HomeMy WebLinkAbout1127 W. PROSPECT RD., WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY - PDP - PDP150033 - REPORTS -Supplementary Narrative – Project Name: CSU (1127 W. Prospect Rd.
Wireless Telecommunication Facility)
December 2, 2015
City of Fort Collins Planning Dept.
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: Supplementary Narrative – Proposed 65’ Monopine Communications Tower
To Whom It May Concern:
We are submitting an Application for a proposed telecommunications facility build near 1127 W.
Prospect Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80526. This facility will be 1,600 square feet and house a 65’
monopine tower that can accommodate up to three wireless carriers. This request is made in an
effort to bring quality voice and data services to an area lacking reliable coverage, as documented
in the attached RF propagation maps.
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The purpose of this request is to build a telecommunications tower housed within a 1,600 sq. ft.
wireless facility. This facility will provide critical wireless coverage to the surrounding area. This is an
area with a growing need for advanced quality voice and data services to a residential are where
coverage is reaching capacity limits, as well as enhancing the value of the surrounding property with
advanced wireless communication capability. This tower and facility will be used for structural
support of up to 3 wireless providers. Each provider will install antennas and on-the-ground base
station equipment.
Land Owner
Site Details
Pumbaa Properties, LLC
713 Sandpiper Pt.
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Site Address: 1127 W. Prospect Rd.,
Fort Collins, CO 80526
Approximate Coordinates:
Lat: 40° 33’ 58.754” N
Long: 105° 05’ 54.332” W
Lease Area: 1,600 sq. ft.
Tower Design: 3-Carrier
Applicant
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC Zoning: NC – Neighborhood
Commercial
4450 Arapahoe Avenue
Suite 100
Boulder, CO 80303
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC 2
SITE ANALYSIS
We strive to design our facilities and locate parcels that create the least amount of community
disturbance. We studied several prospective locations for this site. This location currently provides
visual screening with existing trees and vegetation, is located in a commercial area, and has ample
separation distance from any residential structures.
ZONING & COMMUNITY COMPLIANCE
Comprehensive Plan
This site is consistent with the intent of the long-range master plans for the local community. The site,
once developed, will provide critical local and regional network coverage and was designed to
minimize visual and noise impacts.
a. Increased coverage and network speeds. Residential customers will experience
faster connectivity, less dropped calls, and overall better voice and data service.
b. Increased capabilities of emergency service responders. Many emergency service
responders use devices that operate over cellular networks to communicate valuable
information during an emergency. A tower in this location guarantees more reliable
service for emergency services and physicians on their way to respond to an
emergency.
c. Greater carrier competition that will result in lower wireless costs for consumers. ATT,
T-Mobile, and Verizon are looking to capture a large portion of market share with
their LTE launches, so it is logical they will work to attract consumers with better rates
or offers than the current local providers.
d. Greater economic growth. Cities that encourage wireless technological advancement
and coverage growth will foster economic activity as increased wireless and data
connectivity promote ease and growth of commerce.
e. Advanced technology for smart phone and tablet users. Many companies are
developing smartphone and tablets that incorporate LTE technology. This tower will
house LTE equipment and further the capabilities of smartphone and tablet users by
optimizing increased functionality in LTE capable wireless devices (i.e. customers will
be able to browse the internet and talk on the phone at the same time).
Land Use
Our proposed use is in harmony with the current use of the parent parcel and is a permitted use in a
Neighborhood Commercial Zone.
Facility & Traffic
This site is unmanned and only occasionally visited by maintenance personnel. Therefore, it does not
require public facilities or services greater than presently available. Given the limited visits to the facility,
approximately 1-4 annually, there is no distinguishable impact on existing infrastructure or pedestrian or
vehicular traffic flow.
Federal Aviation Administration and Federal Communications Commission
We have applied for FAA approval and this site will maintain all applicable FAA 7460-1 Obstruction
Approvals and FCC required Antenna Structure Registration.
Noise, Safety, and Public Health
Our proposed uses will not cause any measurable increase in noise levels in the surrounding area,
any detriment to the health, safety, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
vicinity, and will not create any reasonable public health concerns.
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC 3
Fort Collins Land Use Code 3.8.13
(A) Location. Subject to the requirements of paragraph (B) of this Section, wireless
telecommunication equipment ay be attached to or mounted on any existing building or
structure (or substantially similar replacement structure) located in any zone district of the
city. Wireless telecommunication equipment shall not, however, be permitted to be
attached to or mounted on any residential building containing four (4) or fewer dwelling
units.
