HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROSPECT STATION II - PDP - PDP150021 - CORRESPONDENCE - (4)Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
November 20, 2015
Cathy Mathis
TB Group
444 Mountain Ave
Fort Collins, CO 80513
RE: Prospect Station II, PDP150021, Round Number 1
Comment Summary:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Meaghan Overton, , moverton@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
11/13/2015: What is the pitch on the roof of the building? LUC 3.10.5(B) requires, to
the maximum extent feasible, a minimum pitch of 6:12 for gable and hipped roofs;
4:12 for hipped roofs alone.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: The currently proposed articulation of the building does help divide the
long (approx. 220 ft) facade of the proposed project; however, a more varied
articulation/offset floor plan of one or more sections of the building could significantly
improve the pedestrian environment, provide additional resident amenity space, and
add visual interest. Plazas or gathering places are required in LUC 4.27(D)(7)(b)(1),
and the articulation of facades and walls is addressed in LUC 3.8.30(F)(6).
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Topic: General
11/13/2015: How did you measure the distance between the project and Lilac Park?
LUC 4.27(D)(7) specifies that the distance to a park, central feature, or gathering
place shall be measured along street frontage without crossing an arterial street. It
appears, using this measurement requirement, that Lilac Park is more than the
required 1,320 feet away from the building.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: Please ensure that you are providing adequate space for trash and
recycling enclosures. Adequate size is estimated at 100 square feet for the first 10
units and 5 square feet for each additional unit. The “Trash and Recycling
Enclosures – Design Considerations” referenced in LUC 3.2.5(C) can be found
here: http://www.fcgov.com/recycling/pdf/enclosure-guidelines0804.pdf.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for
your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may
contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at
970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com.
Page 1 of 12
11/13/2015: As described in LUC 4.27(D)(7)(b)(1), the required park, central feature,
or gathering space on a site of less than 2 acres in gross area must be a minimum
of 6% of the gross site area.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Topic: Landscape Plans
11/13/2015: LUC 3.2.1(D)(1)(c) requires that 50% of all tree plantings be canopy
shade trees. The landscape plan submitted does not appear to meet this
requirement.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: The landscape plan shows two existing trees on the northwest corner
of the site that are marked for removal (trees #33 and #34). Will these trees be
removed? If so, please remove them from the landscape plan.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: At least 6% of the interior space of the parking lot must be devoted to
landscaping according to LUC 3.2.2(M)(1). Please provide a calculation of the
interior parking lot space that is devoted to landscaping. In addition, 1 canopy shade
tree per 150 square feet of internal landscaped area is required in LUC 3.2.1(E)(b)
for parking lot landscaping.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: If feasible, the three mature pine trees on the western edge of the site
(#35, 36, and 37 on the landscape plan) should be preserved as described in LUC
3.2.1(F) as these trees are some of the largest on the site, and provide screening
between the adjacent building and the site. The space required to preserve these
trees could be used as resident amenity space, thereby satifying the requirements
of LUC 4.27(D)(7).
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Topic: Lighting Plan
11/13/2015: LUC 3.2.4(D)(8) states that light levels measured 20 feet beyond the
property line of the site shall not exceed 0.1 foot-candle as a result of the on-site
lighting. On the northeast corner of the site, it appears that the lighting from the
fixture labeled GG2(E) will project more than 0.1 foot-candles at 20 feet beyond the
property line.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Topic: Modification of Standard
11/13/2015: The submitted request for a Modification of Standards relies on a
justification that the plan promotes the general purpose of the standard equally well
or better than a plan that complies with the standard and states that allowing this
modification would be "nominal and inconsequential when considered from the
perspective of the entire development plan." Please provide additional information to
support this justification. In particular, include information about the percentage of
secondary vs. primary uses in the Employment Zone area south of Prospect Road
and West of College Avenue as defined in LUC 4.27, as well as an estimate of the
current proposal's contribution to the percentage of secondary uses in the
Employment Zone area. Do not include CSU property in your justification, as it does
not have a City zoning designation.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Topic: Site Plan
Page 2 of 12
11/13/2015: Does the project provide pedestrian seating and lighting along Prospect
Rd. as required in Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.10.4(A)? Please include these
elements in your plans.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: LUC 3.10.3(C) requires outdoor spaces (courtyards, plazas, decks, and
similar) “to the extent reasonably feasible.” The project does provide decks for some
units, but does not appear to have any other outdoor public spaces with the
exception of the tree lawn. The proposed project has 36 units, with 54 bedrooms.
What amenity space is provided for residents to barbeque, sit outdoors, etc.?
