HomeMy WebLinkAboutLANDMARK APARTMENTS EXPANSION - PDP - PDP160013 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYLANDMARK APARTMENTS EXPANSION
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
MARCH 2016
Prepared for:
Summit Management Services, Inc.
730 West Market Street
Akron, OH 44303-1070
Prepared by:
...-_~/;1/_.' _
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: 970-669-2061
FAX: 970-669-5034
Project #1612
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 2
Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 2
Streets ............................................................................................................................. 2
Existing Traffic ................................................................................................................. 5
Existing Operation ........................................................................................................... 5
Pedestrian Facilities ........................................................................................................ 5
Bicycle Facilities .............................................................................................................. 5
Transit Facilities .............................................................................................................. 8
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................. 9
Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 9
Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................... 9
Background Traffic Projections ..................................................................................... 12
Trip Assignment ............................................................................................................ 12
Signal Warrants ............................................................................................................. 12
Operation Analysis ........................................................................................................ 12
Geometry ...................................................................................................................... 18
Pedestrian Level of Service ........................................................................................... 18
Bicycle Level of Service ................................................................................................ 18
Transit Level of Service ................................................................................................. 18
IV. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 20
LIST OF TABLES
1. Current Peak Hour Operation .................................................................................... 8
2. Trip Generation ......................................................................................................... 9
3. Short Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation .......................................... 16
4. Short Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation ..................................................... 17
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Site Location ............................................................................................................. 3
2. Existing Intersection Geometry.................................................................................. 4
3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic .......................................................................................... 6
4. Adjusted/Balanced Recent Peak Hour Traffic ........................................................... 7
5. Site Plan .................................................................................................................. 10
6. Trip Distribution ....................................................................................................... 11
7. Short Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Traffic ................................................ 13
8. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ........................................................................... 14
9. Short Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........................................................... 15
10. Short Range (2020) Geometry ................................................................................ 19
APPENDICES
A. Base Assumptions Form
B. Peak Hour Traffic Counts
C. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins Motor
Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections)
D. Short Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation
E. Short Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation
F. Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service Worksheets
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 1
I. INTRODUCTION
This Intermediate transportation impact study (TIS) addresses the capacity,
geometric, and control requirements for the proposed Landmark Apartments Expansion
development. The proposed Landmark Apartments Expansion development is located in
the southeast quadrant of the Shields/Prospect intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado.
During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the
owner/developer (Summit Management Services, Inc.), the project engineering consultant
(Northern Engineering), the project architect (Infusion Architects), the project planning
consultant (The TB Group), Fort Collins Traffic Engineering, and Fort Collins
Transportation Planning. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort
Collins TIS Guidelines in the “Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards” (LCUASS). A
scoping discussion was held with the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. The
Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form and related documents are provided
in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps:
- Collect physical, traffic, and development data;
- Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment;
- Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
- Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections;
- Analyze signal warrants;
- Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of
transportation
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 2
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The location of the Landmark Apartments is shown in Figure 1. It is important
that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented.
Land Use
Land uses in the area are primarily commercial or residential. There are
residential uses to the east, north, and south of the site. There are commercial uses to
the west of the site. Colorado State University is north of the site. The center of Fort
Collins lies to the east of the proposed Landmark Apartments Expansion site.
Streets
The primary streets near the Landmark Apartments Expansion site are Shields
Street, Prospect Road, and Hobbit Street. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the existing
geometry at the key intersections.
Shields Street is west of the proposed Landmark Apartments Expansion site. It
is a north-south street classified as a four-lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street
Plan. Currently, Shields Street has a four-lane cross section. At the Shields/Prospect
intersection, Shields Street has northbound and southbound left-turn lanes, two through
lanes in each direction, and northbound and southbound right-turn lanes. The
Shields/Prospect intersection has signal control. At the Shields/Hobbit intersection,
Shields Street has a southbound left-turn lane, two through lanes in each direction, and
a northbound right-turn lane. The Shields/Hobbit intersection has stop sign control on
Hobbit Street. The posted speed limit on Shields Street is 35 mph south of Prospect
Road and 30 mph north of Prospect Road.
Prospect Road is north of the proposed Landmark Apartments Expansion site. It
is an east-west street classified as a four-lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street
Plan. Currently, Prospect Road has a four-lane cross section. At the Shields/Prospect
intersection, Prospect Road has dual eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes, two
through lanes in each direction, and an eastbound right-turn lane. The right-turn volume
on the westbound approach at the Shields/Prospect intersection indicates the need for a
right-turn lane. The need for this right-turn lane has been demonstrated in numerous
traffic studies for many years. Building this right-turn lane would likely require
acquisition of at least three properties along Prospect Road, east of Shields Street. The
decision to build this right-turn lane rests with the City of Fort Collins. The posted speed
limit on this segment of Prospect Road is 35 mph.
Hobbit Street is south the Landmark Apartments Expansion site. It is an east-
west street classified as a local street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently,
Hobbit Street has a two-lane cross section with parking on both sides of the street.
There is no posted speed limit on this segment of Hobbit Street.
Spring Creek Trail
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
Stuart
Existing
Landmark
Apartments
Lake
Sheely
SCALE: 1"=600'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 3
EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Figure 2
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 4
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
- Denotes Lane
Functions
As
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 5
Existing Traffic
Recent peak hour traffic volumes at the Shields/Prospect and Shields/Hobbit
intersections are shown in Figure 3. The counts at the Shields/Prospect intersection
were obtained in September 2014 by the City of Fort Collins. The counts at the Shields/
Hobbit intersection were obtained in February 2016. Raw traffic count data is provided
in Appendix B. Since the traffic counts were done on different days, the intersection
volumes were averaged (adjusted/balanced). Figure 4 shows the averaged/balanced
recent peak hour traffic volumes.
Existing Operation
The Shields/Prospect and Shields/Hobbit intersections were evaluated and the
peak hour operation is displayed in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix
C. The key intersections are currently operating acceptably with existing control,
geometry, and signal timing in the peak hours, except for the west leg of the
Shields/Prospect intersection during the afternoon peak hour. With an adjustment in the
City signal timing, acceptable operation is achieved for the Shields/Prospect
intersection. The intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2010
Highway Capacity Manual. A description of level of service for signalized and
unsignalized intersections from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing
the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in
Appendix C. The Landmark Apartments Expansion site is in an area termed “mixed-use
district.” In areas termed “mixed-use district,” acceptable operation at signalized
intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E or better for each
movement, leg, and overall. At unsignalized intersections, acceptable operation is
considered to be at level of service F for any approach leg for an arterial/local
intersection. In such areas, it is expected that there would be substantial delays to the
minor street movements at unsignalized intersections during the peak hours. This is
considered to be normal and acceptable in urban areas. It is important to note that the
northbound queue from the Shields/Prospect signalized intersection stacked pass the
Shields/Hobbit intersection. However, in almost every instance, the northbound
queuing traffic left a gap and did not block the vehicles on Hobbit Street. This enabled
turning vehicles from Hobbit Street to experience less delay when attempting to execute
the turns.
