HomeMy WebLinkAboutNORTH COLLEGE DRIVE THRU - PDP - PDP160014 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
May 9, 2016
Sam Coutts
Ripley Design, Inc.
419 Canyon Ave Ste 200
Fort Collins, CO 80521
RE: North College Drive Thru, PDP160014, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Comment Responses: Ripley Design, Northern Engineering, Vaught Frye Larson Architects
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: As discussed at Conceptual Review, a connecting walkway is
needed to link the restaurant to the neighborhood to the west and south. This
connection must tie directly to a logical destination such as the entrance or the
outside patio and not simply terminate at the parking lot. Please contact the
owner of the adjoining property to decide on the best location to make this
connection. Please note that a connecting walkway was part of the approved
Final Plan for Taco Bell and is expected to be a component of this project as
well.
Ripley Response: Despite several attempts, we were unable to make contact with the owner of the
adjacent property. However, a connection to the adjacent property has been shown. The location is at
the point where the drive on the adjacent property abits our property. This will allow the owner of the
adjacent property to indstall a gate to provide easy access. A walk system has been provided to the patio.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: It is not clear from the site plan the status of the existing fence and
its location along the west and south property lines. Who owns this fence? Is
the fence six foot high solid wood or is it chain link? Given the fact that an
2
auto-related use, with evening hours of operation, is being proposed next to
residential, this fence takes on added importance in accomplishing
compatibility. Staff will inspect this fence to determine its ability to provide the
necessary buffering called for in Sections 3.5.1(H)(I)(J). If not suitable, a new
fence (with gate or opening for the aforementioned walkway) will be required.
Ripley Response: Noted
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The site plan needs to indicate the location of both the menu
board and the pick-up window. Please indicate the number of cars that can be
stacked behind both features.
Ripley Response: The menu board and drive up window have been shown on the plans. Three large
vehicles stack at the menu board and two at the pickup window.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: On the site plan, please label the building entry, width of all
sidewalks and walkways, directional arrows and other appurtenances. For
example, Taco Johns included an exterior chiller which then required an
architectural cladding in order to blend in with the building. Since the end user
is not known at this time, perhaps a note that addresses this issue can be
added.
Ripley Response: Items above have noted on the site plan.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: It appears that for a project of this size, the Cover Sheet and Site
Plan could be combined.
Ripley Response: We could not fit everything required between the cover sheet and the site plan on one
sheet, so we have kept it as is.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The Landscape Plan is too vague and needs to provide more
detail on how buffering is accomplished along the west and south property lines.
Please coordinate the landscaping along these property lines with either the
existing or new fencing.
Ripley Response: A detailed landscape plan has been provided.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The Landscape Plan needs to add Evergreen Trees. As presently
indicated, there are none. Evergreen Trees need to be evenly distributed
throughout the site and not just clustered in one location.
Ripley Response: Evergreen trees have been added to the plan. In addition, upright evergreen shrubs
have been added to the plans to provide screening.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The Landscape Plan needs to indicate how the electrical
transformer will be screened. Will screening be by a solid enclosure (meeting
the required clearance specifications) or by landscaping?
Ripley Response: The transformers have been screened with landscape. See the landscape plan.
3
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: Please note that landscaping will be a key determining factor in
evaluating compliance with Sections 3.5.1(H)(I)(J).
Ripley Response: Noted. The site is surrounded on 2 sides by a 6’ wood fence. Landscape has been
provided along the fence to soften it. In addition, where the fence ends, upright evergreen shrubs have
been added for screening.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: On the architectural elevations, please indicate the roof-top
mechanical screen wall and describe its material and color to match that found
on the building exterior.
Ripley Response: Noted
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The building needs to comply with Section 3.5.3(E)(6) in that in
addition to a distinctive base, it also needs a distinctive top. A “metal cap”
does not qualify as a distinctive top. For a flat roof building, please consider
adding either a cornice or a faux mansard. If a cornice is selected, please
provide a dimensioned detail so the depth can be evaluated.
Cornice detail has been added
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: Please remove the blade sign from the elevations.
Blade sign removed
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The left side of the south elevation appears a bit stark as there is
little relief past the pick-up window. Please consider adding features/materials
that improve the articulation of the south façade. Perhaps the awning over the
pick-up window could be further embellished and/or lengthened or the brick field
increased.
Awning has been added and brick field increased
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: Ultimately, final documents will be recorded. Staff recommends
using the correct spelling “Through” versus the slang “Thru.” Correct spelling will
stand the test of time.
