Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRAIL HEAD TRACTS F & G TOWNHOMES - PDP - PDP170035 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORTDRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL REPORT FOR TRAIL HEAD COTTAGE NEIGHBORHOOD Prepared For: Trail Head LLC 5013 Bluestem Court Fort Collins, CO 80525 September 12, 2017 Project No. 39145.51 Prepared By: JR Engineering, LLC 2900 South College Avenue, Suite 3D Fort Collins, CO 80525 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... i Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 General Description and Location .................................................................................................................. 2 Location And Existing Site Characteristics ................................................................................................. 2 Site Soils ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Floodplain ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins ....................................................................................................................... 3 Major Basin ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Historic Sub-Basins ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Developed Sub-Basins.................................................................................................................................... 4 Drainage Design Criteria .................................................................................................................................. 9 Regulations ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Low-Impact Development ............................................................................................................................ 9 Hydrologic Criteria ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Hydraulic Criteria........................................................................................................................................... 9 Drainage Facility Design ..................................................................................................................................10 General Concept ..........................................................................................................................................10 Water Quality/ Detention Facilities ..........................................................................................................10 Stormwater Pollution Prevention ..................................................................................................................11 Temporary Erosion Control ......................................................................................................................11 Permanent Erosion Control .......................................................................................................................11 Summary & Conclusions .................................................................................................................................12 References .........................................................................................................................................................13 APPENDIX Appendix A – Site & Soil Descriptions and Characteristics Appendix B – Hydrologic Calculations Appendix C – Hydraulic Calculations Appendix D – Existing & Proposed Drainage Plans Appendix E – LID Exhibit Page ii Engineer’s Certification Block I hereby certify that this Project Development Plan Drainage Report for Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) for JR Engineering, LLC and the owners thereof and meets or exceeds the criteria of the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Design Standards. ________________________________________ Timothy J. Halopoff, PE Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. 37953 Page 1 VICINITY MAP Page 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION LOCATION AND EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood is located in the Southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado within Tracts F & G of the Trail Head Subdivision. The site is bounded on the south by East Vine Drive and is surrounded on every other side by developed portions of the Trail Head Subdivision. A vicinity map is provided in Appendix A. More specifically, the Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood site is composed of approximately 5.19 and 5.54 acres of land within the existing Tracts F and G respectively. Both tracts of land are currently undeveloped, zoned LMN, and will support the proposed attached single family townhomes. Tract G generally slopes from the northeast to southwest with slopes ranging from 0.60% to 2.50%. The property is generally covered with sparse native grasses. Tract F generally slopes from the northwest to southeast with slopes ranging from 0.60% to 4.60%. The property is generally covered with sparse native grasses which have taken over the undeveloped site. When the Trail Head Subdivision was developed two large detention ponds with water quality measures were installed to handle the majority of the developments storm water runoff. Tract G utilizes an existing drainage system to convey storm water to the detention pond (Pond A) located on the southwest portion of the Trail Head Subdivision. Tract F utilizes an existing drainage system to convey storm water to the detention pond (Pond B) located on the southeast portion of the Trail Head Subdivision. Both of the existing storm sewer systems were designed to convey runoff from Tracts F & G in the ultimate developed condition. SITE SOILS The Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood soils primarily consist of loamy soil, predominately Fort Collins loam. Fort Collins clay loam belongs to hydrologic soils Group C. Group C soils have a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Runoff is moderately high, and the hazards of wind erosion are moderately low. Supporting figures can be found in the Appendix, page A-1. FLOODPLAIN The site is shown on FEMA FIRM panel 08069C0982F, dated December 19, 2006. The site lies within an area determined to be outside the 500yr floodplain. The “City of Fort Collins Floodplain Review Checklist for 50% Submittals” checklist is not applicable for this Drainage and Erosion Control Report. An annotated FIRM exhibit is included in Appendix A. Page 3 DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS MAJOR BASIN Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood lies within the Boxelder Creek/Cooper Slough Basin. The master study for this area is the “Drainage and Erosion Control report for the Trail Head Property” by JR Engineering, dated October 13, 2004, henceforth referred to as the master drainage plan in this report. HISTORIC SUB-BASINS Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood is an infill development piece of property. The ultimate design of Tracts F & G was accounted for in the master drainage report. The following basin descriptions reflect both the existing condition and ultimate condition laid out in the master drainage plan. Existing Onsite Sub-Basins: The site has eleven existing onsite drainage basins which were all analyzed in the master drainage plan. Sub-basin 221.1 totals about 4.6 acres located in the mid-east portion of the property, was designed to contain multi-family development. Runoff sheet flows south to a double type c area inlet at design point 21.1 and is piped to Pond B. Sub-basin 221.2 totals about 1.5 acres located in the mid-east portion of the property, was designed to contain multi-family development. The runoff from these basins is conveyed via overland flow and gutter flow north along Camp Fire Drive where a quadruple type 16 combination sump inlet will collect and convey runoff to Pond B. Sub-basins 221.4 totals about 0.25 acres and is located in the southeastern portion of the property. Runoff from this basin is collected in the gutters of Camp Fire Drive and conveyed south to the quadruple type 16 combination on-grade inlet (design point 21.4). These flows will then be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond B. Sub-basins 221.5 totals about 1.2 acres and is located south of the property in the ultimate condition. Runoff from this basin is collected in the gutters of East Vine Drive and conveyed east to a type 16 combination on-grade inlet (design points 21.5). These flows will then be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond B. Sub-basin 345 totals about 2.3 acres located in the Northwest portion of the property. Flows are conveyed via overland flow to Wagon Trail Road, and gutter flow to a quadruple type 16 combination on-grade inlet located on Wagon Trail Road at design point 45. Sub- basin 345 is planned for multi-family and a future park. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Page 4 Sub-basin 352.1 and 352.2 total about 6.6 acres and is located in the west-central portion of the property. Flows are conveyed via overland flow to two type C area inlets. These two sub-basins are planned for multi-family development. These flows will be conveyed storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basins 221.3 and 352.3 total about 0.8 acres and are located in the central portion of the property. Flows are conveyed via overland flow to Greenfields Drive where it then travels south via curb and gutter to two quadruple type 16 combination on-grade inlets located on Greenfields Drive at design points 21.3 and 52.3. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basin 352.4 totals about 0.5 acres and is located in the west portion of the property. Flows are conveyed via overland flow to Wagon Trail Road where it then travels south and north via curb and gutter to two triple type 16 combination on-grade inlets located on Green Lake Drive at design points 52.4A and 52.4B. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basin 359, totaling about 2.5 acres, is located in the southwestern portion of the site. The runoff from sub-basin 359 is conveyed via overland flow to East Vine Drive where it then flows west to design point 59 and is collected by a quadruple type 16 on-grade combination inlet. These flows will then be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. DEVELOPED SUB-BASINS The proposed developed condition sub-basins have been designed to mimic the historic basins’ runoff patterns. The following describes the proposed conditions on-site drainage basins. Refer to the “Proposed Drainage Plan” in the appendix for review. Proposed Onsite Sub-Basins: This site has 22 proposed onsite drainage sub-basins and 5 existing basins. Sub-basin A consists of 0.23 acres on the northern portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from this basin is minimal due to an impervious percentage of 18%. This basin will flow onto the property to the north where it will continue west along the north property line and ultimately to the quadruple type 16 combination on-grade inlet on Wagon Trail Road. Sub-basin B consists of 0.25 acres on the west portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. This basin consists of roofs and tree lawn running along the east side of Wagon Trail Road. Flows are conveyed via overland flow to Wagon Trail Road where it then travels south and north via curb and gutter to two triple type 16 combination on-grade Page 5 inlets located on Green Lake Drive at design point 3. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basin C consists of 0.79 acres on the north portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and driveways travels west along the private drive before entering a chase drain which conveys runoff on to Green Lake Drive where runoff is combined with sub-basin E runoff. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basin D consists of 0.29 acres on the east portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. This basin consists of roofs and tree lawn running along the west side of Greenfields Drive. Flows are conveyed via overland flow to Greenfields Drive where it then travels south via curb and gutter to a type 16 combination on-grade inlet located on Greenfields Drive at design point 7. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basin E consists of 1.29 acres running along Green Lake Drive west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and surface of Green Lake flows west along curb and gutter on either side of the street before being intercepted by two type 16 on grade inlets located at design point 2. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to design point 10.1 and continue to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basin F consists of 1.01 acres in the central portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and open area travels southwest along an LID bio-swale to design point 4. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to design point 10.1 and ultimately to Pond A for detention and additional water quality. Sub-basin G consists of 1.09 acres on the southern portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and driveways travels south and west along the private drive before entering a curb opening at design point 5 which conveys runoff to the LID basin within sub-basin H. Following LID treatment these flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and additional water quality. Sub-basin H consists of 0.26 acres in the southwest portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the surrounding sub-basins is combined with runoff from the landscaped areas within sub-basin H to be treated in the LID basin at design point 10. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to design point 10.1 and ultimately to Pond A for detention and additional water quality. Page 6 Sub-basin I is comprised of 0.12 acres along the southern portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed lawn area is conveyed along a swale to the proposed LID basin within sub-basin H. Sub-basin J is comprised of 0.20 acres along the southeast portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed lawn area is conveyed along a swale to the proposed LID basin within sub-basin H. Sub-basin K consists of 0.05 acres on the northwest portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from this basin is minimal due to an impervious percentage of 39%. Runoff from this sub-basin will drain on to Greenfields Drive and to the north. Sub-basin L is comprised of 1.30 acres on the north portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and driveways travels east and then south along the private drive before entering a chase drain which conveys runoff on to Green Lake Drive where runoff is combined with sub-basin Q runoff. These flows will be conveyed via Campfire Drive curb and gutter to design point 20 and continue to Pond B for detention and water quality. Sub-basin M consists of 0.26 acres on the northeast portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from this basin is minimal due to an impervious percentage of 40%. The runoff from these basins is conveyed via overland flow and gutter flow north along Camp Fire Drive where a quadruple type 16 combination sump inlet will collect and convey runoff to Pond B. Sub-basin N consists of 0.33 acres on the west portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. This basin consists of roofs and tree lawn running along the east side of Greenfields Drive. Flows are conveyed via overland flow to Greenfields Drive where it then travels south via curb and gutter to a type 16 combination on-grade inlet located on Greenfields Drive at design point 6. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond A for detention and water quality. Sub-basin O consists of 0.62 acres in the central portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and open area travels southeast along an LID bio-swale at design point 11 for treatment. 100 year storm runoff will overflow onto Green Lake Drive and combine with runoff from basin Q. Sub-basin P consists of 0.22 acres on the east portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. This basin consists of roofs and tree lawn running along the west side of Campfire Drive. These flows will be conveyed via Campfire Drive curb and gutter to design point 20 and continue to Pond B for detention and water quality. Page 7 Sub-basin Q consists of 0.91 acres running along Green Lake Drive east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and surface of Green Lake flows east along curb and gutter on either side of the street before being combined with runoff from sub-basin L at design point 19. These flows will be conveyed south via Campfire Drive curb and gutter to design point 20 and continue to Pond B for detention and water quality. Sub-basin R is comprised of 0.26 acres on the southwest portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and driveways travels south along the private drive before entering a curb opening at design point 13 which conveys runoff to the LID basin located within sub-basin U at design point 14. These flows will ultimately be conveyed to Pond B for detention and additional water quality. Sub-basin S consists of 0.48 acres in the central portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and open area travels southeast along an LID bio-swale at design point 12 for treatment. 100 year storm runoff will overflow into sub-basin V. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to Pond B for detention and additional water quality. Sub-basin T is comprised of 0.23 acres on the southeast portion of the subject property east of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the proposed homes and driveways travels south along the private drive before entering a curb opening at design point 15 which conveys runoff to the LID basin located within sub-basin V. These flows will ultimately be conveyed to Pond B for detention and additional water quality. Sub-basin U consists of 0.30 acres in the southwest portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the surrounding sub-basins is combined with runoff from the landscaped areas within sub-basin U to be treated in the LID basin at design point 14. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to design point 17.1 and ultimately to Pond B for detention and additional water quality. Sub-basin V consists of 0.23 acres in the southeast portion of the subject property west of Greenfields Drive. Runoff from the surrounding sub-basins is combined with runoff from the landscaped areas within sub-basin V to be treated in the LID basin at design point 16. These flows will be conveyed via storm pipe to design point 17.1 and ultimately to Pond B for detention and additional water quality. Sub-basin EX1 consists of 0.44 acres and is described in the existing basin section under sub-basin 352.3. Page 8 Sub-basin EX2 consists of 0.38 acres and is described in the existing basin section under sub-basin 221.3. Sub-basin EX3 consists of 0.19 acres and is described in the existing basin section under sub-basin 221.4. Sub-basin EX4 consists of 1.10 acres and is described in the existing basin section under sub-basin 221.5. Sub-basin EX5 consists of 0.43 acres and is described in the existing basin section under sub-basin 352.4. Page 9 DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA REGULATIONS This report was prepared to meet or exceed the City of Fort Collins stormwater criteria. The City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Manual (with all current 2016 Revisions)(FCSDDCCM) and the Urban Drainage Flood Control District’s (UDFCD) Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM) Volumes 1, 2 and 3 were referenced as guidelines for this design. LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT Volume reduction is an important part of the Four Step Process and is fundamental to effective stormwater management. Per City criteria, a minimum of 50 percent of new impervious surface area must be treated by a Low-Impact Development (LID) best management practice (BMP). The proposed LID BMPs will have the effect of slowing runoff through the site lot and increasing infiltration and rainfall interception by encouraging infiltration and careful selection of vegetative cover. The improvements will decrease the runoff coefficient from the site and are expected to have no adverse impact on the timing, quantity, or quality of stormwater runoff. Site-specific LID BMPs are discussed in the following sections of this report and an illustrative LID/Surface map is provided in Appendix E. HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA All hydrologic data was obtained from the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) or the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM). Onsite drainage improvements were designed using the 2-year storm event (minor) and the 100-year storm event (major). Runoff was calculated using the Rational Method, and rainfall intensities for the 2-year and 100-year storm return frequencies were obtained from Table RA-7 and RA-8 of the FCSCM. Runoff coefficients were determined based on data presented in Tables RO-11 from the FCSCM. Basin percent impervious values were calculated based on proposed future land use and from data on Table RO-3 from the USDCM. Time of concentrations were developed using equations from the FCSCM. All runoff calculations, and applicable charts and graphs are included in the Appendix B of this report. HYDRAULIC CRITERIA The rational method and the USDCM’s SF-2 and SF-3 forms were used to determine the runoff from the minor and major storms on this site. In order to size the infrastructure onsite, the runoff quantities and street grades flowmaster was used to size the storm sewer. Inlets were sized using the Urban Drainage UD-Inlet v4.05 spreadsheet. All storm sewers were sized to fully convey the 100-year storm event, while maintaining the 100-year HGL below the ground surface. All runoff calculations, and applicable charts and graphs are included in Appendix C of this report. Page 10 DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN GENERAL CONCEPT The proposed improvements to Tracts F & G of the Trail Head Subdivision will result in developed condition runoff being conveyed around the proposed buildings and to the south via swales. Low- impact development best management practices are proposed to improve the quality of runoff and aid in reducing peak flows. Specifically, LID Basins be used to treat roof and driveway drainage, and grass lined bio-swales (soft-swales) are proposed to improve water quality. About 52% of the proposed impervious area runoff from the site is captured in LID basins and swales located around site and in open areas adjacent to the homes. Runoff is conveyed via sheet flow, curb & gutter and bio-swales in a southerly direction to the proposed LID basins at the southern end of the site. The existing drainage outfall from the site is located in two separate locations on the property. There is an outfall located near the southwest portion of Tract G. There is another outfall located near the southeast portion of Tract F. The proposed drainage system is not intended to detain runoff but designed to implement LID infiltration areas while conveying runoff as designed in the master drainage report. WATER QUALITY/ DETENTION FACILITIES Water quality will be provided for the site through the use of LID basins and swales. Detention will be provided for the site through the existing detention ponds A & B located to the west and east. The existing detention ponds were previously designed to handle developed flows from the Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood site. Page 11 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL A temporary erosion control plan is to be implemented for the site during construction. Temporary erosion control measures include, but are not limited to, slope and swale protection, silt fence placed around downstream areas of disturbance, construction vehicle tracking pad at entrances, a designated concrete truck washout basin, designated vehicle fueling areas, inlet protection, and others. All temporary erosion control measures are to be removed after they are deemed unnecessary. PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL Permanent erosion control measures include, but are not limited to, the constructed detention/water quality ponds, riprap pads placed for culvert outlet protection, seeding and mulch placed to enable and established vegetative growth, etc. Long-term maintenance of these erosion control measures shall be the responsibility of the owner of the property. JR will provide a detailed Storm Water Management and Erosion Control Plan at the time of the FDP submittal that will meet all requirements of the City of Fort Collins. Page 12 SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS The existing conditions drainage has two onsite sub-basins with separate outfall points. The proposed drainage condition was designed to mimic the historic basins’ runoff patterns. The existing conditions drainage patterns are maintained in the design of the project. The proposed improvements will have positive impacts on the timing, flow rate, and quality of runoff leaving the site; and will reduce potential impacts for flooding downstream of this site. The hydrologic and retention/detention calculations were performed using the required methods as outlined in the City of Fort Collins Amendments to the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Criteria Manual. The proposed drainage improvements meet or exceed the City’s requirements. This PDP Drainage Report and the complimenting drainage plans and LID plans propose appropriate grading, permanent landscaping, LID BMPs, and onsite facilities (e.g. storm sewer, inlets, detention facilities) that are shown in their preliminary configuration and will be designed for construction in the Final Drainage Report along with supporting calculations. The proposed concept for the development of the Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood site involves routing developed condition flows to the existing offsite detention ponds. LID site enhancements will treat the site runoff at the source before allowing the runoff to be conveyed to the existing detention ponds. The site’s storm water facilities are designed to meet the City of Fort Collins “Storm Drainage Criteria Manual and Construction Standards” for both LID treatment and conveyance. Page 13 REFERENCES 1. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Volumes 1, 2, and 3), Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, June 2001. 2. Storm Drainage Criteria Manual and Construction Standards, City of Fort Collins Storm Water Utility, City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Updated January, 1997. 3. “Hydrologic Group Rating for Larimer County Area, Colorado”, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cooperative Soil Survey. Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. [July 21, 2010] 4. “Drainage and Erosion Control report for the Trail Head Property”, JR Engineering, October 13, 2004. APPENDIX A SITE & SOIL DESCRIPTIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 1 of 4 4493900 4493920 4493940 4493960 4493980 4494000 4494020 4494040 4494060 4493900 4493920 4493940 4493960 4493980 4494000 4494020 4494040 4494060 498610 498630 498650 498670 498690 498710 498730 498750 498770 498790 498810 498830 498850 498610 498630 498650 498670 498690 498710 498730 498750 498770 498790 498810 498830 498850 40° 35' 50'' N 105° 0' 59'' W 40° 35' 50'' N 105° 0' 48'' W 40° 35' 45'' N 105° 0' 59'' W 40° 35' 45'' N 105° 0' 48'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 15 30 60 90 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,190 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Larimer County Area, Colorado (CO644) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 35 Fort Collins loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes C 5.1 99.2% 73 Nunn clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes C 0.0 0.8% Totals for Area of Interest 5.2 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 3 of 4 Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 4 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 1 of 4 4493900 4493920 4493940 4493960 4493980 4494000 4494020 4494040 4494060 4494080 4494100 4493900 4493920 4493940 4493960 4493980 4494000 4494020 4494040 4494060 4494080 4494100 498850 498870 498890 498910 498930 498950 498970 498990 498850 498870 498890 498910 498930 498950 498970 498990 40° 35' 52'' N 105° 0' 49'' W 40° 35' 52'' N 105° 0' 42'' W 40° 35' 44'' N 105° 0' 49'' W 40° 35' 44'' N 105° 0' 42'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 15 30 60 90 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,070 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Larimer County Area, Colorado (CO644) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 35 Fort Collins loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes C 4.9 95.0% 73 Nunn clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes C 0.1 1.7% 95 Satanta loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes B 0.1 2.3% 103 Stoneham loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes B 0.1 1.1% Totals for Area of Interest 5.1 100.0% Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 3 of 4 Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 4 of 4 Larimer County Area, Colorado 35—Fort Collins loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2tlnc Elevation: 4,020 to 6,730 feet Mean annual precipitation: 14 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 48 degrees F Frost-free period: 143 to 154 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Fort collins and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Fort Collins Setting Landform: Interfluves Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Pleistocene or older alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock and/or eolian deposits Typical profile Ap - 0 to 4 inches: loam Bt1 - 4 to 9 inches: clay loam Bt2 - 9 to 16 inches: clay loam Bk1 - 16 to 29 inches: loam Bk2 - 29 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 12 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline (0.1 to 1.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 0.5 Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067BY002CO) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Minor Components Nunn Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067BY002CO) Hydric soil rating: No Vona Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Interfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, base slope Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) Hydric soil rating: No 103—Stoneham loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: jptw Elevation: 4,800 to 5,600 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 135 to 150 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Stoneham and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Stoneham Setting Landform: Benches, terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile H1 - 0 to 3 inches: loam H2 - 3 to 9 inches: clay loam, sandy clay loam, loam H2 - 3 to 9 inches: loam, clay loam, sandy clay loam H2 - 3 to 9 inches: Custom Soil Resource Report 14 H3 - 9 to 60 inches: H3 - 9 to 60 inches: H3 - 9 to 60 inches: Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 9 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 27.