HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH, OLIVE & PHARRIS, LLC LAW OFFICES - PDP - PDP140008 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS (3)ITEM NO PDP140008
MEETING DATE June 11, 2015
STAFF Noah Beals
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
Planning Services 281 N College Ave – PO Box 580 – Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
fcgov.com/developmentreview/ 970.221.6750
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Offices
Project Development Plan, #PDP140008
APPLICANT: MaOIPH LLC
Contact: Brad March
110 East Oak Street, Suite 200
Fort Collins, CO 80524
OWNER: JOSHI and PASS LTD
1401 Linden Lake Road
Fort Collins, CO 80524
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for approval of Project Development Plan (PDP) March, Olive & Pharris LLC
Law Office, PDP140008. The project is located on the east side of S College Ave between
Pitkin and Lake Street.
The project changes the use of an existing structure from single family dwelling to office. With
this change, the number of off-street parking spaces increases to 10. Additionally, 5 bicycle
parking spaces are included. The site is zoned Community Commercial (C-C), and office use
is permitted subject to an administrative (Type 1) review (Land Use Code Section 4.18(B)(2)(c)).
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Project Development Plan (PDP)
March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Office, PDP140008, with the following conditions that the Final
Plan is not approved until:
• A decree from the court, in the case known as Joshi and Pass LTD et.al. v. Swan Lake
Trust et.al. 2014CV30539 District Court, Larimer County, Colorado, terminates the
1978 agreement.
• The landscape plan illustrates the 3ft metal fence and ivy extending along the north side
the parking stall labeled Parking Stall 1.
• The parking table on sheet S1 is revised with the correct number of off-street parking
spaces
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Office Project Development Plan complies with the
applicable requirements of the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC), more specifically:
March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Offices PDP #PDP140008
Type 1 June 11, 2015
Page 2
• The Project Development Plan is in compliance with the process located in Division
2.2 – Common Development Review Procedures for Development Applications of
Article 2 – Administration.
• The Project Development Plan is in compliance with the relevant standards located
in Article 3 – General Development Standards.
• The combined Project Development Plan is in compliance with the relevant
standards located in Division 4.18 Community Commercial District (C-C) of Article 4
– Districts.
COMMENTS:
1. Background:
Historically the following approvals have been granted to the property:
• L.C. Moore’s First Addition (annexation and plat) – July 1921
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
Direction Zone District Existing Land Use
North
Community Commercial (C-C) Commercial Use: The Healing Path
South
Community Commercial (C-C) Commercial Use: Multi-Tenant Business Building
East
Community Commercial (C-C) Public Right-of-Way: Alley
Community Commercial (C-C) Residential: Single Family Dwellings
West
Community Commercial (C-C) Public Right-of-Way: S College Ave/US Highway
287
College Campus, Not zoned Colorado State University
Zoning History (most recent to past):
• During the citywide rezoning in 1997, the property was rezoned to Community
Commercial (C-C). This zoning remains in effect today.
• The property was rezoned to High Density Residential (RH) sometime between 1976
and1986.
March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Offices PDP #PDP140008
Type 1 June 11, 2015
Page 3
• The City Zoning Code was update in 1965 with new zone districts. At that time, the
property was rezoned to Low Density Residential (RL).
• In 1929, upon adoption of City Zoning Code the property was zoned “A” Residence.
2. Compliance with Article 4 of the Land Use Code – Community Commercial (C-C):
The project complies with all applicable Article 4 standards as follows:
A. Section 4.26(A) and (B) – Permitted Uses
• The purpose of the C-C zone district is to encourage a combination
residential and non-residential uses. The office use is consistent with the
purposes and is a permitted use within this district.
3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code – General Development
Standards
The project complies with all applicable General Development Standards; with the following
relevant comments provided:
A. Division 3.2 – Site Planning and Design Standards
1) 3.2.1 Landscaping and Tree Protection:
• The existing landscaping includes the typical elements associated with a
single family dwelling. The project is preserving 3 of the 6 existing trees.
However, with an increase in parking area and new public right-of-way
dedication the landscaping changes include the removal of 3 trees and some
grass areas.
• To reduce the impact of the new parking area it is surfaced with a product
called grasscrete. Grasscrete is a paver system that allows for vegetation to
grow in designed voids in the pavers. For this project the vegetation is
intended to be a deep rooted fescue.
• Parking areas are required to provide a landscape setback of 5 ft. from an
interior property line. This project has new parking areas that extend within 1
foot or less of the interior property lines. To meet the alternative compliance
of this landscape requirement, the project has included a 3 ft. high metal
fence with ivy to be planted along the fence. The fence and ivy extend the
full length of each parking stall along the north and south property line.
