HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOLLEGE EIGHT THIRTY - PDP - PDP150019 - CORRESPONDENCE -Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
October 02, 2015
Craig Russell
Russell + Mills Studios
141 S. College Ave Ste 104
Fort Collins, CO 80524
RE: College Eight Thirty, PDP150019, Round Number 1
Comment Summary:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
09/22/2015: Please provide staff with a material board that contains samples of the
proposed materials. Staff is concerned with the quality of the materials shown at
the ground level in particular.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/22/2015
09/30/2015: Staff agrees with the Landmark Preservation Commission's
recommendations provided at their worksession on September 28th. A solider
course or other horizontal element that relates to the Scott Building would improve
the project's compatibility with surrounding historic resources. Increased greenery
and landscaping along Locust would also contribute positively to the project's
compatibility. Please also explore alternatives to the flat roof elements.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Topic: General
09/15/2015: Comment from GIS - Projects with three or more tenant units require
the Unit Level Addressing form to be completed and submitted to the GIS
Department once plans have met final approval through Development Review and
are recorded with the City. This can occur anytime during construction, but before
any utilities or address signs are installed. All addressing will be determined by the
GIS Department and submitted to Poudre Fire Authority, USPS, Building Services,
and Fort Collins Utilities. Failure to contact GIS and determining addresses through
other means may result in address changes.
The Unit Level Addressing form can be obtained by contacting the GIS office at
gis@fcgov.com or (970) 416-2483.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/15/2015
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for
your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may
contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at
970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com.
Page 1 of 11
09/22/2015: How many square feet will the commercial use be? The vehicle and
bike parking required for this project will change depending on the amount of
commercial use you are proposing.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/22/2015
09/22/2015: Similar to the previous comment, the amount of commercial will impact
the setback requirements along College and Locust. If this is a true mixed-use
project, the setback standards in 3.5.3 will apply. This means you would need a
modification to achieve the 9' setback along College. According to LUC section
3.5.3(C)(2), the minimum setback for mixed-use buildings along an arterial is 10'. If
this is a multi-family project, the setback standards in 3.8.30(E)(3) would apply.
This would require a minimum 15' setback on College and a 9' setback on Locust.
In this instance, you would require a modification to both setbacks and staff would
be unlikely to support that modification request.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/22/2015
Topic: Landscape Plans
09/25/2015: There is no interior landscaping shown for the parking area. 6% of the
interior of the interior space of the parking lot is required to be landscaped per Land
Use Code section 3.2.2(M)(1). Please submit a modification request to this
standard.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/25/2015
09/29/2015: The tree mitigation legend on the Landscape Plan is confusing. The
legend doesn't show any trees that will be removed as part of this development plan
yet the plan calls for 3 mitigation trees. Will the existing Swamp White Oak be
removed or will it be protected?
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Topic: Site Plan
09/25/2015: The site plan shows 27 parking spaces, which is 2 spaces short of the
minimum required per Land Use Code 3.2.2(K)(1)(a)(1). You will require more
parking given that the first floor will have commercial uses as well. Please provide a
modification request to this standard or show how the proposed site plan meets the
code via the alternative compliance strategies outlined in 3.2.2(K)(1)(a)(1)(a).
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/25/2015
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
09/30/2015: The permeable pavers shown would need to stop 5 feet short of the
alley right-of-way (and specify the use of a concrete cut-off wall and associated
details at time of final plan).
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: The edge of alley pavement and its relation to the right-of-way line
along with the proposed site improvements illustrating how everything ties in
together is unclear. Further information is needed which depending on the amount of
impact to the alley, may require additional alley pavement improvements than what
is currently specified. Is the undergrounding of utilities indicated along the alley
occurring under alley pavement?