The proposed facility is a new communication tower and is proposed to be located
on a vacant lot in the Neighborhood Commercial Zone.
(B) Co-location. No wireless telecommunication facility or equipment owner or lessee or
employee thereof shall act to exclude or attempt to exclude any other wireless
telecommunication provider from using the same building, structure or location. Wireless
telecommunication facility or equipment owner or lessees or employees thereof, and
applicant for the approval of plans for the installation of such facilities or equipment, shall
cooperate in good faith to achieve co-location of wireless telecommunication facilities and
equipment. Any application for the approval of a plan for the installation of wireless
telecommunication facilities or equipment shall include documentation of the applicant’s
good faith efforts toward such cooperation.
Atlas Tower acknowledges and accepts this requirement. The proposed tower is
designed to accommodate up to three wireless carriers. Atlas is an independent
tower owner/operator and its business model depends on colocation. Atlas will use
best efforts to market the site to additional carriers and encourage colocation. See
attached signed statement of colocation.
(C) Standards.
(1) Setbacks. With respect to a wireless telecommunication facility that is a tower or a
monopole, the setback of the facility from the property lines shall be one (1) foot for
every foot of height. However, to the extent that it can be demonstrated that the
structure will collapse rather than topple, this requirement can be waived by the
Director. In addition, the setbacks for the ground-mounted wireless
telecommunication equipment shall be governed by the setback criteria established
in Articles 3 and/or 4.
The proposed tower is located approximately 35’ from the nearest parcel line.
However, the tower will be designed to collapse rather than topple. Prior to
submitting the building permit application, final tower drawings will be
produced showing the tower’s ability to collapse rather than topple. The
nearest ground-mounted equipment will be located approximately 15’ from the
Eastern Parcel line.
(2) Wireless Telecommunication Facilities. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless
telecommunication facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the
surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior
materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. Such facilities shall
also be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms,
topography and other natural features. If such facility is an accessory use to an
existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or
better than the materials of the principal use.
The tower is proposed as a stealth tree, or monopine, to fit the existing
environment that consists mainly of trees and other vegetation. We are
proposing a wooden fence, as depicted in page C-4 of the Zoning Drawings
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC 4
enclosed with this application. Atlas can paint or stain the fence whatever
color is recommended by Fort Collins planning staff.
(3) Wireless Telecommunication Equipment. Wireless telecommunication equipment
shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such
equipment is mounted.
Atlas acknowledges and accepts this requirement. The tower is a proposed
monopine, and the base of the tower will be painted a dark brown to give the
appearance of a tree. Any antennae or other equipment to be located on the
tower will be painted dark brown.
Whenever a wireless telecommunication antenna is attached to a building roof, the
height of the antenna shall not be more than fifteen (15) feet over the height of the
building. All wireless telecommunication equipment shall be located as far from the
edge of the roof as possible. Even if the building is constructed at or above the
building height limitations contained in Section 3.8.17, the additional fifteen (15) feet
is permissible.
This tower will be a new monopole, and will not be attached to an existing
building or roof.
Whenever wireless telecommunication equipment is mounted to the wall of a
building structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration as flush to the
wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is
mounted. Such equipment shall, to the maximum extent feasible, also feature the
smallest and most discreet components that the technology will allow so as to have
the least possible impact on the architectural character and overall aesthetics of the
building or structure.
Atlas will mount any antenna equipment as flush to the monopole as is
reasonably possible. Flush mounting systems will be required.
Roof and ground mounted wireless telecommunication equipment shall be screened
by parapet walls or screen walls in a manner compatible with the building’s design,
color and material.
Please see fencing detail on pg. C-4 of the enclosed drawings. All ground
equipment will be screened by a 6’ wooden fence.
(4) Landscaping. Wireless telecommunication facilities and ground-mounted wireless
telecommunications equipment may need to be landscaped with landscaping
materials that exceed the levels established in Section 3.2.1, due to unique nature of
such facilities. Landscaping may therefore be required to achieve a total screening
effect at the base of such facilities or equipment to screen the mechanical
characteristics. A heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening
may be required.
Atlas proposes extensive landscaping for this project, detail of which can be
found on pages C-3, L-1, and L-2 and will be a mixture of shrubs, trees, and
native grass.
