Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREGISTRY RIDGE SEVENTH FILING - REPLAT OF FILINGS TWO & FOUR - PDP - PDP140020 - REPORTS - TRAFFIC STUDY (3)REGISTRY RIDGE FILINGS 2 & 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO SEPTEMBER 2014 Prepared for: RC Ventures 10221 Prestwick Trail Lone Tree, CO 80124 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 Project #1465 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 2 Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 2 Roads .............................................................................................................................. 2 Existing Traffic ................................................................................................................. 2 Existing Operation ........................................................................................................... 7 Pedestrians Facilities ...................................................................................................... 7 Bicycle Facilities .............................................................................................................. 7 Transit Facilities .............................................................................................................. 7 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................. 9 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 9 Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................... 9 Background Traffic Projections ..................................................................................... 12 Trip Assignment ............................................................................................................ 12 Signal Warrants ............................................................................................................. 12 Operation Analysis ........................................................................................................ 12 Geometry ...................................................................................................................... 17 Pedestrian Level of Service ........................................................................................... 17 Bicycle Level of Service ................................................................................................ 17 Transit Level of Service ................................................................................................. 17 IV. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. 19 LIST OF TABLES 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .................................................................................... 8 2. Trip Generation ......................................................................................................... 9 3. Short Range (2019) Background Peak Hour Operation .......................................... 16 4. Short Range (2019) Total Peak Hour Operation ..................................................... 16 DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES LIST OF FIGURES 1. Site Location ............................................................................................................. 3 2. Existing Intersection Geometry.................................................................................. 4 3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic .......................................................................................... 5 4. Averaged Recent Peak Hour Traffic .......................................................................... 6 5. Site Plan .................................................................................................................. 10 6. Trip Distribution ....................................................................................................... 11 7. Short Range (2019) Background Vehicle Peak Hour Traffic ................................... 13 8. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ........................................................................... 14 9. Short Range (2019) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........................................................... 15 10. Short Range (2019) Geometry ................................................................................ 18 APPENDICES A. Base Assumptions Packet B. Recent Peak Hour Traffic C. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins LOS Standards D. Short Range (2019) Background Peak Hour Operation E. Short Range (2019) Total Peak Hour Operation F. Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES I. INTRODUCTION This intermediate transportation impact study (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4. The proposed Registry Ridge Filing 2 is located in the northwest quadrant and the proposed Registry Ridge Filing 4 is located in the southwest quadrant of the Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project civil engineer (United Civil Design Group, LLC) and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines contained in the “Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards” (LCUASS). Appendix A contains the Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form and related attachments for the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4. The study involved the following steps: • Collect physical, traffic, and development data; • Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; • Determine peak hour traffic volumes; • Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; • Analyze signal warrants; • Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily residential. There are residential uses to the north and west of the site. The center of Fort Collins lies to the north of the proposed Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic operations perspective. Roads The primary streets near Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site are Shields Street, Truxtun Drive and Bon Homme Richard Drive. The existing geometry at the key intersections is shown in Figure 2. Shields Street is to the east of the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site. It is classified as a four-lane arterial street according to