Pedestrian Facilities
There are sidewalks along Shields Street, Hobbit Street, and Prospect Road
within the pedestrian influence area. Many of the street cross section elements were
built prior to the current standards. Therefore, some of the sidewalks may be
considered to be substandard. The Spring Creek Trail crosses Shields Street south of
West Stuart Street.
AM/PM
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 6
56/160
907/970
136/137
59/181
650/1092
155/221
241/169
713/396
152/159
145/272
233/637
71/196
853/1623
7/26
1042/1460
2/13
20/34
6/4
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
AM/PM
AVERAGED/BALANCED
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 7
55/174
892/1057
134/150
59/181
645/1168
155/221
241/169
713/396
151/170
145/272
233/637
71/210
860/1522
7/26
1061/1347
2/13
20/34
6/4
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 8
Bicycle Facilities
There are bicycle lanes along Shields Street and along Prospect Road, west of Shields
Street, within the study area. Prospect Road, east of Shields Street, is constrained, in
that on-street bike lanes do not exist due to the width of Prospect Road. The Spring
Creek Trail crosses Shields Street south of West Stuart Street.
Transit Facilities
Currently, this area of Fort Collins is served by Transfort Routes 19, 2, and 3.
Route 19 operates along Shields Street, Route 2 operates, westbound, along Prospect
Road, and Route 3 operates eastbound on Prospect Road, west of Shields Street, and
northbound on Shields Street, north of Prospect Road.
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
Shields/Prospect
(signal)
EB LT D E (E)
EB T D D (D)
EB RT C C (C)
EB APPROACH D D (D)
WB LT D E (E)
WB T D F (E)
WB T/RT D F (E)
WB APPROACH D F (E)
NB LT B D (D)
NB T C D (D)
NB RT A B (B)
NB APPROACH C D (D)
SB LT B D (D)
SB T B D (D)
SB RT A C (C)
SB APPROACH B D (D)
OVERALL C D (D)
Shields/Hobbit
(stop sign)
WB LT F F
WB RT B C
WB APPROACH C D
SB LT B B
(*) Adjusted signal timing
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 9
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Landmark Apartments Expansion is a residential apartment development with
76 dwelling units (175 beds). Figure 5 shows a site plan of the Landmark Apartments
Expansion. The existing Landmark Apartments and the proposed Landmark
Apartments Expansion are marketed to Colorado State University students. The short
range analysis (Year 2020) includes development of the Landmark Apartments
Expansion and an appropriate increase in background traffic due to normal growth and
other potential developments in the area. The site plan shows that the Landmark
Apartments Expansion will use existing Hobbit Street to access Shields Street. There
will be a pedestrian connection to the sidewalk on Prospect Road.
Trip Generation
Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this
upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information
contain in Trip Generation, 9
th
Edition, ITE is customarily used to estimate the trips that
would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at a site. However, the City of Fort
Collins has performed a trip generation study for student oriented apartments. Therefore,
the trip generation rates calculated by the City will be used. There is a mix of two and
three bedroom apartments for a total of 175 beds. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicle
movement from origin to destination. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a
daily and peak hour basis. The trip generation of the Landmark Apartments Expansion
development resulted in 464 daily trip ends, 33 morning peak hour trip ends, and 73
afternoon peak hour trip ends.
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
Code Use Size
AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out
220 Apartment (Fort
Collins Rates) 175 Beds 2.65 464 0.04 7 0.15 26 0.27 47 0.15 26
Trip Distribution
Trip distribution for the Landmark Apartments Expansion was based on
existing/future travel patterns, land uses in the area, consideration of trip attractions in
Fort Collins, and engineering judgment. Figure 6 shows the trip distribution for the short
range (2020) analysis future. The trip distribution was agreed to by City of Fort Collins
staff in the scoping discussions.
SCALE: 1"=100'
SITE PLAN Figure 5
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 10
HOBBIT STREET
24' PRIVATE DRIVE
EXISTING
LANDMARK
APARTMENTS
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
Stuart
Existing
Landmark
Apartments
Lake
Sheely
10% 20%
25% 45%
SCALE: 1"=600'
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 11
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 12
Background Traffic Projections
Figure 7 shows the short range (2020) background traffic projections.
Background traffic projections for the short range future horizon were obtained by
reviewing the North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan and various traffic
studies prepared for this area of Fort Collins. Based upon these sources, it was
determined that traffic volumes on Shields Street and Prospect Road would increase by
approximately 1.0% per year in the short range future. The background traffic growth
was agreed to by City of Fort Collins staff in the scoping discussions. In addition to this,
site generated traffic from the 808 West Prospect Road (The Slab) development and the
812 West Lake Street development was included in the background traffic forecasts.
Trip Assignment
Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be
loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution
process. Figure 8 shows the site generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 9 shows
the short range (2020) total (site plus background) peak hour traffic assignment.
Signal Warrants
As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants
are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The Shields/
Prospect intersection is currently signalized. The Shields/Hobbit stop sign controlled
intersection will not meet signal warrants in the future.
Operation Analysis
Operation analyses were performed at the Shields/Prospect and Shields/Hobbit
intersections. The operation analyses were conducted for the short range future,
reflecting year 2020 conditions.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7, the key intersections operate in the
short range (2020) background traffic future, with the existing geometry and signal timing,
as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D.
The key intersections are currently operating acceptably with existing control, geometry,
and signal timing in the peak hours, except for the west leg of the Shields/Prospect
intersection during the afternoon peak hour. With an adjustment in the City signal
timing, acceptable operation is achieved for the Shields/Prospect intersection.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9, the key intersections operate in the
short range (2020) total traffic future, with the existing geometry and signal timing, as
indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. As
AM/PM
SHORT RANGE (2020) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 13
57/181
931/1121
139/156
63/190
681/1225
161/230
251/181
742/412
157/177
156/288
244/665
81/225
912/1601
7/26
1107/1424
2/13
20/34
6/4
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
AM/PM
SITE GENERATED
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 14
3/3
12/12
5/5
3/21
1/5
1/9
5/35
2/12
20/20
6/6
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
AM/PM
SHORT RANGE (2020) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 15
60/184
943/1133
144/161
63/190
684/1246
161/230
251/181
742/412
158/182
156/288
244/665
82/234
912/1601
12/61
1107/1424
4/25
40/54
12/10
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 16
TABLE 3
Short Range (2020) Background Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
Shields/Prospect
(signal)
EB LT D E (E)
EB T D D (D)
EB RT C C (C)
EB APPROACH D D (D)
WB LT D E (E)
WB T D F (E)
WB T/RT D F (E)
WB APPROACH D F (E)
NB LT B D (E)
NB T C D (E)
NB RT A B (B)
NB APPROACH C D (E)
SB LT C D (E)
SB T C D (E)
SB RT A C (C)
SB APPROACH C D (E)
OVERALL C E (E)
Shields/Hobbit
(stop sign)
WB LT F F
WB RT B C
WB APPROACH D D
SB LT B B
(*) Adjusted signal timing
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 17
TABLE 4
Short Range (2020) Total Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
Shields/Prospect
(signal)
EB LT D E (E)
EB T D D (D)
EB RT C C (C)
EB APPROACH D D (D)
WB LT D E (E)
WB T D F (E)
WB T/RT D F (E)
WB APPROACH D F (E)
NB LT B D (E)
NB T C D (E)
NB RT A B (B)
NB APPROACH C D (E)
SB LT C D (E)
SB T C E (E)
SB RT A C (C)
SB APPROACH C D (E)
OVERALL C E (E)
Shields/Hobbit
(stop sign)
WB LT F F
WB RT B C
WB APPROACH D F
SB LT B B
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 18
with the background traffic, the key intersections are currently operating acceptably with
existing control, geometry, and signal timing in the peak hours, except for the west leg
of the Shields/Prospect intersection during the afternoon peak hour. With an
adjustment in the City signal timing, acceptable operation is achieved for the Shields/
Prospect intersection.
