The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNCOMMON (310 S. COLLEGE) - PDP - PDP150013 - REPORTS - GEOTECHNICAL (SOILS) REPORTUsing CU-Structural Soil™ in the Urban Environment Urban Horticulture Institute Cornell University Department of Horticulture 134A Plant Science Building Ithaca, NY 14853 www.hort.cornell.edu/UHI Cover Photo: Elm trees planted in CU-Structural Soil™ in Union Square Park, NYC. Founded in 1980 with the explicit mission of improving the quality of urban life by enhancing the functions of plants within the urban ecosystem, the Urban Horticulture In- stitute program integrates plant stress physi- ology, horticultural science, plant ecology and soil science and applies them to three broad areas of inquiry. They are: • The selection, evaluation and propagation of superior plants with improved tolerance of biotic and abiotic stresses, and enhanced functional uses in the disturbed landscape. • Developing improved technologies for as- sessing and ameliorating site limitations to improve plant growth and development. • Developing improved transplant technolo- gies to insure the successful establishment of plants in the urban environment. Authors: Nina Bassuk, Urban Horticulture Institute, Department of Horticulture, Cornell University Jason Grabosky, Department of Ecology, Evolution, & Natural Resources, Rutgers University Peter Trowbridge, Department of Landscape Architecture, Cornell University Contact: nlb2@cornell.edu Layout & Graphics: Violet Jones & Wendy Wirth Photo Credits: N. Bassuk, B. Kalter, & P. Trowbridge Copyright © 2005 The Case for CU-Structural Soil™: Why do we need it, what is it, and how is it used? Urban trees experience a litany of environmental insults: soil and air pollution, heat loads, deicing salts, and im- pacts from utilities, vehicles, and buildings. The most signiﬁcant problem that urban trees face, however, is the lack of useable soil volume for root growth, since trees are often an afterthought in city planning and streescape design. (Fig. 1.1) What happens when roots encounter dense, compacted soil? When roots encounter dense soil, they change direction, stop growing, (Fig 1.5) or adapt by remaining abnor- mally close to the surface (Fig. 1.4) This superﬁcial rooting makes urban trees more vulnerable to drought and can cause pavement heaving. However, if a dense soil is waterlogged, tree roots can also rot from lack of oxy- gen. Soil Compaction Ongoing construction, including sidewalk and road repair, disturbs and compacts soil (Fig. 1.2), crushing macropores (Fig. 1.3). Loss of macropores has three negative consequences: restricted aeration, diminished water drainage, and creating a dense soil that is difﬁcult for roots to penetrate. These effects limit useable rooting space. Fig. 1.1 Tree root ball prior to being planted in a 4’ x 5’ tree pit in NYC. Fig. 1.2 Compaction is necessary to create a load-bearing surface on which to lay pavement. Fig. 1.3 Macropores are spaces between soil aggregates that allow water, air and subsequently root growth. Fig. 1.4 Surface rooting of trees growing in compacted soils Macropores • the relatively large spaces between soil aggregates • water drains quickly through macropores • air diffuses through macropores Macropores are the spaces between the soil aggregates 1 The role of soil volume on tree growth The soil in urban tree lawns or parks can be improved by amendment or soil replacement. Where soil volume is limited by pavement, tree roots suffer (Fig 1.6). The highly compacted soils required for constructing pave- ments do not allow root penetration, resulting in declining trees which are all too common in cities. Yet it is precisely these paved areas such as parking lots and streets that most need the mitigating effects of shade trees. Healthy trees need a large volume of non-compacted soil with adequate drainage and aeration and reasonable fertility. CU-Structural Soil™ meets these needs while also fulﬁlling engineers’ load-bearing requirements for base courses under pavement. 