the Fort Collins Master Street plan. Currently, Shields Street has one northbound through lane and two southbound through lanes. At the intersections, Shields Street has a northbound left-turn lane, one northbound through lane, two southbound through lanes, and a southbound right-turn lane. The Shields/Truxtun and Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersections have stop sign control on Truxtun Drive and Bon Homme Richard Drive. The existing speed limit in this area of Shields Street is 45 mph. Truxtun Drive and Bon Homme Richard Drive are classified as collector streets according to the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Truxtun Drive has a two-lane cross section and Bon Homme Richard Drive has a two-lane cross section plus center two-way left-turn lane. At the Shields/Truxtun and Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersections, Truxtun Drive and Bon Homme Richard Drive have separate eastbound left- turn and right-turn lanes. The Shields/Truxtun and Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersections have stop sign control on Truxtun Drive and Bon Homme Richard Drive, respectively. Existing Traffic Figure 3 shows recent peak hour traffic counts at the Shields/Truxtun and Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersections. Recent count data at the key intersections was obtained in August 2014. Raw count data is provided in Appendix B. Since counts were performed on different days, the volumes were averaged and are shown in Figure 4. DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 2 B. N. R.R. 287 Registry Ridge Filing 4 Trilby Shields Taft Hill Harmony Registry Ridge Filing 2 SCALE: 1"=2000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 3 EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Figure 2 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 4 Truxtun Shields Bon Homme Richard - Denotes Lane AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 5 Truxtun Shields Bon Homme Richard 16/31 844/608 15/45 424/825 37/33 27/20 4/8 886/609 23/53 473/799 31/32 7/7 AM/PM AVERAGED RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 6 Truxtun Shields Bon Homme Richard 16/31 849/596 15/45 445/793 37/33 27/20 4/8 882/621 23/53 453/831 31/32 7/7 DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 7 Existing Operation The Shields/Truxtun and Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersections were evaluated and the peak hour operation is displayed in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections are currently operating acceptably with existing control and geometry in the morning and afternoon peak hours. The intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (2010HCM). A description of level of service for unsignalized intersections from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site is in an area termed “low density mixed-use residential.” In areas termed “low density mixed-use residential,” acceptable operation at unsignalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service F or better overall for an arterial/collector or local intersection and level of service C for an arterial/arterial or collector/local intersection. Pedestrian Facilities There are pedestrian facilities along all the streets within and adjacent to Registry Ridge. There are also various trails through the open space areas within Registry Ridge. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle lanes exist within the cross section of Shields Street and Trilby Road. The Fort Collins Bike Map shows both Shields Street and Trilby Road as a “street with bike lanes.” There are also bicycle lanes on Truxtun Drive and Bon Homme Richard Drive. Transit Facilities This area is not served by transit. TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM Shields/Truxtun (stop sign) EB LT C C EB RT A B EB APPROACH C C NB LT A A Shields/Bon Homme Richard (stop sign) EB LT C C EB RT B B EB APPROACH C C NB LT A A DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 8 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 is a proposed residential development. Registry Ridge Filing 2 is proposed as 34 single family dwelling units (duplex). Registry Ridge Filing 4 is proposed as 48 single family dwelling units (40 duplex/8 detached). Figure 5 shows a site plan of Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4. Primary access to Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 will be via the existing full-movement Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersection and the existing full-movement Shields/Truxtun intersection. The short range analysis (Year 2019) includes development of the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site and an appropriate increase in background traffic, due to normal growth, and other approved developments in the area. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 9 th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected use at this site. Table 2 shows the daily and peak hour trip generation for Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4. Full development of Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 resulted in 924 daily weekday trip ends, 77 morning peak hour trip ends, and 94 afternoon peak hour trip ends. TABLE 2 Trip Generation Code Use Size AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out Filing 2 210 Single Family 34 D.U. EQ 389 EQ 9 EQ 25 EQ 25 EQ 15 Filing 4 210 Single Family 48 D.U. EQ 535 EQ 11 EQ 32 EQ 34 EQ 20 Total 924 20 57 59 35 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site by utilizing the existing turning movement counts at the Shields/Truxtun and Shields/Bon Homme Richard intersections. Figure 6 shows the vehicle trip distribution used for the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site. The trip distribution analysis was agreed to in the scoping emails. DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 9 SCALE: 1"=200' SITE PLANS FOR FILINGS 2 & 4 Figure 5 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 10 Trilby Shields 31% 69% Truxtun Bon Richard Homme Filing 4 Filing 2 SCALE: 1"=500' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 11 Background Traffic Projections Figure 7 shows the short range (2019) background peak hour traffic projections at the key intersections. The traffic on Shields Street was increased at a rate of two percent Registry Ridge Filing 5 was also included in the short range (2019) background forecasts. