HomeMy WebLinkAboutJEFFERSON & LINDEN RESTAURANT - PDP - PDP160030 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS (7)City of Fort Collins Page 1 November 9, 2016
Doug Ernest, Acting Chair City Council Chambers
Meg Dunn City Hall West
Bud Frick 300 Laporte Avenue
Kristin Gensmer Fort Collins, Colorado
Per Hogestad
Dave Lingle Cablecast on FCTV Channel 14 and
Alexandra Wallace 881 (HD) on the Comcast cable system
Belinda Zink
The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to City services, programs, and activities
and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 (TDD 224-
6001) for assistance.
Regular Meeting
11/9/16
Minutes – Excerpt for Jefferson & Linden
• CALL TO ORDER
Acting Chair Ernest called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m.
• ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Dunn, Zink, Wallace, Gensmer, Lingle, Ernest
ABSENT: Hogestad, Frick
STAFF: McWilliams, Bzdek, Bumgarner, Yatabe, Schiager
2. JEFFERSON AND LINDEN RESTAURANT (PDP160030) - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a proposed design for a restaurant at the northwest corner of
Jefferson Street and Linden Street. The building consists of a single story
building of 5,690 square feet with a patio dining space on the east end of
the building facing Linden Street. The building will share parking with
Rodizio in the lot to the west. The development site is within the Old Town
Fort Collins National Register Historic District as well as the River District.
Final review will be a Type 1 hearing with a hearing officer.
APPLICANT: Chris Aronson, Vaught Frye Larson Architects
Ms. Gensmer & Ms. Wallace both noted having missed the two previous meetings on this topic, but
said they had reviewed the videos and are prepared to participate.
Landmark
Preservation
Commission
City of Fort Collins Page 2 November 9, 2016
Chair Ernest reviewed the order of proceedings for this item. Mr. Yatabe clarified that this item, as a
recommendation to the decision maker, is not appealable.
Staff Report
Ms. Bzdek presented some background information and details about the area of adjacency and buildings
included therein. She also summarized the design updates since the previous meeting and reviewed the
staff analysis of the project based on Land Use Code Section 3.4.7(F)1-5. Staff has found that the
proposed project has a massing, setback, visual connections, window patterning, and prominent primary
entrance are compatible with the Union Pacific depot. The proposed project utilizes materials compatible
with the area of adjacency, does not impede existing visual and pedestrian connections, and will preserve
existing trees to the maximum extent feasible.
Applicant Presentation
Mr. Aronson explained changes made to the materials, entrance and roof based on the Commission’s
input. He stated horizontal banding has been removed to create a more vertical rhythm and described the
proportions of the materials in the updated design.
Public Input
None.
Staff Response
Ms. Bzdek had no additional information.
Commission Questions and Discussion
Ms. Dunn moved that the Landmark Preservation Commission recommend to the Decision Maker
approval of the Jefferson and Linden Project Development Plan (PDP160030), finding it is in
compliance with the standards contained in Land Use Code section 3.4.7 in regard to compatibility
with the character of the project’s area of adjacency for the reasons stated in the staff report.
Ms. Gensmer seconded.
Ms. Dunn commented that the applicant did a great job of utilizing the Commission’s comments regarding
the entry way.
Ms. Wallace stated the ultimate building design is better than the original design and commended the use
of grey brick.
Mr. Lingle agreed with Ms. Dunn and Ms. Wallace and expressed appreciation for the efforts of the
applicant and their willingness to reexamine the design. He stated the building material selection and the
way it has been used complies with Section 3.4.7 F3 and commented the design provides a nice
connection between the Historic Downtown District and the River District. He commended Ms. Bzdek’s
staff report.
Ms. Gensmer commented on the evolution of the design and its response to Commission comments. She
stated she does not have any concerns with regard to the project complying with the applicable Code
sections.
Ms. Zink expressed appreciation for the efforts of the applicant and stated the new design captures visual
elements of the Jefferson storefronts without copying them. She commended the building’s symmetry,
articulation, and use of materials to tie in the railroad.
Chair Ernest agreed with the other comments, adding the changes have brought the project into
compliance with all components of Section 3.4.7 F. He complimented the applicant’s presentation.
Ms. Dunn complemented the design and its inclusion of old and new elements and agreed with Ms. Zink’s
comment regarding the railroad.
The motion passed 6:0.
3.