2 Fig. 1.5 Tree roots which are typically superﬁcial can become ‘containerized’ by compacted soil under and around trees. Fig.1.6 This photograph shows the effect of soil volume on tree growth. Both rows of willow oaks were planted at the same time on Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C. The trees on the right are in tree pits, and those on the left are in an open grassed area. Loading or Compaction Effort Fig.1.7 Conceptual diagram of CU-Structural Soil™ including stone-on-stone compaction and soil in interstitial spaces used as a base course for pavements. Stone Soil particle Air or water pores Stone contact points where load is transferred Legend CU-Structural Soil™ Basics CU-Structural Soil™ (U.S. Patent # 5,849,069) is a two-part system comprised of a rigid stone “lattice” to meet engineering requirements for a load-bearing soil, and a quantity of soil, to meet tree requirements for root growth. The lattice of load-bearing stones provides stability as well as interconnected voids for root penetra- tion, air and water movement (Fig. 1.7). The uniformly graded 3/4”-1 1/2” angular crushed stone speciﬁed for CU-Structural Soil™ is designed to ensure the greatest porosity. Crushed or angular stone provides more com- paction and structural interface of stone-to-stone than round stone. Because stone is the load-bearing component of structural soil, the aggregates used should meet regional or state department of transportation standards for pavement base courses. Since among soil textures, clay has the most water and nutrient-holding capacity, a heavy clay loam or loam, with a minimum of 20% clay, is selected for the CU-Structural Soil™ system. CU-Structural Soil™ should also have organic matter content ranging from 2%-5% to ensure nutrient and water holding while encouraging ben- eﬁcial microbial activity. A minimum of 20% clay is also essential for an adequate cation exchange capacity. With carefully chosen uniformly-graded stone and the proper stone to soil ratio, a medium for healthy root growth is created that also can be compacted to meet engineers’ load-bearing speciﬁcations (Fig. 1.8). The in- tention is to “suspend” the clay soil between the stones without over-ﬁlling the voids, which would compromise aeration and bearing capacity. CU-Structural Soil™ utilizes Gelscape® hydrogel as a non-toxic, non-phytotoxic tackiﬁer, in addition to stone and soil components. 3 Fig. 1.8 From upper left, clockwise: uniformly-graded crushed stone of 3/4” - 1 1/2” diameter, pile and close-up; CU-Structural Soil™ after mixing; clay loam. Using CU-Structural Soil™ for Street Trees CU-Structural Soil™ is intended for paved sites to provide adequate soil volumes for tree roots under pave- ments (Fig. 1.9). It can and should be used under pedestrian mall paving, sidewalks, parking lots, and low-use access roads. The Urban Horticulture Institute is currently conducting trials of its use under turf and porous asphalt to provide more porous parking areas. Research at Cornell has shown that tree roots in CU-Structural Soil™ proﬁles grow deep into the base course material, away from the ﬂuctuating temperatures at the pavement surface. One beneﬁt of this is that roots are less likely to heave and crack pavement than with conventional pav- ing systems (Fig. 1.10). Planting a tree into CU-Structural Soil™ is much like conventional planting. If possible, the pavement opening should be expandable (via removable pavers or using a mulched area) for the sake of the anticipated buttress roots of maturing trees (Fig. 1.11). CU-Structural Soil™ should be used at a depth of at least 24” but preferably 36” (Fig.1.12). CU-Structural Soil™ can be used right up to the surface grade where there is a pavement open- ing that is large enough to allow for tree installation. 