Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout625 S. PETERSON MULTI-FAMILY - PDP - PDP160005 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - REVISIONSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview February 26, 2016 Brad Massey ALM2S 712 WHALERS WAY, SUITE B-100 Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: 625 S Peterson Multi-Family, PDP160005, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com. Comment Response Letter - Responses shown below in highlighted red text. 5/31/16 alm2s and TST Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: It appears there are a few discrepancies between the elevations and perspectives shown. Please revise the elevations so they match the elevations. Response: Perspectives have been deleted. Elevations have been updated based on comments from the two rounds of LPC review. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016 02/24/2016: Portions of the building along both the northern and southern property line does not comply with the maximum wall height standards outlined in Land Use Code section 4.8(E)(4). This standard states that any wall that exceeds 18' in height as measured from the natural grade at the interior lot line adjacent to the wall must be setback an additional 1' for every 2' the wall exceeds 18'. In order to have a wall height of 29' as shown, the building would have to be set back at least 11' from the north property line. Alternatively, the building can step back 1' for every 2' above 18'. You will either need a modification to this standard or will need to adjust the elevations accordingly. Response: A modification to the standard is being requested. A setback illustration in elevation and roof plan is shown on sheet 6, Architectural Elevations. The need to request a variance could be avoided by using a standard hip or dutch hip vs. a straight gable roofline but we feel that a gable roof form is more appropriate for the neighborhood context. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/17/2016 02/17/2016: Comment from GIS - Projects with three or more tenant units require the Unit Level Addressing form to be completed and submitted to the GIS Department after plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. This can occur anytime during construction, but before any utilities or address signs are installed. All addressing will be determined by the GIS Department and submitted to Poudre Fire Authority, USPS, Building Services, and Fort Collins Utilities. Failure to contact GIS and determining addresses through other means may result in address change The Unit Level Addressing form can be obtained by contacting the GIS office after the plans are recorded at gis@fcgov.com or (970) 416-2483. Response: As noted, will be completed after plans have met final approval. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Since a portion of the proposed fence on the southern property line exceeds 6' in height, you will need to submit a modification request to Land Use Code section 3.8.11(C)(3). Response: Extending the fence up to 8’ along a portion of the south property was a request from the neighbor to the south for additional privacy. We will include this in our modification request. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Please submit proposed elevations for the fence to be installed along the south property line. Response: An elevation of the 8’ high section of fence is included on the site plan sheet. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Sexton, 970-221-6501, ksexton@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: Please show required utility easements (8¿' along alley, 9¿' behind sidewalk along Peterson) on site plan and utility plan. If the property is not being re-platted, the easements will need to be dedicated by separate document per the procedures outlined here: http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/pdf/Easrowdedications2010.pdf Response: These are now shown on the Utility and Site Plans. They will be registered by separate document. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: The scale indicated by the site plan suggests that the trash enclosure is partially within the area where there will be a required utility easement (8'¿ width along alley). If the enclosure requires a building permit, it will not be permitted in the easement (this is height dependent and a zoning topic). Response: The height of the trash enclosure has been reduced to 5’-8” with elevations shown on the site plan sheet, therefore a building permit will not be required. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: Please add visual/bar scale to the site plan so that distances can be measured even if the image gets printed or reproduced not to scale. Response: This has been added to the plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: The most recent detail for the chase drain with detached sidewalk is City of Fort Collins Utilities Stormwater Construction Detail D-10B. I can send a copy of this to you. Response: This has been added to the plans. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/12/2016 02/12/2016: A detailed planting plan should be provided, including species names, numbers, and sizes for all trees, shrubs, perennials and grasses. Response: This will be provided at final design, after P&Z. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/12/2016 02/12/2016: Please add a note to the lighting plan that fixture A2 shall be installed using the down-directional option. Response: A note calling for “DOWN DIRECTIONAL” was added to the fixture schedule. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: The following are a couple of types of trees that the project may want to consider in landscape areas near the buildings. Chanticleer Pear Pyrus calleryana ‘Chanticleer’ Thunderchild Crabapple Malus ‘Thunderchild’ Response: These have been added to the plant table. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: In the landscape areas along the south and north boundary to the parking area these are some narrow crowed trees the project may want to consider. Skyrocket Juniper Woodward juniper Crimson Spire Oak Response: These have been added to the plant table. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: Please use the City of Fort Collins General landscape notes on the plan. These notes are available from Clay Frickey the Project Planner or from The City Forester 221 6361. Response: These have been added to the plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: Add to the tree inventory and mitigation table an additional column that provides a brief explanation why each removed tree will not be retained. This may include a full statement at the bottom of the table identify with a code number or letter placed in the table. Response: This has been added to the table. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: Provide a brief explanation why additional major trees cannot be retained. Reference the definition of Retaining trees to the extent reasonably feasible. Extent reasonably feasible shall mean that, under the circumstances, reasonable efforts have been undertaken to comply with the regulation, that the costs of compliance clearly outweigh the potential benefits to the public or would unreasonably burden the proposed project, and reasonable steps have been undertaken to minimize any potential harm or adverse impacts resulting from noncompliance with the regulation. Response: This note has been added to the plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: Please place the following note on the utility plan Demolition plan sheet 3 of 9. All tree inventory, retention and protection requirements on Landscape Plan sheet 4 of 6 shall be followed. Response: This note has been added to the Demo Plan. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: Identify all the species of trees, shrubs and other landscape plants in the plant schedule and also provide a direct label to these plants. Response: This will be provided at final design, after P&Z. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: Review the appropriate spacing of these narrow crowed trees with the project Landscape Architect. A wider spacing than shown may be advised. Response: The tree spacing has been adjusted. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: List the percentage of each tree species used as a percentage of total trees. Check percentages used to meet the minimum species diversity standard in LUC 3.2.1 D 3. Response: This will be provided at final design, after P&Z. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016 02/25/2016: The project may want to review the tree planting details with a qualified horticultural or landscape professional and make changes as recommended. Things like backfill amendment, the removal or partial removal of burlap and wire basket and possibly other items could be reviewed. Response: This will be provided at final design, after P&Z. Department: Internal Services Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/26/2016 02/26/2016: Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com/building web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. Response: A pre-submittal meeting was held with the Building Department and the codes noted above will be followed as a part of our final construction drawing package to be submitted for building permit review. Department: Light And Power Contact: Todd Vedder, 970-224-6152, tvedder@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Dwelling unit charges will apply for the additional units being added. Each unit must be individually metered. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Developer will be responsible for getting to the transformer with secondary service. Currently the nearest source of power is single phase power coming from the alley. Coordinate with Light & Power on this interconnection. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Please review our Electric Construction Policies, Practices & Procedures for transformer and metering requirements. A link to this document is below. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo rms-guidelines-regulations Response: This has been reviewed. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Need to ensure power has a 10' separation with all water lines and 3' separation between gas lines. This only applies to parallel runs and not crossings. Response: Noted. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Will the units be gas or electric heat? Also please identify main breaker sizing for each unit so transformer sizing can be met. Response: The units will have gas-fired furnaces. Panel sizing & circuiting will be done as a part of the construction drawings once entitlement approval is completed. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/19/2016 02/19/2016: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (With redlines) , Erosion Control Report (not found), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (not found). If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Response: A report and calcs are being submitted at this time. Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: The maximum allowable side slope permitted for grass-lined and rock mulch slopes is 4:1. Would Swale D work better as a concrete pan? Additionally, the outlet for this swale will need to be through a concrete chase as runoff across a sidewalk is not allowed. Response: Swale D has been changed to a concrete pan with a chase under the sidewalk. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: The existing impervious area documentation only applies to the detention requirement. For LID and water quality, all new or modified impervious area will need to be treated. Please revise the LID appropriately since only Basin A is being treated, which does not equal 93.54% of the new or modified impervious area. Additionally, water quality will need to be provided for the new or modified impervious area in Basins B and C. Assuming the LID treatment in Basin A meets the 50% site treatment requirement, the remainder of the site can either be treated through LID or standard water quality methods. Response: After further discussion on site constraints, a variance is being submitted to cover WQCV in Basins B and C. Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Please modify the calculations and text in the drainage report to be consistent with modifications required in Comment 3. Response: This has been updated. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: These lines have been removed from the building elevations. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: These have been corrected. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: Please remove "Site &" from the sheet title. See redlines. Response: Correction made. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Correction made. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: Sheet 1 of 6 is missing from the set. Response: Sheet 1 was submitted as a part of the overall package. It is the cover sheet with a vicinity map, general notes, ownership information and required signature blocks. Please coordinate with Clay if you did not receive a copy. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: Please remove "& Lighting" from the sheet title. See redlines. Response: Correction made. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/22/2016 02/22/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Correction made. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016 02/24/2016: no comments Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Please label pipe material for all proposed and existing water and sewer mains and services. Response: Proposed material has been added. Existing material is unknown at this time. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Is the existing sewer service assumed to be coming from Peterson St to remain or be abandoned? Please clarify in the plans. Response: We were unable to locate the existing service location, but nearby lots are serviced from Peterson and the assumption is that this lot is also. Regardless, the existing sewer service will be abandon. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Please move the meter pit behind the property line and label the proposed water service connection. Response: Meter pit has been moved and connection to ex main has been called out on the Utility Plan. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Please add the bedding details for water and wastewater. Response: Bedding details have been added. Department: Zoning Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avandeutekom@fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Rear yard fences can not exceed 6' tall. Is there a reason you are purposing an 8' tall fence? Response: Only a short section of fence along the south property line just east of the existing detached garage is being proposed as 8’ high. This was a specific request by the neighbors directly to the south for increased privacy. The remainder of the fence is proposed as 6’ high. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016 02/23/2016: Trash enclosures over 6' tall require a separate building permit. Response: The proposed trash enclosure height has been reduced to 5’-8”. Reference the elevations on the site plan sheet.