HomeMy WebLinkAboutZIEGLER-HARVEST PARK - FDP - FDP140022 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY (3)TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 2
Land Use......................................................................................................................... 2
Roads.............................................................................................................................. 2
Existing Traffic................................................................................................................. 4
Existing Operation........................................................................................................... 4
Pedestrians Facilities ...................................................................................................... 4
Bicycle Facilities..............................................................................................................4
Transit Facilities ..............................................................................................................4
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT................................................................................. 7
Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 7
Trip Distribution ...............................................................................................................7
Background Traffic Projections ..................................................................................... 10
Trip Assignment ............................................................................................................ 10
Signal Warrants............................................................................................................. 10
Operation Analysis ........................................................................................................ 10
Geometry ...................................................................................................................... 19
Pedestrian Level of Service........................................................................................... 19
Bicycle Level of Service ................................................................................................ 19
Transit Level of Service................................................................................................. 24
IV. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. 25
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES
LIST OF TABLES
1. Current Peak Hour Operation.................................................................................... 6
2. Trip Generation ......................................................................................................... 7
3. Short Range (2015) Background Peak Hour Operation .......................................... 17
4. Short Range (2017) Background Peak Hour Operation .......................................... 18
5. Phase 1 Short Range (2015) Total Peak Hour Operation ....................................... 20
6. Full Development Short Range (2017) Total Peak Hour Operation ........................ 21
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Site Location ............................................................................................................. 3
2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic .......................................................................................... 5
3. Site Plan.................................................................................................................... 8
4. Trip Distribution ......................................................................................................... 9
5. Short Range (2015) Background Peak Hour Traffic................................................ 11
6. Short Range (2017) Background Peak Hour Traffic................................................ 12
7. Phase 1 Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ............................................................. 13
8. Full Development Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic............................................... 14
9. Phase 1 Short Range (2015) Total Peak Hour Traffic............................................. 15
10. Full Development Short Range (2017) Total Peak Hour Traffic .............................. 16
11. Phae 1 Short Range (2015) Geometry.................................................................... 22
12. Full Development Short Range (2017) Geometry ................................................... 23
APPENDICES
A. Base Assumptions Form/Recent Peak Hour Traffic
B. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins LOS
Standards
C. Short Range (2015) Background Peak Hour Operation
D. Short Range (2017) Background Peak Hour Operation
E. Phase 1 Short Range (2015) Total Peak Hour Operation
F. Full Development Short Range (2017) Total Peak Hour Operation
G. Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES
I. INTRODUCTION
This intermediate transportation impact study (ITIS) addresses the capacity,
geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Harvest Park/Ziegler
Mixed-Use development. The proposed Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site is located
west of Ziegler Road and north of Kechter Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado.
During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project
architect (Architecture West) and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. This study
generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study
guidelines contained in the “Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards” (LCUASS). A
Base Assumptions Form and related information are provided in Appendix A. The study
involved the following steps:
• Collect physical, traffic, and development data;
• Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment;
• Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
• Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections;
• Analyze signal warrants;
• Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of
transportation.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The location of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site is shown in Figure 1. It is
important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented.
Land Use
Land uses in the immediate area are primarily school or residential. There are
industrial and commercial land uses to the northeast of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-
Use site (>0.25 miles). Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic
operations perspective. The center of Fort Collins lies to the northwest of the proposed
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site.
Roads
The primary streets near the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site are Ziegler
Road, Rock Creek Drive, and Saber Cat Drive-County Fair Lane (extended).
Ziegler Road is classified as a four-lane arterial street, north of Rock Creek Drive
and a two-lane arterial street, south of Rock Creek Drive on the Fort Collins Master
Street Plan. Currently, Ziegler Road has a four-lane cross section with auxiliary lanes
north of Rock Creek Drive and has a two-lane cross section with auxiliary lanes south of
Rock Creek Drive. At the Ziegler/Rock Creek intersection, Ziegler Road has
northbound and southbound left-turn lanes, one through lane in each direction, and
northbound and southbound right-turn lanes. There are two northbound through lanes
on Ziegler Road, north of the Ziegler/Rock Creek intersection. The Ziegler/Rock Creek
intersection has signal control. At the Ziegler/Saber Cat intersection, Ziegler Road has
a southbound left-turn lane, one southbound through lane, and a combined northbound
through/right-turn lane. The existing speed limit in this area is 40 mph.
Rock Creek Drive is an east-west street designated as a collector street on the
Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Rock Creek Drive has a two-lane cross
section east of Ziegler Road. At the Ziegler/Rock Creek intersection, Rock Creek Drive
has a westbound left-turn lane, one westbound through-lane, a combined eastbound
left-turn/through lane, and eastbound and westbound right-turn lanes.
Saber Cat Drive and County Fair Lane (extended) are classified as a local
streets. At the Ziegler/Saber Cat intersection, Saber Cat Drive has a westbound left-
turn lane and a westbound right-turn lane. The Ziegler/Saber Cat intersection has stop
sign control on Saber Cat Drive. County Fair Lane is built west of the Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site. The development of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use
site will connect County Fair Lane with Ziegler Road.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 2
Harmony
Rock Creek
Ziegler
Lady Moon
Kechter
Timberline
Interstate 25
Harvest Park/
Ziegler
Mixed-Use
Saber
Cat
Fossil
Creek
HS
Preston
MS
Bacon
ES
Zach
ES
SCALE: 1"=2000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 3
Existing Traffic
Recent peak hour traffic counts at the Ziegler/Rock Creek and Ziegler/Saber Cat
intersections are shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix A. The
traffic data at the key intersections was collected in December 2011. The traffic counts
were performed when Fossil Ridge High School was in session.
Existing Operation
The key intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000
Highway Capacity Manual. Using the recent peak hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the
current peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in
Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized
intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort
Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are provided in Appendix B. The
key intersections operate acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours.
This site is in an area termed “Low Density Mixed-Use Residential.” In “Low Density
Mixed-Use Residential” areas, acceptable operation at unsignalized arterial/collector or
local intersections is level of service F and at collector/local intersections is level of
service C. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours in
“Low Density Mixed-Use Residential” areas is defined as level of service D or better,
overall. Any leg or movement can operate at level of service D.
Pedestrian Facilities
There are pedestrian facilities adjacent to developed properties along Ziegler
Road, Rock Creek Drive, and Saber Cat Drive. There are no sidewalks adjacent to the
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site. As roads are built to arterial/collector standards,
sidewalks will be included in the street cross sections. Sidewalks will be incorporated
within and adjacent to this development.
Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle lanes exist on Ziegler Road and Rock Creek Drive. Bike lanes are not
required on local or connector streets.
Transit Facilities
Currently, Transfort serves this area of Fort Collins with Routes 16 and 17.
Routes 16 and 17 run along Harmony Road, Ziegler Road, and Rock Creek Drive.
Route 16 runs adjacent to the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 4
AM/PM
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 5
102/35
516/294
7/3
14/74
256/476
30/94
66/13
26/17
55/36
107/83
28/10
7/13
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
Ziegler
274/495
44/30
563/294
31/7
62/38
23/18
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT/T D D
EB RT D D
EB APPROACH D D
WB LT D D
WB T D D
WB RT D D
WB APPROACH D D
NB LT A A
NB T A A
NB RT A A
NB APPROACH A A
SB LT A A
SB T A A
SB RT A A
SB APPROACH A A
Ziegler/Rock Creek
(signal)
OVERALL B B
WB LT C C
WB RT B B
WB APPROACH C B
Ziegler/Saber Cat
(stop sign)
SB LT A A
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 6
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use is proposed as four townhome buildings with 22
total dwelling units (south portion) and 15,000 square feet of medical/dental office in two
buildings (north portion). Figure 3 shows a site plan of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-
Use site. The site plan shows an access to/from County Fair Lane. County Fair Lane will
be extended to Ziegler Road with this development. The development will be built in
two phases. The short range analysis (Year 2015) includes development of the south
portion of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site and the short range analysis (Year
2017) includes full development of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site.
Trip Generation
Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this
upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information
contained in Trip Generation, 9th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be
generated by the proposed/expected use at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip
generation on a daily and peak hour basis.
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
Code Use Size AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out
Phase 1
230 Townhome 22 DU EQ 172 EQ 3 EQ 12 EQ 11 EQ 6
Phase 2
720 Medical/Dental Office 15.0 KSF EQ 398 1.82 28 0.48 8 EQ 15 EQ 38
Total 570 31 20 26 44
Trip Distribution
Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site. Future year data was obtained from the NFRRTP and other
traffic studies. Figure 4 shows the trip distribution used for the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-
Use site.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 7
SCALE: 1"=100'
SITE PLAN Figure 3
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 8
Ziegler Road
24'
9'
WATER LINE
6 PLEX RESIDENCE
21
2 STORY
BUILDING A
6005 S,F,
FF = 10.60
138.25'
5 SPACES
FOSSIL RIDGE
HIGH SCHOOL
LMN
CITY OF FORT COLLINS OPEN
SPACE
LMN
BUFFER ZONE
96'
58.5'
96'
14.5'
34' 68' 30.37'
16.5'
LTD.
SIGHT
SIGN
NEW 6' WALK
NEW 4.5' WALK
TURF
TURF TURF
TURF
TURF
WALK
WALK
WALK
WALK
CONC. PVMT.
5'
301.83' 50.92' 216'-7.60"
68'
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
LIMIT OF WETLANDS
LOT 2
LMN LMN
LMN
EX. STORM WATER
LMN
FUTURE WALK
FUTURE WALK
10 SPACES 10 SPACES
8 SPACES
Ziegler
Saber Cat
County Fair
60%
25% 50%
30%
NOM
5%
15%
15%
SCALE: 1"=200'
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 9
Med./Den. Office
Residential
Legend:
Background Traffic Projections
Figures 5 and 6 show the Phase 1 short range (2015) and Full Development
short range (2017) background traffic projections, respectively. Background traffic
projections for the short range future horizons were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP,
reviewing traffic studies for other developments, and reviewing historic count data for
this area of Fort Collins. Other developments include: various parcels within the
Harmony Tech Park. It is important to note that both the short range (2015) and short
range (2017) background traffic projections assume that County Fair Lane has already
been extended to Ziegler Road.
Trip Assignment
Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be
loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution
process. The site generated trip assignment for Phase 1 and Full Development of the
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site is shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. The site
generated traffic was combined with the background traffic to determine the total
forecasted traffic at the key intersections. Figures 9 and 10 show the respective Phase
1 short range (2015) and Full Development short range (2017) total traffic at the key
intersections.
Signal Warrants
As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants
are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). None of
the stop sign controlled intersections are expected to meet peak hour signal warrants.
Operation Analysis
Operation analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operation
analyses were conducted for the Phase 1 short range analysis, reflecting a year 2015
condition and for the Full Development short range analysis, reflecting a year 2017
condition.
Using the short range (2015) background peak hour traffic volumes, the key
intersections operate as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are
provided in Appendix C. The key intersections operate acceptably during the peak
hours.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6, the key intersections operate in the
short range (2017) background condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for
these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections operate acceptably
during the peak hours.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 10
AM/PM
SHORT RANGE (2015) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 11
51/17
588/335
34/8
4/23
281/570
48/32
21/4
10/6
28/17
67/41
11/4
25/19
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
Ziegler
60/21
591/348
25/11
11/57
286/569
93/148
51/10
27/14
32/22
156/152
21/15
15/34
County Fair
AM/PM
SHORT RANGE (2017) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 12
53/18
610/345
35/8
5/24
292/591
50/34
21/5
10/7
28/18
70/43
11/5
26/20
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
Ziegler
62/21
614/361
25/11
11/60
298/591
95/152
53/10
28/14
34/23
160/155
22/16
15/35
County Fair
AM/PM
PHASE 1 SITE GENERATED
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 13
1/3
2/6
6/3
0/0
4/2
0/0
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
6/3 Ziegler
2/6
County Fair
Site Access
3/9
0/2
2/1
10/5
AM/PM
FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE
GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 14
8/7
19/15
11/26
0/0
6/11
0/0
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
11/26 Ziegler
19/15
County Fair
Site Access
2/1
NOM
10/5
1/6
NOM
7/32
4/2
0/2
24/13
3/9
AM/PM
PHASE 1 SHORT RANGE (2015)
TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 15
52/20
588/335
34/8
6/29
281/570
48/32
27/7
10/6
32/19
67/41
11/4
25/19
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
Ziegler
60/21
597/351
25/11
11/57
288/575
93/148
51/10
27/14
32/22
156/152
21/15
15/34
County Fair
Site Access
66/44
3/9
59/27
0/2
2/1
10/5
AM/PM
FULL DEVELOPMENT SHORT RANGE (2017)
TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 10
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 16
61/25
610/345
35/8
24/39
292/591
50/34
32/31
10/7
34/29
70/43
11/5
26/20
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
Ziegler
62/21
625/387
25/11
11/60
317/606
95/152
53/10
28/14
34/23
160/155
22/16
15/35
County Fair
2/1
NOM
10/5
1/6
NOM
7/32
4/2
59/30
0/2
24/13
69/47
3/9
Site Access
TABLE 3
Short Range (2015) Background Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT/T D D
EB RT D D
EB APPROACH D D
WB LT D D
WB T D D
WB RT D D
WB APPROACH D D
NB LT A A
NB T A A
NB RT A A
NB APPROACH A A
SB LT A A
SB T A A
SB RT A A
SB APPROACH A A
Ziegler/Rock Creek
(signal)
OVERALL B B
EB LT/T/RT D C
WB LT D D
WB T/RT C B
WB APPROACH C C
NB LT A A
Ziegler/Saber Cat-County Fair
(stop sign)
SB LT A A
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 17
TABLE 4
Short Range (2017) Background Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT/T D D
EB RT D D
EB APPROACH D D
WB LT D D
WB T D D
WB RT D D
WB APPROACH D D
NB LT A A
NB T A A
NB RT A A
NB APPROACH A A
SB LT A A
SB T A A
SB RT A A
SB APPROACH A A
Ziegler/Rock Creek
(signal)
OVERALL B B
EB LT/T/RT D C
WB LT D D
WB T/RT C B
WB APPROACH C C
NB LT A A
Ziegler/Saber Cat-County Fair
(stop sign)
SB LT A A
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 18
Table 5 shows the Phase 1 short range (2015) peak hour operation at the key
intersections with full development of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site.
Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections
operate acceptably during the peak hours.
Table 6 shows the Full Development short range (2017) peak hour operation at
the key intersections with full development of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site.
Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections
operate acceptably during the peak hours.
Geometry
The Phase 1 short range (2015) geometry is shown in Figure 11 and the Full
Development short range (2017) geometry is shown in Figure 12. The geometry at the
Ziegler/Rock Creek intersection is the same as the existing geometry.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet and one mile
(school walking area) of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site. The Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site is located within an area termed as “other,” which sets the
level of service threshold at LOS C for all measured factors. However, since there are
residential land uses within the proposed Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site, “School
Walking Area” was used for Fossil Creek High School and Preston Middle/Traut Core
School(s), which sets the level of service threshold at LOS B for all measured factors,
except for “Visual Interest & Amenity,” which is LOS C. Residents of the proposed
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site will go to Bacon Elementary School, which is more
than a mile from the site. There are five destination areas within 1320 feet/one mile of
the proposed Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site: 1) Fossil Ridge High School; 2) the
residential neighborhood to the north and northwest of the site; 3) the residential
neighborhood to the south and southwest of the site; 4) the residential neighborhood to
the south of the site; and 5) Preston Middle/Traut Core Knowledge School. In most
cases, sidewalks exist within the pedestrian influence area, except along undeveloped
properties. It is assumed that sidewalks will be completed as properties develop.
Sidewalks will be incorporated within and adjacent to this development. Appendix G
contains a Pedestrian LOS Worksheet. The pedestrian level of service will be
acceptable for all measured categories.
Bicycle Level of Service
Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, 1) Fossil
Ridge High School is the only destination area within 1320 feet of the Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site. The bicycle level of service is acceptable. Appendix G
contains a Bicycle LOS Worksheet.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 19
TABLE 5
Phase 1 Short Range (2015) Total Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT/T D D
EB RT D D
EB APPROACH D D
WB LT D D
WB T D D
WB RT D D
WB APPROACH D D
NB LT A A
NB T A A
NB RT A A
NB APPROACH A A
SB LT A A
SB T A A
SB RT A A
SB APPROACH A A
Ziegler/Rock Creek
(signal)
OVERALL B B
EB LT/T/RT D C
WB LT D D
WB T/RT C B
WB APPROACH C C
NB LT A A
Ziegler/Saber Cat-County Fair
(stop sign)
SB LT A A
County Fair/Site Access NB LT/RT A A
(stop sign) WB LT/T A A
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 20
TABLE 6
Full Development Short Range (2017) Total Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT/T D D
EB RT D D
EB APPROACH D D
WB LT D D
WB T D D
WB RT D D
WB APPROACH D D
NB LT A A
NB T A A
NB RT A A
NB APPROACH A A
SB LT A A
SB T A A
SB RT A A
SB APPROACH A A
Ziegler/Rock Creek
(signal)
OVERALL B B
EB LT/T/RT E D
WB LT D D
WB T/RT C B
WB APPROACH C C
NB LT A A
Ziegler/Saber Cat-County Fair
(stop sign)
SB LT A A
NB LT/T/RT A A
SB LT/T/RT A A
EB LT/T/RT A A
County Fair/Site Access
(stop sign)
WB LT/T/RT A A
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 21
PHASE 1 SHORT
RANGE (2015) GEOMETRY Figure 11
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 22
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
Ziegler
County Fair
Site Access
- Denotes Lane
FULL DEVELOPMENT SHORT
RANGE (2017) GEOMETRY Figure 12
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Page 23
Saber Cat
Rock Creek
Ziegler
County Fair
Site Access
- Denotes Lane
Transit Level of Service
Currently, Transfort serves this area of Fort Collins with Routes 16 and 17.
Routes 16 and 17 run along Harmony Road, Ziegler Road, and Rock Creek Drive.
Route 16 runs adjacent to the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site. These routes are
considered to be within walking distance of the proposed Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-
Use site.
School Traffic
Just prior to the morning peak hour (7:30-8:30am), vehicular traffic at the
Ziegler/Saber Cat intersection was observed. This time period was prior to the
beginning of classes at Fossil Creek High School. Traffic entering Saber Cat Drive,
from both the north and south, was significant. There is a southbound left-turn lane on
Ziegler Road, that removed the left-turns from the through lane. The northbound right-
turns were significant during the observation period (approximately 20 minutes). There
is no northbound right-turn lane. As such, the right-turning traffic caused delays to the
northbound through traffic. The queue extended to/near Sage Creek Road, which is
approximately 600 feet south of Saber Cat Drive. It is recommended that the City of
Fort Collins evaluate this situation and consider installing a northbound right-turn lane
approaching Saber Cat Drive.