4 Fig.1.9 Installing CU-Structural Soil™ in Ithaca, NY in 1997 Fig. 1.10 Sidewalk heaving caused by superﬁ- cial tree root growth, Ithaca, NY Fig. 1.11 Lindens in CU-Structural Soil™ in Boston, 2002 Fig. 1.12 Typical street tree planting using CU-Structural Soil™ under a sidewalk CU-Structural Soil™ Building Face 3” Thick Bark Mulch Poured-In-Place Concrete Curb Asphalt Pavement Base Course Prepared Subgrade Drainage Pipe Tied to Storm Sewer Varies Pref. 36” 5 Fig. 1.12a Example of street tree planting using CU-Struc- tural Soil™ under conventional concrete sidewalk in Brook- lyn, NY Trees in parking lots, as well as paved plazas, beneﬁt from the use of CU-Structural Soil™ (Fig.1.16 - 1.17). Whether there is a curb or not, good, well-drained topsoil may be used around the tree where the open- ing is at least 5’ x 5’. If the opening is smaller, CU-Structural Soil™ may be used right up to the tree ball. Although it is not necessary to use an additional base course on top of CU-Structural Soil™, some engi- neers may want to do this, immediately under the pavement. Given the large volume of CU-Structural Soil™ for tree roots to explore, irrigation may not be necessary after tree establishment—the decision depends on the region of the country and on site management. While there is less moisture in CU-Structural Soil™ on a per-volume basis than in conventional soil, the root system in structural soil has more room for expansion, allowing for increased water absorption. Supplemental water should be provided during the ﬁrst growing season as would be expected for any newly planted tree. In regions where irrigation is necessary to grow trees, low-volume, under-pavement irrigation systems have been used successfully. Fertilizer can be dissolved into the irrigation water if necessary, although to date, nutrient deﬁciencies have not been noted, probably due to the large volume of rooting media. Trees in Parking Lots and Plazas: CU-Structural Soil™ may also be used to enlarge a ‘tree island’ within a parking lot. With a large tree planting area, good, well draining topsoil can be used in the island and CU-Structural Soil™ added as an unseen rooting medium under the asphalt (Figs. 1.13 - 1.15). Fig. 1.13 Plan view of planting island 6 Extent of CU-Structural Soil™ Planting island curb Varies Fig. 1.15 In this parking lot, there is only a 2 foot opening for tree planting. Here CU-Structural Soil™ was installed parallel to railroad tracks, 12’ wide and 36” deep. With such a narrow opening, there is no reason to use a planting mix other than CU-Structural Soil™ around the tree ball. Fig. 1.14 Potential use of CU-Structural Soil™ to enlarge planting islands in park- ing lots without taking up parking space Fig. 1.16 Bare root tree in typical parking lot island or plaza 3” Thick Bark Mulch Planting Soil Mix as Speciﬁed Curb Base Course Prepared Subgrade CU-Structural Soil™ Drainage Pipe Connects to Storm System 8’ TYP. 8’ TYP. Porous Asphalt Pavement Desirable Pref. 36” Varies 8” 7 Fig. 1.17 English oaks planted in a plaza at Battery Park City, NYC Positive drainage below the root system is necessary in this system, since the sub-grade below the CU-Structural Soil™ may be compacted and impermeable. A perforated and wrapped drain, connected to storm drainage, should be placed between the CU- Structural Soil™ and the compacted sub- grade (Fig.1.18). Where the curb footer goes to greater depth for a planter, a 6”- 8” PVC sleeve ﬁlled with uncompacted soil should be used to give tree roots access to the CU-Structural Soil™ beyond the planter wall (Figs 1.18-1.19). Fig. 1.18 Limited soil volume planter with root access into CU-Structural Soil™ under plaza pavement Perforated Drainage Pipe Prepared Subgrade CU-Structural Soil™ Width Varies – Preferably 36” 6” - 8” PVC Sleeve, Root Access Area Pavement Finish Grade Concrete Planter Planting Soil Mix as Speciﬁed 3” Thick Bark Mulch Fig. 1.19 Plan view of limited soil volume planter Varies 6” - 8” PVC Sleeve Roots Moving Through PVC Openings into CU-Structural Soil™ Concrete Planter Extent of CU-Structural Soil™ Varies 8 Creating break-out zones for trees in narrow tree lawns Where there is an adjacent green space, whether a park or front lawn, CU-Structural Soil™ may be used as a channel for roots to safely grow under pavement into this green space (Figs. 1.20 - 1.23). Generally two 5’ con- crete ﬂags are removed, then the area is excavated to 24”- 36” and CU-Structural Soil™ is backﬁlled into them. Paving slabs are then replaced in a conventional manner. Curb Edge Narrow Tree Lawn Existing Sidewalk Adjacent Landscape Area Break-Out Zone: Existing Pavement Section Replaced, CU-Structural Soil™ Below Fig. 1.21 Plan view of retroﬁtted