The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPARKING AT 620 S. LEMAY AVE. - MJA/FDP - FDP150009 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview May 27, 2015 Cara Scohy CS Design, Inc. 2519 S. Shields St. #129 Fort Collins, CO 80526 RE: Parking at 620 S Lemay Ave, FDP150009, Round Number 2 Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General 03/31/2015: This is a major amendment, there needs to be a sheet showing the original boundaries of the approved plan and how this proposal is expanding the boundaries. There needs to be a Use table showing existing and proposed uses. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 05/19/2015: I'd suggest verifying the civil linework with the plat information. The 9 foot utility easement depiction around the curve to the south appears to widen greater than the plat specifies. 04/01/2015: The civil drawings don't appear to be in sync with the plat in terms of lot line information along Hoffman Mill Road and should be consistent with the plat. Our City Surveyor would concur with the plat on the property line boundary, with no angle point being created in the dedicated right-of-way, and that there is no excess right-of-way needing to be vacated. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 05/19/2015: The drawings should be depicting truncated dome detection across the driveway (north-south) as indicated in the driveway detail. 04/01/2015: Please ensure the drive approach is indicated in details and plan view as a Type IV driveway approach. This link is the most recent updated version of the construction detail and should be used: http://larimer.org/engineering/GMARdStds/2014%20Changes/NoRedlines/707.2.pdf Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or nbeals@fcgov.com. Page 1 of 8 05/19/2015: The response indicates minimal discharge so as not to be of impact. There should still be 2 feet of recycled asphalt provided behind the additional asphalt being added for the transition back to the existing asphalt. 04/01/2015: Are there implications from a Stormwater perspective on the curb and gutter point discharge to existing asphalt that would need to be considered? Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 Topic: General 05/19/2015: Carried over for reference. I'm understanding as of new information from last week that City Natural Areas may end up being the future owner of this property. 04/01/2015: With the offsite grading and waterline extension shown occurring on the property to the east, a letter from of intent is needed from that property owner (shown on Larimer County records as "Springer Fisher Inc.") prior to a hearing, with an actual construction easement required at time of development approval, as well as presumably a utility easement for the waterline extension. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 05/19/2015: The response indicates that the street improvements are to continue to the property line. The civil drawing proposal stops short of the property line, which is acceptable given the circumstances with the "Laurel Street" access points. The 10 asphalt foot transition shown on the northbound movement isn't depicted to existing asphalt however, the offset from existing asphalt is greater and should reflect a longer transition than 10 feet. Are there any anticipated drainage concerns or drainage easements needed at the termination of the curb and gutter section for Hoffman Mill Road? The local street portion of Hoffman Mill Road (minus sidewalk) will need to be provided in-lieu of constructing Hoffman Mill Road to the property line. 04/01/2015: The drawings (site, landscape and civil) appear to show the continuation of Hoffman Mill Road street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) past the property boundary, but I believe the actual intention is to end the improvements at the property boundary. The plans (especially the Civil plans) need to show both where the limits of proposed improvements end, how the proposed improvement will tie into the existing condition (no curb and gutter, existing edge of pavement, transitioning from widened road to paved road, etc.), and how the extension of additional improvements in the future would be situated in terms of being within right-of-way or would additional right-of-way/easement be needed? Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 05/19/2015: The civil plans reflect stopping the improvements short as indicated in the previous comment, but note that the site and landscape plans appear to show improvements to the property line, including the placement of turf partially over the existing driveway. 04/01/2015: Continuing on the previous comment, there is an existing driveway for what's indicated on signage as Laurel Street. How will the proposed street improvements tie into the existing driveway condition? Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 05/19/2015: Could there be an option to have the project name not be "Parking at 620 S. Lemay Ave." and instead the title just be the platted name of Poudre River Business Park Fourth Filing? It would seem to reduce potential future confusion on having the project known with two different titles. It also simplifies the development agreement in making the project name coincide with the platted name. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/19/2015 Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Kimple, , kkimple@fcgov.com Topic: General Page 2 of 8 05/14/2015: All environmental planning comments have been resolved. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/14/2015 Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans 05/21/2015: Final Comments: Please change the following plants used in the habitat area to native species. Austrian Pine changed to Ponderosa Pine Shubert’s Chokecherry changed to the native chokecherry which is Prunus virginiana. Specify the choke cherry as 6 foot clump. Check the trees marked as mitigation trees in the plant list. The direct labeling on the plan is correct but differs from what is recorded in the plant list. The following appears to be the list of the mitigation trees that should be recorded in the plant list. 6 Kentucky Coffeetree 5 Sensation Boxelder Add this sentence to note number 2 on sheet L1 that describes the tree mitigation. Habitat planting around the perimeter of the parking lot provides an equivalent of 8 mitigation trees. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/21/2015 Department: Internal Services Contact: Todd Reidenbach, , Topic: General 03/20/2015: There are no comments from GIS for this project. ………………………… TODD REIDENBACH, GISP GIS Mapping Specialist – Information Technology City of Fort Collins 215 N. Mason St, 3rd Floor 970-416-2483 office 970-221-6329 fax treidenbach@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/20/2015 Department: Light And Power Contact: Janet McTague, 970-224-6154, jmctague@fcgov.com Topic: General 04/01/2015: Light and Power has existing facilities along Poudre River Drive. We will need a C-1 form to define electric requirements and will also need to coordinate a location for a transformer within 10' of a paved surface. Normal development fees will apply. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Megan Harrity, , Page 3 of 8 Topic: General 03/17/2015: This comment is in reference to the title of the plat and the dedication of the plat. The Title reads; POUDRE RIVER RANCH BUSINESS PARK FOURTH FIL and the dedications reads; POUDRE RIVER BUSINESS PARK FOURTH FIL Please double check these as I believe that these should be the same. Thank you, Megan Harrity Subdivisions Larimer County Assessor 970-498-7065 mharrity@larimer.org Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/17/2015 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 04/01/2015: Please provide in the report a set of maintenance notes with Standard Operating Procedures for the bioretention system and for the pervious pavement system. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 05/20/2015: Please provide a forebay at the inflow point from the parking lot into the bioretention area. The biortention detail should use actual elevations and depths especially for the subsurface areas. Please use the correct page reference for the bioretention detail on the grading plan as it currently references sheet 8.4 rathaer than 8.5 for the details. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/20/2015 Topic: Drainage Report 04/01/2015: Please clarify the capacity of the downstream pipe and if the entire overflow from the bioretention pond and the pavers will be able to drain through the dowstream pipe system. What happens when the paver system overflows, in case of plugging how will the overflow be directed back into the drainage system ? Will the overflow pipe in the bioretention area be able to handle the 100 year flows ? if not where will the spill be directed to ? Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 Topic: Landscape Plans 04/01/2015: Please clarify what planting will be done at the bottom of the rain garden. Specify if a rock mulch will be used there as well. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/01/2015 Contact: Glen Schlueter, 970-224-6065, gschlueter@fcgov.com Topic: Fees Page 4 of 8 04/17/2015: There are Stormwater fees due for the increase in impervious area. The city wide Stormwater development fee (PIF) is $7,817/acre ($0.1795 sq.-ft.) for new impervious area over 350 sq.-ft., and there is a $1,045.00/acre ($0.024/sq.-ft.) review fee. Please contact Jean Pakech at 221-6375 or jpakech@fcgov.com to determine the fee for this project. Since a building permit is not required for parking lots this will be billed seperately. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/17/2015 Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control 05/19/2015: Erosion Control Plans have redlines that were not addressed. Erosion control Report has relines that were never addressed. Please correct and return with next submittle. 03/18/2015: Erosion Control Plans and Erosion Control Report have significant redlines, Erosion Control Escrow Will need to be recalculated after Erosion control plan is acceptable. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/18/2015 Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Page 5 of 8 05/19/2015: We would prefer that you have 2 benchmarks, but will not rewuire it. Please correct the spelling errors. See redlines. 03/30/2015: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum. Please provide the following information in the EXACT format shown below. If your project is started on NAVD88 datum: 1) PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: OR, if project has already been surveyed in NAVD29 Unadjusted datum: 2) PROJECT DATUM: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (OLD CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: If using NGVD29 UNADJUSTED the following equation statement will be needed. NOTE: IF NAVD 88 DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NAVD88 = NGVD29 UNADJUSTED + X.XX¿ Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 05/19/2015: There are still line over text issues. See redlines. 03/30/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 05/19/2015: There are still text over text issues. See redlines. 03/30/2015: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 05/19/2015: Please remove the legal description shown on sheet C1.0, unless another department required it. The "Lot 1, Poudre River Business Park, Fourth Filing" in the title is the legal description. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/19/2015 Topic: Landscape Plans 05/18/2015: The lighter background text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up. See redlines. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/18/2015 Topic: Lighting Plan 05/18/2015: No comments. 03/30/2015: No comments. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 Topic: Plat Page 6 of 8 05/19/2015: This has not been corrected. Please add a comma to the title in the Statement Of Ownership And Subdivision. See redlines. 03/30/2015: Please make sure all titles match. See redlines. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 05/19/2015: These have not been provided yet, but have been informed that they will be submitted at a later date. 03/30/2015: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 Topic: Site Plan 03/30/2015: The title needs to match the Subdivision Plat. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 03/30/2015: Please revise the legal description to match the title on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 03/30/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 03/30/2015: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 03/30/2015 05/19/2015: The lighter background text & linework marked is not acceptable. It will not scan or reproduce. Please darken it up. See redlines. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/19/2015 Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 05/20/2015: Do the directional ramps as shown work with the attached walks? 03/31/2015: The current standard for curb cuts is for them to be directional and not radial into the middle of the intersection. The pedestiran treatment at the intersection of Poudre River Drive and Hoffman Mill Road should reflect the current standard. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/31/2015 Topic: General 05/20/2015: I didn't see any signing or striping plans. Perhaps I missed them? Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/20/2015 Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General 03/24/2015: A landscape plan shall contain accurate and identifiable hydrozones, including a water budget chart that shows the total annual water use, which shall not exceed fifteen (15) gallons per square foot over the site. If you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6704. Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/24/2015 Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Page 7 of 8 Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings 04/02/2015: Please provide a detail for the fire hydrant assembly. Please provide a profile for the extended sewer line in Poudre River Dr. If no valves are existing at the water line Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 05/20/2015: Extension of the water and sewer lines will depend on whether the City buys the property to the East and on what facilities might be needed there. This issue will need to be discussed further. If the water line is to be terminated that abandonment of the line will needs to be done at the valve by capping the existing extended line that goes east along Poudre River Drive at the main. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/20/2015 Topic: Easements 04/02/2015: 20-feet wide public easements will be needed for the extended water and sewer line stubs that are outside the Right of Way limits and on private property. These can overlap however a minimum of 10 feet separation must be maintained. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/02/2015 Page 8 of 8