Geometry
Figure 10 shows a schematic of the likely short range (2020) geometry. This is the
existing geometry at the Shields/Prospect and Shields/Hobbit intersections. At the
Shields/Prospect intersection, a westbound right-turn lane is required with the current
traffic. As mentioned earlier, the decision to build this right-turn lane rests with the City
of Fort Collins. This development proposal will contribute no traffic to this movement.
According to Figure 8-4, LCUASS, a northbound right-turn lane will not be warranted at
the Shields/Hobbit intersection, however this lane currently exists.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Landmark
Apartments Expansion site. There will be five pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet
of the Landmark Apartments Expansion site. These are: 1) the residential area to the
east of the site, 2) Colorado State University and the residential area to the north of the
site, 3) the residential area to the northwest of the site, 4) the commercial area to the
west of the site, and 5) the commercial area to the southwest of the site. This site is in
an area type termed “other.” As mentioned earlier, many of the street cross section
elements were built prior to the current standards. Therefore, some of the sidewalks
may be considered to be substandard. Acceptable pedestrian level of service will not
be achieved for all pedestrian destinations. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided
in Appendix F. The minimum level of service for “other” is C for all areas of evaluation.
The Spring Creek Trail crosses Shields Street south of West Stuart Street.
Bicycle Level of Service
Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Landmark
Apartments Expansion development. There will be three bicycle destinations within
1320 feet of the Landmark Apartments Expansion development. These are: 1) the
commercial area to the west of the site, 2) the commercial area to the southwest of the
site, and 3) Colorado State University to the north of the site. The Bicycle LOS
Worksheet is provided in Appendix F. The base level of service is C and is B for each
of the bicycle destinations. This site is connected to Shields Street. Therefore, it is
concluded that level of service B can be achieved. The Spring Creek Trail crosses
Shields Street south of West Stuart Street.
SHORT RANGE (2020) GEOMETRY Figure 10
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Page 19
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
- Denotes Lane
Functions
As
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 20
Transit Level of Service
This area of Fort Collins is served by Transfort Routes 19, 2, and 3. Route 19
operates along Shields Street, Route 2 operates, westbound, along Prospect Road, and
Route 3 operates eastbound on Prospect Road, west of Shields Street, and northbound
on Shields Street, north of Prospect Road.
DELICH Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
ASSOCIATES Page 21
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This study assessed the impacts of the Landmark Apartments Expansion on the
street system in the vicinity of the proposed development in the short range (2020) and
long range (2035) future. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded:
- The development of the Landmark Apartments Expansion is feasible from a traffic
engineering standpoint. At full development, the Landmark Apartments Expansion
will generate approximately 464 daily trip ends, 33 morning peak hour trip ends,
and 73 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
- All intersections operate acceptably with the existing traffic and geometry. Current
traffic volumes indicate that a westbound auxiliary right-turn lane is required at the
Shields/Prospect intersection. The decision to build this lane rests with the City of
Fort Collins.
- The Shields/Prospect intersection is currently signalized. The Shields/Hobbit stop
sign controlled intersection will not have traffic signals in the future.
- In the short range (2020) future, given development of the Landmark Apartments
Expansion and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will operate
acceptably with an adjustment in the signal timing at the Shields/Prospect
intersection during the afternoon peak hour.
- The short range (2020) geometry is shown in Figure 10. This is the current
geometry.
- Acceptable level of service is achieved for bicycle and transit modes based upon
the measures in the multi-modal transportation guidelines and the Fort Collins
Pedestrian Plan. Many of the street cross section elements were built prior to
the current standards.
