22.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 72.5 28.5 11.5 56.5 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 22.3 17.6 4.0 20.5 6.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 47.4 0.8 0.1 34.5 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 10.6 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2040 Total PM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/02/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 265 26 162 12 19 14 133 1988 14 27 2764 255 Future Volume (veh/h) 265 26 162 12 19 14 133 1988 14 27 2764 255 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 315 46 195 24 35 20 193 2161 25 29 2972 260 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.56 0.83 0.50 0.54 0.69 0.69 0.92 0.55 0.92 0.93 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 343 72 306 175 262 150 215 3563 41 143 2860 882 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.69 0.69 0.56 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 1330 304 1290 1133 1102 630 1774 5182 60 179 5085 1568 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 315 0 241 24 0 55 193 1413 773 29 2972 260 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1330 0 1594 1133 0 1732 1774 1695 1852 179 1695 1568 Q Serve(g_s), s 25.5 0.0 16.3 2.3 0.0 3.0 8.8 26.8 26.9 12.5 67.5 10.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.5 0.0 16.3 18.6 0.0 3.0 8.8 26.8 26.9 24.4 67.5 10.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 343 0 379 175 0 411 215 2331 1273 143 2860 882 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.64 0.14 0.00 0.13 0.90 0.61 0.61 0.20 1.04 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 343 0 379 175 0 411 215 2331 1273 143 2860 882 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.6 0.0 41.1 49.5 0.0 36.0 40.2 10.0 10.1 20.6 26.2 13.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 29.1 0.0 3.5 0.4 0.0 0.1 34.8 1.2 2.2 3.2 28.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 13.2 0.0 7.5 0.8 0.0 1.5 8.4 12.7 14.3 0.7 38.7 4.7 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 77.6 0.0 44.6 49.8 0.0 36.2 75.0 11.2 12.2 23.8 54.3 14.6 LnGrp LOS E D D D E B B C F B Approach Vol, veh/h 556 79 2379 3261 Approach Delay, s/veh 63.3 40.3 16.7 50.9 Approach LOS E D B D Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.0 33.0 15.0 72.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 82.5 28.5 10.5 67.5 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.9 30.5 10.8 69.5 20.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 53.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 38.9 HCM 2010 LOS D HCM 2010 TWSC 2018 Existing AM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 0 1687 1232 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 0 1687 1232 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 50 92 91 86 69 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 1854 1433 16 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 724 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 316 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 316 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.5 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 316 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.013 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 16.5 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2018 Existing PM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 14 0 1839 2464 24 Future Vol, veh/h 0 14 0 1839 2464 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 7 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 70 92 92 95 60 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 20 0 1999 2594 40 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 1324 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 126 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 125 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 39.2 0 0 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 125 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.16 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 39.2 - - HCM Lane LOS - E - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.5 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background AM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 0 1721 1257 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 0 1721 1257 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 50 92 91 86 69 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 1891 1462 16 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 739 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 309 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 309 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.8 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 309 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.013 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 16.8 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Background PM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 14 0 1876 2514 24 Future Vol, veh/h 0 14 0 1876 2514 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 7 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 70 92 92 95 60 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 20 0 2039 2646 40 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 1350 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 120 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 119 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 41.3 0 0 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 119 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.168 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 41.3 - - HCM Lane LOS - E - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.6 