Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE OVERLOOK - FDP - FDP160035 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - REVISIONS1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview June 20, 2016 Brent Cooper Ripley Design, Inc. 419 Canyon Ave Ste 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: The Overlook, PDP160011, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126 or jholland@fcgov.com. RESPONSES 8/16/16 PLANNING RESPONSE: Ripley Design Inc. CIVIL RESPONSE: Northern Engineering ARCHITECTURE RESPONSE: VFLA Architects LIGHTING RESPONSE: APS Inc. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 06/10/2016: There are still areas in the Utility Plans that show the parking lot corners/limits. Maybe the layer just needs to be turned off. Since the property will be sold to Stockover Investments by meets and bounds, we can just treat it as one parcel. 04/20/2016: The final lot configuration shown on the plat should be reflected on the Utility Plans. Currently the portion of the First National Bank property is notched out. RESPONSE: The referenced existing property corners and linework have been removed from the plans. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 2 06/10/2016: In addition to the access easement to the north, a letter of intent will be needed for the drainage easement prior to hearing. 04/20/2016: An offsite access easement is needed for the private road between the site and the First National Bank property to the north. A letter of intent prior to hearing is required. RESPONSE: A letter of intent for the access easement was provided prior to hearing. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 06/10/2016 06/10/2016: Why is a Private Parking Easement (Shaded on Plat) being dedicated over the detention pond? RESPONSE: Parking easements were removed to simplify plans. As it is a private agreement a part of the sale, it was decided that it was unnecessary on the plat. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 06/10/2016: Please refer to all private parking easements as "Private". These easements will not be dedicated to the City. RESPONSE: Parking easements were removed to simplify plans. As it is a private agreement a part of the sale, it was decided that it was unnecessary on the plat. 04/20/2016: The parking easement shown the plat should be removed. If a parking easement is desired, it will need to be a private easement between the two Lots and not dedicated to the City. RESPONSE: Parking easements were removed to simplify plans. As it is a private agreement a part of the sale, it was decided that it was unnecessary on the plat. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 06/09/2016: Please also include the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone and associated notes on sheets H2 and U2 of the utility plan set. 04/19/2016: The following notes should be added to all site, landscape, photometric and utility plans that show the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone: 1. Please see Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. 2. The Natural Habitat Buffer Zone is meant to be maintained in a native landscape. RESPONSE: Natural Habitat Buffer Zone is now included on the H2 and U2 of the utility plan set with above notes. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/09/2016 06/09/2016: Wing 2 currently encroaches into the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. In this case, a buffer that is an average of 50 feet from the ditch (rather than a straight 50 feet in all locations) may be more appropriate. For ease of maintenance and to ensure the buffer standards are met, I recommend 3 adjusting the NHBZ boundary to follow the edge of the southern parking lot and the shrub beds south of Wing 2, while excluding the building and building entrances. See redlines for an approximate boundary that could work. RESPONSE: The NHBZ has been adjusted to provide the same (or more) area as a straight 50’ offset. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: For the area to be graded off-site (within the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone, south of the property), please provide details on the native seed mix to be used. Temporary irrigation will be required to ensure that the seed mix establishes properly. This area will be subject to any development agreement provisions and inspections that are applicable to the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone, even though it is located off-site. RESPONSE: Grading no longer occurs off-site. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 06/09/2016: The quantity of plantings in the buffer zone appears to be adequate. I will review the detailed plan at the time of final compliance to ensure that all buffer zone standards have been met. 04/19/2016: Please provide detailed species information for all plantings in the buffer zone. Per the ECS, please include a diverse mix of native shrubs, trees and herbaceous species along the canal to enhance habitat quality, provide vegetative screening, and create variety in vertical structure along the canal. Mitigation trees for the two cottonwood trees that will be removed along the canal should be provided within the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. RESPONSE: More detail has been added to the landscape plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 06/09/2016: I will review the detailed planting plan at the time of final compliance. 04/19/2016: A detailed planting plan for the entire site, including seed mix species, will need to be provided. RESPONSE: More detail has been added to the landscape plans. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 06/09/2016: Given the need to address other priorities on the site (e.g., pedestrian safety), and given that there is no light spillage in close proximity to the ditch, I am comfortable with the amount of light spillage shown within the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. 04/19/2016: Given the proximity of the light fixtures in the southern parking lot to the buffer zone, please ensure that no light will spillage will occur within the buffer, per section 3.2.4(D)(6) of the LUC. RESPONSE: Noted. Department: Historic Preservation Contact: Maren Bzdek, 970-221-6206, mbzdek@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/01/2016 The property does not contain buildings 50 years old or older, and the proposed plans are unlikely to affect adjacent historic properties, if any.04/01/2016: 4 RESPONSE: Noted. Department: Internal Services Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/20/2016 Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting: Pre-Submittal meetings are required to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Overlook – project specific concerns: 1. Fire-sprinkler systems are required. A new code amendment effective in 5 2014 will require a full NFPA-13 sprinkler system and not allow a 13-R system. 