HomeMy WebLinkAboutSOUTH COLLEGE STORAGE - FDP - FDP170019 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
July 21, 2017
Katy Thompson
Ripley Design, Inc.
419 Canyon
Ave, Ste 200
Fort Collins,
CO 80521
RE: South College Storage, FDP170019, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions
about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your
questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or
pwray@fcgov.com.
Ripley Design, Northern Engineering, VFLA, Owner, Rossi Engineering
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501,
kandrews@fcgov.com Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment
Originated: 07/18/2017 07/18/2017: Variance responses will be sent as soon as
possible.
Response: Noted
Comment Number: 2 Comment
Originated: 07/18/2017 07/18/2017: Please update both street cross sections on
the cover sheet to reflect
new standard. Please add a note to the Skyway striping plan to indicate that
this is the interim striping and the standard will be implemented at such a time
as it becomes necessary.
Response: Both street cross section now reflect the new standards. And the
note has been added to the striping plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
07/18/2017
07/18/2017: The 130 foot vertical curve on C 4.01 and the 170 foot vertical
curve on C 4.02 do not meet LCUASS Figure 7-17 length requirements.
Response: Figure 7-17 is extremely difficult to interpolate because there are
no linear equations to use so it’s a best estimate at best by looking at the
figure. Why use Figure 7-17 when we are given Table 7-3? We designed all
our curves to either be 3 times the design speed length or using the k
values and whichever one was more conservative we used. Why keep
referencing Figure 7-17 when it is so arbitrary? How would you know how
long your curve needs to be if you are design speed is 35 mph and you have
an algebraic difference of 5.65? All I can really assume is the curve length
needs to be between 240 and 280 ft. Figure 7-17 hasn’t been updated since
8/07/2000 whereas Table 7-3 was updated on 10/01/2002. Regardless, we
have revised our curves and they are all above the required values given by
Table 7-3 as well as Figure 7-17. It would be wonderful to get clarification on
this issue so that I don’t have any issues moving forward with this project
and future projects. It could very well be possible that I am not even reading
the criteria correctly. Thank you!
-Blaine Mathisen (blaine@northernengineering.com)
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated:
07/18/2017
07/18/2017: The Mars Drive storm inlets are shown to be within vertical curves.
Per LCUASS 7.4.1.B.4.c. The grade into an inlet located in a sump shall have a
0.5% percent grade into and out of the inlet.
Response: Both west and east flowlines are .50% in and out of the sump.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated:
07/18/2017
07/18/2017: At ST 11+00 for Skyway Drive, the reconstructed cross slope is
less than the existing - this is not allowed per LCUASS 7.4.2.C.
Response: We will be milling and overlaying that area to smooth it out to be
a minimum of 1.5% across the entire cross section. Please refer to the detail
sheets for more information regarding this process.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated:
07/18/2017
07/18/2017: Please include cross section details showing cross slopes for
Mars Drive.
Response: The typical LCUASS standard cross section is shown on the
cover sheet. I added two additional pieces of information to the cross
section (slopes and curb type). All this information can be found on the
Mars Drive sheets.
07/18/2017: For the intersection detail on sheet C 4.01, please add spot elevations,
similar to the required centerline spot elevations, where the reconstructed portion of
the Skyway roadway will begin. Please also add a scale.
Response: Scale was added and two additional spot elevations were added.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: Please submit shallow bedrock mitigation plans in accordance with
LCUASS Chapter 5 requirements.
Response: Bedrock mitigation area has been outlined on the grading and
road sheets along with detailed notes on those sheets. Since we only had
one boring location actually within the ROW we assumed that bedrock was
1.5’ below existing across the entire ROW.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: Above-ground utility cabinets/transformers in parkways in the ROW are
prohibited by City Ordinance. In order for an underground utility cabinet or
transformer, which serves a single private development, to be located in the
parkway in the ROW, an easement would need to be granted to the developer by
the City Council. In order for this to be taken to Council, upper management in City
Engineering and City Utilities departments would need to agree that this is the most
appropriate solution. If you have further questions about this please contact Sheri
Langenberger, Development Review Manager, at 970-221-6573.
