Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY COMMONS LOT 5, CHILD CARE - MAJOR AMENDMENT & FDP - FDP170036 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORTFINAL DRAINAGE REPORT
Harmony Commons Subdivision
Lot 5
Prepared for:
Capital Real Estate, Inc.
50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1480
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 313-0126
Prepared by:
Interwest Consulting Group
1218 West Ash, Suite A
Windsor, Colorado 80550
(970) 674-3300
December 19, 2017
Job Number 1339-178-00
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ iii
1. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................ 1
1.1 Location ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Description of Property ................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Floodplain Submittal Requirements ............................................................................. 1
2. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS .......................................................................... 2
2.1 Major Basin Description ................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Sub-basin Description .................................................................................................... 2
3. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA ...................................................................................... 2
3.1 Regulations ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA) Discussion .......................................... 2
3.3 Development Criteria Reference and Constraints ...................................................... 4
3.4 Hydrological Criteria ..................................................................................................... 4
3.5 Hydraulic Criteria .......................................................................................................... 5
3.6 Floodplain Regulations Compliance ............................................................................. 5
3.7 Modifications of Criteria ............................................................................................... 5
4. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN ....................................................................................... 5
4.1 General Concept ............................................................................................................. 5
4.2 Specific Details ................................................................................................................ 5
5. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................... 7
5.1 Compliance with Standards .......................................................................................... 7
5.2 Drainage Concept ........................................................................................................... 7
6. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 7
APPENDIX
VICINITY MAP AND DRAINAGE PLAN .............................................................................. A
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS .......................................................................................... B
HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS .............................................................................................. C
WATER QUALITY AND LID INFORMATION .................................................................... D
EXCERPTS FROM REFERENCE REPORTS......................................................................... E
1
1. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
1.1 Location
The Harmony Commons Subdivision – Lot 5 is located in the Northwest Quarter of
Section 4, Township 6 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, in the City
of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado. Please refer to the vicinity map in Appendix
A.
The project site is located at the northwest corner of Timberwood Drive and Lady Moon
Drive. Lady Moon Drive bounds the property on the east, Lot 6 of Harmony Commons
on the west and Lot 4 of Harmony Commons on the north and Timberwood Drive on the
south.
1.2 Description of Property
The property consists of about 1.85 acres of land and will consist of a new building, new
parking and drive aisles.
The site generally slopes in a westerly direction at approximately 0.5% to 1.0%. It was
overlot graded with the development of Lots 3 and 4. The land is currently being used as
overflow parking with a recycled asphalt surface.
According to FEMA Panel 08069C0994F there are no mapped FEMA Floodways on this
property.
1.3 Floodplain Submittal Requirements
Because the project is not within any FEMA or City of Fort Collins mapped floodway, a
Floodplain Submittal is not required and a “City of Fort Collins Floodplain Review
Checklist for 100% Submittals” has not been included with this report.
2
2. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS
2.1 Major Basin Description
The proposed development lies within the McClellands Basin and McClellands Creek
Master Drainage Plan. The overall development has been designed with a master plan by
Stantec Consulting, Inc. and titled “Final Drainage and Erosion Control Study Harmony
Technology Park Site Master Plan”, dated May 19, 2008. The area was also designed
with a drainage report by Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. and titled “Final Drainage
Report Harmony Commons Subdivision”, dated March 11, 2016 and approved by the
City on May 16, 2016.
2.2 Sub-basin Description
Historically, the site drained to the storm system in Lady Moon Drive and Rock Creek
Drive and eventually reaches the Fossil Creek Reservoir Inlet Ditch (FCRID). With the
Harmony Commons development, the majority of the site drains west to south to a new
regional detention pond.
3. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
3.1 Regulations
This report was prepared to meet or exceed the “City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage
Design Criteria Manual” specifications. Where applicable, the criteria established in the
“Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual” (UDFCD), developed by the Denver Regional
Council of Governments, has been used.
3.2 Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA) Discussion
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) recommends a Four Step Process
for receiving water protection that focuses on reducing runoff volumes, treating the water
quality capture volume (WQCV), stabilizing drainageways and implementing long-term
source controls. The Four Step Process applies to the management of smaller, frequently
occurring events.
3
Step 1: Employ Runoff Reduction Practices
To reduce runoff peaks, volumes, and pollutant loads from urbanizing areas, implement
Low Impact Development (LID) strategies, including Minimizing Directly Connected
Impervious Areas (MDCIA).
Runoff from the parking lot and surrounding sidewalks shall drain directly into porous
pavement systems thereby slowing runoff and also promoting infiltration
Step 2: Implement BMPs that Provide a Water Quality Capture Volume with Slow
Release
Once runoff has been minimized, the remaining runoff shall be treated through the porous
pavement system. The porous pavement system allows for settlement of sediments.
Step 3: Stabilize Drainageways
Natural Drainageways are subject to bed and bank erosion due to increases in frequency,
duration, rate and volume of runoff during and following development. Because the site
drains to the master planned regional water quality and detention pond, bank stabilization
is unnecessary with this project.
Step 4: Implement Site Specific and Other Source Control BMPs
Proactively controlling pollutants at their source by preventing pollution rather than
removing contaminants once they have entered the stormwater system or receiving waters
is important when protecting storm systems and receiving waters. This can be
accomplished through site specific needs such as construction site runoff control, post-
construction runoff control and pollution prevention / good housekeeping. It will be the
responsibility of the contractor to develop a procedural best management practice for the
site.
4
3.3 Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
The runoff from this site has been routed to conform to the requirements of the City
Stormwater Department and the approved Harmony Technology and Harmony Commons
drainage plans. Because water quality capture volume from this site will be provided for
in the downstream regional detention and water quality pond 301, water quality facilities
are not required for the site. However, City LID requirements are necessary therefore;
additional water quality will be accomplished through the use of the porous pavement
systems that include 12” of storage in the voids below the pavers. The impervious area
for the site has also already been accounted for in Pond 301 and was assumed to have a C
value of 0.80 and an impervious value of 80%. Please refer to supporting documentation
in Appendix E.
Runoff reduction practices (LID techniques) are also required. No less than fifty percent
of any newly added impervious area must be treated using one or a combination of LID
techniques. The project adds 57,730 sf of new impervious area. Using the porous paver
LID technique, 30,518 sf of new impervious area (53%) will be treated which exceeds the
50% requirement.
No less than twenty five percent of any newly added pavement areas must be treated
using a permeable pavement technology. The project adds 36,195 sf of new pavement
area. This project will incorporate 10,433 sf of porous pavers which is 29% of the newly
added pavement which meets the required 25%.
Please refer to Appendix D for LID calculations and information.
3.4 Hydrologic Criteria
Runoff computations were prepared for the 10-year minor and 100-year major storm
frequency utilizing the rational method.
All hydrologic calculations associated with the basins are included in Appendix B of this
report. Standard Form 8 (SF-8) provides time of concentration calculations for all sub-
basins. Standard Form 9 (SF-9) provides a summary of the design flows for all Sub-
basins and Design Points associated with this site.
5
Water quality capture volume and detention has been provided for in the downstream
regional detention and water quality pond 301.
3.5 Hydraulic Criteria
All hydraulic calculations are presented in Appendix C of this report and are prepared in
accordance with the City of Fort Collins Drainage Criteria. Hydraulic calculations
include inlet capacity spreadsheets and StormCAD calculations.
3.6 Floodplain Regulations Compliance
The project is not within any FEMA or City of Fort Collins mapped floodway; therefore,
Floodplain Regulations Compliance is not required.
3.7 Modifications of Criteria
There are no Modifications of Criteria for this development.
4. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
4.1 General Concept
The majority of the proposed development will be collected and conveyed to the
proposed storm drain system via porous pavement system before being conveyed under
Timberwood Drive to Pond 301. A portion of the site (rood and exterior sidewalks) will
be collected in the existing storm system located in drive aisle to the north.
4.2 Specific Details
A summary of the drainage patterns within each basin is provided in the following
paragraphs. Please refer to Appendix A for the drainage plan.
6
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (LOT 5)
Basin A contains the play yard of the daycare and is calculated to have a 10-year
discharge of 0.4 cfs and a 100-year discharge of 1.8 cfs. Flows from Basin A are captured
by a proposed storm system under the play areas that will discharge to the new storm
system in basin B1 and to the existing system to the west of the development. This
system releases into the existing double 5’x2’ box culvert under Timberwood Drive. This
culvert directs flow south to Pond 301.