APPENDIX A
Spring Creek Trail
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
Stuart
Existing
Landmark
Apartments
Lake
Sheely
SCALE: 1"=600'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments TIS, February 2016
Page 3
SCALE: 1"=100'
SITE PLAN Figure 5
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments TIS, February 2016
Page 10
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
Code Use Size
AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out
220 Apartment (Fort
Collins Rates) 175 Beds 2.65 464 0.04 7 0.15 26 0.27 47 0.15 26
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
Stuart
Existing
Landmark
Apartments
Lake
Sheely
10% 20%
25% 45%
SCALE: 1"=600'
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments TIS, February 2016
Page 3
APPENDIX B
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 9/24/2014 Observer: City of Fort Collins
Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R = right turn Intersection: Shields/Prospect
S = straight
L = left turn
Time Northbound: Shields Southbound: Shields Total Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total Total
Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All
7:30 7 225 30 262 37 133 11 181 443 52 182 31 265 15 70 37 122 387 830
7:45 13 283 40 336 39 213 18 270 606 86 211 50 347 20 52 29 101 448 1054
8:00 19 188 34 241 36 142 18 196 437 50 159 30 239 17 60 34 111 350 787
8:15 17 211 32 260 43 162 12 217 477 53 161 41 255 19 51 45 115 370 847
7:30-8:30 56 907 136 1099 155 650 59 864 1963 241 713 152 1106 71 233 145 449 1555 3518
PHF 0.74 0.8 0.85 0.82 0.9 0.76 0.82 0.8 0.7 0.84 0.76 0.8 0.89 0.83 0.81 0.92 0.83
4:30 30 217 28 275 46 224 32 302 577 51 107 39 197 38 137 87 262 459 1036
4:45 41 277 30 348 56 280 45 381 729 43 96 39 178 42 163 58 263 441 1170
5:00 49 219 44 312 59 262 49 370 682 38 83 38 159 55 157 63 275 434 1116
5:15 40 257 35 332 60 326 55 441 773 37 110 43 190 61 180 64 305 495 1268
4:30-5:30 160 970 137 1267 221 1092 181 1494 2761 169 396 159 724 196 637 272 1105 1829 4590
PHF 0.82 0.88 0.78 0.91 0.92 0.84 0.82 0.85 0.83 0.9 0.92 0.92 0.8 0.88 0.78 0.91 0.9
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND, CO 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 2/11/2016 Observer: Michael
Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R = right turn Intersection: Shields/Hobbit
S = straight
L = left turn
Time Northbound: Shields Southbound: Shields Total Eastbound: Westbound: Hobbit Total Total
Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All
7:30 256 0 256 1 189 190 446 0 1 7 8 8 454
7:45 291 1 292 3 255 258 550 0 2 6 8 8 558
8:00 253 0 253 1 198 199 452 0 2 4 6 6 458
8:15 242 1 243 2 211 213 456 0 1 3 4 4 460
7:30-8:30 0 1042 2 1044 7 853 0 860 1904 0 0 0 0 6 0 20 26 26 1930
PHF n/a 0.9 0.5 0.89 0.58 0.84 n/a 0.83 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.75 n/a 0.71 0.81 0.86
4:30 350 2 352 7 384 391 743 0 2 6 8 8 751
4:45 355 3 358 5 397 402 760 0 1 10 11 11 771
5:00 383 5 388 7 441 448 836 0 0 8 8 8 844
5:15 372 3 375 7 401 408 783 0 1 10 11 11 794
4:30-5:30 0 1460 13 1473 26 1623 0 1649 3122 0 0 0 0 4 0 34 38 38 3160
PHF n/a 0.95 0.65 0.95 0.93 0.92 n/a 0.92 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.5 n/a 0.85 0.86 0.94
APPENDIX C
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Recent AM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent am.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 241 713 151 71 233 145 55 892 134 155 645 59
Future Volume (veh/h) 241 713 151 71 233 145 55 892 134 155 645 59
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 284 839 29 84 274 58 65 1049 36 182 759 0
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 530 939 418 166 436 91 386 1601 709 321 1735 776
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.49 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1574 3442 2896 601 1774 3539 1569 1774 3539 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 284 839 29 84 165 167 65 1049 36 182 759 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1574 1721 1770 1728 1774 1770 1569 1774 1770 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.4 25.1 1.5 2.6 9.6 10.0 2.1 25.4 0.7 5.7 15.3 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.4 25.1 1.5 2.6 9.6 10.0 2.1 25.4 0.7 5.7 15.3 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 530 939 418 166 266 260 386 1601 709 321 1735 776
V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.89 0.07 0.51 0.62 0.64 0.17 0.66 0.05 0.57 0.44 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 530 997 444 250 418 408 441 1601 709 358 1735 776
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.9 38.9 30.2 51.1 43.8 43.9 15.2 23.5 4.6 17.7 18.2 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 10.0 0.1 2.4 2.4 2.6 0.2 2.1 0.1 1.7 0.8 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.1 13.5 0.7 1.3 4.9 5.0 1.1 12.9 0.3 2.9 7.7 0.0
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.0 48.9 30.3 53.4 46.1 46.5 15.5 25.6 4.7 19.3 19.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS DDCDDDBCABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 1152 416 1150 941
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.2 47.8 24.3 19.1
Approach LOS D D C B
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.6 58.9 9.3 34.2 11.7 54.7 21.9 21.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 45.0 7.0 30.0 10.0 42.0 11.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 17.3 4.6 27.1 7.7 27.4 10.4 12.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 7.0 0.4 0.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 32.8
HCM 2010 LOS C
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Recent AM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent am.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 11 51 12 36 14 48 17 31
Maximum Split (%) 10.0% 46.4% 10.9% 32.7% 12.7% 43.6% 15.5% 28.2%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 89 100 41 53 89 103 72 41
End Time (s) 100 41 53 89 103 41 89 72
Yield/Force Off (s) 96 35 48 83 99 35 83 66
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96 15 48 67 99 21 83 49
Local Start Time (s) 48 59 0 12 48 62 31 0
Local Yield (s) 55 104 7 42 58 104 42 25
Local Yield 170(s) 55 84 7 26 58 90 42 8
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 110
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 90
Offset: 41 (37%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Recent PM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent pm.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 169 396 170 210 637 272 174 1057 150 221 1168 181
Future Volume (veh/h) 169 396 170 210 637 272 174 1057 150 221 1168 181
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 188 440 29 233 708 259 193 1174 53 246 1298 90
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 258 936 407 323 691 253 246 1392 605 291 1452 632
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.39 0.39 0.11 0.41 0.41
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1540 3442 2514 920 1774 3539 1539 1774 3539 1540
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 188 440 29 233 498 469 193 1174 53 246 1298 90
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1540 1721 1770 1665 1774 1770 1539 1774 1770 1540
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 12.5 1.7 7.9 33.0 33.0 7.6 36.1 1.8 9.5 41.0 4.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 12.5 1.7 7.9 33.0 33.0 7.6 36.1 1.8 9.5 41.0 4.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 258 936 407 323 487 458 246 1392 605 291 1452 632
V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.47 0.07 0.72 1.02 1.02 0.78 0.84 0.09 0.85 0.89 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 258 936 407 459 487 458 308 1392 605 353 1452 632
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.3 37.1 33.1 52.8 43.5 43.5 26.7 33.1 11.6 25.6 33.0 22.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.9 0.4 0.1 3.2 47.0 48.3 10.0 6.4 0.3 14.6 8.8 0.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 6.2 0.7 3.9 22.4 21.3 4.3 18.8 0.8 5.8 21.8 2.0
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.2 37.4 33.2 56.1 90.5 91.8 36.7 39.4 11.9 40.2 41.8 22.6
LnGrp LOS E D C E F F D D B D D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 657 1200 1420 1634
Approach Delay, s/veh 44.9 84.3 38.0 40.5
Approach LOS D F D D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.8 54.2 15.3 36.7 15.8 52.2 14.0 38.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 44.0 15.0 26.0 16.0 42.0 8.0 32.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.6 43.0 9.9 14.5 11.5 38.1 8.4 35.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.9 0.4 2.0 0.3 3.3 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 51.1
HCM 2010 LOS D