CU-Structural Soil™ break-out zone Fig. 1.20 Break-out zone with CU-Structural Soil™ under a sidewalk between a narrow tree lawn and adjacent landscape area 9 Fig. 1.23 CU-Structural Soil™ break-out zone from narrow tree lawn to adjacent landscape area Fig. 1.22 Trees planted in Brooklyn, NY in 1997 where CU-Structural Soil™ was installed in a continuous trench 7’ wide adja- cent to the park fence. Street 3” Thick Bark Mulch Existing Tree Lawn Soil Concrete Pavement Sidewalk Front Yard Drainage Pipe Connects to Storm System 10 CU-Structural Soil™ CU-Structural Soil ™ use with permeable pavers If non-mortared pavers are used, a setting bed of uniformly-graded coarse sand should be used, to a depth speci- ﬁed by paver manufacturer speciﬁcations. To discourage rooting in this layer, a geo-textile—one that does not restrict water movement—can be used between this material and the CU-Structural Soil™ (Figs. 1.24 - 1.25). 18” Fig. 1.25 Street tree detail with permeable pavers Building Face Pavers to be Removed as Tree Grows Permeable Concrete or Pavers Curb 4” Asphalt Pavement Granular Base Geotextile Fabric Drainage Pipe Connects to Stormwater Sewer System Prepared Subgrade Setting Bed with Filter Fabric 3” Thick Bark Mulch 36” Pref. Min. CU- Structural Soil™ Fig. 1.24 Concrete unit pavers on a coarse sand setting bed on top of a con- tinuous trench of CU-Structural Soil™ in Ithaca, NY 11 12 (names in parentheses are older botanic names) Some Street Trees Appropriate for use in CU-Structural Soil™ (Guiding selection criteria: moderate to highly drought tolerant and alkaline soil tolerant trees) Botanic Name Common Name Acer campestre Hedge Maple Acer miyabei Miyabei Maple Acer nigrum Black Maple Acer platanoides Norway Maple Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore Maple Acer truncatum Painted Maple Carpinus betulus European Hornbeam Catalpa speciosa Northern Catalpa Celtis occidentalis Hackberry Cercis canadensis Redbud Cornus mas Cornelian Cherry Cornus foemina (Cornus racemosa) Gray Dogwood Corylus colurna Turkish Hazelnut Crataegus crus-galli Cockspur Hawthorn Crataegus phaenopyrum Washington Hawthorn Crataegus punctata Thicket Hawthorn Crateagus viridis Green Hawthorn Eucommia ulmoides Hardy Rubber Tree Fraxinus americana White Ash Fraxinus excelsior European Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Ginkgo biloba Ginkgo Gleditsia triacanthos Honey Locust Gymnocladus dioicus Kentucky Coffee Tree Koelreuteria paniculata Goldenrain Tree Maclura pomifera Osage Orange Malus spp. Crabapple Parrotia persica Ironwood Phellodendron amurense Amur Cork Tree Platanus x acerifolia London Plane Populus alba White Poplar Populus deltoides Northern Cottonwood Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Pyrus calleryana Callery Pear Pyrus ussuriensis Ussurian Pear Quercus macrocarpa Mossy-Cup Oak Quercus muehlenbergii Chinkapin Oak Quercus robur English Oak Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust Styphnolobium japonicum (Sophora japonica) Japanese Pagoda Tree Sorbus alnifolia Korean Mountain Ash Sorbus thuringiaca Oak-Leafed Mountain Ash Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac Tilia americana Basswood Tilia cordata Littleleaf Linden Tilia tomentosa Silver Linden Tilia x euchlora Crimean Linden Ulmus americana American Elm Ulmus carpinifolia Smooth-Leaf Elm Ulmus parvifolia Lace Bark Elm Ulmus spp. Elm Hybrids Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova Frequently Asked Questions What volume of CU-Structural Soil™ is needed for a given tree? The Urban Horticulture Institute at Cornell has found that, with the exception of the desert southwest, two cubic feet of soil is needed for every square foot of crown projection (the anticipated area under the drip line of the tree at expected maturity). Trees growing in CU-Struc- tural Soil™ in areas that normally use irrigation to grow trees should also provide low volume drip irrigation in CU-Structural Soil™ installations. What is the recommended depth for CU-Structural Soil™? We suggest a minimum of 24” but 36” is preferred. A base course of gravel is not needed on top of CU-Struc- tural Soil™ because it was designed to be as