HomeMy WebLinkAboutHOUSKA AUTOMOTIVE EXPANSION - BDR - BDR150010 - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS (2)1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
February 29, 2016
Linda Ripley
Ripley Design, Inc.
419 Canyon Ave
Fort Collins, CO 80521
RE: Houska Automotive Expansion, BDR150010, Round Number 2
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Clark Mapes, at 970-221-6225 or cmapes@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Responses:
Ripley Design:
Apex Engineering:
Washburn Surveying:
Vaught Frye Larson Architects:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Clark Mapes, 970-221-6225, cmapes@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: SITE PLAN: Recycle trailer parking: why not put that in a garage?
If it must be open, why is the wall 8' tall - what's the determining factor?
2/24/2016: Thank you for the answer. Is the dust inhalation something that the
public should not be responsible for? Should there be an internal
screen/capture of this? Why is it OK to externalize that. -For the meeting
Ripley Design: If the retread equipment is placed inside a building/garage it triggers massive fire
concerns. There is minimal dust created by the equipment and we have selected a product that
includes HEPA filters to limit it even more. The main concern was noise. To mitigate the noise the
equipment will come with a “silencer” and the screen wall will be built with concrete masonry with a
high sound attenuation rating. The screen wall/enclosure will be 18’ tall to sufficiently screen all
equipment from view.
2
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/24/2016: Please clearly delineate the emergency access easement and
access easement done by separate document and the emergency access
easement and utility easement done by plat. See redlines.
Apex Engineering: Additional clarification has been added to the Overall Utility Plan (sheet C4).
12/16/2015: Please clearly define what portions of the 20' Emergency Access
Easement are being dedicated by the plat and by separate document on the
Utility Plans.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/24/2016: Add note to Grading Plan-Phase 1 sheet about utility phasing
being constructed with Phase 1 to the Phase 2 sheet. Also, see redlines for
notes to adjust on the Phase 2 Grading Plan Sheet.
Apex Engineering: The grading plan has been broken out into Phase 1 (C5) and Phase 2 (C6).
Additional notes have also been added to clarify the phasing.
12/16/2015: The planning objectives state that all utility, stormwater systems
and driveway accesses will be completed with Phase 1. Please list all utilities
and infrastructure that will be completed in Phase 1 in the Utility Plan. A note or
table can be added to the Interim Grading Plan. Show that there will be two
phases on this sheet.
Apex Engineering: A table is not needed, since ALL public water, sewer and drainage
Improvements are being constructed with Phase one, as shown in the utility plans and in the notes.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/24/2016: Where is detail D-10C being used? Is it proposed on site?
Apex Engineering: This detail has been replaced with D-10. These are being used for private curb
cuts for drainage from the parking area into the pond.
12/16/2015: Change Detail 709 to D-10B instead. The City no longer uses this
deatail for a sidewalk chase.
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: Include the other information of the legal description on the Utility
Plans. See redlines.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: Provide dimensions for all easements.
Apex Engineering: Dimensions have been provided where possible.
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: Match all individual sheet titles to the drawing index on the cover
sheet.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
3
Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: Label curb and gutter Detail S2 as on Site Only (Sheet C11)
Apex Engineering: A note to that effect has been added to the detail.
Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: Use LCUASS details for curb, gutter and sidewalk instead of
Stormwater Detail D-6.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 02/25/2016
02/25/2016: Please submit a variance request for the driveway spacing.
Apex Engineering: This will be submitted separately.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
02/24/2016: The easement configurations on the Utility Plans do not match
what is shown on the Plat. The emergency access easement may interfere with
the landscape island. Please see redlines.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
12/17/2015: It appears that the existing Emergency Access Easement on Lot 1
is in the incorrect location. It is being depicted as being next to the property line,
however, there is a landscape area between the lot line and easement. This
easement can't be vacated by the plat until new emergency access is
constructed. This will need to be done by separate document.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/09/2015
02/19/2016: It does not appear that Fixture A was updated to the 3000K
version on the photometric plan - please update.