Basin B1 is calculated to have a 10-year discharge of 2.9 cfs and a 100-year discharge of
7.3 cfs. Basin B1 contains the parking lot, drive aisle and adjacent sidewalk. Flows from
Basin B1 are captured by the porous paver system with 12” depth where the 100-year
flow will be detained and reduced to 2.3 cfs with an orifice plate on the 15” RCP
discharge pipe.
An underdrain system will release this flow into the proposed 15” RCP system that
discharges to the existing storm system discussed above.
Basin D3 is calculated to have a 10-year discharge of 0.2 cfs and a 100-year discharge of
0.4 cfs. This basin contains the sidewalk and southern half of the drive aisle located to the
north of the proposed building. Flows from this area will drain to the existing 5’ Type R
inlet and storm system located at design point D3. This existing storm system releases
into the existing double 5’x2’ box culvert under Timberwood Drive.
Basin D4 is calculated to have a 10-year discharge of 1.3 cfs and a 100-year discharge of
2.8 cfs. This basin contains the building of Lot 5. Flows from the building roof will be
collected in 12 inch roof drains that will drain to the existing storm system located in the
north drive aisle at design point D3. This existing storm system releases into the existing
double 5’x2’ box culvert under Timberwood Drive.
The weighted average C value of the site is 0.68 which is below the Harmony Tech Park
model assumption of 0.80; therefore, detention is not required on-site and is provided for
in the regional Pond 301 located south of the site. Please refer to Appendix E for
excerpts from the Harmony Tech Park design.
7
5. CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Compliance with Standards
All computations that have been completed within this report are in compliance with the
City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual.
5.2 Drainage Concept
The proposed drainage concepts presented in this report and on the construction plans
adequately provides for stormwater quantity and quality treatment of proposed
impervious areas. Conveyance elements have been designed to pass required flows and
to minimize future maintenance.
If, at the time of construction, groundwater is encountered, a Colorado Department of
Health Construction Dewatering Permit will be required.
6. REFERENCES
1. Interwest Consulting Group, “Final Drainage Report Harmony Commons
Subdivision”, dated March 11, 2016.
2. City of Fort Collins, “Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual Amendments to
the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Criteria Manual”, adopted
December 2011.
3. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, “Urban Storm Drainage Criteria
Manual”, Volumes 1 and 2, dated June 2001, and Volume 3 dated November
2010.
4. JR Engineering, “Final Drainage and Erosion Control Report Harmony
Technology Park Second Filing”, dated June 20, 2001.
5. Stantec Consulting, Inc., “Final Drainage and Erosion Control Study Harmony
Technology Park Site Master Plan”, dated May 19, 2008.
A
APPENDIX A
VICINITY MAP AND DRAINAGE PLAN
B
APPENDIX B
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS
SUMMARY
DRAINAGE SUMMARY TABLE
Design Tributary Area C (10) C (100) tc (10) tc (100) Q(10)tot Q(100)tot
Sub-basin REMARKS
Point (ac) (min) (min) (cfs) (cfs)
A A 0.26 0.56 0.70 5.7 5.0 0.7 1.8 PLAYGROUND STORM SYSTEM
B1 B1 0.84 0.70 0.87 5.0 5.0 2.9 7.3 POROUS PAVERS
B2 B2 0.21 0.82 1.00 5.0 5.0 0.8 2.0 EX 5' TYPE R SUMP INLET
D3 D3 0.08 0.69 0.87 5.0 5.0 0.3 0.7 EX 5' TYPE R SUMP INLET
D4 D4 0.28 0.95 1.00 5.0 5.0 1.3 2.8 ROOF STORM SYSTEM
Page 7
Interwest Consulting Group
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS & % IMPERVIOUS
LOCATION: Lot 5 - Harmony Commons Subdivision
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00
COMPUTATIONS BY: es
DATE: 12/5/2017
Recommended Runoff Coefficients from Table RO-11 of City of Fort Collins Stormwater Code, Volume I
Recommended % Impervious from Table RO-3 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume I
Type B Soils Runoff %
coefficient Impervious
C
Streets, parking lots (asphalt): 0.95 100
Sidewalks (concrete): 0.95 96
Roofs: 0.95 90
Gravel or Pavers: 0.50 40
Landscape Areas (Flat, heavy) : 0.20 0
Landscape Areas (Steep, heavy) : 0.35 0
SUBBASIN TOTAL TOTAL ROOF PAVED PAVERS SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE RUNOFF %
DESIGNATION AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA COEFF. Impervious REMARKS
(ac.) (sq.ft) (sq.ft) (sq.ft) (sq.ft) (sq.ft) (sq.ft) (C)
A 0.26 11,202 0 0 0 5,391 5,811 0.56 46
B1 0.84 36,633 0 19,047 10,433 1,038 6,114 0.70 66
B2 0.21 8,939 0 5,583 0 1,833 1,523 0.82 82
D3 0.08 3,407 0 1,131 0 1,110 1,166 0.69 64
D4 0.28 12,163 12,163 0 0 0 0 0.95 90
TOTAL 1.66 72,344 12,163 25,762 10,433 9,373 14,614 0.73 69 FOR ON-SITE LID CALCULATIONS
Equations
- Calculated C coefficients & % Impervious are area weighted
C = Σ (Ci Ai) / At
Ci = runoff coefficient for specific area, Ai
Ai = areas of surface with runoff coefficient of Ci
n = number of different surfaces to consider
At = total area over which C is applicable; the sum of all Ai's
12-5-17 FC FLOW LOT 5 FDP.xls
Interwest Consulting Group
STANDARD FORM SF-2
TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 2 and 10 YR
LOCATION: Lot 5 - Harmony Commons Subdivision
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00
COMPUTATIONS BY: es
DATE: 12/5/2017
2 and 10-yr storm Cf = 1.00 from Table RO-12 of City of Fort Collins Stormwater Code, Volume I
SUB-BASIN INITIAL /OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME / GUTTER OR CHANNEL FLOW tc CHECK FINAL REMARKS
DATA TIME (ti) (tt) (URBANIZED BASIN) tc
DESIGN SUBBASIN(s) Area C Length Slope ti Length Slope n Vel. tt tc = Total L tc=(l/180)+10
PONIT (ac) (ft) (%) (min) (ft) (%) Manning (ft/s) (min) ti + tt (ft) (min) (min)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) rough. (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)
a A 0.26 0.56 12 2.0 2.8 250 0.5 0.016 1.4 2.9 5.7 262 11.5 5.7
b1 B1 0.84 0.70 20 2.0 2.7 90 0.6 0.03 0.8 1.8 4.5 110 10.6 5.0
b2 B2 0.21 0.82 12 2.0 1.4 225 0.6 0.016 1.6 2.4 3.8 237 11.3 5.0
d3 D3 0.08 0.69 12 2.0 2.1 60 0.6 0.03 0.8 1.2 3.3 72 10.4 5.0
d4 D4 0.28 0.95 60 1.0 2.2 0 0.3 0.03 0.6 0.0 2.2 60 10.3 5.0
EQUATIONS:
tc = ti + tt
ti = [1.87 (1.1 - CCf ) L0.5 ] / S 1/3
tt = L/Vel.
Velocity from Manning's Equation with R=0.1 (corresponds to Figure 3-3 of City of Fort Collins Design Manual)
final tc = minimum of ti + tt and urbanized basin check
min. tc = 5 min. due to limits of IDF curves
12-5-17 FC FLOW LOT 5 FDP.xls
Interwest Consulting Group
STANDARD FORM SF-2
TIME OF CONCENTRATION - 100 YR
LOCATION: Lot 5 - Harmony Commons Subdivision
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00
COMPUTATIONS BY: es
DATE: 12/5/2017
100-yr storm Cf = 1.25 from Table RO-12 of City of Fort Collins Stormwater Code, Volume I
SUB-BASIN INITIAL /OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME / GUTTER OR CHANNEL FLOW tc CHECK FINAL REMARKS
DATA TIME (ti) (tt) (URBANIZED BASIN) tc
DESIGN SUBBASIN(s) Area C C*Cf Length Slope ti Length Slope n Vel. tt tc = Total L tc=(l/180)+10
PONIT (ac) (ft) (%) (min) (ft) (%) Manning (ft/s) (min) ti + tt (ft) (min) (min)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) rough. (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)
a A 0.26 0.56 0.70 12 2.0 2.1 250 0.5 0.016 1.4 2.9 5.0 262 11.5 5.0
b1 B1 0.84 0.70 0.87 20 2.0 1.5 90 0.6 0.03 0.8 1.8 3.3 110 10.6 5.0
b2 B2 0.21 0.82 1.00 12 2.0 0.5 225 0.6 0.016 1.6 2.4 2.9 237 11.3 5.0
d3 D3 0.08 0.69 0.87 12 2.0 1.2 60 0.6 0.03 0.8 1.2 2.4 72 10.4 5.0
d4 D4 0.28 0.95 1.00 60 1.0 1.4 0 0.3 0.03 0.6 0.0 1.4 60 10.3 5.0
EQUATIONS:
tc = ti + tt
ti = [1.87 (1.1 - CCf ) L0.5 ] / S 1/3
tt = L/Vel.