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: The existing access ramp at Locust and College would need to be
reconfigured with truncated dome detection.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Page 2 of 11
Topic: General
09/30/2015: The plans show with a dashed line that the building is overhanging onto
right-of-way for both Locust Street and the alley. The design of the building should
not have portions of the building extending into right-of-way.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: The plans show doors swinging open that would encroach onto Locust
Street right-of-way. The design should be modified to either recess the doors to
ensure doors swinging open remain on private property, or the doors (if building
code allowed) swing into the building as opposed to out of the building.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: Tom Knostman, Pavement Manager for City Streets is looking to
reduce the amount of concrete being provided, from the back of curb along College
Avenue to the access ramp directing across Locust. This concrete wouldn't appear
to be needed with pedestrians not being directed to the west across College
Avenue, and it additional affords more area in which snow clearing operations along
College Avenue could utilize without clearing snow onto sidewalks.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: In addition to potentially less concrete west of the existing ramp, it
seems that less concrete east of the ramp could also occur, which would match the
feel of the sidewalk system to the south.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: The placement of sidewalk along Locust is narrowing the amount of
detachment and reducing the parkway that's been established in the surrounding
area (to the east and to the south). The sidewalk should maintain the same
alignment that's been established east of the alley.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: The proposed sight distance easement shown should be dedicated as
right-of-way (a 10' x 10' triangle) in accordance with 7-11F/12F. Regardless of
whether this area is sight distance or right-of-way, the placement of bike racks with
associated bike parking is problematic in this area and the bike parking should be
shown outside of this area.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: The landscape wall along College Avenue sidewalk should be set back
2 feet from the back of walk in accordance with Figure 16-1 of LCUASS.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: The landscape plan shows pre-cast planters in the Locust Street
right-of-way and appears to specify them as water quality planters. The civil plans
do not reflect this. The placement of planters in the right-of-way would be an
encroachment that should be outside of right-of-way, and if they are needed to meet
a water quality requirement, it is of further concern that it's shown in right-of-way on
the landscape plan.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Topic: Plat
09/30/2015: Shouldn't the plat be calling out the lot created with the replat as Lot 1,
instead of Lot 6?
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015: With the right-of-way dedication for the 10' x 10' triangle the plat
language for dedication should be the standard language, not limiting conveyance to
just easements.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Page 3 of 11
09/30/2015: Does the transformer shown on the property just west of the alley
right-of-way need to be in an easement?
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcgov.com
Topic: General
09/16/2015: Our city has an established identity as a forward-thinking community
that cares about the quality of life it offers its citizens and has many sustainability
programs and goals that may benefit your project. Of particular interest may be the:
1. ClimateWise program: http://www.fcgov.com/climatewise/
2. Zero Waste Plan and the Waste Reduction and Recycling Assistance Program
(WRAP):
http://www.fcgov.com/recycling/pdf/_20120404_WRAP_ProgramOverview.pdf,
contact Caroline Mitchell at 970-221-6288 or cmtichell@fcgov.com
3. Green Building and the Climate Action Plan:
http://www.fcgov.com/enviro/green-building.php, contact Tony Raeker at
970-416-4238 or traeker@fcgov.com
4. Nature in the City Strategic Plan: http://www.fcgov.com/planning/natureinthecity/?
key=advanceplanning/natureinthecity/, contact Lindsay Ex at 970-221-6767 or
lex@fcgov.com
Please consider the City’s sustainability goals and ways for your development to
engage with these efforts.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/16/2015
Topic: Landscape Plans
09/16/2015: How tall will the "vine fence" be? Will it be irrigated?
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/16/2015
Topic: Lighting Plan
09/16/2015: Detailed specifications for the light fixtures that will be used will be
requried at the time of Final Plans. In regard to LED light fixtures, cooler color
temperatures are harsher at night and cause more disruption to circadian rhythms
for both humans and wildlife. Please consider a warmer color temperature (closer to
2700K) for your LED light fixtures.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/16/2015
Department: Historical Preservation
Contact: Katie Dorn, , kdorn@fcgov.com
Topic: General
09/30/2015:
The Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) met on September 28, 2015 at a
Work Session to review this Preliminary/Conceptual development proposal.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Page 4 of 11
09/30/2015:
"LUC 3.4.7(F)(2): New structures shall be designed to be in character with such
existing historic structures. Horizontal elements, such as cornices, windows,
moldings and sign bands, shall be aligned with those of such existing historic
structures to strengthen the visual ties among buildings. Window patterns of such
existing structures (size, height, number) shall be repeated in new construction, and
the pattern of the primary building entrance facing the street shall be maintained to
the maximum extent feasible."
