HomeMy WebLinkAboutBEEBE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL - PDP - PDP160022 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
August 12, 2016
Cathy Mathis
TB GROUP
444 MOUNTAIN AVENUE
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: Beebe Christian School, PDP160022, Round Number 1
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Katie Sexton, 970-221-6501, ksexton@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/09/2016: ROW should be dedicated to the back of the sidewalk along Joseph
Allen Drive. ROW or an access easement should be dedicated on the portion of the
sidewalk along Nancy Gray that is not currently in the ROW. Both sections of ROW
can be one dedication of ROW by separate document. For more information on
dedicating easements by separate document please see:
http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/pdf/Easrowdedications2010.pdf
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: A standard 9 foot utility easement will need to be dedicated along
Joseph Allen Drive behind the future ROW. This easement should be shown on
both the site plan and the utility plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: The driveways onto Nancy Gray should be designed to the LCUASS
standard driveway approach detail with detached walk (706.1) and as such should
be concrete to the ROW. Please update the plan drawings, remove the street
intersection detail, and replace with 706.1.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com
Topic: General
07/28/2016: An additional $695 is due for the TDRF. There was not a plat included
with the project, but according to the Larimer County website the parcel size is 6.11
acres, which differs from that included in the fee sheet and that is why the
difference.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/28/2016
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for
your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may
contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ryan Mounce, at
970-224-6186 or rmounce@fcgov.com.
Page 1 of 11
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
08/08/2016: Please use the same seed mix for the temporary erosion control
seeding that will ultimately be used for the native seed areas shown on the
landscape plans.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Topic: Landscape Plans
08/08/2016: It looks like the plant list table is cut off on the first sheet of the site plan
- some of the perennials and grasses listed on the next page are missing.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Topic: Lighting Plan
08/08/2016: Will light fixture D1 be installed under an awning or canopy? If so, it
should be fully recessed so that the lamp is not visible from the street.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: In regard to LED light fixtures, cooler color temperatures are harsher at
night and cause more disruption to circadian rhythms for both humans and wildlife.
For the light fixtures that have been selected, it looks like most or all of them are
available in a 3000K version (warmer color temperature). Please consider using the
3000K versions, as well as versions with dimming capabilities so that light levels
can be adjusted as needed.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
08/12/2016:
Are there any existing trees on the site? If so contact the City Forester for an onsite
meeting to evaluated and receive tree inventory and mitigation information.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/12/2016
08/12/2016:
Show location of any stop signs and street lights. Identify these fixtures with a
distinct symbol. Space trees if needed as follows.
Stop Signs: 20 feet from sign
Street Light: 40 feet for canopy shade trees and 15 feet for ornamental trees
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/12/2016
08/12/2016:
Check the application of Minimum Tree Species Diversity Standard LUC 3.2.1 D 3
and adjust totals to meet the standard. For projects with 20-39 trees maximum
percentage of any one species is 33%. Currently the shade tree species are greater
than 33%. Explore adding a third canopy shade tree species.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/12/2016
08/12/2016:
Street trees appear to be spaced closer than 30 feet. The LUC standard is spacing
at 30-40 feet. Adjust spacing of street trees.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/12/2016
Page 2 of 11
08/12/2016:
Add size and method of transplant for trees and other landscape plants to the plant
list on final landscape plan.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/12/2016
08/12/2016:
Street trees should be spaced at least 8 feet from curb cuts or driveways. The first
street tree west of the east parking entrance off Nancy Gray is quite close. Evaluate
and adjust the location of this street tree.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/12/2016
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Coy Althoff, , CAlthoff@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/09/2016: 3-Phase power is available to this area.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges
and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this development.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the transformer
and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans.
***NOTE*** Transformer minimum clearances are 8' from the front and 3' around
the back and sides and must be within 10' of a paved surface.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and Power
Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1Form.pdf
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: You may contact FCU Light & Power, project engineering if you have
questions. (970) 221-6700. You may reference Light & Power¿s Electric Service
Standards at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandards_F
INAL_17June2016.pdf
You may reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee
estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Ryan Mounce, 970-224-6186, rmounce@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/09/2016: Comment made by Don Kapperman, Comcast, 970-484-7166.
Run 2'' conduit from IT Room out to Comcast Pedestal.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Page 3 of 11
07/28/2016: FIRE LANES
Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building, or facility
as measured by an approved route around the building perimeter. The proposed site
plan does not provide for sufficient fire access as defined by the fire code. The first
phase plan places the building approximately 130' out of access while the future
planned expansion will increase the out-of-access condition to approximately 300'.
