Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAFFORDABLE SELF STORAGE - PDP - PDP170005 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSDecember 14, 2017 City of Fort Collins Planning Department, This letter is to address the planning department comments on Affordable Self Storage of Fort Collins. Below are the comments and our response in bold. Comments are also reflected on the drawings and have been updated accordingly. The design team has made changes to building footprints and site detention. We have been requested by the owner to peruse underground detention in-leu of an onsite detention pond. Also attached to this letter it the Modification of Standards Request to reduce the 30 foot landscape yard along the East property line that abuts Community Commercial zoned property. Thank You Curtis Koldeway Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview December 14, 2017 Curtis Koldeway Hauser Architects 3780 East 15th Street., Suite 201 Loveland, CO 80538 RE: Affordable Self Storage, PDP170005, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Morgan Uhlman, 970-416-4344, muhlman@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 04/04/2017 04/04/2017: Page 7 of the drainage report states that the 8" pipe to be installed from Lot 6 to Conifer St will be maintained by the owner of Lot 6. The owner of Lot 6 will need to approve this. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 04/04/2017 04/04/2017: Where is the 8" pipe shown that is being installed on Lot 6? Topic: Plat Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Property line is at the back of the right-of-way. 03/31/17 - I believe this comment was to mention that the sidewalk should be in the Public ROW, and not behind the property line. On sheet 2 of the site plans, the ROW line is shown behind the property line on the west side of the lot. Response: Sidewalk is within the Public ROW on the new site plan. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 04/04/2017 There is a label where the EAE goes north in the property is confusing, please make this more clear. Response: The label for the EAE has been defined Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Utility easement should be consistently 9' behind the right-of-way as shown on the plat. 03/31/17 - There is still a label that says there is an 8' utility and drainage easement on the South of the property. What does this go to? This label is found on the Site Plan and Landscape plan. Response: Easements have been updated to match the plat and have been updated for the underground detention system. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Add at least one more species of evergreen trees perhaps: Rocky Mountain Juniper (Juniperus scopulorum); Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa); Limber Pine (Pinus flexilis). Response: 5 Pinon Pines at the NE corner of the site are now Rocky Mt Juniper Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Environmental Planning comments provided here can be addressed and resolved during Final Plan stage (e.g. no further round of PDP review needed for Environmental Planning). Thank you. Response: Acknowledged. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Add to native seed mix: a. Scientific names (common names only are not reliable for ordering purposes). Response: Scientific names have been added to the Native Seed mix. b. Total pounds per acre and/or pounds per square foot to be applied including specification of which method is to be used (drill seed or broadcast). Response: Total pounds per acre and drill seeding has been added to the Native Seeding Notes. c. Application rate should be a minimum of 15 lbs/acre for drill seed method and minimum of 30 lbs/acre if broadcast method is to be used. Response: 15 lb per Acre now shown in notes. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Good start with Native Seed Mix notes on landscape plans. Adjustments needed. Add: Response: The notes below have been added to the Native Seeding Notes. a. NATIVE SEED SHALL BE ORDERED AND APPLIED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS ON APPROVED PLANS. IF CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE TO SEED MIX OR APPLICATION RATE BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS APPROVAL MUST BE PROVIDED BY CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER. b. TREAT NATIVE SEED MIX AREA PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SEED WITH APPROPRIATE HERBICIDE TO HELP CONTROL HERBACEOUS WEED SPECIES. ONLY AFTER APPROPRIATE TIME PERIOD THEN APPLY NATIVE SEED AS CALLED FOR ON APPROVED PLANS. c. PRIOR TO SEEDING SOIL WILL BE AERATED AND SOIL AMENDMENTS ADDED AS NECESSARY. APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEEDING EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED (STANDARD TURF OR AGRICULTURE SEEDING EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE USED). d. THE GROUND SHALL BE CULTIVATED LIGHTLY THEN SEEDED IN TWO DIRECTIONS TO DISTRIBUTE SEED EVENTLY OVER ENTIRE AREA. e. APPLY SEED TO NO MORE THAN 1/2 INCH DEPTH. f. AFTER SEEDING THE AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH CRIMPED STRAW OR OTHER APPROPRIATE METHODS AND PROVIDED TEMPORARY IRRIGATION UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. g. AREA WILL BE RE-SEEDED AS NECESSARY UNTIL ESTABLISHMENT SUCCESS CRITERIA HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED. h. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR SEEDED AREA FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, EROSION CONTROL, GERMINATION AND RESEEDING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH COVER. i. THE APPROVED SEED MIX AREA IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A NATURAL-LIKE LANDSCAPE AESTHETIC. IF AND WHEN MOWING OCCURS IN NATIVE GRASS SEED MIX AREAS DO NOT MOW LOWER THAN 6-8 INCHES IN HEIGHT TO AVOID INHIBITING NATIVE PLANT GROWTH. j. NATIVE SEED AREA WILL BE CONSIDERED ESTABLISHED WHEN SEVENTY-PERCENT TOTAL COVER IS REACHED WITH NO LARGER THAN 6-INCH SQUARE BARE SPOTS AND/OR UNTIL DEEMED ESTABLISHED BY CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Native seeded areas have incredible potential for water budget savings longterm, however, the installation and establishment in years 1-2 are critical to reaching longterm success. Prior to issuance of Development Construction Permit (DCP) the following will need to be approved: a. Native Seed Mix Area establishment and weed control management plan. Response: Establishment and Weed Control section has been added to the Native Seeding Notes. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Regarding site lighting and light fixtures, clarify exactly which color temperature (CCT) is to be ordered and installed for each proposed fixture identified on plans (AA, BB, CC). This needs to be explicit to avoid confusion in ordering and installation and significantly aids City Staff if there are issues or complaints post construction. Response: A new photometric plan has been made and fixture cut sheets have been added A reminder that 3000K CCT or less is requested especially for any and all LED lights. Several departments within the City of Fort Collins have been working together to address lighting pollution; they are referred to as the City Night Sky team. Results of the work can currently be viewed on the City Public Records website in Resolution 2016-074, a summary of City of Fort Collins City Council Intent and General Policy Regarding Night Sky Objectives. For further information regarding health effects please see: http://darksky.org/ama-report-affirms-human-health-impacts-from-leds/ Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, , mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/23/2017 02/23/2017: If there are any existing trees within the project boundary, please contact the City Forester to schedule an on-site visit to obtain tree inventory and mitigation information. Response: There are existing trees along Red Cedar Circle, at the NW corner of the site. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/23/2017 02/23/2017: Plant Selection Comments The narrow landscape area at the northeast corner of the site appears to be too narrow for the plants specified. Consider using ‘Woodward’ or ‘Taylor’ Juniper or ‘Standing Ovation’ Serviceberry. Response: These changes were made on the last plan revision. The Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry is not considered to be very drought tolerant. Forestry suggests using Russian Hawthorn or 'Rocky Mountain Glow' Bigtooth Maple in some of the locations where Autumn Serviceberry is shown. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/14/2017 04/14/2017: The first street tree east of the curb-cut entry on Conifer is within the site distance triangle. Please eliminate this tree for increased site distance visibility. Response: This tree has been removed from the landscape plan. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/14/2017 04/14/2017: Forestry is unsure what the symbol that crossed the parkway on Conifer. Please let us know. Response: That is a sidewalk crossing the parkway, requested in the last round of comments. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/14/2017 04/14/2017: Forestry asks that the street light along Red Cedar be shifted to the south away from the existing tree. Moving the street light would require changing the proposed street tree south of the light to an ornamental species, such as Chanticleer Pear or Red Barron Crabapple. Response: The light on Red Cedar has been removed from plan. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Response: Acknowledged Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting: Pre-Submittal meetings are required to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Affordable storage – project specific concerns: 1. Fire-sprinkler systems are required for buildings larger than 5000 sq.ft. 2. The north wall of building D located 5ft from north property line must be a 1-hour wall with 10% openings max. 3. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling. City of Fort Collins Building Services Plan Review 416-2341 Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Light and Power has electric facilities along the west side of Red Cedar Circle that can be utilized to provide power to the site. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investmen t-development-fees Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Transformer location will need to be coordinated with Light & Power. Transformers must be placed within 10 ft of a drivable surface for installation and maintenance purposes. The transformer must also have a front clearance of 10 ft and side/rear clearance of 3 ft minimum. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Streetlights will be placed along Red Cedar Cir and Conifer St adjacent to the property. Streetlight placement will need to be coordinated with Light & Power. Shaded trees are required to maintain 40 feet of separation clearances and ornamental trees are required to maintain 15 feet of separation clearances from street lights. A link to the City of Fort Collins street lighting requirements can be found below: http://www.larimer.org/engineering/GMARdStds/Ch15_04_01_2007.pdf Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Light & Power will need AutoCAD files of the approved site plan, utility plans, and landscape drawings before design and construction of the electric facilities will begin. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line diagram for the commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. A link to the C- form is below: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- forms-guidelines-regulations Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Response: The comments from light and power was addressed on the last submittal. Department: PFA Contact: Cal Sheesley, 970-416-2599, csheesley@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: AUTOTURN EXHIBIT The revised EAE is in line with the intent of the code, PFA would like to see the AutoTurn exhibit to verify the fire apparatus can navigate the EAE as intended. Response: B40 template is shown throughout the site, an AutoTurn was submitted to PFA for the main drive through the property. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: SIGNAGE PLAN > Sign locations are not well identified on the Site Plan. PFA recommends either (a) sign locations are indicated with a more distinctive symbol for easy reference and identification; or (b) sign locations are identified with labels and indicating arrows. Response: Signs added to plan “NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGN, RE: SITE DETAILS, TYPICAL 100' O.C.” > It appears that two signs need to be added to the north side of Bldg. C. One sign needs to be added to the east side of Bldg. C. Response: Two signs added to the north side and one added to the east side of Bldg. C “NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGN, RE: SITE DETAILS, TYPICAL 100' O.C.” > Fire lane signs should include double arrows at the bottom to indicate the full length of the fire lane. Double indicating arrows may replace the language, "By Order of the Fire Marshal" as currently shown on the details sheet. Response: Fire lane signs with double arrows added to site plan reading “NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGN, RE: SITE DETAILS, TYPICAL 100' O.C.” Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: PARAPET HEIGHT Actual parapet height is said to be 4' at high points and 2' at low points but the elevations (sheet A4) show a 6'6" height at the high point and no low point identified. PFA would like confirmation on the elevations sheet of an appropriate parapet height of 4' along high points and 2' along the low points. Response: Dimensions added to north elevation (Sheet A4) depicting parapet heights of 3’-6” at the high points and 2’-0” at the low points. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: PERIMETER ACCESS Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building as measured by an approved path around the perimeter. At this time, Bldg. D is approximately 110 feet out of compliance with the fire code. The applicant's intention to forgo perimeter access in lieu of adding 3-hour fire containment walls is currently under review by the fire marshal. Additional information to follow. Response: Noted Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: KEY BOXES REQUIRED > IFC 506.1 and Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Policy 88-20: Poudre Fire Authority requires at least one key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in an approved, exterior location (or locations) on every new or existing building equipped with a required fire sprinkler or fire alarm system. The box shall be positioned 3 to 7 feet above finished floor and within 10 feet of the front door, or closest door to the fire alarm panel. Exception can be made by the PFA if it is more logical to have the box located somewhere else on the structure. Knox Box size and location(s) to be determined by time of final CO. Response: Noted, Bldg A will have required knox box in approved location. With regards to manual gating, the swing gate between Bldgs. B & D indicates a Knox Box to be installed at this location. If this gate is equipped with a keyed padlock, the key may be housed in the Knox Box required on Bldg. A. A separate Knox Box is not required at the gate. A gate may be locked with a padlock when it can be cut with fire department forcible entry tools. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: PUBLIC-SAFETY RADIO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM TEST Building A will require radio testing. Code language provided below. > IFC 510: New buildings require a fire department, emergency communication system evaluation after the core/shell but prior to final build out. For the purposes of this section, fire walls shall not be used to define separate buildings. Where adequate radio coverage cannot be established within a building, public-safety radio amplification systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with criteria established by the Poudre Fire Authority. LOCAL EXCEPTION: PFA will waive the testing requirement and system installation in all buildings less than 10,000 sq. ft. and any Type V construction building less than 15,000 sq. ft. PFA policy P15-510.1 Response: Noted, Blda A will require radio testing as code dictates. Department: Planning Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 04/11/2017: Thank you for addressing the west elevation of Building F. Staff would still prefer two or three pilasters along this elevation instead of the CMU block taken higher up the building as shown. Pilasters will add three dimensionality to the elevation and break up the mass of the building better than what has been proposed. Response: Building F footprint has been updated and a screen wall has been added. please see sheets A2 & A3 for location and screen wall elevation. Also see attached exhibit. 