HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOX GROVE PHASE ONE - FDP - FDP140030 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSland planning landscape architecture urban design entitlement
March 2, 2016
Jason Holland
City of Fort Collins
281 N. College
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: Fox Grove Phase One, FDP140030, Round Number 2
Please see the following summary of comment responses from the above referenced project.
If have any questions regarding the responses in red contact Stephanie Van Dyken with Ripley Design Inc.
For responses in blue please contact Stephanie Thomas at Northern Engineering
Comment Summary:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
We need some additional notations on the plans to make sure the common
fencing has a consistent look throughout the project. Please add the following
note to the site plan and also a note on the fencing detail that references the
note (or duplicate the note on the detail): Fencing: All fencing and masonry
columns shown shall be installed in accordance with the locations shown on
these plans. All fencing and masonry columns shall utilize a consistent color,
finish, material and design detail. All columns and fencing shall be located at
least 2 feet behind the sidewalks. Refer to sheet 4 of 8 for fence and column
design detail. Any additional common area fencing and any additional fencing
for individual single-family lot lines must utilize the same color, finish, material
and design detail established with the fencing shown on these plans.
Response: Notes have been added.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
Per the redlines, please make sure all of the common areas show turf hatching.
Also there were a couple of trees located close to HC ramps. Change the
fence labeling from 6 feet to 5 feet. Landscape Plan title is misspelled on page
5 of 8. Please also label the fence columns on the site plan as a typical.
Response: Hatch has been added to the pocket park, trees have been moved away from the ramps, fence labels have been
updated, landscape has been spelled correctly, column notes have been added.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
Fox Grove FDP – Comment Responses Round 3
March 2, 2016
Page 2 of 4
Please remove one of the trees shown on lot 48.
Response: Trees have been removed due to driveway locations
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
Lots 53 through 58 (half of lot 53) backing to Carriage Parkway must have at a
minimum rear lot line fencing to provide privacy and transition and contribute to
an attractive street corridor along Carriage Parkway in accordance with
3.2.1(E)(1) and 3.2.1(H). This could be split rail or privacy fencing/columns with
pockets of shrubs along the fence line in the common area. Additionally, we
would encourage, but not require, showing a combination of split rail and
privacy fencing on the plans at all lot lines along outlot A, C and E to provide
transition and ensure that the common areas are defined.
Response: Privacy fencing has been added along lots 53 to 58
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tsiegmund@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/19/2014
12/19/2014: The (4) off-site easement dedication documents have been
received. An additional TDRF fee of $1,000 is needed to dedicate easements
by separate document. Once approved, a recording fee to record the
documents at the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder’s Office will be needed.
The recording fee will be calculated and communicated when the dedication
documents are final.
Response: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
03/11/2015: Formatting error on sheet ST4. Please revise. See redlines
Response: Revised.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
03/11/2015: Please label the rip rap on sheet R1. See redlines
Response: Label added.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
03/11/2015: LCUASS drawing 706, 1606, 1607 have been recently updated.
Please update on the details sheet.
Response: Details Revised.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
03/11/2015: Please label the sight distance easement along Carriage Parkway
on the site plan and landscape plan.
Response: sight distance easements have been labeled.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
03/19/2015: A development agreement will need to be executed prior to final
plan approval. Information will be sent to the Developer to begin this process.
Response: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 03/19/2015
03/19/2015: A DCP permit will need to be obtained prior to starting any
construction on the site. Please contact me to schedule the DCP meeting.
Response: Acknowledged.
Fox Grove FDP – Comment Responses Round 3
March 2, 2016
Page 3 of 4
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/16/2015
Please change these ornamental trees used as street trees on the followinglots.
ARC Shadblow Serviceberry
ART Tatarian Maple
Lots: 5, 13, 55, 65, 38
Change to one or both of the following.
Chanticleer Pear
Red Barron Crabapple
Response: Trees have been replaced
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/16/2015
03/16/2015:
Eliminate one of the street trees by lot 62 as they are closer than 20 feet apart.
Response: Tree has been removed.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 03/10/2015
03/10/2015: There is a project datum note on the grading plans, that says
basically the same thing as Note #3. We would prefer the project datum note be
removed, and that Note #3 is used. If this note is going to stay, the NAVD99
needs to be changed to NAVD88. See redlines.
Response: Note removed.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014
03/11/2015: Please add new title commitment information as available.
12/30/2014: Please add new title commitment information as available.
Response: New title commitment will be provided with mylar submittal.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014
03/11/2015: This has not been corrected.
12/30/2014: The text in the Land Use Table is fuzzy. Please clean it up. See
redlines.
Response: Fuzzy table has been fixed.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014
03/11/2015: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate
document must be added prior to mylars.
12/30/2014: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate
document, must be added prior to producing mylars.
Response: Reception numbers will be added at mylar submittal.
Fox Grove FDP – Comment Responses Round 3
March 2, 2016
Page 4 of 4
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/30/2014
03/11/2015: There are still line over text issues. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been revised
12/30/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 03/11/2015
03/11/2015: Please correct the index on sheet 1 as shown. See redlines.
Response: Index has been revised.