Updated “Thru” to “Through”
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Katie Sexton, 970-221-6501, ksexton@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Repayment for public improvements and ROW along the College
Avenue frontage will be due to the City at time of building permit.
Noted
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: The utility easement along College Avenue will need to be
extended to 15 feet in width.
4
The utility easement along College Ave has been adjusted from 10’ to 15’
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Legal public access from the North into the site needs to be
confirmed - assuming emergency access will need to be dedicated here, the
most simple way to do this is to dedicate an emergency access and access
easement for the driveway by separate document. The recording number for
this easement will need to be on the plat.
An emergency access easement has been added to the plans adjacent to the north property line.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: A utility easement will need to be dedicated over the sewer main -
refer to the utilities department for the required width.
A 20’ Easement has been dedicated over the 12” Sewer main
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Drainage easements may be required by the stormwater
department for the rain garden and underground detention.
Noted
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Internal to the site, the utility plan labels "emergency access and
access easements" - the plat is dedicating emergency access only (which is all
that is needed).
Utility Plan only calls out Emergency Access Easement now
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Honey locust leaves can clog up pavers and necessitate additional
maintenance - this is something to consider as the landscape plan is finalized.
Ripley Response: Trees have been changed to hackberry.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Should the temporary construction easement be vacated with this
plat?
Yes. Easement has been removed.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/27/2016
04/27/2016: Will any exterior lighting be provided on the site? If so, please
provide a photometric plan and detailed specs for light fixtures.
In regard to LED light fixtures, cooler color temperatures are generally harsher
at night and cause more skyglow and disruption to circadian rhythms for both
humans and wildlife. Please consider a warmer color temperature (warm white /
3000K or less) for any LED light fixtures. Please also consider fixtures with
dimming capabilities so that light levels can be adjusted as needed.
Ripley Response: No exterior lighting is proposed with this PDP.
5
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/27/2016
04/27/2016: I will review the detailed planting plan for the planting areas at the
time of Final Plan (unless submitted sooner). Given that a few native trees will
be removed from the site (lanceleaf cottonwood, Rocky Mountain juniper),
please incorporate native shrubs and perennials into your landscaping.
Ripley Response: Noted
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016:
Provide a final landscape plan that applies standards in LUC 3.2.1.
Ripley Response: A final landscape plan has been provided
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016:
In reference to the lance leaf cottonwood generally located near the center of the
lot. If the project is pursuing retaining the tree it should be evaluated by a
certified arborist with and aerial evaluation. An aerial evaluation involves
checking the tree with a bucket truck or with a climber. Retaining this tree
appears to not be very feasible. It is currently shown to be removed. Provide an
explanation of the reasons why the tree cannot be retained.
Ripley Response: There is concern the tree would not survive the grading required for the adjacent
development. In addition, the 6”-8” cavity in the base is a concern.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Coy Althoff, , CAlthoff@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Light & Power has primary electric facilities running along the west
side of N. College Ave. in front of these properties. Both single and 3-phase
power is available to this area.
Ripley Response: noted
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site
charges and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this
development.
Ripley Response: noted
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Transformer locations shall be within 10' of a paved surface and
6
must have a minimum of an 8' clearance from the front side and a 3' clearance
around the sides and rear. (1000 kVA up to 2500 kVA requires 4' around the
sides and rear.)
Ripley Response: transformer located per clearances above
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the
transformer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility
plans.
Ripley Response: transformer located
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Street trees will need to be adjusted based on the location of the
streetlights. Forty feet of clearance to the streetlight will need to be maintained
by shade trees and fifteen feet by ornamental trees.
Ripley Response: This development is not responsible for the street trees. The street trees and lights
were recently provided with the North College avenue upgrade project done by the City.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and
Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1Form.pdf
Ripley Response: will be provided at final plan
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any
questions at 221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge
processes, and use our fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/28/2016
04/28/2016: FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS
Emergency Access Easements must be continuous with a connection to the
Public Way. The current EAE stops at the north side of the property and needs
to connect to College Ave.
EAE has been extended
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/28/2016
04/28/2016: FIRE LANE MARKING
Fire lanes signs must be provided and labeled on future plans. Code language
provided below.
> IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access
roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs
complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12
7
inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective
background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus
road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.
Ripley Response: noted
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/06/2016
05/06/2016: DEAD-END FIRE LANES
The current plan details a dead-end fire lane in excess of 150' without a
turnaround. One will be needed. Code language provided below.