If a wireless telecommunication facility or ground-mounted wireless
telecommunication equipment has frontage on a public street, street trees shall be
planted along the roadway in accordance with the policies of the City Forester.
It is not believed that this requirement applies to Atlas’ proposed location,
however, Atlas acknowledges and accepts this requirement.
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC 5
(5) Fencing. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities. Fencing
materials shall consist of wood masonry, stucco or other acceptable materials and
be opaque. Fencing shall not exceed six (6) feet in height.
Fencing detail can be seen on pg. C-4 of the enclosed Zoning Drawings. A 6’
wooden fence is proposed around the facility.
(6) Berming. Berms shall be considered as an acceptable screening device. Berms
shall feature slopes that allow mowing, irrigation and maintenance.
Not applicable.
(7) Irrigation. Landscaping and berming shall be equipped with automatic irrigation
systems meeting the water conservation standards of the city.
Atlas acknowledges and accepts this requirement, and will install automatic
irrigation at the site to meet water conservation standards of the city and
ensure viability of planned and existing vegetation.
(8) Color. All wireless telecommunication facilities and equipment shall be painted to
match as closely as possible the color and texture of the wall, building or
surrounding built environment. Muted colors, earth tones and subdued colors shall
be used.
The proposed tower will be a stealth tree. The base, or pole, of the tower will
be painted a dark brown to mimic tree material, and the branches will be a
natural green color.
(9) Lighting. The light source for security lighting shall be high-pressure sodium and
feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries so that there is no spillage of
illumination off-site. Light fixtures, whether freestanding or tower-mounted shall not
exceed twenty-two (22) feet in height.
Atlas is not currently proposing any lighting in the facility, but acknowledges
and accepts this requirement. Any lighting will follow the requirements of this
section.
(10) Interference. Wireless telecommunication facilities and equipment shall operate in
such a manner so as not to cause interference with other electronics such as radios,
televisions or computers.
Atlas Tower will not be installing any radio frequency emitting equipment on
the tower, but will ensure that any carrier installing on the tower will follow all
applicable local, State, and Federal interference regulations.
(11) Access roadways. Access roads must be capable of supporting all of the
emergency response equipment of the Poudre Fire Authority.
Current access roads are via paved parking lot capable of supporting
emergency response equipment.
(12) Foothills and Hogbacks. Wireless telecommunication facilities and equipment
located in or near the foothills bear a special responsibility for mitigating visual
disruption. If such a location is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized,
three-dimensional, visual simulation of the facility or equipment and other
appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the city’s
foothills and hogbacks.
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC 6
It is not believed this provision applies to this application, but photo
simulations have been provided with this application.
(13) Airports and Flight Paths. Wireless telecommunication facilities and equipment
located near airports and flight paths shall obtain the necessary approvals from the
Federal Aviation Administration.
Atlas has applied for and will obtain prior to building permit submittal all
applicable FAA 7460-1 Obstruction Approvals and FCC required Antenna
Structure Registration.
(14) Historic Sites and Structures. Wireless telecommunication facilities and equipment
shall not be located on any historic site or structure unless permission is first
obtained from the city’s Landmark Preservation Commission as required by Chapter
14 of the City Code.
It is not believed that the proposed location is located on any historic site or
structure. NEPA and Phase I environmental studies are currently being
performed at the site and will conform the lack of any historical significance at
the site location.
(15) Stealth Technology. To the extent reasonably feasible, the applicant shall employ
“stealth technology” so as to convert the wireless telecommunication facility into
wireless telecommunication equipment, as the best method by which to mitigate
and/or camouflage visual impacts. Stealth technology consists of, but is not limited
to, the use grain bins, silos or elevators, church steeples, water towers, clock
towers, bell towers, false penthouses or other similar “mimic” structures shall have a
contextual relationship with the adjacent area.
Atlas is proposing a monopine, or stealth tree at this location to blend in with
the existing environment of the parcel, which consists mainly of existing trees
and other vegetation.
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC 7
CONCLUSION
This narrative represents required and supplementary information to document the technological,
economic, and social necessity of a new 65’ monopine tower at 1127 W. Prospect Rd., Fort Collins, CO
80526. The information provided summarizes the inadequacy of existing infrastructure and highlights
the advantages associated with a telecommunications facility at our proposed location.
