The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutALTA VISTA WTF (903 BUCKINGHAM ST.) - PDP - PDP160004 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview April 29, 2016 Ken Bradtke Atlas Tower Holdings, LLC 4450 Arapahoe Ave. Suite 100 Boulder, CO 80303 RE: Alta Vista (903 Buckingham St) Wireless Telecommunication Facility, PDP160004, Round Number 2 Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com Topic: General 04/26/2016: Thank you for providing paint color samples. Of the color samples submitted, staff prefers "Big Chill" and "Oyster White". 02/09/2016: Will the proposed paint color match the color shown in the rendering? Please provide staff with a color sample for the silo color. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/09/2016 04/26/2016: Since this proposal is going through the development review process at the same time that Colorado Iron and Metal is trying to obtain vesting for their development plan, staff cannot proceed further with this submittal per Land Use Code section 2.1.4(A). If Colorado Iron and Metal installs their public infrastructure before their August lapse date, then this project will be able to proceed without providing that infrastructure. If Colorado Iron and Metal lapses, then this project would be responsible for installing the public infrastructure for 903 Buckingham St. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/26/2016 Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Sexton, 970-221-6501, ksexton@fcgov.com Topic: General Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com. Page 1 of 4 04/26/2016: When the project is submitted for its next round of review, a utility plan set with City Signature block, separate from the site plan set, will need to be submitted showing utility plans and public improvements. See LCUASS Appendix E for utility plan requirements. 02/08/2016: Please include grading/drainage/erosion control/construction details with this submittal (as a utility set with cover sheet, notes, signature block, etc.), or amend the approved FDP to include the wireless telecommunications facility. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/08/2016 04/26/2016: Easement is currently under review. 02/08/2016: The access and utility easement will need to be dedicated by separate document. More information on that process can be found here: http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/pdf/Easrowdedications2010.pdf Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/08/2016 Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Kimple, 970-416-2401, kkimple@fcgov.com Topic: General 04/26/2016: No comments Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/26/2016 Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review 02/11/2016: Tower must meet the adopted 100B mph nominal wind load. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/11/2016 Department: Light And Power Contact: Todd Vedder, 970-224-6152, tvedder@fcgov.com Topic: General 04/27/2016: A completed C-1 form will need to be filled out before an invoice can be sent to include contractors and meter types/quantities. Also please provide a separate one-line document that can be reviewed and filed with the C-1 form. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/27/2016 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: General Page 2 of 4 02/08/2016: There was discussion in the Conceptual Review Meeting for this project that was related to the approved plans for this parcel for Colorado Iron and Metal. I believe there were two options to move forward with site design that came out of that discussion. a. If the Wireless Telecommunication Facility is planned to be a part of that larger development plan for Colorado Iron and Metal, then we will need to see those plans with the appropriate revisions that show this telecommunications facility incorporated. Grading and drainage information would need to be updated accordingly. b. If the Wireless Telecommunication Facility is planned to be built on its own and the Colorado Iron and Metal plans are not going to move forward, then an entire new set of construction plans for this project will be required. This would include grading, drainage, erosion control plans as well as requirements set forth by the Engineering Department. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/08/2016 04/26/2016: The effective imperviousness has now been shown to be less than 1000 square feet. However, a drainage memo and grading plan still do need to be provided as a part of the plans. This comment was provided previously in the emailed redlines back to Caleb on 3/9/16. a. A drainage memo should include at a minimum: summary description of the project, existing ground conditions (ground covers, direction of flow) proposed ground conditions (areas of added imperviousness and overall effective imperviousness). Statement of compliance with the requirements of the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria (how you’re meeting the <1000 sf imperviousness requirement which allows this project to forego stormwater detention, water quality, and LID requirements) b. A grading plan should include at a minimum: existing topography, proposed contours at 1’ intervals, spot elevations, finished floor elevations for the equipment, indication if there are swales or flow channelization of any sort, slope arrows with percentages. c. Please contact Heather McDowell at (970) 224-6065 if you need further direction. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/26/2016 Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control 04/19/2016: No Comment from Erosion Control. Special care should be used in the disposal of the excavated material as there are beet tailings from the old beet factory. Otherwise this site; disturbs less than 10,000 sq. ft., is not in a sensitive area, and is not in a larger development under construction. Therefore, no submittal of erosion control material is needed at this time. However, the site still must be swept and maintained to prevent dirt, saw cuttings, concrete wash, trash & debris, landscape materials and other pollutants from entering the storm sewer at all times or BMPs will be required of the site. Also all silt fence should be removed once the project is stabilized. If you need; clarification concerning the erosion control section or if there are any questions, please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Easements Page 3 of 4 04/26/2016: The text on the sketch provided is too small to read. The legal descriptions will be reviewed when a better sketch is provided. We suggest that you provide a sketch for each easement, at a larger scale. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/26/2016 Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General 02/10/2016: The Silo needs to more clarification of the visual appearance. Needs to look more like a silo. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/10/2016 04/26/2016: Please provide samples of proposed colors for the silo Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/26/2016 04/26/2016: The silo still needs a top. Currently looks like an unfinished silo. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/26/2016 04/26/2016: Electrical plans are not necessary for PDP/FP. Please eliminate them from this set. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/26/2016 Page 4 of 4