Safe Routes To School
With the connection of County Fair Lane to Ziegler Road, it is expected that the
number of pedestrians crossing Ziegler Road at this location will increase. This is
especially true during school times. While the preferred location for pedestrians to
cross Ziegler Road is at the signalized Ziegler/Rock Creek intersection to the north,
there is little doubt that pedestrians will cross Ziegler Road at the Ziegler/Saber Cat-
County Fair intersection. It is recommended that the City of Fort Collins conduct a
“Crosswalk Location and Feasibility Analysis” as described in the Fort Collins
Pedestrian Plan, February 15, 2011. It is recommended that this segment of Ziegler
Road be designated as a reduced speed limit school zone.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 24
IV. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
This study assessed the impacts of the proposed Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use
site development on the short range (2015) street system in the vicinity of the proposed
development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded:
• The development of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site is feasible from a
traffic engineering standpoint. Phase 1 of the Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use
site will generate approximately 172 daily trip ends, 15 morning peak hour trip
ends, and 17 afternoon peak hour trip ends. At full development, the Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site will generate approximately 570 daily trip ends, 51
morning peak hour trip ends, and 70 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
• Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable.
• In the short range (2015) future, given Phase 1 development of the Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site and an increase in background traffic, the key
intersections operate acceptably during the peak hours, with existing geometry
and intended geometry at the key intersections.
• In the short range (2017) future, given full development of the Harvest
Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use site and an increase in background traffic, the key
intersections operate acceptably during the peak hours, with existing geometry
and intended geometry at the key intersections.
• Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes
based upon the measures in the multi-modal transportation guidelines.
• It is recommended that the City of Fort Collins conduct an evaluation of the need for
a northbound right-turn lane on Ziegler Road approaching Saber Cat Drive and the
need for a crosswalk on Ziegler Road with a school zone designation.
DELICH Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
ASSOCIATES Page 25
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Recent AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1798 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.77 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1429 1583 1059 1863 1583 997 1863 1583 789 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 66 26 55 7 28 107 102 516 7 30 256 14
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 78 31 65 8 33 126 109 549 7 35 301 16
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 56 0 0 109 002005
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 109 9 8 33 17 109 549 5 35 301 11
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 93.5 86.4 86.4 86.9 83.1 83.1
Effective Green, g (s) 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 95.5 88.4 88.4 88.9 85.1 85.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.80 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.71 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 188 208 139 245 208 839 1372 1166 616 1321 1123
v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.01 c0.29 0.00 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm c0.08 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.58 0.04 0.06 0.13 0.08 0.13 0.40 0.00 0.06 0.23 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 49.0 45.5 45.6 46.1 45.7 2.8 5.9 4.2 4.3 6.1 5.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0
Delay (s) 53.3 45.6 45.8 46.3 45.9 2.9 6.8 4.2 4.3 6.5 5.1
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.4 46.0 6.1 6.2
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 16.7 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Recent AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 21 65 34 23 63 34
Maximum Split (%) 17.5% 54.2% 28.3% 19.2% 52.5% 28.3%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 17 38 103 17 40 103
End Time (s) 38 103 17 40 103 17
Yield/Force Off (s) 34 97 11 36 97 11
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 34 86 0 36 86 0
Local Start Time (s) 97 118 63 97 0 63
Local Yield (s) 114 57 91 116 57 91
Local Yield 170(s) 114 46 80 116 46 80
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Recent PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.86 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1607 1583 1368 1863 1583 792 1863 1583 996 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 13 17 36 13 10 83 35 294 3 74 476 94
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 15 20 42 15 12 98 40 338 3 87 560 111
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 39 0 0 90 0010024
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 35 3 15 12 8 40 338 2 87 560 87
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 94.6 90.9 90.9 97.8 92.5 92.5
Effective Green, g (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 96.6 92.9 92.9 99.8 94.5 94.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.80 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.79 0.79
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 131 129 112 152 129 668 1442 1226 863 1467 1247
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 0.18 c0.00 c0.30
v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.06
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.03 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.23 0.00 0.10 0.38 0.07
Uniform Delay, d1 51.7 50.7 51.2 50.9 50.9 2.5 3.7 3.1 1.9 3.9 2.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.1
Delay (s) 52.8 50.8 51.7 51.2 51.1 2.5 4.1 3.1 1.9 4.6 3.0
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 51.7 51.1 3.9 4.1
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 11.2 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.7% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Recent PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 22 64 34 21 65 34
Maximum Split (%) 18.3% 53.3% 28.3% 17.5% 54.2% 28.3%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 18 40 104 18 39 104
End Time (s) 40 104 18 39 104 18
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 98 12 35 98 12
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 87 1 35 87 1
Local Start Time (s) 98 0 64 98 119 64
Local Yield (s) 116 58 92 115 58 92
Local Yield 170(s) 116 47 81 115 47 81
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
6: Saber Cat & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Recent AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 23 62 563 31 44 274
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 27 73 612 34 52 322
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type TWLTL
Median storage veh) 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1055 629 646
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 629
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 426
vCu, unblocked vol 1055 629 646
tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 5.4
tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2
p0 queue free % 90 85 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 274 482 940
Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 27 73 646 52 322
Volume Left 27 0 0 52 0
Volume Right 0 73 34 0 0
cSH 274 482 1700 940 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.15 0.38 0.06 0.19
Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 13 0 4 0
Control Delay (s) 19.5 13.8 0.0 9.1 0.0
Lane LOS C B A
Approach Delay (s) 15.3 0.0 1.3
Approach LOS C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.6% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
6: Saber Cat & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Recent PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 18 38 294 7 30 495
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 21 45 346 8 35 582
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type TWLTL
Median storage veh) 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1003 350 354
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 350