Velocity from Manning's Equation with R=0.1 (corresponds to Figure 3-3 of City of Fort Collins Design Manual)
final tc = minimum of ti + tt and urbanized basin check
min. tc = 5 min. due to limits of IDF curves
12-5-17 FC FLOW LOT 5 FDP.xls
Interwest Consulting Group
RATIONAL METHOD PEAK RUNOFF
(City of Fort Collins, 2-Yr Storm)
LOCATION: Lot 5 - Harmony Commons Subdivision
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00
COMPUTATIONS BY: es
DATE: 12/5/2017
2 yr storm, Cf = 1.00
DIRECT RUNOFF CARRY OVER TOTAL REMARKS
Design Tributary A C Cf tc i Q (2) from Q (2) Q(2)tot
Sub-basin Design
Point (ac) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) Point (cfs) (cfs)
a A 0.26 0.56 5.7 2.70 0.4 0.4
b1 B1 0.84 0.70 5.0 2.85 1.7 1.7
b2 B2 0.21 0.82 5.0 2.85 0.5 0.5
d3 D3 0.08 0.69 5.0 2.85 0.2 0.2
d4 D4 0.28 0.95 5.0 2.85 0.8 0.8
Q = Cf C iA
Q = peak discharge (cfs)
C = runoff coefficient
Cf = frequency adjustment factor
i = rainfall intensity (in/hr) from City of Fort Collins IDF curve (4/16/99)
A = drainage area (acres) i = 24.221 / (10+ tc)0.7968
12-5-17 FC FLOW LOT 5 FDP.xls
Interwest Consulting Group
RATIONAL METHOD PEAK RUNOFF
(City of Fort Collins, 10-Yr Storm)
LOCATION: Lot 5 - Harmony Commons Subdivision
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00
COMPUTATIONS BY: es
DATE: 12/5/2017
10 yr storm, Cf = 1.00
DIRECT RUNOFF CARRY OVER TOTAL REMARKS
Design Tributary A C Cf tc i Q (10) from Q (10) Q(10)tot
Sub-basin Design
Point (ac) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) Point (cfs) (cfs)
a A 0.26 0.56 5.7 4.61 0.7 0.7
b1 B1 0.84 0.70 5.0 4.87 2.9 2.9
b2 B2 0.21 0.82 5.0 4.87 0.8 0.8
d3 D3 0.08 0.69 5.0 4.87 0.3 0.3
d4 D4 0.28 0.95 5.0 4.87 1.3 1.3
Q = Cf C iA
Q = peak discharge (cfs)
C = runoff coefficient
Cf = frequency adjustment factor
i = rainfall intensity (in/hr) from City of Fort Collins IDF curve (4/16/99)
A = drainage area (acres) i = 41.44 / (10+ tc)0.7974
12-5-17 FC FLOW LOT 5 FDP.xls
Interwest Consulting Group
RATIONAL METHOD PEAK RUNOFF
(City of Fort Collins, 100-Yr Storm)
LOCATION: Lot 5 - Harmony Commons Subdivision
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00
COMPUTATIONS BY: es
DATE: 12/5/2017
100 yr storm, Cf = 1.25
DIRECT RUNOFF CARRY OVER TOTAL REMARKS
Des. Area A C Cf tc i Q (100) from Q (100) Q(100)tot
Design
Point Design. (ac) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) Point (cfs) (cfs)
a A 0.26 0.70 5.0 9.95 1.8 1.8
b1 B1 0.84 0.87 5.0 9.95 7.3 7.3
b2 B2 0.21 1.00 5.0 9.95 2.0 2.0
d3 D3 0.08 0.87 5.0 9.95 0.7 0.7
d4 D4 0.28 1.00 5.0 9.95 2.8 2.8
Q = C iA
Q = peak discharge (cfs)
C = runoff coefficient
i = rainfall intensity (in/hr) from City of Fort Collins IDF curve (4/16/99)
A = drainage area (acres) i = 84.682 / (10+ tc)
0.7975
12-5-17 FC FLOW LOT 5 FDP.xls
❞
✣ ★ ✥ ✩ ✪ ✎ ✘ ✏ ✔ ✞ ☛ ☛ ☛ ✙ ✌ ✕ ✟ ✍ ☛ ✆ ✫ ☛ ✂ ✡ ✬ ✎ ✭ ✌ ✍ ✮ ✄ ✞ ✯ ✰ ✟ ✗ ☛ ✱ ☛ ✴ ✓ ✳ ✵ ☛ ✍ ✝ ✔ ✆ ✔ ✌ ☛ ✡ ✌ ✡ ✍ ☛ ✥ ✡ ✗ ✚ ✁ ✂ ✞ ✎ ✆ ✍ ☛ ✎ ✌ ✄ ✡ ☛ ✌ ✝ ✆ ✞ ✏ ✆ ✎ ✂ ✌ ✠ ✠ ✞ ✎ ✟ ✕ ☛ ✆ ✆ ✶
✂ ✑ ☛ ▲ ❑ ❑ ✘ ✔ ☛ ✌ ✍ ✆ ✂ ✎ ✍ ✄ ✍ ✎ ☎ ✂ ✝ ✞ ✒ ✎ ✏ ✍ ☎ ✞ ✎ ✏ ✏ ✕ ✝ ✠ ✠ ✞ ✎ ✂ ✖ ☛ ✂ ✑ ☛ ✆ ✌ ✄ ☛ ✌ ✆ ✂ ✑ ✌ ✂ ✏ ✎ ✍ ✂ ✑ ☛
✣ ❁ ✥ ✪ ☞ ✡ ✔ ✷
❻
⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ❸ ⑨ ⑤ ❷ ⑩ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ❸ ⑦ ⑨ ❶ ❷ ❸ ⑩ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑤ ⑨ ⑨ ❸ ❸ ⑤ ❶ ⑨ ❶ ⑨ ⑤ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑤ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❺ ❶ ⑧ ⑩ ⑦ ⑥ ❶ ⑧ ⑩ ⑧
⑥ ⑥ ❸ ⑧ ❶ ❺ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ❸ ❸ ⑦ ❸ ⑨ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ❶ ⑤ ❹ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑦ ⑦ ❷ ⑤ ⑦ ❷ ❶ ⑥
7DEOH5$
&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQV5DLQIDOO,QWHQVLW\±'XUDWLRQ±)UHTXHQF\7DEOHIRU8VHZLWKWKH5DWLRQDO0HWKRG
❢ ❣ ❤ ✐ ❥ ❦ ❧ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ♠ ❹ ⑥ ❸ ⑨ ♥ ♦ ❦ ♠ ♣ q r s t ✐ ❤ ✉ ♠ ❥ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ t ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ♠ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ❹ ✈ ⑩ ⑨ ⑥ ❶ ❦ ❥ ✇ ♥ ❦ PLQXWHVWRPLQXWHV ♠ ① ② ❤ ♣ ③ ④ r s t ✐ ❤ ✉ ♠ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ❥ t ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦
❹ ❹ ❺ ❺ ♠ ❷ ⑥ ⑧ ⑨ ✈ ❦ ❥ ✇
C
APPENDIX C
HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
Scenario: 100-YR
P12
P-38
P-37
P-36
P35
P34
P33
P32
P26
P11
P9
P23
P22
P20
P25
P24
P10
P2
P8
P17
P13
P18
O-1
MH-12
J1
J2
J3
K3-2
K3-1
K2
K1
E2
E1
F2
F1 D1
D2
D3
D4
C2
I
B3
A
G1, G2, H, L
B2
B1
MH8
MH9
MH10
MH11
MH8
MH1
MH7
MH3
MH6
MH2
MH4
MH5
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
Conduit FlexTable: Combined Pipe/Node Report
Energy
Grade Line
(Out)
(ft)
Energy
Grade Line
(In)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade Line
(Out)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade Line
(In)
(ft)
Slope
(Calculat
ed)
(ft/ft)
Invert
(Stop)
(ft)
Invert
(Start)
(ft)
Velocity
(ft/s)
Flow
(cfs)
Diam
eter
(in)
Length Material
(Unified)
(ft)
Stop
Node
Start
Node
Label
P4 MH3 MH2 62.5 Concrete 43.90 4.11 7.80 7.91 -0.002 11.09 10.97 11.40 11.28
P13 MH7 MH3 60.5 Concrete 24.0 12.20 3.88 8.07 7.95 0.002 11.57 11.40 11.81 11.63
