HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVER MODERN - FDP - FDP150034 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - EROSION CONTROL LETTER/REPORTEROSION CONTROL REPORT/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR
River Modern Subdivision
900 East Stuart
Prepared by:
Interwest Consulting Group
1218 West Ash, Suite C
Windsor, Colorado 80550
Phone: 970.674.3300
Fax: 970.674.3303
Prepared for:
BHA Design
1603 Oakridge Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80524
970-223-7577
September 30, 2015
September 30, 2015
Mr. Jesse Schlam
City of Fort Collins Stormwater
700 Wood Street
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
RE: Erosion Control Report /Stormwater Management Plan for River Modern
Subdivision—900 East Stuart
Dear Jesse,
I am pleased to submit for your review and approval, this Erosion Control Report/Stormwater
Management Plan for the River Modern Subdivision. This report provides the City with an
erosion control plan for the proposed development that addresses the topics outlined in the City
Erosion Control Report Requirements. This plan mimics the State of Colorado General Permit
and Stormwater Management Plan requirements.
I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this submittal. Please call if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Erika Schneider, P.E.
Interwest Consulting Group
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1
2. SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 1
3. BMPS FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ................................................ 6
3.1. Erosion and Sediment Controls ........................................................................................ 6
3.2 Materials Handling and Spill Prevention ......................................................................... 8
4. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS ................................................................ 10
4.1. SWMP Administrator ..................................................................................................... 10
4.2. Identification of Potential Pollution Sources ................................................................. 10
5. FINAL STABILIZATION AND LONG TERM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ......... 12
6. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ................................................................................. 12
6.1. City of Fort Collins Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Notes ............................. 13
6.2. City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Security Calculations ........................................... 14
7. SWMP IMPLEMENTATION................................................................................................ 16
APPENDIX A—BMP DETAILS ................................................................................................ A
APPENDIX B—EROSION CONTROL PLAN ......................................................................... B
APPENDIX C—CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE .................................................................... C
APPENDIX D—SOIL INFORMATION ................................................................................... D
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1—Vicinity Map…………………………………………………………………………..3
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1—On-site Soil Characteristics…………………………………………………………..4
Table 6.1—Erosion Control Cost Estimate……………………………………………………...15
1
1. INTRODUCTION
The primary purpose of preparing and maintaining a stormwater management plan is to
improve the health and quality of the State's urban waterways. The preparation and
maintenance of the plan will contribute to this objective by facilitating an approach to
stormwater management, establishing a program of actions to be used during construction
activities, and describing stormwater management controls and various Best Management
Practices (BMPs) necessary to reduce erosion, sediment and pollutants in stormwater
discharge.
Information concerning the State of Colorado General Permit and Stormwater
Management Plan are not included in the appendices of this report. The site is over one
acre and will require a SWMP permit. This document can be used by the contractor as a
part of the required documentation for the permit.
2. SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is located north of Stuart Street between Stover Street and Lemay
Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. More specifically it is known as the west 264 feet of
Tract 7 of East Acres, being a portion of the W1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 24, Township
7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M., City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of
Colorado. See Figure 1 for a vicinity map.
The project is located north of E. Stuart Street and south of Spring Creek. Shadowbrook
PUD is located to the west of the project and the Springmeadows Condos property and
Replat of Stuart Hill PUD are located to the east.
The property is approximately 4.4 acres in size and will consist of 30 single family paired
homes along with the conversion of an existing residential structure into a Child Care
Center. The site will be served by three undersized private drives which account for the
majority of the proposed pavement area. The total disturbed area will be about 3.3 acres.
2
The land currently slopes to the north at about 6%. The majority of the land is currently
vacant with an existing house, garage and shed located in the southeast corner of the
property. The majority of the ground cover is pasture. There are small offsite flows onto
the property from the east. Flow will be collected in pervious pavers and a proposed inlet
and treated in a water quality pond. This pond will discharge directly into Spring Creek.
Spring Creek is located in the north portion of the property. The property is located
within a FEMA 100-year floodplain (FEMA FIRM Panels 08069C0983H and
08069C0979H, effective May 2, 2012).