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 653
vCu, unblocked vol 1003 350 354
tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 5.4
tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2
p0 queue free % 93 94 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 284 693 1205
Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 21 45 354 35 582
Volume Left 21 0 0 35 0
Volume Right 0 45 8 0 0
cSH 284 693 1700 1205 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.06 0.21 0.03 0.34
Queue Length 95th (ft) 65020
Control Delay (s) 18.7 10.5 0.0 8.1 0.0
Lane LOS C B A
Approach Delay (s) 13.2 0.0 0.5
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level-of-Service Average Total Delay
sec/veh
A < 10
B > 10 and < 15
C > 15 and < 25
D > 25 and < 35
E > 35 and < 50
F > 50
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level-of-Service Average Total Delay
sec/veh
A < 10
B > 10 and < 20
C > 20 and < 35
D > 35 and < 55
E > 55 and < 80
F > 80
Table 4-3
Fort Collins (City Limits)
Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections)
Land Use (from structure plan)
Other corridors within:
Intersection type Commercial
corridors
Mixed use
districts
Low density
mixed use
residential
All other
areas
Signalized intersections
(overall)
DE*DD
Any Leg EEDE
Any Movement EEDE
Stop sign control
(arterial/collector or local—
any approach leg)
N/A F** F** E
Stop sign control
(collector/local—any
approach leg)
N/A C C C
* mitigating measures required
** considered normal in an urban environment
APPENDIX C
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Bkgrd AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1804 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.79 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1468 1583 1144 1863 1583 1022 1863 1583 654 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 51 27 32 15 21 156 60 591 25 93 286 11
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 60 32 38 18 25 184 64 629 27 109 336 13
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 34 0 0 162 007003
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 4 18 25 22 64 629 20 109 336 10
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 90.1 84.8 84.8 93.5 86.5 86.5
Effective Green, g (s) 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 92.1 86.8 86.8 95.5 88.5 88.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.77 0.72 0.72 0.80 0.74 0.74
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 187 135 220 187 817 1348 1145 586 1374 1167
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 c0.34 c0.01 0.18
v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.14 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.02 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.08 0.47 0.02 0.19 0.24 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 49.8 46.8 47.4 47.3 47.3 3.4 6.9 4.7 3.8 5.0 4.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0
Delay (s) 52.6 46.8 47.8 47.5 47.6 3.4 8.1 4.7 4.0 5.5 4.2
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.9 47.6 7.6 5.1
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 16.4 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.2% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2015) Bkgrd AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 22 67 31 18 71 31
Maximum Split (%) 18.3% 55.8% 25.8% 15.0% 59.2% 25.8%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 18 40 107 18 36 107
End Time (s) 40 107 18 36 107 18
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 101 12 32 101 12
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 90 1 32 90 1
Local Start Time (s) 98 0 67 98 116 67
Local Yield (s) 116 61 92 112 61 92
Local Yield 170(s) 116 50 81 112 50 81
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Bkgrd PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.87 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.48 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1583 1377 1863 1583 700 1863 1583 889 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 10 14 22 34 15 152 21 348 11 148 569 57
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 12 16 26 40 18 179 24 400 13 174 669 67
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 24 0 0 163 0030015
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 28 2 40 18 16 24 400 10 174 669 52
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 91.0 87.4 87.4 99.1 91.5 91.5
Effective Green, g (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 93.0 89.4 89.4 101.1 93.5 93.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.84 0.78 0.78
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 148 144 125 169 144 575 1388 1179 806 1452 1233
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 0.21 c0.01 c0.36
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.17 0.03
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.02 0.32 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.29 0.01 0.22 0.46 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 50.5 49.7 51.1 50.1 50.1 3.3 5.0 3.9 2.0 4.6 3.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.1
Delay (s) 51.1 49.7 52.6 50.4 50.5 3.4 5.5 3.9 2.2 5.6 3.1
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.4 50.8 5.3 4.8
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 13.1 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2015) Bkgrd PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 23 66 31 17 72 31
Maximum Split (%) 19.2% 55.0% 25.8% 14.2% 60.0% 25.8%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 17 40 106 17 34 106
End Time (s) 40 106 17 34 106 17
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 100 11 30 100 11
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 89 0 30 89 0
Local Start Time (s) 97 0 66 97 114 66
Local Yield (s) 116 60 91 110 60 91
Local Yield 170(s) 116 49 80 110 49 80
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Bkgrd AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 21 10 28 25 11 67 51 588 34 48 281 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 25 12 33 29 13 79 55 639 37 56 331 5
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1281 1233 333 1251 1217 658 335 676
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 446 446 768 768
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 835 787 482 448
vCu, unblocked vol 1281 1233 333 1251 1217 658 335 676
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 82 94 95 84 94 83 95 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 134 188 709 180 201 464 1224 915
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 69 29 92 55 676 56 335
Volume Left 25 29 0 55 0 56 0
Volume Right 33 0 79 0 37 0 5
cSH 236 180 392 1224 1700 915 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.29 0.16 0.23 0.05 0.40 0.06 0.20
Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 14 22 4050
Control Delay (s) 26.5 28.9 17.0 8.1 0.0 9.2 0.0
Lane LOS D D C A A
Approach Delay (s) 26.5 19.9 0.6 1.3
Approach LOS D C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.4% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Bkgrd PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 4 6 17 19 4 41 17 335 8 32 570 23
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 7 20 22 5 48 20 394 9 38 671 27
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1244 1203 684 1208 1212 399 698 404
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 759 759 439 439
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 485 444 769 773
vCu, unblocked vol 1244 1203 684 1208 1212 399 698 404
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 97 97 96 88 98 93 98 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 188 212 449 189 208 651 899 1155
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 32 22 53 20 404 38 698
Volume Left 5 22 0 20 0 38 0
Volume Right 20 0 48 0 9 0 27
cSH 309 189 547 899 1700 1155 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.02 0.24 0.03 0.41
Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 10 82030
Control Delay (s) 18.0 26.6 12.3 9.1 0.0 8.2 0.0
Lane LOS C D B A A
Approach Delay (s) 18.0 16.5 0.4 0.4
Approach LOS C C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
APPENDIX D
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Bkgrd AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1804 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.79 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1466 1583 1129 1863 1583 1003 1863 1583 627 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 53 28 34 15 22 160 62 614 25 95 298 11
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 62 33 40 18 26 188 66 653 27 112 351 13