In order to comply with 3.4.7(F)(2), the following suggestion was made by LPC:
Consider a soldier course or row lock brick pattern that ties into the horizontal
elements expressed in the Fort Collins Landmark, "Scott Apartments," across
Locust Street to the proposed development.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015:
The LPC made general comments regarding proportions:
The step down height works well, the LPC was comfortable with the proportions of
the building that it was broken down well and addresses compatibility with the
neighborhood and Scott Apartment building.
The LPC made general comments regarding the gable roof portion:
LPC thought that the roof forms speak to the residential nature of the historic district.
Consider adding craftsman elements to the gable roof, for example, exposed rafter
ends.
The LPC made general comments regarding the flat roofs:
Take a second look at these to soften them by using a design element, such as
parapeting, or explain why you decided to keep them as is.
The LPC made general comments regarding materials:
LPC thought that the brick material is compatible with the adjacent Fort Collins
Landmark, Scott Apartments.
The LPC made general comments regarding windows:
The proportion of stair tower is successful, but take a second look at the patterning.
The windows on the east portion of the building correctly borrow elements from the
adjacent building and residential neighborhood.
The LPC made general suggestions regarding greenery:
Provide landscape plan with the next submittal.
The LPC made general suggestions regarding setbacks:
Provide a drawing that shows the dimensions of the setbacks of the proposed
development compared to the setbacks of the Fort Collins Landmark, Scott
Apartments.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
09/30/2015:
Contact Karen McWilliams, at kmcwilliams@fcgov.com, to schedule the Final
Review and Recommendation to Decision Maker of this development proposal with
the LPC.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Page 5 of 11
09/28/2015:
Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting:
Pre-Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early
on in the design,
that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of
the adopted City
codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to
mid-design stage for
this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning
conceptual review
meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call
416-2341 to schedule
a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor
plans, and elevations
and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of
construction being proposed.
Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended:
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com
web page to view them.
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use
1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC.
2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter.
3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter.
830 – project specific concerns:
1. Fire-sprinkler systems are required. A new code amendment effective in 2014 will
require a full NFPA-13 sprinkler system and not allow a 13-R system.
2. Bedroom egress windows required below 4th floor regardless of fire-sprinkler.
3. All windows above the 1st floor require minimum sill height of 24”
4. Building code and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide accessible
units.
5. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling.
6. Exterior walls and roof must meet a STC (sound resistance) rating of 40 min. if
building located within 1000ft to train tracks.
7. Low-flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are
required.
8. Special combustion safety requirements for natural draft gas appliances.
9. Low VOC interior finishes.
10. The wall closer than 3ft to north property line must be a 1-hour wall with no
openings (windows/doors). Wall also requires a parapet.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/28/2015
Page 6 of 11
City of Fort Collins
Building Services
Plan Review
416-2341
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund@fcgov.com
Topic: General
09/29/2015: Will 3 phase power be needed for the commercial/retail space?
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please gang the electric meters on one side of the building for the
residential units. Electric meter gangs shall be separated from the gas meters.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Electric Capacity Fees, Building Site charges and any system
modification charges necessary will apply to this development
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you
have any questions at 416-2772. Please reference our policies, development
charge processes, and use our fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
10/02/2015: A commercial service information form (C1 form) and a one line
diagram for the commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to Light
and Power Department. C1 form can be found at the below link:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-forms
-guidelines-regulations
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/02/2015
10/02/2015: A digital copy of the AutoCAD drawings will need to be submitted to
Light and Power once the plans are approved.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/02/2015
10/02/2015: Light & Power will need the following documentation before electric
design can start. Approved SIte plan, plat, Landscape drawings and one line
diagram.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/02/2015
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com
Topic: General
09/16/2015: Comment from Xcel - Max gas pressure is 14" WC.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/16/2015
Page 7 of 11
09/23/2015: Comment from Larimer County - My review comments are within the
Subtitle of the Plat and also in the Statement of Ownership and Subdivision. Right
now the prelim has for the subtitle, Lot 6, Block 128 FTC, in the Southeast quarter
section 12, Twn 7, Range 69. Please correct this to the Northwest quarter section
13-7-69.