3
Figure 1--Vicinity Map
4
The existing soil type on-site consists of Kim loam (48%), Altvan Satanta loams (21%),
Stoneham loam (13%) and Satanta loam (4%) which are classified as Type B by the
Natural Resources Conservation Service. The remaining soil type is Nunn clay loam
(14%) which is classified as Type C and is located in the area of Spring Creek. Please
refer to Table 2.1 for additional soil characteristics.
Table 2.1: On-site Soil Characteristics
Soil Type
Percent
of Site
Hydrologic
Soil Group
K
Factor1
Wind
Group2
Altvan-Satanta loam, 3 to 9 % slopes 21.1% B 0.28 5
Kim loam, 5 to 9 % slopes 48.4% B 0.28 4L
Nunn clay loam, wet, 1 to 3 % slopes 13.9% C 0.24 6
Satanta loam, 1 to 3 % slopes 3.9% B 0.32 5
Stoneham loam, 1 to 3 % slopes 12.7% B 0.28 6
1K factors range from 0.02 to 0.69. The higher value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and
rill erosion by water.
2Soils assigned to wind group 1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, soils assigned to wind
group 8 are the least susceptible.
Overall, the soils on site can be classified as moderately erodible. Please refer to
Appendix D for the on-site soil information from the NRCS Soil Survey of Larimer
County.
5
The anticipated sequence of construction shall progress as follows:
1) Site demolition and as quickly as possible the installation of perimeter erosion
control measures (other measures as required for erosion control will be
constructed throughout), gravel bags along the East Stuart Street (both installed
prior to demolition) and the concrete washout and vehicle tracking pad off of East
Stuart Street.
2) Clearing, stripping and grading
3) Utility installation
4) Sub-grade preparation for the drives and sidewalks
5) Curb, gutter and sidewalks
6) Paving
7) Final grading and landscaping. All disturbed ground will be impervious (concrete,
asphalt, or building), seeded and mulched, sodded or xeriscaped to permanently
stabilize the site.
8) Building construction
The weighted average 10-year runoff coefficient associated with this project is 0.55.
No outside sources of pollution currently exist on this site. Potential pollutant sources
brought onto the site during construction will be discussed (along with spill prevention)
in Section 3.2 below. The anticipated non-stormwater components of discharge with this
project are landscape irrigation return flows. Runoff from the site will flow through the
porous pavers and also toward the proposed inlet and water quality pond. The project is
within the City’s Spring Creek Master Basin. The area drains directly into Spring Creek.
6
3. BMPS FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
3.1. Erosion and Sediment Controls
Structural Practices: Structural practices for the site will consist mainly of concrete
washout structure, vehicle tracking pad, sediment trap, inlet protection, erosion logs and
gravel bags which are described in detail in the following paragraphs. Detail drawings of
these BMPs are also included in Appendix A. These BMPs are expected to change as the
construction progresses and it is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure appropriate
BMPs are in place and/or removed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence.
All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices must be maintained
and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. All
BMPs shall be inspected and repaired or replaced as indicated in Section 6 and as
required to satisfy the conditions of the Permit.
Concrete washout structure is intended to contain washout liquids and solids that result
from the cleaning of concrete trucks and pumps. Washouts should be placed near the
area where the concrete is being poured.
Vehicle tracking pad is intended to trap mud and sediment within coarse grain material
and provide clean access to public roadways. Wherever construction vehicle access routes
intersect paved public roads a vehicle tracking control pad shall be installed to minimize
the transport of sediment (mud) by runoff or vehicles tracking onto the paved surface.
Pads shall be maintained and refurbished when necessary to obtain their intended result.
Sediment traps are designed to capture drainage from disturbed areas and allow settling of
sediment. The sediment trap shall be placed in the water quality pond. Inspect the
sediment trap embankments for stability and seepage. Remove accumulated sediment as
needed to maintain the effectiveness of the sediment trap, typically when the sediment
depth is approximately one-half the height of the outflow embankment. Inspect the outlet
for debris and damage. Repair damage to the outlet and remove all obstructions. A
sediment trap should not be removed until the upstream area is sufficiently stabilized.
Upon removal of the trap, the disturbed area should be covered with topsoil and
stabilized.