P17 MH8 MH3 213.5 Concrete 18.0 5.90 3.34 8.61 7.95 0.003 12.07 11.40 12.24 11.57
P5 MH4 MH3 90.0 Concrete 25.80 2.41 8.16 7.80 0.004 11.45 11.40 11.56 11.50
P6 MH5 MH4 69.0 Concrete 30.0 23.50 4.79 8.36 8.16 0.003 11.79 11.56 12.14 11.92
P7 MH6 MH5 145.5 Concrete 30.0 20.50 4.18 8.68 8.36 0.002 12.51 12.14 12.78 12.41
G1, G2, MH6 17.0 Concrete 30.0 20.50 4.18 8.96 8.68 0.016 12.69 12.64 12.96 12.91
P8 H, L
P2 MH1 I 142.0 Concrete 50.50 4.73 7.38 7.15 0.002 9.97 9.65 10.41 10.11
P3 MH2 MH1 145.0 Concrete 50.50 7.17 7.91 7.38 0.004 10.54 10.24 10.97 10.64
P10 B2 MH2 14.7 Concrete 18.0 5.60 3.17 8.19 8.01 0.012 11.01 10.97 11.17 11.13
P1 I O-1 110.0 Concrete 57.50 5.75 7.15 6.71 0.004 9.24 8.80 9.75 9.31
P9 MH2 B3 14.6 Concrete 18.0 1.00 0.57 8.01 8.45 -0.030 10.97 10.97 10.98 10.98
P11 B2 B1 20.3 Concrete 15.0 3.60 2.93 8.25 8.47 -0.011 11.17 11.11 11.31 11.24
P16 MH7 C2 14.2 Concrete 18.0 2.60 1.47 8.17 8.40 -0.016 11.75 11.74 11.78 11.77
P18 MH8 D3 30.3 Concrete 18.0 5.90 3.34 8.61 8.47 0.005 12.27 12.17 12.44 12.35
P19 D3 D2 28.3 Concrete 18.0 2.40 1.36 8.47 8.70 -0.008 12.42 12.41 12.45 12.44
P20 D2 D1 22.0 Concrete 18.0 1.60 0.91 8.70 8.73 -0.001 12.45 12.44 12.46 12.45
Conduit FlexTable: Combined Pipe/Node Report
Energy
Grade Line
(Out)
(ft)
Energy
Grade Line
(In)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade Line
(Out)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade Line
(In)
(ft)
Slope
(Calculat
ed)
(ft/ft)
Invert
(Stop)
(ft)
Invert
(Start)
(ft)
Velocity
(ft/s)
Flow
(cfs)
Diam
eter
(in)
Length Material
(Unified)
(ft)
Stop
Node
Start
Node
Label
P-36 MH-12 K3-1 75.9 Concrete 15.0 2.70 2.20 9.48 10.14 -0.009 13.04 12.91 13.12 12.98
P-37 K3-1 K3-2 75.9 Concrete 15.0 1.35 1.10 10.14 10.80 -0.009 13.11 13.08 13.13 13.10
P-38 J1 MH10 20.8 Concrete 18.0 0.60 0.34 9.14 8.93 0.010 12.52 12.52 12.53 12.53
P21 D4 D3 10.0 PVC 12.0 2.80 3.57 8.82 8.47 0.035 12.45 12.41 12.64 12.61
P12 A B1 62.0 Concrete 15.0 1.80 1.47 8.77 8.47 0.005 11.30 11.25 11.33 11.29
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 2 of 2
+1-203-755-1666
12/18/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
FlexTable: Conduit Table
Hydraulic
Grade Line
(Out)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade
Line (In)
(ft)
Velocity
(ft/s)
Capacity
(Full
Flow)
(cfs)
Flow
(cfs)
Manning's
n
Diam
eter
(in)
Section
Type
Slope
(Calcula
ted)
(ft/ft)
Length
(Unified)
(ft)
Invert
(Stop)
(ft)
Stop
Node
Invert
(Start)
(ft)
Label Start Node
P1 I 7.15 O-1 6.71 110.0 0.004 Box 0.013 57.50 57.76 5.75 9.24 8.80
P2 MH1 7.38 I 7.15 142.0 0.002 Ellipse 0.013 50.50 41.01 4.73 9.97 9.65
P3 MH2 7.91 MH1 7.38 145.0 0.004 Ellipse 0.013 50.50 61.61 7.17 10.54 10.24
P4 MH3 7.80 MH2 7.91 62.5 -0.002 Ellipse 0.013 43.90 42.75 4.11 11.09 10.97
P5 MH4 8.16 MH3 7.80 90.0 0.004 Ellipse 0.013 25.80 64.45 2.41 11.45 11.40
P6 MH5 8.36 MH4 8.16 69.0 0.003 Circle 30.0 0.013 23.50 22.08 4.79 11.79 11.56
P7 MH6 8.68 MH5 8.36 145.5 0.002 Circle 30.0 0.013 20.50 19.23 4.18 12.51 12.14
P8 G1, G2, H, L 8.96 MH6 8.68 17.0 0.016 Circle 30.0 0.013 20.50 52.64 4.18 12.69 12.64
P9 MH2 8.01 B3 8.45 14.6 -0.030 Circle 18.0 0.013 1.00 18.21 0.57 10.97 10.97
P10 B2 8.19 MH2 8.01 14.7 0.012 Circle 18.0 0.013 5.60 11.64 3.17 11.01 10.97
P11 B2 8.25 B1 8.47 20.3 -0.011 Circle 15.0 0.013 3.60 6.72 2.93 11.17 11.11
P12 A 8.77 B1 8.47 62.0 0.005 Circle 15.0 0.013 1.80 4.49 1.47 11.30 11.25
P13 MH7 8.07 MH3 7.95 60.5 0.002 Circle 24.0 0.013 12.20 10.07 3.88 11.57 11.40
P16 MH7 8.17 C2 8.40 14.2 -0.016 Circle 18.0 0.013 2.60 13.38 1.47 11.75 11.74
P17 MH8 8.61 MH3 7.95 213.5 0.003 Circle 18.0 0.013 5.90 5.84 3.34 12.07 11.40
P18 MH8 8.61 D3 8.47 30.3 0.005 Circle 18.0 0.013 5.90 7.14 3.34 12.27 12.17
P19 D3 8.47 D2 8.70 28.3 -0.008 Circle 18.0 0.013 2.40 9.46 1.36 12.42 12.41
P20 D2 8.70 D1 8.73 22.0 -0.001 Circle 18.0 0.013 1.60 3.88 0.91 12.45 12.44
P21 D4 8.82 D3 8.47 10.0 0.035 Circle 12.0 0.010 2.80 8.66 3.57 12.45 12.41
P22 MH4 9.26 E2 9.51 28.5 -0.009 Circle 18.0 0.013 0.70 9.84 0.40 11.56 11.56
FlexTable: Conduit Table
Hydraulic
Grade Line
(Out)
(ft)
Hydraulic
Grade
Line (In)
(ft)
Velocity
(ft/s)
Capacity
(Full
Flow)
(cfs)
Flow
(cfs)
Manning's
n
Diam
eter
(in)
Section
Type
Slope
(Calcula
ted)
(ft/ft)
Length
(Unified)
(ft)
Invert
(Stop)
(ft)
Stop
Node
Invert
(Start)
(ft)
Label Start Node
P35 MH-12 9.48 J3 9.96 193.4 -0.002 Circle 15.0 0.013 4.00 3.22 3.26 13.65 12.91
P-36 MH-12 9.48 K3-1 10.14 75.9 -0.009 Circle 15.0 0.013 2.70 6.02 2.20 13.04 12.91
P-37 K3-1 10.14 K3-2 10.80 75.9 -0.009 Circle 15.0 0.013 1.35 6.02 1.10 13.11 13.08
P-38 J1 9.14 MH10 8.93 20.8 0.010 Circle 18.0 0.013 0.60 10.55 0.34 12.52 12.52
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 2 of 2
+1-203-755-1666
12/18/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
FlexTable: Catch Basin Table
Energy Grade
Line (Out)
(ft)
Energy Grade
Line (In)
(ft)
Hydraulic Grade
Line (Out)
(ft)
Hydraulic Grade
Line (In)
(ft)
Flow (Additional
Subsurface)
(cfs)
Elevation
(Invert)
(ft)
Elevation (Rim)
(ft)
Elevation
(Ground)
(ft)
ID Label
1 B2 12.99 13.49 8.19 0.00 11.11 11.01 11.24 11.17
