Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASCENT STUDIO CLIMBING & FITNESS - FDP - FDP150023 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - REVISIONSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview June 22, 2015 Joe Hosek RB+B Architects 315 E. Mountain Ave., Ste 100 Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Ascent Studio Climbing and Fitness Major Amendment, MJA140003, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or nbeals@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/19/2014 08/19/2014: The lighting plan needs to include the average foot candle for the vehicle use area (parking stalls and drive aisle). RB+B Response: This is shown on sheet PM.2 in the Statistics Table under item “Stat Zone #2”. Are there three different light fixtures? RB+B Response: There is only one pole light that has (3) three different light distribution optics. Are there any light fixtures mounted to the building? RB+B Response: Corrected. See revised Photometric drawing. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 09/16/2014 09/16/2014: Please include the visual and height analysis sheet in the sheet index. RB+B Response: Corrected. See revised Index. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 09/11/2014 09/15/2014: Please add the following Street Cut note to the Utility Plans: "Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the filed by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards." RB+B Response: This street cut has been eliminated from this project. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please label the size of the proposed water fire line connection in Joseph Allen Drive. RB+B Response: Size of line has been added to the Utility Plan Sheet C10.0; Water/fire sprinkler line has been relocated to not connect in Joseph Allen Drive. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please add the LCUASS Curb and Gutter Construction drawing detail 701 to the Utility Plans. Since a section of the curb and gutter along Joseph Allen Drive will be removed with the installation of the water line, it must be replaced using City standards. RB+B Response: Detail is no longer needed per relocation of fireline. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: How will the drainage in the east of the parking lot be conveyed to the existing inlet near Lot 10? It appears that the transition from the proposed edge of asphalt to the existing edge of asphalt might be an issue. Please work with Stormwater Engineering for a solution. Responses pending Owner input RB+B Response: Asphalt now extends to existing edge of asphalt. See revised Utility and Drainage Plans. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 09/17/2014 09/17/2014: Please show on the Utility Plans that the gas line to the west of the building will be removed by private utility company and what section of the water line will either be abandoned and/or removed. RB+B Response: The buildling has been shifted to meet required clearances between the building and the gasline. Labeling has been added regarding extent of wateline to be removed. See revised Utility and Drainage Plans. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/27/2014 08/27/2014: No comments. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/19/2014 09/19/2014: Indian Magic crabapple is shown along the front of the building near the sidewalk. This cultivar of Crabapple develops a low and horizontal canopy. Consider changing these four Indian Magic Crabapples to Red Barron crabapple that has an upright growth form and will not tend to conflict with the sidewalk usage. RB+B Response: Corrected. See revised Landscape Plans. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/20/2014 08/20/2014: Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting Pre-Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2011 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Fort Collins Green Code Amendments effective starting 1-1-2012. A copy of these requirements can be obtained at the Building Office or contact the above phone number. Ascent – project specific concerns: 1. Fire-sprinkler systems are required for buildings larger than 5000 sq.ft.. 2. New Green Code requires: a. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling. b. Exterior walls and roof must meet a STC (sound resistance) rating of 40 min. if building located within 1000ft to train tracks. c. Low-flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required. d. Special combustion safety requirements for natural draft gas appliances. e. Low VOC interior finishes. City of Fort Collins Building Services Plan Review 416-2341 RB+B Response: Acknowledged. Contact: Todd Reidenbach, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/06/2014 08/06/2014: 1. Addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. Todd Reidenbach, GISP GIS Mapping Specialist treidenbach@fcgov.com 970.416.2483 Work RB+B Response: Acknowledged. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/16/2014 09/16/2014: PAVERS Fire lanes shall be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface capable of supporting 40 tons. Private drives incorporating pavers as surface for fire lanes shall confirm the cross-section design of the drive aisle can support fire truck loading. RB+B Response: Pavers have been designed as such. See Paver Section Details. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. The current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. See redlines for corrections in the Erosion Control Plan. The Erosion Control Report (Stormwater Management Control) was not submitted therefore did not meet City Erosion Control Requirements nor State SWMP requirements. The Site will also have to supply an Erosion Control Escrow Calculations. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com RB+B Response: Plans and reports have been updated accordingly. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/16/2014 09/16/2014: Stormwater is ready for a hearing. RB+B Response: Acknowledged. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/16/2014 09/16/2014: At final, the drainage needs to be addressed that flows to the northeast inlet by Lot 10. There is a gap in the asphalt. This creates erosion and sediment concerns. City recommends paving this strip to mitigate this issue. Responses pending Owner input RB+B Response: Asphalt now extends to existing edge of asphalt. See revised Utility and Drainage Plans. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please state the project datum, and provide an equation to get from NAVD88 to NGVD29 Unadjusted, i.e. NAVD88 = NGVD29 Unadjusted + _______. Also, add (Unadjusted) to NGVD29. See redlines. 08/15/2014: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum. Please provide elevations for both the NAVD88 & NGVD29 (Unadjusted) datums, state the project datum, and provide an equation to get from NAVD88 to NGVD29 Unadjusted, i.e. NAVD88 = NGVD29 Unadjusted + _______. RB+B Response: Surveyor of record (Northern Engineering) has provided updated benchmarks and equation information as shown on cover sheet. Please use the November 2013 publishing of the City Of Fort Collins Vertical Control Network. The elevation of 17-92 has changed, and we have not had E357 in our network since 2003. RB+B Response: Surveyor of record (Northern Engineering) has provided updated benchmarks and equation information as shown on cover sheet. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please mask the text marked on sheet 7. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. 08/15/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 08/15/2014 09/15/2014: There are still line over text issues. See redlines. 08/15/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 08/15/2014 09/15/2014: There is still text that needs to be masked. See redlines. 08/15/2014: Please mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please remove the "Site" from the title. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please remove the dashes from the sheet numbers, or add dashes to the index on sheet AS101. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Unless another department requested the text shown, we recommend that it all be removed to clean up the plan. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: The Timberline Center plat shows Lots 11, 12 & 13 adding up to 126,541 sq. ft. Please adjust your legal description to reflect the original square footages. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please make the Basis Of Bearings text larger on sheet 2. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Is there a record bearing for the 24.26' line along the north side of Lot 1? See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please remove the "Site" from the sheet L101 title. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Please add dashes to the index for sheets L101 & L102, or remove the dashes from those sheet numbers. See redlines. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/19/2014 09/16/2014: The revised plan now shows a sidewalk along the southern edge of the property. Please check to see if the 90 degree jogs are allowable by ADA. The assumption that the comprehensive east/west pedestrian connection will occur on the parcel to the north is not ideal, but acceptable. 08/19/2014: Transportation Planning staff has commented on a lack on internal pedestrian connectivity. Such as between the climbing studio and Burger King, there is no sidewalk to get from one to another - you have to cut through several parking lots. RB+B Response: The sidewalk has moved to the middle of the parking. See Site Plan. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/16/2014 09/16/2014: The asphalt drive aisles on the eastern end seem to be double landscaping bulbouts. Can you elaborate on how / why this is? Is ther asphalt all the way to the east property line? RB+B Response: Improvements regarding bulbouts not part of this project. It is the responsibility of the property owner to coordinate these items. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/19/2014 09/15/2014: Label the re-routed water main as D.I.P. 08/19/2014: The existing water main material within this development is D.I.P.; therefore, the re-route of the existing main must also be D.I.P. Add appropriate labels and notes. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: At final, include the lengths of the new water main between valves, fittings, etc. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: See redlined utility plans for other comments and revisions to labeling. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 09/15/2014 09/15/2014: Show the water/sewer lines on the landscape plan and adjust plantings to meet required separation distances. RB+B Response: Corrected. See Drawings.