7
Inlet protection, erosion logs and gravel bags prevent sediment from entering storm
drainage systems prior to permanent stabilization of the disturbed site area via ponding
and settling of sediment. Inlet protection shall be placed at inlets on site as inlet
protection. Storm inlet protection must be inspected and maintained after every rainfall
event that produces runoff. Sediment must be removed and rocks replaced. Erosion logs
shall be used at flared end sections and along the swales. Gravel bag wattles shall be
used as flow line protection along proposed curb & gutter on the site and along the
upstream side of the pervious pavement.
Non-Structural Practices: If there are any low sloped areas exposed during land
disturbing activity (stripping, grading, utility installations, stockpiling, filling, etc.) they
shall be kept in a roughened condition by ripping or disking along land contours until
mulch, vegetation or other permanent erosion control is installed.
If there are any exposed steep sloped areas exposed during land disturbing activity
(stripping, grading, utility installations, stockpiling, filling, etc.) they shall have slope
protection. The contractor shall use a "tracked" vehicle, run perpendicular to slope so that
the tracking runs on the contour to inhibit rill/gully erosion; the contractor may use other
windrow-type methods as necessary.
No soil shall remain exposed by land disturbing activity for more than thirty (30) days.
At that time temporary or permanent erosion control seed/mulch, landscaping, etc. is
required.
Additional Non-Structural Practices are strongly encouraged such as minimizing the
disturbance of soils and vegetation, providing educational materials on disposal
/recycling, spill prevention / clean up, identification and elimination of illicit discharges,
promotion of street sweeping and the development of public education programs.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADD ANY AND ALL BMP’S AND DETAILS
NEEDED FOR SEDIMENT/EROSION CONTROL.
8
3.2 Materials Handling and Spill Prevention
Potential impacts from significant materials and their handling are as follows:
Chemicals, cleaning substances, and petroleum products related to the construction will
be stored within the construction trailer or storage shed where it will not be in contact
with precipitation. No storage of these materials will be allowed outside.
Maintenance of equipment shall not take place on site. Fueling will be accomplished off-
site. Absorbent (kitty litter) will be in the construction trailer and applied on any spill
immediately and the dry material disposed of properly and legally.
All construction waste shall be disposed of in the available dumpsters throughout the
workday. Liquid wastes will be hauled off site and disposed of properly and legally.
Any cleaning or maintenance of small equipment will be required to be done within a
containment device (horse trough or small “kiddy pool”) and the liquid disposed of
properly and legally.
In the event of any spill, the SWMP Administrator shall be immediately notified.
Spills can be broken into three categories. Their definitions and the procedures required
to address the spills are as follow:
Minor Spill – A spill generally of less than 5 gallons which is unlikely to reach adjacent
waters (i.e. equipment leak).
Procedure:
a. Stop the source of the spill.
b. Contain the spillage.
c. Contact the SWMP Administrator.
d. Clean up the spill with on-site absorbent material (kitty litter)
e. Dispose of the dry material properly or legally.
f. Document the spill and the response in the SWMP including dates
and times – verify that the pollutants are completely cleaned up.
g. Include incident in the following training meeting.
h. Provide information to the City of Fort Collins at the next regular
inspection.
9
Significant Spill – A spill of pollutants or oils of any size that will likely or has reached
adjacent waters, may endanger health or the environment, or which may exceed a water
quality standard.
Procedure:
a. Stop the source of the spill.
b. Contain the spillage.
c. Contact the SWMP Administrator.
d. Clean up the spill with on-site absorbent material (kitty litter)
e. Dispose of the dry material properly and legally.
f. Document the spill and the response in the SWMP – verify that the
pollutants are completely cleaned up.
g. Notify the City of Fort Collins (970) 221-6700 and the Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment spill reporting line
(877) 518-5608 of the spill.
h. Notify the same two entities above with a written submission
(outlined within the permit) within 5 calendar days.
i. Include incident in the following training meeting.
Hazardous Spill – A spill of a dangerous substance requiring expert cleanup.
Procedure:
a. Secure the area – do not approach the spill.
b. Offer first aid to any injured parties.
c. Call 911 and describe the nature of the spill and any injuries.
d. If possible, isolate downstream areas from the spill (for example,
cover an inlet that is downstream and a safe distance from the spill
with plastic and soil).
e. Contact the SWMP Administrator.
f. Document the spill and the response in the SWMP
g. Notify the City of Fort Collins (970) 221-6700 and the Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment spill reporting line
(877) 518-5608 of the spill.
h. Notify the same two entities above with a written submission
(outlined within the permit) within 5 calendar days.
i. Include incident in the following training meeting.