G1, G2, 10.65 14.01 8.96 0.00 12.69 12.69 12.96 12.96
2 H, L
11 I 13.80 13.80 7.15 7.00 9.65 9.24 10.11 9.75
141 B1 12.80 12.80 8.47 0.00 11.25 11.17 11.29 11.31
142 A 12.80 12.80 8.77 0.00 11.30 11.30 11.33 11.33
143 B3 12.85 13.35 8.45 0.00 10.97 10.97 10.98 10.98
148 C2 13.00 13.50 8.40 0.00 11.75 11.75 11.78 11.78
155 D4 14.18 14.18 8.82 0.00 12.45 12.45 12.64 12.64
156 D3 12.77 13.27 8.47 0.00 12.41 12.27 12.44 12.44
157 D2 12.80 13.30 8.70 0.00 12.44 12.42 12.45 12.45
158 D1 13.13 13.63 8.73 0.00 12.45 12.45 12.46 12.46
164 F1 12.90 12.90 9.15 0.00 12.15 12.15 12.16 12.16
165 F2 13.02 13.02 9.12 0.00 12.15 12.15 12.16 12.16
166 E1 12.89 12.89 9.64 0.00 11.57 11.57 11.58 11.58
167 E2 12.81 12.81 9.51 0.00 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56
195 K1 13.40 13.90 9.19 0.00 12.52 12.52 12.52 12.52
196 K2 13.23 13.73 9.39 0.00 12.73 12.73 12.74 12.74
197 J2 14.10 14.60 9.26 0.00 12.73 12.73 12.74 12.74
198 K3-2 13.30 14.50 10.80 0.00 13.11 13.11 13.13 13.13
199 J3 14.50 13.80 9.96 0.00 13.65 13.65 13.82 13.82
209 K3-1 13.30 14.50 10.14 0.00 13.08 13.04 13.10 13.12
212 MH-12 13.30 14.50 9.48 0.00 12.91 12.87 12.98 12.94
213 J1 14.03 14.53 9.14 0.00 12.52 12.52 12.53 12.53
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/18/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
FlexTable: Manhole Table
Energy Grade
Line (Out)
(ft)
Energy Grade
Line (In)
(ft)
Hydraulic Grade
Line (In)
(ft)
Hydraulic Grade
Line (Out)
(ft)
Flow (Total
Out)
(cfs)
Elevation
(Invert)
(ft)
Bolted
Cover?
Elevation (Rim)
(ft)
Elevation
(Ground)
(ft)
Label
MH3 13.70 13.70 False 7.80 43.90 11.09 11.40 11.50 11.40
MH1 14.38 14.38 False 7.38 50.50 9.97 10.24 10.64 10.41
MH5 13.61 13.61 False 8.36 23.50 11.79 12.14 12.41 12.14
MH4 13.41 13.41 False 8.16 25.80 11.45 11.56 11.57 11.56
MH2 13.26 13.26 False 7.91 50.50 10.54 10.97 10.98 10.97
MH7 13.22 13.22 False 8.07 12.20 11.57 11.74 11.88 11.81
MH8 13.71 13.71 False 8.61 5.90 12.07 12.17 12.35 12.24
MH6 14.68 14.68 False 8.68 20.50 12.51 12.64 12.91 12.78
MH8 14.20 14.20 False 8.72 9.60 12.05 12.17 12.31 12.19
MH9 14.20 14.20 False 8.81 9.60 12.22 12.29 12.43 12.36
MH10 14.11 14.11 False 8.93 9.60 12.38 12.52 12.52 12.52
MH11 14.21 14.21 False 9.09 8.60 12.61 12.73 12.73 12.73
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/18/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
FlexTable: Outfall Table
Energy Grade
Line
(ft)
Flow (Total Out)
(cfs)
Hydraulic Grade
(ft)
Elevation (User
Defined Tailwater)
(ft)
Elevation
(Invert)
(ft)
Set Rim to
Ground
Elevation?
Elevation
(Ground)
(ft)
Label
O-1 9.22 True 6.71 8.80 8.80 57.50 8.80
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/18/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - 0-1 TO G1,G2,H,L (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - B3 TO A (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - C2 TO D1 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - D4 TO MH3 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - E1 TO E2 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - F1 TO F2 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - J1 TO K1 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - J2 TO K2 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - MH12 TO J3 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
Profile Report
Engineering Profile - K3-2 TO MH12 (12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw)
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 1
+1-203-755-1666
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
D
APPENDIX D
WATER QUALITY
AND
LID INFORMATION
New Impervious Area 57,730 acre/sq. ft.
Required Minimum Impervious Area to be Treated 28,865 acre/sq. ft.
Ratio
Area of Paver Section #1 (BASIN B1) 10,433 acre/sq. ft.
Pavement area for Paver Section #1 19,047 acre/sq. ft.
Other Impervious Area Treated by LID Treatment Method #1 1,038 acre/sq. ft.
Total Impervious Area Treated 30,518 acre/sq. ft. 1.9
Actual % On-Site Treated by LID 53 %
New Pavement Area 36,195 acre/sq. ft.
Required Minimum Area of Porous Pavement 9,049 acre/sq. ft.
Area of Paver Section #1 10,433 acre/sq. ft.
Total Porous Pavement Area 10,433 acre/sq. ft.
Actual % of Porous Pavement Provided 29 %
NOTE: City recommended ratio is 3:1 for impervious areas. All pavement areas are less than 3:1. Total areas vary.
50% On-Site Treatment by LID Requirement
25% Porous Pavement Requirement
LID Table
New Impervious Area 57,730 acre/sq. ft.
Required Minimum Impervious Area to be Treated 28,865 acre/sq. ft.
Ratio
Area of Paver Section #1 (BASIN B1) 10,433 acre/sq. ft.
Pavement area for Paver Section #1 19,047 acre/sq. ft.
Other Impervious Area Treated by LID Treatment Method #1 1,038 acre/sq. ft.
Total Impervious Area Treated 30,518 acre/sq. ft. 1.9
Actual % On-Site Treated by LID 53 %
New Pavement Area 36,195 acre/sq. ft.
Required Minimum Area of Porous Pavement 9,049 acre/sq. ft.
Area of Paver Section #1 10,433 acre/sq. ft.
Total Porous Pavement Area 10,433 acre/sq. ft.
Actual % of Porous Pavement Provided 29 %
NOTE: City recommended ratio is 3:1 for impervious areas. All pavement areas are less than 3:1. Total areas vary.