strong as a base course. Properly compacted to 95-100% Proctor Density or Modiﬁed Proctor Density, it has a CBR of 50 or greater. What is the recommended length and width for CU-Structural Soil™ installation? There is no established minimum. However, CU-Structural Soil™ was designed to go under the entire pave- ment area. This homogeneity would ensure uniform engineering characteristics below the pavement, particu- larly in regard to frost heaving and drainage. Ideally, the installation should focus on a whole sidewalk section from building face to curb, potentially for a whole block. If it is impossible to use the entire sidewalk area, using CU-Structural Soil™, it can be placed in a 5’- 8’ wide trench parallel to the curb. Won’t the soil migrate down through a CU-Structural Soil™ proﬁle after installation? The excavation of a seven-year-old installation did not show any aggregate migration. The pores between stones in CU-Structural Soil™ are mostly ﬁlled with soil so there are few empty spaces for soil to migrate to. Does hydrogel break down over time? Over a long period of time, the soluble salts from which the hydrogel was produced, i.e. potassium (from potas- sium hydroxide) and ammoniacal nitrogen (from acrylamide) is released. The inert hydrogel becomes a mini- mum part of the soil system. Beyond that, we believe that colonizing roots and other organisms will, over time, replace the spatial and tackifying roles of the hydrogel. Research on this subject is on-going. What happens when roots expand in CU-Structural Soil™? There will come a time when the roots will likely displace the stone, but if the roots are, as we have observed, deep down in the proﬁle, the pressure they generate during expansion would be spread over a larger surface area. We have seen roots move around the stone and actually surround some stones in older installations, rather than displace the stones. Is CU-Structural Soil™ susceptible to frost heave? This topic has not been rigorously tested, but we have not observed frost heave damage in the Ithaca, NY instal- lations. Based on drainage testing and swell data on this extremely porous system, CU-Structural Soil™ appears quite stable. Can you add normal soil in the tree pit and CU-Structural Soil™ under the pavement? It would be desirable to use CU-Structural Soil™ under the tree ball to prevent the root ball from sinking. Plant- ing trees directly in CU-Structural Soil™ provides a ﬁrmer base for unit pavers close to the root ball than does conventional soil. If the tree pit is sufﬁciently large, greater than 5’ x 5’, a conventional soil could be used in the open tree pit surrounding the root ball with CU-Structural Soil™ extending under the pavement. CALCULATING CROWN PROJECTION � r2 = ft2 Radius 13 Can you use balled-and-burlapped, bare root, or containerized trees in CU-Structural Soil™? Trees from any production system can and have been used. It is important to water the newly planted tree as would be expected in any soil. Should CU-Structural Soil™ be used in urban areas without pavement over the root zone? CU-Structural Soil™ was designed to be used where soil compaction is required, such as under sidewalks, park- ing lots, medians, plazas, and low-access roads. Where soils are not required to be compacted, a good, well- draining soil should be used. Can you store large quantities of CU-Structural Soil™? CU-Structural Soil™ is produced by licensed producers and is preferably not stockpiled. It is mixed as neces- sary and should be delivered and installed in a timely manner. If any stockpiling is required, protection from rain and contamination should be provided. Can CU-Structural Soil™ be utilized under existing trees? There are several instances where CU-Structural Soil™ was utilized under and adjacent to existing trees. It appears that if few tree roots are damaged during the installation, the trees continue to grow well. Research is currently under way to investigate this issue. What are the oldest installations of CU-Structural Soil™, and where are they? The two oldest installations date to 1994; the ﬁrst is a honeylocust planting at the Staten Island Esplanade Proj- ect in NYC, the second is a