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Recent PM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent pm.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 18 50 20 32 20 48 14 38
Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 41.7% 16.7% 26.7% 16.7% 40.0% 11.7% 31.7%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 42 60 110 10 42 62 28 110
End Time (s) 60 110 10 42 62 110 42 28
Yield/Force Off (s) 56 104 5 36 58 104 36 22
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 56 84 5 20 58 90 36 5
Local Start Time (s) 52 70 0 20 52 72 38 0
Local Yield (s) 66 114 15 46 68 114 46 32
Local Yield 170(s) 66 94 15 30 68 100 46 15
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 90
Offset: 110 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Recent PM
47: Shields & Prospect Adjusted Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent pm adj timing.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 169 396 170 210 637 272 174 1057 150 221 1168 181
Future Volume (veh/h) 169 396 170 210 637 272 174 1057 150 221 1168 181
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 188 440 33 233 708 258 193 1174 50 246 1298 88
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 258 995 434 323 735 268 238 1313 570 286 1387 603
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.39 0.39
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1543 3442 2518 918 1774 3539 1536 1774 3539 1538
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 188 440 33 233 497 469 193 1174 50 246 1298 88
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1543 1721 1770 1666 1774 1770 1536 1774 1770 1538
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 12.2 1.9 7.9 33.2 33.2 7.9 37.5 1.8 10.3 42.3 4.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 12.2 1.9 7.9 33.2 33.2 7.9 37.5 1.8 10.3 42.3 4.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 258 995 434 323 516 486 238 1313 570 286 1387 603
V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.44 0.08 0.72 0.96 0.96 0.81 0.89 0.09 0.86 0.94 0.15
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 258 995 434 459 516 486 268 1313 570 308 1387 603
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.3 35.4 31.7 52.8 41.9 41.9 27.5 35.5 12.8 28.3 35.0 23.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.9 0.3 0.1 3.2 30.5 31.6 15.6 9.6 0.3 20.1 13.0 0.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 6.0 0.8 3.9 20.5 19.5 4.8 20.0 0.8 9.5 23.1 2.0
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.2 35.7 31.8 56.1 72.4 73.5 43.1 45.1 13.1 48.4 48.1 24.0
LnGrp LOS E D C E E E D D B D D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 661 1199 1417 1632
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.6 69.7 43.7 46.8
Approach LOS D E D D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 52.0 15.3 38.7 16.5 49.5 14.0 40.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 44.0 15.0 28.0 14.0 42.0 8.0 34.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.9 44.3 9.9 14.2 12.3 39.5 8.4 35.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.4 2.1 0.1 2.2 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 51.1
HCM 2010 LOS D
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Recent PM
47: Shields & Prospect Adjusted Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent pm adj timing.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 16 50 20 34 18 48 14 40
Maximum Split (%) 13.3% 41.7% 16.7% 28.3% 15.0% 40.0% 11.7% 33.3%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 44 60 110 10 44 62 30 110
End Time (s) 60 110 10 44 62 110 44 30
Yield/Force Off (s) 56 104 5 38 58 104 38 24
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 56 84 5 22 58 90 38 7
Local Start Time (s) 54 70 0 20 54 72 40 0
Local Yield (s) 66 114 15 48 68 114 48 34
Local Yield 170(s) 66 94 15 32 68 100 48 17
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 90
Offset: 110 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 TWSC Recent AM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/26/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent am.syn
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 20 1061 2 7 860
Future Vol, veh/h 6 20 1061 2 7 860
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - - 80 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 23 1234 2 8 1000
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1751 618 0 0 1236 0
Stage 1 1235 - - - - -
Stage 2 516 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 77 432 - - 559 -
Stage 1 238 - - - - -
Stage 2 564 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 76 432 - - 559 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 76 - - - - -
Stage 1 238 - - - - -
Stage 2 556 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 23.8 0 0.1
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 76 432 559 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.092 0.054 0.015 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 57.1 13.8 11.5 -
HCM Lane LOS - - F B B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 0.2 0 -
Lanes and Geometrics Recent AM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/26/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent am.syn
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 80
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 3539 0 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 3539 0 1770 3539
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 487 534 663
Travel Time (s) 11.1 9.1 11.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
HCM 2010 TWSC Recent PM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent pm.syn
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 34 1347 13 26 1522
Future Vol, veh/h 4 34 1347 13 26 1522
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - - 80 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 36 1433 14 28 1619
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2305 723 0 0 1447 0
Stage 1 1440 - - - - -
Stage 2 865 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 32 369 - - 464 -
Stage 1 184 - - - - -
Stage 2 373 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 30 369 - - 464 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 30 - - - - -
Stage 1 184 - - - - -
Stage 2 350 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 29.3 0 0.2
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 30 369 464 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.142 0.098 0.06 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 143.9 15.8 13.2 -
HCM Lane LOS - - F C B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.4 0.3 0.2 -
Lanes and Geometrics Recent PM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates recent pm.syn
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 80
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.999
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 3536 0 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 3536 0 1770 3539
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 426 740 658
Travel Time (s) 9.7 12.6 11.2
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level-of-Service Average Total Delay
sec/veh
A < 10
B > 10 and < 15
C > 15 and < 25
D > 25 and < 35
E > 35 and < 50
F > 50
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level-of-Service Average Total Delay
sec/veh
A < 10
B > 10 and < 20
C > 20 and < 35
D > 35 and < 55
E > 55 and < 80
F > 80
Table 4-3
Fort Collins (GMA and City Limits)
Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections)
Intersection type
Land Use (from structure plan)
Commercial
corridors
Other corridors within:
Mixed use
districts
Low density
mixed use
residential
All other
areas
Signalized intersections
(overall)
D E* D D
Any Leg E E D E
Any Movement E E D E
Stop sign control
(arterial/arterial,
arterial/collector or local-
any approach leg)
N/A F** F** E
Stop sign control
(collector/local--any
approach leg)
N/A C C C
* mitigating measures required
** considered normal in an urban environment
APPENDIX D
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Bkgrd AM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb am.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 251 742 157 81 244 156 57 931 139 161 681 63
Future Volume (veh/h) 251 742 157 81 244 156 57 931 139 161 681 63
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 295 873 36 95 287 64 67 1095 38 189 801 0
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 552 964 429 179 444 97 361 1550 687 305 1692 757
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.48 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1575 3442 2866 627 1774 3539 1568 1774 3539 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 295 873 36 95 175 176 67 1095 38 189 801 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1575 1721 1770 1723 1774 1770 1568 1774 1770 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.7 26.2 1.9 3.0 10.2 10.6 2.2 27.7 0.8 6.0 16.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.7 26.2 1.9 3.0 10.2 10.6 2.2 27.7 0.8 6.0 16.8 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 552 964 429 179 274 267 361 1550 687 305 1692 757