Dedicating the parking area on the south side of the building as an Emergency
Access Easement will improve the condition but will not fully resolve the problem.
PFA is asking the project team to formulate a plan which will resolve access issues
for both the short and long-range site configurations. Code language below.
> IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building or
portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction.
The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section
and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the
exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the building or facility. When any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150
feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code official is authorized to increase the
dimension if the building is equipped throughout with an approved, automatic
fire-sprinkler system.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/28/2016
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Ryan Mounce, 970-224-6186, rmounce@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/02/2016: The current location of the building does not meet Land Use Code
requirements for the build-to line and the location of vehicle areas.
The building should be situated to anchor either the Timberline/Nancy Gray or Nancy
Gray/Joseph Allen corners and be setback no more than 15ft from the street, or as
close as possible given existing easements. Parking areas should be located either
to the side or rear of the building rather than between the front entrance and the
street.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: The parking spaces located closest to Nancy Gray need to be a
minimum of 10-feet from the property line, but currently appear to be dimensioned
as 8.7 feet from the property line.
Parking lot perimeter landscaping standards also require trees to be planted at
25-feet intervals along the Nancy Gray frontage in the 10' vehicle setback areas.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: Is the legal description for the site correct or does the site need platting?
Online assessor records are ambiguous on size/platting. If the property is not
platted, a new subdivision plat will need to be submitted as part of the proposal.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: Canopy shade trees are required along the Timberline Rd frontage at a
spacing of 30-to-40 feet.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
Page 4 of 11
08/02/2016: Additional trees are needed to meet Land Use Code tree-stocking
standards. Traditionally such trees are located closer to the building, but there is
flexibility for other site locations to define spaces such as the sports fields or patio
areas.
One area in particular that could use additional tree plantings would be the
frontage/detention areas along Timberline Road, continuing the existing theme of
tree plantings (ornamentals & blue spruce) utilized by the Timberline Center
developments.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: The outdoor bike rack should be enlarged for additional spaces. 5
outdoor spaces are listed but the label indicates space for only 4 bikes.
Additional bike parking will be needed when the church expansion is reviewed.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: If the current building placement remains in a similar location, a
walkway is needed to connect from the Nancy Gray sidewalk to the building
entrance. If crossing drive-aisle(s), the walkway should emphasize the pedestrian
with markings, raised pavements, different materials, etc.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: Please indicate with a narrative/exhibit or notes on the site plan how
pick-up/drop-off for students will work and expected times in the morning and
afternoon.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: The east building façade facing Timberline Road features large blank
walls that do not meet design requirements in the interim prior to the church
expansion.
Additional articulation and interest is needed prior to construction of the expansion.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: Additional information is needed on the building design and footprint:
- To what degree are sections of the north and west sides of the building being
projected or recessed? The elevations appear to indicate such recesses or
projections, but the building outline on the site plan is flush. The Land Use Code
requires projecting or recessed elements if the height/width ratio of building sides
exceeds 1:3.
- Please provide information on building materials and colors. Please add sample
images of proposed building materials/finishes/colors to the elevations.
- Base treatment: will there be a difference in color between the split face and
ground face CMU blocks? A cap or ledge at the transition between the two blocks
would better define the building base.
- Top treatment: Does the stucco shown on the building tops also represent a
cornice or are the lines only representative of a scoring pattern?
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/02/2016: Please dimension the separation between the fence and the Joseph
Allen Drive sidewalk. The fence must be constructed a minimum of two feet from
the back edge of the sidewalk.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
Page 5 of 11
08/02/2016: On the site plan, please show the full site boundaries extending out to
the Timberline Road frontage. This may require moving the site data tables from the
right-hand site to the bottom of the sheet.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 08/02/2016
08/09/2016: Is there an estimated timeline for the future church expansion? We'll
want to indicate as much information on the site plan about the expansion as
possible, and add the following general note:
"A future building expansion is anticipated in the dashed box labeled 'expansion area'
for a church or school use only. Future expansion shall require City approval by
minor or major amendment (as applicable)."
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/08/2016: Grading Plan – Please include slope labels on the grading plan.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Grading Plan – Please include a sidewalk chase at the outlet point of
the swale in the play area.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Drainage Report – This report references the Timberline Road
Widening project for the regional picture for stormwater. There are also other
drainage analyses that have been done in this area and will need to be utilized in
fully formulating the stormwater analysis for this site. Please refer to the Spring
Creek Farms Drainage Report and the Police Services Building Drainage Report for
additional information.