02/21/2017: Building D does not have enough articulation along Red Cedar Cir. Please add pilasters along the west elevation and the cornice used on Building A to provide further articulation to the building. Response: This comment was addressed on the last submittal. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: How will the bases of the buildings be landscaped beyond the shrubs, trees, grasses, etc. shown? Will that area be mulched or rocked or will it just be dirt? Please provide more details about this on the landscape plan. Response: This comment was addressed on the last submittal. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: On-street parking may not be used to meet the minimum parking requirements. The parking ratio is also incorrect. The parking ratio for industrial uses is .5 spaces per employee minimum and .75 spaces maximum. How many employees will you anticipate for this storage facility? Based on this, please provide the required parking off-street. Response: This comment was addressed on the last submittal. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/22/2017 04/11/2017: I see that there is a proposed 8" pipe to allow for an outfall for attenuated runoff from Lot 6; however, it does not address the current conditions and where the eastern portion of Lot 6 drains. The referenced drainage report states that there will be additional drainage analysis required for the eastern portion of Lot 6. Where does this area drain to now? The current condition needs to be accounted for so there is still an outfall prior to any future development of Lot 6. The pipe can be used to provide conveyance; however, an adequate easement will need to be provided and it will also need to be shown that the proposed pipe is sized to convey the flows - that is, these off-site flows need to be quantified. 02/22/2017: Please provide additional information about the existing detention basin on site that is proposed to be removed. How will its removal affect drainage for this site/area? What area does it currently serve? Are there off-site flows entering the site that need to be routed? Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/22/2017 04/11/2017: Please see updated redlines (provided via pdf). 02/22/2017: Please see redlined drainage report and plans. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/06/2017 02/06/2017: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon redline comments), an Erosion Control Report (Based upon redline comments), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Recalculated based upon changes on the erosion control plan) . Also, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 04/17/2017: The sub-title will need to be revised. The sub-title on the Subdivision Plat is going to change. 02/27/2017: Please revise the title & sub-title to match the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 04/17/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 02/27/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 04/17/2017: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. 02/27/2017: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 04/17/2017: Some of the right of way descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Response: Descriptions have been corrected. 02/27/2017: Some of the right of way descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Response: Descriptions have been corrected. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 04/17/2017: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Response: Descriptions have been corrected. 02/27/2017: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Response: Descriptions have been corrected. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 04/17/2017 04/17/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Response: Changes had been made and the plat has been updated to account for the underground detention. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 04/17/2017: Some of the right of way descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Response: Noted, Plan is updated to match plat 02/27/2017: Some of the right of way descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 04/17/2017: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Response: Noted, Plan is updated to match plat 02/27/2017: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-416-4320, slorson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: TRANSFORT Transfort has planned service on Conifer. Please install a Type II bus stop pad in the parkway 100’ west of the access drive (see Figure 10 in Transfort Bus Stop Design Standards and Guidelines: http://www.ridetransfort.com/img/site_specific/uploads/Final_Design_Standard s.pdf). A fee-in-lieu can be paid for the amenities (bike rack, bench, and trash can) until service is started to the area. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/22/2017 04/11/2017: Please see updated redlines (pdf). 02/22/2017: Please see redlines. Department: Zoning Contact: Ryan Boehle, 970-416-2401, rboehle@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: The trash enclosure will need to provide a separate pedestrian access separate from the main access. Response: The trash enclosure has been removed