Ripley Design: Updated.
12/09/2015: Will any additional lighting be provided on site? If so, please
provide a photometric plan and specifications for the light fixtures that will be
used. In regard to LED light fixtures, cooler color temperatures are harsher at
night and cause more disruption to circadian rhythms for both humans and
wildlife. Please consider a warmer color temperature (closer to 2700K), as well
as dimming capabilities, for any LED light fixtures.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/19/2016
02/19/2016: Please provide cut-sheet information for light fixture B.
Ripley Design: Cut-sheet provided on lighting plan
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
4
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
In place of the Lindens used in parking lot areas Honeylocust could be better
adapted to these locations that are dryer and exposed.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
Provide 20 upsized mitigation trees. The Hackberry are upsized but other trees
will also need to be upsized.
Shade Trees 3.0 inch caliper
Ornamental Trees 2.5 inch caliper
For the bigtooth maple consider specifying them as 6-8 foot clump or
equivalent.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
The first Hackberry from the curb cut is too close to the Sewer line (10 feet
separation needed) and may cause some site distance conflict. It appears this
tree will not work at this location and should be eliminated.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
Show locations of any street lights and if needed provide the tree separations
that meet the LUC standard LUC 3.2.1 K.
40 feet for Shade trees
15 feet for ornamental trees
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
List the percentage of trees used and adjust quantities to meet the minimum
species diversity standard in LUC 3.2.1 D 3. Hackberry is 50% of the trees but
will need to be reduced to 33%. Consider changing 3 or 4 of the Hackberry
along Riverside to Bur Oak.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/15/2015
12/15/2015: Please schedule a pre-submittal meeting for this project.
Pre-Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the
design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to
complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The
proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to
be effective. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects should email
scarter@fcgov.com to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be
prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to
5
discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction
being proposed.
Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/12/2016
02/12/2016: Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as
amended:
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the
fcgov.com/building web page to view them.
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use
1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC.
2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential
chapter.
3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial
chapter.
Vaught Frye Larson Architects: Acknowledged.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Coy Althoff, , CAlthoff@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Light & Power has primary cable with 3-phase capability running
along both the West and South sides of the property lines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site
charges and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this
development. Please reference our policies, development charge processes,
and use our fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: For commercial services: Please provide a one line diagram and
a C-1 form to Light and Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1Form.pdf
6
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the
transformer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility
plans. Pad mount transformers must be no more than 10' from a paved surface,
have 8' clearance from the front and 3' clearance around the back and sides.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Streetlights will be placed along public streets. A 40 feet
separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and
streetlights. A 15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between
ornamental trees and streetlights.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any
questions at 221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge
processes, and use our fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: No changes or additions on behalf of Light & Power since the last
review.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/28/2016
02/28/2016: FIRE LINE
The utility plan shows the incoming fire line into Building 1 schedule to be 4". 6'
is typically the standard unless fire flow calculations support a reduction to a 4" line.
Apex Engineering: This has been changed to 6 inches.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Drainage easement shown doesn’t match the one shown on the
plat.
Apex Engineering: The plat is updated accordingly.
Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Clarify the extents of the bioswale with a hatch for the footprint of
the bioswale. Also, please clarify if the bioswale is present north of the drive
aisle (adjacent to the water quality pond.)
Apex Engineering: The bioswale has been removed from the plan. Two rain gardens are now
Proposed for LID treatment. The existing bioswale north of the access road will remain in place.
Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The Site Plan indicates rain gardens in two locations but the Utility
Plans indicate only one. Please coordinate/verify.
7
Apex Engineering: The Utility Plans show the correct number of rain gardens (two).
Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Slope labels and spot elevations need to be added in some
locations. See redlines.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The grading plan shows a low point at the very southeast corner of
the site. Is this channelized flow that is being directed to the offsite parking lot?
This needs to be detailed somehow. Are you proposing a curb cut, or chase of
some sort?
Apex Engineering: A private area drain basin has been added to this area.
Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The Interim Grading Plan is the first phase of grading and will need
to include certify items like the detention pond, bioswale, rain garden(s), etc.
The design info for these items should be included on the Interim Grading Plan
and detailed on that sheet, not the Phase 2 sheet. The Phase 2 sheet should
then only include grading that is slated to occur with that phase.
Apex Engineering: The grading plans have been reorganized to show phase 1 and phase 2
more clearly.
Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: What are the slopes within the temporary parking lot? Please
hatch or somehow indicate which portion of the parking lot is temporary, like you
did with the Temp Gravel Surface area.
Apex Engineering: The temporary parking area is hatched on the Phase 1 grading plan.
Addition grading information is now shown in this area.
Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Storm Pipe 2 and 3 profile indicates that there is no slope from the
flat top manhole junction to the existing pipe. Please revise.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Storm Pipe 4 profile indicates that the invert of the outlet structure
is lower than the tie-in elevation to the inlet. The profile also indicates that the
invert of the outlet structure is lower than the pond grading shows. Please
revise.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The outlet structure will need to be designed by you, not others.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 53 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The detail sheets include a standard manhole, but I don’t know
where this is being proposed to be installed. Please remove if you’re not using
it.
8
Apex Engineering: That detail has been removed.
Comment Number: 54 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Detail D-10C should be replaced with Detail D-10.
Apex Engineering: Detail D-10 has been added.
Comment Number: 55 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Detail D-17 Headwalls for Pipes is included but I don’t know
where this is being proposed to be installed. Please remove if not using it.
Apex Engineering: That detail has been removed.
Comment Number: 56 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Include a detail of the outlet structure once its designed.
Apex Engineering: That detail has been added.
Topic: Drainage Report
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Complete detention pond information needs to be included on the
drainage plan: water surface elevations for the WQCV and the 100-yr event,
volume of the pond, release rates, etc.
Apex Engineering: These have been added, although there is no release rate shown since ‘
there is no detention proposed.
Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please clarify the extents of Basin Q3. It looks to be much larger
than 0.249 acres.
Apex Engineering: As per our discussions regarding this, Rain Garden 2 is sized for a
certain sized drainage basin. This basin is now called Q2, and is .29 acres in size.
Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There is a basin at the southern edge of the property that drains
offsite. The extents of this basin need to be shown and quantified and it needs
to be analyzed (runoff calculations) in your report.
Apex Engineering: The runoff in this area is collected by a newly proposed drain basin
in this area . There is now no developed runoff draining off-site.
Comment Number: 43 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Bioswale 1 is also taking run-on from the Houska site to the west –
what is that run-on area and what is the resulting ratio?
Apex Engineering: This bioswale is proposed as a rain garden. The runoff from the existing
Houska site is shown as basin number 5 in the Houska South drainage report. There is 1.00
acres draining from this area. The rain garden is sized for this off-site flow and 0.41 acres of new
area from the new development
Comment Number: 44 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Does the entire building roof for Bldgs 1 and 2 drain toward the
north and east?
Apex Engineering: Yes, the both buildings drain towards this area.
Comment Number: 45 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Per the email correspondence dated 2-2-2016, the LID
9
requirement can be reduced by the amount of LID treatment located within the
regional water quality pond footprint, however, you’re still showing a bio-swale in
that location. Perhaps the bio-swale should be truncated to only be located
along the easterly side of Bldg 2.
Apex Engineering: The regional conveyance does not allow a bioswale in that area. A
HDPE drainage system is proposed for that area now.
Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The grading and drainage plans should show an approximate pipe
alignment under the adjacent drive way to the east for the master plan
improvements. The alignment and invert should be approximated and the water
quality pond should be designed to accommodate this approximate design.
Apex Engineering: The new conveyance pipes are shown on the revised drawings.
Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Complete detention pond information needs to be included on the
drainage plan: water surface elevations for the WQCV and the 100-yr event,
volume of the pond, release rates, etc.
Apex Engineering: There is no detention proposed. I have added a table summarizing
The LIDs.
