The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIGDEN FARM FILING SIX, TRACT Z, MULTI-FAMILY - FDP - FDP150004 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - REVISIONSAddressed comments Rigden Farm Filing Six Tract Z Multi-family, PDP140009, Round Number 3 Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: Repeat comment: Site, Utility and Landscape Plans: Coordinate the locations of utilities, lights (including lights along the private drive), sidewalk chases etc. between the various plans. Conflicts still exist with proposed trees. Where conflicts exist, accomodate trees in the same general location by adjusting the utilities lines, transformers, bike racks, etc. as needed on the utility and site plans. Virtually none of the utilities are visible on the scaled landscape plan, so we are unable to evaluate the extent of conflicts. The plans have been revised. Comment Number: 43 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: Bike rack areas need more paving to accommodate maneuvering and storage of bikes. see redlines. The paving has been added. Comment Number: 44 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: Landscape Plan: The median strips between the garages must be landscaped. We need typical details for all three of the parking strips for each width demonstrating how the strips will be landscaped. A typical parking lot island/strip planting has been provided on detail E sheet L2. Comment Number: 45 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: Landscape: Low hydrozone areas on the plans need to be delineated with solid lines that will reproduce. The line work has been adjusted to reproduce more clearly. Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: Landscape Plan: Switch to 1:20 for the final plans so that the utilities, etc. can be shown clearly without the need for toned linework. The toned linework does not print or scan. The comment is noted. The toned line work has been adjusted so the utilities read more clearly with this resubmittal. Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: Landscape: Consider pulling back the trees in the main open space area so that the open space is more open. The landscape has been revised per meeting with you and Ripley Design. Comment Number: 48 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: Building elevations: Still need side and rear elevations for the 3 buildings. The elevations have been provided. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-221-6501, tsiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/23/2014 07/23/2014: Please contact me on the process to vacate the existing Access easement in the middle of the property. A legal description and exhibit will be needed and an additional TDRF fee is required to vacate an easement by separate document. You can visit http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php for additional information as well. The easement vacation application has been completed and submitted. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/23/2014 07/23/2014: The regional trail path/ sidewalk needs to be located in an Access easement. Once the final location of the path is determined please submit access easement dedication documents (legal description, exhibit, and additional TDRF fee to dedicate easements by separate document. You can visit http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php for additional information as well. The easement dedication application has been completed and submitted. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/23/2014 07/23/2014: Please add General Notes- Appendix E-1-FC/Lar and Appendix E-2 B. Street Improvement Notes, C. Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes, and E. Waterline Note of LCUASS to the utility plan set. Contact me if you need a word doc. copy of these general project notes. The general notes have been added to the plans. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/23/2014 10/23/2014: See redlines for other minor comments related to the second round of project review. 07/23/2014: See redlines for other minor comments. The redlines have been addressed. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 10/24/2014 10/24/2014: Additional elevation points are needed at the private drive entrance off of Denver Dr (see Grading Plan redlines). It appears that this area is draining out towards the street, through the drive approach. If so, please revise. No more than 750 sq. ft. of pavement can drain through the drive approach and across public sidewalk. A sidewalk chase may be needed to convey the water under the sidewalk to get to the curb and gutter. The grading has been revised so that half of the driveway drains to the chase east of Building #1 and the other half drains over the sidewalk. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/15/2014 12/15/2014: Please revise the Details Sheets (sheet 10, 11, 12). Formatting error. The details have been updated. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/17/2014 07/17/2014: 1. All multi-family buildings (R-2 occupancy) must be fire-sprinkled per 2012 IBC. 2. Effective 8/1/14 13-R type fire-sprinkler systems will not be allowed and a full NFPA 13 system must be installed. See attached approved variance. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 12/02/2014: The original Rigden Farm Filing 6th Erosion Control Report does not meet current erosion control design criteria. Since this is a new project, it is required to follow current design criteria. Escrow Calculation was not recieved in the Stormwater Packet. That too will have to be submitted. At this time the comments from the prior round are still valid and need to be met before the project is approved at FDP. The report has been provide with the submittal. 10/15/2014: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft and in a sensitive area, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com The report has been provide with the submittal. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/21/2014 10/21/2014: Stormwater is ready for a hearing. The comment is noted. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: There is no sheet number on the 1 sheet that was provided for review. All sheets need sheet numbering that matches the cover sheet. A title block with sheet numbers has been added. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/21/2014 12/09/2014: The format shown on the plans does not match the required format shown in the previous comment below. The format must match what is shown below. 10/20/2014: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum. Please provide the following information in the format shown below. If your project is started on NAVD88 datum: 1) PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK #1 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK #2 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: OR, if project has already been surveyed in NAVD29 Unadjusted datum: 2) PROJECT DATUM: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (OLD CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) BENCHMARK #1 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK #2 w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: If using NGVD29 UNADJUSTED the following equation statement will be needed. NOTE: IF NAVD 88 DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NAVD88 = NGVD29 UNADJUSTED + X.XX¿ 07/21/2014: The following MUST be met for benchmarks. 1. A minimum of 2 benchmarks must be listed. 2. The NGVD29(Unadjusted) & NAVD88 elevations must be shown. 3. The project datum must be noted. 4. An equation from NGVD29(Unadjusted) to NAVD88 must be shown. The Project Control notes have been revised. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/21/2014 12/09/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 10/20/2014: There is a new line over text issue on sheet 6. See redlines. 07/21/2014: There is a line over text issue on sheet 6. See redlines. The plans have been revised. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/20/2014 12/09/2014: This has not been completely corrected. 10/20/2014: The index on sheet 1 should match each sheet title & numbering. See redlines. The plans have been revised. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/09/2014 12/09/2014: There are detail sheets that are missing information. See redlines. The plans have been revised. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/21/2014 12/09/2014: There is no sheet numbers on the sheets that were provided for review. All sheets need sheet numbering that matches the cover sheet. 10/20/2014: No comments. 07/21/2014: No comments. The sheet numbers are on the plan. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/21/2014 12/09/2014: There are new line over text issues. See redlines. 10/20/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 07/21/2014: There is a line over text issue on sheet 2. See redlines. The plans have been revised. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/20/2014 12/09/2014: Not all plans were provided for review, so we can not verify this. 10/20/2014: The index on sheet 1 should match each sheet title & numbering. See redlines. The plans have been revised. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/21/2014 10/21/2014: Show water and sewer services and fire lines on the landscape plan and adjust tree locations to provide the required separation distances. The plans have been revised.