Atlas Tower Holdings respectfully requests the approval of our Wireless Telecommunication Facility
Application.
Kind Regards,
Ken Bradtke
Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC
4450 Arapahoe Ave., Suite 100
Boulder, CO 80303
Office (303) 448-8896
Co-location Documentation – Project Name: CSU (1127 W. Prospect Rd.
Wireless Telecommunication Facility)
December 2, 2015
City of Fort Collins Planning Dept.
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: Colocation Documentation– Proposed 65’ Monopine Communications Tower
Modern radio frequency equipment used to transmit and receive radio signals for
telecommunications equipment (cellular, PCS, LTE, etc.) operates using line-of-sight propagation.
The radio frequency waves transmitted from antennas and microwaves on tower structures can be
altered by the atmosphere, but more problematically by obstacles within the line of sight that result
in refraction or reflection of the radio waves and produce unreliable transmission of radio waves
between antennas and therefore disturbances and interruptions in wireless voice and data services.
RF engineers must take into account any tree or existing structures that disturb the line of
sight between transmit and receive antennas, the presence of variability in atmospheric conditions
and the curvature of the earth to calculate the diffraction, refraction, and reflection of radio waves to
correctly interpret the propagation between antennas within a network.
In developed areas such as this area, propagation is difficult because the area has mature
vegetation and dense commercial and residential infrastructure. Commercial buildings and
residential units near the proposed site present propagation obstacles, and some of the mature
trees extend 50’ or more above ground level. These obstacles result in diffraction of the radio
waves between antennas, so in order to accomplish reliable service in this complex, densely
populated environment, RF engineers have to design networks that use smaller coverage areas
with less distance between antennas as well as tower structures that can accommodate antennas
at heights that reduce likelihood of obstruction disturbance.
As is indicated in the map images below, there is only one tower within one mile of our
proposed location. There are six existing towers within 2 miles of our location.
The existing infrastructure in the area was unsuitable for the following reasons:
1. CCTM1 – 60’ Stealth Lightpole/Monopole. This is a stealth light pole structure with no
additional loading capability or available space to place equipment. This facility is also
too far away from the intended coverage area, and not of sufficient height given the
location.
2. Crown Castle – 90’ Stealth Flagpole/Monopole Tower. This is a stealth
flagpole/monopole with no additional loading capability or available space to place
equipment. This facility is also too far away from the intended coverage area to provide
coverage to the intended area.
3. Qwest Corporation – 150’ Lattice Tower. This is a lattice tower located over 1.55 miles
away from VZW’s coverage objective and is too far away to provide the intended
coverage. The tower is also fully loaded and could not support the additional required
equipment. Even if it could support additional colocation, any additional equipment
would have to be located below existing antennae, and would therefore be of
insufficient height given the towers proximity to the intended coverage area.
4. City of Fort Collins – There does not appear to be a tower in this location, though a
registration with the FCC has been granted. This location is also much too far away
from the intended coverage area, and is therefore not viable.
5. Jacor Broadcasting – This is a broadcast tower located nearly 2 miles away from the
intended coverage area. Broadcast towers and communications infrastructure have
interference issues, and therefore colocation is not an option on this facility. The tower
is also located much too far away from the intended coverage area.
6. T-Mobile – 80’ Monopoles. There are two appx. 80’ monopoles located at this location
owned by T-Mobile. Both appear to be at full loading capability and unable to support
additional infrastructure. Additionally, the available spots for colocation would be at
insufficient height to meet coverage objects. The site is also located nearly 2 miles
away from our intended coverage area, and too far to meet objectives.
We are constructing this site for Verizon Wireless, with the intent of multiple carriers
collocating on the facility. Whenever Verizon (or other carrier) is looking to improve their network
infrastructure, they always first look to existing structures and colocation opportunities. This is
because it is much faster and cheaper for them to go on existing infrastructure. When there are no
structures available of sufficient height or loading capability, new sites are needed. Verizon
approached Atlas to construct this site, after discovering no existing structures were available or in
the area capable of meeting their coverage needs. There is a nearly a complete lack of
infrastructure available within one mile of the facility, and essentially no existing communication
structures located over 2 miles from our proposed site as you move Southwest from the parent
parcel. Coverage in this area is severely lacking, and existing infrastructure is quickly reaching
capacity limits. This site will dramatically improve in-building and in-vehicle coverage to the
immediate area, and offload existing traffic in other parts of Fort Collins.