Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSALUD FAMILY HEALTH CENTER - ODP - ODP150003 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - REVISIONSland planning  landscape architecture  urban design  entitlement March 8, 2016 Jason Holland City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Salud Family Health Center, ODP150003, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comment responses. If you have any questions regarding the responses please contact Stephanie Van Dyken, Ripley Design Inc., 224-5828 Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: All of the plans must show more context around the perimeter of the property, including surrounding buildings, property lines, right of ways, private streets and existing easements. Label ex. and proposed Maple Street. Response: Context has been added. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: How will the proposed street connection to Maple Street be made? It appears that only 45 feet of property is available to make the tie-in. Label the width proposed width of the conceptual right of way. Response: Maple Street will be necked down if Lot 5 is developed until right of way can be acquired from the property to the south in order to keep the centerline aligned. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: Lot 6 needs to show more clearly how access will be provided in a way that could make this a legal lot, or it could be added to Lot 4 for now or perhaps shown as a tract with the PDP? Also, to carve out this area, it appears that two access points will be need so that the access does not exceed 660 feet. Response: Lot 6 will be accessed by a private drive and from the west by a public street. Salud ODP – Comment Responses 3/8/2016 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: See redlines for connection and trail comments. Response: Redlines have been corrected. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Sexton, 970-221-6501, ksexton@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: Please add the following notes to the ODP: The exact location and type of access points onto lots will be determined at the time of PDP submittals. Location of access points with PDP submittals need to comply with the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code and the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. Street Standards will be subject to the design standards in effect at the time of application for project development plans (PDPs). Common open space areas and streetscapes will be maintained by the owner/developer. The owner/developer will maintain all streetscapes, sidewalks, and bicycle/pedestrian trails including snow removal. Off-site improvements may be required at the time of PDP in order to meet level of service for all modes of transportation. Sight distance easements may be required along the public roadways at the time of PDP review. Response: Notes have been added to the cover sheet. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: Ditch/ irrigation crossings of public streets are allowed provided that the crossing is perpendicular to the roadway, the pipe is sleeved per standards, and an encroachment permit is obtained. Except for the perpendicular crossings, ditch/ irrigation lines are not allowed within the public right of way. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: Should there be an access to lot 5? Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: Label street (Salud Parkway?) as public on plans. Response: Salud Parkway has been labeled as public. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: Please note proposed uses (from TIS) on plan, either in the table or on each lot. Response: A table has been added. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/15/2015 12/15/2015: Show context around ODP so that access spacing can be seen and so that Maple street connection is shown Response: Context has been added. Salud ODP – Comment Responses 3/8/2016 Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/15/2015 12/15/2015: A public street connection through the north side of the area is needed per the area plan. Response: A north public street has been added. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Kimple, 970-416-2401, kkimple@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: • Thank you for submitting the ECS. Several natural habitats and features are identified in the ECS, which will need to be labeled on the ODP, as per Section 2.3.2 (H)(5), which stipulates that the the overall development plan shall show the general location and approximate size of all natural areas, habitats and features within its boundaries and shall indicate the applicant's proposed rough estimate of the natural area buffer zones as required pursuant to Section 3.4.1(E). The features that should be labeled on the ODP are: o Larimer Canal No. 2 and associated wetlands, with the required the 50’ buffer zone standard for irrigation ditches that serve as wildlife corridors and wetlands less than 1/3 acre in size o Tree Groups A, C, D, E, which create a ‘continuous riparian corridor’ along with the required 50’ buffer for isolated patches of native upland or riparian forest o Tree Groups K and I, which are identified as woodlots/farmstead windbreaks and require a 25’ buffer Response: The Buffers have been added to the plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: • Furthermore, the ODP should address Section 3.4.1(B) of the Land Use Code, the purpose of which is to ensure that when the property is developed, the way in which the proposed physical elements of the development plan are designed and arranged on the site will protect the natural habitats and features both on the site and in the vicinity of the site. Response: More information will be given at time of future PDP submittals. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: Additionally, if plans will impact wetlands along Larimer Canal No. 2, these wetlands will need to be delineated followed by a management and/or mitigation plan. Response: Wetlands will be shown in the future PDP submittal. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: Furthermore, given that Red-tailed Hawks were observed on the site, along with a possible nest in Tree Group A, the site should be surveyed for active Red-tailed and Swainson’s Hawk nest sites with future PDP submittals, as per Section 3.4.1 (N)(5). Salud ODP – Comment Responses 3/8/2016 Response: Acknowledged. Department: Historical Preservation Contact: Maren Bzdek, , mbzdek@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015 12/16/2015: This project does not appear to be affecting any buildings or structures 50 years old or older. However, please contact Historic Preservation staff if this project does contain, or is located close to, any such buildings or structures. The dates of adjacent and nearby buildings and structures may be found through the County Assessor's records. Response: Acknowledged. Department: Light And Power Contact: Luke Unruh, 9704162724, lunruh@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/15/2015 12/15/2015: Three phase service is readily avalible on the site. Please contact Luke Unruh at Utility - Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416-2724. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Response: Acknowledged. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015 12/16/2015: Comcast would like to see a 6 foot utility easement on a plat map, and a 13 foot PUE along Laporte Ave outside of the ROW. Response: Utility Easements will be dedicated and shown on the subdivision plat at PDP. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015 Please see attached comments from the Larimer and Weld Ditch Co. Response: Acknowledged. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/09/2015 12/09/2015: PRIOR COMMENTS Prior PDR project comments will apply going forward. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/09/2015 Salud ODP – Comment Responses 3/8/2016 12/09/2015: FIRE CODE COMPLIANCE Based upon occupancy classification and building size, fire code requirements will apply individually as each lot is developed. Fire access and water supply issues will need to be resolved prior to development of any lot. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: FIRE LANES Based upon discussion comments at city staff review meeting of 12/16/15, this comment is intended to provide clarity for future planning/design purposes. Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building perimeter. Some distance allowances can be made when the building is equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system. Code language provided below. > IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension if the building is equipped throughout with an approved, automatic fire-sprinkler system. Response: Acknowledged. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Heidi Hansen, 970-221-6854, hhansen@fcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/15/2015 12/15/2015: Chapter 10 of the City Municipal Code prohibits critical facilities such as emergency or urgent care facilities in the floodplain. Per previous meetings with the applicant, this facility cannot be designated as an emergency or urgent care facility. Response: The existing building will not be designated as Critical Facility. Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@fcgov.com Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: Please add a short narrative to the drainage memo addressing the plan for detention for the site. Response: A narrative has been added to the drainage memo. Salud ODP – Comment Responses 3/8/2016 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: Any areas that will be scraped will need to provide water quality treatment and detention prior to runoff being released offsite. Please modify the drainage report to indicate this requirement, specifically for Lot 1. Response: A note has been added to the memo regarding the removal and redevelopment of existing imperviousness. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: Please clarify on the plans which buildings will remain and which will be removed. Response: Buildings have been labeled. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/10/2015 12/10/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Line over text issues have been revised. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/10/2015 12/10/2015: ODP: Please add a legal description for the project property. Response: Legal description has been added. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: The ODP TIS has been submitted and reviewed and the conclusions accepted. Note the following conclusions from the TIS regarding lane improvements on LaPorte: a center left turn lane is needed in the short term, and a Westbound right turn lane is needed upon full buildout. Specifics on these improvements and their timing will need to be determined in individual PDPs. Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: The approval of the ODP will be for the uses assumed in the TIS. Those should be listed on the plans. Response: Land Uses have been added. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: Adjacent street improvements (sidewalks, etc) will be needed with PDPs. Salud ODP – Comment Responses 3/8/2016 Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: The LCUASS spacing standards between the new road and Grandview cannot be met. Please maximize the spacing, and plan on a shared center turn lane between the two. A variance will be required. Response: The road has been aligned along the eastern property line to allow for maximum spacing. A variance will be requested at the time of PDP. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Shane Boyle, 970-221-6339, sboyle@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015 12/17/2015: Please modify the Utility Plan to show how water line looping could be accomplished for Lot 6. Also, how will sewer be provided to Lot 5 if the lot develops into multiple units per the zoning of this lot? Response: The waterline has been revised to be looped. A sewer service has been routed to enter Lot 5 at the lower end of the Lot. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015 12/14/2015: The planning signature block needs to be changed to the Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services. Response: Signature block has been revised.