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 35 0 0 165 008003
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 95 5 18 26 23 66 653 19 112 351 10
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 89.6 84.3 84.3 93.2 86.1 86.1
Effective Green, g (s) 14.6 14.6 14.6 14.6 14.6 91.6 86.3 86.3 95.2 88.1 88.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.76 0.72 0.72 0.79 0.73 0.73
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 178 193 137 227 193 799 1340 1138 565 1368 1162
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 c0.35 c0.01 0.19
v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.15 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.08 0.49 0.02 0.20 0.26 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 46.4 47.0 46.9 47.0 3.5 7.3 4.8 4.1 5.2 4.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0
Delay (s) 52.6 46.5 47.5 47.2 47.2 3.6 8.6 4.8 4.3 5.7 4.3
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.8 47.3 8.0 5.3
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 16.5 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2017) Bkgrd AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 21 69 30 17 73 30
Maximum Split (%) 17.5% 57.5% 25.0% 14.2% 60.8% 25.0%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 19 40 109 19 36 109
End Time (s) 40 109 19 36 109 19
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 103 13 32 103 13
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 92 2 32 92 2
Local Start Time (s) 99 0 69 99 116 69
Local Yield (s) 116 63 93 112 63 93
Local Yield 170(s) 116 52 82 112 52 82
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Bkgrd PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.87 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1583 1377 1863 1583 675 1863 1583 872 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 10 14 23 35 16 155 21 361 11 152 591 60
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 12 16 27 41 19 182 24 415 13 179 695 71
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 25 0 0 165 0030016
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 28 2 41 19 17 24 415 10 179 695 55
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 91.0 87.4 87.4 99.1 91.5 91.5
Effective Green, g (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 93.0 89.4 89.4 101.1 93.5 93.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.84 0.78 0.78
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 148 144 125 169 144 556 1388 1179 792 1452 1233
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 0.22 c0.01 c0.37
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.18 0.03
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.02 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.30 0.01 0.23 0.48 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 50.5 49.7 51.1 50.1 50.1 3.4 5.0 3.9 2.1 4.7 3.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.1
Delay (s) 51.1 49.7 52.7 50.4 50.5 3.4 5.6 3.9 2.2 5.8 3.1
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.4 50.8 5.4 4.9
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 13.1 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2017) Bkgrd PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 23 67 30 16 74 30
Maximum Split (%) 19.2% 55.8% 25.0% 13.3% 61.7% 25.0%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 17 40 107 17 33 107
End Time (s) 40 107 17 33 107 17
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 101 11 29 101 11
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 90 0 29 90 0
Local Start Time (s) 97 0 67 97 113 67
Local Yield (s) 116 61 91 109 61 91
Local Yield 170(s) 116 50 80 109 50 80
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Bkgrd AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 21 10 28 26 11 70 53 610 35 50 292 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 25 12 33 31 13 82 58 663 38 59 344 6
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1331 1280 346 1297 1264 682 349 701
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 464 464 797 797
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 867 816 500 467
vCu, unblocked vol 1331 1280 346 1297 1264 682 349 701
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 80 93 95 82 93 82 95 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 123 179 697 171 193 450 1209 896
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 69 31 95 58 701 59 349
Volume Left 25 31 0 58 0 59 0
Volume Right 33 0 82 0 38 0 6
cSH 221 171 381 1209 1700 896 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.31 0.18 0.25 0.05 0.41 0.07 0.21
Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 16 24 4050
Control Delay (s) 28.6 30.5 17.6 8.1 0.0 9.3 0.0
Lane LOS D D C A A
Approach Delay (s) 28.6 20.7 0.6 1.3
Approach LOS D C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.6% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Bkgrd PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 5 7 18 20 5 43 18 345 8 34 591 24
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 6 8 21 24 6 51 21 406 9 40 695 28
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1291 1247 709 1254 1256 411 724 415
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 789 789 453 453
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 502 458 801 804
vCu, unblocked vol 1291 1247 709 1254 1256 411 724 415
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 97 96 95 87 97 92 98 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 179 204 434 179 200 641 879 1144
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 35 24 56 21 415 40 724
Volume Left 6 24 0 21 0 40 0
Volume Right 21 0 51 0 9 0 28
cSH 289 179 521 879 1700 1144 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.02 0.24 0.03 0.43
Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 11 92030
Control Delay (s) 19.2 28.2 12.7 9.2 0.0 8.3 0.0
Lane LOS C D B A A
Approach Delay (s) 19.2 17.3 0.4 0.4
Approach LOS C C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
APPENDIX E
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1804 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.79 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1468 1583 1144 1863 1583 1018 1863 1583 648 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 51 27 32 15 21 156 60 597 25 93 288 11
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 60 32 38 18 25 184 64 635 27 109 339 13
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 34 0 0 162 007003
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 4 18 25 22 64 635 20 109 339 10
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 90.1 84.8 84.8 93.5 86.5 86.5
Effective Green, g (s) 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 92.1 86.8 86.8 95.5 88.5 88.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.77 0.72 0.72 0.80 0.74 0.74
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 187 135 220 187 815 1348 1145 581 1374 1167
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 c0.34 c0.01 0.18
v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.14 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.02 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.08 0.47 0.02 0.19 0.25 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 49.8 46.8 47.4 47.3 47.3 3.4 7.0 4.7 3.9 5.1 4.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0
Delay (s) 52.6 46.8 47.8 47.5 47.6 3.4 8.1 4.7 4.0 5.5 4.2
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.9 47.6 7.6 5.1
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 16.4 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2015) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 22 67 31 18 71 31
Maximum Split (%) 18.3% 55.8% 25.8% 15.0% 59.2% 25.8%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 18 40 107 18 36 107
End Time (s) 40 107 18 36 107 18
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 101 12 32 101 12
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 90 1 32 90 1
Local Start Time (s) 98 0 67 98 116 67
Local Yield (s) 116 61 92 112 61 92
Local Yield 170(s) 116 50 81 112 50 81
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.87 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 0.48 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1583 1377 1863 1583 693 1863 1583 886 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 10 14 22 34 15 152 21 351 11 148 575 57
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 12 16 26 40 18 179 24 403 13 174 676 67
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 24 0 0 163 0030015
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 28 2 40 18 16 24 403 10 174 676 52
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 91.0 87.4 87.4 99.1 91.5 91.5