V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.91 0.08 0.53 0.64 0.66 0.19 0.71 0.06 0.62 0.47 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 552 997 444 250 418 407 414 1550 687 335 1692 757
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.4 38.7 29.8 50.8 43.6 43.7 16.2 25.1 4.8 19.6 19.4 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 11.4 0.1 2.4 2.5 2.8 0.2 2.7 0.2 3.0 1.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 14.3 0.8 1.5 5.2 5.2 1.1 14.1 0.4 3.1 8.5 0.0
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.4 50.0 29.9 53.2 46.1 46.5 16.4 27.9 5.0 22.6 20.3 0.0
LnGrp LOS DDCDDDBCACC
Approach Vol, veh/h 1204 446 1200 990
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.8 47.8 26.5 20.7
Approach LOS DDCC
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.7 57.6 9.7 35.0 12.1 53.2 22.6 22.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 45.0 7.0 30.0 10.0 42.0 11.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 18.8 5.0 28.2 8.0 29.7 10.7 12.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.7 0.1 6.7 0.2 0.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 34.2
HCM 2010 LOS C
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Bkgrd AM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb am.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 11 51 12 36 14 48 17 31
Maximum Split (%) 10.0% 46.4% 10.9% 32.7% 12.7% 43.6% 15.5% 28.2%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 89 100 41 53 89 103 72 41
End Time (s) 100 41 53 89 103 41 89 72
Yield/Force Off (s) 96 35 48 83 99 35 83 66
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96 15 48 67 99 21 83 49
Local Start Time (s) 48 59 0 12 48 62 31 0
Local Yield (s) 55 104 7 42 58 104 42 25
Local Yield 170(s) 55 84 7 26 58 90 42 8
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 110
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 90
Offset: 41 (37%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total PM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb pm.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 181 412 177 225 665 288 181 1121 156 230 1225 190
Future Volume (veh/h) 181 412 177 225 665 288 181 1121 156 230 1225 190
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 201 458 30 250 739 276 201 1246 56 256 1361 98
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 258 919 400 339 687 257 243 1328 577 296 1427 621
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.40 0.40
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1539 3442 2498 933 1774 3539 1537 1774 3539 1540
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 201 458 30 250 523 492 201 1246 56 256 1361 98
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1539 1721 1770 1662 1774 1770 1537 1774 1770 1540
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 13.2 1.8 8.5 33.0 33.0 8.4 40.7 2.0 11.8 44.7 4.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.9 13.2 1.8 8.5 33.0 33.0 8.4 40.7 2.0 11.8 44.7 4.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 258 919 400 339 487 457 243 1328 577 296 1427 621
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.50 0.08 0.74 1.08 1.08 0.83 0.94 0.10 0.86 0.95 0.16
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 258 919 400 459 487 457 293 1328 577 326 1427 621
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.5 37.8 33.5 52.6 43.5 43.5 28.8 36.1 12.6 32.2 34.7 22.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.0 0.4 0.1 4.1 62.6 63.9 15.2 13.7 0.3 19.4 15.1 0.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.8 6.5 0.8 4.2 24.5 23.2 7.5 22.4 0.9 9.8 24.7 2.2
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.6 38.2 33.6 56.7 106.1 107.4 44.0 49.9 12.9 51.6 49.8 23.4
LnGrp LOS E D C E F F D D B D D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 689 1265 1503 1715
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.9 96.8 47.7 48.5
Approach LOS D F D D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.6 53.4 15.8 36.2 18.0 50.0 14.0 38.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 44.0 15.0 26.0 16.0 42.0 8.0 32.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.4 46.7 10.5 15.2 13.8 42.7 8.9 35.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 59.9
HCM 2010 LOS E
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Total PM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb pm.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 18 50 20 32 20 48 14 38
Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 41.7% 16.7% 26.7% 16.7% 40.0% 11.7% 31.7%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 42 60 110 10 42 62 28 110
End Time (s) 60 110 10 42 62 110 42 28
Yield/Force Off (s) 56 104 5 36 58 104 36 22
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 56 84 5 20 58 90 36 5
Local Start Time (s) 52 70 0 20 52 72 38 0
Local Yield (s) 66 114 15 46 68 114 46 32
Local Yield 170(s) 66 94 15 30 68 100 46 15
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 110
Offset: 110 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Bkgrd PM
47: Shields & Prospect Adjusted Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb pm adj timing.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 181 412 177 225 665 268 181 1121 156 230 1225 190
Future Volume (veh/h) 181 412 177 225 665 268 181 1121 156 230 1225 190
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 201 458 39 250 739 258 201 1246 56 256 1361 100
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 244 977 426 340 755 264 227 1268 550 286 1386 603
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.13 0.39 0.39
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1542 3442 2551 891 1774 3539 1534 1774 3539 1538
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 201 458 39 250 513 484 201 1246 56 256 1361 100
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1542 1721 1770 1673 1774 1770 1534 1774 1770 1538
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 12.9 2.3 8.5 34.5 34.5 9.0 41.8 2.1 12.6 45.6 5.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.9 12.9 2.3 8.5 34.5 34.5 9.0 41.8 2.1 12.6 45.6 5.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 244 977 426 340 524 495 227 1268 550 286 1386 603
V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.47 0.09 0.73 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.98 0.10 0.90 0.98 0.17
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 244 977 426 473 524 495 227 1268 550 286 1386 603
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.0 36.1 32.3 52.5 41.9 41.9 31.1 38.1 13.8 34.9 36.1 23.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 20.1 0.4 0.1 3.7 33.9 35.0 31.5 21.4 0.4 28.2 20.2 0.6
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 6.3 1.0 4.2 21.7 20.7 8.5 24.2 1.0 10.6 26.0 2.3
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 75.1 36.5 32.3 56.2 75.7 76.8 62.5 59.5 14.2 63.1 56.3 24.3
LnGrp LOS E D C EEEEEBEEC
Approach Vol, veh/h 698 1247 1503 1717
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.3 72.3 58.3 55.4
Approach LOS D E E E
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 52.0 15.9 38.1 18.0 48.0 13.5 40.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 46.0 15.5 27.5 14.0 42.0 7.5 34.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.0 47.6 10.5 14.9 14.6 43.8 8.9 36.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 59.2
HCM 2010 LOS E
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Bkgrd PM
47: Shields & Prospect Adjusted Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb pm adj timing.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 14 52 20.5 33.5 18 48 13.5 40.5
Maximum Split (%) 11.7% 43.3% 17.1% 27.9% 15.0% 40.0% 11.3% 33.8%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 44 58 110 10.5 44 62 30.5 110
End Time (s) 58 110 10.5 44 62 110 44 30.5
Yield/Force Off (s) 54 104 5.5 38 58 104 38 24.5
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 54 84 5.5 22 58 90 38 7.5
Local Start Time (s) 54 68 0 20.5 54 72 40.5 0
Local Yield (s) 64 114 15.5 48 68 114 48 34.5
Local Yield 170(s) 64 94 15.5 32 68 100 48 17.5
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 110
Offset: 110 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd AM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb am.syn
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 20 1107 2 7 912
Future Vol, veh/h 6 20 1107 2 7 912
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - - 80 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 23 1287 2 8 1060
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1835 645 0 0 1290 0
Stage 1 1288 - - - - -