10
4. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS
4.1. SWMP Administrator
The Local Contact and SWMP Administrator is (INSERT CONTACT NAME,
POSITION, COMPANY, AND PHONE NUMBER).
(INSERT CONTACT) will be responsible for developing, implementing, maintaining,
and revising the SWMP. (INSERT CONTACT) will also be responsible for required
inspections and coordinating and documenting changes or repairs resulting from
inspections. (INSERT CONTACT) will be responsible for the training and enforcement
aspects of the SWMP and he is the first point of contact for any stormwater issues.
4.2. Identification of Potential Pollution Sources
The permit identifies 13 potential sources that must be evaluated for their potential to
contribute pollutants to stormwater discharge. These items have been evaluated below
for this project:
1) Disturbed and stored soil – YES – The construction will require that areas
be disturbed exposing soil including foundation construction, paving and
repaving, slope construction, and demolition required as shown on the
plans. BMPs will include the sediment trap, and erosion logs, gravel bags
or inlet protection on existing and proposed inlets, proposed flared end
section and existing concrete pan, minimizing disturbance of existing
vegetation and hard surfaces, and slope roughening and tracking of slopes
after disturbance and prior to landscaping, paving, or building will be
implemented.
2) Vehicle tracking of sediment – YES – The construction will require that
subgrade be prepared for pavement and that vehicles drive on unpaved
surfaces to the proposed buildings and utility improvement locations.
BMPs will include a policy that vehicles be clean prior to entering the site
and, if they become muddy during construction or earthwork activities,
mud is removed by hand from the vehicle prior to departing the site in an
area near the vehicle tracking pad. Any soil that is tracked from the site is
to be disposed of in the trash dumpster by sweeping or scraping the
material off the street. Any muddy vehicle will use the vehicle tracking
pad prior to leaving the site.
3) Management of contaminated soil – NO – Soil borings do not indicate any
existing contamination. If encountered, dispose of material properly and
legally.
11
4) Loading and unloading operations – YES – Chemicals and petroleum
products will be brought to the site. Anytime these are being transported,
they will be in a sealed container.
5) Outdoor storage activities – YES – Inert materials such as wood and stone
will be stored outside and will likely be covered with tarps or plastic, but
are not pollutant sources and are not covered by the permit. Chemicals
and petroleum products will be stored within the construction trailer or
storage shed. Cement and mortar bags (if not contained in a vehicle or
storage shed) will be completely covered with plastic to avoid contact with
precipitation.
6) Vehicle and equipment maintenance and fueling – YES – Vehicle
maintenance and fueling will take place. No fuel will be stored on site.
7) Significant dust or particulate generating processes – NO – The area of
heavy construction is very limited; however, in order to control the dust or
particulate generating process, a water truck or similar watering device
will be available at all times.
8) Routine maintenance activities involving fertilizers, pesticides, detergents,
fuels, solvents, oils, etc. – YES – Fertilizers and pesticides will not be
used. Any cleaning or maintenance of small equipment will be required to
be done within a containment device (horse trough or small “kiddy pool”
and the liquid disposed of properly and legally.
9) On-site waste management – YES – The site construction will result in
construction waste. A dumpster for trash and a dumpster for bulk
recycling will be on the site. Waste will be hauled to the dumpsters by
hand or in loaders. Dumpsters will be hauled off as needed. No
construction waste will be left outside overnight without being located in a
dumpster. No construction debris (including broken concrete) may be
buried on the site.
10) Concrete truck/equipment washing – YES – One mobile concrete washout
will be provided on site. This will be used for trucks and for any
masonry/concrete tools.
11) Dedicated asphalt of concrete batch plants – NO – None on this project.
12) Non-structural waste sources such as worker trash and portable toilets –
YES –Trash dumpster will be available for worker’s trash and will be
located near the construction trailer and emptied weekly. Portable toilets
will be staked on site near the construction trailer.
13) Other areas where potential spills can occur – NO – The above 12 items
are adequate for the anticipated construction process.
CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE THE ABOVE INFORMATION WITH EXACT
LOCATIONS OF THE CONCRETE WASHOUT, DUMPSTERS, AND PORTABLE
TOILETS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND UPDATED AS
NECESSARY THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
12
5. FINAL STABILIZATION AND LONG TERM STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
Long-term erosion control for this site will be the established vegetative cover,
landscaping and xeriscaping along with the completed site improvements (pavement and
buildings).
