HomeMy WebLinkAboutHOUSKA AUTOMOTIVE EXPANSION - BDR - BDR150010 - REPORTS - DRAINAGE REPORTFinal Drainage Report
For
Houska Automotive Repair
Fort Collins, Colorado
Prepared for:
D and N Houska Family, Family , LLLLLLLLCCCC
c/o Dennis Houska
899 Riverside Drive
Fort Collins, Colorado
Prepared by:
908 Laporte Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
(970) 219-2834
February 10, 2016
ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION
I hereby state that this Drainage and Erosion Control report for the Houska Automotive
Repair project was prepared by me or under my direct supervision for the owners’
thereof and meets or exceeds the criteria in the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage
Design Criteria and Construction Standards.
-------------------------------------------
Stacy J. Gowing
Registered Professional Engineer
State of Colorado No: 34290
FOR REVIEW ONLY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 1111
II. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ................................ ........................... 1111
A. Property Location .................................................................................................... 1
B. Description of Property .......................................................................................... 2
C. Developed Conditions ............................................................................................ 2
III. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-SUB -BASINS ................................ ................................ ... 3333
A. Major Basin Description .............................................................................................. 3
IV. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA ................................ ................................ ................. 3333
A. Four Step Process .......................................................................................................... 3
B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints ............................................... 4
C. Hydrological and Hydraulic Criteria......................................................................... 5
V. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN ................................ ................................ .................. 5555
A. General Concept ........................................................................................................... 5
B. Specific Details – Detention ........................................................................................ 5
C. Specific Details – Inlets and Storm Sewer ............................................................... 5
D. Specific Details – Stormwater Quality ..................................................................... 6
VI. SEDIMENT/EROSION CONTROL ................................ ................................ ............. 7777
VII. CONCLUSIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 7777
A. Compliance with standards ....................................................................................... 7
B. Drainage Concept ......................................................................................................... 7
VIII. REFEEEERRRREEEENNNNCCCCEEEESSSS REF ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 8888
IX. APENDICES ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 8888
1
I. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the pertinent data, methods, assumptions, and references
used in analyzing and preparing the final drainage and water quality design for
the Houska Automotive Repair project (the "project").
II.GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A. Property Location
The project is located on the south side of Riverside Avenue, just southeast
of the existing Houska Automotive site at 899 Riverside Avenue, and it
intended to function as an extension of the existing Houska Automotive use.
The site is an infill site completely surrounded by existing development.
SITE
Vicinity Map, NTS
2
B. Description of Property
1. The project site is an undeveloped parcel located between the existing
Houska Automotive site and the private drive aisle into the Albertson’s
shopping center along the south side of Riverside Avenue.
2. The project site is currently undeveloped; and is 2.28 acres in size.
3. The site is currently covered with weeds, native and volunteer
vegetation; with an existing vegetative cover of approximately 60%.
4. There is no significant off-site runoff entering the site, and the site drains
overland to the south curb and gutter of Riverside Avenue.
5. Existing surface soils, according to the National Resources Conservation
Service, consist of Satanta Loam. The soil type is classified as hydrologic
soil group B.
6. Existing soils underlying the proposed work are classified as clayey sand
(SC), as identified by a soils investigation prepared by Terracon.
7. There are no irrigation ditches or stormwater conveyance systems on
the property.
8. Portions of the project site are located within the City regulatory Old
Town 100-year floodplain. The property is located outside the City
regulatory Old Town 100-year floodway, however floodway is located
inside the Riverside right-of-way adjacent to the property, as shown on
the City’s online floodplain mapping:.
C. Developed Conditions
1. The proposed project consists of 3 buildings to support additional
automotive repair uses, such as tire maintenance and general
automotive repair. None of these buildings are located within the FEMA
or City of Fort Collins Old Town Masterplan 100-year floodplain.
2. The project includes the relocation of the existing Houska access to
provide a single access for both the existing and proposed uses, which
necessitates the relocation of two existing inlets on Riverside. The
project also includes private drive aisles, parking, and associated
hardscape and landscaping.
3. None of the proposed buildings are located within the City regulatory
Old Town 100-year floodplain or floodway.
3
4. The improvements proposed within the floodplain include a driveway,
sidewalks, drainage improvements and miscellaneous site improvements.
5. The project is currently envisioned to be built in two phases. Phase one
includes building one, all the public infrastructure and a temporary
parking area. Phase two includes buildings two and three. The
drainage design for phase one encompasses all phases of the project.