50% On-Site Treatment by LID Requirement
25% Porous Pavement Requirement
LID Table
FLOW REDUCTION CALCULATIONS BASED ON PAVER VOLUME
Rational Volumetric (FAA) Method
OVERALL 100-Year Event
LOCATION: HC Lot 5 Basin B1 Paver Area 10433 ft
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00 Void Depth 1 ft
COMPUTATIONS BY: es 30% Void 3130 cf
DATE: 12/11/2017
Equations: Area trib. to pavers = 36633 sf
Developed flow = QD
= CIA C (100) = 0.87
Vol. In = Vi = T C I A = T QD
Developed C A = 31871 sf
Vol. Out = Vo =K QPO
T Release rate, QPO
= 1.8 cfs
storage = S = Vi - Vo K = 0.9
Rainfall intensity from City of Fort Collins IDF Curve with (3.67") rainfall
Storm Rainfall QD
Vol. In Vol. Out Storage
Duration, T Intensity, I (cfs) Vi Vo S
(min) (in/hr) (ft3) (ft3) (ft3)
5 9.95 7.3 2184 473 1711
6 9.31 6.8 2452 567 1885
7 8.80 6.4 2704 662 2043
8 8.38 6.1 2943 756 2187
9 8.03 5.9 3173 851 2322
10 7.72 5.6 3389 945 2444
11 7.42 5.4 3583 1040 2544
12 7.16 5.2 3772 1134 2638
13 6.92 5.1 3949 1229 2721
14 6.71 4.9 4124 1323 2801
15 6.52 4.8 4293 1418 2876
16 6.30 4.6 4425 1512 2913
17 6.10 4.5 4552 1607 2946
18 5.92 4.3 4678 1701 2977
19 5.75 4.2 4796 1796 3000
20 5.60 4.1 4917 1890 3027
21 5.46 4.0 5033 1985 3049
22 5.32 3.9 5138 2079 3059
23 5.20 3.8 5250 2174 3077
24 5.09 3.7 5363 2268 3095
25 4.98 3.6 5465 2363 3103
26 4.87 3.6 5558 2457 3101
27 4.78 3.5 5666 2552 3114
28 4.69 3.4 5765 2646 3119
29 4.60 3.4 5856 2741 3116
30 4.52 3.3 5953 2835 3118
31 4.42 3.2 6015 2930 3086
32 4.33 3.2 6083 3024 3059
33 4.24 3.1 6142 3119 3024
34 4.16 3.0 6209 3213 2996
35 4.08 3.0 6269 3308 2961
36 4.01 2.9 6337 3402 2935
37 3.93 2.9 6383 3497 2887
38 3.87 2.8 6456 3591 2865
39 3.80 2.8 6506 3686 2820
40 3.74 2.7 6567 3780 2787
41 3.68 2.7 6623 3875 2749
42 3.62 2.6 6674 3969 2705
43 3.56 2.6 6720 4064 2657
BASIN B1
100-yr Event, Outlet Sizing
LOCATION: HARMONY COMMONS, LOT 5
PROJECT NO: 1339-178-00
COMPUTATIONS BY: es
SUBMITTED BY: INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP
DATE: 12/11/2017
Submerged Orifice Outlet:
release rate is described by the orifice equation,
Qo = CoAo sqrt( 2g(h-Eo))
where Qo = orifice outflow (cfs)
Co = orifice discharge coefficient
g = gravitational acceleration = 32.20 ft/s
Ao = effective area of the orifice (ft2)
Eo = greater of geometric center elevation of the orifice or d/s HGL (ft)
h = water surface elevation (ft)
Qo = 1.80 cfs
outlet pipe dia = D = 15.0 in
Invert elev. = 4908.47 ft (inv. "D" on outlet structure)
Eo = 4911.15 ft (downstream HGL for peak 100 yr flow - from FlowMaster)
h = 4912.80 ft - 100 yr WSEL
Co = 0.65
solve for effective area of orifice using the orifice equation
Ao = 0.269 ft2
= 38.7 in2
orifice dia. = d = 7.02 in
Check orifice discharge coefficient using Figure 5-21 (Hydraulic Engineering )
d/ D = 0.47
kinematic viscosity, v = 1.22E-05 ft2/s
Reynolds no. = Red = 4Q/(πdv ) = 3.21E+05
Co = (K in figure) = 0.65 check
Use d = 7 in
A o = 0.267 ft 2 = 38.48 in 2
Qmax = 1.79 cfs
B1 orifice - 100yr, 12-5-17 orifice.xls
E
APPENDIX E
EXCERPTS FROM REFERENCE REPORTS
44 3.51 2.6 6780 4158 2622
45 3.46 2.5 6835 4253 2583
46 3.41 2.5 6886 4347 2539
47 3.36 2.5 6933 4442 2491
48 3.31 2.4 6975 4536 2439
49 3.27 2.4 7034 4631 2403
50 3.23 2.4 7090 4725 2365
51 3.18 2.3 7120 4820 2300
52 3.14 2.3 7168 4914 2254
53 3.10 2.3 7213 5009 2204
54 3.07 2.2 7278 5103 2175
55 3.03 2.2 7316 5198 2118
56 2.99 2.2 7350 5292 2058
57 2.96 2.2 7407 5387 2020
58 2.96 2.2 7537 5481 2056
59 2.89 2.1 7485 5576 1910
60 2.86 2.1 7533 5670 1863
Storage Volume for Design Flow: 3119 ft3
12-5-17 FAA POND PAVER FLOW REDUCTION 1FT DEEP.xls,HTP B1
P23 MH4 9.26 E1 9.64 27.8 -0.014 Circle 18.0 0.013 1.60 12.28 0.91 11.57 11.56
P24 MH5 8.51 F2 9.12 27.4 -0.022 Circle 18.0 0.013 1.40 15.68 0.79 12.15 12.14
P25 MH5 8.51 F1 9.15 25.8 -0.025 Circle 18.0 0.013 1.60 16.53 0.91 12.15 12.14
P26 MH7 8.07 MH8 8.72 173.5 -0.004 Circle 24.0 0.013 9.60 13.85 3.06 12.05 11.74
P27 MH8 8.72 MH9 8.81 28.0 -0.003 Circle 24.0 0.013 9.60 12.82 3.06 12.22 12.17
P28 MH9 8.81 MH10 8.93 49.9 -0.002 Circle 24.0 0.013 9.60 11.09 3.06 12.38 12.29
P29 MH10 8.93 MH11 9.09 61.6 -0.003 Circle 24.0 0.013 8.60 11.53 2.74 12.61 12.52