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Using the trip distribution shown in Figure 6, Figure 8 shows the assignment of the site generated peak hour vehicle traffic. The site generated vehicle traffic was combined with the background traffic to determine the total forecasted vehicle traffic at the key intersections. Figure 9 shows the short range (2019) total peak hour vehicle traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). None of the stop sign controlled intersections are expected to meet peak hour signal warrants. Operation Analysis Operation analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operation analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2019 condition. In the intersection operation tables, the calculated delay for each movement/leg is provided when the level of service falls in the LOS D/E/F categories. Using the short range (2019) background peak hour traffic volumes, the key intersections operate as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections operate acceptably with existing control and geometry in the morning and afternoon peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9, the key intersections operate in the short range (2019) total condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections operate similar to the background operation with existing control and geometry in the morning and afternoon peak hours. DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 12 AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2019) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 13 Truxtun Shields Bon Homme Richard 16/31 943/667 15/45 499/883 37/33 27/20 6/14 974/686 25/61 500/917 35/34 14/11 AM/PM SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 14 Truxtun Shields Bon Homme Richard 6/18 0/1 12/34 1/0 33/21 17/11 0/1 33/21 2/6 12/34 6/3 1/0 AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2019) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Page 15 Truxtun Shields Bon Homme Richard 22/49 943/668 27/79 500/883 70/54 44/31 6/15 1007/707 27/67 512/951 41/37 15/11 TABLE 3 Short Range (2019) Background Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM Shields/Truxtun (stop sign) EB LT C D (26.0 secs) EB RT B B EB APPROACH C C NB LT A B Shields/Bon Homme Richard (stop sign) EB LT C D (25.6 secs) EB RT B B EB APPROACH C C NB LT A B TABLE 4 Short Range (2019) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM Shields/Truxtun (stop sign) EB LT D (26.3 secs) D (27.7 secs) EB RT B B EB APPROACH C C NB LT A B Shields/Bon Homme Richard (stop sign) EB LT D (30.1 secs) D (30.0 secs) EB RT B B EB APPROACH C C NB LT A B DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 16 DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 17 Geometry The short range (2019) geometry is shown in Figure 9. The geometry at the analyzed intersections is the existing geometry. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix F shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site. The Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site is located within an area termed as “other,” which sets the level of service threshold at LOS C for all measured factors. There is one destination area within 1320 feet of the proposed Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4: 1) Registry Ridge to the west of the site. Sidewalks exist along all developed properties within Registry Ridge. There are also various trails through the open space areas within Registry Ridge. Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 will continue the trail system in the open space areas, similar to what exists within the currently developed areas of Registry Ridge. Appendix F contains a Pedestrian LOS Worksheet. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are no destination areas within 1320 feet of the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4, as shown in Appendix F. There are bicycle lanes on Shields Street, Trilby Road, Truxtun Drive, and Bon Homme Richard Drive. The bicycle level of service is acceptable. The bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix F. Transit Level of Service Currently, Transfort does not serve this area of Fort Collins. IV. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 development on the short range (2019) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: • The development of the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site will generate approximately 924 daily weekday trip ends, 77 morning peak hour trip ends, and 94 afternoon peak hour trip ends. • Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable with existing control and geometry. • In the short range (2019) future, given development of the Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 site and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections operate acceptably with existing control and geometry in the morning and afternoon peak hours. • No additional auxiliary lanes are recommended at the key intersections. • Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi-modal transportation guidelines. DELICH Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 ASSOCIATES Page 19 APPENDIX A B. N. R.R. 287 Registry Ridge 4th Filing Trilby Shields Taft Hill Harmony Registry Ridge 2nd Filing SCALE: 1"=2000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge 2nd & 4th Filing TIS, August 2014 SCALE: 1"=200' SITE PLANS FOR FILING 2 & 4 Figure 2 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 DELICH Registry Ridge 5th Filing TIS, June 2012 ASSOCIATES TABLE 2 Trip Generation Code Use Size AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out 2nd Filing 210 Single Family 34 D.U. EQ 389 EQ 9 EQ 25 EQ 25 EQ 15 4th Filing 210 Single Family 48 D.U. EQ 535 EQ 11 EQ 32 EQ 34 EQ 20 Total 924 20 57 59 35 Trilby Shields 31% 69% Truxtun Bon Richards Homme Filing 4 Filing 2 SCALE: 1"=500' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 1 DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge 2nd & 4th Filing TIS, August 2014 Based on current turning movement counts