Response: No above ground cabinets/transformers are within the ROW
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: Engineering requests at least 1 more formal submittal for the project.
The submittal can be electronic rather than paper for Engineering's purposes.
Response: Okay.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: Language regarding natural resource protection will be included in the
Development Agreement for this project.
Response: Noted.
Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/07/2017
07/07/2017: Thank you for providing a prairie dog removal plan prepared by Jerry
Powell, M.S., Certified Wildlife Biologist / Ecologist, with Wildlife Specialties LLC.
Environmental Planning has reviewed the document in detail and performed a
review of similar plans in other jurisdictions. Please reference the three-page
comment letter that is specific to the proposed prairie dog removal plan and dated
July 12, 2017. Staff is requesting additional information, requests and clarification.
Staff will follow up directly with Wildlife Specialties LLC.
Response: Noted. A meeting took place on August 2nd to address specific
concerns in the comment letter.
07/07/2017: Thank you for adding the note (included below) requested on site and
landscape plans for both the ditch setback and associated natural habitat and features
and the wetland habitat and features. The approximate buffer hatching is sufficient for
the ditch. However, please also add and label the approximate boundary of the 1.5 to 2.0
acre wetland on the northeast portion of the area to be plated on both the site and
landscape plans. See redlines on page 2 of 8 of submitted Site Plan.
NOTE: "This plan shows the general location and approximate size of all natural
areas, habitats, and features within its boundaries pursuant to City of Fort Collins
Land Use Code Section 3.4.1(E). Detailed mapping of a site's natural areas,
habitats, and features will be provided at the time of individual PDP submittals for
these areas. General natural habitat buffer zones may be reduced or enlarged by
the decision maker during the PDP process."
Response: A hatched area of approximately 1.67 acres has been added to
the site and landscape plans.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/07/2017
07/07/2017: See redlines on 4 of 8 of Landscape Plan. Minor details but please:
1) add the word "Total" for the total pounds/acre seeding rate to be used if drill seed
method is used.
Response: Added.
2) reduce gap between text in "f" of Native Seed Notes.
Response: Corrected.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/21/2017
07/21/2017: The existing transformer shown on the existing conditions plan is
actually a 3-phase switching cabinet. The utility plan shows this cabinet being
relocated into the utility easement. Moving this cabinet will require re-pulling approx..
4 different runs of 3-phase cable. This will be quite extensive and require a lengthy
outage most likely outside of normal business hours.
Response: The existing 3-phase cabinet is getting relocated to the back of
curb which is less than 3’ from existing back of curb so the cables should
be able to reach the new cabinet location without having to lay all new lines
down.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/21/2017
07/21/2017: Any relocation or modification to existing electric facilities will be at the
expense of the owner/developer. If Light & Power’s existing electric facilities are to
remain within the limits of the project they must be located within a utility easement.
Response: Noted
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/21/2017
07/21/2017: The proposed transformer is shown on the utility plan as being fed from
the relocated switching cabinet. This cabinet is already full. A new vault will need to
be placed along the proposed Mars Dr. This new vault will serve as the feed for the
new transformer.
Response: A new vault has been placed at the corner of Mars and Skyway that
feeds the new transformer at the northeast corner of the building.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/21/2017
07/21/2017: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line
diagram will need to be submitted to Light & Power Engineering for all proposed
commercial buildings and multi-family (commercial) buildings larger than a duplex or
greater than 200amps. A link to the C-1 form is below:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-forms
-guidelines-regulations
Response: Noted.
07/21/2017: Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges, and any system
modification charges necessary will apply to this development. Please contact Light
& Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970-221-6700. Please reference
our Electric Service Standards, development charges and fee estimator at the
following link: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
Response: Noted.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Terry Ferrill, ,
Topic: General
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
The Fort Collins -Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation
District have reviewed the above mentioned project and submit the following
comments.
The District does not allow a long dead-end water line. The proposed water line is to
end at the service line or looped.
The water line has dead ended at the service line with an 8” Plug and T.B.
The District will require the proposed water line connection to be at the location of
the existing tee in Skyway drive. The existing tee is to be replaced with a cross.