6. The developed site will drain from south to north via overland flow and
swales to a proposed storm drain system located at the northwest corner
of the site. A small portion of the flows on the east and south edges of
the site will run off the site un-detained. These flows are significantly less
than the existing flows leaving the site.
III.DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-SUB -BASINS
A. Major Basin Description
1. The project site lies within the Old Town drainage basin.
2. The project site currently drains overland from south to north, exiting the
site along the western and northern lot lines. Runoff is received by the
existing storm drainage system in Riverside Avenue and the Locust Street
Outfall.
IV. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
A. Four Step Process
The stormwater management strategy for the project is the “Four Step
Process”, with the goal of minimizing adverse impacts of urbanization on
receiving waters. The following is a description of the steps employed to
achieve this goal.
1. Employ Runoff Reduction Practices
a. Vegetated bioswales are proposed along the northern, eastern
and western boundaries of the project site. These will convey
much of the runoff to the proposed regional stormwater
management pond and minimize directly connected impervious
areas. The soft surface swale located in the stormwater
management pond is serpentine in shape and will be heavily
vegetated. This design, in combination with the highly permeable
underlying soils (clayey sands) results in infiltration opportunities
that do not currently exist on site.
4
b. The percentage of proposed impervious cover is 74%. This
impervious cover rate is less than allowed, and less than typical for
intensive commercial development.
c. The vegetated areas will be heavily landscaped, in contrast to the
sparse existing vegetation currently existing, allowing for
decreased effective runoff coefficients.
2. Implement BMP’s That Provide a Water Capture Volume (WQCV) with
Slow Release.
a. The steps described above will provide attenuation for peak rates
of runoff.
b. Additionally, runoff attenuation and water quality treatment is
provided by an Extended Detention Basin. This basin receives a
large majority of runoff from the site prior to exiting the site.
3. Stabilize Drainageways.
a. There are no drainageways or conveyances within the project site,
and the site drains directly to existing storm sewer systems.
However, off-site benefit is achieved through the use of
stormwater detention and extended detention for a site that
currently has neither. By providing these improvements,
discharges are attenuated and treated for water quality.
b. Stormwater impact fees and month stormwater utility fees will be
paid by this development. This additional revenue will contribute
to the overall City programs to stabilize drainageways throughout
the city.
4. Implement Site Specific and Other Source Control BMP’s.
a. The combination of intensive vegetative establishment and water
quality treatment through Low Impact Development (LID)
techniques will allow for a reduction in particulates and adhered
pollutants as compared the existing condition
B. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
1. As previously discussed, historic drainage patterns are maintained with
the proposed project.
5
2. As an infill project, existing topography along the boundary are
maintained.
C. Hydrological and Hydraulic CCCCrrrriiiitttteeeerrrriiiiaaaa
1. Hydrologic and hydraulic criteria is as per the City of Fort Collins Storm
Drainage and Design Criteria and Construction Standards.
2. Analyses are performed using City of Fort Collins spreadsheets and the
methodologies presented in Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual
Volumes 1, 2 and 3; Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver,
Colorado.
V. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
A. General Concept
1. The general direction of proposed storm water flow is from south to north.
Storm water runoff from the site is directed towards a proposed regional
water quality pond located on the northwest corner of the site. This pond
connects to the Locust Street Outfall, which runs north south immediately
west of the site.
2. Existing drainage patterns are maintained by the project. Runoff from the
site in both conditions is collected by adjacent storm sewer systems.
3. Water quality treatment is provided with extended detention (through a
regional water quality pond located on site), and Low Impact
Development techniques as discussed below.
B. Specific Details –––– DDDDeeeetttteeeennnnttttiiiioooonnnn
1. The project is located near at the bottom of the Old Town basin, adjacent
to the Locust Street Outfall. This regional outfall consists of a 108-inch
pipe which is directly connected to the Poudre River. Because of the
location of the site, detention on site would be counter-productive.
Stormwater is proposed to runoff un-detained, allowing the runoff peak to
flow into and through the outfall pipe before the larger peak from the
overall basin arrives. Detention is not included in the project.