at Truxtun & Bon Homme Richards APPENDIX B DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 8/26/2014 Observer: Sue Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: Shields/Truxtun S = straight L = left turn Time Northbound: Shields Southbound: Shields Total Eastbound: Truxtun Westbound: Total Total Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All 7:30 2 241 243 122 8 130 373 4 2 6 0 6 379 7:45 0 229 229 127 6 133 362 10 2 12 0 12 374 8:00 2 225 227 112 6 118 345 4 1 5 0 5 350 8:15 0 191 191 112 3 115 306 13 2 15 0 15 321 7:30-8:30 4 886 0 890 0 473 23 496 1386 31 0 7 38 0 0 0 0 38 1424 PHF 0.5 0.92 n/a 0.92 n/a 0.93 0.72 0.93 0.6 n/a 0.88 0.63 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.94 4:30 1 164 165 176 7 183 348 6 3 9 0 9 357 4:45 2 137 139 216 18 234 373 6 1 7 0 7 380 5:00 2 161 163 205 13 218 381 12 2 14 0 14 395 5:15 3 147 150 202 15 217 367 8 1 9 0 9 376 4:30-5:30 8 609 0 617 0 799 53 852 1469 32 0 7 39 0 0 0 0 39 1508 PHF 0.67 0.93 n/a 0.93 n/a 0.92 0.74 0.91 0.67 n/a 0.58 0.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.95 DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 8/28/2014 Observer: Sue Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: Shields/Bon Homme Richards S = straight L = left turn Time Northbound: Shields Southbound: Shields Total Eastbound: Bon Homme Westbound: Total Total Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All 7:30 5 233 238 98 2 100 338 9 11 20 0 20 358 7:45 3 244 247 132 7 139 386 1 10 11 0 11 397 8:00 7 192 199 82 2 84 283 7 5 12 0 12 295 8:15 1 175 176 112 4 116 292 20 1 21 0 21 313 7:30-8:30 16 844 0 860 0 424 15 439 1299 37 0 27 64 0 0 0 0 64 1363 PHF 0.57 0.86 n/a 0.87 n/a 0.8 0.54 0.79 0.46 n/a 0.61 0.76 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.86 4:30 9 146 155 176 15 191 346 6 5 11 0 11 357 4:45 8 140 148 192 12 204 352 8 6 14 0 14 366 5:00 7 141 148 242 8 250 398 10 6 16 0 16 414 5:15 7 181 188 215 10 225 413 9 3 12 0 12 425 4:30-5:30 31 608 0 639 0 825 45 870 1509 33 0 20 53 0 0 0 0 53 1562 PHF 0.86 0.84 n/a 0.85 n/a 0.85 0.75 0.87 0.83 n/a 0.83 0.83 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.92 APPENDIX C HCM 2010 TWSC Recent AM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent am.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 31 7 4 882 453 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 90 - - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 8 4 980 503 26 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1492 252 503 0 - 0 Stage 1 503 - - - - - Stage 2 989 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 125 748 1058 - - - Stage 1 573 - - - - - Stage 2 359 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 125 748 1058 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 254 - - - - - Stage 1 573 - - - - - Stage 2 358 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 19.3 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1058 - 254 748 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.136 0.01 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - 21.4 9.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.5 0 - - Lanes and Geometrics Recent AM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent am.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 100 90 500 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 265 1060 447 Travel Time (s) 6.0 16.1 6.8 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Recent PM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent pm.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 32 7 8 621 831 53 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 90 - - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 34 8 9 668 894 57 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1579 447 894 0 - 0 Stage 1 894 - - - - - Stage 2 685 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 110 560 755 - - - Stage 1 361 - - - - - Stage 2 499 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 109 560 755 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 238 - - - - - Stage 1 361 - - - - - Stage 2 493 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.7 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 755 - 238 560 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.145 0.013 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - 22.7 11.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.5 0 - - Lanes and Geometrics Recent PM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent pm.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 100 90 500 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 265 1060 447 Travel Time (s) 6.0 16.1 6.8 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Recent AM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent am.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 37 27 16 849 445 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 190 0 160 - - 425 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 41 30 18 943 494 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1473 247 494 0 - 0 Stage 1 494 - - - - - Stage 2 979 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 128 754 1066 - - - Stage 1 580 - - - - - Stage 2 363 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 126 754 1066 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 255 - - - - - Stage 1 580 - - - - - Stage 2 357 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.8 0.2 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1066 - 255 754 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.161 0.04 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - 21.8 10 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.6 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Recent AM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent am.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 190 0 160 425 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 267 248 1060 Travel Time (s) 6.1 3.8 16.1 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Recent PM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent pm.