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 6e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Loamy Plains (R067XY002CO) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Kim Percent of map unit: 8 percent Hydric soil rating: No Larimer Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Fort collins Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 15 APPENDIX B HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS Subdivision: Trail Head 2nd Subdivision Project Name: Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood Location: Fort Collins Project No.: Calculated By: JMF Checked By: 0 Date: 9/12/17 A 0.23 0.95 0.00 0.01 0.95 0.04 0.18 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.35 0.43 B 0.25 0.95 0.03 0.11 0.95 0.12 0.46 0.20 0.10 0.08 0.65 0.81 C 0.79 0.95 0.34 0.41 0.95 0.31 0.38 0.20 0.14 0.03 0.82 1.02 D 0.29 0.95 0.04 0.12 0.95 0.12 0.41 0.20 0.13 0.09 0.62 0.77 E 1.29 0.95 0.66 0.49 0.95 0.29 0.21 0.20 0.34 0.05 0.75 0.94 F 1.01 0.95 0.11 0.10 0.95 0.32 0.30 0.20 0.58 0.11 0.52 0.65 G 1.09 0.95 0.42 0.37 0.95 0.49 0.42 0.20 0.18 0.03 0.83 1.03 H 0.26 0.95 0.00 0.01 0.95 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.24 0.18 0.27 0.34 I 0.12 0.95 0.00 0.03 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.12 0.19 0.22 0.28 J 0.20 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.02 0.10 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.28 0.35 K 0.05 0.95 0.00 0.08 0.95 0.02 0.33 0.20 0.03 0.12 0.52 0.65 L 1.30 0.95 0.43 0.31 0.95 0.44 0.33 0.20 0.42 0.07 0.71 0.88 M 0.26 0.95 0.02 0.08 0.95 0.09 0.33 0.20 0.15 0.11 0.53 0.66 N 0.33 0.95 0.04 0.12 0.95 0.15 0.42 0.20 0.14 0.09 0.63 0.78 O 0.62 0.95 0.09 0.14 0.95 0.19 0.29 0.20 0.34 0.11 0.53 0.67 P 0.22 0.95 0.02 0.11 0.95 0.12 0.53 0.20 0.07 0.07 0.70 0.88 Q 0.91 0.95 0.49 0.51 0.95 0.15 0.16 0.20 0.27 0.06 0.73 0.91 R 0.26 0.95 0.09 0.32 0.95 0.15 0.55 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.89 1.11 S 0.48 0.95 0.07 0.14 0.95 0.16 0.31 0.20 0.26 0.11 0.55 0.69 T 0.23 0.95 0.07 0.31 0.95 0.14 0.60 0.20 0.01 0.01 0.92 1.15 U 0.30 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.04 0.13 0.20 0.26 0.17 0.30 0.38 V 0.23 0.95 0.00 0.01 0.95 0.05 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.36 0.45 EX1 0.44 0.95 0.36 0.76 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.09 0.04 0.80 1.00 EX2 0.43 0.95 0.35 0.77 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.08 0.04 0.80 1.01 EX3 0.19 0.95 0.15 0.75 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.80 0.99 EX4 1.10 0.95 0.94 0.81 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.16 0.03 0.84 1.05 EX5 0.43 0.95 0.27 0.60 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.16 0.07 0.68 0.84 TOTAL TO PONDS 10.73 0.65 0.81 Basins Total Weighted Runoff Area (ac) Coefficient C100 39145.51 COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CALCULATIONS Weighted Runoff Coefficient Basins Total Weighted Runoff Basin ID Total Area (ac) Coefficient C2 Runoff Coefficient Area (ac) Lawns & Landscaping Runoff Coefficient Area (ac) Weighted Runoff Coefficient Asphalt/ Concrete Roofs Weighted Runoff Coefficient Runoff Coefficient X:\3910000.all\3914551\Excel\Drainage\3914551 Drainage_Calcs_v2.05.xlsm Page 1 of 1 9/11/2017 APPENDIX C HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS Subdivision: Trail Head 2nd Subdivision Project Name: Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood Location: Fort Collins Project No.: Calculated By: JMF Checked By: 0 Date: 9/12/17 FINAL BASIN D.A. Hydrologic % Imp. C2 C 100 L S o t i L t S o K VEL. t t COMP. t c TOTAL Urbanized t c t c ID (ac) Soils Group (%) (ft) (%) (min) (ft) (%) (ft/s) (min) (min) LENGTH (ft) (min) (min) A 0.23 C 18% 0.35 0.43 60 5.0% 6.2 550 1.0% 7.0 0.7 13.1 19.3 610.0 21.0 19.3 B 0.25 C 55% 0.65 0.81 52 5.0% 3.4 123 1.0% 20.0 2.0 1.0 4.5 175.0 10.5 5.0 C 0.79 C 79% 0.82 1.02 80 5.0% 2.7 550 0.8% 20.0 1.8 5.1 7.8 630.0 9.5 7.8 D 0.29 C 51% 0.62 0.77 53 5.0% 3.7 365 1.0% 20.0 2.0 3.0 6.8 418.0 12.8 6.8 E 1.29 C 71% 0.75 0.94 66 5.0% 3.0 560 1.1% 20.0 2.1 4.4 7.5 626.0 10.4 7.5 F 1.01 C 39% 0.52 0.65 100 5.0% 6.2 130 2.0% 7.0 1.0 2.2 8.4 230.0 12.8 8.4 G 1.09 C 79% 0.83 1.03 70 5.0% 2.4 550 1.2% 20.0 2.2 4.2 6.6 620.0 8.8 6.6 H 0.26 C 9% 0.27 0.34 100 10.0% 7.0 50 0.6% 7.0 0.5 1.5 8.5 150.0 17.5 8.5 I 0.12 C 3% 0.22 0.28 20 10.0% 3.3 210 0.6% 7.0 0.5 6.5 9.8 230.0 21.1 9.8 J 0.20 C 9% 0.28 0.35 75 10.0% 6.0 110 0.6% 7.0 0.5 3.4 9.4 185.0 18.2 9.4 K 0.05 C 39% 0.52 0.65 50 5.0% 4.4 20 0.8% 20.0 1.7 0.2 4.6 70.0 12.3 5.0 L 1.30 C 64% 0.71 0.88 100 5.0% 4.2 434 0.6% 20.0 1.5 4.9 9.1 534.0 12.0 9.1 M 0.26 C 40% 0.53 0.66 100 1.4% 9.2 20 0.6% 20.0 1.5 0.2 9.4 120.0 12.2 9.4 N 0.33 C 52% 0.63 0.78 50 5.0% 3.6 385 1.0% 20.0 2.0 3.2 6.8 435.0 12.7 6.8 O 0.62 C 41% 0.53 0.67 68 5.0% 5.0 103 0.6% 7.0 0.5 3.3 8.3 171.0 12.8 8.3 P 0.22 C 61% 0.70 0.88 60 2.0% 4.4 290 4.0% 20.0 4.0 1.2 5.7 350.0 9.7 5.7 Q 0.91 C 69% 0.73 0.91 55 5.0% 2.9 420 1.3% 20.0 2.3 3.1 6.0 475.0 9.8 6.0 R 0.26 C 86% 0.89 1.11 35 5.0% 1.3 125 2.0% 20.0 2.8 0.7 2.1 160.0 5.5 5.0 S 0.48 C 43% 0.55 0.69 75 5.0% 5.1 140 3.0% 7.0 1.2 1.9 7.0 215.0 12.1 7.0 T 0.23 C 89% 0.92 1.15 45 5.0% 1.3 100 2.0% 20.0 2.8 0.6 1.9 145.0 5.0 5.0 U 0.30 C 12% 0.30 0.38 80 20.0% 4.8 140 1.5% 7.0 0.9 2.7 7.5 220.0 17.4 7.5 V 0.23 C 20% 0.36 0.45 60 20.0% 3.8 60 1.0% 7.0 0.7 1.4 5.3 120.0 15.6 5.3 EX1 0.44 C 80% 0.80 1.00 15 5.0% 1.2 440 1.0% 20.0 2.0 3.7 4.9 455.0 8.3 5.0 EX2 0.43 C 81% 0.80 1.01 15 5.0% 1.2 440 1.0% 20.0 2.0 3.7 4.9 455.0 8.2 5.0 EX3 0.19 C 79% 0.80 0.99 15 5.0% 1.3 300 2.0% 20.0 2.8 1.8 3.0 315.0 7.2 5.0 EX4 1.10 C 85% 0.84 1.05 15 5.0% 1.1 740 1.5% 20.0 2.4 5.0 6.1 755.0 8.3 6.1 EX5 0.43 C 63% 0.68 0.84 15 5.0% 1.7 200 1.0% 20.0 2.0 1.7 3.4 215.0 9.7 5.0 NOTES: t c =t i +t t (Equation 6-2) STANDARD FORM SF-2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION SUB-BASIN tc CHECK 39145.51 DATA (URBANIZED BASINS) INITIAL/OVERLAND (Ti) TRAVEL TIME (Tt) X:\3910000.all\3914551\Excel\Drainage\3914551 Drainage_Calcs_v2.05.xlsm Page 1 of 2 9/11/2017 Subdivision: Trail Head 2nd Subdivision Project Name: Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood Location: Fort Collins Project No.: Calculated By: JMF Checked By: 0 Date: 9/12/17 FINAL BASIN D.A. Hydrologic % Imp. C2 C 100 L S o t i L t S o K VEL. t t COMP. t c TOTAL Urbanized t c t c ID (ac) Soils Group (%) (ft) (%) (min) (ft) (%) (ft/s) (min) (min) LENGTH (ft) (min) (min) STANDARD FORM SF-2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION SUB-BASIN tc CHECK 39145.51 DATA (URBANIZED BASINS) INITIAL/OVERLAND (Ti) TRAVEL TIME (Tt) t i = (0.395*(1.1 - C 5)*(L)^0.5)/((So )^0.33) (Equation 6-3) t i = overland (initial) flow time (minutes) K S = Average Slope along the overland flow path, ft/ft 2.5 t t =L/(60K*(S o)^0.5 (Equation 6-4) 5 t t = channelized flow time (minutes) 7 S = waterway slope, ft/ft 10 V t = travel time velocity (ft/sec) = K*S o^0.5 15 20 First Design Point Time of Concentration: t c =(18-15*i )+L t/(60*(24*i +12)*(So )^0.5) (Equation 6-5) i = imperviousness (expressed as a decimal) t c is lesser