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: Bike Parking: The project meets bike parking requirements for the
number of bike spaces. However, LUC 3.2.2(C)(4)(b) specifies that 60% of the
provided bicycle parking must be “enclosed.” Enclosed is defined in LUC 5.1 (in
part) as “secure, lighted and protected from the weather.” The site plan identifies
enclosed bicycle parking in the breezeways of the building. Where will this enclosed
parking be provided, and how will it be secured, lighted, and protected from the
weather?
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: Walkways: LUC 3.2.2(C)(5) requires walkways that “directly and
continuously connect areas or points of pedestrian origin and destination,” and are a
minimum of 6 feet in width between building entries and sidewalks. The site plan
appears to show walkways of 4 feet in width.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
11/13/2015: The planning objectives state that, “It is anticipated that reciprocal
access and parking agreements will be negotiated.” Please note such
arrangements and associated easements on the site plan. Particularly note the 11
spaces on the site that will be reserved for Prospect Station I in your parking counts.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Topic: Traffic Impact Study
11/13/2015: The project appears to meet the design requirements and
recommendations of the adopted Prospect Corridor Design. Pending the results of
the Traffic Impact Study, please note that additional improvements may be required
off-site as explained in LUC 3.2.2(A) to ensure safe, efficient movement for all
modes of travel.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/13/2015
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com
Topic: General
11/18/2015: The 30' offsite Access, Emergency Access, Utility and Drainage
easements are not being shown on the plat provided. These easements were
reserved with the vacation of Tamasag Drive. Please verify location
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
11/18/2015: The 10' sidewalk/shared path ramp at the driveway to the north will
need to be reconstructed so that the sidewalk transitions further south to line up with
the receiving ramp to the east. See redlines. Refer to LCUASS drawing 707.1 for a
Type III driveway detail.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
11/18/2015: Label all widths of easements. See redlines.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
Page 3 of 12
11/18/2015: Please provide a legend to the Utility Plan.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
11/18/2015: Please label all water main sizes and manhole locations.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
Topic: Plat
11/18/2015: Add the following note to the Plat: There shall be no private conditions,
covenanctsor restrictions that prohibit or limit the installation of resource conserving
equipment or landscaping that are allowed by sections 12-120 - 12-122 of the City
Code.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
11/18/2015: The 30' access, emergency access, Utility and Drainage easements
were reserved with the vacation of Tamasag Drive. Please show these easements
on the plat.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
11/18/2015: Are the easements that are being vacated by separate documents to
remove the enitre easement, which extend offsite, south of the property? If not, the
easements can be vacated through the replat.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
11/18/2015: There is a portion of the 15' Utility Easement to the north and the 18'
Utility & Drainage easement to the east that overlap. Please verify if you are wanting
this area as a drainage easement. See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
11/20/2015:
Confirm that the location of all the trees just off site along the north boundary are
accurately surveyed and located on the plan. It’s critical that these trees be
accurately located so the evaluation of construction impact to them can be correctly
assessed.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
Tree number 21 is a 24 inch diameter blue spruce. It is branched to the ground and
has surface roots that extend to the north. Move the parking lot peninsula located to
the east of this tree to align with the spruce and explore making it wider. This will
help protect lower branches and the shallow root system of this prominent tree. At
the current location the peninsula has pine branches extending over it that may limit
having a tree planted at that location.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
It appears that existing tree number 31 may be able to be retained. This tree is an 18
inch diameter Ponderosa Pine. Evaluate how the sidewalk and drainage shown by
this tree need to be modified so this tree can be retained.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
Page 4 of 12
11/20/2015:
Existing tree number 11 should be shown to be transplanted. This tree is a 9 inch
Austrian Pine. It appears it could be transplanted into the landscape area between
the building and the sidewalk. This would provide a prominent conifer tree is this
zone to help offset the loss of tree number 31 which is a 19 inch spruce.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
Existing trees 34 and 35 appear to be kept in place? Evaluate and confirm is this is
the case and then adjust the existing tree inventory table.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
On sheet LS 2 list the existing tree number by each of the existing trees shown to be
retained.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
Explore retaining exiting trees 1, 2 and 3 which are Spring Snow Crabapples by
attaching or repositioning the sidewalk. This evaluation should also evaluate any
grade changes that would occur for retaining these trees. As an alternative choice
evaluate transplanting these trees to the landscape area between the building and
sidewalk. Feasibility of transplanting should include checking underground utilities
and evaluation by a qualified tree transplanting contractor. The evaluation of retaining
these trees by attaching the walk should be evaluated at an onsite meeting with City
staff from Forestry and Engineering and the Project Planner. Set an onsite meeting
with these City staff members to evaluate.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
Use the new landscape, tree protection and street tree notes on the landscape plan.
