Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIDGEWOOD HILLS RESIDENCES, 4TH FILING - FDP - FDP130052 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSAugust 7, 2014 Project File # 12-390 City of Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 N. College Ave Fort Collins, CO 80522 Attention: Mr. Ted Shepard Senior Planner RE: Ridgewood Hills Residences 4th Filing, FDP130052 Dear Mr. Shepard, Please accept this letter and the accompanying documents in response to review comments received from the City of Fort Collins and referral agencies regarding our first submittal of Final Compliance drawings for the proposed development of the referenced property. In this letter, we have replicated the comments received from the City and have inserted written responses (shown in blue italics) following each of the respective comments. We trust that you will find the following responses, and the corresponding revisions to the project documents, acceptable. If you have further questions or comments regarding this submittal, please contact me immediately. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please verify with the Postal Service that delivery will be provided to each individual building. If such delivery is not allowed, then provide for a mail delivery system at the clubhouse. Discussions were held with the USPS and it was determined that delivery to each individual building would not be provided. Therefore, mail kiosks have been added to the Site Plan at two convenient locations within the site; one in Tract A and another in Tract B. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please re-position the three pole-mounted parking lot light fixtures at the south end of the Tract A so the orientation is more northerly and thus less impactful on the residential area to the south. Then provide House-Side Shields to minimize glare. The pole-mounted light fixtures have been repositioned to reduce the potential for undesirable light impact to adjacent properties. An updated photometric plan is included with this resubmittal. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: For the 16-unit building in the southeast corner of Tract A, there is a cluster of four light fixtures in close proximity. This appears to be redundant. The concern is excessive illumination and the impact on the adjoining residential area. Please consider consolidating this wall-mounted lighting so it is more efficient. After consulting with the electrical engineer, the architect and the Owner, it was decided the lights will need to remain for security and safety concerns. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: For the walkway connection in Tract Z, there is a note indicating both concrete and crusher fines. Please clarify. The note has been revised to indicate that the connecting walkway is to be constructed of concrete. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/17/2014 01/17/2014: Will the buildings be cooled by use of outdoor condensing units? If so, please add a General Note that ground-mounted outdoor condensing units will be screened by landscaping to the maximum extent feasible. The dwelling units will be cooled through the use of outdoor condensing units. A note has been added to the Site Plan and Landscape Plan stating that the condensing units are to be screened, and suitable plantings have been shown on the Landscape Plan. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/17/2014 01/17/2014: Please add notation that the crosswalk in front of the clubhouse consists of pavement striping. We need to make sure that this striping is installed. A note and label is provided. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/17/2014 01/17/2014: Please double check the Legend for both the Site and Landscape Plans. Be sure that the Legends include all the details as shown on Site Details sheet 4 of 8. For example, I'm not seeing where the pet station and seat walls will be installed. Also, be sure to add one trash container for each pet station. (As a suggestion, perhaps the art students at the Coyote Ridge Elementary School can paint the trash containers as has been done in various public parks throughout the City. This will help the project integrate into the neighborhood.) The labels and/or the legend is updated. Each pet station will have a trash container and a detail is provided. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/17/2014 01/17/2014: On plans sheets, please do not use ghosted text as it does not reproduce with clarity. Ghosted text is removed. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/17/2014 01/17/2014: Please add a detail that describes the retaining walls. These walls should be as naturalistic as possible. Please avoid pink rock. A detail is added that shows the detail of the proposed wall south of Avondale Road on the west side. The modular wall will NOT be pink in color and natural boulders will ‘break-up’ the length of the wall and ‘deconstruct’ the wall at each end when tying back into grades not requiring a wall to retain. Other walls typically associated with grassy swales and bio-swales are larger boulders used to retain shorter heights and to provide a more natural look. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: General note #48 indicated that a variance was allowed for 3 foot of cover over storm utilities. Was this pertaining to cover along a public street? Would like to verify what this pertains to. Reference to a variance for sub-standard cover over storm mains has been removed. All storm piping within public rights-of-way has the required 3’ minimum cover. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The no parking signs shown on the signing and striping plan sheet needs to be shown along Avondale east of the eastern driveway in addition to along the cul-de-sac bulb. The Signage & Striping Plan has been revised to show “No Parking” signs along the street, east of the eastern driveway, as well as along the perimeter of the temporary cul-de-sac bulb. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please ensure that FCLWD/SFCSD signature blocks are added on the sheets deemed necessary by FCLWD/SFCSD. The water and sewer details on the sheet are all City and I believe would need to be changed. FCLWD / SFCSD signature blocks have been added to the cover sheet, per instructions from Terry Farrill. All details pertaining to water and / or sewer have been revised to present the FCLWD / SFCSD standards. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: On sheet 32 please revised the use of an inlet detail from Denver to the appropriate City of Fort Collins detail(s). The inlet detail has been revised, as requested. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The cover sheet indicates the creation of LID sheets under separate cover. I would prefer that if these sheets need to be approved and filed with the City that they are included as part of this set. (Or alternatively, if okay with Stormwater, these sheets can be indicated as part the planning set.) The sheets showing designs for the L.I.D. components have been included with the other utility plan drawings in the project drawing sets. Due to the nature of the L.I.D. design, some of the drawings are included in both the Site Plan drawing set as well as in the Utility Plans drawing set. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: On the utility profile sheets there are instances where the curb and gutter is not depicted on the streets in which the utility lines cross. Alignment D and E on Sheet 15 (and 17) has this issue. The curb & gutter is shown in the profile where there is a barrier curb. Where the utility line alignment leaves the public street beneath a driveway entrance, the profile of the driveway surface is shown in the profile. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: On Sheet 18 the crossing of Alignment L into Avondale seems to depict Avondale's finished grade as having a slope not directed to the curb and gutter, is this intended? This profile has been modified substantially, primarily to reflect revisions to the design of the storm drain to avoid crossing conflicts, but also to improve the depiction of the street cross-section and the location of the pipe relative to the surface grade. The revised profile now more accurately represents the proposed conditions. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: On the plan and profile sheet for Avondale please indicate an existing grade along flowline and centerline that the proposed grades would tie into with the extension. Flow line profiles of the existing sections of curb & gutter, as well as the centerline of the existing pavement, have been shown on the drawings, along with the eastward extensions of those profiles. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please provide cross-sections for the to be constructed Avondale Road along the property at 50 foot intervals. Of particular interest is the cross slope at the eastern end of the property as the crown of the roadway appears to transition out and would need to be looked at closer with review of the cross sections. If ultimately agreed to, mill limits would need to be indicated on the plans showing how much asphalt would need to be removed by future development with the extension of the roadway to the east (and the corresponding escrow that would be needed). Street cross sections have been added to the drawing set. I believe that the road cross-section presented in some of the previously submitted utility profiles was misleading. A typical crowned section is intended and that is what is represented in the cross sections included with this resubmittal. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please show proposed street patching on the utility plan sheet. There is a depiction that implies street patching on Triangle at Woodrow Drive and further north, but the water and sewer tie-ins appear to be between these two depictions. The area of Triangle Drive where pavement removal and replacement is to be done, in the vicinity of the sewer and water tie-ins, has been shown on the drawings. There is no intent to remove or replace pavement in other areas along Triangle Drive, unless minor pavement removal and patching is necessary in connection with the making of improvements to the curb lowering at the existing pedestrian ramp opposite Woodrow Dr. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The response letter indicates that a note was added to the drawings to indicate the rebuilding of the existing access ramp at the north end of the site along Triangle Drive for ADA and current City code compliance. I'm not finding this on the drawings, can it be pointed out? It should be pointed out on the horizontal control plan on Sheet 12. The requirement to construct a handicapped access ramp along the east side of Triangle Drive will be at a point opposite the southwest corner of the intersection with Woodrow Dr., rather than at the north extremity of the site. This proposed ramp has been added to the Horizontal Control Plan. There is another existing handicapped access ramp on the east side of Triangle Drive at the extreme north limit of the property, but it is not proposed to be removed or reconstructed. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please add the City's driveover curb detail to the details sheet. This detail has been added, as requested. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The sidewalk chase detail included in the plan set specifies the widening of the sidewalk on both sides of the chase. This widening should be depicted on the plans to ensure it's not initially missed with the construction of sidewalk. Widening of the sidewalk at chase locations has been shown on the Horizontal Control Plan. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The plans should indicate the use of driveover curb for the emergency access off of Triangle Drive. The requirement for the installation of roll-over curb at the temporary turn-around has been shown on the Horizontal Control Plan. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please relocate the tree on the north side of Avondale Road that is at the eastern boundary of the site just east of the temporary turnaround. It should not be in the path of the future extension of the sidewalk. In general I'm trying to recall again why the sidewalk on the north side of Avondale cannot be extended to eastern boundary of the property as was done on the south side? The extension of the sidewalk by future development would be disruptive to the property and irrigation would need to be retrofitted to provide irrigation that does not irrigate on the sidewalk. The drawings have been revised to show the tree in question relocated so that it does not conflict with the extension of the sidewalk along the north side of Avondale St. The drawings show the street pavement and permanent sidewalks being constructed throughout the full length of Avondale St., with the exception of the final approximately 10 feet, in which the final grade will be temporarily tapered down to meet the existing grade. Funds will be escrowed with the City to cover the costs of completing that most easterly portion of the street improvements at a later date. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: If there are any existing trees on site contact the City Forester for an on-site inspection to determine species, size, condition and mitigation. Existing significant trees need to be retained to the extent reasonably feasible. There are no existing trees on the site. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Species Changes: Marshall Ash and Patmore Ash are used on the project. With the detection of Emerald Ash Borer in Colorado designers are not including ash in designs. Selecting a non-ash species as substitution will greatly increase the future sustainability of the landscape. Please provide an alternate species for the ash for improved landscape sustainability. (13) thirteen Marshall Ash have been replaced with seedless Kentucky coffee trees. Patmore ash has been replaced with Chinkapin Oak. Princess Kay Plum is used on the project. The City Forestry Division has found it does not survive long term in the Fort Collins area. Please use a substation ornamental tree. Eight Princess Kay Plum species have been replaced with Tatarian Maple. Please Change the English Oak used as a street Tree to Greenspire Linden Proposed English Oak street trees have been replaced with Greenspire Linden. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Provide a landscape note that includes all the tree utility separation standards in LUC 3.2.1 K. The note should say in effect….. The following tree separation distances shall be provided between utilities, signs and driveways. Forty feet between shade trees and streetlights. Fifteen feet between ornamental trees and streetlights. Twenty feet between shade and/or ornamental trees and traffic control signs and devices. Ten feet between trees and water or sewer mains. Six feet between trees and water or sewer service lines. Four feet between trees and gas lines. Eight feet between trees and driveways. These notes have been added to the sheet set. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Provide locations of streetlights, stop signs and utilities and provide the separation distances between trees in LUC 3.2.1 K. There are currently trees shown within 8 feet of driveways that need to be adjusted. Provide at least 20 feet separtion between trees and stop signs. Trees within 8 feet of driveways and 20 feet of stop signs (yield sign in the case of the round-about) have been removed. Specifically, (3) Western Hackberrys were removed at the round-about to provide the minimum clearances. Required street trees along Triangle Drive have been adjusted to maximize the distance to the existing water line in the street as they relate to their distance from the proposed edge of sidewalk. The closest a street tree is located to the existing waterline is 8.75’. Avondale street trees were adjusted to accommodate two newly proposed street lights based on the preliminary layout redline plan provided to us from Robert Irish. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Evaluate the two street trees planted at the corner of Triangle and Avondale with traffic operations staff for sight distance impact. These trees have been removed. See response to comment #4 above. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please add these standard landscape notes. Include the following. Contact the City Planner for any others that should be placed on the plan. • The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. • A permit must be obtained from the City forester before any trees or shrubs as noted on this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve the location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy. • Contact the City Forester to inspect all street tree plantings at the completion of each phase of the development. All trees need to have been installed as shown on the landscape plan. Approval of street tree planting is required before final approval of each phase. • Street Trees shall be supplied and planted by the developer using a qualified landscape contractor. • The Developer shall replace dead or dying street trees after planting until final maintenance inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins Forestry Division. All street trees in the project must be established, of an approved species and of acceptable condition prior to acceptance. • All landscape plants including turf will be irrigated with a permanent automatic irrigation system. These notes have been added to the sheet set (sheet 8 of 8). Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Review the minimum species diversity standard LUC 3.2.1 D 3. List the percentage of each species in the plant list by adding a column to the list. Check to be sure numbers used meet the standard. Species diversity percentages have been added to the plant list and are shown to meet the standard. Department: Light And Power Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/14/2014 01/14/2014: I did not see layouts for dry utilities, including electric, gas, telephone and cable television shown on the drawings. Please show preferred electric and gas meter locations on the drawings so these can be coordinated with Light & Power Engineering. A dry utilities layout has been added to the Utilities Plans, per discussions with City staff. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/14/2014 01/14/2014: Transformer locations need to be coordinated within 10' of a paved surface with 8' of clearance in the front and 3' on the sides and rear of transformer. Meter locations need to be determined before transformer locations can be coordinated. Transformer locations have been shown on the Utilities Plans, per discussions with City staff. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/14/2014 01/14/2014: Will 3-phase power be needed to the club house or any other buildings on the site? A C-1 form and One-line diagram will need to be submitted to Light & Power for the club house. If any of the residential buildings will be 3-phase, a C-1 form and One-line diagram will need to be submitted for them as well. Three-phase power is not expected to be required for the clubhouse. A C-1 form and one-line diagram for the clubhouse will be submitted to the City under separate cover. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/14/2014 01/14/2014: Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges and system modification charges where applicable will apply. Comment noted. Applicable fees will be paid when due. Contact Light & Power Engineering @ 970-221-6700. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: FIRE LANE Please provide further details for the "Emergency Access Only with Gate" portion of the EAE on the north end of the property. Prior discussions covered roll over curbs, gate design, and surfacing materials however I'm not finding this information provided on the current set of plans. I will need this information (including gate design) added to the plans. Details have been added to the drawings showing the roll-over curb and gate design, and specifying the required surfacing of the emergency access drive. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/09/2014 01/09/2014: Minor Redlines on Erosion Control Plans. Erosion control Report and Escrow are required. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Revisions have been made to the Erosion Control Plan, as requested, and an Erosion Control Report and Escrow / Security Calculation have been prepared and are included with this resubmittal. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The porous pavement sections require an under-drain with an outfall. Please show on the plans and in the details. Based on discussions with City staff, the porous pavement areas have been eliminated in favor of expanded bio-swales and sub-surface filtration / pretreatment cells in parking area landscaped islands. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Retaining walls higher than 4 feet from bottom of footing to top of wall require a building permit and a structural design. The east wall looks to be taller than 4 feet and possibly the south walls as well. Building permits will be obtained, where necessary, prior to constructing any walls greater than 4’ in height. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please label TOW and BOW for the retaining walls along the south property line. Elevations designating TOW and BOW have been added to the drawings at appropriate locations. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please provide all details needed for the porous pavement sections. Please see the response to Comment #2 above. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Some of the slopes are steeper than 4 to 1. These need to be landscaped so erosion and maintenance is not a concern. All slopes will be landscaped to minimize erosion and maintenance concerns. Steeper slopes will be landscaped such that routine mowing is not necessary. Ground cover plantings, shrubs or native grasses will utilized, as shown on the Landscape Plans. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The porous pavement sections can not have more than twice the area of the porous pavers draining onto it. Please verify this is being met. Please see the response to Comment #2 above. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please include the bio-swale soil specification on the utility plans. A reference to a City of Fort Collins bio-swale soil specification has been added to the drawings. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please include the LID plans within the utility plan set. The L.I.D. plans have been incorporated into the Utility Plan set. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Drainage easements are required for the limits of the porous pavement areas and the bio-swales in addition to all other drainage infrastructure. The scope of the drainage easements has been increased to also include the bio-swale areas. Permeable pavers have been eliminated, as noted in the responses above. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please provide details for the existing pond outlet modifications that are proposed. Details of the proposed modifications to the existing outlet control structures have been added to the drawings. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Reminder that the HOA agreement is required before signing of mylars. Comment noted. A copy of the signed agreement with the HOA will be provided, as soon as it is available. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: No plans were provided for review. Topic: Construction Drawings All comments received from Technical Services via the redlined drawings, and as noted in the comments below, have been addressed in the revised drawings. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please correct the L.I.D. section of the index on sheet 1. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please mask all symbols & elevations on sheet 4, so that they can be clearly read. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please mask all drainage symbols & data on sheets 5 & 6, so that they can be clearly read over all other information. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: There are line over text issues on the grading plans. All elevations must be clearly read. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please make sure all street names are shown completely on each sheet. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please mask all text within the profiles. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please make sure that all text reads from the bottom and/or right sides of the sheet. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: There are text over text issues on several sheets. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: LID SHEETS: Please correct the matchline sheet numbers on sheets LID.1 & LID.2. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The title of sheet 8 does not match the index on sheet 1 of the site plans. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Please add a note to sheet 1 stating that Tract N, Ridgewood Hills Third Filing incorrectly has it's area listed as 227,694 square feet. The requested note has been added. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: There are line over text issues on sheet 2. Please mask all text within hatching. See redlines. The line-over-text conflicts have been corrected, and text within hatching has been masked, as requested. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Is the July 30, 2013 title commitment the most recent? The title commitment is the most recent. If an updated one is needed, it will be provided prior to recordation. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: The title of sheet 8 in the index does not match the title on landscape plan sheet 8. The titles match. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Sheet 27/36: Revise the bike lane striping to be 6" solid white lines instead of 4". The Signage & Striping Plan has been revised as requested. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Sheet 27/36: Please add an R7-1 sign (No Parking Anytime w/ arrow) on the east (north) side of the new extension of Avondale and left of the southern-most site driveway with the arrow pointing south. The sign is to prohibit parking in front of the turn-around area at the south end of Avondale. The additional sign has been added to the Signage & Striping Plan, as requested. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Sheet 27/36: Please add signage at the Roundabout (Rbt) for the new extension of Avondale. Signage for the new approach should match existing signage for the other approaches. Signs are currently existing for each of the four directions approaching the roundabout. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/15/2014 01/15/2014: Sht 27/36: Please add some dimensions to the painted splitter island to guide the placement of the yellow side lines (labeled as A) in the roadway. Dimension the distance between the ends of the splitter island at the Rbt and at the X-walk. Dimension one side of those yellow side stripe ends from a base point such as the curb face, flowline, street centerline, etc.. All of this is due to the City isn't installing much development striping anymore therefore we've found we need to provide some minimal design info for outside contractors on these mini-Rbt characteristics. Dimensioning for the Rbt striping has been added to the Signage & Striping Plan. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/16/2014 01/15/2014: Sht 27/36: Please add a note to state not to include the white dashed line on the new approach to the Rbt that delineates the outer edge of the Rbt circulating lane (exists on other 3 legs). In locations that have that striping existing we are letting it wear away and not refreshing it. Note added, as requested. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/16/2014 01/15/2014: Sht 27/36: Please remove the solid white stripes (labeled as C) on both sides of the enhanced crosswalk. We no longer add that striping to enhanced crosswalks. Lines deleted, as requested. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/16/2014 01/15/2014: Please add the City's Enhanced Crosswalk Detail, Drawing 1610, from LCUASS Appendix A to the plans. Just for reference the Enhanced Crosswalks are now colored/stamped Concrete and not asphalt, per LCUASS section 16.6.1. The enhanced crosswalk detail has been added to the drawing set. Topic: General Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/16/2014 01/15/2014: Feel free to submit revised S&S plans by emailed PDF for pre-review prior to the next resubmittal. Comment noted. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/16/2014 01/16/2014: No additional parking restrictions will be added, nor will the splitter islands (new or existing) become raised splitter islands (Admin Hearing conditions). Comment noted.