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Total AM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 12 0 1747 1261 47 Future Vol, veh/h 0 12 0 1747 1261 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 50 92 91 86 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 24 0 1920 1466 94 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 780 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 290 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 290 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.5 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 290 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.083 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 18.5 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2020 Total PM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 30 0 1917 2517 50 Future Vol, veh/h 0 30 0 1917 2517 50 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 7 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 70 92 92 95 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 43 0 2084 2649 71 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 1367 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 117 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 116 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 53.2 0 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 116 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.369 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 53.2 - - HCM Lane LOS - F - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1.5 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 Background AM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 0 2100 1533 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 0 2100 1533 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 50 92 91 86 69 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 4 0 2308 1783 16 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 899 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 242 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 242 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 242 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.017 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 20.1 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 Background PM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 14 0 2289 3067 24 Future Vol, veh/h 0 14 0 2289 3067 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 7 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 70 92 92 95 60 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 20 0 2488 3228 40 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 1641 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 76 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 75 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 69.6 0 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 75 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.267 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 69.6 - - HCM Lane LOS - F - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 1 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 Total AM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 12 0 2126 1537 47 Future Vol, veh/h 0 12 0 2126 1537 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 50 92 91 86 50 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 24 0 2336 1787 94 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 941 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 227 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 227 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.7 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 227 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.106 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 22.7 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - - HCM 2010 TWSC 2040 Total PM.syn 2: S. College Avenue & Access 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 30 0 2330 3070 50 Future Vol, veh/h 0 30 0 2330 3070 50 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 7 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 70 92 92 95 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 43 0 2533 3232 71 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 1659 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 74 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 74 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 106.1 0 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) - 74 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.579 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 106.1 - - HCM Lane LOS - F - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 2.5 - - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDIX F Queue Analysis Worksheets Queues 2020 Total AM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 182 69 8 23 109 1825 8 1399 109 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.20 0.03 0.07 0.37 0.49 0.06 0.44 0.11 Control Delay 59.1 12.7 33.7 25.6 8.4 7.0 12.5 11.9 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.1 12.7 33.7 25.6 8.4 7.0 12.5 11.9 2.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 123 6 5 9 18 165 2 169 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 130 41 14 23 42 247 6 235 20 Internal Link Dist (ft) 264 327 344 212 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 225 225 Base Capacity (vph) 395 507 379 508 379 3749 133 3198 1013 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.46 0.14 0.02 0.05 0.29 0.49 0.06 0.44 0.11 Intersection Summary Queues 2020 Total PM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 315 241 20 51 193 1791 24 2439 260 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.44 0.10 0.11 0.78 0.53 0.21 0.92 0.30 Control Delay 74.6 13.1 33.8 24.6 48.5 11.4 24.2 34.1 7.