Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST RIDGE THIRD FILING (FORMERLY EAST RIDGE - RESIDENTIAL) - PDP - PDP170006 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (2)Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview March 03, 2017 John Beggs Russell + Mills Studios 141 S COLLEGE AVE STE 104 Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: East Ridge Third Filing (formerly East Ridge - Residential), PDP170006, Round Number 1 Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com Topic: General 02/27/2017: The north portion of this development is Parts of Phase 8 and 9 and the west portion is Phase 5. Per the development agreement of East Ridge Second Filing, Phase 8 can only be done after or concurrently with Phase 1A, Phase 1B, Phase 3, Phase 4, Phase 6 and Phase 7. Phase 9 can only be done after or concurrently with Phase 1A, Phase 1B, Phase 3, Phase 4 and Phase 6. Phase 5 can only be done after or concurrently with Phase 1A, Phase 1B and Phase 2. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: Prior to the finalizing of this project, Utility Plan revisions will need to be finalized with East Ridge Second Filing. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: Since plans will be approved after the revisions to East Ridge Second Filing, the Existing Conditions sheets should reflect these revisions. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: The private drive on Tract M will need to be in an access easement. More information is needed to see how this portion of the drive will drain. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: Driveways that serve 12 or more units shall have a minimum width of 28 feet. Low traffic volume streets may be reduced to 24 feet. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: The minimum distance between high volume driveways and intersection is 150 feet. Please adjust the driveway spacing on Barnstormer. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com. Page 1 of 12 02/27/2017: The driveways on Vicot Way and Crusader Street do not meet the requirements for allowing Type III Driveways (High Volume Driveway). Since they are not commercial uses and don't meet the traffic warrants, Type I driveways at a minimum width of 28 feet will need to be used. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: The entrance angle for all driveway approaches and intersections shall be 90 degrees plus or minus 10 degrees for a minimum of 25 feet. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: What is happening to the temporary turn around on Barnstormer Street and Zeppelin way? Plans show for driveways to intersect the turnarounds, but they will be needed until the streets are extended. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: The meandering sidewalk along Timberline Road will need to be modified with East Ridge Second Filing. The sidewalk will need to be within an access easement. Since second filing plans will be approved prior to this proposal, it will need to be done be separate document. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: Private drive plan and profiles do not need to be in the Utility Plan set. They can be in here, but are not required. Please note that any changes after plans are approved will need to amend the Utility Plans. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: Based on the plan and profiles of the private drives, there are a couple of drives that drain more than the allowable 750 SF across a driveway. Please adjust. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: Alley intersection detail (LCUASS 803) will need to be replaced with Driveway details-706.1 for Type I driveways and 707.1 for high volume driveways (Type III). Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 02/27/2017: Private Drive signs will be needed at every driveway. It shall read: "Private Drive-Privately Maintained". Insert the actual private drive name if the drive will be named. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 02/27/2017 03/01/2017: Please look at the parking setbacks along Vicot Drive. LCUASS 19-6 will need to be used. A minimum of 20' from the flowline to the first parking stall is needed. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com Topic: General 02/10/2017: The project owes and additional $6,068.75 for PDP TDRFees. The project did not include the acreage or the base $2,000 fee in the total paid. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/10/2017 Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Page 2 of 12 02/28/2017: Landscape plans say “Transition Zone Seed Mix – Refer to wetland enlargement for mix information,” however, did not see a wetland enlargement sheet. By Final Plan and prior to project approval include the seed mix on East Ridge Third filing and technical specs for proper installation and expectations to be achieved prior to acceptance of the area by the City. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Landscape plan note 16 refers to natural habitat buffer zone (NHBZ) however, do not believe NHBZ is included in any piece of third filing. Please confirm and provide update by Final Plan. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Topic: Lighting Plan 02/28/2017: Unclear as to what luminaires shall be ordered for photometric plan. Include a table calling out clearly which fixtures and bulbs are to be used. In regard to lighting, especially LED light fixtures, cooler color temperatures are harsher at night and cause more disruption to circadian (biological) rhythms for both humans and wildlife thus warmer white 3000K or less are requested. By Final Plan and prior to project approval provide catalog cut sheets for luminaires and identify which specific corrected color temperature shall be ordered. This significantly aids city staff if and when there are post-construction compliance issues or lighting complaints. Several departments within the City of Fort Collins have been working together to address this issue; they are referred to as the City’s Night Sky team. Results of the team’s work can currently be viewed on the City’s Public Records website in Resolution 2016-074, a summary of City of Fort Collins City Council Intent and General Policy Regarding Night Sky Objectives. For further information regarding health effects please see: http://darksky.org/ama-report-affirms-human-health-impacts-from-leds/ Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, , mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans 03/03/2017: Please evaluate adding ornamental trees in planting beds along public streets. These are the planting beds that face the street between buildings and the sidewalk. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/03/2017 03/03/2017: Please show the existing plum thicket, which is shown to be retained. On the original submittal, it is show on the north edge of the project, and should continue to be shown for reference on the plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/03/2017 Department: Light And Power Contact: Coy Althoff, 970-224-6150, CAlthoff@fcgov.com Topic: General 02/28/2017: Light and Power will have both single and 3-phase power to this development as a part of the East Ridge 2nd filing subdivision (which is currently under construction.) Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Page 3 of 12 02/28/2017: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this development. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Multi family buildings (anything beyond a duplex) are treated as commercial services; therefore a(C 1) form must be filled out and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. All secondary electric service work is the responsibility of the developer and their electrical consultant or contractor. The C-1 form can be found at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1Form.pdf Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: As your project continues to move forward please contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the streetlight, transformer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Streetlights will be placed along public streets. A 40 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. A 15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental trees and streetlights. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: The location of the water and electric services will need to be coordinated with Light and Power Engineering. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 03/03/2017: You may contact FCU Light & Power, project engineering if you have questions. (970) 221-6700. You may reference Light & Power¿s Electric Service Standards at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandards_F INAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdf You may reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/03/2017 Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Brian Zick, , Topic: General Page 4 of 12 03/03/2017: Boxelder Sanitation: The District hereby advises as follows: 0 There is no objection to this proposal. 0 Responses required to comments below. 0 The District will respond at the hearing date of _ Comments: 1) Provisions are needed for maintenance vehicles to access proposed MH north of EXMH 1 on 18 inch sanitary sewer (Sheet UT01). Locate proposed MH further north, away from storm drain inlet; possibly within 30-foot landscape setback area to avoid future disruption of landscaped area when sewer is extended. 2) Tract F 20-foot utility easement appears to be inadequate for both water and sewer utilities. Location of sewer scales out to be 3 feet from edge of easement and private drive (Sheet UT03). The District has adequate capacity to service the property referenced above. The District is in full compliance with Federal and State water quality requirements. We look forward to review future submittals on this project. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Brian Zick, P.E. District Engineer Comment Number: Comment Originated: 03/03/2017 Department: PFA Contact: Cal Sheesley, 970-416-2599, csheesley@poudre-fire.org Topic: General 02/20/2017: RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM The original CDR plans referenced a Multi-Family (commercial) component. The current plans show only Single-Family Attached (residential) products with no M-F component. The sprinkler system requirements for fee-simple, Single Family Attached units may be met with combination residential sprinkler systems (eg. P-2904), provided there is adequate fire separation between units. Contact the Building Department for further details. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/20/2017 Page 5 of 12 02/20/2017: WATER SUPPLY Hydrant spacing and flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. A hydrant is required within 400' of any Residential Building as measured along an approved path of vehicle travel, on 800' centers there after. > Hydrant separation in Tract B exceeds minimum hydrant separation distances. > Hydrant separation in Tract F does not meet minimum hydrant separation distances. An additional hydrant is needed at the NE corner of the intersection of Private Drive AA and Private Drive DD. > An additional hydrant will be required along Timberline in order to meet minimum code requirements and correct existing hydrant separation deficiencies in this area. This additional hydrant should be located at or about the area west of Lot 15. Code language provided below for planning purposes: > IFC 507.5 and PFA Policy: RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS: Within the Urban Growth Area, hydrants to provide 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter. CLEAR SPACE AROUND HYDRANTS > IFC 507.5.5: A 3-foot clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants except as otherwise required or approved. PHYSICAL PROTECTION > IFC 507.5.6: Where fire hydrants are subject to impact by a motor vehicle, guard post or other approved means shall comply with section 312. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/20/2017 Page 6 of 12 02/21/2017: FIRE LANES Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building. For the purposes of this section, fire access cannot be measured from an arterial road (Timberline). Any private alley or private drive serving as a fire lane shall be dedicated as an Emergency Access Easement (EAE) and be designed to standard fire lane specifications. The following fire lane comments are relative to the latest Site Plan. > The western end of Tract B creates a dead-end road in excess of 150' which requires an approved turnaround or through connection. The Site Plan refers to a drive connection back to Barnstormer St, indicated as Tract M, at this location. Tract M will require dedication as an EAE either with this plat or as an off-site easement, by separate document. > Minimum fire lane width is 20' which is the width of all proposed private drives. As such, no parking will be allowed along any proposed drive. > Turning radii should be provided on future plans. > Fire lane specifications provided below for your planning purposes. FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: > Shall be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement. > Maintain the required 20 foot minimum unobstructed width & 14 foot minimum overhead clearance. > Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface capable of supporting 40 tons. > Dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. > The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. > Be visible by painting and/or signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. Sign locations or red curbing should be labeled and detailed on final plans. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 02/21/2017: FIRE LANE MARKING As fire lanes shall remain unobstructed at all times, fire Lane boundaries shall be fully defined by signage. Please include the limits of the fire lane with clearly marked and approved signage in future plans. Be advised, new signage standards have been adopted and can be found in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LUCASS), specifically Drawing 1418 and 1419. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 Page 7 of 12 02/21/2017: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION & WAYFINDING The proposed plans does not indicate naming of the private drives (Tract B, F, & J). A effective means of providing intuitive wayfinding throughout the site will be required. A plan for street naming is requested along with a wayfinding plan to include monument, pole and/or other means of signage to aid in navigating the private drives. Due to the orientation of dwelling units on this site, every unit will require address posting on the front and rear of every unit. The posting of the street name will also be required on some buildings, as defined by local amendments provided below. A comprehensive plan will be required prior to final plan approval. Please contact PFA with any questions or to seek assistance with this matter. Code language provided below. ADDRESS POSTING - LOCAL AMENDMENT > IFC 505.1.7: Buildings, either individually or part of a multi-building complex, that have fire lanes on sides other than the addressed street side, shall have the address numbers and street name on each side that fronts the fire lane. ADDRESS POSTING - LOCAL AMENDMENT > IFC 505.1.8: Buildings that are addressed on one street, but are accessible from other streets, shall have the address numbers AND STREET NAME on each side that is accessible form another street. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/21/2017 Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray@fcgov.com Topic: General 03/03/2017: Coordination of sidewalk along Timberline Road. With Filing 2. As discussed at conceptual review and at staff review last Wednesday, we are coordinating inclusion of regional trail with this approved 6' walk. We need to confirm with Filing 3 applicant the upgrade from a 6' walk to a 10' colored path. Parks will fund the additional 4' of pavement and take over maintenance of this path. The additional 4' can be added on west side of sidewalk alignment of split 2' on either side. The landscaping and irrigation will need to be adjusted to accommodate this wider sidewalk. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/03/2017 Topic: Lighting Plan 02/28/2017: Lighting plan needs more information including lighting legend that shows ordering information, quantities, performance standards etc. Need details for all fixtures for walkways, drives, building wall mounted fixtures and any bollards. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Topic: Site Plan 02/28/2017: Cover Sheet - separate owner certification signature box from Planning Certification signature box. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Page 8 of 12 02/28/2017: Updated comments for LS101, LS 401, LS 402. rear facing building entrances that do not comply with LUC Section 3.5.2 (D) for relationship of dwellings to streets (unit entrances are more than 200' from street and not in compliance with LUC Article 5 (page 12) definition for a connecting walkway. The units with entrances facing north have a greater distance to connect to a public street than 200'. This connecting walkway is not a major walkway spine. Given the narrowness of this tract and inability to connect to E. Vine Drive, a Modification is needed. by including this extra row of units on north side, design options are limited to make it work. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 02/28/2017: Existing Conditions Plan: There are several segments of storm line that were revised recently under the East Ridge Second Filing project. These revised storm lines should be represented here on the existing conditions plan. Also, there are several “proposed” items that don’t belong on the existing conditions plan. Its difficult to follow what the baseline condition is going to be for these parcels when this plan shows a combination of existing (or soon to be existing) and proposed. See my redlined comments. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Grading Plan: Please note that all swales less than 2% will need to either be installed with a “soft pan” or a concrete plan. Please include callouts and details for these as needed. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Grading Plan: for the two temporary turnaround areas it’s unclear which roadway configuration you’re proposing. Are the temporary turnarounds going away with this project? If so, they should be removed from the proposed condition plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Grading Plan: There are storm lines shown along the west side of the buildings in Tract G. These don’t appear to be placed in conjunction with low points. What is the intent of these lines? Are you connecting roof drains into them? Please include some callouts or labels in the plans to clarify. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Grading Plan: Please include spot elevations at inlets and low points and slope arrows with percentage labels. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Utility Plan: The proposed storm pipes should be somehow differentiated from the “existing” storm pipes that are being installed with the East Ridge Second Filing project. Callouts to these pipes should reference the 3rd filing not the 2nd. Storm pipes should all be labeled as “private” and approximate sizes should be included in the plans. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Utility Plan: it looks like the utility easement along the alleyways is overlapping with the building footprint. This should be corrected. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Page 9 of 12 02/28/2017: Utility Plan: The proposed storm pipes look close to the building footprints, water lines and to the irrigation pipe in a couple of locations. Please note that storm pipes should be a minimum of 10’ from buildings and other utilities. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Topic: Drainage Report 02/28/2017: Thank you for including the email summary of how the LID requirements will be met with this project. I think keeping the email as a part of the appendix to this report is a good idea. However, please also include the LID summary and percent calculations in the body of the report narrative. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: The Table included on page 10 shows “proposed” volumes for the various EDB/LID systems. Please clarify/verify that you aren’t proposing to change the volumes in the sand filters and water quality ponds that are being built as a part of ERSF. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Area inlet calculations look to include 3 grates in the rating table. Are you assuming three inlets/grates at every inlet location? Please clarify. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Street capacity calculations table doesn’t make sense to me. It looks like there is not adequate street capacity at the low point. Please clarify. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Many of the storm design sheets from ERSF that are included in the appendix are now older versions of the design as revision sheets have been submitted and approved. Please include those revised sheets in this report instead. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Drainage Map: It would be helpful to also include the original basin labels (maybe ghosted back) on the map since these original basins are referenced in this report (i.e. Fut A, Fut B, Fut H, Fut I) Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 02/28/2017: Drainage Map: It looks like the basins fronting Barnstormer Drive and Timberline Road drain onto the roadways. For Barnstormer, street capacity and inlet capacities should be re-analyzed to verify that they can handle the additional runoff. For Timberline, the original report did not show or assume runoff onto Timberline and we won’t allow developed runoff onto Timberline. Please clarify your intent and the design along Timberline. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Topic: Landscape Plans 02/28/2017: Please include the proposed storm pipes in these plans and ensure that you’re meeting the required separation distances between the storm lines and trees and shrubs. Also, swale centerlines should be shown on these plans and trees should not be placed along the centerline. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 02/28/2017 Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Page 10 of 12 02/15/2017: 2/15/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft., therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan, an Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. Also, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/15/2017 Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 03/02/2017: Please change the sub-title to match the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/02/2017 03/02/2017: Please revise the Benchmark Statement as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/02/2017 03/02/2017: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/02/2017 03/02/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/02/2017 Topic: Landscape Plans 03/01/2017: Please remove the "Dash" from the title & title blocks. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 Topic: Plat 03/01/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 Topic: Site Plan 03/01/2017: Please remove the "Dash" from the title & title blocks. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 Department: Traffic Operation Page 11 of 12 Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn@fcgov.com Topic: General 03/01/2017: Please include an accounting of reserve trips at Vine and Lemay. If the previously approved trips plus the trips from this development are under the reserved capacity no additional traffic analysis is needed. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: Please provide raised crosswalks along barnstormer. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General 03/01/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 Department: Zoning Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970-416-2338, mglasgow@fcgov.com Topic: General 03/01/2017: How will trash be handled? If there are trash enclosures, this will need to be shown on the site plan with elevations. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: The photometric site plan does not include cut sheets for proposed light fixtures. Please include cut sheets of the proposed fixtures. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: Please include detailed elevations of all proposed building types. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 03/01/2017: Elevations will need to include how mechanical equipment is screened from public view and how conduit, meters and vents are painted to match surrounding building surfaces. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/01/2017 Page 12 of 12