P30 MH11 9.09 MH-12 9.48 156.3 -0.002 Circle 24.0 0.013 6.70 11.30 2.13 12.87 12.73
P32 MH10 8.93 K1 9.19 26.0 -0.010 Circle 18.0 0.013 0.40 10.50 0.23 12.52 12.52
P33 MH11 9.09 K2 9.39 30.0 -0.010 Circle 18.0 0.013 0.90 10.50 0.51 12.73 12.73
P34 MH11 9.09 J2 9.26 18.9 -0.009 Circle 18.0 0.013 1.00 9.96 0.57 12.73 12.73
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 2
+1-203-755-1666
12/18/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
P24 MH5 F2 27.4 Concrete 18.0 1.40 0.79 8.51 9.12 -0.022 12.15 12.14 12.16 12.15
P25 MH5 F1 25.8 Concrete 18.0 1.60 0.91 8.51 9.15 -0.025 12.15 12.14 12.16 12.16
P22 MH4 E2 28.5 Concrete 18.0 0.70 0.40 9.26 9.51 -0.009 11.56 11.56 11.56 11.56
P23 MH4 E1 27.8 Concrete 18.0 1.60 0.91 9.26 9.64 -0.014 11.57 11.56 11.58 11.57
P26 MH7 MH8 173.5 Concrete 24.0 9.60 3.06 8.07 8.72 -0.004 12.05 11.74 12.19 11.88
P27 MH8 MH9 28.0 Concrete 24.0 9.60 3.06 8.72 8.81 -0.003 12.22 12.17 12.36 12.31
P28 MH9 MH10 49.9 Concrete 24.0 9.60 3.06 8.81 8.93 -0.002 12.38 12.29 12.52 12.43
P29 MH10 MH11 61.6 Concrete 24.0 8.60 2.74 8.93 9.09 -0.003 12.61 12.52 12.73 12.64
P30 MH11 MH-12 156.3 Concrete 24.0 6.70 2.13 9.09 9.48 -0.002 12.87 12.73 12.94 12.80
P35 MH-12 J3 193.4 Concrete 15.0 4.00 3.26 9.48 9.96 -0.002 13.65 12.91 13.82 13.07
P32 MH10 K1 26.0 Concrete 18.0 0.40 0.23 8.93 9.19 -0.010 12.52 12.52 12.52 12.52
P33 MH11 K2 30.0 Concrete 18.0 0.90 0.51 9.09 9.39 -0.010 12.73 12.73 12.74 12.73
P34 MH11 J2 18.9 Concrete 18.0 1.00 0.57 9.09 9.26 -0.009 12.73 12.73 12.74 12.73
27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA Page 1 of 2
+1-203-755-1666
12/18/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
12/13/2017
Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 3)
12-19-17 PDP MAIN REDUCED (LOT 5 FDP).stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.03.84]
♥ ❦ ♠ ① ② ❤ ♣ ③ ④ ④ r s t ✐ ❤ ✉ ♠ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ❥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ t ⑨ ❸ ⑥ ❹ ♠ ⑥ ❸ ⑨ ❷ ✈ ❦ ❥ ✇ ♥ ❦ ♠ ① ② ❤ ♣
❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ⑤ ❷ ⑩ ⑧ ❶ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❺ ⑩ ⑤ ❷ ❹ ❶ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❶ ❶ ⑧ ⑧ ⑦ ❺ ❷ ❸ ❶ ❷ ⑨ ⑨ ❸ ❸ ❸ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❺ ❺ ❶ ⑧ ⑦ ⑧ ⑧ ❹ ❸ ⑩
⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ❺ ❹ ⑥ ❸ ⑨ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ⑩ ⑤ ⑨ ⑥ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑧ ⑩ ⑩ ⑩ ⑦ ⑧ ❸ ⑩ ⑨ ⑥ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑩ ❷ ❷ ⑤ ⑤ ⑨ ⑧ ⑥ ❷ ❹
⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑤ ❷ ⑩ ⑧ ❶ ⑦ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❶ ❶ ❶ ❶ ❶ ❶ ⑧ ❷ ⑤ ⑨ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❷ ❷ ❷ ❷ ⑦ ❷ ❶ ⑩ ⑨ ⑥ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑨ ⑨ ❸ ❸ ⑥ ❷ ❹ ❷ ❹ ⑩
⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ❺ ❹ ⑥ ❸ ⑨ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❶ ❶ ⑧ ⑧ ⑦ ❶ ⑥ ❹ ❶ ⑧ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑦ ⑤ ⑧ ❷ ⑨ ⑥ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑥ ❹ ❹ ❺ ⑦ ❹ ❸ ⑧ ⑨ ⑩
⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ❷ ⑩ ⑧ ❶ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ❺ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑧ ⑧ ⑧ ⑧ ⑧ ⑩ ❷ ⑤ ⑨ ❸ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ⑧ ⑩ ⑤ ❸ ⑥ ❸ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❺ ❶ ❶ ❶ ⑧ ❸ ❶ ❷ ❷ ❶
✣ ▲ ✩ ✥ ✪ ✞ ☛ ✕ ✫ ✬ ✭ ✮ ✯ ✰ ✱ ❆ ✳ ✴ ✝ ✆ ❷ ❺ ✌ ✡ ✡ ☛ ✡ ✚ ✂ ✎ ✍ ☛ ✌ ✡ ✌ ✆ ❺ ✏ ✎ ⑦ ⑧ ✠ ⑥ ✠ ✎ ✕ ✆ ✶ ❹ ⑦ ⑨ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧ ❷
❂ ✷ ,QWHQVLW\❑ ✑ ✘ ☛ ✌ ✑ ✞ ✔ ✡ ☛ ✂ ▲ ✎ 'XUDWLRQ)❑ ✒ ❑ ✍ ✘ ✌ ✔ ☞ ☛ ✑ ✌ ✍ ✝ ✞ ✜ ☞ ✝ ☎ ✂ ✔ ✂ ✎ UHTXHQF\✎ ☞ ✏ ✂ ✦ ✝ ✎ ✎ ✞ ✍ ✂ ✄ ✜ ☎ ✎ &✆ ✠ ✂ ✠ ✝ XUYHVIRU6:✖ ✞ ☛ ✆ ✍ ✆ ✌ ☛ ✝ ✠ ✞
☛ ✟ ✏ ✌ ✂ ☛ ✠ ✠ ✡ ☛ ✕ ✓ ☛ ✑ 00 ✞ ☛ ✂ ✞ ✆ ✟ ✌ ✍ ✍ ☛ ☛ ✌ ☞ ✂ ✝ ✍ ✞ ✎ ✒ ✓ ✝ ❝ ✡ ❼ ☛ ✡ ✽ ✝ ✞ ✽ ✷ ✌ ✝ ✞ ✖ ☞ ✠ ☛ ☎ ✂ ▼ ✏ ✪ ✝ ✠ ✘ ☛ ❏ ✆ ✗ ✗ ✸ ✔ ☛ ✂ ✎ ✒ ✍ ✌ ☞ ✑ ✆ ✏ ✎ ✍ ✂ ✑ ☛ ✩ ✘ ✚ ❂ ✘ ✚ ▲
❑ ✘ ✚ ✩ ❂ ✘ ✚
6WRUP3URYLVLRQV 0LQRU ☛ ✎ ✌ ✑ ✌ ✄ ✞ ✞ ☛ ✍ ☛ ✡ ✌ ✎ ✕ ✆ ✆ ✒ ✂ ✚ ✖ ☛ ✎ ✛ ✫ ✍ <✍ ☛ ✝ ✬ ✌ ✓ ✄ ✟ ✭ ✞ ☛ ✂ ✮ ✝ ✡ ✍ ✯ ✡ ✓ ✆ ✰ HDU ✍ ☛ ✚ ✂ ✱ ✌ ✎ ✆ ✆ ✝ ✂ ✴ ✞ ✎ ✍ ✍ ✳ ✌ ☛ ☛ ❄ ✏ ✒ ✌ ✡ ✆ ☛
