Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBROWNS ON HOWES - PDP/FDP - FDP140019 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORTITEM NO _________________ HEARING DATE January 22, 2015 _ STAFF Seth Lorson__ ____ ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING Planning Services 281 N College Ave – PO Box 580 – Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 fcgov.com/developmentreview/ 970.221.6750 STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 APPLICANT: Christian and Robin Bachelet Maxiimo Development 706 South College Avenue #201 Fort Collins CO, 80524 OWNER: Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project proposes to construct six single-family attached dwelling units in two 3-story buildings. The buildings are oriented with front doors facing south in a row house style connected with a common sidewalk. Each unit will have a two-car garage, and outdoor patio space along the south side and on the roof. Access will be provided by a through- drive connecting Howes Street to the alley. The site (315 North Howes) is located directly north of the “Terracon” building at the northwest corner of Howes and Maple Streets (301 North Howes) which currently houses Northern Engineering. Directly north of the development site is a single-family detached house (323 North Howes) which was built in 1932 but is not individually eligible for landmark designation. The entire block is located in the Downtown (D) District – Civic Center Sub-district and the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay Zone. Single-family attached dwellings with up to four units per building are permitted in the Downtown District by administrative review by a Hearing Officer (Type 1). The project is requesting two Modifications of Standards: 1. Use of cement fiber lap siding on the third story façade (Sec. 4.16(D)(5)(e)); and 2. Side setback reduction for the drive aisle from 5 feet to 1’-4” (Sec. 3.2.2(J)). Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Brownes on Howes FDP #140019. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The proposed design is a result of many iterations of site context and best practices review, examination of code requirements and, input from multiple design professionals. The developer utilized the City’s Historic Preservation Design Assistance program which provides funding to resource an approved architect. The buildings’ design is in the tradition of the brownstone row houses prominent in East Coast cities, notably New York and Boston. The front doors are oriented toward the office building (south) and united by a common sidewalk and a consistent pattern of steps and porches creating covered stoops both vertically up to the front door and down to the guest patio. The front of each unit has a protruding bay window box framed in a smooth cement fiber trim as seen in historic brownstones. The buildings are proposed to be constructed primarily of brick with accents of precast concrete, metal railings, and cement fiber lap siding. The site is located at the edge of the Downtown District abutting a historic single-family neighborhood. This edge condition requires a special sensitivity to the Downtown civic and commercial fabric to the east and the historic residential pattern to the west. The use of brick on the first two stories and lap siding on the third gives a nod to each of the prominent patterns contributing to the area’s character. Staff finds that the proposed development complies with all standards of the land use code, most notably Section 3.5.1 Building and Project Compatibility, with the exception of the requested modification of standards which are considered nominal and inconsequential when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan. COMMENTS: 1. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses. Surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 3 Direction Zone District Existing Land Uses North Downtown (D) & Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB) Residential: Single-family detached South Downtown (D) Office: “Terracon” building & Civic: City Hall East Downtown (D) Civic: City Trolley Barn & Retail: Eco Thrift West Downtown (D) & Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB) Residential: Single-family detached 2. Compliance with Division 4.16 - Applicable Downtown Zone District Standards. Staff finds that the Brownes on Howes complies with the applicable standards in Division 4.16 Downtown District – Civic Center Subdistrict, as explained below. Section 4.16 (A) Purpose: The purpose of the Downtown District is as follows: 315 North Howes St. Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 4 The Downtown District is intended to provide a concentration of retail, civic, office and cultural uses in addition to complementary uses such as hotels, entertainment and housing. It is divided into three (3) subdistricts as depicted on Figure 18. The development standards for the Downtown District are intended to encourage a mix of activity in the area while providing for quality development that maintains a sense of history, human scale and pedestrian-oriented character. • The proposed buildings contribute to the downtown’s housing stock and maintain the historic human scale and pedestrian-oriented character. Section 4.16(B) - Permitted Use: The proposed single-family attached dwellings (up to four units per building) are permitted in the Downtown District by administrative review by a Hearing Officer (Type 1). Section 4.16(D) – Building Standards: (1) Setback from Streets. This standard requires a “landscaped setback” for all block faces west of Mason Street. • The proposed frontage along Howes Street has a robustly landscaped area with grass turf, ornamental grasses, evergreen and deciduous shrubs, perennials, and a deciduous tree. (2) Building Height. The maximum building height for this block is 3 – 4 stories, +/- 45 feet. • The proposed buildings are 3 stories, 38 feet in height. (5) Building Character and Facades. This standard requires that buildings have architectural interest, encourage outdoor activity, and are constructed with high- quality materials. • The proposed buildings are constructed primarily of brick with accents of precast concrete, metal railings, and cement fiber lap siding. The use of cement fiber lap siding requires a modification to this standard (4.16(D)(5)(e)) which is discussed later in the staff report. Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 5 • The buildings incorporate a courtyard patio on the ground floor, a covered stoop on the second level, a terrace on the third level along the south side, and roof decks to encourage outdoor activity and interaction. • Each unit is offset from the next with vertical articulation, clearly identified stoops, and bay windows framed in protruding window boxes. A three-dimensional cornice is featured atop the roofs and the window boxes to provide architectural interest. 3. Compliance with Article Three – General Development Standards: Staff finds that Brownes on Howes complies with the applicable General Development Standards, as explained below. Section 3.2.1 – Landscaping and Tree Protection: Standards in this section require a fully developed landscape plan that addresses relationships of landscaping to the street, the building, abutting properties, and users on site. • All areas of the site not paved for pedestrian and vehicular access are landscaped. • Two Siberian Elm trees are proposed to be preserved: one 13” caliper & one 7” caliper. The 13” tree is in the planting strip between the sidewalk and Howes Street and another street tree will be planted along the Howes frontage to comply with the street tree standard. Section 3.2.2 – Access, Circulation and Parking: Standards in this section require safe, convenient, efficient, parking and circulation improvements that add to the attractiveness of the development. Attached dwellings in the TOD Overlay Zone are required to provide 1.4 parking spaces per 3-bedroom unit. • The project proposes six 3-bedroom units requiring a total of 8.4 parking spaces. Each unit contains a 2-car garage providing a total of 12 parking spaces. Section 3.2.2(C)(4) – Bicycle Parking Space Requirements: This standard requires at least one bicycle parking space per bedroom for a total of 18 spaces. 60% or 10.8 spaces must be enclosed and 40% or 7.2 spaces must be fixed (meaning traditional exterior bicycle racks). Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 6 • The project is providing 3 bicycle parking spaces in each garage for a total of 18 enclosed bicycle parking spaces; and 8 fixed bicycle parking spaces for a project total of 26 bicycle parking spaces. Section 3.2.4 – Site Lighting: The purpose of this section is for a project to ensure that the functional and security needs of a project are met in a way that does not adversely affect the adjacent properties and neighborhood. • All lighting is down-directional with cutoff fixtures. No foot-candles levels exceed one-tenth as measured 20 feet from property lines as required under this standard. Section 3.4.7 – Historic and Cultural Resources Section 3.4.7 (F)(6) states: “In its consideration of the approval of plans for properties containing or adjacent to sites, structure, objects or districts that: (a) have been deter- mined to be or potentially be individually eligible for local landmark designation or for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Properties, or (b) are officially designated as a local or state landmark or are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or (c) are located within a officially designated national, state or local historic district or area, the decision maker shall receive and consider a written recommendation from the Landmark Preservation Commission unless the Director has issued a written determination that the plans would not have a significant impact on the individual eligibility or potential individual eligibility of the site, structure, object or district.” • The Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services has reviewed the proposed plans for the project at 315 North Howes Street and determined the project will not have a significant impact on the individual eligibility or potential individual eligibility of adjacent sites. Section 3.5.1 – Building and Project Compatibility: Standards in this Section require compatibility with the context of the surrounding area in terms of building size, massing proportions, design character and building materials. Where the established character of the relevant area is not definitively established, or is not consistent with the purposes of the Land Use Code, projects must set an enhanced standard appropriate for the area. Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 7 • The project site is in the Downtown District but is at the edge of a commercial- civic area and the adjacent single-family residential neighborhood. Section 3.5.1(B) requires that building materials have color shades and textures similar to those existing in the immediate area of the proposed development. The project is primarily constructed with brick as seen in the abutting “Terracon” building, City Hall (north of Maple Street), and the Trolley Barn (east across Howes Street). The third story is constructed with a cement fiber lap siding which is indistinguishable from wood siding. Wood siding is found in all the single-family houses to the west and the house abutting to the north. • Section 3.5.1(C) requires that buildings shall either be similar in size and height, or, if larger, be articulated and subdivided into massing that is proportional to the mass and scale of other structures on the block face. The buildings adjacent are one and two story in height and of varying size and character. The proposed buildings are three stories and incorporate features to reduce their sense of mass such as a strong two story break in material from a heavy brick to a light lap siding, and step backs on the third story in both the north and south directions. Section 3.5.2 – Residential Building Standards: This section is intended to promote variety, visual interest and pedestrian-oriented streets in residential development. • The required setback from Howes Street is 15 feet from the public right-of-way. The proposed buildings are setback 20’-8”. • In this section a high priority is placed on orienting building entryways toward adjacent streets. The easternmost unit orients its tiered stairwell toward Howes Street and provides a stoop abutting the sidewalk. Due to the long east-west shape of the lot and the need for vehicular access off of Howes, most of the units face onto a common sidewalk that runs along the south property line. 4. Compliance with Modification of Standards (Division 2.8) The decision maker is empowered to grant modifications to the General Development Standards contained in Article 3 and the Land Use Standards and Development Standards contained in Article 4 and any separation or proximity standards that are