• The Timberline Road Widening project included this site’s basin (basin 8) in the
overall drainage analysis but it only assumed an undeveloped condition.
• The Spring Creek Farms drainage report also included this site’s basin (basin 8) in
the overall drainage analysis. It assumed a developed condition for basin 11
(Timberline Road that contributes to this pond, a developed condition for basin 12, a
portion of what is now the Police Services Building, and the undeveloped condition
of the basin that is for this site (basin 8).
• The Police Services drainage report shows that its basins 101 and 113 drain into
the detention pond on this site and are within the assumptions included in the Spring
Creek Farms drainage analysis. It appears as though a portion of this pond capacity
is utilized by the Policy Services Building and there was an agreement between
property owners that allows this.
• The result of all of these reports is that this project will need to re-analyze the
capacity and volume requirements for this pond based on a developed condition for
this site. Contributing basins on Timberline and Nancy Gray should be included,
contributing basins from the Police Services site and the developed condition from
this site should all be included in the capacity analysis for this pond.
• All of the above mentioned drainage reports can be found on Citydocs on our
website. Please contact me if you need help finding these.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Drainage Report – it is hard to determine if the runoff calculations
included in this report include the future expansion of the building. Please be clear
about this in the narrative and on your drainage map.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Page 6 of 11
08/08/2016: Drainage Report – Please note that the entire site needs to be treated
with some level of water quality feature. Generally this is 50% treated through
STANDARD water quality and 50% through an LID SYSTEM. You will need to
provide an exhibit of this site showing how you meet this requirement. (Standard
Water Quality requirements per the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual are: fifty
percent of the site runoff is required to be treated using the standard water quality
treatment as described in the Fort Collins Stormwater Manual, Volume 3-Best
Management Practices (BMPs).
(http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-form
s-guidelines-regulations/stormwater-criteria) Extended detention is the usual
method selected for water quality treatment; however the use of any of the BMPs is
encouraged.)
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Drainage Report - Please note that the LID criteria have been updated
since your conceptual review. Overall, stormwater quality requirements are as
follows: Enhanced (or LID) Water Quality requirements per the Fort Collins
Stormwater Criteria Manual are: Low Impact Development (LID) requirements are
required on all new or redeveloping property which includes sites required to be
brought into compliance with the Land Use Code. These require a higher degree of
water quality treatment with one of the two following options:
a. 50% of the newly added or modified impervious area must be treated by LID
techniques and 25% of new paved areas must be pervious.
b. 75% of all newly added or modified impervious area must be treated by LID
techniques.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Drainage Report – The LID Table looks like it indicates that the pavers
run-on area is included in the total square footage of pavers. You can’t count the
run-on area as pavers area. However, the run-on area can and should be counted
toward the LID treated area onsite. Also, the LID table seems to indicate that the
future expansion area drains onto the pavers area, but this doesn’t look possible.
Please explain.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Drainage Report – Calculating Runoff – Please note that Table RO-3
and runoff coefficient equations based on soil type is an Urban Drainage criteria, not
Fort Collins. Please simply utilize the runoff coefficients stated in our criteria manual
in Table RO-11.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Drainage Report – the Modified FAA spreadsheet page indicates that
you’re using Larimer County IDF curves. Please correct this text and ensure that
you’re using City of Fort Collins rainfall data.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for all onsite drainage facilities
will be included as part of the Development Agreement. More information and links
can be found at:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/what-we-do/stormwater/stormwater-quality/low-impac
t-development
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Page 7 of 11
08/08/2016: UPDATED FEES: The 2016 city wide Stormwater development fee
(PIF) is $8,217/acre for new impervious area over 350 square feet and there is a
$1,045/acre of site review fee. No fee is charged for existing impervious area.
These fees are to be paid at the time each building permit is issued. Information on
fees can be found at:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investment-de
velopment-fees or contact Jean Pakech at 221-6375 for questions on fees. There is
also an erosion control escrow required before the Development Construction
permit is issued. The amount of the escrow is determined by the design engineer,
and is based on the site disturbance area, cost of the measures, or a minimum
amount in accordance with the Fort Collins Stormwater Manual.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
08/09/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (based on redlined comments),
Erosion Control Report (based on redline comments), and an Escrow / Security
Calculation (based upon any changes to the erosion control plan) . If you need
clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions
please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
08/08/2016: Please change the name to "Beebe Christian School" on all sheets.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Topic: Construction Drawings
08/09/2016: Please change the name to "Beebe Christian School".
