Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROSPECT STATION II - PDP - PDP150021 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY (3)DELICH Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 ASSOCIATES the current morning and afternoon peak hour operation of the Prospect/Tamasag- Driveway intersection. The Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection currently meets the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards during the morning and afternoon peak hours with existing control and geometry. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. At the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection, the calculated delay for the northbound approach is commensurate with level of service E in the morning and afternoon peak hours. A description of level of service for unsignalized intersection from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual is provided in Appendix C. Table 4-3 (revised per staff comments regarding type of intersection) showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) is also provided in Appendix C. The Prospect Station II site is in an area termed “mixed use districts.” In areas termed “mixed use districts,” acceptable operation at unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service F for any approach leg for an arterial/arterial, arterial/collector and arterial/local intersections. In such areas, it is expected that there would be substantial delays to the minor street movements at unsignalized intersections during the peak hours. This is considered to be normal in urban areas. At unsignalized collector/local intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service C for any approach leg. Figure 4 shows the site plan for the Prospect Station II. Prospect Station II is a 36 dwelling unit apartment building. Currently the site is occupied by the Griffin Building. The Griffin Building will be razed with Prospect Station II development. Access to the site will be via an access to/from Tamasag Drive. Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. Apartment (Code 220) contain in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, ITE was used to estimate the trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected use at a site. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from origin to destination. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. The trip generation of the Prospect Station II development resulted in 240 daily trip ends; 21 morning peak hour trip ends; and 22 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for Prospect Station II development and is shown in Figure 5. Figure 6 shows the site generated peak hour traffic assignment of the Prospect Station II development. Figure 7 shows the short range (2018) background morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection. Background traffic volume forecasts for the short range (2018) future were obtained by reviewing traffic studies for other developments in this area and reviewing historic counts in the area. Traffic volumes at the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection were increased at a rate of 2.0 percent per year. Table 3 shows the short range (2018) background morning and afternoon peak hour operation at the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D. The Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards during the morning and afternoon peak hours with the existing control and geometry in the short range (2018) future. At the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection, the calculated delay for the northbound approach is commensurate with level of service E in the morning and afternoon peak hours. DELICH Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 ASSOCIATES Figure 8 shows the short range (2018) total morning and afternoon peak hour traffic at the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection. Table 4 shows the short range (2018) total morning and afternoon peak hour operation at the Prospect/Tamasag- Driveway intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix E. The Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards during the morning and afternoon peak hours with the existing control and geometry. At the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection, the calculated delay for the northbound approach is commensurate with level of service F in the morning and afternoon peak hours. The recommended short range (2018) geometry is shown in Figure 9. This is the existing geometry at the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection. An eastbound right- turn lane is not required based on Figure 8-4 in LCUASS. According to Figure 8-1 in LCUASS, left-turn lanes are required on all arterial streets. This segment of Prospect Road has a two-way left-turn lane. The Prospect Station II site is in an area within which the City requires pedestrian and bicycle level of service evaluations. Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Prospect Station II site. The Prospect Station II site is located within an area termed as “pedestrian district,” which sets the pedestrian level of service threshold at LOS A for all measured categories, except for Street Crossing at LOS B. There are three destination areas within 1320 feet of the proposed development at Prospect Station II: 1) the residential/hotel area to the west, 2) the residential area and Colorado State University to the north, and 3) the commercial area and the Mason Trail to the east. This development will build sidewalks along the site frontage. Appendix F contains a Pedestrian LOS Worksheet. Based upon Fort Collins Bicycle LOS criteria, there are two destinations within 1320 feet of the Prospect Station II site: Mason Trail to the east and Colorado State University to the north. Appendix F contains a Bicycle LOS Worksheet. The bicycle level of service will be met. Currently, this area is served by the Max. The nearest stop is north of Prospect Road. It is concluded that, with development of Prospect Station II, the future level of service at the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection will be acceptable. Additional auxiliary lanes are not required at the Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway intersection. Acceptable level of service is achieved for alternative transportation modes. SCALE: 1"=500' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Lake Street Prospect Road College Avenue Center Avenue Remington Street Bay Road Tamasag Drive Mason Trail Prospect Station II CURRENT GEOMETRY Figure 2 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Tamasag Drive Prospect Road - Denotes Lane RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Tamasag Drive Prospect Road Driveway 3/2 0/0 6/8 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1163/1233 1/4 0/0 891/1385 5/10 AM/PM DELICH Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 ASSOCIATES TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway (stop sign) EB LT A A WB LT A A NB LT/T/RT B B SB LT/T/RT B B TABLE 2 Trip Generation Code Use Size AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out 220 Apartment 36 Dwelling Units 6.65 240 Eq. 4 Eq. 17 Eq. 14 Eq. 8 SITE PLAN Figure 4 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 5 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Tamasag Drive Prospect Road Driveway 40% 60% SITE SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Tamasag Drive Prospect Road Driveway 7/3 10/5 2/6 2/8 AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2018) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Tamasag Drive Prospect Road Driveway 3/2 0/0 6/8 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1234/1308 1/4 0/0 946/1470 5/10 AM/PM DELICH Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 ASSOCIATES TABLE 