Comment Number: 48 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Urban Drainage spreadsheets can’t be used for calculating runoff
because we utilize different rainfall data. Please put together your own
spreadsheets for calculating runoff.
Apex Engineering: Spreadsheets based on Fort Collins methods is now included in the
drainage report.
Comment Number: 49 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: • Discussion of certain bullet points included in the email
regarding Houska, dated 2/2/2016, need to be included in the report.
Specifically:
• The City will acquire the portion of the area previously allocated to
detention for regional extended detention and an area for conveyance through
the site. The City will either acquire that portion of the property or ask for an
easement that encompasses the regional water quality pond.
• Stormwater will assist in modifying the Masterplan modeling to verify
detention is not needed. Please state that the City of Fort Collins Stormwater
Utility has reviewed the model and has verified that onsite detention is not
needed at this site because this sites storm event peaks well before the system
that this site ties into.
• Extended detention for the development will be accomplished within the
regional pond. Please rephrase this to say “regional water quality pond”.
• In general, the City acquisition will be offset by the proportional amount of
volume needed for the Houska development vs. the regional volume. “Volume”
is “water quality capture volume or WQCV”.
• The City will pay for the design, construction and other costs associated
with the regional pond. The City’s preference is to handle that with a
reimbursement to Houska. This doesn’t need to be included in the drainage
report narrative.
• The development will still need to meet LID standards. We are pursuing
the 75% treatment/no pavers criteria. This needs to be discussed/clarified in
10
the narrative of the report.
• The LID requirement will be offset by the amount of LID treatment lost to
regional pond infrastructure needs (specifically the bioswale along the north and
east property lines needed for regional conveyance). This also needs to be
discussed/clarified in the narrative of the report.
Apex Engineering: Those points have been included in the revised report.
Comment Number: 50 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Discuss standard water quality provisions and LID water quality
treatment requirements. Discuss percentages (standard vs LID) provided at
your site and how the regional water quality pond requires a reduction in LID
provisions.
Apex Engineering: Discussion added to the report.
Comment Number: 51 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: For the raingarden calculations, please just use the UD BMP
spreadsheet to calculate the raingarden WQCV and footprint requirements.
This spreadsheet can be downloaded directly from their website.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 52 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please provide a design for the outlet structure for the pond. The
analysis of this needs to be included in the report. The outlet structure needs to
be sized and drawn to scale in the drawings and a detail of the outlet structure
also needs to be included in the plans.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
02/23/2016: The rain garden will need to be in a drainage easement.
The proposed curb stops need to be in a utility easement that is dedicated on
the plat
12/14/2015: Plat
- Drainage easements will be needed for the extended detention pond and also
for any other volume-based LID feature on the site.
- The proposed water meters need to be in a utility easement that is dedicated
on the plat.
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/08/2015
02/19/2016: Page 11 needs a change to the site name as it appears to be
from an old template in the Erosion Control Report. Erosion Control Escrow will
need to be calculated and submitted. 01/20/2016: Current Erosion Control
Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control
Plan (based upon comments from emails from 1/20/2016 and an Escrow /
Security Calculation. Also as a heads up, based upon the area of disturbance
State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre. If
you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any
11
questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @
jschlam@fcgov.com
Apex Engineering: Page 11 has been revised as requested. An erosion control escrow
calculation
Is included is included in the appendix of the ESC report.
12/08/2015: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and
Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. The erosion control
requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of
Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials
Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan
(Needs a Sequence Chart), Erosion Control Report (Was not submitted or was
not routed), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Was not submitted or was not
routed). Also, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater
will be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification
concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please
contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtaylor@fcgov.com
Topic: Floodplain
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: On the Site Plan, Grading Plans (Phase 1 and Phase 2), and
anywhere else applicable; please label the distance between the buiding
corners and the floodplain boundary. We will require that these building corners
be staked in the field prior to construction to insure that the building is not
located in the 100-year floodplain.
Apex Engineering: These have been added to the Grading Plans (sheets C5 and C6).