All disturbed areas will be paved, sodded or mulched.
The soil in such areas shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8)
inches; and soil amendments shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of such areas
to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of
at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of
area to be planted, unless at least four (4) inches of loose top soil has been placed on the
area after completion of construction activity on top of not less than four (4) inches of
loosened subgrade soils.
Final stabilization shall be considered achieved once the over-lot grading is complete and
all vegetation is established. Vegetation shall not be considered established until a
ground cover is achieved which is demonstrated to be mature enough to control soil
erosion (70% of the original vegetative cover of 100%).
13
6. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE
Site inspections will be performed to effectively address maintenance, repair, and
adequacy of BMPs. The site inspections will be performed by the SWMP Administrator
or his designee a minimum of once every fourteen (14) calendar days on active
construction sites and within 24 hours after a significant storm event (event causing
erosion). As part of the site inspections the inspector will keep documentation of all
inspections and BMP maintenance, including updated Site Maps indicating new BMPs or
the removal of BMPs since the previous inspection. Blank Site Maps will be utilized and
will be redlined by the SWMP Administrator throughout construction to note all BMPs,
pollutant sources, storage locations, etc.
Any maintenance, repair, or necessary installation of BMPs that are noted during the
inspection must begin immediately. The modifications shall be noted in the SWMP and
the action taken as a result of the inspection shall be noted and certified on or attached to
the original inspection report (date and time that the repair or change was started and
finished and a certification that it was done properly).
6.1. City of Fort Collins Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Notes
1) The City Stormwater Department erosion control inspector must be notified at
least 24 hours prior to any construction on this site.
2) All required BMPs shall be installed prior to any land disturbing activity
(stockpiling, stripping, grading, etc.). All of their required erosion control
measures shall be installed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence as
indicated in the approved project schedule, construction plans, and erosion control
report.
3) Pre-disturbance vegetation shall be protected and retained wherever possible.
Removal or disturbance of existing vegetation shall be limited to the area required
for immediate construction operations, and for the shortest practical period of
time.
4) All soils exposed during land disturbing activity (stripping, grading, stockpiling,
filling, etc.) shall be kept in a roughened condition by ripping or disking along
land contours until mulch, vegetation, or other permanent erosion control is
14
installed. No soils in areas outside project street rights of way shall remain
exposed by land disturbing activity for more than thirty (30) days before required
temporary or permanent erosion control (e.g. seed/mulch, landscaping, etc.) is
installed, unless otherwise approved by the Stormwater Department.
5) The project must be watered and maintained at all times during construction
activities so as to prevent wind-caused erosion. All land disturbing activities shall
be immediately discontinued when fugitive dust impacts adjacent properties, as
determined by the City Engineering Department.
6) All temporary (structural) erosion control measures must be inspected and
repaired or reconstructed as necessary after each runoff event and every 14 days in
order to assure continued performance of their intended function. All retained
sediments, particularly those on paved roadway surfaces, shall be removed and
disposed of in a manner and location so as not to cause their release into any
drainage way.
7) No stockpile shall exceed ten (10) feet in height. All soil stockpiles shall be
protected from sediment transport by surface roughening, watering, and perimeter
silt fencing. Any soil stockpile remaining after 30 days shall be seeded and
mulched.
8) City Ordinance prohibits the tracking, dropping, or depositing of soils or any other
material onto city streets by or from any vehicle. Any inadvertent deposited
material shall be cleaned immediately by the contractor.
6.2. City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Security Calculations
The cost of erosion control for the site was compared to the cost to reseed the entire site
and the greater cost was used to establish the erosion control escrow amount. The cost to
reseed the site is estimated at $4,950.00. Using a multiplier of 1.5 the erosion control
escrow amount would be $7,425.00. The site erosion control cost is estimated at
$15,800.00. Using a multiplier of 1.5 the erosion control escrow amount would be
$23,700.00. The larger sum of the Erosion Control cost and the Reseeding cost shall be
used for the escrow account. Therefore, the Erosion Control Escrow amount is
$23,700.00. See Table 6.1 for a break-down of the costs associated with seeding and
erosion control.