✄ ✝ ☎ ✆ ☎ ✟ ✆ ✆ ✟ ✌ ☛ ✔ ✚ ✑ ✡ ✆ ✌ ✄ ✡ ✂ ✞ ✡ ☛ ☛ ✌ ✡ ✍ ✄ ✡ ✌ ✝ ✞ ✚ ✡ ✝ ✞ ✂ ✄ ✂ ☛ ☛ ✎ ✌ ✂ ✞ ✌ ☛ ✒ ✍ ✌ ✔ ✞ ☛ ☛ ✞ ✂ ✌ ✝ ✝ ✆ ✟ ✞ ✎ ✡ ✔ ☛ ✟ ✞ ✆ ✌ ✠ ✟ ✂ ☎ ✆ ✏ ☛ ✎ ✌ ✡ ✏ ✄ ✟ ✆ ✎ ☛ ✂ ✝ ✠ ✆ ✠
✆ ✠ ☞ ✝ ✎ ✂ ☎ ✝ ✠ ✝ ✞ ✕ ✌ ✟ ☛ ✞ ✑ ✆ ✆ ✎ ✗ ✞ ✶ ✍ ✏ ✝ ✡ ✌ ✞ ✟ ☛ ✒ ✝ ✍ ✠ ✝ ✌ ✂ ✂ ✎ ✍ ✝ ☛ ☛ ✆ ✟ ✂ ✍ ✎ ✌ ☛ ✆ ✌ ✄ ✂ ✟ ☛ ☎ ✝ ✞ ✍ ✌ ✝ ✖ ✞ ✄ ✌ ✎ ✝ ✞ ❡ ✍ ✡ ☛ ✡ ☛ ✒ ✝ ✍ ✞ ☎ ✠ ✟ ✔ ✂ ✎ ✂ ☛ ✡ ✞ ✍
✍ ✓ ✚ ✌ ☛ ✆ ✝ ✞ ✞ ✂ ✎ ✝ ✌ ☛ ✍ ✒ ✄ ✞ ☛ ✟ ☛ ✆ ✆ ☛ ✚ ✔ ✕ ✆ ✂ ✎ ✂ ☛ ☛ ✍ ✄ ☞ ✚ ✍ ✎ ✎ ✌ ☞ ✂ ✂ ☛ ☛ ✟ ✌ ✞ ✂ ✍ ✟ ✌ ☛ ✑ ✒ ✌ ✌ ✌ ✆ ✞ ✎ ✝ ✞ ✞ ✞ ✆ ☛ ✌ ✂ ✠ ✖ ✆ ✍ ✠ ✚ ☛ ☛ ✡ ✟ ✍ ✟ ☎ ✌ ✎ ✍ ✝ ✍ ✆ ✞ ✝
✂ ✞ ✌ ✗ ✒ ✒ ☛ ✷ ✄ ✕ ✑ ✝ ☛ ✌ ✞ ✔ ✎ ✩ ✆ ✍ ✘ ✚
✣ ❂ ✥ ✫ ✡ ✡ ✟ ✷ 0DMRU ✎ ✬ ✌ ☛ ✑ ✭ ✄ ✂ ✎ ☛ ☛ ✮ ✍ ✯ ✞ ✌ ✡ ✰ ✎ ✒ ✂ ✝ ✱ ✝ ✖ ✞ ☛ ✎ ✛ <✌ ✗ ✵ ✞ ☛ ✂ ✟ ✳ ☛ ✽ ❀ ✏ ✂ ✡ ✌ ✝ ✓ ✝ ✌ ✟ ✡ ✆ ✛ ☛ ✝ ✠ ✎ ✍ ✆ ✡ ✝ ✌ HDU ✍ ✂ ☛ ✝ ✝ ✎ ✞ ✠ ✡ ☛ ☛
✏ ✆ ✌ ✍
6WRUP3URYLVLRQV ✂ ✌ ✗ ✒ ✂ ☛ ✑ ✝ ☛ ✡ ✞ ✷ ☛ ✌ ✆ ✝ ✑ ✞ ✔ ✒ ▲ ☛ ✆ ☛ ❑ ✝ ✂ ✟ ✂ ❑ ☛ ✆ ✆ ✎ ✔ ✘ ✄ ✍ ☛ ✔ ✆ ✍ ✞ ☛ ✂ ☛ ✝ ☛ ✂ ✌ ✆ ✠ ✝ ✄ ✌ ✍ ✍ ✡ ✂ ☛ ✆ ✝ ✆ ☛ ✂ ✎ ✂ ✔ ✆ ✄ ✎ ✞ ✝ ✗ ✒ ✍ ✌ ✖ ✄ ✞ ✔ ☛
☛ ✂ ✡ ✝ ✡ ✕ ✞ ✍ ✌ ✟ ☛ ✌ ✞ ✠ ☛ ✝ ☎ ✞ ✡ ✞ ✡ ✌ ✟ ☛ ✂ ✒ ✑ ✎ ☛ ✆ ☛ ✞ ✂ ✎ ✆ ✆ ✄ ✂ ✔ ✍ ✍ ✄ ✝ ✆ ☎ ✞ ✂ ✟ ☛ ✎ ✆ ✂ ✄ ✍ ☛ ☛ ✡ ✕ ✌ ☞ ✗ ✞ ☛ ✠ ✡ ✍ ✌ ✆ ✞ ✄ ✚ ✞ ✎ ✌ ✝ ☞ ✛ ✞ ✎ ☛ ✒ ✍ ✞ ✌ ✆ ✟ ✂ ✍ ✑ ✎ ☛
✌ ✍ ✄ ✂ ✞ ✎ ✞ ✆ ☛ ☛ ✔ ✠ ✠ ✆ ✆ ✝ ✚ ✄ ✂ ☛ ✡ ✝ ✄ ✍ ✞ ✌ ✌ ✝ ✄ ✂ ✞ ☛ ✌ ☎ ✒ ✆ ✆ ☎ ☛ ✂ ✕ ✖ ✖ ✆ ☛ ✌ ✂ ✔ ✌ ✌ ✞ ✆ ✞ ✚ ✂ ✌ ✝ ☞ ✠ ✌ ✔ ✎ ✠ ❡ ✞ ✠ ☛ ✡ ✎ ✡ ✆ ✆ ✚ ✆ ✂ ✎ ✍ ✎ ✝ ✓ ☛ ✏ ☛ ✞ ✠ ✍ ✆ ✝ ✆ ✏ ☎
✚ ☛ ✍ ✆ ☛ ✂ ✎ ✍ ✂ ✍ ☛ ✑ ✌ ✌ ☞ ✄ ✂ ✍ ✎ ✌ ✆ ☞ ✚ ✕ ☛ ✌ ✍ ☛ ✞ ✂ ✠ ✡ ✔ ✠
✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ❏ ❇ ❅ ❃ ▲ ❑ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✥ ✫ ✫ ✫ ✫ ✫ ✬ ✬ ✬ ✬ ✬ ✭ ✭ ✭ ✭ ✭ ✮ ✮ ✮ ✮ ✮ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✯ ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ✱ ❄ ❄ ❄ ✵ ✵ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✵ ✴ ❀ ✵ ✴ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ✠ ✠ ✠ ✠ ✠
☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✞ ✞ ✞ ✞ ✞ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ✆ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ✞ ✞ ✞ ✞ ✞ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✝ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ✍ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ☛ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
✣ ▲ ▲ ✥ ✫ ✬ ✭ ✮ ✯ ✰ ✱ ❆ ✳ ❀ ✝ ✆ ✌ ✄ ☛ ✞ ✡ ☛ ✡ ✂ ✎ ✍ ☛ ✌ ✡ ✌ ✆ ✏ ✎ ✠ ✠ ✎ ✕ ✆ ✶
✷ ☞ ,QWHQVLW\✍ ✑ ✎ ☛ ✓ ✝ ✎ ✡ ✞ ☛ ☛ ✡ ✘ ✑ 'XUDWLRQ)✝ ✞ ✎ ☎ ✷ ✍ ✌ ✖ ✍ ✌ ✠ ☛ ✝ ✞ ▼ ✏ ✌ ✪ ✠ ✠ ✘ UHTXHQF\❅ ✁ ✞ ✌ ✂ ✞ ☛ ✞ ✡ ✆ ✝ ✝ ✞ ✂ ✔ ✷ ✘ &✻ ✌ ✖ ☎ XUYHVIRU5DWLRQDO0HWKRG ✠ ✍
☛ ✌ ✂ ▼ ✝ ✎ ✪ ✞ ✘ ✘ ❇ ✦ ✗ ✍ ☛ ✧ ☎ ☛ ✞ ✟ ✔ ✂ ✌ ✖ ✠ ☛ ✆ ✏ ✎ ✍ ☎ ✆ ☛ ✕ ✝ ✂ ✑ ✂ ✑ ☛ ▼ ✌ ✂ ✝ ✎ ✞ ✌ ✠ ✽ ☛ ✂ ✑ ✎ ✡ ✎ ✏ ✍ ☎ ✞ ✎ ✏ ✏ ✌ ✞ ✌ ✠ ✔ ✆ ✝ ✆ ✌ ✍ ☛
7DEOH5$
&LW\RI)RUW&ROOLQV5DLQIDOO,QWHQVLW\±'XUDWLRQ±)UHTXHQF\7DEOHIRU8VH:LWKWKH5DWLRQDO0HWKRG
❢
❣ ❤ ✐ ❥ ❦ ❧ ⑤ ❷ ⑩ ⑧ ♠ ♥ ♦ ❦ ♠ ♣ q r s t ✐ ❤ ✉ ♠ ❥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ t ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ♠ ⑧ ❷ ⑤ ⑦ ⑨ ✈ ⑤ ⑩ ⑥ ❦ ❥ ✇ ♥ ❦ ♠ PLQXWHVWRPLQXWHV ① ② ❤ ♣ ③ ④ r s t ✐ ❤ ✉ ♠ ⑨ ⑨ ⑨ ❥ ⑨ t ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑧ ⑤ ❸ ⑦ ♠ ❹ ⑩
❷ ❹ ✈ ❦ ❥ ✇ ♥ ❦ ♠ ① ② ❤ ♣ ③ ④ ④ r s t ✐ ❤ ✉ ♠ ❶ ❶ ⑧ ⑧ ❥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ t ❶ ❸ ❸ ⑦ ⑧ ♠ ⑤ ❹ ⑧ ✈ ❦ ❥ ✇ ♥ ❦ ♠ ① ② ❤ ♣
❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❶ ❺ ❹ ⑥ ❸ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ❹ ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑥ ❹ ❺ ❶ ⑦ ❸ ❹ ❸ ⑤ ⑧ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ❸ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❶ ⑩ ❷ ❸ ⑦ ⑤ ❸ ⑧ ❸ ❶ ⑧ ⑩ ⑩ ⑩ ❷ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❺ ⑩ ⑨ ❹ ❶ ❸ ⑥ ⑥ ❷ ⑥
❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑨ ⑤ ❷ ⑩ ⑧ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❶ ⑧ ⑧ ⑩ ⑦ ⑩ ⑥ ⑩ ❹ ⑤ ❸ ❸ ❸ ⑥ ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑥ ❹ ❺ ❶ ⑦ ❶ ❶ ❶ ⑧ ❶ ❷ ❷ ⑤ ❷ ❷ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑩ ⑤ ❶ ⑦ ⑦ ❸ ❹ ❹ ⑥ ⑥
❹ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ❶ ❺ ❹ ⑥ ❹ ❹ ❹ ❹ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ❷ ❷ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ❹ ❷ ❸ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑥ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑧ ⑩ ❷ ❷ ⑥ ⑨ ⑩ ❹ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑤ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑩ ⑨ ❸ ⑦ ❷ ⑤ ❷ ⑥