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: Please remove the "Legal Description", and add "Located in the
Northeast...State of Colorado" back on the sheet.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
12/16/2015: Please remove the "Legal Description" & other crossed out text
as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: This is not correct. Please make changes as marked. See
redlines.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
12/16/2015: Please provide the following information in the EXACT format
12
shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL
DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29
UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE,
THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED
= NAVD88 - X.XX¿.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
12/16/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Some of the titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the
noted sheets. See redlines.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched
areas. See redlines.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: These were not received.
Washburn Surveying: emailed
12/16/2015: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the
aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at
jcounty@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Are there any Lienholders for this property? If so, please add a
signature block. If not, please add a note stating there are none, and include
13
response in written comments.
Washburn Surveying: according to Title Commitment there are no Lienholders
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There are spelling issues with some text. See redlines.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please use larger text on the major street names and the word
"Site" in the vicinity map. See redlines.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate
document must be added prior to mylars.
Washburn Surveying: Documents submitted to the City, will be on mylars
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: What are the extents of the Public Access portion of the 20'
Emergency Access And Public Access Easement? See redlines.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please add bearings, distances, and/or curve data as marked.
See redlines.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please make the floodway boundary line darker.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please add dedication information for all street rights of way. See
redlines.
Washburn Surveying: We can find no definitive record of Riverside dedication.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Lot 1 can not be 2.490 Acres with right of way being dedicated.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please label the sq. ft./acreage of the right of way being
dedicated.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please show right of way lines as a solid line. See redlines.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please label all surrounding properties with "Unplatted" or the
subdivision name. This includes properties across right of ways. See redlines.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
Department: Traffic Operation
14
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
02/24/2016: Work with engineering on whether an access spacing modification
request is needed.
Apex Engineering: A variance request for driveway spacing will be provided to
Engineering.
12/17/2015: Are access spacing requirements met between the two access
points?
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
02/26/2016: Thanks for forwarding the sheets. The striping plan looks pretty
good. The existing striping on the east end is different than what is shown on
the plans (the left turn bay is longer), so the tie in will occur at about the
Albertson's driveway entrance. You'll need to work carefully with our department
on work area traffic control plans for the installation.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
02/24/2016: Can I get a plan sheet detailing the proposed Riverside striping?
My submittal only had the first 3 sheets. We need to fully understand the typical
section, lane widths, and minimum lane locations (pinch points) before signing
off on the re-striping.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
12/17/2015: The re-striping along Riverside is shown as 10 ft lanes and a 10.5
min outside lane (next to curb). We indicated in our joint meeting that we need
to have at least 10 ft of asphalt in the outside lane, not including the pan. It is
unclear whether this is what is shown.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: A landscape plan shall contain accurate and identifiable
hydrozones, including a water budget chart that shows the total annual water
use, which shall not exceed fifteen (15) gallons per square foot over the site. If
you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6704.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation
requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please clarify with notes what is intended to be installed with
15
Phase 2 – such as SOI’s or meter pits, etc.
Apex Engineering: ALL public water, sewer and drainage is being proposed for construction with
Phase 1.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Sewer service to Bldg 2 needs to tap directly into the sewer main,
not the manhole.
Apex Engineering: The service has been moved.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Why do you have the 1” domestic water service north and the fire
service south for Bldg 3?
Apex Engineering: Both services have been moved to the south side of building 3.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please ensure that there is 5’ horizontal separation between water
services and/or water/fire services.
Apex Engineering: As discussed, 4’ of separation is being proposed.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There are some lines drawn on the Overall Utility Plan that I can’t
identify.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: See redlines for other minor comments.
Apex Engineering: Acknowledged.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
02/24/2016: This still has not been corrected.
Washburn Surveying: addressed
12/14/2015: On the plat please change the planning signature block to match
the signature block on the site plan set.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: What is happens in southwest corner of the site?
Ripley Design: Hatch added to show where proposed asphalt ties into existing.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: The parking spaces where there is not curb and gutter require
wheel stops.
Ripley Design: Existing wheel stops will remain, noted on plans.