established as a specific measurement of distance in the District Permitted Uses contained in Article 4. In order to grant a modification of standard, the decision maker must find that the modification is not detrimental to the public good, and that: Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 8 (1) the plan as submitted will promote the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standard for which a modification is requested; or (2) the granting of a modification from the strict application of any standard would, without impairing the intent and purpose of this Land Use Code, substantially alleviate an existing, defined and described problem of city-wide concern or would result in a substantial benefit to the city by reason of the fact that the proposed project would substantially address an important community need specifically and expressly defined and described in the city's Comprehensive Plan or in an adopted policy, ordinance or resolution of the City Council, and the strict application of such a standard would render the project practically infeasible; or (3) by reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to such property, including, but not limited to, physical conditions such as exceptional narrowness, shallowness or topography, or physical conditions which hinder the owner's ability to install a solar energy system, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties, or exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner of such property, provided that such difficulties or hardship are not caused by the act or omission of the applicant; or (4) the plan as submitted will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use Code that are authorized by this Division to be modified except in a nominal, inconsequential way when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan, and will continue to advance the purposes of the Land Use Code as contained in Section 1.2.2. Modification Request – Section 4.16(D)(5)(e) The applicant requests a modification to the standard that reads: All street-facing facades shall be constructed of high quality exterior materials for the full height of the building. Such materials, with the exception of glazing, shall include stone, brick, clay units, terra cotta, architectural pre-cast concrete, cast stone, prefabricated brick panels, architectural metals or any combination thereof. The third story of the buildings are proposed to be constructed with a cement fiber lap siding. • Staff finds that the request is not detrimental to the public good, and that the granting of the modification will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use Code except in a nominal and inconsequential way (4). The vast majority of the buildings are proposed to be constructed with brick which is a permitted material. Additionally, the material modification lends to the project meeting other Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 9 standards in the code that reference compatibility with adjacent neighborhood character. Modification Request – Section 3.2.2(J) The applicant requests a modification to the standard that reads: Any vehicular use area containing six (6) or more parking spaces or one thousand eight hundred (1,800) or more square feet shall be set back from the street right-of-way and the side and rear yard lot line (except a lot line between buildings or uses with collective parking) consistent with the provisions of this Section, according to the following table: Minimum Average of Entire Landscaped Setback Area (feet) Minimum Width of Setback at Any Point (feet) Along an arterial street 15 5 Along a nonarterial street 10 5 Along a lot line * 5 5 The proposed landscape setback along the north property line and the vehicular drive aisle is an area that tapers from 2’-4” to 1’-4”. • Staff finds that the request is not detrimental to the public good, and that the granting of the modification will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use Code except in a nominal and inconsequential way (4). The area is proposed to utilize small trees, shrubs, and a vine-covered fence to provide a screen between the drive aisle and the neighboring property. Additionally, the site layout that proposes the drive aisle along the north edge of the property creates greater separation between the buildings and the residential neighbor’s property. In this site plan, the proposed buildings are 25 feet from the property line and 40 feet from the existing single-family house. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION: In evaluating the request for Brownes on Howes FDP #140019, staff makes the following finding of fact and conclusions: 1. The request for a modification of standard to permit use of cement fiber lap siding on the third story façade (Sec. 4.16(D)(5)(e)) is not detrimental to the public good, and that the granting of the modification will not diverge from the standards Brownes on Howes FDP #140019 Administrative Hearing January 22, 2015 Page 10 of the Land Use Code except in a nominal and inconsequential way as the majority of the buildings are constructed with permitted materials. 2. The request for a modification of standard to permit a side setback reduction for the drive aisle from 5 feet to 1’-4” (Sec. 3.2.2(J)) is not detrimental to the public good, and that the granting of the modification will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use Code except in a nominal and inconsequential way in that the proposal provides adequate buffering with fencing and landscape material and allows for a site plan that further separates the proposed building from the existing neighboring house. 3. The Project Development Plan contains permitted uses and complies with the applicable land development standards of the Downtown District – Civic Center Subdistrict in Article 4, Division 4.16 of the Land Use Code. 4. The Project Development Plan complies with the applicable General Development Standards of Article 3 of the Land Use Code with the exception of the requested modifications of standards. 5. The Project Development Plan complies with the applicable procedural and administrative requirements of Article 2 of the Land Use Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Brownes on Howes FDP #140019. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site, Landscape, and Photometric Plans 2. Building Elevations 3. Perspective Renderings 4. Modification Requests 5. Director Letter RE: Historic and Cultural Resource Section 3.4.7 (F)(6)