Stage 2 547 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 67 415 - - 533 -
Stage 1 223 - - - - -
Stage 2 544 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 66 415 - - 533 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 66 - - - - -
Stage 1 223 - - - - -
Stage 2 536 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 26.1 0 0.1
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 66 415 533 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.106 0.056 0.015 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 65.9 14.2 11.9 -
HCM Lane LOS - - F B B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 0.2 0 -
Lanes and Geometrics Short Bkgrd AM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb am.syn
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 80
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 3539 0 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 3539 0 1770 3539
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 487 534 663
Travel Time (s) 11.1 9.1 11.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb pm.syn
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 34 1424 13 26 1601
Future Vol, veh/h 4 34 1424 13 26 1601
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - - 80 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 36 1515 14 28 1703
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2429 764 0 0 1529 0
Stage 1 1522 - - - - -
Stage 2 907 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 27 346 - - 432 -
Stage 1 166 - - - - -
Stage 2 354 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 25 346 - - 432 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 25 - - - - -
Stage 1 166 - - - - -
Stage 2 331 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 33.4 0 0.2
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 25 346 432 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.17 0.105 0.064 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 176.5 16.6 13.9 -
HCM Lane LOS - - F C B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.5 0.3 0.2 -
Lanes and Geometrics Short Total PM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates sb pm.syn
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 80
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.999
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 3536 0 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 3536 0 1770 3539
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 426 740 658
Travel Time (s) 9.7 12.6 11.2
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
APPENDIX E
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total AM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st am.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 251 742 158 82 244 156 60 943 144 161 684 63
Future Volume (veh/h) 251 742 158 82 244 156 60 943 144 161 684 63
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 295 873 37 96 287 64 71 1109 43 189 805 0
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 553 964 429 180 444 97 361 1549 686 301 1685 754
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.48 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1575 3442 2866 627 1774 3539 1568 1774 3539 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 295 873 37 96 175 176 71 1109 43 189 805 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1575 1721 1770 1723 1774 1770 1568 1774 1770 1583
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.7 26.2 1.9 3.0 10.2 10.6 2.4 28.2 0.9 6.0 17.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.7 26.2 1.9 3.0 10.2 10.6 2.4 28.2 0.9 6.0 17.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 553 964 429 180 274 267 361 1549 686 301 1685 754
V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.91 0.09 0.53 0.64 0.66 0.20 0.72 0.06 0.63 0.48 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 553 997 444 250 418 407 411 1549 686 331 1685 754
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.4 38.7 29.8 50.8 43.6 43.7 16.2 25.3 4.8 19.9 19.5 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 11.4 0.1 2.4 2.5 2.8 0.3 2.9 0.2 3.3 1.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 14.3 0.8 1.5 5.2 5.2 1.2 14.3 0.4 3.2 8.5 0.0
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.4 50.0 29.9 53.2 46.1 46.5 16.4 28.2 5.0 23.1 20.5 0.0
LnGrp LOS DDCDDDBCACC
Approach Vol, veh/h 1205 447 1223 994
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.8 47.8 26.7 21.0
Approach LOS DDCC
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 57.4 9.8 35.0 12.1 53.1 22.7 22.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.0 45.0 7.0 30.0 10.0 42.0 11.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.4 19.0 5.0 28.2 8.0 30.2 10.7 12.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.7 0.1 6.6 0.2 0.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 34.2
HCM 2010 LOS C
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Total AM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st am.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 11 51 12 36 14 48 17 31
Maximum Split (%) 10.0% 46.4% 10.9% 32.7% 12.7% 43.6% 15.5% 28.2%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 89 100 41 53 89 103 72 41
End Time (s) 100 41 53 89 103 41 89 72
Yield/Force Off (s) 96 35 48 83 99 35 83 66
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96 15 48 67 99 21 83 49
Local Start Time (s) 48 59 0 12 48 62 31 0
Local Yield (s) 55 104 7 42 58 104 42 25
Local Yield 170(s) 55 84 7 26 58 90 42 8
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 110
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 90
Offset: 41 (37%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total PM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st pm.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 181 412 182 234 665 288 184 1133 161 230 1246 190
Future Volume (veh/h) 181 412 182 234 665 288 184 1133 161 230 1246 190
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 201 458 31 260 739 276 204 1259 62 256 1384 98
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 258 909 395 349 687 257 245 1321 573 296 1408 612
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.13 0.40 0.40
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1539 3442 2498 933 1774 3539 1536 1774 3539 1539
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 201 458 31 260 523 492 204 1259 62 256 1384 98
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1539 1721 1770 1662 1774 1770 1536 1774 1770 1539
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 13.3 1.8 8.8 33.0 33.0 9.1 41.5 2.3 12.0 46.4 4.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.9 13.3 1.8 8.8 33.0 33.0 9.1 41.5 2.3 12.0 46.4 4.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 258 909 395 349 487 457 245 1321 573 296 1408 612
V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.50 0.08 0.74 1.08 1.08 0.83 0.95 0.11 0.86 0.98 0.16
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 258 909 395 459 487 457 286 1321 573 323 1408 612
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 54.5 38.1 33.8 52.4 43.5 43.5 31.3 36.6 12.8 33.1 35.7 23.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.0 0.4 0.1 4.6 62.6 63.9 16.5 15.8 0.4 19.8 20.3 0.6
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.8 6.5 0.8 4.4 24.5 23.2 7.7 23.2 1.0 9.9 26.6 2.2
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.6 38.5 33.9 57.0 106.1 107.4 47.7 52.4 13.1 52.9 56.0 23.8
LnGrp LOS E D C E F F D D B D E C
Approach Vol, veh/h 690 1275 1525 1738
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.1 96.6 50.2 53.7
Approach LOS D F D D
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.3 52.7 16.2 35.8 18.2 49.8 14.0 38.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 44.0 15.0 26.0 16.0 42.0 8.0 32.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.1 48.4 10.8 15.3 14.0 43.5 8.9 35.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 62.3
HCM 2010 LOS E
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Total PM
47: Shields & Prospect City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st pm.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 18 50 20 32 20 48 14 38
Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 41.7% 16.7% 26.7% 16.7% 40.0% 11.7% 31.7%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 42 60 110 10 42 62 28 110
End Time (s) 60 110 10 42 62 110 42 28
Yield/Force Off (s) 56 104 5 36 58 104 36 22
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 56 84 5 20 58 90 36 5
Local Start Time (s) 52 70 0 20 52 72 38 0
Local Yield (s) 66 114 15 46 68 114 46 32
Local Yield 170(s) 66 94 15 30 68 100 46 15
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 110
Offset: 110 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total PM
47: Shields & Prospect Adjusted Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st pm adj timing.syn