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 33 20 31 596 793 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 190 0 160 - - 425 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 35 22 33 641 853 48 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1561 426 853 0 - 0 Stage 1 853 - - - - - Stage 2 708 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 113 578 782 - - - Stage 1 379 - - - - - Stage 2 487 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 108 578 782 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 239 - - - - - Stage 1 379 - - - - - Stage 2 466 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.5 0.5 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 782 - 239 578 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 - 0.148 0.037 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - 22.7 11.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.5 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Recent PM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates recent pm.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 190 0 160 425 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 267 248 1060 Travel Time (s) 6.1 3.8 16.1 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A < 10 B > 10 and < 15 C > 15 and < 25 D > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and < 50 F > 50 APPENDIX D HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd AM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb am.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 35 14 6 974 500 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 90 - - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 39 16 7 1082 556 28 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1652 278 556 0 - 0 Stage 1 556 - - - - - Stage 2 1096 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 98 720 1011 - - - Stage 1 539 - - - - - Stage 2 319 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 97 720 1011 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 223 - - - - - Stage 1 539 - - - - - Stage 2 317 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.4 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1011 - 223 720 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.174 0.022 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 - 24.5 10.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.6 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Bkgrd AM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb am.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 100 90 500 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 265 1060 447 Travel Time (s) 6.0 16.1 6.8 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd PM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb pm.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 34 11 14 686 917 61 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 90 - - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 37 12 15 738 986 66 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1754 493 986 0 - 0 Stage 1 986 - - - - - Stage 2 768 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 85 523 696 - - - Stage 1 323 - - - - - Stage 2 457 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 83 523 696 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 208 - - - - - Stage 1 323 - - - - - Stage 2 447 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.6 0.2 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 696 - 208 523 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - 0.176 0.023 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - 26 12 - - HCM Lane LOS B - D B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.6 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Bkgrd PM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb pm.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 100 90 500 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 265 1060 447 Travel Time (s) 6.0 16.1 6.8 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd AM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb am.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 37 27 16 943 499 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 190 0 160 - - 425 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 41 30 18 1048 554 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1637 277 554 0 - 0 Stage 1 554 - - - - - Stage 2 1083 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 101 721 1012 - - - Stage 1 540 - - - - - Stage 2 324 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 99 721 1012 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 224 - - - - - Stage 1 540 - - - - - Stage 2 318 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.5 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1012 - 224 721 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.184 0.042 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 - 24.6 10.2 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.7 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Bkgrd AM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb am.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 190 0 160 425 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 267 248 1060 Travel Time (s) 6.1 3.8 16.1 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Short Bkgrd PM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb pm.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 33 20 31 667 883 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 190 0 160 - - 425 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 35 22 33 717 949 48 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1733 475 949 0 - 0 Stage 1 949 - - - - - Stage 2 784 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 87 537 719 - - - Stage 1 338 - - - - - Stage 2 449 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 83 537 719 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 210 - - - - - Stage 1 338 - - - - - Stage 2 428 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20.5 0.5 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 719 - 210 537 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 - 0.169 0.04 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 - 25.6 12 - - HCM Lane LOS B - D B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.6 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Bkgrd PM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates sb pm.