> IFC 503.2.5 and Appendix D: Dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150
feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire
apparatus.
Ripley Response: plan now allows for a turn around through the parking lot
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft., therefore Erosion and
Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control
requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of
Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials
Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan,
Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need
clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions
please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Will be provided after PDP
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The insulator row needs to be sized for the 12-hour drain time per
Urban Drainage in order to count towards WQ or LID treatment.
Drain Time is 12 hours for all water quality amenities
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The 100-year spill in an emergency situation should be directed
towards College Avenue, not the trailer park.
Noted
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: The City would suggest reevaluating all of the detention and LID
design to incorporate a more economically feasible alternative.
Noted
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
8
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please spell out "North" in the title block.
Titleblock updated
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please make corrections to the Benchmark Statement as marked.
See redlines.
Benchmark Statement updated
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please make changes to the Basis Of Bearings statement as
marked. See redlines.
Basis of Bearings updated
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: All benchmark statements & Basis Of Bearings statements must
match on all sheets.
They now match on all sheets.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please remove the Temporary Construction Easement shown on
sheet EX1. It has expired per reception #20140026532 page 27/35.
Easement has been removed
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they
are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the
Subdivision Plat.
Noted
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Some of the right of way descriptions shown are incorrect. If they
are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the
Subdivision Plat.
Noted
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please spell out "North" in the title blocks on all sheets. See
redlines.
Ripley Response: Noted
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Ripley Response: Noted
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please make changes to the Statement Of Ownership And
Subdivision as marked. See redlines.
Redlines have been addressed
9
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Are there any Lienholders for this property? If so, please add a
signature block. If not, please add a note stating there are none, and include
response in written comments.
A lienholder block has been added.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please make corrections to the Basis Of Bearings statement as
marked. See redlines.
Basis of Bearings statement updated
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please address the comments regarding access to the north of
the property. See redlines.
We have added linework showing the existing driveway easement, but a planning on added an Emergency
Access Easement by separate document.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please label all surrounding properties with "Unplatted" or the
subdivision name. This includes properties across right of ways. See redlines.
Added.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Are easements required along the north, west & south property
lines? The plans show a sewer line on/near the west lot line.
All easements are now shown on the plat.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Per reception #20140026532 page 27/35, the TCE has expired.
Please remove.
This easement has been removed.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: The 10' Utility Easement at reception #93066787 extinguishes
with the dedication of the 15' right of way. See redlines.
This easement has been removed
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the
aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at
jcounty@fcgov.com
The monument records have been provided.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please change the title to North College Drive Thru.
Ripley Response: plans updated
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please spell out "North" in the title blocks on all sheets. See
redlines.
Ripley Response: plans updated
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines.
10
Ripley Response: plans updated
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they
are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the
Subdivision Plat.
Ripley Response: plans updated
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Ripley Response: plans updated
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: Please remove the 10' Existing Utility Easement shown along
College Avenue. This easement extinguished with a ROW dedication in 2014.
See redlines.
Ripley Response: plans updated
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/03/2016
05/03/2016: TIS has been received and reviewed. The TIS notes that a
southbound right turn lane is warranted, but the lane is not shown on the plans,
(the plans show a 'softened' right turn radius to allow inbound vehicles to turn
more quickly). Will the applicant be requesting a variance from the right turn
lane requirement?
Ripley Response: no variance required, turn lane has been provided
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/02/2016
05/02/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation
requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Ripley Response: noted
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
05/04/2016: Please show the existing water main on the utility plan.
Currently showing existing water service stubs. Will need to schedule survey to go out and take a
few shots of the existing waterline.
Department: Zoning
11
Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970-416-2338, mglasgow@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
How will trash pick-up work? Are there specific pick up times and areas to pick
up?
Ripley Response: This detail will be provided at the final plan or amendment level once an end user is
retained.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
Please provide full landscape plan to show what is going in "Planting Area"
Ripley Response: A detailed landscape plan has been provided.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
Please provide building dimensions of the proposed building on the site plan
Ripley Response: Noted-see the site plan
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
LUC 3.5.1 (I) (6) All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from
public view from both above and below by integrating it into building and roof
design to the maximum extent feasible
VFLA Response: parapet has been provided to screen mechanical equipment. Note has also been added
on elevations to emphasize the requirement.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/04/2016
LUC 3.2.4 (C) Due to the amount of public and decorative lighting in the area, a
photometric site plan will not be required; however, if there is any proposed
lighting on the building, we will need cut-sheets of the fixtures.
Ripley Response: Noted