15
Table 6.1: Erosion Control Cost Estimate
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST/UNIT TOTAL COST
Inlet Protection (IP) 2 EA $ 150.00 $ 300.00
Sediment Trap (ST) 1 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
Gravel Bag Curb Protection (GB) 136 EA $ 75.00 $ 10,200.00
Erosion Log (EL) 10 EA $ 150.00 $ 1,500.00
Concrete Washout (CW) 1 EA $ 800.00 $ 800.00
Vehicle Tracking Pad (VTP) 1 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
Subtotal $ 15,800.00
Contingency (50%) $ 7,900.00
Total $ 23,700.00
CITY RESEEDING COST
Reseed/Mulch 3.3 ACRE $ 1,500.00 $ 4,950.00
Subtotal $ 4,950.00
Contingency (50%) $ 2,475.00
Total $ 7,425.00
CALCULATED EROSION CONTROL ESCROW AMOUNT $23,700
Note: Minimum Escrow Amount is $3,000.
16
7. SWMP IMPLEMENTATION
It is the responsibility of the contractor to operate and maintain all facilities and systems
of treatment and control which are installed to achieve compliance with the conditions of
the permit. This includes effective performance, adequate funding, adequate staffing and
training, etc. (see permit).
All personnel on the construction site who will be in a position to affect or be affected by
the SWMP shall be trained prior to beginning work. These individuals will be given
general orientation information regarding the project and SWMP, shown where the
SWMP is physically located, the SWMP will be explained to them and available for their
review, and the enforcement policy will be reviewed. After this training, a certification
that the employee or subcontractor’s employee is familiar with the document and its
procedures will be signed. Copies of these certifications are included in the Appendix.
Throughout the construction, as a part of a weekly safety meeting, the SWMP will be
reviewed with all attendees and any incidents discussed. All attendees shall be logged.
APPENDIX A—BMP DETAILS
B
APPENDIX B—EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C
APPENDIX C—CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
Mobilization Demolition Grading
Utilities
Installation
Flat work
Installation
Vertical
Installation Landscape Demobilization
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Structural "Installation"
Sediment Trap*
Contour Furrows (Ripping / Disking)
Concrete Washout Structure*
Vehicle Tracking Pad*
Flow Barriers (Wattles)*
Erosion Logs* Any prior inlets that could use protecting
Inlet Filter Bags* Any prior inlets that could use protecting
Gravel Bags* Any prior inlets that could use protecting
Terracing
Collecting Asphalt / Concrete Saw Cutting Waste
*All BMPs to be Removed once Construction is Complete.
Vegetative
Temporary Seeding Planting Any time the site will sit dorment longer than 30 Days.
Mulching/Sealant Any time the site will sit dorment longer than 30 Days.
Permanent Seeding Planting
Sod Installation
Other:
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE CHART
D
APPENDIX D—SOIL INFORMATION
Wind Erodibility Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado
(900 E. Stuart)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 1 of 3
4490290 4490320 4490350 4490380 4490410 4490440 4490470 4490500 4490530 4490560
4490290 4490320 4490350 4490380 4490410 4490440 4490470 4490500 4490530 4490560
494640 494670 494700 494730 494760 494790 494820
494640 494670 494700 494730 494760 494790 494820
40° 33' 56'' N
105° 3' 48'' W
40° 33' 56'' N
105° 3' 39'' W
40° 33' 47'' N
105° 3' 48'' W
40° 33' 47'' N
105° 3' 39'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 20 40 80 120
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,350 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
1
2
3
4
4L
5
6
7
8
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
1
2
3
4
4L
5
6
7
8
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
1
2
3
4
4L
5
6
7
8
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Wind Erodibility Group
Wind Erodibility Group— Summary by Map Unit — Larimer County Area, Colorado (CO644)
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
4 Altvan-Satanta loams, 3
to 9 percent slopes
5 0.9 21.1%
55 Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent
slopes
4L 2.1 48.4%
76 Nunn clay loam, wet, 1 to
3 percent slopes
6 0.6 13.9%
95 Satanta loam, 1 to 3
percent slopes
5 0.2 3.9%
101 Stoneham loam, 1 to 3
percent slopes
6 0.6 12.7%
Totals for Area of Interest 4.4 100.0%
Description
A wind erodibility group (WEG) consists of soils that have similar properties
affecting their susceptibility to wind erosion in cultivated areas. The soils assigned
to group 1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, and those assigned to group
8 are the least susceptible.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Lower
Wind Erodibility Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado 900 E. Stuart
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 3 of 3
K Factor, Whole Soil—Larimer County Area, Colorado