These notes are available from the City Planner or City Forester. Add this additional
note to the tree protection notes.
Pruning of any off-site trees that have canopy that extends over the project shall only
occur based on an evaluation and recommendation of a private ISA certified arborist
and with the approval of the adjacent property owner or their designated
representative. Tree pruning shall be by a business that holds a current City of Fort
Collins Arborist License.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
In addition to tree number 28 which is a Washington Hawthorn also show tree
number 27 which is also a Washington Hawthorn to transplant. Contact a qualified
tree transplanting contractor to evaluate feasibility of transplanting tree number 28
and 27 because of how close they are to the building. Transplanting these trees
after the building is demolished may be necessary. Provide the report by the tree
transplanting contractor to the City Forester.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
Show locations on the landscape plan sheet LS 3 of all transplanted trees with their
existing tree number.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
Page 5 of 12
11/20/2015:
Existing Tree Inventory Table:
Make adjustments to the table for those trees to be transplanted and if tree number
33 and 34 will be retained. If additional trees are retained as presented in other
comments also edit the table to reflect this. Clearly identify trees to be transplanted
with only the word transplant.
Add a column to the Existing tree inventory table with the heading Reason for
Removal. List the reason for removal for each tree to be removed. Reasons for
removal could be abbreviated with a key at the bottom of the table.
At the bottom of the table total required mitigation trees and also list the number of
mitigation trees provided.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
Since Lindens do not do very well on arterial streets change the street tree species
to either Shumard Oak or Chinquapin Oak.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
Move the proposed Japanese tree Lilac further away to west from exiting tree
number 21 which is the 24 inch diameter Blue Spruce.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
In the plant list record the percentage of each tree used and check that it meets the
Minimum Species Diversity Standard in LUC 3.2.1 D 3.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
11/20/2015:
If there are any City Street lights show location and place trees to meet the
separation standard.
Canopy shade tree 40 feet from lights
Ornamental trees 15 feet from lights
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
Department: Historical Preservation
Contact: Maren Bzdek, , mbzdek@fcgov.com
Topic: General
11/17/2015: The existing building at 303 West Prospect is not old enough to require
historic review, but it has been surveyed for historic significance as part of an
inventory of post-WWII architecture in Fort Collins. Because the building is
associated with the historically significant Gasamat company, and because the
building itself is well-designed and a significant representation of its type and era,
staff respectfully requests that the applicant consider a documentation process to
preserve knowledge and information about the building prior to demolition. Measured
drawings of the exterior and interior and a set of photographs of the building would
be an appropriate way to recognize the contributions and significance of site to Fort
Collins history before the site is redeveloped.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Page 6 of 12
11/17/2015: Please schedule a pre-submittal meeting for this project. Pre-Submittal
meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the
new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the
adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in
the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new
commercial or multi-family projects should call 416-2341 to schedule a
pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor
plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square
footage and type of construction being proposed.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as
amended:
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the
fcgov.com/building web page to view them.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use: Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC
residential chapter.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: City of Fort Collins IBC amendments require a full NFPA-13 sprinkler
system in multifamily units.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: All windows above the 1st floor require minimum sill height of 24".
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: Building code and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide
accessible units. This project has 36 units and will need to achieve at least 18
points.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: Exterior walls and roof must meet a STC (sound resistance) rating of
40 min. if building located within 1000ft of train tracks.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-224-6189, slorson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Page 7 of 12
11/20/2015: GIS
1. Addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final
approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City.
2. Projects with three or more tenant units require the Unit Level Addressing form
to be completed and submitted to the GIS Department once plans have met final
approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. This can
occur anytime during construction, but before any utilities or address signs are
installed. All addressing will be determined by the GIS Department and submitted to
Poudre Fire Authority, USPS, Building Services, and Fort Collins Utilities. Failure to
contact GIS and determining addresses through other means may result in address
changes.
The Unit Level Addressing form can be obtained by contacting the GIS office at
gis@fcgov.com or (970) 416-2483.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Coy Althoff, , CAlthoff@fcgov.com
Topic: General
11/17/2015: Existing 3-Phase primary electrical service is available to this proposed
facility. (Currently feeding the Griffin Office Building.) The existing transformer is a
75kVA 120/208 3-Phase. If the electrical service needs to be re-located and or
modified then system modification and added kVA charges will apply.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the transformer
and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans.
Multi-family units shall be individually metered "ganged" together on one end of the
building preferably opposite side of where the gas meter cluster will be located.
Transformers shall be installed within 10' of a paved service and must have an 8'
Clarence on the front and a 3' clearance around the sides and back.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
11/17/2015: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at
221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use
our fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/17/2015
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Seth Lorson, 970-224-6189, slorson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
11/20/2015: Comcast
Comcast has service in the alley and would like to do joint trench with City Light and
Power. Developer will need to sign joint trench agreement with Light and Power.