Effective Green, g (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 93.0 89.4 89.4 101.1 93.5 93.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.84 0.78 0.78
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 148 144 125 169 144 569 1388 1179 803 1452 1233
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 0.22 c0.01 c0.36
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.17 0.03
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.02 0.32 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.29 0.01 0.22 0.47 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 50.5 49.7 51.1 50.1 50.1 3.3 5.0 3.9 2.0 4.6 3.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.1
Delay (s) 51.1 49.7 52.6 50.4 50.5 3.4 5.5 3.9 2.2 5.7 3.1
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.4 50.8 5.3 4.8
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 13.1 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.1% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2015) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 23 66 31 17 72 31
Maximum Split (%) 19.2% 55.0% 25.8% 14.2% 60.0% 25.8%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 17 40 106 17 34 106
End Time (s) 40 106 17 34 106 17
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 100 11 30 100 11
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 89 0 30 89 0
Local Start Time (s) 97 0 66 97 114 66
Local Yield (s) 116 60 91 110 60 91
Local Yield 170(s) 116 49 80 110 49 80
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 27 10 32 25 11 67 52 588 34 48 281 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 12 38 29 13 79 57 639 37 56 331 7
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1285 1236 334 1258 1221 658 338 676
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 447 447 771 771
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 837 789 487 451
vCu, unblocked vol 1285 1236 334 1258 1221 658 338 676
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 76 94 95 83 94 83 95 94
cM capacity (veh/h) 133 187 708 178 200 464 1222 915
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 81 29 92 57 676 56 338
Volume Left 32 29 0 57 0 56 0
Volume Right 38 0 79 0 37 0 7
cSH 229 178 392 1222 1700 915 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.17 0.23 0.05 0.40 0.06 0.20
Queue Length 95th (ft) 38 14 22 4050
Control Delay (s) 29.1 29.2 17.0 8.1 0.0 9.2 0.0
Lane LOS D D C A A
Approach Delay (s) 29.1 20.0 0.6 1.3
Approach LOS D C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 4.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.0% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 7 6 19 19 4 41 20 335 8 32 570 29
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 7 22 22 5 48 24 394 9 38 671 34
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1255 1214 688 1218 1226 399 705 404
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 763 763 446 446
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 492 451 772 780
vCu, unblocked vol 1255 1214 688 1218 1226 399 705 404
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 96 97 95 88 98 93 97 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 186 210 446 185 205 651 893 1155
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 38 22 53 24 404 38 705
Volume Left 8 22 0 24 0 38 0
Volume Right 22 0 48 0 9 0 34
cSH 294 185 545 893 1700 1155 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.03 0.24 0.03 0.41
Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 10 82030
Control Delay (s) 19.0 27.1 12.3 9.1 0.0 8.2 0.0
Lane LOS C D B A A
Approach Delay (s) 19.0 16.7 0.5 0.4
Approach LOS C C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.5% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
9: County Fair & Site Access HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 59 0 3 66 2 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 69 0 4 78 2 12
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 69 154 69
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 69 154 69
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1531 835 993
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 69 81 14
Volume Left 0 4 2
Volume Right 0 0 12
cSH 1700 1531 963
Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.00 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 8.8
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 8.8
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.9
Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
9: County Fair & Site Access HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2015) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 27 2 9 44 1 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 2 11 52 1 6
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 34 106 33
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 34 106 33
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 99 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1577 886 1041
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1
Volume Total 34 62 7
Volume Left 0 11 1
Volume Right 2 0 6
cSH 1700 1577 1011
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.01 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 1 1
Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 8.6
Lane LOS A A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 8.6
Approach LOS A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.5% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
APPENDIX F
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1804 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.79 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1466 1583 1129 1863 1583 976 1863 1583 615 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 53 28 34 15 22 160 62 625 25 95 317 11
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 62 33 40 18 26 188 66 665 27 112 373 13
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 35 0 0 165 008003
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 95 5 18 26 23 66 665 19 112 373 10
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 89.6 84.3 84.3 93.2 86.1 86.1
Effective Green, g (s) 14.6 14.6 14.6 14.6 14.6 91.6 86.3 86.3 95.2 88.1 88.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.76 0.72 0.72 0.79 0.73 0.73
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 178 193 137 227 193 780 1340 1138 556 1368 1162
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 c0.36 c0.01 0.20
v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.15 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.53 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.08 0.50 0.02 0.20 0.27 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 46.4 47.0 46.9 47.0 3.5 7.4 4.8 4.2 5.3 4.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0
Delay (s) 52.6 46.5 47.5 47.2 47.2 3.6 8.7 4.8 4.4 5.8 4.3
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.8 47.3 8.1 5.4
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 16.4 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2017) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 21 69 30 17 73 30
Maximum Split (%) 17.5% 57.5% 25.0% 14.2% 60.8% 25.0%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 19 40 109 19 36 109
End Time (s) 40 109 19 36 109 19
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 103 13 32 103 13
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 92 2 32 92 2
Local Start Time (s) 99 0 69 99 116 69
Local Yield (s) 116 63 93 112 63 93
Local Yield 170(s) 116 52 82 112 52 82
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.87 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1583 1377 1863 1583 658 1863 1583 840 1863 1583
Volume (vph) 10 14 23 35 16 155 21 387 11 152 606 60
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85
Adj. Flow (vph) 12 16 27 41 19 182 24 445 13 179 713 71
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 25 0 0 165 0030016
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 28 2 41 19 17 24 445 10 179 713 55
Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 91.0 87.4 87.4 99.1 91.5 91.5
Effective Green, g (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 93.0 89.4 89.4 101.1 93.5 93.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.84 0.78 0.78
Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 148 144 125 169 144 543 1388 1179 767 1452 1233
v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.00 0.24 c0.01 c0.38
v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.18 0.03
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.02 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.32 0.01 0.23 0.49 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 50.5 49.7 51.1 50.1 50.1 3.5 5.1 3.9 2.2 4.7 3.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 1.2 0.1