London plane tree planting on Ho Plaza on the Cornell campus, Ithaca, NY. There are now numerous installations of various sizes across the United States and Canada. For more information about installations, visit www.structuralsoil.com or contact Brian Kalter at Amereq, Inc. (see below). Obtaining CU-Structural Soil™ CU-Structural Soil™ has been patented and licensed to qualiﬁed producers to ensure quality control; its trade- marked names are CU-Structural Soil™ or CU-Soil™. By specifying this material, the contractor is guaran- teed to have the material mixed and tested to meet research-based speciﬁcations. There are licensed producers throughout the US and in Canada. To ﬁnd the one in your region or to become a licensee, contact Brian Kalter (bkalter@amereq.com) or Fernando Erazo (FE@amereq.com) at Amereq Inc., 19 Squadron Blvd. New City, New York 10956. (800) 832-8788 Further Information See the Urban Horticulture Institute website: www.hort.cornell.edu/uhi and go to Outreach > Structural Soil A DVD showing videos of the mixing, installation and tree growth in CU-Structural Soil™ is available at: www.hort.cornell.edu/uhi/outreach/csc/index.html Or contact Dr. Nina Bassuk (nlb2@cornell.edu), (607) 255-4586 Research papers supporting this work: • Evans, M., Bassuk, N.L. and Trowbridge, P.J. 1990. Street trees and sidewalk construction. Landscape Archi- tecture. 80(3) 102-103. • Goldstein, J., Bassuk, N.L., Lindsey, P., and Urban, J. 1991. From the Ground Down. Landscape Architec- ture, 81(1) 66-68. 14 • Lindsey, P. and Bassuk, N. 1991. Specifying Soil Volumes to Meet the Water Needs of Mature Urban Street Trees and Trees in Containers. Journal of Arboriculture. 17(6) 141-149. • Lindsey, P. and Bassuk, N.L. 1992. Redesigning the Urban Forest from the Ground Below: A New Approach to Specifying Adequate Soil Volumes for Street Trees. Arboricultural Journal. 16(1) 25-39. • Trowbridge, P. and Bassuk, N.L. 1999. Redesigning Paving Proﬁles for a More Viable Urban Forest. ASLA Proceedings Annual Conference, pp. 350-351. 13(2): 64-71. • Grabosky J. and Bassuk N.L. 1995. A New Urban Tree Soil to Safely Increase Rooting Volumes Under Side- walks. Journal of Arboriculture, 21(4) 187-201. • Grabosky, J., Bassuk, N.L. and Van Es, H. 1996. Testing of Structural Urban Tree Soil Materials for Use Un- der Pavement to Increase Street Tree Rooting Volumes. Journal of Arboriculture, Vol. 22 No. 6, 255-263. • Grabosky, J., Bassuk, N.L., Urban, J. and Trowbridge, P. 1998. Structural Soil: An Innovative Medium Under Pavement that Improves Street Tree Vigor. ASLA Proceedings Annual Conference, pp183-185. • Grabosky, J., Bassuk, N.L., Irwin, L., and Van Es, H. 1999. A Pilot Field Study of Structural Soil Materials in Pavement. The Landscape Below Ground II: Proceedings of an International Workshop on Tree Root Develop- ment in Urban Soils. San Francisco, CA: International Society of Arboriculture, 210-221. • Grabosky, J., Bassuk, N.L., Irwin, L., and Van Es, H. 1999. Structural Soil Investigations at Cornell Univer- sity. The Landscape Below Ground II: Proceedings of an International Workshop on Tree Root Development in Urban Soils. San Francisco, CA: International Society of Arboriculture, 203-209. • Grabosky, J., Bassuk, N.L., Irwin, L. and Van Es, H. 2001. Shoot and Root Growth of Three Tree Species in Sidewalks. J. Environmental Hort. 19(4):206-211. • Grabosky, J., Bassuk, N.L., and Marranca, M.B. 2002. Preliminary Findings from Measuring Street Tree Shoot growth in two Skeletal Soil Installations Compared to Tree Lawn Plantings. Journal of Arboriculture 28(2):106-108. • Loh, F.C.W., Grabosky, J.C., and Bassuk, N.L. 2003. Growth Response of Ficus benjamina to Limited Soil Volume and Soil Dilution in a Skeletal Soil Container Study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2(1):53-62. • Trowbridge, P. and Bassuk, N.L. 2004. ‘Trees in the Urban Landscape: Site Assessment, Design and Installa- tion’. Chapter 3:61-81. Wiley and Sons, Inc. 15 Fig 1.26 In this three-year ﬁeld study a normal soil proﬁle under sidewalk pavement as well as one with CU-Structural Soil™ were compared. Species used were hedge maple, little leaf linden, and crabapple.