- Don Kapperman
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/20/2015
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 9702246065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: Drainage Report
Page 8 of 12
11/09/2015: See redlined drainage report.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
Topic: General
4 (Grading Plan): LID - For both LID requirements, please provide an exhibit that
shows which basins/areas drain toward each requirement. An LID table is also
required to be included on the Drainage Plan that shows the LID techniques being
used on the site and the area treated by each. (These are required to be provided
prior to recommendation for hearing.)
- 25% Permeable Pavement requirement - what is the run-on ratio of the pavers
(ratio of area draining to pavers: paver area itself). The city will allow a maximum
run-on ratio of 3:1.
- 50% LID requirement - The drainage report states that Basins A, B, and C are
treated with the porous pavers, but basins B and C don't drain into/toward the
pavers. Please verify which areas drain into the pavers.
11/09/2015:
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
11/09/2015: The Grading Plan and the Drainage Report indicate that a Snout is
being proposed in lieu of providing WQCV at the site. WQCV needs to be provided
at the site because variance won't be supported. Please note that if you plan to
provide some LID features on the north side of the building, volume based LID (i.e.
bioretention cells) should not be placed in the 15-foot utility easement. (This is
required to be provided prior to recommendation for hearing.)
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
11/09/2015: How are you proposing to grade around the one existing tree along
Prospect that is supposed to remain in place? It looks like the grading plan is cutting
approximately 1 foot¿ in this area of the tree.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
11/09/2015: Please verify that the underdrain starting at the northwest corner of the
building and wrapping around the building to the southeast is intended to accept roof
drainage. If so, please make a note of this on the plans.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
11/09/2015: Contour and slope labels should be added to the plans.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
11/18/2015: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and
Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control
requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of
Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion
Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. As a result of the last phase's
construction, this phase will need to take proactive/additional steps to prevent
materials from being allowed to leave site, the Erosion Control Materials need to be
sumbitted with a section discussing how the Developer plans to ensure that the site
will not be discharging with this phase. Also as a result of the last phase 'Straw
Wattle' will not be accepatable with this project due to how tight this site is and the
likelihood of discharge along prospect. If you need clarification concerning this
section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or
email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
Topic: General
Page 9 of 12
11/18/2015:
Comment Number: Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
11/16/2015: No comments.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
Topic: Construction Drawings
11/16/2015: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January
1, 2015 all projects are required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the
following information in the EXACT format shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR
THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE
FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88
- X.XX’.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
11/16/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
11/16/2015: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas.
See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
Topic: Landscape Plans
11/16/2015: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
11/16/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
Topic: Lighting Plan
11/16/2015: No comments.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
Topic: Plat
11/16/2015: Please make changes to the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision
as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
Page 10 of 12
11/16/2015: Are there any Lienholders for this property? If so, please add a
signature block. If not, please add a note stating there are none, and include
response in written comments.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
11/16/2015: Please change “Engineering Department” in the Notice Of Other
Documents statement to “Clerk”. See redlines.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
11/16/2015: Please correct the reception number for the 25' Drainage & Utility
Easement to be vacated by separate document. It is for the vacation of Tamasag
Drive. See redlines.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
11/16/2015: Some or all of the easements can be vacated by Vacation Statement,
modified to fit this plat?
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
Topic: Site Plan
11/16/2015: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
11/16/2015: Please remove the comma from the legal description. See redlines.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/16/2015
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
11/18/2015: Traffic impact study has been received, reviewed, and the conclusions
accepted.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
11/18/2015: The closure of the driveway and the addition of the 10 ft path is a big
improvement. The connection of the path to the existing walks on both east and
west side may need to be reviewed. On the east side, can it be more direct? On
the west side, can we built the path all the way to the property line, and still tie into
existing?
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
11/06/2015: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit.
The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of
the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/06/2015
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 9702246065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Page 11 of 12
11/09/2015: 2 (Demolition Plan): Please note that the water and sanitary sewer
services to be abandoned in Prospect Road will need to be abandoned at the main.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
11/09/2015: LS 2: The water meter is placed in a landscape island with a tree and
shrubs. Please make sure that there is 4’ separation from the edge of the meter
vault to any shrubs and 6’ separation from trees. Also, a note regarding
landscape/utility separation requirements should be added to the plans.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/09/2015
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avandeutekom@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
11/18/2015: Trash enclosures greater than 6 foot in height require a separate
building permit. If you bring the height down to 6 foot in height you don't need a
separate permit.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/18/2015
Page 12 of 12