Delay (s) 51.1 49.7 52.7 50.4 50.5 3.5 5.7 3.9 2.3 5.9 3.1
Level of Service DDDDDAAAAAA
Approach Delay (s) 50.4 50.8 5.6 5.1
Approach LOS D D A A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay 13.0 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
3: Rock Creek & Ziegler Timing Report, Sorted By Phase
Short Range (2017) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Phase Number 124568
Movement SBL NBTL EBTL NBL SBTL WBTL
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None C-Min None None C-Min None
Maximum Split (s) 23 67 30 16 74 30
Maximum Split (%) 19.2% 55.8% 25.0% 13.3% 61.7% 25.0%
Minimum Split (s) 8 22 22 8 22 22
Yellow Time (s) 344344
All-Red Time (s) 122122
Minimum Initial (s) 444444
Vehicle Extension (s) 333333
Minimum Gap (s) 333333
Time Before Reduce (s) 000000
Time To Reduce (s) 000000
Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11
Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Start Time (s) 17 40 107 17 33 107
End Time (s) 40 107 17 33 107 17
Yield/Force Off (s) 36 101 11 29 101 11
Yield/Force Off 170(s) 36 90 0 29 90 0
Local Start Time (s) 97 0 67 97 113 67
Local Yield (s) 116 61 91 109 61 91
Local Yield 170(s) 116 50 80 109 50 80
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length 120
Control Type Actuated-Coordinated
Natural Cycle 60
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Splits and Phases: 3: Rock Creek & Ziegler
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 32 10 34 26 11 70 61 610 35 50 292 24
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 38 12 40 31 13 82 66 663 38 59 344 28
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1360 1309 358 1322 1304 682 372 701
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 475 475 815 815
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 884 834 507 489
vCu, unblocked vol 1360 1309 358 1322 1304 682 372 701
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 68 93 94 81 93 82 94 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 118 173 687 164 185 450 1187 896
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 89 31 95 66 701 59 372
Volume Left 38 31 0 66 0 59 0
Volume Right 40 0 82 0 38 0 28
cSH 201 164 377 1187 1700 896 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.44 0.19 0.25 0.06 0.41 0.07 0.22
Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 16 25 4050
Control Delay (s) 36.5 31.8 17.8 8.2 0.0 9.3 0.0
Lane LOS E D C A A
Approach Delay (s) 36.5 21.2 0.7 1.3
Approach LOS E C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 5.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.6% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
6: County Fair & Ziegler HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 31 7 29 20 5 43 25 345 8 34 591 39
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 36 8 34 24 6 51 29 406 9 40 695 46
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised Raised
Median storage veh) 0 0
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1316 1272 718 1283 1291 411 741 415
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 798 798 469 469
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 518 474 814 821
vCu, unblocked vol 1316 1272 718 1283 1291 411 741 415
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0 queue free % 79 96 92 86 97 92 97 97
cM capacity (veh/h) 174 199 429 166 191 641 866 1144
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 79 24 56 29 415 40 741
Volume Left 36 24 0 29 0 40 0
Volume Right 34 0 51 0 9 0 46
cSH 238 166 515 866 1700 1144 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.14 0.11 0.03 0.24 0.03 0.44
Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 12 93030
Control Delay (s) 27.4 30.2 12.8 9.3 0.0 8.3 0.0
Lane LOS D D B A A
Approach Delay (s) 27.4 18.0 0.6 0.4
Approach LOS D C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
9: County Fair & HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Total AM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 4 59 0 3 69 24 2 0 10 7 0 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 69 0 4 81 28 2 0 12 8 0 1
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 109 69 182 195 69 193 181 95
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 109 69 182 195 69 193 181 95
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1481 1531 775 696 993 754 709 961
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 74 113 14 9
Volume Left 5428
Volume Right 0 28 12 1
cSH 1481 1531 949 775
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0011
Control Delay (s) 0.5 0.2 8.9 9.7
Lane LOS AAAA
Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.2 8.9 9.7
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.3
Intersection Capacity Utilization 16.0% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
9: County Fair & HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Short Range (2017) Total PM 11/27/2012
Michael Delich Synchro 6
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. 11/27/2012
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 2 30 2 9 47 13 1 0 5 32 0 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 35 2 11 55 15 1 0 6 38 0 7
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 71 38 132 133 36 131 126 63
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 71 38 132 133 36 131 126 63
tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3
p0 queue free % 100 99 100 100 99 95 100 99
cM capacity (veh/h) 1530 1573 828 752 1036 831 758 1002
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total 40 81 7 45
Volume Left 2 11 1 38
Volume Right 2 15 6 7
cSH 1530 1573 994 854
Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0114
Control Delay (s) 0.4 1.0 8.6 9.4
Lane LOS AAAA
Approach Delay (s) 0.4 1.0 8.6 9.4
Approach LOS A A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 3.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
APPENDIX G
Harmony
Rock Creek
Ziegler
Lady Moon
Kechter
Timberline
2
3
1
4
Fossil
Creek
HS
Bacon
ES
Saber
Cat
Preston
MS
5
Traut
Core
5
SCALE: 1"=2000'
PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
Project Location Classification: Other
Level of Service (minimum based on project location classification)
Description of
Applicable Destination
Area Within 1320’
Destination
Area
Classification
Directness Continuity Street
Crossings
Visual
Interest &
Amenities
Security
Minimum B B B C B
1 Actual A D B B A
Fossil Creek High
School School
Proposed A B B B A
Minimum C C C C C
2 Actual A D B B A
Residential
neighborhood to the
north and northwest
Residential
Proposed A B B B A
Minimum C C C C C
3 Actual A D B B A
Residential
neighborhood to the
south and southwest
Residential
Proposed A B B B A
Minimum C C C C C
4 Actual A D B B A
Residential
neighborhood to the
south
Residential
Proposed A B B B A
Minimum B B B C B
5 Actual A D B B A
Preston Middle
School/Traut Core
School
School
Proposed A B B B A
Minimum
6 Actual
Proposed
Minimum
7 Actual
Proposed
Minimum
8 Actual
Proposed
Minimum
9 Actual
Proposed
Harmony
Rock Creek
Lady Moon
Kechter
Fossil
Creek
HS
Saber Cat
SCALE: 1"=1000'
BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA
DELICH
ASSOCIATES
Harvest Park/Ziegler Mixed-Use TIS, November 2012
Bicycle LOS Worksheet
Level of Service – Connectivity
Minimum Actual Proposed
Base Connectivity: C B B
Specific connections to priority sites:
Description of
Applicable Destination
Area Within 1320’
Destination
Area
Classification
1
Fossil Creek High
School School A A A
2
3
4
Minimum
10 Actual
Proposed
9 SPACES
SEWER
WATER / FIRE
STONE SITTING WALL
TRELLIS
STONE SITTING WALL
TRELLIS
6005 S.F.
FF = 12.18
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
GARAGE
TURF
STORM WATER STORM WATER
STORM WATER STORM WATER
WATER / FIRE
WATER / FIRE
WATER / FIRE
SEWER
SEWER
GARAGE
GARAGE
30' SETBACK
15'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
WALK
WALK
SANITARY SANITARY
CONC. PVMT.
9' UTILITY EASEMENT
9'
STOR
MWATER
STORM WATER
STORMWATER
WALK
WALK TURF
TURF
TURF
WALK
CONC. PVMT.
STORM WATER
STORM WATER
TURF
FUTURE STORM WATER
FUTURE STORM WATER
SEWER
SEWER
WATER LINE
PROPERTY LINE
WATER LIN
E
HCP
SEWER
WALK
WALK
5 PLEX RESIDENCE
21
2 STORY
BUILDING C
6 PLEX RESIDENCE
21
2 STORY
BUILDING B
5000 S,F,
FF = 10.60
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
100' BUFFER FROM
WETLANDS
100' BUFFER FROM WETLANDS
100 YEAR
FLOODPLAIN
EASEMENT
EASEMENT EASEMENT
EASEMENT
HIGH WATER MARK
5' UTILITY EASEMENT
TURF
17'
TYP.
20' ESMT.
BR
ALLEY
5
8 SPACES
GARAGE
5 PLEX RESIDENCE
21
2 STORY
BUILDING C
5000 S,F,
FF = 10.60
County Fair Lane
Saber Cat Drive