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 74.6 13.1 33.8 24.6 48.5 11.4 24.2 34.1 7.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 231 38 11 20 95 256 10 652 37 Queue Length 95th (ft) #345 21 17 26 116 295 33 #813 93 Internal Link Dist (ft) 264 327 344 212 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 225 225 Base Capacity (vph) 369 575 221 502 288 3373 112 2657 861 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.85 0.42 0.09 0.10 0.67 0.53 0.21 0.92 0.30 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Queues 2040 Total AM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/01/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 182 69 9 26 109 2228 10 1704 109 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.20 0.04 0.08 0.45 0.59 0.13 0.54 0.11 Control Delay 59.5 12.7 33.9 23.7 12.1 8.2 17.2 13.6 2.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.5 12.7 33.9 23.7 12.1 8.2 17.2 13.6 2.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 123 6 5 9 18 230 3 225 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 130 41 15 25 46 338 8 320 21 Internal Link Dist (ft) 264 327 344 212 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 225 225 Base Capacity (vph) 356 464 343 457 294 3751 77 3175 1006 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.15 0.03 0.06 0.37 0.59 0.13 0.54 0.11 Intersection Summary Queues 2040 Total PM.syn 1: S. College Avenue & Rutgers Avenue 03/02/2018 Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 315 241 24 55 193 2186 29 2972 260 v/c Ratio 1.01 0.49 0.14 0.13 0.90 0.63 0.43 1.04 0.28 Control Delay 98.6 19.1 38.6 28.6 70.4 11.3 38.7 54.0 5.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 98.6 19.1 38.6 28.6 70.4 11.3 38.7 54.0 5.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~248 59 15 24 99 307 12 ~910 33 Queue Length 95th (ft) #391 41 21 31 #124 349 #58 #995 77 Internal Link Dist (ft) 264 327 344 212 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 225 225 Base Capacity (vph) 313 493 177 424 216 3488 68 2865 913 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.01 0.49 0.14 0.13 0.89 0.63 0.43 1.04 0.28 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096707000 – Compass Community Collaborative School APPENDIX G Conceptual Site Plan C.O. MASON CORRIDOR TRANSITWAY A BIG A SELF STORAGE (N.A.P.) VACANT LAND (N.A.P.) SPRING CREEK MAX STATION MATTRESS FIRM (N.A.P.) PELETON CYCLES (N.A.P.) WHOLE FOODS (N.A.P.) DROP-OFF ZONE MAIN ENTRANCE NORTH COMPASS COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE SCHOOL PARKING AND CIRCULATION EXHIBIT MARCH 5, 2018 LEGEND North Morrison, CO 80465 North Morrison, CO 80465 Out In Total 51 34 85 Left 110 Thru 1597 Right 11 U Turns 0 Out In Total 2364 1718 4082 Left 224 Thru 18 Right 146 U Turns 0 Out In Total 375 388 763 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Automobiles Peak Hour Data North Morrison, CO 80465 Morrison, CO 80465 0 Out In Total 19 12 31 Left 62 Thru 1561 Right 11 U Turns 0 Out In Total 1192 1634 2826 Left 96 Thru 4 Right 44 U Turns 0 Out In Total 150 144 294 Peak Hour Begins at 08:15 AM Automobiles Peak Hour Data North Morrison, CO 80465 Morrison, CO 80465 58’ 77’ 250’ C 225’ 225’ 225’ College Avenue RIRO Access Eastbound Right C (175’) 38’ C 63’ C C = Continuous Lane As shown in the table representing the queuing results, all anticipated queues are accommodated or managed within existing turn bay lengths with exception of the eastbound left turn queue at the Rutgers Avenue and College Avenue intersection. This storage lane is built to maximum length as it backs to an internal drive aisle that fronts the existing building. This intersection is expected to operate at LOS D with 38.9 seconds of delay during the future peak hour; therefore, additional green time could be provided to the minor approaches while maintaining acceptable operations (delay threshold from D to E is 55 seconds). This additional green time could alleviate queues if they begin to back up to the nearest on-site drive aisle. The eastbound exiting queue length for the existing shared right-in/right-out access along College Avenue was also evaluated. The eastbound right turn queue was calculated to need 63 feet of storage which amounts to approximately three vehicles of storage (75 feet) in 2040. The B 2020 Background Traffic – Overall Eastbound Left Eastbound Through/Right Westbound Left Westbound Through/Right Northbound Left Northbound Through Southbound Left Southbound Through Southbound Right 8.0 49.3 43.5 44.7 41.9 4.6 4.4 6.3 6.9 5.3 A D D D D A A A A A 20.3 54.7 42.2 47.7 36.2 48.4 9.4 15.8 21.0 12.5 C D D D D D A B C B 2020 Total Traffic – Overall Eastbound Left Eastbound Through/Right Westbound Left Westbound Through/Right Northbound Left Northbound Through Southbound Left Southbound Through Southbound Right 10.0 47.8 40.5 42.1 38.9 6.5 5.8 8.5 8.8 6.7 B D D D D A A A A A 26.7 54.5 38.8 45.0 32.8 54.1 11.9 19.9 31.3 17.0 C D D D C D B B C B 2040 Background Traffic – Overall Eastbound Left Eastbound Through/Right Westbound Left Westbound Through/Right Northbound Left Northbound Through Southbound Left Southbound Through Southbound Right 8.4 49.4 43.3 44.6 41.9 5.8 5.2 8.8 7.7 5.3 A D D D D A A A A A 25.7 67.2 46.3 50.8 38.3 74.2 9.5 20.3 30.4 11.7 C E D D D E A C C B 2040 Total Traffic – Overall Eastbound Left Eastbound Through/Right Westbound Left Westbound Through/Right Northbound Left Northbound Through Southbound Left Southbound Through Southbound Right 10.6 47.9 40.3 42.0 38.9 8.6 6.8 11.7 9.7 6.8 B D D D D A A B A A 38.9 77.6 44.6 49.8 36.2 75.0 11.2 23.8 54.3 14.6 D E D D D E B C D* B * LOS grade corrected from Synchro report based on delay level.