Lot 6, Block 123, City Fort Collins... Please correct to Block 128, FTC, Northwest
quarter section 13 in the statement of subdivision.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/23/2015
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
09/17/2015: FIRE ACCESS
The location of the building footprint and overall building height place the building out
of both general fire access (access to within 150' to all exterior portions of the
building) and aerial fire access (30' wide fire lane located no farther than 30' from the
building). Fire access cannot be measured from arterial roads or alleys. Although
the building is not a high rise by definition, site limitations and building dimensions
create many of the same access challenges during emergency operations that are
inherent in taller buildings. Even if the project is unable to meet the prescriptive
requirements of the International Fire Code, it will still need to meet the intent of the
code. As such, fire department approval will be based upon the project team taking
a hard look at the high rise provisions of the 2012 IFC and presenting a plan to the
fire marshal for review and approval which incorporates appropriate measures to
ensure occupant life safety and resolve firefighter operational concerns. Possible
alternatives may include (but may not be limited to) adding areas of refuge, roof
access for both stairwells, hose connections on the roof, additional fire separation
within the building, pressurized stairwells, etc. Feel free to contact me for additional
input or guidance. Code language provided below.
> FIRE LANES
IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building or
portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction.
The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section
and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the
exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the building or facility. When any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150
feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code official is authorized to increase the
dimension if the building is equipped throughout with an approved, automatic
fire-sprinkler system.
> AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS - PROXIMITY TO BUILDING
IFC D105.3: At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall
be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building,
and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the
building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be
approved by the fire code official.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/17/2015
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Dan Mogen, , dmogen@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Page 8 of 11
09/29/2015: The existing site and historical stormwater fees paid have been
investigated and it has been determined that water quantity detention is not required
at this time.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please break the site down into subbasins to show what areas are
being treated by what LID measure. An LID table would be helpful (please email
dmogen@fcgov.com for a sample if desired). Water quality is required for 100% of
the site so if there are areas that are draining undetained, these will need to be
identified and explained.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: It appears there is a discrepancy between the water quality planter
locations called out on the Utility Plans and Landscape Plans. Please review for
consistency.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Will water quality planters be permitted in the right of way? This needs
to be coordinated for approval with the Engineering Department. The planters will
need to be in an easement if they are not located within the ROW.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please modify the water quality planter detail (shown on Sheet LS501)
to be consistent with the proposed bioretention. Please include a volume for
ponding at the top (calculated thru spreadsheet available from Urban Drainage),
bioretention media mix at least 12” in depth, pea gravel at least 4” in depth, and #57
washed rock at least 4” in depth. Filter fabric is not to be used in the bioretention
cross section.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please show that the water quality planters are in compliance with
drain times per Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602(8).
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
09/29/2015: Saw comment will wait for FDP for Erosion control requirements. The
site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control
Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the
Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section
1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements.
Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow /
Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are
any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @
jschlam@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
09/29/2015: No comments.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Topic: Construction Drawings
09/29/2015: Please make changes to the sub-title as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Page 9 of 11
09/29/2015: The elevation for benchmark 28-92 does not match what was
published in 2013. Please verify.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Sheet C200 is numbered as C100. See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Topic: Landscape Plans
09/29/2015: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Topic: Lighting Plan
09/29/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Topic: Plat
09/29/2015: Please make changes to the sub-title as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please make changes to the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision
as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please add new title commitment information as available.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Please explain the need for the vertical component of the Sight
Distance Easement.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Topic: Site Plan
09/29/2015: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: Sheet LS001 is numbered as LS100. See redlines.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
09/29/2015: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas.
See redlines.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Page 10 of 11
09/30/2015: Something to keep in mind is ensuring adequate sight distance in the
alley to the parking area, and from the alley onto Locust (potentially removing a
parking spot on Locust). We can work on this during final.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
09/24/2015: Perovskia Atriplicifolia (Russian Sage) has been removed from the City
of Fort Collins Plant List. Please replace with a plant variety from the current list. If
you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6704.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/24/2015
09/24/2015: The overall water budget for the property appears to need adjusting.
Please confirm water use values of landscape demands with overall landscape
area. If you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or
970-221-6704.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/24/2015
09/24/2015: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit.
The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of
the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/24/2015
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Dan Mogen, , dmogen@fcgov.com
Topic: General
09/29/2015: Please see redlines.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/29/2015
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avandeutekom@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Topic: Site Plan
09/30/2015: It's still unclear if you are meeting the parking requirements. Are these
rent by the bedroom? Also, the commercial square footage on the first floor will need
to be listed. You will have parking requirements for the commercial use.
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/30/2015
Page 11 of 11