of Equation 6-2 and Equation 6-5. For Urbanized basins a minimum t c of 5.0 minutes is required. For non-urbanized basins a minimum t c of 10.0 minutes is required. Table 6-2. NRCS Conveyance Factors, K Nearly bare ground Grassed waterway Paved areas and shallow paved swales Type of Land Surface Heavy Meadow Tillage/field Short pasture and lawns X:\3910000.all\3914551\Excel\Drainage\3914551 Drainage_Calcs_v2.05.xlsm Page 2 of 2 9/11/2017 Project Name: Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood Subdivision: Trail Head 2nd Subdivision Project No.: Location: Fort Collins Calculated By: JMF Design Storm: Checked By: 0 Date: TRAVEL TIME STREET Design Point Basin ID Area (Ac) Runoff Coeff. tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) QCO, Street Flow (cfs) Slope (%) C*A (Ac) QCAP, Pipe Flow (cfs) Slope (%) Pipe Size (inches) C*A (Ac) Length (ft) Velocity (fps) tt (min) REMARKS 2-Year A 0.23 0.35 19 0.08 1.65 0.1 Runoff flows to north than west along north PL B 0.25 0.65 5 0.17 2.85 0.5 Runoff conveyed via Wagon Trail C&G to DP3 Chase Drain 1 C 0.79 0.82 8 0.64 2.40 1.5 Runoff conveyed along the private drive to DP1 Quadruple Type 16 Inlet D 0.29 0.62 7 0.18 2.52 0.5 Runoff conveyed south via Greenfields C&G to DP9 2 E 1.29 0.75 7 0.97 2.52 2.4 8 1.61 2.40 3.9 Runoff conveyed west via Green Lake C&G to DP2 Under Drain w/ overflow Area Inlet 4 F 1.01 0.52 8 0.52 2.40 1.2 Runoff conveyed via bio-swale to DP4 Curb Opening 5 G 1.09 0.83 7 0.90 2.52 2.3 Runoff conveyed along the private drive to DP5 Lid Basin w/ overflow Area inlet 10 H 0.26 0.27 9 0.07 2.30 0.2 10 1.06 2.21 2.3 Runoff flows to lid basin at DP8 10.1 10 3.38 2.21 7.5 Pipe conveyance following DP10.1 Chase Drain 9 I 0.12 0.22 10 0.03 2.21 0.1 10 0.09 2.21 0.2 Runoff flows west along swale to DP7 Chase Drain 8 J 0.20 0.28 9 0.06 2.30 0.1 Runoff flows west along swale to DP6 K 0.05 0.52 5 0.03 2.85 0.1 Runoff conveyed via Greenfields C&G to North Chase Drain 18 L 1.30 0.71 9 0.91 2.30 2.1 Runoff conveyed along the private drive to DP17 M 0.26 0.53 9 0.14 2.30 0.3 Runoff conveyed via Campfire C&G to North N 0.33 0.63 7 0.21 2.52 0.5 Runoff conveyed south via Greenfields C&G to DP10 bio-swale w/ overflow Area inlet 11 O 0.62 0.53 8 0.33 2.40 0.8 Runoff conveyed via bio-swale to DP11 P 0.22 0.70 6 0.15 2.67 0.4 Runoff conveyed south via Campfire C&G to DP19 19 Q 0.91 0.73 6 0.66 2.67 1.8 9 1.57 2.30 3.6 Runoff conveyed east via Green Lake C&G to DP18 13 R 0.26 0.89 5 0.23 2.85 0.7 Runoff conveyed south along the private drive to DP13 bio-swale w/ overflow weir Project Name: Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood Subdivision: Trail Head 2nd Subdivision Project No.: Location: Fort Collins Calculated By: JMF Design Storm: Checked By: 0 Date: TRAVEL TIME STREET Design Point Basin ID Area (Ac) Runoff Coeff. tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) QCO, Street Flow (cfs) Slope (%) C*A (Ac) QCAP, Pipe Flow (cfs) Slope (%) Pipe Size (inches) C*A (Ac) Length (ft) Velocity (fps) tt (min) REMARKS DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE STANDARD FORM SF-3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) 2-Year 39145.51 9/12/17 12 S 0.48 0.55 7 0.27 2.52 0.7 Runoff conveyed via bio-swale to DP12 15 T 0.23 0.92 5 0.21 2.85 0.6 Runoff conveyed south along the private drive to DP15 Lid Basin w/ overflow Area inlet 14 U 0.30 0.30 8 0.09 2.40 0.2 8 0.32 2.40 0.8 Runoff flows to lid basin at DP14 Lid Basin w/ overflow Area inlet 16 V 0.23 0.36 5 0.08 2.85 0.2 8 0.88 2.40 2.1 Runoff flows to lid basin at DP16 7 EX1 0.44 0.80 5 0.36 2.85 1.0 7 0.54 2.52 1.4 7.1 5 0.71 2.85 2.0 Pipe conveyance following DP7.1 6 EX2 0.43 0.80 5 0.35 2.85 1.0 7 0.56 2.52 1.4 20 EX3 0.19 0.80 5 0.15 2.85 0.4 9 1.87 2.30 4.3 20.1 9 3.67 2.30 8.4 Pipe conveyance following DP20.1 17 EX4 1.10 0.84 6 0.92 2.67 2.5 17.1 8 1.80 2.40 4.3 Pipe conveyance following DP17.1 3 EX5 0.43 0.68 5 0.29 2.85 0.8 5 0.46 2.85 1.3 Notes: Carryover (Street) and Captured (Pipe) C*A values are determined by QCO/i or Q CAP/I using the catchment's intensity value. X:\3910000.all\3914551\Excel\Drainage\3914551 Drainage_Calcs_v2.05.xlsm Page 2 of 2 9/11/2017 Project Name: Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood Subdivision: Trail Head 2nd Subdivision Project No.: Location: Fort Collins Calculated By: JMF Design Storm: Checked By: 0 Date: TRAVEL TIME STREET Design Point Basin ID Area (Ac) Runoff Coeff. tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) QCO, Street Flow (cfs) Slope (%) C*A (Ac) QCAP, Pipe Flow (cfs) Slope (%) Pipe Size (inches) C*A (Ac) Length (ft) Velocity (fps) tt (min) REMARKS 2-Year A 0.23 0.43 19 0.10 5.75 0.6 Runoff flows to north than west along north PL B 0.25 0.81 5 0.21 9.95 2.1 Runoff conveyed via Wagon Trail C&G to DP3 Chase Drain 1 C 0.79 1.02 8 0.80 8.38 6.7 Runoff conveyed along the private drive to DP1 Quadruple Type 16 Inlet D 0.29 0.77 7 0.22 8.80 1.9 Runoff conveyed south via Greenfields C&G to DP9 2 E 1.29 0.94 7 1.21 8.80 10.6 8 2.01 8.38 16.8 Runoff conveyed west via Green Lake C&G to DP2 Under Drain w/ overflow Area Inlet 4 F 1.01 0.65 8 0.65 8.38 5.4 Runoff conveyed via bio-swale to DP4 Curb Opening 5 G 1.09 1.03 7 1.13 8.80 9.9 Runoff conveyed along the private drive to DP5 Lid Basin w/ overflow Area inlet 10 H 0.26 0.34 9 0.09 8.03 0.7 10 1.32 7.72 10.2 Runoff flows to lid basin at DP8 10.1 10 4.21 7.72 32.5 Pipe conveyance following DP10.1 Chase Drain 9 I 0.12 0.28 10 0.03 7.72 0.2 10 0.10 7.72 0.8 Runoff flows west along swale to DP7 Chase Drain 8 J 0.20 0.35 9 0.07 8.03 0.6 Runoff flows west along swale to DP6 K 0.05 0.65 5 0.03 9.95 0.3 Runoff conveyed via Greenfields C&G to North Chase Drain 18 L 1.30 0.88 9 1.14 8.03 9.2 Runoff conveyed along the private drive to DP17 M 0.26 0.66 9 0.17 8.03 1.4 Runoff conveyed via Campfire C&G to North N 0.33 0.78 7 0.26 8.80 2.3 Runoff conveyed south via Greenfields C&G to DP10 bio-swale w/ overflow Area inlet 11 O 0.62 0.67 8 0.41 8.38 3.4 Runoff conveyed via bio-swale to DP11 P 0.22 0.88 6 0.19 9.31 1.8 Runoff conveyed south via Campfire C&G to DP19 19 Q 0.91 0.91 6 0.83 9.31 7.7 9 1.97 8.03 15.8 Runoff conveyed east via Green Lake C&G to DP18 13 R 0.26 1.11 5 0.29 9.95 2.9 Runoff conveyed south along the private drive to DP13 bio-swale w/ overflow weir Project Name: Trail Head Cottage Neighborhood Subdivision: Trail Head 2nd Subdivision Project No.: Location: Fort Collins Calculated By: JMF Design Storm: Checked By: 0 Date: TRAVEL TIME STREET Design Point Basin ID Area (Ac) Runoff Coeff. tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) tc (min) C*A (Ac) I (in/hr) Q (cfs) QCO, Street Flow (cfs) Slope (%) C*A (Ac) QCAP, Pipe Flow (cfs) Slope (%) Pipe Size (inches) C*A (Ac) Length (ft) Velocity (fps) tt (min) REMARKS DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE STANDARD FORM SF-3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) 39145.51 100-Year 9/12/17 12 S 0.48 0.69 7 0.33 8.80 2.9 Runoff conveyed via bio-swale to DP12 15 T 0.23 1.15 5 0.26 9.95 2.6 Runoff conveyed south along the private drive to DP15 Lid Basin w/ overflow Area inlet 14 U 0.30 0.38 8 0.11 8.38 0.9 8 0.40 8.38 3.4 Runoff flows to lid basin at DP14 Lid Basin w/ overflow Area inlet 16 V 0.23 0.45 5 0.11 9.95 1.1 8 1.10 8.38 9.2 Runoff flows to lid basin at DP16 7 EX1 0.44 1.00 5 0.45 9.95 4.5 7 0.67 8.80 5.9 7.1 5 0.88 9.95 8.8 Pipe conveyance following DP7.1 6 EX2 0.43 1.01 5 0.43 9.95 4.3 7 0.69 8.80 6.1 20 EX3 0.19 0.99 5 0.19 9.95 1.9 9 2.35 8.03 18.9 20.1 9 4.60 8.03 36.9 Pipe conveyance following DP20.1 17 EX4 1.10 1.05 6 1.15 9.31 10.7 17.1 8 2.25 8.38 18.9 Pipe conveyance following DP17.1 3 EX5 0.43 0.84 5 0.36 9.95 3.6 5 0.57 9.95 5.7 Notes: Carryover (Street) and Captured (Pipe) C*A values are determined by QCO/i or Q CAP/I using the catchment's intensity value. X:\3910000.all\3914551\Excel\Drainage\3914551 Drainage_Calcs_v2.05.xlsm Page 2 of 2 9/11/2017 APPENDIX D EXISTING & PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLANS Know what's Tributary Area Percent tc Q2 Q100 Sub-basin (acres) Impervious C2 C100 (min) (cfs) (cfs) 221.1 4.57 45% 0.55 0.69 11.4 5.0 23.1 221.2 1.52 49% 0.58 0.72 12.8 2.5 11.1 221.3 0.38 87% 0.86 1.00 5.0 0.9 3.8 221.4 0.25 61% 0.68 0.84 5.0 0.5 2.1 221.5 1.24 85% 0.83 1.00 6.5 2.5 11.2 345 2.26 10% 0.32 0.40 13.4 1.4 6.1 352.1 2.52 26% 0.43 0.53 11.7 2.2 9.8 352.2 4.07 43% 0.54 0.67 13.8 4.2 18.4 352.3 0.45 77% 0.79 0.79 5.0 1.0 4.5 352.4 0.54 61% 0.68 0.68 5.0 1.0 4.6 359 2.51 44% 0.56 0.70 15.5 2.6 11.2 BASIN SUMMARY TABLE Know what's Tributary Area Percent tc Q2 Q100 Sub-basin (acres) Impervious C2 C100 (min) (cfs) (cfs) A 0.23 18% 0.35 0.43 19.3 0.1 0.6 B 0.25 55% 0.65 0.81 5.0 0.5 2.1 C 0.79 79% 0.82 1.02 7.8 1.5 6.7 D 0.29 51% 0.62 0.77 6.8 0.5 1.9 E 1.29 71% 0.75 0.94 7.5 2.4 10.6 F 1.01 39% 0.52 0.65 8.4 1.2 5.4 G 1.09 79% 0.83 1.03 6.6 2.3 9.9 H 0.26 9% 0.27 0.34 8.5 0.2 0.7 I 0.12 3% 0.22 0.28 9.8 0.1 0.2 J 0.20 9% 0.28 0.35 9.4 0.1 0.6 EX1 0.44 80% 0.80 1.00 5.0 1.0 4.5 EX2 0.43 81% 0.80 1.01 5.0 1.0 4.3 EX5 0.43 63% 0.68 0.84 5.0 0.8 3.6 BASIN SUMMARY TABLE WAGON TRAIL RD. GREEN LAKE DR. GREENFIELDS DR. EAST VINE DR. Know what's Tributary Area Percent tc Q 2 Q100 Sub-basin (acres) Impervious C2 C 100 (min) (cfs) (cfs) K 0.05 39% 0.52 0.65 5.0 0.1 0.3 L 1.30 64% 0.71 0.88 9.1 2.1 9.2 M 0.26 40% 0.53 0.66 9.4 0.3 1.4 N 0.33 52% 0.63 0.78 6.8 0.5 2.3 O 0.62 41% 0.53 0.67 8.3 0.8 3.4 P 0.22 61% 0.70 0.88 5.7 0.4 1.8 Q 0.91 69% 0.73 0.91 6.0 1.8 7.7 R 0.26 86% 0.89 1.11 5.0 0.7 2.9 S 0.48 43% 0.55 0.69 7.0 0.7 2.9 T 0.23 89% 0.92 1.15 5.0 0.6 2.6 U 0.30 12% 0.30 0.38 7.5 0.2 0.9 V 0.23 20% 0.36 0.45 5.3 0.2 1.1 EX3 0.19 79% 0.80 0.99 5.0 0.4 1.9 EX4 1.10 85% 0.84 1.05 6.1 2.5 10.7 BASIN SUMMARY TABLE GREENFIELDS DR. GREEN LAKE DR. EAST VINE DR. CAMPFIRE DR. APPENDIX E LID EXHIBITS Know what's City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL CityDate Engineer WaterDate & Wastewater Utility StormwaterDate Utility ParksDate & Recreation TrafficDate Engineer Date EnvironmentalDate Planner Date Larimer County, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL LarimerDate County Engineer New Impervious Area 277,962 sq. ft. Required Minimum Impervious Area to be Treated (=50% of new impervious area) 138,981 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #1- Bio-Swale #1 18,682 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #2- LID Basin #1 134,742 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #3- Bio-Swale #2 11,976 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #4- Bio-Swale #3 9,779 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #5 - LID Basin #2 12,226 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #6 - LID Basin #3 11,723 sq. ft. Total Impervious Area Treated 199,128 sq. ft. Actual % of Impervious Area Treated 71.6% 50% On-Site Treatment by LID Requirement WAGON TRAIL RD. GREEN LAKE DR. GREENFIELDS DR. EAST VINE DR. Know what's City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL CityDate Engineer WaterDate & Wastewater Utility StormwaterDate Utility ParksDate & Recreation TrafficDate Engineer Date EnvironmentalDate Planner Date Larimer County, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL LarimerDate County Engineer New Impervious Area 277,962 sq. ft. Required Minimum Impervious Area to be Treated (=50% of new impervious area) 138,981 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #1- Bio-Swale #1 18,682 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #2- LID Basin #1 134,742 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #3- Bio-Swale #2 11,976 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #4- Bio-Swale #3 9,779 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #5 - LID Basin #2 12,226 sq. ft. Impervious Area Directly Treated by LID Treatment Method #6 - LID Basin #3 11,723 sq. ft. Total Impervious Area Treated 199,128 sq. ft. Actual % of Impervious Area Treated 71.6 % 50% On-Site Treatment by LID Requirement GREENFIELDS DR. GREEN LAKE DR. EAST VINE DR. CAMPFIRE DR. DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE STANDARD FORM SF-3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) 39145.51 100-Year 9/12/17 X:\3910000.all\3914551\Excel\Drainage\3914551 Drainage_Calcs_v2.05.xlsm Page 1 of 2 9/11/2017 DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE STANDARD FORM SF-3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) 2-Year 39145.51 9/12/17 X:\3910000.all\3914551\Excel\Drainage\3914551 Drainage_Calcs_v2.05.xlsm Page 1 of 2 9/11/2017 of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 23, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 20, 2015—Oct 15, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 2 of 4 of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 23, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 20, 2015—Oct 15, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/22/2017 Page 2 of 4