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: We did not see any benchmarks or benchmark statement shown on
the plans.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles
on the noted sheets.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas.
See redlines.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
08/09/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Topic: Landscape Plans
Page 8 of 11
08/08/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas.
See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Topic: Lighting Plan
08/08/2016: Please change the name to "Beebe Christian School".
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Topic: Site Plan
08/08/2016: Please include in the legal description the Metes & Bounds description
of the "portion" of Outlot A.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/09/2016: Additional sidewalk connections are recommended. Please see
redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Topic: Traffic Impact Study
08/09/2016: Operational analysis for school drop off and pick up will need to be
provided with next submittal.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/08/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit.
The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of
the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: General
08/08/2016: Utility Plan – For the proposed sewer service, you do not need to place
a new manhole on the main, simply callout to tap the main.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Utility Plan – For the proposed water service, please show the
proposed curb stop and water meter to scale and place them according to our
standard details.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Page 9 of 11
08/08/2016: Utility Plan – please note that a 2-inch fire service does not seem
adequate. You will need to verify this size.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Utility Plan – please plan to dedicate a 9’ utility easement behind the
ROW on the plat.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Utility Plan – the permeable pavers do not seem to be labeled
anywhere. These need to be labeled and the square footage should also be
indicated.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
08/08/2016: Utility Plan – The proposed relocation of the hydrant will also involve
street cuts – please indicate as necessary. Please also note on the plans that the
hydrant lateral will need to be abandoned at the main. Any abandonment procedures
should be coordinated with Water Field Operations and they can be contacted at
(970) 221-6700. Please add this note to the plans. Also, street cuts should be
shown here too.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Topic: Site Plan
08/08/2016: Site Plan – Please also include the future expansion areas for the
building and parking lot in the Land Use Table.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/08/2016
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ryan Boehle, 970-416-2401, rboehle@fcgov.com
Topic: General
The property is located in the E (employment district). Maximum building height shall
be no taller than 4 stories.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
To establish "build-to" lines, buildings shall be located and designed to align or
approximately align with any previously established building/sidewalk relationships
that are consistent with this standard. Buildings shall be located no more than fifteen
(15) feet from the right-of-way of an adjoining street if the street is smaller than a full
arterial or has on-street parking.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
All developments shall submit a landscape and tree protection plan. All
developments shall establish groves and belts of trees along all city streets, in and
around parking lots, and in all landscape areas that are located within fifty (50) feet
of any building or structure in order to establish at least a partial urban tree canopy
as per LUC 3.2.1. An interim landscape plan will need to be provided for the
expansion area.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
This PDP should include both proposed uses and identify area of expansion, and a
note should be included saying a minor amendment is required for the architecture,
and landscape changes made on the expansion area .
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Schools/places of worship must provide 6 bicycle parking spaces as per 3.2.2 (D)
(4). The bike rack on the site only shows 4 spaces, which needs to be increased to
accommodate the additional spaces required.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/09/2016
Page 10 of 11
The minimum amount of parking spaces required is 19 ( 1 space per 1000 square
feet) as per 3.2.2 (K)(h). The minimum parking spaces may change at the time of
the minor amendment for the place of worship or assembly, as stated in the
aforementioned code section .
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/10/2016
Site lighting needs to be provided as per 3.2.4 (C), a lighting plan, including
photometrics and fixture cut sheets.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/10/2016
Trash enclosure needed as per 3.2.5, The development shall provide adequate
sized, conveniently placed trash and recycling enclosure. Design needs to include a
separate walk in access separate to the main access.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/10/2016
3.5.1(I)(6) All mechanical equipment, meters, conduit, vents and RTU’s shall be
screened from public view both from above and below by integrating it into the
building and roof design.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/10/2016
All parking stall dimensions shall meet the requirements as per 3.2.2 (L) .
Dimensions start at 19’X9’, and will there be a designated pick up and drop off area
planned for the development.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/10/2016
The minimum amount of handicap parking for the development is 1 space as per
3.2.2 (K)(5) and regardless of handicap spaces provided, at least one space shall
be designated van accessible and must be a minimum of eight feet wide and have
an eight foot access aisle.
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 08/10/2016
Page 11 of 11