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 190 0 160 425 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 267 248 1060 Travel Time (s) 6.1 3.8 16.1 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other APPENDIX E HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 41 15 6 1007 512 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 90 - - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 46 17 7 1119 569 30 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1701 284 569 0 - 0 Stage 1 569 - - - - - Stage 2 1132 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 92 714 999 - - - Stage 1 531 - - - - - Stage 2 307 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 91 714 999 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 214 - - - - - Stage 1 531 - - - - - Stage 2 305 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22 0.1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 999 - 214 714 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.213 0.023 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 - 26.3 10.2 - - HCM Lane LOS A - D B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.8 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Total AM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 100 90 500 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 265 1060 447 Travel Time (s) 6.0 16.1 6.8 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 37 11 15 707 951 67 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 100 90 - - 500 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 40 12 16 760 1023 72 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1815 511 1023 0 - 0 Stage 1 1023 - - - - - Stage 2 792 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 77 509 674 - - - Stage 1 309 - - - - - Stage 2 445 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 75 509 674 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 198 - - - - - Stage 1 309 - - - - - Stage 2 434 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 24.1 0.2 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 674 - 198 509 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - 0.201 0.023 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.5 - 27.7 12.2 - - HCM Lane LOS B - D B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.7 0.1 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Total PM 3: Shields & Truxtun Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 100 90 500 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 265 1060 447 Travel Time (s) 6.0 16.1 6.8 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total AM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 70 44 22 943 500 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 190 0 160 - - 425 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 78 49 24 1048 556 30 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1653 278 556 0 - 0 Stage 1 556 - - - - - Stage 2 1097 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 98 720 1011 - - - Stage 1 539 - - - - - Stage 2 319 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 96 720 1011 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 220 - - - - - Stage 1 539 - - - - - Stage 2 311 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.5 0.2 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1011 - 220 720 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - 0.354 0.068 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.6 - 30.1 10.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - D B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 1.5 0.2 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Total AM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st am.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 190 0 160 425 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 267 248 1060 Travel Time (s) 6.1 3.8 16.1 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other HCM 2010 TWSC Short Total PM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 54 31 49 668 883 79 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 190 0 160 - - 425 Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 33 53 718 949 85 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1773 475 949 0 - 0 Stage 1 949 - - - - - Stage 2 824 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.93 4.14 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 3.319 2.22 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 82 537 719 - - - Stage 1 338 - - - - - Stage 2 430 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 76 537 719 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 201 - - - - - Stage 1 338 - - - - - Stage 2 398 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 23.5 0.7 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 719 - 201 537 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 - 0.289 0.062 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 - 30 12.1 - - HCM Lane LOS B - D B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1.1 0.2 - - Lanes and Geometrics Short Total PM 5: Shields & Bon Homme Richards Registry Ridge Filing 2 & 4 9/3/2014 Synchro 8 Light Report Delich Associates st pm.syn Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 190 0 160 425 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 1863 3539 1583 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 267 248 1060 Travel Time (s) 6.1 3.8 16.1 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other APPENDIX F Trilby Shields Truxtun Bon Richards Homme Filing 4 Filing 2 SCALE: 1"=500' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA DELICH ASSOCIATES Registry Ridge Filings 2 & 4 TIS, September 2014 Pedestrian LOS Worksheet Project Location Classification: Other Description of Applicable Destination Area Within 1320’ Destination Area Classification Level of Service (minimum based on project location classification) Directness Continuity Street Crossings Visual Interest & Amenities Security Registry Ridge Residential Minimum C C C C C 1 Actual A B B B B Proposed A B B B B Minimum 2 Actual Proposed Minimum 3 Actual Proposed Minimum 4 Actual Proposed Minimum 5 Actual Proposed Minimum 6 Actual Proposed Minimum 7 Actual Proposed Minimum 8 Actual Proposed Minimum 9 Actual Proposed Minimum 10 Actual Proposed