2. All windows above the 1st floor require minimum sill height of 24” 3. Building code and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide accessible units. 4. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling. 5. Exterior walls and roof must meet a STC (sound resistance) rating of 40 min. if building located within 1000ft to train tracks. 6. Low-flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required. 7. Special combustion safety requirements for natural draft gas appliances. 8. Low VOC interior finishes. City of Fort Collins Building Services Plan Review 416-2341 RESPONSE: Noted Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 04/22/2016: Light and Power has 3 phase and single phase electric facilities in the area that can be utilized to serve the development. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investmen t-development-fees Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Modification charges will apply to relocate Light and Power's existing facilities. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Transformer locations will need to be coordinated with Light & Power. Transformer must be placed within 10 ft of a drivable surface for installation and maintenance purposes. The transformer must also have a front clearance of 10 ft and side/rear clearance of 3 ft minimum. Response: Transformer locations are shown on the utility plans. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Light & Power will need AutoCAD files of the approved site plan, 6 utility plans, and landscape drawings before design of the electric facilities will begin. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Commercial service information forms (C-1 forms) and a one line diagrams for the commercial meters will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. A link to the C- 1 form is below: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- forms-guidelines-regulations Response: This form will be provided at a future date. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Streetlight placement along JFK Pkwy will need to be coordinated with Light & Power. Shaded trees are required to maintain 40 feet of separation clearances and ornamental trees are required to maintain 15 feet of separation clearances from street lights. A link to the City of Fort Collins street lighting requirements can be found below: http://www.larimer.org/engineering/GMARdStds/Ch15_04_01_2007.pdf Response: Street lighting will be coordinated with Light and Power. Clearances with trees will be met. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Electric meter locations will need to be coordinated with Light and Power Engineering. Each residential unit will need to be individually metered. If you wish to gang the meters on one side of the building please place on the opposite side of the gas meters. The owner is responsible to provide and maintain the electrical service from the transformer to the meter bank. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/10/2016 Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Response: Acknowledged. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/13/2016 06/13/2016: TURNING EXHIBIT An AutoTurn exhibit is requested to ensure fire apparatus movement throughout the site. RESPONSE: A turning exhibits has been provided to Jim Lynxwiler via email. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/13/2016 06/13/2016: GRADE TRANSITION AT JFK Project team is asked to ensure the transition onto the property at JFK can be negotiated without difficulty or high-center for fire apparatus. RESPONSE: A grade transition exhibit has been provided to Jim Lynxwiler via email. 7 Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/13/2016 06/13/2016: HYDRANT PLACEMENT FOR FDC At this time it's unclear if the hydrant to the east at Shores Office Park Shores is physically assessable to this property or would qualify as an acceptable location for meeting the 100' limit to the FDC. The best solution appears to be relocating the hydrant 50' slightly to the NW of it's current location, add another hydrant on site, etc. RESPONSE: The FDC for Wing 2 was deemed unnecessary. The FDC at Wing 1 will accommodate both buildings. The fire hydrant was moved closer to the Wing 1 FDC. Department: Planning Services Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 6-15-2016 Provide a complete height review analysis narrative with justication that comprehensively responds to the height review criteria in LUC 3.5.1(G)(1) (a) and (b). A building height review analysis is required per the land use code criteria. With the resubmittal, please provide the analysis per the criteria and include cross sections and perspective modeling that illustrates the proposed building¿s relationship to the adjacent buildings to the east and also south. With the modelling, please include grade transitions, walls, fencing and significant plant material that contribute to transition and privacy. RESPONSE: Justification included with 6/22/16 submittal. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 6-15-2016 Landscape plans at PDP phase must show representative plant symbols for all shrub beds, indicating the type of plant and general character of the design at the time of hearing. Transition of ground elements for this proposal is a concern -- including proposed parking, grade tie-in, walls, fencing, etc. This must be addressed comprehensively with a combination of wood/masonry fencing, enhanced retaining wall materials that are residential in appearance, boulders, significant landscape material, and potentially oversized material at the time of planting. Staff needs detailed sections and details to illustrate how the transition can work since the some of the areas of the site are constrained. RESPONSE: Landscape plan has been developed to a more detailed level and shows all plant material. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Off-site trees along the ditch are shown as removed. Why are these trees being removed? RESPONSE: Trees are now proposed to remain since all grading now occurs on-site. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Landscape plan has several utility separation issues and trees on top of sidewalks. See redlines. RESPONSE: Adjusted. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 8 06/15/2016: On the site plan, add and label the water vault symbol shown in the parking lot stall located north of the building (shown on the civil set and landscape plan). Add transformers to the site and landscape plan. RESPONSE: Added and labeled. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Remove landscape note 12. Edit note 11 to say "property owner". RESPONSE: Note edited. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: See revision to planting bed just south of the trash enclosure. RESPONSE: Planting bed enlarged and tree shifted. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Provide a table on the landscape plan that confirms the parking lot interior and perimeter landscaping is in compliance with the minimum tree planting/interior landscape requirements. This also includes the SF minimums and: 3.2.1(E)(5)(b) Maximized Area of Shading. Landscaped islands shall be evenly distributed to the maximum extent feasible. At a minimum, trees shall be planted at a ratio of at least one (1) canopy shade tree per one hundred fifty (150) square feet of internal landscaped area with a landscaped surface of turf, ground cover perennials or mulched shrub plantings; 3.2.1(E)(5)(b) (c) Landscaped Islands. In addition to any pedestrian refuge areas, each landscaped island shall include one (1) or more canopy shade trees, be of length greater than eight (8) feet in its smallest dimension, include at least eighty (80) square feet of ground area per tree to allow for root aeration, and have raised concrete curbs. If the above cannot be met, show alternate locations and provide an alternative compliance narrative on the plans that shows how the minimum quantities are met. See round one redlines for PL interior boundaries. RESPONSE: An exhibit has been provided on sheet 9 showing the interior parking sf requirements are met. We will continue to work with staff through Final design to ensure required landscape is provided. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Per the round 1 redlines, provide a summary label for the surrounding properties and buildings noting the zoning, property owner, type of building, and surrounding building heights in stories. Make the outlines of the surrounding buildings a bit bolder to distinguish from the other context lines shown. RESPONSE: Labels added. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Add more detail to the fence, at a minimum a facia board which covers the seams at each post. Descibe the material/finish and proposed color. RESPONSE: Detail added. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Provide more information on the landscape plans regarding the sizes/calipers of the trees to be planted. Along the property line transition areas, staff shall make a recommendation that these areas receive significantly larger 9 trees than the code minimum in order to provide adequate transition per the code. RESPONSE: More information on tree sizing has been added, and the landscape plan indicates upsizing of all trees within 30’ of the areas adjacent to residential. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: On the shadow diagrams, overlay a red line and label the 21' shadow edge over shadow diagram #1 so that these can be compared. Overlay linework to show the property lines more clearly on all of the diagrams from a presentation perspective. The comparision needs to be crystal clear. RESPONSE: A red line has been added to the shadow study as requested. See attached updated sheets. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Provide material/pattern and color information for the landscape retaining walls. Staff recommends that landscape walls be a distinctive pattern such as an ashlar pattern since the standard running bond walls associated with commercial/retail/industrial developments have become ubiquitous. RESPONSE: Additional information about retaining walls has been added to sheet 2. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: On the site plan table, label the specific potential uses and GSF proposed for the commercial area in a "use" row on the table, from the uses specifically listed in the E district, not just in the parking data provided (see round one redline.) RESPONSE: Added. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: For the exterior porch lights, staff shall recommend that these be shielded to the maximum extent feasible from perimeter views. This could be a simple add-on shroud, like a three-sided box surrounding and offset from the light fixture or perhaps LED lights attached to the back of the porch railings. RESPONSE: The porch light is a full cut off fixture with a metal and glass shroud. It’s a low (10w) LED bulb. Its cutsheet is provided on the photometric sheet. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Label any uses proposed in the detention areas. RESPONSE: There are no proposed uses in the detention area, they will be planted in a native seed mix. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/18/2016 06/06/2016: Drainage Report: SWMM files have been reviewed – for the next submittal – please provide the SWMM model itself. This can be done at final. 04/18/2016: Drainage Report: a. Page 4 under the Four Step process you indicate that rain garden planter boxes are going to be provided as an LID system. Please show these on the LID exhibit. b. Page 5 references the prior drainage analysis for this property as the First National Bank 1st PUD Master Plan. I can¿t find the drainage analysis for that 10 project so pertinent excerpts from that report should be included in the Appendix of this report to show how you came up with the allowable release rate from this site. c. I can¿t tell exactly what the allowable or planned release rates are from the site. Please clarify. d. SWMM model files (input and output) should be included with the next submittal. e. WQCV calculations should be provided for each of the rain garden areas. Also, a summary table showing how you¿re meeting the LID ordinance requirements should also be included on the LID exhibit. f. Redlines have been provided on the pdf drainage report. I will email this to Stephanie. RESPONSE: As requested, SWMM model will be provided at final design. 