CCCC. . Specific Details –––– Inlets and Storm Sewer
1. Two existing storm drain inlets are located under the proposed driveway
and must be relocated. It is expected that these inlets are adequately
sized, so identical inlets are being proposed for areas just outside of the
6
proposed driveway. Both inlets are relocated in such a way as to ensure
they continue to drain to the same receiving drainage system.
a. The 5’ Type R curb inlet on the eastern side of the proposed
driveway is moved approximately 17’ towards the east along
Riverside. To accomplish this, the existing pipe to the existing inlet
is extended to a new manhole behind the curb/gutter. The new
single curb inlet is connected to the new manhole.
b. The 15’ Type R curb inlet on the western side of the driveway is
moved approximately 25’ towards the west along Riverside
Avenue. This inlet drains to a new manhole placed on the existing
receiving storm pipe from the existing inlet. The existing and
proposed inlets drain to the storm vault along the Locust Street
Outfall.
DDDD. . Specific Details –––– Stormwater Quality
1. As previously mentioned, the City of Fort Collins, in cooperation with the
developer, intends to construct a regional water quality pond on site.
This pond will provide extended detention for a large regional drainage
area, and will include treatment for the project site. The regional water
quality pond has a storage volume of approximately 0.71 acre-feet at
elevation 4961.0’, although those figures are expected to change as the
pond goes through final design.
a. An emergency spillway path is provided for the un-detained 100-
year flow through the water quality pond. This path is towards
Riverside Avenue, where the proposed elevations at the back of the
sidewalk are 4961.04. This area acts as a spillway with a level crest
length of 40 feet and a depth of 0.25 feet. The shallow depth
combined with the concrete sidewalk, curb/gutter and paving
results in a stable overflow path for emergency flows.
2. Low Impact Development (LID) water quality treatment is required for
75% of the proposed impervious area. The project includes 1.682 acres
of impervious area, therefore LID treatment is required for 1.262 acres of
impervious area. Three LID techniques are used to accomplish this, as
follows:
a. Water Quality Basin Q1 is 0.408 acres in size and is located along
the western edge of the site. This area includes building 3 and the
interim asphalt parking area proposed in the same location. This
area is 0.408 acres in size and is treated with a Bioswale. There is
an existing bioswale in this location that was associated with the
Houska South subdivision project. This bioswale is proposed to be
widened by an average of 11.1 feet. The existing perforated
7
underdrain will remain. The rim of the existing area inlet will be
raised to elevation 4962.0’ to provide an overflow path.
b. Water Quality Basin Q2 is 0.640 acres in size and is located along
the northern and eastern boundary of the site. This area is treated
with a bioswale 330’ in length, with an average width of 8.4’.
c. Water Quality Basin Q3 is located in the center of the site and
drains to a proposed bioretention pond. The drainage area for this
pond is 0.249 acres.
d. The total area treated is 1.297 acres, which represents 77.1% of the
proposed impervious area.
3. The sizing calculations and an LID summary are included in the
appendix.
VI. SEDIMENT/EROSION CONTROL
Temporary erosion control measures will be implemented with this project, as
detailed under a separate report entitled “Erosion and Sediment Control
Report”, dated 2/10/2016, prepared by Apex Engineering. Please see that
document for more information on the temporary best management practices
proposed to control sediment and erosion during construction.
VII. CCCCOOOONNNNCCCCLLLLUUUUSSSSIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS
A. Compliance with standards
1. All drainage design conforms to the criteria and requirements of City of
Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction Standards.
2. Proposed drainage improvements conform to the concepts and
recommendations of the Old Town Basin master plan.
B. Drainage Concept
1. The proposed drainage plan concept for the project will be effective for
the control of stormwater runoff and water quality for the proposed site
and conforms to City of Fort Collins standards.
8
VIII. RRRREEEEFFFFEEEERRRREEEENNNNCCCCEEEESSSS
1. City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage and Design Criteria and Construction
Standards.
2. Old Town Drainage Master Plan; Anderson Consulting, July 15, 2003.
3. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1-3; Urban Drainage and
Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado, April 2008.
4. Geotechnical Engineering Report, Houska Large Truck Facility; Terracon
(project number 20155048), dated 11/11/2015.
IX. APENDICES
Appendix I - Hydrologic Calculations
Peak Discharge Calculations
Appendix II - Hydraulic and Detention Calculations
LID Stormwater Management Summary Worksheet
Bioretention Sizing Worksheet
Emergency Spillway Sizing Report
Appendix III - Mapping and Plans
Annotated Flood Insurance Rate Map
Drainage Exhibit (24”x36”)
9
Appendix 1 – Hydrology
10
11
12
Appendix II – Hydraulics
13
14
15
16
Appendix III – Mapping and Plans
17