The existing tee has been replaced and that is where the water line
connection has been placed.
The District signature block is to be replaced with the most current signature block.
An updated signature block is now being used. (Was taken directly off of
your website)
The District will require another review due t the nature of the above comments.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, ext. 104, if you have any
questions or require additional information.
Response: Noted
Department: PFA
Contact: Cal Sheesley, 970-416-2599, csheesley@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/17/2017
07/17/2017: FIRE LANE SIGNS
One sign along the west side of the development is not labeled "FIRE LANE SIGN"
and requires a label identifying it as a fire lane sign on the site plan.
Response: Label added.
Per sign detail, the appropriate directional arrows will be accepted by the fire
department, not "BY ORDER OF THE FIRE MARSHAL".
Response: “By order of the fire marshal” sign has been removed and the
universal fire lane sign is now the only one being mentioned.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: Need more information on building exterior finish schedule so that the
elevation call outs match finish schedule.
Response: Schedule has been revised.
Topic: General
07/21/2017: Based on the staff review discussion on July 19, another round of review is
needed. This next round can be an informal PDF review set for a standard 3 week
turnaround. In the event staff can determine the project is ready for mylars sooner, we
will inform the applicant at that time, but understand with the summer season, this is a
challenge.
Response: Noted.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: Clarify on site plan extent of new sidewalk along Skyway and location of
connection to existing walk. Label 5' walk on Mars Drive. Is our minimum walk
standard 6' wide?
Response: Sidewalk labels have been added. Minimum sidewalk width is 5’
per LCUASS standards.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/05/2017
07/05/2017: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon returned
redlines), an Erosion Control Report (Based upon comments on the returned CD),
and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Will need to be recalculated based upon
redlines on the plans). If you need clarification concerning the erosion control
section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or
email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Response: SWMP was updated per JS redlines. The Erosion control plan has
also been updated and the Erosion Escrow now reflects these changes.
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: Please identify the area on the grading plan where the soil media is to
be placed for the rain garden.
Response: Soil media is now called out on the grading plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: The two outfall locations on the parcel to the east need to be stable
through this area and to the culvert under College Avenue. This is required to
ensure stability for the long term.
Response: Stability will be provided by a turf reinforcement mat all the way
through the drainage conveyance path.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: The 6-inch underdrain for the rain garden can be revised to 4 inches.
Response: The 6-inch underdrain is now 4 inches.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: Please increase the outfall pipe from the rain garden to capture at least
the 10-year storm. The pipe is currently shown to be 6 inches.
Response: The outfall pipe has been upsized to a 15” in order to capture the
10-year event. A profile for this has been provided in both the Utility Plans and
the Drainage Report. Also a 30” Dome Grate will now be acting as our
monitoring well in order to capture all the flow associated with the 10-yr event.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/19/2017
07/19/2017: The riprap detail proposed may not be the best option in this
application. Limited vegetation growth is likely for these side slopes which may not
be desirable.
Response: We will be using VMAX SC250 reinforcement mat for the entire site.
This is a coconut turf reinforcement mat than can handle all our flows. This
was sized using the worst conditions possible (all inlets failing and it sheet
flowing across the steepest portion of Outlot B. A detail has been provided for
the installation procedure and the specific mat has been called out on our
plans.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/17/2017
07/17/2017: The Basis Of Bearings statement should match the Subdivision Plat.
Response: Basis of bearings has been updated
07/17/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles
on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Response: Titles now match sheet index
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/17/2017
07/17/2017: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets.
Response: Benchmark statements are all matching
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: All Basis Of Bearings statements must match on all sheets.
Response: B.O.B has been updated to be the same on all the sheets
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Response: These have been resolved
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Response: Fixed
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Response: Fixed
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas.
See redlines.
Response: Fixed
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/17/2017
07/17/2017: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Response: Items corrected.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/17/2017
07/17/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you
disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were
not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response
letter.
Response: Noted
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/17/2017
07/17/2017: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are
going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat.
Response: Easement description shown on redlines has been corrected.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/18/2017
07/18/2017: Striping final comments were submitted to Northern Engineering on
7/18.
Response: Noted