3 Short Range (2018) Background Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway (stop sign) EB LT A A WB LT A A NB LT/T/RT B B SB LT/T/RT B B TABLE 4 Short Range (2018) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway (stop sign) EB LT A A WB LT A A NB LT/T/RT B B SB LT/T/RT B B SHORT RANGE (2018) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Tamasag Drive Prospect Road Driveway 10/5 0/0 16/13 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1234/1308 3/10 0/0 946/1470 7/18 AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2018) GEOMETRY Figure 9 DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Tamasag Drive Prospect Road - Denotes Lane APPENDIX A 1 2 3 4 5 APPENDIX B 6 DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 10/27/15 Observer: Sue Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: Prospect/Tamasag-Driveway S = straight L = left turn Time Northbound: Tamasag Southbound: Driveway Total Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total Total Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All 7:30 201 3 000 0 3 0 272 1 273 2 221 0 223 496 499 7:45 002 2 000 0 2 0 339 0 339 1 254 0 255 594 596 8:00 001 1 000 0 1 0 272 0 272 1 213 0 214 486 487 8:15 102 3 000 0 3 0 280 0 280 1 203 0 204 484 487 7:30-8:30 3 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 1163 1 1164 5 891 0 896 2060 2069 PHF 0.38 n/a 0.75 0.75 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.75 n/a 0.86 0.25 0.86 0.63 0.88 n/a 0.88 0.87 0.87 4:30 001 1 000 0 1 0 267 1 268 2 315 0 317 585 586 4:45 103 4 000 0 4 0 332 2 334 5 376 0 381 715 719 5:00 102 3 000 0 3 0 333 0 333 1 337 0 338 671 674 5:15 002 2 000 0 2 0 301 1 302 2 357 0 359 661 663 4:30-5:30 2 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 1233 4 1237 10 1385 0 1395 2632 2642 PHF 0.5 n/a 0.67 0.63 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.63 n/a 0.93 0.5 0.93 0.5 0.92 n/a 0.92 0.92 0.92 7 APPENDIX C 8 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect recent am 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 1163 1 5 891 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1337 1 6 1024 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1024 0 0 1338 0 0 1861 2373 669 1704 2374 512 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1337 1337 - 1036 1036 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 524 1036 - 668 1338 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 674 - - 511 - - 45 34 400 59 34 507 Stage 1 - - - - - - 162 220 - 248 307 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 504 307 - 414 220 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 674 - - 511 - - 45 34 400 57 34 507 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 45 34 - 57 34 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 162 220 - 248 303 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 498 303 - 407 220 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 41.1 0 HCM LOS E A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 110 674 - - 511 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.094 - - - 0.011 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 41.1 0 - - 12.1 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS E A - - B - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0 - - - 9 Lanes and Geometrics 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect recent am 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.905 Flt Protected 0.950 0.985 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1660 0 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.985 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1660 0 0 1863 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 734 929 709 546 Travel Time (s) 16.7 21.1 16.1 12.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other 10 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect recent pm 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 1233 4 10 1385 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1340 4 11 1505 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1505 0 0 1345 0 0 2116 2869 672 2197 2872 753 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1342 1342 - 1527 1527 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 774 1527 - 670 1345 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 441 - - 508 - - 29 16 398 25 16 352 Stage 1 - - - - - - 160 219 - 123 178 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 357 178 - 413 218 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 441 - - 508 - - 29 16 398 24 16 352 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 29 16 - 24 16 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 160 219 - 123 174 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 349 174 - 404 218 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 40.6 0 HCM LOS E A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 112 441 - - 508 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 - - - 0.021 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 40.6 0 - - 12.2 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS E A - - B - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - - 11 Lanes and Geometrics 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect recent pm 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.890 Flt Protected 0.950 0.991 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1643 0 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.991 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1643 0 0 1863 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 734 929 709 546 Travel Time (s) 16.7 21.1 16.1 12.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other 12 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A < 10 B > 10 and < 15 C > 15 and < 25 D > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and < 50 F > 50 13 Table 4-3 Fort Collins (GMA and City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Intersection type Land Use (from structure plan) Commercial corridors Other corridors within: Mixed use districts Low density mixed use residential All other areas Signalized intersections (overall) D E* D D Any Leg E E D E Any Movement E E D E Stop sign control (arterial/arterial, arterial/collector or local- any approach leg) N/A F** F** E Stop sign control (collector/local--any approach leg) N/A C C C * mitigating measures required ** considered normal in an urban environment 14 APPENDIX D 15 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short background am 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 1234 1 5 946 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1418 1 6 1087 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1087 0 0 1420 0 0 1974 2518 710 1808 2519 544 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1419 1419 - 1099 1099 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 555 1099 - 709 1420 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 638 - - 475 - - 37 28 376 49 28 483 Stage 1 - - - - - - 144 201 - 227 287 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 484 287 - 391 201 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 638 - - 475 - - 37 28 376 48 28 483 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 37 28 - 48 28 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 144 201 - 227 283 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 283 - 384 201 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 48.5 0 HCM LOS E A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 93 638 - - 475 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.111 - - - 0.012 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 48.5 0 - - 12.7 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS E A - - B - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - - 16 Lanes and Geometrics 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short background am 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.905 Flt Protected 0.950 0.985 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1660 0 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.985 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1660 0 0 1863 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 734 929 709 546 Travel Time (s) 16.7 21.1 16.1 12.