(900 E. Stuart)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 1 of 3
4490290 4490320 4490350 4490380 4490410 4490440 4490470 4490500 4490530 4490560
4490290 4490320 4490350 4490380 4490410 4490440 4490470 4490500 4490530 4490560
494640 494670 494700 494730 494760 494790 494820
494640 494670 494700 494730 494760 494790 494820
40° 33' 56'' N
105° 3' 48'' W
40° 33' 56'' N
105° 3' 39'' W
40° 33' 47'' N
105° 3' 48'' W
40° 33' 47'' N
105° 3' 39'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 20 40 80 120
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,350 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
.02
.05
.10
.15
.17
.20
.24
.28
.32
.37
.43
.49
.55
.64
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
.02
.05
.10
.15
.17
.20
.24
.28
.32
.37
.43
.49
.55
.64
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
.02
.05
.10
.15
.17
.20
.24
.28
.32
.37
.43
.49
.55
.64
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
K Factor, Whole Soil
K Factor, Whole Soil— Summary by Map Unit — Larimer County Area, Colorado (CO644)
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
4 Altvan-Satanta loams, 3
to 9 percent slopes
.28 0.9 21.1%
55 Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent
slopes
.28 2.1 48.4%
76 Nunn clay loam, wet, 1 to
3 percent slopes
.24 0.6 13.9%
95 Satanta loam, 1 to 3
percent slopes
.32 0.2 3.9%
101 Stoneham loam, 1 to 3
percent slopes
.28 0.6 12.7%
Totals for Area of Interest 4.4 100.0%
Description
Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by
water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE)
and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) to predict the average
annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The
estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and
on soil structure and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat). Values of K range from
0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being equal, the higher the value, the more susceptible
the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water.
"Erosion factor Kw (whole soil)" indicates the erodibility of the whole soil. The
estimates are modified by the presence of rock fragments.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Layer Options (Horizon Aggregation Method): Surface Layer (Not applicable)
K Factor, Whole Soil—Larimer County Area, Colorado 900 E. Stuart
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 3 of 3
Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado
(900 E. Stuart)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 1 of 4
4490290 4490320 4490350 4490380 4490410 4490440 4490470 4490500 4490530 4490560
4490290 4490320 4490350 4490380 4490410 4490440 4490470 4490500 4490530 4490560
494640 494670 494700 494730 494760 494790 494820
494640 494670 494700 494730 494760 494790 494820
40° 33' 56'' N
105° 3' 48'' W
40° 33' 56'' N
105° 3' 39'' W
40° 33' 47'' N
105° 3' 48'' W
40° 33' 47'' N
105° 3' 39'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 20 40 80 120
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,350 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado
Hydrologic Soil Group
Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Larimer County Area, Colorado (CO644)
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
4 Altvan-Satanta loams, 3
to 9 percent slopes
B 0.9 21.1%
55 Kim loam, 5 to 9 percent
slopes
B 2.1 48.4%
76 Nunn clay loam, wet, 1 to
3 percent slopes
C 0.6 13.9%
95 Satanta loam, 1 to 3
percent slopes
B 0.2 3.9%
101 Stoneham loam, 1 to 3
percent slopes
B 0.6 12.7%
Totals for Area of Interest 4.4 100.0%
Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado 900 E. Stuart
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 3 of 4
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado 900 E. Stuart
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 4 of 4
Survey Area Data: Version 9, Sep 22, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 22, 2011—Nov 18,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Hydrologic Soil Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado
(900 E. Stuart)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 2 of 4
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado
Survey Area Data: Version 9, Sep 22, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 22, 2011—Nov
18, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
K Factor, Whole Soil—Larimer County Area, Colorado
(900 E. Stuart)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 2 of 3
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado
Survey Area Data: Version 9, Sep 22, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 22, 2011—Nov 18,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Wind Erodibility Group—Larimer County Area, Colorado
(900 E. Stuart)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/18/2015
Page 2 of 3