04/18/2016: Drainage Report: a. Page 4 under the Four Step process you indicate that rain garden planter boxes are going to be provided as an LID system. Please show these on the LID exhibit. b. Page 5 references the prior drainage analysis for this property as the First National Bank 1st PUD Master Plan. I can¿t find the drainage analysis for that project so pertinent excerpts from that report should be included in the Appendix of this report to show how you came up with the allowable release rate from this site. c. I can¿t tell exactly what the allowable or planned release rates are from the site. Please clarify. d. SWMM model files (input and output) should be included with the next submittal. e. WQCV calculations should be provided for each of the rain garden areas. Also, a summary table showing how you¿re meeting the LID ordinance requirements should also be included on the LID exhibit. f. Redlines have been provided on the pdf drainage report. I will email this to Stephanie. RESPONSE: All above comments have been addressed in previous submittals. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/18/2016 06/06/2016: The response to this comment indicated that easements will be dedicated by time of final plat, however, please note, “Letters of Intent” will be required prior to hearing. These are required two items: 1) for the proposed offsite storm pipe you plan to put in and 2) for use of the offsite private storm pipes and detention ponds downstream of your site as these serve as part of your outfall. 04/18/2016: Plat: The storm pipe outfall for the site will need to be in a drainage easement. Since this easement is outside of the boundary of the plat it will need to be dedicated by separate document. We will also require that at ¿Letter of Intent¿ be submitted prior to hearing that basically shows that the property owner acknowledges your intent to dedicate an easement on their property and that they are going to work with you to grant said easement during final the design process. RESPONSE: Letters of intent for drainage easement were provided prior to hearing. 11 Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/18/2016 04/18/2016: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com RESPONSE: SWMP, Erosion Control Plan and Escrow was submitted with FDP. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. RESPONSE: Corrected Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 04/18/2016 06/16/2016: There are still some labels that do not match the plat. See redlines. 04/18/2016: Please label the easements as shown on the Plats. Do not combine easements. RESPONSE: Labels have been updated. Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: Please correct the title of sheet U2. See redlines. RESPONSE: Updated. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/18/2016 06/16/2016: We did not receive them. Please email them directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com 04/18/2016: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com RESPONSE: Monument records have been emailed to Jeff County. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: Please add bearings, distances, and/or curve data as marked. See redlines. RESPONSE: Revised. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: Please make the lot dimensions a larger text than the easement dimensions. See redlines. RESPONSE: Revised. 12 Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: All easements must be labeled & locatable. See redlines. RESPONSE: Revised. Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: Please add the areas of the dedicated right of ways. See redlines. RESPONSE: Revised Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: Please add a detail for the northeast corner of the property. See redlines. RESPONSE: Many of the easements in the northeast corner were removed for simplification. These easements do not affect the plat. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: Which monuments are you accepting at the 3 boundary corners with double monuments? See redlines. RESPONSE: Accepted monuments are listed on the plat. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/18/2016 06/16/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 04/18/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines. RESPONSE: Corrected. Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 06/16/2016 06/16/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. RESPONSE: Corrected. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 06/14/2016: Pedestrian connection to existing side walk needs to be made. (This is an off site connection) RESPONSE: Pedestrian connection to eastern property is now provided. A letter of intent was given from property owner. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Emma Belmont, 970-224-6197, ebelmont@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/14/2016 06/14/2016: Thank you for noting the bus stop shall be upgrade to meet current standards. Just to be clear what those are, this project will need to make the bus stop meet the Type 3 standards. Please see our design standards here: http://www.ridetransfort.com/img/site_specific/uploads/Final_Design_Standard s.pdf. These standards also require the developer to upgrade the shelter and other stop amenities to meet the new standard. You have the option of 13 purchasing the site amenities yourself, either through our vendor or through a different vendor that meet the standards outlined, or you can pay Transfort a fee to take care of that. I have estimates for the cost you would pay us and you can decide how to proceed. I'm sure you will have questions, so please do not hesitate to contact me. RESPONSE: Noted. Concrete pad has been designed to accommodate type 3 stop. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/18/2016 04/18/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com RESPONSE: Noted. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/06/2016 06/06/2016: The landscape plan shows trees in a few areas that are too close to storm or water service lines. Please revise and provide 6’ of separation between the trees and utilities. This can be addressed at final. RESPONSE: Trees adjusted. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 04/19/2016: In the parking garages at the head of some of the stalls are bicycle parking. Please put in wheels at the head of these stalls. RESPONSE: Wheel stops were added. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/19/2016 04/19/2016: Are there lights on the building? RESPONSE: Yes, please see lighting plan. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/15/2016 06/15/2016: Need a walk-in access on the north trash enclosure. RESPONSE: A walk-in access will be provided on both trash enclosures.