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other 17 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short background pm 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 1308 4 10 1470 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1422 4 11 1598 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1598 0 0 1426 0 0 2245 3044 713 2331 3046 799 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1424 1424 - 1620 1620 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 821 1620 - 711 1426 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 406 - - 473 - - 23 12 374 20 12 328 Stage 1 - - - - - - 143 200 - 107 160 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 335 160 - 390 199 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 406 - - 473 - - 23 12 374 19 12 328 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 23 12 - 19 12 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 143 200 - 107 156 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 327 156 - 381 199 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 49.3 0 HCM LOS E A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 92 406 - - 473 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.118 - - - 0.023 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 49.3 0 - - 12.8 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS E A - - B - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - - 18 Lanes and Geometrics 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short background pm 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.890 Flt Protected 0.950 0.991 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1643 0 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.991 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1643 0 0 1863 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 734 929 709 546 Travel Time (s) 16.7 21.1 16.1 12.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other 19 APPENDIX E 20 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short total am 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 1234 3 7 946 0 10 0 16 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1418 3 8 1087 0 11 0 18 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1087 0 0 1422 0 0 1980 2523 711 1812 2525 544 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1420 1420 - 1103 1103 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 560 1103 - 709 1422 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 638 - - 475 - - 37 27 375 49 27 483 Stage 1 - - - - - - 143 201 - 225 285 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 480 285 - 391 200 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 638 - - 475 - - 37 27 375 46 27 483 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 37 27 - 46 27 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 143 201 - 225 280 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 472 280 - 372 200 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 71 0 HCM LOS F A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 83 638 - - 475 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.36 - - - 0.017 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 71 0 - - 12.7 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS F A - - B - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 0 - - 0.1 - - - 21 Lanes and Geometrics 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short total am 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.916 Flt Protected 0.950 0.981 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1674 0 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.981 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 3539 0 1770 3539 0 0 1674 0 0 1863 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 734 929 709 546 Travel Time (s) 16.7 21.1 16.1 12.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other 22 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short total pm 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 1308 10 18 1470 0 5 0 13 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1422 11 20 1598 0 5 0 14 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1598 0 0 1433 0 0 2265 3064 716 2348 3070 799 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1427 1427 - 1637 1637 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 838 1637 - 711 1433 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 406 - - 470 - - 22 12 373 19 12 328 Stage 1 - - - - - - 142 199 - 105 157 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 327 157 - 390 198 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 406 - - 470 - - 21 11 373 18 11 328 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 21 11 - 18 11 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 142 199 - 105 150 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 313 150 - 375 198 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 81.1 0 HCM LOS F A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 66 406 - - 470 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.296 - - - 0.042 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 81.1 0 - - 13 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS F A - - B - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 0 - - 0.1 - - - 23 Lanes and Geometrics 3: Tamasag/Driveway & Prospect short total pm 10/30/2015 Baseline Synchro 9 Light Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.999 0.901 Flt Protected 0.950 0.987 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 3536 0 1770 3539 0 0 1657 0 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.987 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 3536 0 1770 3539 0 0 1657 0 0 1863 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 734 929 709 546 Travel Time (s) 16.7 21.1 16.1 12.4 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other 24 APPENDIX F 25 SCALE: 1"=500' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Lake Street Prospect Road College Avenue Center Avenue Remington Street Bay Road Tamasag Drive Mason Trail Prospect Station II 27 Pedestrian LOS Worksheet Project Location Classification: Pedestrian District Description of Applicable Destination Area Within 1320’ Destination Area Classification Level of Service (minimum based on project location classification) Directness Continuity Street Crossings Visual Interest & Amenities Security Neighborhood to the west Residential Minimum A A B A A 1 Actual A A A A A Proposed A A A A A Neighborhood and CSU to the north Residential/ Institutional Minimum A A B A A 2 Actual A A B A A Proposed A A B A A Commercial area to the east Institutional Minimum A A B A A 3 Actual A A A A A Proposed A A A A A Minimum 4 Actual Proposed Minimum 5 Actual Proposed Minimum 6 Actual Proposed Minimum 7 Actual Proposed Minimum 8 Actual Proposed Minimum 9 Actual Proposed Minimum 10 Actual Proposed 29 SCALE: 1"=500' BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA DELICH ASSOCIATES Prospect Station II TIS, November 2015 Lake Street Prospect Road College Avenue Center Avenue Remington Street Bay Road Tamasag Drive Mason Trail Prospect Station II 26 Bicycle LOS Worksheet Level of Service – Connectivity Minimum Actual Proposed Base Connectivity: C B B Specific connections to priority sites: Description of Applicable Destination Area Within 1320’ Destination Area Classification 1 Mason Trail Recreational B A A Colorado State 2 University Institutional A A A 3 4 28