Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOX GROVE PHASE ONE - FDP - FDP140030 - CORRESPONDENCE -Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview January 08, 2015 Stephanie Sigler Ripley Design, Inc. 401 W. Mountain Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Fox Grove Phase One, FDP140030, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126 or jholland@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Driveway Locations: Each individual driveway location must be shown on the site and landscape plans. The driveways/curb cuts are a significant element to the space planning exercise and coordinating their locations at a later time will cause problems. Spring Creek Farms North Filing 4 is a good graphic example. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Housing models: Please provide me a note for review discussing how at least 7 housing models from the ODP will be incorporated into phases 1 and 2. Also provide reference notes describing the modifications and conditions approved with the ODP and PDP. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Please refer to the attached comment letters for additional utility comments. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Fencing: Would recommend lowering the privacy fencing to 5 feet. Plan needs to show column locations so that their locations are not decided / coordinated at a later time. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: 3 rail fence detail – please show where is this located on the plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Landscape plant list must show total quantities and species diversity. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: In addition to comments from forestry, please change the Skymaster Oak selection to a shade tree that provides more canopy for a more consistent form along the streets. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Toned linework- please eliminate this. If used, try dialing it back to 60% solid. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Show on the site plan that Tract A / Phase 2 to be submitted as a separate PDP. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Add standard planting details to the landscape plans. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Label Outlot H as a Small Neighborhood Park. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: What is happening in terms of common landscaping and fencing along Carriage Parkway and in all locations where lots back up to open space? Landscaping and fencing transition must be provided. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tsiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: The (4) off-site easement dedication documents have been received. An additional TDRF fee of $1,000 is needed to dedicate easements by separate document. Once approved, a recording fee to record the documents at the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder’s Office will be needed. The recording fee will be calculated and communicated when the dedication documents are final. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Carriage Parkway: The vertical curve at station 16+08.11 does not meet minimum curve length or k value for a collector road. Please reference table 7-3 and figure 7-17. See redlines on sheet R1 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Carriage Parkway: The vertical curve flowline (station 14+61.66) on Carriage Parkway does not meet minimum flowline grade of 0.5% into proposed inlets. See redlines on sheet R1 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Carriage Parkway: Please label the slope of existing Carriage Pkwy on plan and profiles on sheet R1- see redlines. Also, please label the slope where Carriage Pkwy ends at the interim tie-in point along the south property line. See redlines Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Carriage Parkway: Rip rap is needed where the curb and gutter terminates on Carriage Parkway at the south property line. See sheet R1 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Huntsman Drive: The minimum flowline grade of 0.5% is not being met on Huntsman Dr. Please revise. See sheet R4 Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Huntsman Drive: You are exceeding the maximum 0.4% single point grade break on the Huntsman outside flowline. Please revise. See sheet R4. See other minor redline comments on sheet R4. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Fox Grove Drive: You are exceeding the maximum 0.4% single point grade break on Fox Grove Drive at multiple locations. See redlines on sheets R5 and R7. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Vixen Drive: Please label the slope where Vixen ends at the interim tie-in point along the south property line. See sheet R9 Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Vixen Drive: Rip rap is needed where the curb and gutter terminates on Vixen Dr at the south property line. See sheet R1 Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Additional spot elevation points are needed on all intersection details. Please reference LCUASS drawings 727 and 728. Also, please label the slope of the curb returns as noted. See sheet R10 and R11 redlines. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Please label the transition from vertical curb and gutter on Carriage Pkwy to roll-over curb and gutter on Kit Den Dr and also on Fox Grove Dr. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: There are a few of the storm drain MH along Fox Grove Dr that are located in the curb and gutter. Please relocate the MH into the road away from the concrete gutter pan. See sheet ST1. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: 14.Please label the amount of cover over storm drain line 7. See sheet ST4 Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: Please label the concrete sidewalk culvert on the Utility Plan (sheet U2) and on sheet G3. See redlines. Also, please add Storm water construction detail D-12B to the details sheet for the concrete sidewalk culvert. Contact me if you need this detail. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014 12/19/2014: See other minor redline comments in the Utility Plan set and contact me with any questions. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Celebration Maple is used as a street tree with the label UAM. It is not on the City Street Tree List. Celebration maple is a Hybrid maple cross between Red Maple and Silver Maple which is not adapted to the soils in Fort Collins and does not survive or thrive long term. Please change this to a species on the City of Fort Collins Street Trees list. Accolade Elm might be one species to consider as a replacement for the 34 Celebration Maples. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Radiant Crab is used as a street tree on lots 60 and 61 by the street light. Please change Radiant Crab to Chanticleer Pear or Red Baron Crabapple that has a more upright canopy. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Only one street tree per lot is feasible on narrow lots that are 60 feet or less in front width to meet driveway and utility separation standards LUC 3.2.1 D2 a. The following narrow lots appear to have two trees per lot. (20, 23 31, 35, 40, 43, 49, 51, 53, 57) Reduce trees to one per lot at these locations and adjust rows for preferred spacing or evaluate these individual lots for actual driveway and utility separation standards to determine if any extra trees are feasible for some of these listed lots. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/31/2014 12/31/2014: Please see minor comments on the redlined plans. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: Please tie all coordinate values to the project boundary. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: There are cut off text issues. See redlines. Topic: Easements Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: We get a different square footage & acreage for the Access Easement on Lot 1, Lee MLD. Please provide a closure report to verify the information shown on the legal description & sketch. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: The title in the title blocks do not match the main title on the cover sheet. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: There are sheet titles running under the linework of the title blocks. Please reduce or rearrange the titles to fit the space. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Please add new title commitment information as available. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: The text in the Land Use Table is fuzzy. Please clean it up. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Tract A's use in the Land Use Table on sheet 2 does not match what is shown on sheet 3. Please rectify. See redlines. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Curve C102 is missing from the Curve Table on sheet 2. See redlines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document, must be added prior to producing mylars. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: The 20' Sewer Easement per Lee MLD at the northwest corner of the plat, needs to be tied to the outer boundary. See redlines. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Please check the distance along the north line of the property. It does not scale what is shown. See redlines. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: There are several lines that need to be labeled in multiple locations. See redlines. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Please add bearings, distances & curves as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: All easements must be labeled & locatable. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Is the 20' Drainage Easement between Lots 43 & 44 necessary? All of Outlot E is a Drainage Easement. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Please remove the bearing & distance shown (marked) along the south boundary. See redlines. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: There is an arrow defining a 6' Utility Easement on sheet 4, and it is not certain which line the arrow points to. See redlines. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Are the rear lines of Lots 64-67 meant to be different from the north line of the 20' Sewer Easement per Lee MLD? See redlines. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Please label the use of Outlot G. See redlines. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Please review the deed & verify Dimensions and other information for the Carriage Parkway dedication. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: The title in the title blocks do not match the main title on the cover sheet. See redlines. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: There are duplicated text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014 12/30/2014: Please remove the "Lot 2" shown on Lots 29 & 30. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: For the intersection detail sheets, each intersection needs only one set of street name signs (not signs on both stop signs). But the street name signs need to include both street names (criss-crossed above the stop sign). If this is confusing, let me know and I can explain over the phone. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/29/2014 12/29/2014: The Planning signature block on the plat needs to updated to match the Planning signature block on the site plan, specifically to read Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services.