• Additionally, the project is replanting some juniper bushes in front of the
building. Previous caretakers of the property removed bushes that were in
this location.
March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Offices PDP #PDP140008
Type 1 June 11, 2015
Page 4
2) 3.2.2 Access, Circulation and Parking:
• All access points currently established are maintained. The project includes
driveway and sidewalk that extend to S College Ave. These improvements
seek to enhance the safety conditions of the sidewalk and driveway by
widening both.
• Parking conditions of the site change. The garage structure is converted into
office use and surface parking stalls are added. A total of 10 parking stalls
are provided, with one of these being a van accessible handicap space.
• At the time of submittal the parking requirements of the Land Use Code did
not include a minimum number of parking spaces. It did include and a
maximum number of spaces. The maximum number of spaces is based on
the total square footage of the buildings, it allows 3 parking space for 1,000
square feet. The square footage of the building is approximately 4,000
square feet. This project only includes 10 spaces, which is less than the
maximum of 12.
• The project includes 5 new bicycle spaces located on the north side of the
building.
3) 3.2.4 Site Lighting:
• The project includes no changes to the existing site lighting.
4) 3.2.5 Trash and Recycling Enclosures:
• To meet the trash and recycling enclosure requirement, space in the existing
garage structure has been designated as the trash and recycling storage
area.
B. Division 3.4.7 – Historic and Cultural Resources
1) 3.4.7(A) & (B) Historic:
• The Landmark Preservation Commission found the property would qualify for
designation.
• History Colorado has also found the property would qualify for National and
State Register listing.
• The Historic Preservation Planner reviewed the plans for compliance with the
applicable historic preservation standards and found the project to be in
compliance with the applicable historic preservation standards.
C. Division 3.5.3 – Commercial Buildings
March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Offices PDP #PDP140008
Type 1 June 11, 2015
Page 5
1) 3.5.3 Relationship of Buildings to Streets, Walkways, and Parking
• Commercial buildings are required to have a connecting walkway from the
main entrance of the building to the public sidewalk. As mentioned before the
sidewalk location will not change with this project, but the sidewalk will be
widened. The sidewalk provides direct connection from the public sidewalk to
the main entrance of the building.
• In promoting multi-modal transportation, commercial buildings are required to
be built within a certain distance to the public right-of-way. Additionally,
vehicle use areas are prohibited between the building façade and the public
right-of-way. Since this is an existing structure, the build-to-line is not
applicable, but the prohibition of vehicle use area between the building and
the public right-of-way is. This project introduces new vehicle use areas. The
new areas are to the side and the rear of the buildings, in compliance with the
standard.
3. 1978 Agreement
A. The 1978 Agreement was signed by the owners of the properties of 1304, 1312, and
1318 S College Ave and the City Manager, at that time. In summary the agreement
conditioned the change of use of 1312 S College Ave. It stipulated that if 1312 S
College changed to a nonresidential use that the driveway access on S College Ave
would be eliminated and the property would take access from a shared driveway on
the property of 1318 S College Ave. The agreement also identified existing
landscaping that should be preserved.
The project as shown would not meet the conditions of the 1978 Agreement.
Specifically, it removes a tree that was identified to be preserved and continues
access from the existing driveway. After reviewing the project, City staff does not
object to the access of the property continuing from the existing driveway and the
removal of the tree.
4. Findings of Fact/Conclusion
After evaluating the request for the Project Development Plan, March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law
Office, Staff makes the following findings of fact:
A. The combined PDP/FP complies with all applicable administrative standards
contained within Article 2 of the Land Use Code.
B. The combined PDP/FP complies with all applicable General Development
Standards contained in Article 3 of the Land Use Code.
C. The combined PDP/FP complies with all applicable district standards of Section
4.18 of the Land Use Code, C-C — Community Commercial District.
March, Olive & Pharris LLC Law Offices PDP #PDP140008
Type 1 June 11, 2015
Page 6
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the of Project Development Plan, March, Olive & Pharris LLC
Law Office,- #PDP140008, with the following conditions that the Final Plan is not approved until:
• A decree from the court, in the case known as Joshi and Pass LTD et.al. v. Swan Lake
Trust et.al. 2014CV30539 District Court, Larimer County, Colorado, terminates the
1978 agreement.
• The landscape plan illustrates the 3ft metal fence and ivy extending along the north side
the parking stall labeled Parking Stall 1.
• The parking table on sheet S1 is revised with the correct number of off-street parking
spaces
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Plan set
2. Planning Objectives
3. Emails from Citizens
4. 1978 Agreement