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 181 412 182 234 665 268 184 1133 161 230 1246 190
Future Volume (veh/h) 181 412 182 234 665 268 184 1133 161 230 1246 190
Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 1 6 16 5 2 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1824 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 201 458 46 260 739 258 204 1259 62 256 1384 100
Adj No. of Lanes 221220121121
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222222222
Cap, veh/h 244 967 421 350 755 264 223 1268 550 283 1386 603
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.13 0.39 0.39
Sat Flow, veh/h 3442 3539 1542 3442 2551 891 1774 3539 1534 1774 3539 1538
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 201 458 46 260 513 484 204 1259 62 256 1384 100
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1721 1770 1542 1721 1770 1673 1774 1770 1534 1774 1770 1538
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 13.0 2.7 8.8 34.5 34.5 9.5 42.5 2.4 12.8 46.9 5.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.9 13.0 2.7 8.8 34.5 34.5 9.5 42.5 2.4 12.8 46.9 5.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 244 967 421 350 524 495 223 1268 550 283 1386 603
V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.47 0.11 0.74 0.98 0.98 0.91 0.99 0.11 0.90 1.00 0.17
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 244 967 421 473 524 495 223 1268 550 283 1386 603
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.0 36.4 32.7 52.4 41.9 41.9 32.9 38.3 13.9 35.5 36.5 23.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 20.1 0.4 0.1 4.2 33.9 35.0 37.8 23.6 0.4 29.8 23.8 0.6
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 6.4 1.2 4.4 21.7 20.7 9.0 24.8 1.1 10.7 27.5 2.3
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 75.1 36.8 32.8 56.6 75.7 76.8 70.7 61.9 14.3 65.4 60.3 24.3
LnGrp LOS E D C EEEEEBEEC
Approach Vol, veh/h 705 1257 1525 1740
Approach Delay, s/veh 47.4 72.2 61.2 59.0
Approach LOS D E E E
Timer 12345678
Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 52.0 16.2 37.8 18.0 48.0 13.5 40.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 46.0 15.5 27.5 14.0 42.0 7.5 34.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 48.9 10.8 15.0 14.8 44.5 8.9 36.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.4 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 61.2
HCM 2010 LOS E
Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Total PM
47: Shields & Prospect Adjusted Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st pm adj timing.syn
Phase Number 12345678
Movement NBL SBTL WBL EBT SBL NBTL EBL WBT
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Max None None None C-Max None None
Maximum Split (s) 14 52 20.5 33.5 18 48 13.5 40.5
Maximum Split (%) 11.7% 43.3% 17.1% 27.9% 15.0% 40.0% 11.3% 33.8%
Minimum Split (s) 11 34 11 29 11 34 11 30
Yellow Time (s) 34343444
All-Red Time (s) 12221222
Minimum Initial (s) 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10
Vehicle Extension (s) 33333333
Minimum Gap (s) 33333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 00000000
Time To Reduce (s) 00000000
Walk Time (s) 7777
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20 16 14 17
Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 44 58 110 10.5 44 62 30.5 110
End Time (s) 58 110 10.5 44 62 110 44 30.5
Yield/Force Off (s) 54 104 5.5 38 58 104 38 24.5
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 54 84 5.5 22 58 90 38 7.5
Local Start Time (s) 54 68 0 20.5 54 72 40.5 0
Local Yield (s) 64 114 15.5 48 68 114 48 34.5
Local Yield 170(s) 64 94 15.5 32 68 100 48 17.5
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 110
Offset: 110 (92%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Red
Splits and Phases: 47: Shields & Prospect
HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st am.syn
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 40 1107 4 12 912
Future Vol, veh/h 12 40 1107 4 12 912
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - - 80 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 14 47 1287 5 14 1060
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1848 646 0 0 1292 0
Stage 1 1290 - - - - -
Stage 2 558 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 66 414 - - 532 -
Stage 1 222 - - - - -
Stage 2 537 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 64 414 - - 532 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 64 - - - - -
Stage 1 222 - - - - -
Stage 2 523 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 29 0 0.2
HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 64 414 532 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.218 0.112 0.026 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 76.3 14.8 11.9 -
HCM Lane LOS - - F B B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 0.4 0.1 -
Lanes and Geometrics Short Total AM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 2/29/2016 Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st am.syn
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 80
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.999
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 3536 0 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 3536 0 1770 3539
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 487 534 663
Travel Time (s) 11.1 9.1 11.3
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st pm.syn
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 54 1424 25 61 1601
Future Vol, veh/h 10 54 1424 25 61 1601
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - - 80 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 57 1515 27 65 1703
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2509 771 0 0 1541 0
Stage 1 1528 - - - - -
Stage 2 981 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 23 343 - - 427 -
Stage 1 165 - - - - -
Stage 2 324 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 19 343 - - 427 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 19 - - - - -
Stage 1 165 - - - - -
Stage 2 275 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 67.2 0 0.5
HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 19 343 427 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.56 0.167 0.152 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - -$ 335.3 17.6 14.9 -
HCM Lane LOS - - F C B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.5 0.6 0.5 -
Lanes and Geometrics Short Total PM
2: Shields & Hobbit City Timing
Landmark Apartments Expansion 4:30 pm 8/9/2012 Landmark Apts Synchro 8 Light Report
Delich Associates st pm.syn
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12
Grade (%) 0% 0% 0%
Storage Length (ft) 0 50 0 80
Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.997
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 3529 0 1770 3539
Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 3529 0 1770 3539
Link Speed (mph) 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 426 740 658
Travel Time (s) 9.7 12.6 11.2
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
APPENDIX F
Spring Creek Trail
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
Stuart
Existing
Landmark
Apartments
Lake
Sheely
SCALE: 1"=600'
PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
Project Location Classification: Other
Description of
Applicable Destination
Area Within 1320’
Destination
Area
Classification
Level of Service (minimum based on project location classification)
Directness Continuity Street
Crossings
Visual
Interest &
Amenities
Security
Neighborhood to the
east of the site Residential
Minimum C C C C C
1 Actual A C A B A
Proposed A C A B A
Neighborhood to the
north of the site & CSU
Residential &
Institution
Minimum C C C C C
2 Actual B C A B A
Proposed B C A B A
Neighborhood to the
northwest of the site Residential
Minimum C C C C C
3 Actual A C A B A
Proposed A C A B A
Commercial area to the
west of the site Commercial
Minimum C C C C C
4 Actual A C A B A
Proposed A C A B A
Commercial area to the
southwest of the site Commercial
Minimum C C C C C
5 Actual A C A B A
Proposed A C A B A
Minimum
6 Actual
Proposed
Minimum
7 Actual
Proposed
Minimum
8 Actual
Proposed
Minimum
9 Actual
Proposed
Minimum
10 Actual
Proposed
Spring Creek Trail
Prospect
Hobbit
Shields
Stuart
Existing
Landmark
Apartments
Lake
Sheely
SCALE: 1"=600'
BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Landmark Apartments Expansion TIS, March 2016
Bicycle LOS Worksheet
Level of Service – Connectivity
Minimum Actual Proposed
Base Connectivity: C B B
Specific connections to priority sites:
Description of
Applicable Destination
Area Within 1320’
Destination
Area
Classification
Commercial area to the
1 west of the site Commercial B B B
Commercial area to the
2 southwest of the site Commercial B B B
Colorado State
3 University Institution B B B
4